BMC Rheumatology最新文献

Background: Healthy lifestyle habits (regular physical activity, a healthy diet, no smoking and non-hazardous alcohol consumption) alongside pharmacological treatment can lower the risk of cardiovascular diseases and improve symptoms and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, healthcare professionals in rheumatology care are urged to discuss lifestyle habits with all patients. The aim of this study was to explore patients' perceptions of lifestyle discussions in early rheumatology care.

Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 20 patients with RA, 14 women and six men, aged 23 to 77 years, and with a mean disease duration of 2.4 years. All lifestyle discussions were performed during the first year with RA. A qualitative content analysis was performed.

Results: An overarching theme emerged, exploring how patients with RA perceived lifestyle discussions as facilitating self-management. Three categories illustrated this: (1) the usefulness of lifestyle discussions depended on the individual patient's preferences and prioritization for lifestyle support; (2) the design of lifestyle discussions should be based on a person-centred approach, incorporating personalized lifestyle information and providing structured and recurrent support; (3) the outcomes of lifestyle discussions should contribute to enhanced knowledge and motivation for making healthy lifestyle changes.

Conclusion: Lifestyle discussions in early rheumatology care should, according to patients with RA, be based on a person-centred approach, be tailored to each patient's preferences and needs, and have outcomes focusing on patient support for healthy lifestyle changes, all essential elements to facilitate self-management. The present findings can be used to guide the development and implementation of more person-centred lifestyle approaches targeted to facilitate lifestyle changes and benefit cardiovascular disease risk management in early rheumatology care.

Background: Intermittent fasting (IF) has shown benefits in various pathological conditions. Although its anti-inflammatory potential has been recognized, its effects on the mechanism underlying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to investigate the effects of IF in a murine model of RA.

Methods: Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) was developed in sixteen male DBA/1 mice, randomly assigned to two groups, with one undergoing IF every other day for four weeks. The effects of IF on joint inflammation and remodeling were evaluated clinically, histologically, and through tomography. Transcriptomic changes were characterized using expression microarrays, validated by RT-qPCR, and confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Additionally, modifications in gut microbiota were assessed through 16 S sequencing.

Results: Mice subjected to IF significantly reduced the incidence and severity of clinical arthritis. Histological and radiographic assessments confirmed a decrease in inflammation and joint damage. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that IF led to the upregulation of 364 genes and the downregulation of 543 genes, with notable reductions in inflammatory signaling pathways associated with RA-related genes, including Cd72, Cd79a, Ifna, Il33, and Bglap 2. Notably, IL33 emerged as a pivotal mediator in the inflammatory processes mitigated by fasting. Key regulators associated with IF effects, such as CEBPA, FOXO1, HIF1A, PPARG, and PPARA, were identified, indicating a complex interplay between metabolic and inflammatory pathways. Furthermore, differential expression of microRNAs and lncRNAs, including miR-15b, miR-103-2, miR-302a, miR-6985, and miR- 5624, was observed. Metagenomic analysis indicated that IF enhanced the abundance and diversity of the gut microbiome, explicitly promoting anti-inflammatory bacterial populations, notably within the genus Ruminococcaceae.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that IF exerts significant anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects in the context of CIA. Given its non-risky nature, further investigation into the potential benefits of IF in patients with RA is warranted.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Background: Chronic invasive rhinosinusitis with facial bone damage is a common cause of functional and social impairment in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients. To the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical or laboratory biomarker to predict bone damage.

Methods: This case-control study included 90 patients with GPA and 270 health controls (HCs). Patients were categorized according to the presence of tomographic facial bone erosions. Frequency of RANKL and osteoprotegerin single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, were compared between patients and HCs, and between patients with and without bone damage. Clinical, therapeutic, and laboratory data were analyzed.

Results: Facial bone erosion was observed in 55.5% of patients. No difference was found in the frequency of SNPs between patients with GPA and HCs. GPA patients were compared according to the presence or absence of bone damage, and a difference was found in the frequencies of osteoprotegerin G1181C (rs2073618) and RANKL A290G (rs2277438). A multivariate analysis showed that the CC genotype of osteoprotegerin 1181 was independently associated with bone erosion (OR = 3.95, CI95%=1.20-13.00, P = 0.02), as were the presence of the G allele in RANKL A290G (OR = 6.13, CI95%=1.95-19.26, P = 0.002) and higher disease duration (OR = 1.08, CI95%=1,01-1.15, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: SNPs in osteoprotegerin G1181C and RANKL A290G may play a role in the development of destructive rhinosinusitis in patients with GPA. Genetic assessment may be useful for identifying high-risk individuals. This observational study might work as a basis for further research to better understand this association and clinical trials using RANKL/osteoprotegerin as therapeutic targets.

Background: Thermography is an emerging imaging modality which allows for a quick and objective measure of joint surface temperature in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, there are no published studies comparing thermography with ultrasonography in the subclinical assessment of joint inflammation at the wrist of patients with RA, and no published data on inter-rater reliability for multiple raters for thermographic assessment at the RA wrist. In our study comparing thermography and ultrasonography at the RA wrist, we aim to determine if thermography can detect subclinical synovitis. Additionally, we performed inter-reliability testing (multiple raters) for both thermography and ultrasonography.

