Pub Date : 2026-05-06DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09917-4
Eunyoung Seo, Olga V Kim, Chansu Kim, Duguma Teshome Gemechu, Keun-Tae Kim, Sang Hoon Kang, Song Joo Lee
Purpose: The study aimed to investigate how different levels of supporting forces during the squat exercise at a self-selected speed, along with different knee angles, affect fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle activation for healthy young individuals.
Methods: Twelve healthy subjects participated in the study to measure fascicle length and pennation angle of the vastus lateralis (VL) at 0°, 60°, and 80° knee flexion. Leg muscle activities and the ground reaction force (GRF) were measured during squats using a squat aid machine with three supporting force levels.
Results: VL fascicle length and pennation angle at 0° knee flexion were significantly lower than at 60° and 80° flexion across all force levels (p < 0.05). Moreover, the leg muscles' mean maximum electromyography and the three-direction normalized GRFs measured on both the squat aid machine and the subjects' feet showed no significant variations across supporting forces.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that squat exercise has the potential to induce eccentric contraction by increasing fascicle length and muscle activation and decreasing pennation angle, regardless of the supporting force level. Therefore, a squat aid machine for squats is recommended as a safe and effective approach to enhance muscle force through eccentric contractions.
{"title":"Partial bodyweight-supported squats elicit eccentric contraction of the thigh muscles.","authors":"Eunyoung Seo, Olga V Kim, Chansu Kim, Duguma Teshome Gemechu, Keun-Tae Kim, Sang Hoon Kang, Song Joo Lee","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09917-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09917-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to investigate how different levels of supporting forces during the squat exercise at a self-selected speed, along with different knee angles, affect fascicle length, pennation angle, and muscle activation for healthy young individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve healthy subjects participated in the study to measure fascicle length and pennation angle of the vastus lateralis (VL) at 0°, 60°, and 80° knee flexion. Leg muscle activities and the ground reaction force (GRF) were measured during squats using a squat aid machine with three supporting force levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VL fascicle length and pennation angle at 0° knee flexion were significantly lower than at 60° and 80° flexion across all force levels (p < 0.05). Moreover, the leg muscles' mean maximum electromyography and the three-direction normalized GRFs measured on both the squat aid machine and the subjects' feet showed no significant variations across supporting forces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that squat exercise has the potential to induce eccentric contraction by increasing fascicle length and muscle activation and decreasing pennation angle, regardless of the supporting force level. Therefore, a squat aid machine for squats is recommended as a safe and effective approach to enhance muscle force through eccentric contractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-05-06DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09702-3
Sakineh Varmazyar
<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students often use smartphones for daily tasks, which can lead to awkward posture and musculoskeletal pain in the hand, wrist, and fingers due to prolonged use. This review aims to investigate the relationship between smartphone use and hand pain among university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this review, we collected and analyzed original English-language articles published between 2014 and 2024. Keywords were selected from the MeSH database. We excluded review articles, books, letters, reports, and other non-original sources, as well as studies that focused on mobile phones or populations other than university students and smartphone users. Additionally, articles addressing pain in other body parts, injuries, and complications from smartphone use, as well as those published during the COVID-19 pandemic, were also omitted. We utilized various keyword combinations related to "university", "students", "smartphone use", "addiction", "overuse", "hand", "pain", "musculoskeletal pain", "wrist", "fingers", "thumb", "risk factors", "characteristics", and "posture" in the search, along with the use of "AND", "OR", or no conjunctions, and the use of quotation marks for one, two, or a few keywords. Literature was obtained from databases such as Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest. A total of 18 studies were selected from 390 primary literature sources, following the PRISMA framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 393 articles were found in the initial search. Duplicate articles were removed, leaving 259 that were examined according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After assessing the relevance of titles and abstracts, screening, and qualitatively evaluating journals, 18 articles were included in the study. Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey had the highest number of articles (n = 3 or 16.6% of articles). The age group investigated was 18 to 26 years old. Based on the identified risk factors, the articles were discussed in three groups: (1) role of smartphone duration, addiction, and hand pain (83.3% of studies investigated the duration of smartphone use, while 38.8% surveyed smartphone addiction), (2) the effect of smartphone holding posture on the hand and hand pain (38.8% of studies), and (3) the relation of smartphone physical characteristics to hand pain (27.7% of studies). Daily usage duration ranged from less than or equal to 4 h/day (53.2%) to 7 h or more (73.9%). The reported range of smartphone addiction among students was between 15.9% and 66.6%. The reported prevalence of wrist, hand, and thumb pain was 19.2% to 68.7%. Between 14.75% and 41% of students use their right hand to hold smartphones and type with their right thumb, while 24% to 77.79% use both hands and both thumbs. The size and weight of smartphones can predict hand pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The amount of time spent using a smartphone, how it is held, how long it has been
