A. Drucker, Lingyan Bai, L. Eder, A. Chan, E. Pope, K. Tu, L. Jaakkimainen
Background Some jurisdictions experience sociodemographic disparities in atopic dermatitis care, including emergency department visits, but data from Canada are limited. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Ontario and to identify sociodemographic factors associated with emergency department visits and hospitalizations for this condition. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients in the Electronic Medical Record Primary Care database linked with administrative health data for Ontario, Canada. We estimated period prevalence and health service utilization for atopic dermatitis from 2005 to 2015. We used multivariable log-binomial regression to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between local dermatologist density and the proportion of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for atopic dermatitis. Results Among 249 984 patients, we identified 7812 with atopic dermatitis (period prevalence 2005–2015: 3.1%). Almost all physician visits for atopic dermatitis were to primary care physicians (> 99%). For every additional dermatologist per 100 000 population, the proportions of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for atopic dermatitis increased by 29% (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.57). This relationship occurred in and around Toronto but was not consistent across the province. Interpretation In Ontario, higher dermatologist density was not associated with lower emergency department utilization and hospitalization for atopic dermatitis; the association varied in different locales with similar dermatologist densities. Strategies to improve access to care for atopic dermatitis should be tailored to local contexts.
{"title":"Sociodemographic characteristics and emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations for atopic dermatitis in Ontario: a cross-sectional study","authors":"A. Drucker, Lingyan Bai, L. Eder, A. Chan, E. Pope, K. Tu, L. Jaakkimainen","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210194","url":null,"abstract":"Background Some jurisdictions experience sociodemographic disparities in atopic dermatitis care, including emergency department visits, but data from Canada are limited. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Ontario and to identify sociodemographic factors associated with emergency department visits and hospitalizations for this condition. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of patients in the Electronic Medical Record Primary Care database linked with administrative health data for Ontario, Canada. We estimated period prevalence and health service utilization for atopic dermatitis from 2005 to 2015. We used multivariable log-binomial regression to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between local dermatologist density and the proportion of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for atopic dermatitis. Results Among 249 984 patients, we identified 7812 with atopic dermatitis (period prevalence 2005–2015: 3.1%). Almost all physician visits for atopic dermatitis were to primary care physicians (> 99%). For every additional dermatologist per 100 000 population, the proportions of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for atopic dermatitis increased by 29% (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05–1.57). This relationship occurred in and around Toronto but was not consistent across the province. Interpretation In Ontario, higher dermatologist density was not associated with lower emergency department utilization and hospitalization for atopic dermatitis; the association varied in different locales with similar dermatologist densities. Strategies to improve access to care for atopic dermatitis should be tailored to local contexts.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49529077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G. Hanley, Jin-zhu Niu, Jihee Han, S. Fung, H. Bryant, J. Kwon, D. Huntsman, Sarah J. Finlayson, J. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, C. Earle
Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. Methods: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. Results: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). Interpretation: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.
