Pub Date : 2022-04-11DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03979-1
Markus Zdolsek, Patrick Y Wuethrich, Michaela Gunnström, Joachim H Zdolsek, Emma Hasselgren, Christian M Beilstein, Dominique Engel, Robert G Hahn
Background: The transcapillary leakage of albumin is increased by inflammation and major surgery, but whether exogenous albumin also disappears faster is unclear.
Methods: An intravenous infusion of 3 mL/kg of 20% albumin was given over 30 min to 70 subjects consisting of 15 healthy volunteers, 15 post-burn patients, 15 patients who underwent surgery with minor bleeding, 10 who underwent surgery with major bleeding (mean, 1.1 L) and 15 postoperative patients. Blood Hb and plasma albumin were measured on 15 occasions over 5 h. The rate of albumin disappearance from the plasma was quantitated with population kinetic methodology and reported as the half-life (T1/2).
Results: No differences were observed for T1/2 between volunteers, post-burn patients, patients who underwent surgery with minor bleeding and postoperative patients. The T1/2 averaged 16.2 h, which corresponds to 3.8% of the amount infused per h. Two groups showed plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein of approximately 60 mg/L and still had a similarly long T1/2 for albumin. By contrast, patients undergoing surgery associated with major hemorrhage had a shorter T1/2, corresponding to 15% of the infused albumin per h. In addition, our analyses show that the T1/2 differ greatly depending on whether the calculations consider plasma volume changes and blood losses.
Conclusion: The disappearance rate of the albumin in 20% preparations was low in volunteers, in patients with moderately severe inflammation, and in postoperative patients.
{"title":"Plasma disappearance rate of albumin when infused as a 20% solution.","authors":"Markus Zdolsek, Patrick Y Wuethrich, Michaela Gunnström, Joachim H Zdolsek, Emma Hasselgren, Christian M Beilstein, Dominique Engel, Robert G Hahn","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03979-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-022-03979-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transcapillary leakage of albumin is increased by inflammation and major surgery, but whether exogenous albumin also disappears faster is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intravenous infusion of 3 mL/kg of 20% albumin was given over 30 min to 70 subjects consisting of 15 healthy volunteers, 15 post-burn patients, 15 patients who underwent surgery with minor bleeding, 10 who underwent surgery with major bleeding (mean, 1.1 L) and 15 postoperative patients. Blood Hb and plasma albumin were measured on 15 occasions over 5 h. The rate of albumin disappearance from the plasma was quantitated with population kinetic methodology and reported as the half-life (T<sub>1/2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed for T<sub>1/2</sub> between volunteers, post-burn patients, patients who underwent surgery with minor bleeding and postoperative patients. The T<sub>1/2</sub> averaged 16.2 h, which corresponds to 3.8% of the amount infused per h. Two groups showed plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein of approximately 60 mg/L and still had a similarly long T<sub>1/2</sub> for albumin. By contrast, patients undergoing surgery associated with major hemorrhage had a shorter T<sub>1/2</sub>, corresponding to 15% of the infused albumin per h. In addition, our analyses show that the T<sub>1/2</sub> differ greatly depending on whether the calculations consider plasma volume changes and blood losses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The disappearance rate of the albumin in 20% preparations was low in volunteers, in patients with moderately severe inflammation, and in postoperative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003982/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45236585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-08DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03964-8
C. Bruen, Mukhtar A Al-Saadi, E. Michelson, M. Tanios, Raul Mendoza-Ayala, Joseph Miller, Jeffrey Zhang, K. Stauderman, S. Hebbar, P. Hou
{"title":"Auxora vs. placebo for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized-controlled clinical trial","authors":"C. Bruen, Mukhtar A Al-Saadi, E. Michelson, M. Tanios, Raul Mendoza-Ayala, Joseph Miller, Jeffrey Zhang, K. Stauderman, S. Hebbar, P. Hou","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03964-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03964-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49308479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-08DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03953-x
Diogo Lopes, B. Chumbinho, João Pedro Bandovas, P. Faria, Catarina Espírito Santo, Bernardo Ferreira, Luis Val-Flores, Rui Pereira, N. Germano, L. Bento
{"title":"Pancreatic stone protein as a biomarker of sepsis","authors":"Diogo Lopes, B. Chumbinho, João Pedro Bandovas, P. Faria, Catarina Espírito Santo, Bernardo Ferreira, Luis Val-Flores, Rui Pereira, N. Germano, L. Bento","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03953-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03953-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46992224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-08DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5
Mark E Haaksma, Jasper M Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C Goligher, Leo Heunks, Endry H T Lim, Lidwine B Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi, Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier, Lei Xu, Massimo Zambon, Pieter R Tuinman
Background: Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist. Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for research.