背景:大学生经常在日常工作中使用智能手机,这可能会导致尴尬的姿势,并且由于长时间使用,手、手腕和手指的肌肉骨骼疼痛。本综述旨在调查大学生智能手机使用与手部疼痛之间的关系。方法:在本综述中,我们收集并分析了2014年至2024年间发表的英语原创文章。关键词从MeSH数据库中选取。我们排除了评论文章、书籍、信件、报告和其他非原始来源,以及关注移动电话或大学生和智能手机用户以外人群的研究。此外,关于身体其他部位疼痛、受伤、使用智能手机并发症的文章以及在COVID-19大流行期间发表的文章也被省略了。我们在搜索中使用了与“大学”、“学生”、“智能手机使用”、“成瘾”、“过度使用”、“手”、“疼痛”、“肌肉骨骼疼痛”、“手腕”、“手指”、“拇指”、“风险因素”、“特征”和“姿势”相关的各种关键字组合,同时使用“and”、“OR”或无连词,并在一个、两个或几个关键字上使用引号。文献来自Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Scopus、PubMed和ProQuest等数据库。根据PRISMA框架,从390个主要文献来源中选择了18项研究。结果:初始检索共检索到393篇文章。删除重复的文章,留下259篇根据纳入和排除标准进行检查。在评估标题和摘要的相关性、筛选和定性评估期刊后,18篇文章被纳入研究。巴西、沙特阿拉伯和土耳其的文章数量最多(n = 3,占文章的16.6%)。调查的年龄组为18至26岁。根据确定的危险因素,文章分为三组进行讨论:(1)智能手机使用时长、成瘾和手痛的作用(83.3%的研究调查了智能手机使用时长,38.8%的研究调查了智能手机成瘾),(2)持智能手机姿势对手和手痛的影响(38.8%的研究),(3)智能手机物理特征与手痛的关系(27.7%的研究)。每日使用时长从少于或等于4小时/天(53.2%)到7小时或以上(73.9%)不等。据报道,学生中智能手机成瘾的比例在15.9%到66.6%之间。腕部、手部和拇指疼痛的发生率为19.2%至68.7%。14.75%到41%的学生用右手拿智能手机,用右手拇指打字,24%到77.79%的学生用双手和大拇指打字。智能手机的大小和重量可以预测手部疼痛。结论:使用智能手机的时间、使用方式、使用时间、智能手机成瘾、持有姿势、频繁的拇指运动、首选的手位、屏幕大小、智能手机的重量以及与智能手机相关的使用目的都是可能导致手、手腕、手掌、拇指和其他手指疼痛的风险因素。
{"title":"Smartphone use and related factors with hand pain among university students: a systematic review.","authors":"Sakineh Varmazyar","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09702-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09702-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students often use smartphones for daily tasks, which can lead to awkward posture and musculoskeletal pain in the hand, wrist, and fingers due to prolonged use. This review aims to investigate the relationship between smartphone use and hand pain among university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this review, we collected and analyzed original English-language articles published between 2014 and 2024. Keywords were selected from the MeSH database. We excluded review articles, books, letters, reports, and other non-original sources, as well as studies that focused on mobile phones or populations other than university students and smartphone users. Additionally, articles addressing pain in other body parts, injuries, and complications from smartphone use, as well as those published during the COVID-19 pandemic, were also omitted. We utilized various keyword combinations related to \"university\", \"students\", \"smartphone use\", \"addiction\", \"overuse\", \"hand\", \"pain\", \"musculoskeletal pain\", \"wrist\", \"fingers\", \"thumb\", \"risk factors\", \"characteristics\", and \"posture\" in the search, along with the use of \"AND\", \"OR\", or no conjunctions, and the use of quotation marks for one, two, or a few keywords. Literature was obtained from databases such as Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest. A total of 18 studies were selected from 390 primary literature sources, following the PRISMA framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 393 articles were found in the initial search. Duplicate articles were removed, leaving 259 that were examined according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. After assessing the relevance of titles and abstracts, screening, and qualitatively evaluating journals, 18 articles were included in the study. Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey had the highest number of articles (n = 3 or 16.6% of articles). The age group investigated was 18 to 26 years old. Based on the identified risk factors, the articles were discussed in three groups: (1) role of smartphone duration, addiction, and hand pain (83.3% of studies investigated the duration of smartphone use, while 38.8% surveyed smartphone addiction), (2) the effect of smartphone holding posture on the hand and hand pain (38.8% of studies), and (3) the relation of smartphone physical characteristics to hand pain (27.7% of studies). Daily usage duration ranged from less than or equal to 4 h/day (53.2%) to 7 h or more (73.9%). The reported range of smartphone addiction among students was between 15.9% and 66.6%. The reported prevalence of wrist, hand, and thumb pain was 19.2% to 68.7%. Between 14.75% and 41% of students use their right hand to hold smartphones and type with their right thumb, while 24% to 77.79% use both hands and both thumbs. The size and weight of smartphones can predict hand pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The amount of time spent using a smartphone, how it is held, how long it has been","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common disabling hip disorder with an annually increasing incidence due to factors such as corticosteroid administration. Core decompression is an effective surgical intervention for early-stage ONFH, and robot-assisted technology can enhance the accuracy and minimally invasiveness of this procedure. However, its clinical efficacy requires comprehensive evaluation with high-quality evidence. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted core decompression (RACD) in the treatment of ONFH.
Methods: We systematically searched Chinese and English databases up to December 1, 2025, for case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on RACD for ONFH. The primary outcome was the femoral head collapse rate; secondary outcomes included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses conducted to verify results.
