Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine最新文献

Context.—: Lymphangioleiomyomatosis is a rare multisystem disorder belonging to the family of neoplasms exhibiting perivascular epithelioid differentiation. It primarily affects women of childbearing age. The disease is characterized by a proliferation of smooth muscle-like cells (lymphangioleiomyomatosis cells) within all lung compartments, leading to cystic parenchymal destruction and, in some cases, respiratory failure. These cells carry mutations in one or both tuberous sclerosis (TSC) genes and coexpress smooth muscle and melanocytic markers. Female hormones, particularly estrogens, influence the course of the disease. Symptoms of lymphangioleiomyomatosis vary significantly among patients, ranging from exertional dyspnea and coughing to chest pain and recurrent pneumothorax.

Objective.—: To present the latest advancements in the understanding of disease pathogenesis and diagnosis, illustrate the pathologic and radiologic findings, provide a reference for pathologists and other health care professionals, briefly discuss recent evidence-based therapeutic approaches, and emphasize the importance of adopting a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and optimization of patient care.

Data sources.—: A comprehensive review of pertinent medical literature published in the last 30 years, focusing on publications written in the English language, was performed.

Conclusions.—: Despite the recent significant advancements in the understanding and management of lymphangioleiomyomatosis, there are still significant gaps in our knowledge of its pathophysiology and the role of the immune system in the genesis and progression of the disease. The current changes in diagnostic algorithms favor the adoption of minimally invasive procedures as the standard of care. As a result, the clinical laboratory will play a larger role in the diagnosis of lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and surgical pathologists will likely be less involved in the diagnosis of pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis than they currently are.

Context.—: The use of hormonal therapy and gender-affirming surgery in the transgender community has been rising during the last several years. Although it is generally safe, hormonal therapy's link to testicular cancer remains uncertain.

Objective.—: To review the incidence of testicular cancer in specimens from gender-affirming orchiectomies at our institution and evaluate the tumors for histologic and genetic alterations.

Design.—: Pathology reports for gender-affirming orchiectomies (January 1, 2018, to August 1, 2023) were reviewed for testicular neoplasms, with additional analysis for chromosome 12 abnormalities. Incidence and chromosome variations were compared with those in the general population.

Results.—: Among 458 cases during 5.5 years, 5 germ cell neoplasms in 4 patients emerged. Our institution's annual incidence rate (159 per 100 000) is 26.5 times higher than the National Cancer Institute's previous report (6.0 per 100 000). Although they were morphologically no different from germ cell neoplasms in the general population, fluorescence in situ hybridization tests showed no i(12p) in 4 of 5 neoplasms (80%) in our cohort.

Conclusions.—: The cause behind this rise in incidence remains uncertain but may be due to long term pretreatment with hormones or blockers. The lower isochromosome 12p frequency suggests an alternative mechanism driving tumor development, which requires more detailed molecular studies.

Context.—: For equitable global health care, the United Nations has outlined Sustainable Development Goals for health in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) with the goal of reaching universal health care by 2030. Currently, 47% of the global population lacks access to basic diagnostics for many common diseases. The need for diagnostic access has never been more critical owing to the dramatic rise of noncommunicable diseases in LMICS. In a recent analysis, The Lancet Commission on Diagnostics estimated that 1.1 million deaths occurring on an annual basis could be avoided if the diagnostic gap were reduced to 10% for only 6 priority conditions.

Objective.—: To provide a nonexhaustive summary of the progress made to overcome the barriers to adequate access and explore the potential solutions needed to achieve global diagnostic equity.

Data sources.—: Several experts in global pathology were interviewed in addition to pathologists working in low-resource settings outside of the United States. Published literature on the topic of global pathology work was analyzed and summarized to provide a cohesive snapshot of the status of global pathology.

Conclusions.—: Working to increase access to diagnostics in low-resource settings will save millions of lives. The solution to the current inadequate availability of global pathology services will require a global commitment from the entire pathology and laboratory medicine community, government support, and collaboration between the public-private sectors to achieve equitable health care.

Context.—: Quality communication between clinicians and pathologists is required for optimal cancer care. The College of American Pathologists provides anatomic site-specific cancer protocols that facilitate synoptic reporting for efficient communication, contributing to accuracy and completeness of cancer staging.

Objective.—: To evaluate synoptic cancer pathology reporting across the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated health system in the United States, for 4 common cancers: melanoma and colon, bladder, and kidney cancer.

Design.—: For each cancer type, we investigated at least 200 biopsy and 200 resection reports from 2019 to 2021. In each report, we determined whether a synoptic format was used. The reports were selected using random sampling across all VA health care facilities. We also identified a set of core elements that were underdocumented.