{"title":"Opportunistic salpingectomy between 2011 and 2016: a descriptive analysis","authors":"G. Hanley, Jin-zhu Niu, Jihee Han, S. Fung, H. Bryant, J. Kwon, D. Huntsman, Sarah J. Finlayson, J. McAlpine, Dianne Miller, C. Earle","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210219","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) is the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy for benign indications or instead of tubal ligation, for the purpose of preventing ovarian cancer. We determined rates of OS at the time of hysterectomy and tubal sterilization and examined how they changed over the study period. Methods: Using data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Discharge Abstract Database and National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all Canadian provinces and territories (except Quebec) between the fiscal years 2011 and 2016, we conducted a descriptive analysis of all patients aged 15 years or older who underwent hysterectomy or tubal sterilization. We excluded those with diagnostic codes for any gynecologic cancer and those who underwent unilateral salpingectomy. We examined the proportion who had OS during their hysterectomy and compared the proportion of tubal sterilizations that were OS with the proportion that were tubal ligations. Results: A total of 318 528 participants were included in the study (mean age 42.5 yr). The proportion of hysterectomies that included OS increased from 15.4% in 2011 to 35.5% by 2016. With respect to tubal sterilization, the rate of OS increased from 6.5% of all tubal sterilizations in 2011 to 22.0% in 2016. There was considerable variation across jurisdictions in 2016, with British Columbia having the highest rates (53.2% of all hysterectomies and 74.0% of tubal sterilizations involved OS). Interpretation: The rates of OS increased between 2011 and 2016, but there was considerable variation across the included jurisdictions. Our study indicates room for rates of OS to increase across many of the included jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41594478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Campbell, Cynthia Dion, A. Uppal, C. Yansouni, D. Menzies
Background: Essential workers are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to estimate the yield, acceptability and cost of systematic workplace-based testing of asymptomatic essential workers for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: From Jan. 27 to Mar. 12, 2021, we prospectively recruited non–health care essential businesses in Montréal, Canada, through email or telephone contact. Two trained mobile teams, each composed of 2 non–health care professionals, visited businesses. Consenting asymptomatic employees provided saline gargle samples under supervision. Samples were analyzed by means of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). At businesses with outbreaks (≥ 2 participants with a positive result), we retested all participants with a negative result on initial testing. Our primary outcomes were yield (proportion of test results that were positive), acceptability (proportion of participants estimated to be present at the business who agreed to participate) and costs (including training, sample collection and analysis, and communicating results). Our secondary outcome was identification of factors associated with a positive test result on multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 366 businesses contacted, 69 (18.8%) agreed to participate. Nineteen businesses (28%) were manufacturers or suppliers, 12 (17%) were in auto sales or repair, and 11 (16%) were in childcare; the corresponding number of employees was 1225, 242 and 113. The median number of participants per business was 13 (interquartile range [IQR] 8–22). Of an estimated 2348 employees on site, 2128 (90.6%) participated (808 [38.0%] female, median age 48 [IQR 37–57] yr). Of the 2626 tests performed, 53 (2.0%) gave a positive result. Self-reported nonwhite ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–9.9) and a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result before the study (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8) were associated with a positive test result. Five businesses were experiencing an outbreak; at these businesses, 40/917 participants (4.4%) had a positive result on the initial test. We repeated testing for employees with initially negative results at 3 of these businesses over 2–3 weeks: 8/350 participants (2.3%) had a positive result on the second test, and none had a positive result on the third and fourth tests; no employer reported new positive results after our final visit (up to Mar. 26, 2021). At the remaining 64 businesses, 1211 participants were tested once, of whom 5 (0.4%) had a positive result. The per-person RT-PCR cost was $34, and all other costs, $8.67. Interpretation: On-site saline gargle sampling of essential workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing was acceptable and of modest cost, and appears most useful in the context of outbreaks. This sampling strategy should be evaluated further as a component of efforts to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Preprint: medRxiv — doi:10.1101/2021.05.12.21256956
