Pub Date : 2024-06-19DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0496-OA
Liqin Ling, Chaonan Liu, Xunbei Huang, Siqi Liu, Juan Liao, Jin Jia, Yang Fu, Jing Zhou
Context.—: Fondaparinux monitoring is not required among noncritically ill patients due to a predictable dose-response effect. However, this is debatable among critically ill patients, because fondaparinux bioavailability can be influenced by complicated medical conditions.
Objective.—: To investigate fondaparinux monitoring among the critically ill.
Design.—: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted in intensive care unit from February 2021 to December 2021, who received prophylactic fondaparinux and had anti-Xa activity tests.
Results.—: Of 156 anti-Xa values, 86 (55.1%) were within 0.10-0.50 μg/mL (the recommended prophylactic range), 38 (24.4%) were less than 0.10 μg/mL, 32 (20.5%) were greater than 0.50 μg/mL, demonstrating an unpredictable dose-response effect. Among 70 patients, thrombotic tendency was controlled in 32 (45.7%), thrombosis progressed in 22 (31.4%), bleeding events occurred in 16 (22.9%). Patients with progressed thrombosis had 17 of 54 (31.5%) anti-Xa less than 0.10 μg/mL, even though this proportion was greater than that of patients with controlled thrombotic tendency (11 of 72, 15.3%), it was similar to that of patients with bleeding (10 of 30, 33.3%), indicating a weak practicability of anti-Xa for monitoring fondaparinux efficacy. Thrombin-antithrombin complex showed a gradual decline among patients with controlled thrombotic tendency, but a bounce-back effect among patients with progressed thrombosis. Thrombelastography R value above the upper reference value occurred more frequently among patients with bleeding (4 of 6, 66.7%) compared to patients without bleeding (4 of 22, 18.2%) (P = .01).
Conclusions.—: The fondaparinux dose-response effect was unpredictable among the critically ill; anti-Xa activity combined with thrombin-antithrombin complex and thrombelastography can be helpful to guide a precise fondaparinux therapy in this population.
{"title":"Anti-Xa Activity Test Is Needed but Is Not Enough for Monitoring Fondaparinux Therapy Among Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Liqin Ling, Chaonan Liu, Xunbei Huang, Siqi Liu, Juan Liao, Jin Jia, Yang Fu, Jing Zhou","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0496-OA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0496-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Fondaparinux monitoring is not required among noncritically ill patients due to a predictable dose-response effect. However, this is debatable among critically ill patients, because fondaparinux bioavailability can be influenced by complicated medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To investigate fondaparinux monitoring among the critically ill.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients admitted in intensive care unit from February 2021 to December 2021, who received prophylactic fondaparinux and had anti-Xa activity tests.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Of 156 anti-Xa values, 86 (55.1%) were within 0.10-0.50 μg/mL (the recommended prophylactic range), 38 (24.4%) were less than 0.10 μg/mL, 32 (20.5%) were greater than 0.50 μg/mL, demonstrating an unpredictable dose-response effect. Among 70 patients, thrombotic tendency was controlled in 32 (45.7%), thrombosis progressed in 22 (31.4%), bleeding events occurred in 16 (22.9%). Patients with progressed thrombosis had 17 of 54 (31.5%) anti-Xa less than 0.10 μg/mL, even though this proportion was greater than that of patients with controlled thrombotic tendency (11 of 72, 15.3%), it was similar to that of patients with bleeding (10 of 30, 33.3%), indicating a weak practicability of anti-Xa for monitoring fondaparinux efficacy. Thrombin-antithrombin complex showed a gradual decline among patients with controlled thrombotic tendency, but a bounce-back effect among patients with progressed thrombosis. Thrombelastography R value above the upper reference value occurred more frequently among patients with bleeding (4 of 6, 66.7%) compared to patients without bleeding (4 of 22, 18.2%) (P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The fondaparinux dose-response effect was unpredictable among the critically ill; anti-Xa activity combined with thrombin-antithrombin complex and thrombelastography can be helpful to guide a precise fondaparinux therapy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141422154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0045-OA
David I Suster, A Craig Mackinnon, Saul Suster
Context.—: Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM1) is a recently developed immunohistochemical marker claimed to be highly specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancies. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that this marker can also be expressed in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus.