Results.—: Among 1618 pathology reports, 778 (48%; 95% CI, 46%-50%) were synoptic reports. Synoptic reporting was much more common among resections (621 of 811; 77%; 95% CI, 74%-79%) than among biopsies (157 of 807; 19%; 95% CI, 17%-22%). It was most common in colorectal resections (200 of 206; 97%; 95% CI, 94%-99%) and least common in colon biopsy reports (1 of 200; 0.5%; 95% CI, 0%-3%). Core elements that were underdocumented included procedure and regional lymph nodes for resections of bladder and kidney cancer and of melanoma.

Conclusions.—: Synoptic reporting was used about three-quarters of the time for resections and about 1 in 5 times for biopsies. Future work should develop implementation strategies to improve synoptic reporting, especially for biopsy specimens and core elements that were relatively underdocumented.

Context.—: Galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A1 (Gd-IgA1) deposition in the renal mesangium plays a role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy.

Objective.—: To assess the serum Gd-IgA1 level in biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy cases at diagnosis and 3 months post treatment and its relation with histologic Oxford classification.

Design.—: In this hospital-based prospective cohort study, 40 cases and 20 controls were enrolled. Serum samples of biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy cases collected on the day of biopsy and 3 months post treatment were evaluated. Solid-phase ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) was performed for assessment of Gd-IgA1 level. All renal biopsies were scored by using the Oxford classification (C-MEST score). The association of serum Gd-IgA1 levels with other established prognostic parameters was assessed. To estimate the prognostic value of markers, logistic regression analysis and Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA (analysis of variance) were used.

Results.—: A significant difference was observed in the serum Gd-IgA1 level values in the IgA nephropathy cases and healthy controls (P = .001) at baseline. However, no significant correlation between serum Gd-IgA1 levels at baseline and 3 months of follow-up (P = .31) or between baseline levels and age, proteinuria, hematuria, or estimated glomerular filtration rate was noted. There was no significant correlation between C-MEST score and serum Gd-IgA1 levels at baseline (P > .05); however, the distribution of Gd-IgA1 at 3 months was found to differ significantly between different grades of S score (P = .008).

Conclusions.—: Serum Gd-IgA1 levels may be of utility in predicting disease progression in IgA nephropathy cases. Measurement of serum Gd-IgA1 levels for the diagnosis and prognosis of IgA nephropathy may preclude the need for invasive renal biopsies.

Context.—: Folate receptor-α (FRα, encoded by the FOLR1 gene) is overexpressed in several solid tumor types, including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), making it an attractive biomarker and target for FRα-based therapy in ovarian cancer.

Objective.—: To describe the development, analytic verification, and clinical performance of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc) in EOC.

Design.—: We used industry standard studies to establish the analytic verification of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay. Furthermore, the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay was used in the ImmunoGen Inc-sponsored SORAYA study to select patients for treatment with mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) in platinum-resistant EOC.

Results.—: The VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is highly reproducible, demonstrated by a greater than 98% overall percent agreement (OPA) for repeatability and intermediate precision studies, greater than 93% OPA for interreader and greater than 96% for intrareader studies, and greater than 90% OPA across all observations in the interlaboratory reproducibility study. The performance of the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay in the SORAYA study was evaluated by the overall staining acceptability rate, which was calculated using the number of patient specimens that were tested with the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay that had an evaluable result. In the SORAYA trial, data in patients who received MIRV demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy, and the overall staining acceptability rate of the assay was 98.4%, demonstrating that the VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is safe and effective for selecting patients who may benefit from MIRV. Together, these data showed that the assay is highly reliable, consistently producing evaluable results in the clinical setting.

Conclusions.—: The VENTANA FOLR1 Assay is a robust and reproducible assay for detecting FRα expression and identifying a patient population that derived clinically meaningful benefit from MIRV in the SORAYA study.

Context.—: Breast cancers (BCs) with low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression (HER2-low) have become a targetable subset because of novel antibody-drug conjugates. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the recommended assay for HER2 classification but is associated with limited interobserver agreement concerning HER2-low identification.

Objective.—: To investigate whether mRNA expression quantified via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) could serve as a valuable complementary and more objective method to identify HER2-low BCs.

Design.—: We selected all cases from a previously published interobserver study, which included 105 needle biopsies from HER2 nonamplified BC cases. HER2 IHC was evaluated by 16 pathologists. For the current study, mRNA was extracted from microdissected invasive tumor cells. RT-qPCR was performed for quantitative evaluation of HER2, using the cutoff values of the MammaTyper assay. We compared the mRNA expression levels with the IHC scores of the majority agreement (IHC 0, IHC >0, <1+ [ultralow], 1+, 2+) and the following HER2 subcategories: HER2 0/ultralow and HER2-low (IHC 1+ and 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridization negative).