{"title":"Systematic on-site testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection among asymptomatic essential workers in Montréal, Canada: a prospective observational and cost-assessment study","authors":"J. Campbell, Cynthia Dion, A. Uppal, C. Yansouni, D. Menzies","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210290","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Essential workers are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to estimate the yield, acceptability and cost of systematic workplace-based testing of asymptomatic essential workers for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: From Jan. 27 to Mar. 12, 2021, we prospectively recruited non–health care essential businesses in Montréal, Canada, through email or telephone contact. Two trained mobile teams, each composed of 2 non–health care professionals, visited businesses. Consenting asymptomatic employees provided saline gargle samples under supervision. Samples were analyzed by means of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). At businesses with outbreaks (≥ 2 participants with a positive result), we retested all participants with a negative result on initial testing. Our primary outcomes were yield (proportion of test results that were positive), acceptability (proportion of participants estimated to be present at the business who agreed to participate) and costs (including training, sample collection and analysis, and communicating results). Our secondary outcome was identification of factors associated with a positive test result on multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 366 businesses contacted, 69 (18.8%) agreed to participate. Nineteen businesses (28%) were manufacturers or suppliers, 12 (17%) were in auto sales or repair, and 11 (16%) were in childcare; the corresponding number of employees was 1225, 242 and 113. The median number of participants per business was 13 (interquartile range [IQR] 8–22). Of an estimated 2348 employees on site, 2128 (90.6%) participated (808 [38.0%] female, median age 48 [IQR 37–57] yr). Of the 2626 tests performed, 53 (2.0%) gave a positive result. Self-reported nonwhite ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–9.9) and a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result before the study (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.8) were associated with a positive test result. Five businesses were experiencing an outbreak; at these businesses, 40/917 participants (4.4%) had a positive result on the initial test. We repeated testing for employees with initially negative results at 3 of these businesses over 2–3 weeks: 8/350 participants (2.3%) had a positive result on the second test, and none had a positive result on the third and fourth tests; no employer reported new positive results after our final visit (up to Mar. 26, 2021). At the remaining 64 businesses, 1211 participants were tested once, of whom 5 (0.4%) had a positive result. The per-person RT-PCR cost was $34, and all other costs, $8.67. Interpretation: On-site saline gargle sampling of essential workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing was acceptable and of modest cost, and appears most useful in the context of outbreaks. This sampling strategy should be evaluated further as a component of efforts to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Preprint: medRxiv — doi:10.1101/2021.05.12.21256956","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48610492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patricia E. Lee, Robert Kozak, Nasrin Alavi, H. Mbareche, R. Kung, K. Murphy, Darian L. Perruzza, S. Jarvi, Elsa Salvant, N. Ladhani, A. Yee, L. Gagnon, R. Jenkinson, Grace Y. Liu
Background: The exposure risks to front-line health care workers caring for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery are unclear, and an understanding of sample types that may harbour virus is important for evaluating risk. We sought to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery was present in the peritoneal cavity of male and female patients, in the female reproductive tract, in the environment of the surgery or delivery suite (surgical instruments or equipment used, air or floors), and inside the masks of the attending health care workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from November 2020 to May 2021 at 2 tertiary academic Toronto hospitals, during urgent surgeries or obstetric deliveries for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in patient, environmental and air samples was identified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Air samples were collected using both active and passive sampling techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of health care workers’ masks positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We included adult patients with positive RT-PCR nasal swab undergoing obstetric delivery or urgent surgery (from across all surgical specialties). Results: A total of 32 patients (age 20–88 yr) were included. Nine patients had obstetric deliveries (6 cesarean deliveries), and 23 patients (14 male) required urgent surgery from the orthopedic or trauma, general surgery, burn, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, gastroenterology and gynecologic oncology divisions. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20 of 332 (6%) patient and environmental samples collected: 4 of 24 (17%) patient samples, 5 of 60 (8%) floor samples, 1 of 54 (2%) air samples, 10 of 23 (43%) surgical instrument or equipment samples, 0 of 24 cautery filter samples and 0 of 143 (95% confidence interval 0–0.026) inner surface of mask samples. Interpretation: During the study period of November 2020 to May 2021, we found evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a small but important number of samples obtained in the surgical and obstetric operative environment. The finding of no detectable virus inside the masks worn by the health care teams would suggest a low risk of infection for health care workers using appropriate personal protective equipment.