Methods: To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature review, the following domains were chosen: "Anatomy and physiology", "Transducer Settings", "Ventilator Impact", "Learning and expertise", "Daily practice" and "Future directions". Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was needed to reach consensus on a question.
Results: Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42 questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition, key areas for research were established.
Conclusion: This expert consensus statement presents the first set of consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby key areas for research are established. Trial registration The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework with registration digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG .
{"title":"EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting.","authors":"Mark E Haaksma, Jasper M Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C Goligher, Leo Heunks, Endry H T Lim, Lidwine B Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi, Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier, Lei Xu, Massimo Zambon, Pieter R Tuinman","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragm ultrasonography is rapidly evolving in both critical care and research. Nevertheless, methodologically robust guidelines on its methodology and acquiring expertise do not, or only partially, exist. Therefore, we set out to provide consensus-based statements towards a universal measurement protocol for diaphragm ultrasonography and establish key areas for research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To formulate a robust expert consensus statement, between November 2020 and May 2021, a two-round, anonymous and online survey-based Delphi study among experts in the field was performed. Based on the literature review, the following domains were chosen: \"Anatomy and physiology\", \"Transducer Settings\", \"Ventilator Impact\", \"Learning and expertise\", \"Daily practice\" and \"Future directions\". Agreement of ≥ 68% (≥ 10 panelists) was needed to reach consensus on a question.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 panelists invited, 14 agreed to participate in the survey. After two rounds, the survey included 117 questions of which 42 questions were designed to collect arguments and opinions and 75 questions aimed at reaching consensus. Of these, 46 (61%) consensus was reached. In both rounds, the response rate was 100%. Among others, there was agreement on measuring thickness between the pleura and peritoneum, using > 10% decrease in thickness as cut-off for atrophy and using 40 examinations as minimum training to use diaphragm ultrasonography in clinical practice. In addition, key areas for research were established.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This expert consensus statement presents the first set of consensus-based statements on diaphragm ultrasonography methodology. They serve to ensure high-quality and homogenous measurements in daily clinical practice and in research. In addition, important gaps in current knowledge and thereby key areas for research are established. Trial registration The study was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework with registration digital object identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HM8UG .</p>","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991486/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49467922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-07DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03959-5
E. Trejnowska, Dominik Drobiński, P. Knapik, M. Wajda-Pokrontka, K. Szułdrzyński, Jakub Staromłyński, Wojciech Nowak, M. Urlik, M. Ochman, W. Goździk, W. Serednicki, J. Śmiechowicz, Jakub Brączkowski, W. Bąkowski, Anna Kwinta, M. Zembala, P. Suwalski
{"title":"Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome in Poland: a multicenter cohort study","authors":"E. Trejnowska, Dominik Drobiński, P. Knapik, M. Wajda-Pokrontka, K. Szułdrzyński, Jakub Staromłyński, Wojciech Nowak, M. Urlik, M. Ochman, W. Goździk, W. Serednicki, J. Śmiechowicz, Jakub Brączkowski, W. Bąkowski, Anna Kwinta, M. Zembala, P. Suwalski","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03959-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03959-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43687251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-04DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03958-6