Results: A total of 12 studies were included (1 RCT, 9 cohort studies, 2 case series), involving 325 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the overall femoral head collapse rate after robot-assisted core decompression was 9% (95% CI: 7%-13%). In the subgroup of ARCO Stage II patients with follow-up > 1 year, the femoral head collapse rate was 12% (95% CI: 8%-17%). The mean postoperative improvement in HHS was 17.38 points (95% CI: 14.40-20.37), and the mean postoperative improvement in VAS score was 2.75 points (95% CI: 2.01-3.50). No complications such as infection or neurovascular injury were reported in any of the studies that reported complications (n = 7, 222 patients in total). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. Egger's test suggested potential publication bias for HHS, VAS, and femoral head collapse rate; however, the adjusted effect sizes still supported clinical benefit. Given the high heterogeneity, the adjusted effect sizes should be interpreted with caution.
Conclusion: Available evidence supports the effectiveness of robot-assisted core decompression in the treatment of early-stage ONFH. RACD yields functional improvement and pain relief in patients with ONFH, with acceptable short-to-medium-term safety. Current evidence, however, are insufficient to confirm that RACD yields superior hip preservation efficacy compared with MCD. Further direct, high-quality comparative studies are required to determine and quantify the benefits of RACD compared to MCD.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis of single-arm studies.","authors":"Huan Liu, Dawei Jiang, Feng Wang, Zheming Bao, Hao Xing, Bo Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09777-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12891-026-09777-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common disabling hip disorder with an annually increasing incidence due to factors such as corticosteroid administration. Core decompression is an effective surgical intervention for early-stage ONFH, and robot-assisted technology can enhance the accuracy and minimally invasiveness of this procedure. However, its clinical efficacy requires comprehensive evaluation with high-quality evidence. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted core decompression (RACD) in the treatment of ONFH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Chinese and English databases up to December 1, 2025, for case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on RACD for ONFH. The primary outcome was the femoral head collapse rate; secondary outcomes included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses conducted to verify results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies were included (1 RCT, 9 cohort studies, 2 case series), involving 325 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the overall femoral head collapse rate after robot-assisted core decompression was 9% (95% CI: 7%-13%). In the subgroup of ARCO Stage II patients with follow-up > 1 year, the femoral head collapse rate was 12% (95% CI: 8%-17%). The mean postoperative improvement in HHS was 17.38 points (95% CI: 14.40-20.37), and the mean postoperative improvement in VAS score was 2.75 points (95% CI: 2.01-3.50). No complications such as infection or neurovascular injury were reported in any of the studies that reported complications (n = 7, 222 patients in total). Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. Egger's test suggested potential publication bias for HHS, VAS, and femoral head collapse rate; however, the adjusted effect sizes still supported clinical benefit. Given the high heterogeneity, the adjusted effect sizes should be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Available evidence supports the effectiveness of robot-assisted core decompression in the treatment of early-stage ONFH. RACD yields functional improvement and pain relief in patients with ONFH, with acceptable short-to-medium-term safety. Current evidence, however, are insufficient to confirm that RACD yields superior hip preservation efficacy compared with MCD. Further direct, high-quality comparative studies are required to determine and quantify the benefits of RACD compared to MCD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD420251266114).</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13151216/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-05-06DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09911-w
Jinhui Bu, Li Yang, Qing Shi, Yongfu Wang, Jiewei Song, Youzhi He, Yuxia Xu
Objective: To assess the effect of postoperative anti-osteoporosis therapy on titanium mesh subsidence and bone fusion time after anterior cervical surgery for spinal tuberculosis.
Methods: In this retrospective study, 66 patients undergoing anterior cervical debridement with bone grafting and fixation (2020-2024) were divided into two groups: Group A (full-course anti-osteoporosis therapy, n = 33) and Group B (no/incomplete therapy, n = 33). The primary endpoints were titanium mesh subsidence and bone fusion time. Secondary endpoints included VAS score, NDI score, Frankel grade, bone mineral density, and radiographic alignment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared.
Results: The mean follow-up was 12.5 months. Neurological function (Frankel score) improved in all patients. The titanium mesh subsidence rate was significantly lower in Group A (21.2%) than in Group B (45.3%). Bone fusion time was significantly shorter in Group A (3.5 ± 0.3 months) versus Group B (4.8 ± 0.5 months). Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS and NDI scores. Radiographic alignment was satisfactory. Bone mineral density improved significantly in Group A compared to both its baseline and Group B.
Conclusion: Anterior cervical surgery is effective for spinal tuberculosis. Postoperative standardized anti-osteoporosis therapy further improves outcomes by reducing implant subsidence and accelerating bone fusion, offering significant clinical benefit.