{"title":"Detection of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the operating room and birthing room setting: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Patricia E. Lee, Robert Kozak, Nasrin Alavi, H. Mbareche, R. Kung, K. Murphy, Darian L. Perruzza, S. Jarvi, Elsa Salvant, N. Ladhani, A. Yee, L. Gagnon, R. Jenkinson, Grace Y. Liu","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210321","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The exposure risks to front-line health care workers caring for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery are unclear, and an understanding of sample types that may harbour virus is important for evaluating risk. We sought to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing surgery or obstetric delivery was present in the peritoneal cavity of male and female patients, in the female reproductive tract, in the environment of the surgery or delivery suite (surgical instruments or equipment used, air or floors), and inside the masks of the attending health care workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from November 2020 to May 2021 at 2 tertiary academic Toronto hospitals, during urgent surgeries or obstetric deliveries for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in patient, environmental and air samples was identified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Air samples were collected using both active and passive sampling techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of health care workers’ masks positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We included adult patients with positive RT-PCR nasal swab undergoing obstetric delivery or urgent surgery (from across all surgical specialties). Results: A total of 32 patients (age 20–88 yr) were included. Nine patients had obstetric deliveries (6 cesarean deliveries), and 23 patients (14 male) required urgent surgery from the orthopedic or trauma, general surgery, burn, plastic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, gastroenterology and gynecologic oncology divisions. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 20 of 332 (6%) patient and environmental samples collected: 4 of 24 (17%) patient samples, 5 of 60 (8%) floor samples, 1 of 54 (2%) air samples, 10 of 23 (43%) surgical instrument or equipment samples, 0 of 24 cautery filter samples and 0 of 143 (95% confidence interval 0–0.026) inner surface of mask samples. Interpretation: During the study period of November 2020 to May 2021, we found evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a small but important number of samples obtained in the surgical and obstetric operative environment. The finding of no detectable virus inside the masks worn by the health care teams would suggest a low risk of infection for health care workers using appropriate personal protective equipment.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49575014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D. Farid, Patricia Li, D. da Costa, W. Afif, J. Szabo, K. Dasgupta, E. Rahme
Background: A bidirectional association between depression and diabetes exists, but has not been evaluated in the context of immigrant status. Given that social determinants of health differ between immigrants and nonimmigrants, we evaluated the association between diabetes and depression incidence, depression and diabetes incidence, and whether immigrant status modified this association, among immigrants and nonimmigrants in Canada. Methods: We employed a retrospective cohort design using data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive cohort (baseline [2012–2015] and 3-year follow-up [2015–2018]). We defined participants as having diabetes if they self-reported it or if their glycated hemoglobin A1c level was 7% or more; we defined participants as having depression if their Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression score was 10 or higher or if they were currently undergoing depression treatment. We excluded those with baseline depression (Cohort 1) and baseline diabetes (Cohort 2) to evaluate the associations between diabetes and depression incidence, and between depression and diabetes incidence, respectively. We constructed logistic regression models with interaction by immigrant status. Results: Cohort 1 (n = 20 723; mean age 62.7 yr, standard deviation [SD] 10.1 yr; 47.6% female) included 3766 (18.2%) immigrants. Among immigrants, 16.4% had diabetes, compared with 15.6% among nonimmigrants. Diabetes was associated with an increased risk of depression in nonimmigrants (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.49), but not in immigrants (adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80–1.56). Younger age, female sex, weight change, poor sleep quality and pain increased depression risk. Cohort 2 (n = 22 054; mean age 62.1 yr, SD 10.1 yr; 52.2% female) included 3913 (17.7%) immigrants. Depression was associated with an increased risk of diabetes in both nonimmigrants (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.68) and immigrants (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08–2.37). Younger age, male sex, waist circumference, weight change, hypertension and heart disease increased diabetes risk. Interpretation: We found an overall bidirectional association between diabetes and depression that was not significantly modified by immigrant status. Screening for diabetes for people with depression and screening for depression for those with diabetes should be considered.