Objective.—: To examine INSM1 expression in lymphoepithelial thymic carcinomas.
Design.—: Thirty-four cases of lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus were examined by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD5, CD117, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small ribonucleic acid (EBER), and Ki-67. Basic clinical information was abstracted from the medical record.
Results.—: The patients were 14 women and 20 men, aged 20 to 85 years. The tumors arose in the anterior mediastinum without any previous history or evidence of malignancy at other sites. Immunohistochemical staining showed moderate to strong positivity of the tumor cells for INSM1 in 65% of cases (22 of 34), focal weak positivity in 20% (7 of 34), and negative staining in 5 cases. Chromogranin staining was focally and weakly positive in 1 case, and synaptophysin showed only focal weak positivity in scattered tumor cells in 12 cases. No significant correlation could be identified between the pattern and intensity of staining for INSM1 and staining for CD5, CD117, and Ki-67.
Conclusions.—: INSM1 positivity in lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus may represent a pitfall for diagnosis, particularly in small biopsy samples. Awareness of this finding may be of importance to avoid misdiagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancy.
{"title":"Insulinoma-Associated Protein-1 Expression in Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma of the Thymus: A Potential Pitfall for Diagnosis With Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Thymus.","authors":"David I Suster, A Craig Mackinnon, Saul Suster","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0045-OA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0045-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Insulinoma-associated protein-1 (INSM1) is a recently developed immunohistochemical marker claimed to be highly specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancies. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that this marker can also be expressed in non-neuroendocrine neoplasms including squamous cell carcinoma of the thymus.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To examine INSM1 expression in lymphoepithelial thymic carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Thirty-four cases of lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus were examined by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD5, CD117, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small ribonucleic acid (EBER), and Ki-67. Basic clinical information was abstracted from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The patients were 14 women and 20 men, aged 20 to 85 years. The tumors arose in the anterior mediastinum without any previous history or evidence of malignancy at other sites. Immunohistochemical staining showed moderate to strong positivity of the tumor cells for INSM1 in 65% of cases (22 of 34), focal weak positivity in 20% (7 of 34), and negative staining in 5 cases. Chromogranin staining was focally and weakly positive in 1 case, and synaptophysin showed only focal weak positivity in scattered tumor cells in 12 cases. No significant correlation could be identified between the pattern and intensity of staining for INSM1 and staining for CD5, CD117, and Ki-67.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>INSM1 positivity in lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the thymus may represent a pitfall for diagnosis, particularly in small biopsy samples. Awareness of this finding may be of importance to avoid misdiagnosis of neuroendocrine malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141332706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0020-OA
Dylan Wang, Hong Fang, Chi Young Ok, Jeffrey L Jorgensen, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Wei Wang, Sa A Wang
Context.—: Flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis plays an important role in the diagnosis, classification, and disease monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The interpretation of flow cytometry testing can be challenging.
Objective.—: To explore ways to improve diagnostic accuracy and in turn enhance the quality of patient care.
Design.—: A flow cytometry quality assurance (QA) program was developed. Cases from various complex flow cytometry panels were randomly selected and cross-reviewed. The outcomes of the QA review were categorized into 3 groups: complete agreement, minor discrepancy, and major discrepancy. Each discrepancy underwent a process of documentation, discussion, and resolution. Here we summarize our 3 years of experience with this program.
Results.—: In total, 6166 cases were evaluated; 6028 cases (97.7%) showed complete concordance, 120 cases (2.0%) showed minor discrepancies, and 18 cases (0.3%) showed major discrepancies. Among the top 5 panels evaluated, the panel evaluating mature T-cell abnormalities showed the highest rate of discrepancy, whereas the panel for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes showed the lowest discrepancy rate. When analyzing the trends of concordance and discrepancy over time, we observed a statistically significant decrease in discrepancy rate over time, from 4% at the beginning of the 6-month period to 1.5% in the final 6-month period.