{"title":"Efficacy of anti-osteoporosis therapy after anterior surgery for cervical spinal tuberculosis.","authors":"Jinhui Bu, Li Yang, Qing Shi, Yongfu Wang, Jiewei Song, Youzhi He, Yuxia Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09911-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09911-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of postoperative anti-osteoporosis therapy on titanium mesh subsidence and bone fusion time after anterior cervical surgery for spinal tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 66 patients undergoing anterior cervical debridement with bone grafting and fixation (2020-2024) were divided into two groups: Group A (full-course anti-osteoporosis therapy, n = 33) and Group B (no/incomplete therapy, n = 33). The primary endpoints were titanium mesh subsidence and bone fusion time. Secondary endpoints included VAS score, NDI score, Frankel grade, bone mineral density, and radiographic alignment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 12.5 months. Neurological function (Frankel score) improved in all patients. The titanium mesh subsidence rate was significantly lower in Group A (21.2%) than in Group B (45.3%). Bone fusion time was significantly shorter in Group A (3.5 ± 0.3 months) versus Group B (4.8 ± 0.5 months). Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS and NDI scores. Radiographic alignment was satisfactory. Bone mineral density improved significantly in Group A compared to both its baseline and Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior cervical surgery is effective for spinal tuberculosis. Postoperative standardized anti-osteoporosis therapy further improves outcomes by reducing implant subsidence and accelerating bone fusion, offering significant clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: To determine whether adjunctive blood flow restriction (BFR) training during postoperative weeks 13-20 is associated with differences in functional, strength, balance, muscle morphology, and neuromuscular outcomes compared with sham BFR following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
Methods: In this single-centre randomized controlled trial, 48 patients aged 18-35 years who underwent primary unilateral ACLR were randomly assigned to a BFR group or a Sham-BFR group. From postoperative weeks 13 to 20, both groups performed identical low-load resistance training (30% one-repetition maximum) twice weekly. The BFR group received individualized blood flow restriction at 40% arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the Sham-BFR group underwent the same protocol with minimal cuff pressure. Outcomes assessed at postoperative week 24 included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale, knee range of motion (ROM), isometric knee extensor and flexor strength, quadriceps muscle thickness, Y-Balance Test performance, and quadriceps surface electromyography (sEMG).
Results: Forty-three patients completed the study (BFR, n = 21; Sham-BFR, n = 22). At 24 weeks postoperatively, the BFR group demonstrated statistically significantly higher IKDC score and Tegner Activity Scale than the Sham-BFR group (p < 0.01). Knee extensor and flexor strength, Y-Balance Test composite scores, and quadriceps sEMG amplitudes were also significantly greater in the BFR group (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in knee ROM or quadriceps muscle thickness.
Conclusion: Adjunctive BFR training during mid-stage ACLR rehabilitation was associated with more favourable functional, strength, balance, and neuromuscular outcomes than sham BFR at 24 weeks postoperatively. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because baseline outcome measurements and immediate post-intervention assessments were not available.
{"title":"Blood flow restriction as an adjunct during mid-stage rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: a randomized sham-controlled study.","authors":"Qun-Ya Zheng, Liang Chen, Yan-Song Zhu, Rui-Song Wang, Peng Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09908-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09908-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether adjunctive blood flow restriction (BFR) training during postoperative weeks 13-20 is associated with differences in functional, strength, balance, muscle morphology, and neuromuscular outcomes compared with sham BFR following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre randomized controlled trial, 48 patients aged 18-35 years who underwent primary unilateral ACLR were randomly assigned to a BFR group or a Sham-BFR group. From postoperative weeks 13 to 20, both groups performed identical low-load resistance training (30% one-repetition maximum) twice weekly. The BFR group received individualized blood flow restriction at 40% arterial occlusion pressure, whereas the Sham-BFR group underwent the same protocol with minimal cuff pressure. Outcomes assessed at postoperative week 24 included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale, knee range of motion (ROM), isometric knee extensor and flexor strength, quadriceps muscle thickness, Y-Balance Test performance, and quadriceps surface electromyography (sEMG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients completed the study (BFR, n = 21; Sham-BFR, n = 22). At 24 weeks postoperatively, the BFR group demonstrated statistically significantly higher IKDC score and Tegner Activity Scale than the Sham-BFR group (p < 0.01). Knee extensor and flexor strength, Y-Balance Test composite scores, and quadriceps sEMG amplitudes were also significantly greater in the BFR group (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in knee ROM or quadriceps muscle thickness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunctive BFR training during mid-stage ACLR rehabilitation was associated with more favourable functional, strength, balance, and neuromuscular outcomes than sham BFR at 24 weeks postoperatively. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because baseline outcome measurements and immediate post-intervention assessments were not available.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>(Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn), No. ChiCTR2400087631, 31/07/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Accurate, objective assessment of hip joint range of motion (ROM) is essential for orthopedic diagnosis and rehabilitation. Conventional tools, such as goniometers, are limited by subjectivity, inter-observer variability, and poor compatibility with telemedicine applications. This study aimed to develop and validate a markerless, video-based system for estimating hip joint ROM by integrating human pose estimation (MediaPipe) with machine-learning models using inertial sensor data as the reference standard. Twenty healthy adult males performed hip flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation movements. Skeletal coordinates extracted from the videos were converted into geometric features and used to train five regression models (linear regression, ElasticNet, support vector regression, random forest, and LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean absolute error (MAE), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Among the evaluated models, tree-based methods showed high predictive accuracy, and LightGBM was used for subsequent interpretability analyses across all directions of hip ROM (R² up to 0.94; MAE 4-6°), while inertial sensor validation confirmed high measurement accuracy of the reference data. SHAP analysis revealed that distinct geometric descriptors dominated flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation, indicating direction-specific biomechanical determinants of hip motion. These findings demonstrate that markerless, video-based estimation of hip ROM is feasible with promising accuracy and highlight the potential of this approach for telemedicine, remote rehabilitation monitoring, and future integration into gait and musculoskeletal modeling workflows.
