In this study, a circular type honeycomb sandwich panel using natural JUCO and synthetic woven glass fiber was fabricated, and the bending properties like bending strength, modulus of rupture (MOR), and modulus of elasticity (MOE) were evaluated. Polyurethane (PU) foam was injected into the core structure to improve the bending strength. The orientation of jute and cotton fiber was varied to investigate the best stiffness and strength. In addition, twill-type JUCO fiber mat and synthetic woven glass fiber were also used to fabricate the circular type honeycomb sandwich panel. Finite element modeling was undertaken to validate the experimental results. Prior to the finite element analysis, a tensile test was carried out to determine the boundary conditions. Injecting polyurethane foam into the honeycomb core does not show any significant impact on bending properties. However, the deformation rate increased considerably by adding PU foam in the core structure. According to the results, honeycomb sandwich panels made of woven glass fiber with PU foam exhibited more homogenous deflection and bending compliance compared with others.
The moment distribution method is considered one of the easiest and most reliable analysis methods. However, little attention has been given to modelling the stiffness of each member separately, as currently only one factor is being used to model all structural members without taking into account the loading conditions and curvature of the member. This can significantly influence the results when modelling columns, since unlike beams, which are usually bent in a single curvature configuration, columns can be bent in either a single or double curvature configuration. This paper presents a new set of stiffness factors to model each structural member separately depending on its boundary conditions and curvature. To validate this modification, an example concrete frame was modelled and analysed using the structural analysis software ETABS, and then the results were compared with that obtained from the standard moment distribution method and the modified moment distribution method. The results have revealed a significant enhancement in the accuracy of the obtained results when using the modified moment distribution method compared with the original moment distribution method, especially the values of the columns’ bending moments.