Conclusions.—: The overall concordance rate was 97.7%. The remaining 2.3% of cases showed discrepancies that required a correction, underscoring the value and necessity of having a QA program. The overall discrepancy rates exhibited a gradual decline over time, indicative of the positive impact of the QA program on enhancing diagnostic competency and accuracy over time.
{"title":"Advancing Diagnostic Accuracy and Quality of Patient Care Through the Implementation of a Flow Cytometry Quality Assurance Program.","authors":"Dylan Wang, Hong Fang, Chi Young Ok, Jeffrey L Jorgensen, L Jeffrey Medeiros, Wei Wang, Sa A Wang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0020-OA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0020-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Flow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis plays an important role in the diagnosis, classification, and disease monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The interpretation of flow cytometry testing can be challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To explore ways to improve diagnostic accuracy and in turn enhance the quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A flow cytometry quality assurance (QA) program was developed. Cases from various complex flow cytometry panels were randomly selected and cross-reviewed. The outcomes of the QA review were categorized into 3 groups: complete agreement, minor discrepancy, and major discrepancy. Each discrepancy underwent a process of documentation, discussion, and resolution. Here we summarize our 3 years of experience with this program.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>In total, 6166 cases were evaluated; 6028 cases (97.7%) showed complete concordance, 120 cases (2.0%) showed minor discrepancies, and 18 cases (0.3%) showed major discrepancies. Among the top 5 panels evaluated, the panel evaluating mature T-cell abnormalities showed the highest rate of discrepancy, whereas the panel for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes showed the lowest discrepancy rate. When analyzing the trends of concordance and discrepancy over time, we observed a statistically significant decrease in discrepancy rate over time, from 4% at the beginning of the 6-month period to 1.5% in the final 6-month period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The overall concordance rate was 97.7%. The remaining 2.3% of cases showed discrepancies that required a correction, underscoring the value and necessity of having a QA program. The overall discrepancy rates exhibited a gradual decline over time, indicative of the positive impact of the QA program on enhancing diagnostic competency and accuracy over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0484-RA
H Cliff Sullivan, P Dayand Borge, Richard R Gammon, Manish Gandhi, Mary C Philogene, YanYun Wu, Patricia M Kopko
Context.—: The blood bank is often consulted for transfusion support of patients with suspected platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). The workup is complex because testing includes specialized assays that are uncommonly ordered with limited availability. Add to this the variety of possible products-crossmatched platelets, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched platelets, HLA antigen-negative platelets-and the approach to PTR can be overwhelming. Moreover, most literature on the subject is published in transfusion medicine journals aimed at transfusion medicine physicians and blood bank specialists in academic settings. Resources tailored to community hospital blood banks are lacking.
Objective.—: To provide pathologists who may not have subspecialized training in transfusion medicine and who direct blood banks algorithmic workflows based on clinical scenario and test availability to provide appropriate transfusion support for patients with PTR.
Data sources.—: This review is a comprehensive overview of terminology, HLA testing procedures, interpretations, and practical recommendations for managing PTR in various scenarios based on expert opinion as well as relevant medical literature published from 2007 to 2022.
Conclusions.—: Consultation on PTR is complicated and encompasses many clinical and laboratory aspects. The lack of guidelines derived from high-quality prospective studies poses challenges in the workup and management of PTR. Hindering the process further are limited test availability, unfamiliarity with the technical assays, and the various specialized platelet products. The clinical evaluation algorithm presented herein along with the workflow pathways offer pathologists user-friendly and best-practice guidelines with different options based on the clinical scenario and the tests available.