{"title":"Accurate estimation of hip range of motion using MediaPipe and inertial sensors with machine learning models.","authors":"Takuma Maeda, Tomoyuki Kamenaga, Atsuyuki Inui, Toshiki Kitamura, Yuichi Kuroda, Masanori Tsubosaka, Naoki Nakano, Shinya Hayashi, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Ryosuke Kuroda","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09915-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09915-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate, objective assessment of hip joint range of motion (ROM) is essential for orthopedic diagnosis and rehabilitation. Conventional tools, such as goniometers, are limited by subjectivity, inter-observer variability, and poor compatibility with telemedicine applications. This study aimed to develop and validate a markerless, video-based system for estimating hip joint ROM by integrating human pose estimation (MediaPipe) with machine-learning models using inertial sensor data as the reference standard. Twenty healthy adult males performed hip flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation movements. Skeletal coordinates extracted from the videos were converted into geometric features and used to train five regression models (linear regression, ElasticNet, support vector regression, random forest, and LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean absolute error (MAE), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret feature contributions. Among the evaluated models, tree-based methods showed high predictive accuracy, and LightGBM was used for subsequent interpretability analyses across all directions of hip ROM (R² up to 0.94; MAE 4-6°), while inertial sensor validation confirmed high measurement accuracy of the reference data. SHAP analysis revealed that distinct geometric descriptors dominated flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation, indicating direction-specific biomechanical determinants of hip motion. These findings demonstrate that markerless, video-based estimation of hip ROM is feasible with promising accuracy and highlight the potential of this approach for telemedicine, remote rehabilitation monitoring, and future integration into gait and musculoskeletal modeling workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) after rotator cuff repair surgery and to explore its potential risk factors.
Methods: Search the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 1, 2025, for all studies reporting the prevalence of PSS after rotator cuff repair surgery and its associated risk factors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.
Results: Eight cohort studies involving 21,033 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) after rotator cuff repair was 17% (95% CI: 9%-24%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 98.2%). Subgroup analysis by continent showed variation in reported prevalence estimates across regions, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously because some subgroups were based on a limited number of studies. Additional subgroup analyses according to sample size, publication year, and mean age were conducted to explore heterogeneity. In the sample size subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence was 14% (95% CI: 2%-25%) in studies with a sample size ≥ 300 and 18% (95% CI: 15%-21%) in studies with a sample size < 300, with lower heterogeneity in the latter subgroup. By contrast, subgroup analyses by publication year and mean age did not materially reduce heterogeneity. In pooled analyses of adjusted effect estimates, age < 50 years (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), female sex (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.03-2.68), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.75-4.26) were associated with PSS; however, the effect size for age < 50 years was small.
Conclusion: PSS after rotator cuff repair is not uncommon, but the pooled prevalence should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial heterogeneity and inconsistent diagnostic definitions across studies. Female sex and diabetes mellitus may be associated with PSS, whereas the clinical relevance of the association with age < 50 years appears limited. Further high-quality prospective studies are required.
{"title":"Prevalence and risk factors of shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Xin-Lei Tang, Yi-Lin Wang, Zhong-You Zhang, Xuan Cheng, Si-Yuan Gao, Sheng Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09856-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09856-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) after rotator cuff repair surgery and to explore its potential risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 1, 2025, for all studies reporting the prevalence of PSS after rotator cuff repair surgery and its associated risk factors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight cohort studies involving 21,033 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of postoperative shoulder stiffness (PSS) after rotator cuff repair was 17% (95% CI: 9%-24%), with substantial heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 98.2%). Subgroup analysis by continent showed variation in reported prevalence estimates across regions, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously because some subgroups were based on a limited number of studies. Additional subgroup analyses according to sample size, publication year, and mean age were conducted to explore heterogeneity. In the sample size subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence was 14% (95% CI: 2%-25%) in studies with a sample size ≥ 300 and 18% (95% CI: 15%-21%) in studies with a sample size < 300, with lower heterogeneity in the latter subgroup. By contrast, subgroup analyses by publication year and mean age did not materially reduce heterogeneity. In pooled analyses of adjusted effect estimates, age < 50 years (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), female sex (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.03-2.68), and diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.75-4.26) were associated with PSS; however, the effect size for age < 50 years was small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSS after rotator cuff repair is not uncommon, but the pooled prevalence should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial heterogeneity and inconsistent diagnostic definitions across studies. Female sex and diabetes mellitus may be associated with PSS, whereas the clinical relevance of the association with age < 50 years appears limited. Further high-quality prospective studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Differentiating acute from chronic wedge-shaped thoracolumbar vertebral deformities on conventional lateral lumbar radiographs remains clinically challenging, especially when osteoporosis status also needs to be considered. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a You Only Look Once (YOLO)v8n framework for vertebral-level detection and classification of thoracolumbar fractures with osteoporosis-related stratification on lateral lumbar radiographs.