Results.—: In total, 88 nonamplified HER2 cases could be analyzed. Based on IHC, 17 cases were HER2 0/ultralow and 71 were HER2-low. The mean rank HER2 mRNA level was significantly higher in HER2-low cases than in the HER2 0/ultralow group (P < .001). However, 10 of 17 HER2 0/ultralow cases by IHC (58.8%) were classified as HER2-low by MammaTyper, 2 of 71 cases (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2 0/ultralow by MammaTyper, and 2 (2.8%) were HER2-low by IHC and HER2-positive by RP-qPCR.

Conclusions.—: Our findings indicate a strong agreement between mRNA expression quantified by RT-qPCR and HER2 IHC scores, although there was a substantial proportion of discordant HER2 results between both methods owing to overestimation of HER2 expression by MammaTyper compared to IHC. Future large-scale trials should determine which technique is best associated with clinical outcome.

Context.—: Seegene Medical Foundation, one of the major clinical laboratories in South Korea, developed SeeDP, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based postanalytic daily quality control (QC) system that reassesses all gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic biopsy (EB) slides for incorrect diagnoses.

Objective.—: To review the operational records and clinical impact of SeeDP since its launch in March 2022.

Design.—: Operational records of SeeDP were retrieved for the period of March 1, 2022, to February 28, 2023. Among cases scanned during 40 working days (March 10, 2022, to May 4, 2022), all discordant cases encountered by 2 pathologists were reviewed. Cases of SeeDP-assisted revised diagnoses were collected and compared with cases recognized using conventional methods.

Results.—: Occasional scanner failures and various types of aberrant errors compromised QC coverage, resulting in the scanning of only 67.7% (572 254 of 844 906) of all EB slides submitted and 0.8% of the scanned slides being further excluded from the AI analysis. The AI predictions differed from the pathologists' diagnoses in 42 760 of the 557 672 gastrointestinal EB slides (7.7%) successfully assessed by the AI models; however, a detailed review of discordant slides revealed that true misdiagnosis accounted for only 5.5% (25 of 454) of the disagreements. Compared with conventional error recognition methods, SeeDP detected more misdiagnoses (7 versus 14) within a significantly shorter time (average, 3.6 versus 38.7 days; P < .001), including 1 signet ring cell carcinoma initially diagnosed as gastritis.

Conclusions.—: AI-based daily QC systems are plausible solutions to guarantee high-quality pathologic diagnosis by enabling rapid detection and correction of misdiagnosis.

Context.—: Recent neoadjuvant clinical trials in lung cancer have demonstrated the survival benefits in carefully selected patients. Standardization of the assessment of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in surgically resected specimens is required.

Objective.—: To review the current pathology practices in the gross processing and microscopic assessment of surgically resected non-small cell lung carcinoma specimens after neoadjuvant therapy.

Data sources.—: PubMed publications and experience of the author.

Conclusions.—: Gross processing of the surgically resected lung carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy needs further refinement and standardization in clinical trials and in a real-world clinical practice. Microscopic assessment of the response includes quantification of viable tumor, necrosis, and stroma. The best approach would be to use a single standardized and most reproducible scoring system. Published studies on gross processing of lung carcinoma specimens in the neoadjuvant setting and microscopic assessment of pathologic response provide a good foundation for the future standardization of pathology practice.

Context.—: Biomedical research relies on available biomaterials and associated data, and the quality of this starting material can have a significant impact on the quality of the experimental results. In the 2000s, best-practice documents and guidelines for biorepositories were published, followed in the 2010s by standards documents used to support accreditation. The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program and the International Standards Organization's standard 20387 were launched in 2012 and 2018, respectively.

Objective.—: To identify quantitative and qualitative differences between the two aforementioned biorepository accreditation standards for use by the larger biomedical research community; the results will empower biorepositories to select an accreditation program that best fits their goals.

Design.—: Individual requirements of both accreditation standards were identified and a bidirectional crosswalk was performed to identify gaps. Requirements were assigned to one of several standardized categories to enable comparison of the relative emphasis of different categories between the standards.

Results.—: Quantitatively, the College of American Pathologists program is comprehensive and stands alone, with 523 requirements, whereas the International Standards Organization program contains 167 requirements and is comprehensive through its incorporation and reference to numerous related standards documents. Qualitatively, both programs rely heavily on the implementation of an overarching quality management system and both programs can accommodate different types of biobanks (eg, human and animal).

Conclusions.—: The standards differ in number of requirements, distribution of requirements across categories, and amount of reliance on separate standard documents. This information may aid in selection of an appropriate accreditation standard.