{"title":"Advances in Human Leukocyte Antigen Testing Technologies and Management Strategies for Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness.","authors":"H Cliff Sullivan, P Dayand Borge, Richard R Gammon, Manish Gandhi, Mary C Philogene, YanYun Wu, Patricia M Kopko","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0484-RA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0484-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The blood bank is often consulted for transfusion support of patients with suspected platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). The workup is complex because testing includes specialized assays that are uncommonly ordered with limited availability. Add to this the variety of possible products-crossmatched platelets, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched platelets, HLA antigen-negative platelets-and the approach to PTR can be overwhelming. Moreover, most literature on the subject is published in transfusion medicine journals aimed at transfusion medicine physicians and blood bank specialists in academic settings. Resources tailored to community hospital blood banks are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To provide pathologists who may not have subspecialized training in transfusion medicine and who direct blood banks algorithmic workflows based on clinical scenario and test availability to provide appropriate transfusion support for patients with PTR.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>This review is a comprehensive overview of terminology, HLA testing procedures, interpretations, and practical recommendations for managing PTR in various scenarios based on expert opinion as well as relevant medical literature published from 2007 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Consultation on PTR is complicated and encompasses many clinical and laboratory aspects. The lack of guidelines derived from high-quality prospective studies poses challenges in the workup and management of PTR. Hindering the process further are limited test availability, unfamiliarity with the technical assays, and the various specialized platelet products. The clinical evaluation algorithm presented herein along with the workflow pathways offer pathologists user-friendly and best-practice guidelines with different options based on the clinical scenario and the tests available.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0250-RA
Qiangqiang Gu, Ankush Patel, Matthew G Hanna, Jochen K Lennerz, Chris Garcia, Mark Zarella, David McClintock, Steven N Hart
Context.—: Computational pathology combines clinical pathology with computational analysis, aiming to enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve clinical productivity. However, communication barriers between pathologists and developers often hinder the full realization of this potential.
Objective.—: To propose a standardized framework that improves mutual understanding of clinical objectives and computational methodologies. The goal is to enhance the development and application of computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tools.
Design.—: The article suggests pivotal roles for pathologists and computer scientists in the CAD development process. It calls for increased understanding of computational terminologies, processes, and limitations among pathologists. Similarly, it argues that computer scientists should better comprehend the true use cases of the developed algorithms to avoid clinically meaningless metrics.
Results.—: CAD tools improve pathology practice significantly. Some tools have even received US Food and Drug Administration approval. However, improved understanding of machine learning models among pathologists is essential to prevent misuse and misinterpretation. There is also a need for a more accurate representation of the algorithms' performance compared to that of pathologists.
Conclusions.—: A comprehensive understanding of computational and clinical paradigms is crucial for overcoming the translational gap in computational pathology. This mutual comprehension will improve patient care through more accurate and efficient disease diagnosis.
{"title":"Bridging the Clinical-Computational Transparency Gap in Digital Pathology.","authors":"Qiangqiang Gu, Ankush Patel, Matthew G Hanna, Jochen K Lennerz, Chris Garcia, Mark Zarella, David McClintock, Steven N Hart","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0250-RA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0250-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Computational pathology combines clinical pathology with computational analysis, aiming to enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve clinical productivity. However, communication barriers between pathologists and developers often hinder the full realization of this potential.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To propose a standardized framework that improves mutual understanding of clinical objectives and computational methodologies. The goal is to enhance the development and application of computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tools.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The article suggests pivotal roles for pathologists and computer scientists in the CAD development process. It calls for increased understanding of computational terminologies, processes, and limitations among pathologists. Similarly, it argues that computer scientists should better comprehend the true use cases of the developed algorithms to avoid clinically meaningless metrics.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>CAD tools improve pathology practice significantly. Some tools have even received US Food and Drug Administration approval. However, improved understanding of machine learning models among pathologists is essential to prevent misuse and misinterpretation. There is also a need for a more accurate representation of the algorithms' performance compared to that of pathologists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>A comprehensive understanding of computational and clinical paradigms is crucial for overcoming the translational gap in computational pathology. This mutual comprehension will improve patient care through more accurate and efficient disease diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0560-RA
Maria Kleinaki, Johannes A Vey, Sinclair Awounvo, Angela Ishak, Maria Arnaouti, Han Suk Ryu, Ilias P Nikas
Context.—: Distinguishing metastatic carcinomas from mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions is a common diagnostic problem cytopathologists encounter.
Objective.—: To perform the first meta-analysis on the pooled diagnostic accuracy of claudin-4 immunochemistry in serous effusion cytopathology.