Methods: We retrospectively collected 1352 lateral lumbar radiographs from 1352 patients, with one radiograph per patient. A total of 1774 vertebral fracture segments were manually annotated. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used as reference standards to stratify vertebral targets into three categories: acute fracture with osteoporosis, acute fracture without osteoporosis and chronic fracture with osteoporosis. The dataset was divided into training and validation subsets at the patient level. A YOLOv8n detector was trained as the primary model. To strengthen methodological rigor, additional baseline comparison experiments were conducted under the same patient-level training/validation split using YOLOv5n and Faster R-CNN. Detection performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, mean average precision (mAP) 50 and mAP50-95.
Results: On the validation set, the YOLOv8n model achieved a precision of 0.495, recall of 0.482, F1-score of 0.490, mAP50 of 0.506, and mAP50-95 of 0.397. In comparative experiments, YOLOv5n achieved a precision of 0.451, recall of 0.549, F1-score of 0.495, mAP50 of 0.494, and mAP50-95 of 0.367, whereas Faster R-CNN achieved a precision of 0.273, recall of 0.814, F1-score of 0.409, mAP50 of 0.300, and mAP50-95 of 0.217. These findings indicate that YOLOv8n provided the most balanced overall detection performance in the present dataset.
Conclusion: The proposed YOLOv8n framework demonstrated preliminary feasibility for automated vertebral-level detection and classification of thoracolumbar fractures with osteoporosis-related stratification on lateral lumbar radiographs. However, given the moderate overall performance and lack of external validation, the current model should be regarded as an assistive screening tool rather than a standalone diagnostic system.
背景:在常规腰椎侧位片上区分急性和慢性楔形胸腰椎畸形在临床上仍然具有挑战性,特别是当骨质疏松症也需要考虑时。本研究旨在开发和评估You Only Look Once (YOLO)v8n框架,用于腰椎侧位x线片上骨质疏松相关分层的胸腰椎骨折的椎骨水平检测和分类。方法:回顾性收集1352例患者的1352张侧位腰椎x线片,每位患者一张。手工注释了1774个椎体骨折节段。以腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)和双能x线骨密度仪(DXA)作为参考标准,将椎体靶点分为急性骨折伴骨质疏松、急性骨折无骨质疏松和慢性骨折伴骨质疏松三类。数据集在患者水平上分为训练和验证子集。以YOLOv8n探测器作为主要模型进行训练。为了加强方法的严严性,在相同的患者水平训练/验证分割下,使用YOLOv5n和Faster R-CNN进行了额外的基线比较实验。采用精密度、召回率、f1评分、平均平均精密度(mAP) 50和mAP50-95对检测性能进行评估。结果:在验证集上,YOLOv8n模型的准确率为0.495,召回率为0.482,f1评分为0.490,mAP50为0.506,mAP50-95为0.397。对比实验中,YOLOv5n的准确率为0.451,召回率为0.549,F1-score为0.495,mAP50为0.494,mAP50-95为0.367,而Faster R-CNN的准确率为0.273,召回率为0.814,F1-score为0.409,mAP50为0.300,mAP50-95为0.217。这些发现表明,YOLOv8n在当前数据集中提供了最平衡的整体检测性能。结论:提出的YOLOv8n框架初步证明了在侧位腰椎x线片上对伴有骨质疏松相关分层的胸腰椎骨折进行椎体水平自动检测和分类的可行性。然而,鉴于整体表现不佳且缺乏外部验证,目前的模型应被视为辅助筛查工具,而不是独立的诊断系统。
{"title":"Application of a YOLOv8-based model on lateral lumbar radiographs for screening of acute and chronic thoracolumbar fractures and osteoporosis.","authors":"Baisen Chen, Yukang Cheng, Jiaming Cui, Chunyan Ji, Yuyu Sun, Zhiming Cui, Guanhua Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09845-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09845-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differentiating acute from chronic wedge-shaped thoracolumbar vertebral deformities on conventional lateral lumbar radiographs remains clinically challenging, especially when osteoporosis status also needs to be considered. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a You Only Look Once (YOLO)v8n framework for vertebral-level detection and classification of thoracolumbar fractures with osteoporosis-related stratification on lateral lumbar radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected 1352 lateral lumbar radiographs from 1352 patients, with one radiograph per patient. A total of 1774 vertebral fracture segments were manually annotated. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used as reference standards to stratify vertebral targets into three categories: acute fracture with osteoporosis, acute fracture without osteoporosis and chronic fracture with osteoporosis. The dataset was divided into training and validation subsets at the patient level. A YOLOv8n detector was trained as the primary model. To strengthen methodological rigor, additional baseline comparison experiments were conducted under the same patient-level training/validation split using YOLOv5n and Faster R-CNN. Detection performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, mean average precision (mAP) 50 and mAP50-95.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the validation set, the YOLOv8n model achieved a precision of 0.495, recall of 0.482, F1-score of 0.490, mAP50 of 0.506, and mAP50-95 of 0.397. In comparative experiments, YOLOv5n achieved a precision of 0.451, recall of 0.549, F1-score of 0.495, mAP50 of 0.494, and mAP50-95 of 0.367, whereas Faster R-CNN achieved a precision of 0.273, recall of 0.814, F1-score of 0.409, mAP50 of 0.300, and mAP50-95 of 0.217. These findings indicate that YOLOv8n provided the most balanced overall detection performance in the present dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed YOLOv8n framework demonstrated preliminary feasibility for automated vertebral-level detection and classification of thoracolumbar fractures with osteoporosis-related stratification on lateral lumbar radiographs. However, given the moderate overall performance and lack of external validation, the current model should be regarded as an assistive screening tool rather than a standalone diagnostic system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Subtrochanteric femur fractures are challenging to treat due to complex anatomy and high mechanical stresses. Cephalomedullary nailing is the standard treatment, often performed with the patient supine on a traction table, but this can prolong setup and cause complications (pressure or nerve injuries). Lateral decubitus positioning without a traction table may facilitate reduction and reduce traction-related risks, yet comparative data in subtrochanteric fractures are limited. This study compared outcomes of lateral decubitus versus traction table positioning for subtrochanteric fracture nailing.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 68 patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails. Patients underwent surgery supine on a traction table (n = 37) or in lateral decubitus without a traction table (n = 31). Operative metrics (entry point determination time, operative time, fluoroscopy duration, and blood loss) and postoperative outcomes (transfusion requirements, time to mobilization, complications, and final Harris Hip Score) were compared between groups.
