CJEM最新文献

Purpose: This study aimed to understand current prehospital trauma air-ambulance policies and triage guidelines across Canada. The research question centered on understanding the guidelines used by provinces and territories and identifying potential regional variations in air-ambulance triage.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from November 2022 to May 2023, involving trauma leaders from Canada's 13 provinces and territories. Participants were identified via the Trauma Association of Canada and professional networks. The survey, developed with expert input and pilot tested for clarity, focused on prehospital trauma-triage guidelines, level of adoption of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) triage guidelines, and auto-launch air-ambulance policies. Data were collected using an 18-item electronic survey. Potential response bias was considered, and confidentiality was maintained. A cross-sectional qualitative analysis was used to evaluate the guidelines' adoption and variations, with responses compared across regions.

Results: The analysis revealed a nationwide adoption (11 of 11 respondents) of the CDC guidelines, indicating a standardized approach to patient transportation. Notably, many provinces and territories (5 of 11) endorse auto-launch protocols for air ambulances in specific scenarios. These policies offer advantages in geographically vast regions weighed against the cost of over-triage and inefficient resource allocation. Each province and territory tailors its approach based on factors such as geographic areas served, and available resources.

Conclusion: This study provides a snapshot of the current state of prehospital trauma-triage guidelines in Canada. With some differences in nomenclature, Canadian provinces and territories widely apply the CDC guidelines to serve their populations. There is some regional variation on how transport is initiated within their borders. The findings underscore the delicate balance required for optimizing air-ambulance policies, considering factors such as timely access, resource allocation, and the local application of guidelines.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to better understand caregiver perspectives on educational materials relating to paediatric community-acquired pneumonia and antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department setting.

Methods: This was a phenomenologically informed qualitative study. Caregivers of young children in Hamilton, Ontario were presented with four educational materials (animated video, physician led lecture-style video, caregiver led testimony-style video, and a printed brochure) providing information relating to treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia. Caregivers were then asked open-ended questions about how they felt about the effectiveness of the media used. The principles of conventional content analysis guided the coding and synthesis of the transcribed interviews.

Results: Eleven caregivers were interviewed. Most caregivers preferred the animated video and brochure to the lecture-style physician video and caregiver testimonial video. Common themes for effective educational materials included visually attention-grabbing graphics, accessible language, and formats they could reference following their visit (e.g. brochure).

Conclusions: The busy nature of the emergency department setting can impede effective communication between clinicians and parents. Employing educational materials may allow for more informed parent-provider communication on care decision making. Caregivers in our study prioritized the simplest information formats for education around community-acquired pneumonia and antimicrobial stewardship which could be referenced following discharge. This was best accomplished by short, animated videos and brochures. Results from this study can inform development of future educational materials used in paediatric emergency department settings to optimize caregiver education and corresponding care plan adherence.

Introduction: Patients requiring emergent endotracheal intubation are at higher risk of post-intubation hypotension due to altered physiology in critical illness. Post-intubation hypotension increases mortality and hospital length of stay, however, the impact of vasopressors on its incidence and outcomes is not known. This scoping review identified studies reporting hemodynamic data in patients undergoing emergent intubation to provide a literature overview on post-intubation hypotension in cohorts that did and did not receive vasopressors.

Methods: A systematic search of CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and PubMed-Medline was performed from database inception until September 28, 2023. Two independent reviewers completed the title and abstract screen, full text review and data extraction per PRISMA guidelines. Studies including patients < 18 years or intubations during cardiac arrest were excluded. Primary outcome was the presence of hypotension within 30 min of emergent intubation. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 1 h and in-hospital.

Results: The systematic search yielded 13,126 articles, with 61 selected for final inclusion. There were 24,547 patients with a mean age of 57.2 years and a slight male predominance (63.8%). Respiratory failure was the most common intubation indication. Across 18 studies reporting on vasopressor use prior to intubation, 1171/7085 patients received vasopressors pre-intubation. Post-intubation hypotension occurred in 22.2% of patients across all studies, and in 34.3% of patients in studies where vasopressor administration pre-intubation was specifically reported. One-hour mortality of patients across all studies and within the vasopressor use studies was 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively. In-hospital mortality across studies was 21.5%, and 13.1% in studies which reported on vasopressor use pre-intubation.

Conclusion: Patients requiring emergent intubation have a high rate of post-intubation hypotension and in-hospital mortality. While there is an intuitive rationale for the use of vasopressors during emergent intubation, current evidence is limited to support a definitive change in clinical practice at this time.