Design.—: This report followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy studies. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) were searched until October 9, 2023, followed by study selection using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction. The study quality assessment was performed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed by using R to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of claudin-4 immunochemistry. In addition, the diagnostic odds ratio was measured, representing the odds ratio of a positive result indicating a carcinoma rather than a mesothelial process in serous effusion cytology.
Results.—: Fourteen observational studies, published between 2011 and 2023, fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. All 14 studies used the 3E2C1 clone. Claudin-4 immunochemistry showed a high diagnostic accuracy in serous effusion cytology. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.02% (95% CI, 93.96%-99.37%) and 99.72% (95% CI, 97.36%-99.97%), respectively. Lastly, the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 1660.5 (95% CI, 760.0-3627.8) and no evidence of statistical heterogeneity between the included studies was found (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0).
Conclusions.—: Claudin-4 may be used as a single pan-carcinoma immunochemical biomarker in the differential diagnosis between metastatic carcinomas and mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion cytology.
{"title":"The Diagnostic Accuracy of Claudin-4 Immunochemistry in Differentiating Metastatic Carcinomas From Mesothelial Processes in Serous Effusion Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria Kleinaki, Johannes A Vey, Sinclair Awounvo, Angela Ishak, Maria Arnaouti, Han Suk Ryu, Ilias P Nikas","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0560-RA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0560-RA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Distinguishing metastatic carcinomas from mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions is a common diagnostic problem cytopathologists encounter.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To perform the first meta-analysis on the pooled diagnostic accuracy of claudin-4 immunochemistry in serous effusion cytopathology.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>This report followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy studies. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) were searched until October 9, 2023, followed by study selection using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction. The study quality assessment was performed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed by using R to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of claudin-4 immunochemistry. In addition, the diagnostic odds ratio was measured, representing the odds ratio of a positive result indicating a carcinoma rather than a mesothelial process in serous effusion cytology.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Fourteen observational studies, published between 2011 and 2023, fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. All 14 studies used the 3E2C1 clone. Claudin-4 immunochemistry showed a high diagnostic accuracy in serous effusion cytology. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.02% (95% CI, 93.96%-99.37%) and 99.72% (95% CI, 97.36%-99.97%), respectively. Lastly, the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 1660.5 (95% CI, 760.0-3627.8) and no evidence of statistical heterogeneity between the included studies was found (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Claudin-4 may be used as a single pan-carcinoma immunochemical biomarker in the differential diagnosis between metastatic carcinomas and mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion cytology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0037-CP
Larissa V Furtado, Kenji Ikemura, Cagla Y Benkli, Joel T Moncur, Richard S P Huang, Ahmet Zehir, Katherine Stellato, Patricia Vasalos, Navid Sadri, Carlos J Suarez
Context.—: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) accreditation requirements for clinical laboratory testing help ensure laboratories implement and maintain systems and processes that are associated with quality. Machine learning (ML)-based models share some features of conventional laboratory testing methods. Accreditation requirements that specifically address clinical laboratories' use of ML remain in the early stages of development.
Objective.—: To identify relevant CAP accreditation requirements that may be applied to the clinical adoption of ML-based molecular oncology assays, and to provide examples of current and emerging ML applications in molecular oncology testing.
Design.—: CAP accreditation checklists related to molecular pathology and general laboratory practices (Molecular Pathology, All Common and Laboratory General) were reviewed. Examples of checklist requirements that are generally applicable to validation, revalidation, quality management, infrastructure, and analytical procedures of ML-based molecular oncology assays were summarized. Instances of ML use in molecular oncology testing were assessed from literature review.
Results.—: Components of the general CAP accreditation framework that exist for traditional molecular oncology assay validation and maintenance are also relevant for implementing ML-based tests in a clinical laboratory. Current and emerging applications of ML in molecular oncology testing include DNA methylation profiling for central nervous system tumor classification, variant calling, microsatellite instability testing, mutational signature analysis, and variant prediction from histopathology images.