Results: Lateral decubitus positioning was associated with shorter entry-point determination time (median 2 vs. 7 min; p = 0.05), shorter operating-room time (80.3 ± 23.6 vs. 108.2 ± 23.2 min; p = 0.03), reduced fluoroscopy time (151.2 ± 19.2 vs. 178.2 ± 16.1 s; p = 0.03), and lower estimated blood loss (752 ± 346 vs. 1459 ± 611 mL; p = 0.01) compared with traction-table positioning. No statistically significant differences were observed in transfusion requirements, time to mobilization, final Harris Hip Score, or complication rates (all p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Compared with traction-table positioning, lateral decubitus cephalomedullary nailing was associated with better functional outcome, shorter operative and fluoroscopy times, and lower estimated blood loss, while union and complication rates were similar between groups. These findings suggest that lateral decubitus positioning is a viable alternative for subtrochanteric fracture fixation, particularly when traction-table setup may compromise operating-room efficiency. Given the observational design and potential confounding related to reduction techniques and surgeon factors, these findings should be interpreted as associations; prospective studies are warranted.
背景:股骨转子下骨折由于复杂的解剖结构和高机械应力,治疗具有挑战性。颅髓内钉是标准的治疗方法,通常患者仰卧在牵引台上进行,但这可能延长安装时间并导致并发症(压力或神经损伤)。无牵引台的侧卧位可促进复位并降低牵引相关风险,但转子下骨折的比较数据有限。本研究比较了外侧卧位与牵引台定位治疗转子下骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性队列研究纳入68例股骨粗隆下骨折患者,采用头髓内钉治疗。患者在牵引台上仰卧(n = 37)或在没有牵引台上侧卧(n = 31)进行手术。比较两组之间的手术指标(切入点确定时间、手术时间、透视时间和出血量)和术后结果(输血需求、活动时间、并发症和最终Harris髋关节评分)。结果:与牵引台定位相比,侧卧位与更短的切入点确定时间(中位2 vs. 7 min, p = 0.05)、更短的手术室时间(80.3±23.6 vs. 108.2±23.2 min, p = 0.03)、更短的透视时间(151.2±19.2 vs. 178.2±16.1 s, p = 0.03)、更低的估计失血量(752±346 vs. 1459±611 mL, p = 0.01)相关。输血需要量、活动时间、Harris髋关节评分和并发症发生率均无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。结论:与牵引台定位相比,侧卧头髓内钉具有更好的功能结局,更短的手术和透视时间,更低的估计出血量,两组愈合率和并发症发生率相似。这些研究结果表明,侧卧位是转子下骨折固定的可行选择,特别是当牵引台设置可能会影响手术室效率时。考虑到观察设计和与复位技术和外科医生因素相关的潜在混淆,这些发现应被解释为关联;前瞻性研究是必要的。
{"title":"Lateral decubitus positioning was associated with improved efficiency and functional outcome compared with traction table positioning for cephalomedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective comparative study.","authors":"Hamit Çağlayan Kahraman, Emre Bilgin, Onur Gültekin, Öykü Merve Yavuz, Olcay Yavuz, Barış Yılmaz","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09843-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12891-026-09843-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtrochanteric femur fractures are challenging to treat due to complex anatomy and high mechanical stresses. Cephalomedullary nailing is the standard treatment, often performed with the patient supine on a traction table, but this can prolong setup and cause complications (pressure or nerve injuries). Lateral decubitus positioning without a traction table may facilitate reduction and reduce traction-related risks, yet comparative data in subtrochanteric fractures are limited. This study compared outcomes of lateral decubitus versus traction table positioning for subtrochanteric fracture nailing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study included 68 patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails. Patients underwent surgery supine on a traction table (n = 37) or in lateral decubitus without a traction table (n = 31). Operative metrics (entry point determination time, operative time, fluoroscopy duration, and blood loss) and postoperative outcomes (transfusion requirements, time to mobilization, complications, and final Harris Hip Score) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lateral decubitus positioning was associated with shorter entry-point determination time (median 2 vs. 7 min; p = 0.05), shorter operating-room time (80.3 ± 23.6 vs. 108.2 ± 23.2 min; p = 0.03), reduced fluoroscopy time (151.2 ± 19.2 vs. 178.2 ± 16.1 s; p = 0.03), and lower estimated blood loss (752 ± 346 vs. 1459 ± 611 mL; p = 0.01) compared with traction-table positioning. No statistically significant differences were observed in transfusion requirements, time to mobilization, final Harris Hip Score, or complication rates (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with traction-table positioning, lateral decubitus cephalomedullary nailing was associated with better functional outcome, shorter operative and fluoroscopy times, and lower estimated blood loss, while union and complication rates were similar between groups. These findings suggest that lateral decubitus positioning is a viable alternative for subtrochanteric fracture fixation, particularly when traction-table setup may compromise operating-room efficiency. Given the observational design and potential confounding related to reduction techniques and surgeon factors, these findings should be interpreted as associations; prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13154632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-05-04DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09886-8