F. Thiolliére, C. Falandry, B. Allaouchiche, Victor Geoffray, L. Bitker, J. Reignier, Paul Abraham, S. Malaquin, Baptiste Balança, Hélène Boyer, P. Seguin, C. Guichon, M. Simon, A. Friggeri, C. Vacheron, Laurent Bernard Thomas Albrice Stanislas Remi Carole Bened Argaud Floccard Rimmele Levrat Ledechowski Bruyere, L. Argaud, B. Floccard, T. Rimmele, A. Levrat, Stanislas Ledechowski, R. Bruyère, C. Schwebel, Benedicte Zerr, Luc Jarrige, Q. Blanc, J. Morel, O. Baldési, G. Plantefeve, P. Seguin, C. Dahyot-fizelier, Michel Bonnivard, J. Roustan, S. Vimeux, A. Mofredj, S. Alaya, A. Maamar, J. Badie, B. Souweine, G. Choukroun, Oriane Fontaine, J. Constantin, Marc Gainier, B. Misset, J. Orban, J. Reignier, J. Doise, O. Millet, L. Favier, B. Jany, Ramin Ravan, D. Roux, P. Bertrand, N. Bèle, S. Malaquin, P. Guinot, J. Quenot, F. Bounes, C. Koubi, P. Danin
{"title":"Intensive care-related loss of quality of life and autonomy at 6 months post-discharge: Does COVID-19 really make things worse?","authors":"F. Thiolliére, C. Falandry, B. Allaouchiche, Victor Geoffray, L. Bitker, J. Reignier, Paul Abraham, S. Malaquin, Baptiste Balança, Hélène Boyer, P. Seguin, C. Guichon, M. Simon, A. Friggeri, C. Vacheron, Laurent Bernard Thomas Albrice Stanislas Remi Carole Bened Argaud Floccard Rimmele Levrat Ledechowski Bruyere, L. Argaud, B. Floccard, T. Rimmele, A. Levrat, Stanislas Ledechowski, R. Bruyère, C. Schwebel, Benedicte Zerr, Luc Jarrige, Q. Blanc, J. Morel, O. Baldési, G. Plantefeve, P. Seguin, C. Dahyot-fizelier, Michel Bonnivard, J. Roustan, S. Vimeux, A. Mofredj, S. Alaya, A. Maamar, J. Badie, B. Souweine, G. Choukroun, Oriane Fontaine, J. Constantin, Marc Gainier, B. Misset, J. Orban, J. Reignier, J. Doise, O. Millet, L. Favier, B. Jany, Ramin Ravan, D. Roux, P. Bertrand, N. Bèle, S. Malaquin, P. Guinot, J. Quenot, F. Bounes, C. Koubi, P. Danin","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03958-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03958-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46224722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-04DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03947-9
Sheng-Huei Wang, Kuang-Yao Yang, C. Sheu, Wei-Cheng Chen, M. Chan, Jia-Yih Feng, Chia-Min Chen, Biing-Ru Wu, Zhe-Rong Zheng, Yu-Ching Chou, C. Peng
{"title":"The necessity of a loading dose when prescribing intravenous colistin in critically ill patients with CRGNB-associated pneumonia: a multi-center observational study","authors":"Sheng-Huei Wang, Kuang-Yao Yang, C. Sheu, Wei-Cheng Chen, M. Chan, Jia-Yih Feng, Chia-Min Chen, Biing-Ru Wu, Zhe-Rong Zheng, Yu-Ching Chou, C. Peng","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03947-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03947-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45202712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-02DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03966-6
L. Camous, Jean-David Pommier, F. Martino, B. Tressières, A. Demoule, M. Valette
{"title":"Very late intubation in COVID-19 patients: a forgotten prognosis factor?","authors":"L. Camous, Jean-David Pommier, F. Martino, B. Tressières, A. Demoule, M. Valette","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03966-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03966-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47989670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-31DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03957-7
Marco Daverio, Florian von Borell, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Francesca Sperotto, Paula Pokorna, Sebastian Brenner, Maria Cristina Mondardini, Dick Tibboel, Angela Amigoni, Erwin Ista
Background: Management and monitoring of pain and sedation to reduce discomfort as well as side effects, such as over- and under-sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium, is an integral part of pediatric intensive care practice. However, the current state of management and monitoring of analgosedation across European pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) remains unknown. The aim of this survey was to describe current practices across European PICUs regarding the management and monitoring of pain and sedation.