{"title":"Depression, diabetes and immigration status: a retrospective cohort study using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging","authors":"D. Farid, Patricia Li, D. da Costa, W. Afif, J. Szabo, K. Dasgupta, E. Rahme","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210019","url":null,"abstract":"Background: A bidirectional association between depression and diabetes exists, but has not been evaluated in the context of immigrant status. Given that social determinants of health differ between immigrants and nonimmigrants, we evaluated the association between diabetes and depression incidence, depression and diabetes incidence, and whether immigrant status modified this association, among immigrants and nonimmigrants in Canada. Methods: We employed a retrospective cohort design using data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive cohort (baseline [2012–2015] and 3-year follow-up [2015–2018]). We defined participants as having diabetes if they self-reported it or if their glycated hemoglobin A1c level was 7% or more; we defined participants as having depression if their Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression score was 10 or higher or if they were currently undergoing depression treatment. We excluded those with baseline depression (Cohort 1) and baseline diabetes (Cohort 2) to evaluate the associations between diabetes and depression incidence, and between depression and diabetes incidence, respectively. We constructed logistic regression models with interaction by immigrant status. Results: Cohort 1 (n = 20 723; mean age 62.7 yr, standard deviation [SD] 10.1 yr; 47.6% female) included 3766 (18.2%) immigrants. Among immigrants, 16.4% had diabetes, compared with 15.6% among nonimmigrants. Diabetes was associated with an increased risk of depression in nonimmigrants (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.49), but not in immigrants (adjusted OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80–1.56). Younger age, female sex, weight change, poor sleep quality and pain increased depression risk. Cohort 2 (n = 22 054; mean age 62.1 yr, SD 10.1 yr; 52.2% female) included 3913 (17.7%) immigrants. Depression was associated with an increased risk of diabetes in both nonimmigrants (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.68) and immigrants (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08–2.37). Younger age, male sex, waist circumference, weight change, hypertension and heart disease increased diabetes risk. Interpretation: We found an overall bidirectional association between diabetes and depression that was not significantly modified by immigrant status. Screening for diabetes for people with depression and screening for depression for those with diabetes should be considered.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43681261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. Dayan, M. Velez, S. Vigod, J. Pudwell, M. Djerboua, D. Fell, O. Basso, T. Nguyen, K. Joseph, J. Ray
Background: Subfertility and infertility treatment can be stressful experiences, but it is unknown whether each predisposes to postpartum mental illness. We sought to evaluate associations between subfertility or infertility treatment and postpartum mental illness. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study of individuals without pre-existing mental illness who gave birth in Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2014, stratified by fertility exposure: subfertility without infertility treatment; noninvasive infertility treatment (intrauterine insemination); invasive infertility treatment (in vitro fertilization); and no reproductive assistance. The primary outcome was mental illness occurring 365 days or sooner after birth (defined as ≥ 2 outpatient visits, an emergency department visit or a hospital admission with a mood, anxiety, psychotic, or substance use disorder, self-harm event or other mental illness). We used multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance to assess associations between fertility exposure and postpartum mental illness. Results: The study cohort comprised 786 064 births (mean age 30.42 yr, standard deviation 5.30 yr), including 78 283 with subfertility without treatment, 9178 with noninvasive infertility treatment, 9633 with invasive infertility treatment and 688 970 without reproductive assistance. Postpartum mental illness occurred in 60.8 per 1000 births among individuals without reproductive assistance. Relative to individuals without reproductive assistance, those with subfertility had a higher adjusted relative risk of postpartum mental illness (1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.10–1.17), which was similar in noninvasive and invasive infertility treatment groups. Interpretation: Subfertility or infertility treatment conferred a slightly higher risk of postpartum mental illness compared with no reproductive assistance. Further research should elucidate whether the stress of infertility, its treatment or physician selection contributes to this association.