Rien Fredrik Ragnar Avenarius, Edvard Johan Enoksen, Karen Rosendahl
Background: Epidemiological data on injuries and fractures in children under two years of age is limited, thus, we aimed to explore the incidence, patterns and mechanisms.
Methods: Retrospective, population-based cross-sectional study including children under two, seen at the A&E department due to a trauma, or having a radiograph due to birth trauma. All radiographs were re-reviewed.
Results: Four hundred thirty children (49.8% female), mean age 14.7 months (SD 6.8), were included, of whom four had a high-energy trauma and 42 were birth-related. Of 388 children (50.3% female) (mean age 16.3 months, SD 5.1 months) with non-birth related injury, 163 (42.0%) had a fracture (annual incidence 4.3 per 1,000 children; 2.4 per 1,000 infants vs. 6.1 per 1,000 children aged 12 to 24 months of age. 47/163 (28.8%) fractures involved the forearm and 41 (25.2%) involved the leg. Fracture mechanisms 39.9% fall from more than own height/furniture; 17.2% fall from own height, 6.7% crush injury and 6.1% dropped by parent. In 12.9% of the traumas, no mechanism was provided. The number of fractures increased significantly by age group (p=0.027), and the distribution differed, with skull fractures predominating in 0-6-months-old (33.0%), clavicle fractures (33.0%) in 6-12-months-old and forearm fractures in the two older age groups (35.0% and 34.4%, respectively) (p < 0.001). No classic metaphyseal lesions were found in the entire cohort. Four children, all of whom had radiological "red flags", had inflicted injury. Forty-two children had birth-related injury, of whom 50.0% had a fracture (1.1 per 1,000 live births).
Conclusions: Fractures in infants are rare, in particular classic metaphyseal fractures. The occurrence of radiological "red flags" should raise suspicion of non-accidental injury and instigate further assessment.
{"title":"Incidence, pattern and mechanisms of injuries and fractures in children under two years of age: a population-based study.","authors":"Rien Fredrik Ragnar Avenarius, Edvard Johan Enoksen, Karen Rosendahl","doi":"10.1186/s12891-026-09886-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09886-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epidemiological data on injuries and fractures in children under two years of age is limited, thus, we aimed to explore the incidence, patterns and mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, population-based cross-sectional study including children under two, seen at the A&E department due to a trauma, or having a radiograph due to birth trauma. All radiographs were re-reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred thirty children (49.8% female), mean age 14.7 months (SD 6.8), were included, of whom four had a high-energy trauma and 42 were birth-related. Of 388 children (50.3% female) (mean age 16.3 months, SD 5.1 months) with non-birth related injury, 163 (42.0%) had a fracture (annual incidence 4.3 per 1,000 children; 2.4 per 1,000 infants vs. 6.1 per 1,000 children aged 12 to 24 months of age. 47/163 (28.8%) fractures involved the forearm and 41 (25.2%) involved the leg. Fracture mechanisms 39.9% fall from more than own height/furniture; 17.2% fall from own height, 6.7% crush injury and 6.1% dropped by parent. In 12.9% of the traumas, no mechanism was provided. The number of fractures increased significantly by age group (p=0.027), and the distribution differed, with skull fractures predominating in 0-6-months-old (33.0%), clavicle fractures (33.0%) in 6-12-months-old and forearm fractures in the two older age groups (35.0% and 34.4%, respectively) (p < 0.001). No classic metaphyseal lesions were found in the entire cohort. Four children, all of whom had radiological \"red flags\", had inflicted injury. Forty-two children had birth-related injury, of whom 50.0% had a fracture (1.1 per 1,000 live births).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fractures in infants are rare, in particular classic metaphyseal fractures. The occurrence of radiological \"red flags\" should raise suspicion of non-accidental injury and instigate further assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147833679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}