Conclusions.—: Currently, much of the ML activity in molecular oncology is within early clinical implementation. Despite specific considerations that apply to the adoption of ML-based methods, existing CAP requirements can serve as general guidelines for the clinical implementation of ML-based assays in molecular oncology testing.
背景美国病理学家学会(CAP)对临床实验室检测的认证要求有助于确保实验室实施并维护与质量相关的系统和流程。基于机器学习(ML)的模型与传统的实验室检测方法有一些共同之处。专门针对临床实验室使用 ML 的认可要求仍处于早期发展阶段:确定可能适用于临床采用基于 ML 的分子肿瘤学检测方法的相关 CAP 认证要求,并提供分子肿瘤学检测中当前和新兴 ML 应用的实例:对与分子病理学和普通实验室实践(分子病理学、所有普通实验室和普通实验室)相关的 CAP 认证检查表进行了审查。总结了一般适用于基于分子生物学检测的分子肿瘤学检测的验证、再验证、质量管理、基础设施和分析程序的核对表要求实例。根据文献回顾评估了分子肿瘤学检测中使用 ML 的实例:结果--:CAP 一般认证框架中用于传统分子肿瘤学检测验证和维护的部分也适用于在临床实验室实施基于 ML 的检测。ML 在分子肿瘤学检测中的现有和新兴应用包括用于中枢神经系统肿瘤分类的 DNA 甲基化分析、变异调用、微卫星不稳定性检测、突变特征分析和组织病理学图像变异预测:目前,分子肿瘤学领域的大部分 ML 活动都处于早期临床实施阶段。尽管在采用基于 ML 的方法时有一些具体的考虑因素,但现有的 CAP 要求可以作为在分子肿瘤学检测中临床实施基于 ML 的检测方法的一般指导原则。
{"title":"General Applicability of Existing College of American Pathologists Accreditation Requirements to Clinical Implementation of Machine Learning-Based Methods in Molecular Oncology Testing.","authors":"Larissa V Furtado, Kenji Ikemura, Cagla Y Benkli, Joel T Moncur, Richard S P Huang, Ahmet Zehir, Katherine Stellato, Patricia Vasalos, Navid Sadri, Carlos J Suarez","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0037-CP","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0037-CP","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) accreditation requirements for clinical laboratory testing help ensure laboratories implement and maintain systems and processes that are associated with quality. Machine learning (ML)-based models share some features of conventional laboratory testing methods. Accreditation requirements that specifically address clinical laboratories' use of ML remain in the early stages of development.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To identify relevant CAP accreditation requirements that may be applied to the clinical adoption of ML-based molecular oncology assays, and to provide examples of current and emerging ML applications in molecular oncology testing.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>CAP accreditation checklists related to molecular pathology and general laboratory practices (Molecular Pathology, All Common and Laboratory General) were reviewed. Examples of checklist requirements that are generally applicable to validation, revalidation, quality management, infrastructure, and analytical procedures of ML-based molecular oncology assays were summarized. Instances of ML use in molecular oncology testing were assessed from literature review.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Components of the general CAP accreditation framework that exist for traditional molecular oncology assay validation and maintenance are also relevant for implementing ML-based tests in a clinical laboratory. Current and emerging applications of ML in molecular oncology testing include DNA methylation profiling for central nervous system tumor classification, variant calling, microsatellite instability testing, mutational signature analysis, and variant prediction from histopathology images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Currently, much of the ML activity in molecular oncology is within early clinical implementation. Despite specific considerations that apply to the adoption of ML-based methods, existing CAP requirements can serve as general guidelines for the clinical implementation of ML-based assays in molecular oncology testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-06DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0486-OA
Dave Smart, Jeff Schreier, Ila R Singh
Context.—: Laboratory testing, beyond what is essential for managing health, is considered low-value care, posing patient risks and wasting resources. Measuring excess testing on a national level is crucial to identify waste and optimize healthcare resource allocation for maximum impact.
Objective.—: To measure inappropriate laboratory testing and its cost across Medicare and many US commercial payers.