Methods: An online survey was distributed among 357 European PICUs assessing demographic features, drug choices and dosing, as well as usage of instruments for monitoring pain and sedation. We also compared low- and high-volume PICUs practices. Responses were collected from January to April 2021.
Results: A total of 215 (60% response rate) PICUs from 27 European countries responded. Seventy-one percent of PICUs stated to use protocols for analgosedation management, more frequently in high-volume PICUs (77% vs 63%, p = 0.028). First-choice drug combination was an opioid with a benzodiazepine, namely fentanyl (51%) and midazolam (71%) being the preferred drugs. The starting doses differed between PICUs from 0.1 to 5 mcg/kg/h for fentanyl, and 0.01 to 0.5 mg/kg/h for midazolam. Daily assessment and documentation for pain (81%) and sedation (87%) was reported by most of the PICUs, using the preferred validated FLACC scale (54%) and the COMFORT Behavioural scale (48%), respectively. Both analgesia and sedation were mainly monitored by nurses (92% and 84%, respectively). Eighty-six percent of the responding PICUs stated to use neuromuscular blocking agents in some scenarios. Monitoring of paralysed patients was preferably done by observation of vital signs with electronic devices support.
Conclusions: This survey provides an overview of current analgosedation practices among European PICUs. Drugs of choice, dosing and assessment strategies were shown to differ widely. Further research and development of evidence-based guidelines for optimal drug dosing and analgosedation assessment are needed.
{"title":"Pain and sedation management and monitoring in pediatric intensive care units across Europe: an ESPNIC survey.","authors":"Marco Daverio, Florian von Borell, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Francesca Sperotto, Paula Pokorna, Sebastian Brenner, Maria Cristina Mondardini, Dick Tibboel, Angela Amigoni, Erwin Ista","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03957-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13054-022-03957-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management and monitoring of pain and sedation to reduce discomfort as well as side effects, such as over- and under-sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium, is an integral part of pediatric intensive care practice. However, the current state of management and monitoring of analgosedation across European pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) remains unknown. The aim of this survey was to describe current practices across European PICUs regarding the management and monitoring of pain and sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed among 357 European PICUs assessing demographic features, drug choices and dosing, as well as usage of instruments for monitoring pain and sedation. We also compared low- and high-volume PICUs practices. Responses were collected from January to April 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 215 (60% response rate) PICUs from 27 European countries responded. Seventy-one percent of PICUs stated to use protocols for analgosedation management, more frequently in high-volume PICUs (77% vs 63%, p = 0.028). First-choice drug combination was an opioid with a benzodiazepine, namely fentanyl (51%) and midazolam (71%) being the preferred drugs. The starting doses differed between PICUs from 0.1 to 5 mcg/kg/h for fentanyl, and 0.01 to 0.5 mg/kg/h for midazolam. Daily assessment and documentation for pain (81%) and sedation (87%) was reported by most of the PICUs, using the preferred validated FLACC scale (54%) and the COMFORT Behavioural scale (48%), respectively. Both analgesia and sedation were mainly monitored by nurses (92% and 84%, respectively). Eighty-six percent of the responding PICUs stated to use neuromuscular blocking agents in some scenarios. Monitoring of paralysed patients was preferably done by observation of vital signs with electronic devices support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey provides an overview of current analgosedation practices among European PICUs. Drugs of choice, dosing and assessment strategies were shown to differ widely. Further research and development of evidence-based guidelines for optimal drug dosing and analgosedation assessment are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8969245/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41469292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03965-7
S. Muzaffar, S. Saran, S. Siddiqui
{"title":"Vitamin C therapy in septic shock","authors":"S. Muzaffar, S. Saran, S. Siddiqui","doi":"10.1186/s13054-022-03965-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03965-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":92888,"journal":{"name":"Critical care (Houten, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42918662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}