Methods: Thermographic (average (Tavg), maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures) and ultrasound (total grey-scale (TGS) score and total power Doppler (TPD) scores) parameters were compared between two patient groups: Asymptomatic Group (with non-swollen and non-tender wrists) and Symptomatic Group (with swollen and/or tender wrists). Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic parameters were compared between those with and without wrist joint recess(es) having ultrasound synovitis (PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2); Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression were used to study the relationship between thermographic and ultrasound parameters. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for inter-rater reliability calculation.

Results: Eighty-seven RA patients' right wrists were imaged in this cross-sectional study. Thermographic temperatures, TPD and TGS scores were all significantly (p < 0.05) greater among Symptomatic Group versus Asymptomatic Group patients. Among Asymptomatic Group patients, thermographic temperatures were all significantly higher (P < 0.01) in wrists having joint recess(es) with ultrasound PD ≥ 1 or GS ≥ 2, while all thermographic parameters correlated significantly with TPD (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.43 to 0.48, p < 0.001) and TGS (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.33 to 0.37, p < 0.01). The ICC values based on a subset of images obtained for inter-reliability testing were high for thermography (0.994 to 0.998) and ultrasonography (0.933 to 0.952).

Conclusions: Swollen and/or tender RA wrists displayed greater thermographic and ultrasound-detected joint inflammation. At clinically quiescent (non-swollen; non-tender) wrists, thermographic temperatures significantly correlated with ultrasound-detected joint inflammation.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Objectives: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the risk and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa quality assessment scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 14 software.

Results: A total of 62 studies were included in the analysis. First, the meta-analysis revealed the following prevalence rates among rheumatoid arthritis patients: COVID-19, 11%; severe COVID-19, 18%; COVID-19-related hospitalization, 29%; admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19, 10%; and death from COVID-19, 8%. Second, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection (OR 1.045(0.969-1.122), p = 0.006), COVID-19-related hospitalization (OR 1.319(1.055-1.584), p = 0.006), admission to the ICU due to COVID-19 (OR 1.498(1.145-1.850), p = 0.002), and death from COVID-19 (OR 1.377(1.168-1.587), p = 0.001). Third, no statistically significant association was found between rheumatoid arthritis and severe COVID-19 (OR 1.354(1.002-1.706), p = 0.135).

Conclusions: Rheumatoid arthritis patients have a significantly greater risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death than individuals without rheumatoid arthritis. However, rheumatoid arthritis did not show a significant association with the risk of severe COVID-19. These findings underscore the need for tailored management strategies and vigilant monitoring of COVID-19 outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Systematic review registration: The study has been registered on PROSPERO [ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ], and the registration number is CRD42024528119.

Background: The histopathological analysis of minor salivary gland biopsies, particularly through the quantification of the Focus Score (FS), is pivotal in the diagnostic workflow for Sjögren's Syndrome (SS). AI-based image recognition using deep learning models has demonstrated potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in preclinical research.

Objectives: The primary aim of this investigation was to utilize an auto-machine learning (autoML) platform for the automated segmentation and quantification of FS on histopathological slides, aiming to augment diagnostic precision and speed in SS.

Methods: A cohort comprising 86 patients with sicca syndrome (37 diagnosed with SS based on the 2016 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria and 49 non-SS) was selected for an in-depth histological examination. A repository of 172 slides (two per patient) was assembled, encompassing 74 slides meeting the classificatory thresholds for SS (FS ≥ 1, indicative of lymphocytic infiltration) and 98 slides showcasing normal salivary gland histology. The autoML platform utilized (Giotto, L2F, Lausanne Switzerland) employed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture (ResNet-152) for the training and validation phases, using a dataset of 172 slides.

Results: The developed model exhibited a reliability score of 0.88, proficiently distinguishing SS cases, with a sensitivity of 89.47% (95% CI: 66.86% to 98.70%) and a specificity of 88.24% (95% CI: 63.56% to 98.54%). The model found histological slides of suboptimal quality (e.g., those compromised during fixation or staining processes) to be the most challenging for accurate classification.

Conclusion: AutoML platforms offer a rapid and flexible approach to developing machine learning models, even with smaller datasets, as demonstrated in this study for SS. These platforms hold significant potential for enhancing diagnostic precision and efficiency in both clinical and research settings. Multicentric studies with larger patient cohorts are essential for thorough evaluation and validation of this innovative diagnostic approach.

Background: The exact cause of vitiligo is still unknown. Genetic factors, self-destruction of melanocytes, the autoimmune process, and oxidative stress all can contribute to the pathogenesis of vitiligo.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to figure out the frequency of coexisting autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases (AIIDs) in Egyptian patients with vitiligo and identify the associated risk factors.