Design.—: A retrospective analysis on 2019 claims data measured the frequency of 4 commonly used laboratory tests among 64 million individuals with Medicare and 168 million with commercial insurance. Tests included 25-hydroxy vitamin D, prostate-specific antigen, lipid panel, and hemoglobin A1c. Clinical guidelines, medical literature, and payer recommendations were used to determine appropriate testing frequencies. Costs of excessive testing were calculated using the 2019 clinical lab fee schedule. A targeted analysis of 2022 data confirmed 2019 trends.
Results.—: Analysis of ∼84 million tests from ∼1 billion outpatient test claim records revealed that 7% to 51% of tests exceeded recommended frequencies, with some egregious overuse: for example hemoglobin-A1c or prostate-specific antigen every week. The conservative cost estimate for 4 excess tests surpassed $350 million.
Conclusions.—: This extensive study, involving 232 million people, found that 14.4 million of 60.5 million individuals (23.8%) tested had undergone excessive laboratory testing, with likely little benefit and possible harm. Extrapolating findings to all laboratory testing suggests that Medicare alone may have incurred direct excess expenses from $1.95 to $3.28 billion in 2019, without factoring the hidden costs of excessive testing (eg, downstream care). Addressing unnecessary testing is crucial to lowering costs and redirecting resources for greater patient benefit.
{"title":"Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: Significant Waste Quantified by a Large-Scale Year-Long Study of Medicare and Commercial Payer Reimbursement.","authors":"Dave Smart, Jeff Schreier, Ila R Singh","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0486-OA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0486-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Laboratory testing, beyond what is essential for managing health, is considered low-value care, posing patient risks and wasting resources. Measuring excess testing on a national level is crucial to identify waste and optimize healthcare resource allocation for maximum impact.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To measure inappropriate laboratory testing and its cost across Medicare and many US commercial payers.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective analysis on 2019 claims data measured the frequency of 4 commonly used laboratory tests among 64 million individuals with Medicare and 168 million with commercial insurance. Tests included 25-hydroxy vitamin D, prostate-specific antigen, lipid panel, and hemoglobin A1c. Clinical guidelines, medical literature, and payer recommendations were used to determine appropriate testing frequencies. Costs of excessive testing were calculated using the 2019 clinical lab fee schedule. A targeted analysis of 2022 data confirmed 2019 trends.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Analysis of ∼84 million tests from ∼1 billion outpatient test claim records revealed that 7% to 51% of tests exceeded recommended frequencies, with some egregious overuse: for example hemoglobin-A1c or prostate-specific antigen every week. The conservative cost estimate for 4 excess tests surpassed $350 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This extensive study, involving 232 million people, found that 14.4 million of 60.5 million individuals (23.8%) tested had undergone excessive laboratory testing, with likely little benefit and possible harm. Extrapolating findings to all laboratory testing suggests that Medicare alone may have incurred direct excess expenses from $1.95 to $3.28 billion in 2019, without factoring the hidden costs of excessive testing (eg, downstream care). Addressing unnecessary testing is crucial to lowering costs and redirecting resources for greater patient benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141262279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP
Brittney Boles, Juli-Anne Gardner, Catherine W Rehder, Brynn Levy, Gopalrao V Velagaleti, Reha M Toydemir, William R Sukov, Daniel P Larson, Yang Cao, Christopher Mixon, Rachel K Vanderscheldon, Ying S Zou, Caroline Astbury, Karen D Tsuchiya, Jess F Peterson
Context.—: The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.
Objective.—: To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.
Design.—: A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.
Results.—: A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.
Conclusions.—: This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.