Materials and methods: Egyptian children and adults with vitiligo and their parents were asked to answer a web-based survey. The survey consisted of multiple questions centered around demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data. The vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score was evaluated for all the patients. Patients were also asked about the presence of co-existing AIIDs.

Results: There was a total of 294 participants, mostly females (54.8%), with a median age of 35 years and a median disease duration of 9 years. Nearly 27% had at least one AIID. The most common associated AIIDs were autoimmune thyroid disease (47 patients, 16%), followed by alopecia areata (14 patients,4.8%), then psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis (11 patients, 3.7%). Univariate regression analysis revealed that age (OR 1.02, P = 0.036), female gender (OR 2.2, P = 0.004), disease duration (OR 1.04, P < 0.001), affected body surface area (OR 1.7, P = 0.048), and family history of AIIDs (OR 2.7, P < 0.001) were predictors for the presence of AIIDs in patients with vitiligo.

Conclusion: AIIDs are prevalent among vitiligo patients. Age, female gender, and family history of AIIDs are the main predictors of the presence of AIIDs in vitiligo patients.

Background: To provide evidence-based, up-to-date recommendations for physicians in primary and specialist healthcare setting in diagnosing and treating patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

Methods: The PMR working group conducted a narrative review of the available evidence in the field and wrote the draft guidelines. These guidelines were discussed and revised according to the standard operating procedures within the Norwegian Society of Rheumatology. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations for the management of PMR, the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines for the management for PMR, the treat-to-target recommendations in giant cell arteritis and PMR and the 2023 recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica were used in particular for purpose of harmonization.

Results: A total of 10 recommendations have been formulated covering initial diagnostic investigations, comorbidity assessment, imaging, specialist referral criteria, treatment involving glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing agents and follow-up care.

Conclusion: Norwegian recommendations for diagnostics and treatment to improve management and outcome in patients with PMR were developed.

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multifaceted autoimmune disorder characterized by diverse clinical manifestations, including a significant prevalence of headaches. This cross-sectional study aimed to thoroughly explore the relationship between SLE and headaches by analysing their prevalence, types, and associated clinical, immunological, and radiological factors.

Method: A comparative analysis was conducted on 179 SLE patients, who were categorized into two groups: those with headaches and those without. Data collection encompassed demographic details, disease activity levels, neurological assessments, immunological profiles, and brain imaging results. Headaches were diagnosed and classified following the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). Disease activity was measured using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant associations and correlations.

Results: Headaches were observed in 55% of the SLE patients, predominantly presenting as tension-type headaches (65%) and migraines (27%). Notably, no patients met the criteria for a lupus-specific headache. The Headache Group exhibited significantly higher disease activity (SLEDAI scores). Tension-type and migraine headaches were particularly associated with increased muco-cutaneous manifestations. The presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies was significantly linked to migraines and cluster headaches. While neurological disorders such as ischemic stroke and venous sinus thrombosis were more prevalent in the Headache Group, these findings were not statistically significant. Brain MRI abnormalities were detected in 9.4% of patients with headaches, including venous sinus thrombosis (2.3%), ischemic stroke (5.8%), and white matter hyperintensities (1.1%).

Conclusion: This study underscore es the complex relationship between SLE and headaches, suggesting that headaches may serve as an indicator of heightened SLE disease activity. Immunological factors, particularly aPL antibodies, show a strong association with specific headache types. MRI abnormalities further emphasize the intricate neurobiological aspects in SLE patients experiencing headaches. Continued research is essential to better understand biomarkers, genetic factors, and effective treatment strategies for managing headaches in SLE patients.

Background: Fibromyalgia and chronic primary low back pain are two chronic pain conditions with a significant biopsychosocial burden. Recently, the International Association for the Study of Pain has grouped them under the term chronic primary pain. To further explore similarities and differences between these two conditions, the objective of this scoping review is to explore the pain-related, physiological and psychological outcomes in individuals with fibromyalgia and low back pain.

Methods: The following databases were used to find relevant studies, using the PRISMA guidelines: Medline, Psycinfo, and CINAHL. Studies were included if they encompassed both participants with fibromyalgia or low back pain, with the objective to compare pain-related, physiological and/or psychological outcomes.

Results: Nineteen studies were selected for extraction. Among the 2801 participants, 968 had fibromyalgia (mean age 48.56 ± 7.97 years, with 94% being female) and 896 had low back pain (mean age 47.48 ± 8.15 years, with 80% being female). Pain sensitivity, physical dysfunction, illness perception, psychological distress, alexithymia, depression, and anxiety were generally more severe in participants with fibromyalgia. Most studies found similar levels of pain intensity, kinesiophobia, quality of pain, quality of life, impact of pain, suicidal risk, anger, and social support comparing individuals with fibromyalgia and individuals with low back pain.

Discussion: This scoping review highlights that although both conditions show similar pain intensity and impact on quality of life, fibromyalgia is associated with greater overall severity than low back pain, especially in sensitivity to pain and depression/anxiety.