{"title":"Conventional Cytogenetic Analysis of Constitutional Abnormalities: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Test Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee.","authors":"Brittney Boles, Juli-Anne Gardner, Catherine W Rehder, Brynn Levy, Gopalrao V Velagaleti, Reha M Toydemir, William R Sukov, Daniel P Larson, Yang Cao, Christopher Mixon, Rachel K Vanderscheldon, Ying S Zou, Caroline Astbury, Karen D Tsuchiya, Jess F Peterson","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0048-CP","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The joint College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Cytogenetics Committee works to ensure competency and proficiency of clinical cytogenetics testing laboratories through proficiency testing programs for various clinical tests offered by such laboratories, including the evaluation of constitutional abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To review and analyze 20 years of constitutional chromosome analysis proficiency testing results (2003-2022), primarily utilizing G-banded karyograms.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A retrospective review of results from 2003 through 2022 was performed, identifying challenges addressing constitutional disorders. The chromosomal abnormalities and overall performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>A total of 184 cases from 161 proficiency testing challenges were administered from 2003 through 2022. Challenges consisted of metaphase images and accompanying clinical history for evaluation of numerical and/or structural abnormalities. Of the 184 cases, only 2 (1%) failed to reach an 80% grading consensus for recognition of the abnormality. Both cases illustrated the limitations of correctly characterizing some chromosomal abnormalities, including recombinant chromosomal abnormalities and isochromosome identification. In addition, 2 cases failed to reach a consensus for nomenclature reporting: 1 with an isochromosome and another with a duplication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>This 20-year review illustrates the high rate of competency and proficiency of cytogenetic laboratories in the correct identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141262327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Context.—: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia distinguished by its rapidly progressive and fatal clinical course. Measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is vital for the prognosis and clinical management of acute myeloid leukemia.
Objective.—: To examine the immunophenotypes of the residual leukemic cells, evaluate the performance of multiparametric flow cytometry (FCM) measuring MRD, and compare it with molecular monitoring in patients diagnosed with APL.
Design.—: Two hundred seventy-seven patients with APL were enrolled. Immunophenotypes were prospectively analyzed by a 1-tube-10-color antibody panel via FCM. MRD of APL with PML::RARα was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). The clinical value of MRD as an indicator of survival was also examined.
Results.—: APL showed 5 distinct patterns of residual leukemic cells, based on CD45 and side-scatter scattergram, all with CD9 positivity and a previously unrealized loss of CD117. FCM-based MRD evaluation showed a concordance rate of 87.7% with PCR. At the end of the consolidation therapy, MRD measured by both PCR and FCM could differentiate patients with longer and shorter overall survival (OS) (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). Patients with APL variant had a shorter OS than patients with APL who harbored PML::RARα (P < .001).
Conclusions.—: CD9 is a reliable marker to differentiate residual leukemic cells from normally differentiating myeloid cells. FCM demonstrated a high comparability to PCR-MRD and an excellent performance in predicting OS, and thus could potentially be used as a routine indicator in the clinical management of patients with APL.
{"title":"Measurable Residual Disease Analysis by Flow Cytometry and Correlation With Molecular Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Prospective Study.","authors":"Zhihao Wen, Xinran Xue, Shuhua Li, Yu Liu, Yongmei Jin, Nenggang Jiang, Hongyan Liao","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0460-OA","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0460-OA","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia distinguished by its rapidly progressive and fatal clinical course. Measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is vital for the prognosis and clinical management of acute myeloid leukemia.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To examine the immunophenotypes of the residual leukemic cells, evaluate the performance of multiparametric flow cytometry (FCM) measuring MRD, and compare it with molecular monitoring in patients diagnosed with APL.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Two hundred seventy-seven patients with APL were enrolled. Immunophenotypes were prospectively analyzed by a 1-tube-10-color antibody panel via FCM. MRD of APL with PML::RARα was detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). The clinical value of MRD as an indicator of survival was also examined.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>APL showed 5 distinct patterns of residual leukemic cells, based on CD45 and side-scatter scattergram, all with CD9 positivity and a previously unrealized loss of CD117. FCM-based MRD evaluation showed a concordance rate of 87.7% with PCR. At the end of the consolidation therapy, MRD measured by both PCR and FCM could differentiate patients with longer and shorter overall survival (OS) (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). Patients with APL variant had a shorter OS than patients with APL who harbored PML::RARα (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>CD9 is a reliable marker to differentiate residual leukemic cells from normally differentiating myeloid cells. FCM demonstrated a high comparability to PCR-MRD and an excellent performance in predicting OS, and thus could potentially be used as a routine indicator in the clinical management of patients with APL.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141262513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}