{"title":"Infertility treatment and postpartum mental illness: a population-based cohort study","authors":"N. Dayan, M. Velez, S. Vigod, J. Pudwell, M. Djerboua, D. Fell, O. Basso, T. Nguyen, K. Joseph, J. Ray","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210269","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Subfertility and infertility treatment can be stressful experiences, but it is unknown whether each predisposes to postpartum mental illness. We sought to evaluate associations between subfertility or infertility treatment and postpartum mental illness. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study of individuals without pre-existing mental illness who gave birth in Ontario, Canada, from 2006 to 2014, stratified by fertility exposure: subfertility without infertility treatment; noninvasive infertility treatment (intrauterine insemination); invasive infertility treatment (in vitro fertilization); and no reproductive assistance. The primary outcome was mental illness occurring 365 days or sooner after birth (defined as ≥ 2 outpatient visits, an emergency department visit or a hospital admission with a mood, anxiety, psychotic, or substance use disorder, self-harm event or other mental illness). We used multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance to assess associations between fertility exposure and postpartum mental illness. Results: The study cohort comprised 786 064 births (mean age 30.42 yr, standard deviation 5.30 yr), including 78 283 with subfertility without treatment, 9178 with noninvasive infertility treatment, 9633 with invasive infertility treatment and 688 970 without reproductive assistance. Postpartum mental illness occurred in 60.8 per 1000 births among individuals without reproductive assistance. Relative to individuals without reproductive assistance, those with subfertility had a higher adjusted relative risk of postpartum mental illness (1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.10–1.17), which was similar in noninvasive and invasive infertility treatment groups. Interpretation: Subfertility or infertility treatment conferred a slightly higher risk of postpartum mental illness compared with no reproductive assistance. Further research should elucidate whether the stress of infertility, its treatment or physician selection contributes to this association.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45739427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nathan C. Nickel, J. Enns, Julianne Sanguins, Carrie O’Conaill, D. Chateau, S. Driedger, Carole R Taylor, Gilles Detillieux, Miyosha Tso Deh, Emily Brownell, A. Chartrand, Alan Katz
Background: Amid rising concern about opioid use across Canada, Métis leaders in Manitoba are seeking information on prescription opioid dispensing in Red River Métis populations to assist with planning and implementing appropriate evidence-based harm-reduction strategies in their communities. We examined patterns of prescription opioid dispensing among Red River Métis and compared them to those among other residents of Manitoba. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study for fiscal years 2006/07–2018/19 using administrative data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository and a study designed in partnership with researchers from the Manitoba Métis Federation. We compared age- and sex-adjusted rates of prescription opioid dispensing and mean morphine equivalents (MEQ) between Red River Métis and all other Manitobans aged 10 years or older, in accordance with Indigenous data sovereignty principles. To better understand what was driving any differences in patterns of prescription opioid dispensing between the 2 groups, we stratified the groups by age, sex, urbanicity, number of comorbidities, income quintile and opioid type, and compared patterns in MEQ/person. Results: The 2018/19 cohort included 76 755 Red River Métis and 1 117 854 other Manitobans. Other Manitobans were more likely than Red River Métis to be in higher income quintiles and to live in urban areas, and were less likely to have been diagnosed with a mood or anxiety disorder or a substance use disorder in the previous 5 years. The rate of prescription opioid dispensing and the opioid-associated MEQ/person were consistently higher among Red River Métis than among other Manitobans in each study year (p < 0.001). The rate of prescription opioid dispensing declined and the MEQ/person rose among other Manitobans over the study period but did not change among Red River Métis. Interpretation: The rate of prescription opioid dispensing and the potency of prescribed opioids were higher among Red River Métis in Manitoba than among other Manitobans. Further investigation into the different dispensing patterns between the 2 groups and the potential opioid-related harms they may herald is warranted.
{"title":"Patterns of prescription opioid dispensing among Red River Métis in Manitoba, Canada: a retrospective longitudinal cross-sectional study","authors":"Nathan C. Nickel, J. Enns, Julianne Sanguins, Carrie O’Conaill, D. Chateau, S. Driedger, Carole R Taylor, Gilles Detillieux, Miyosha Tso Deh, Emily Brownell, A. Chartrand, Alan Katz","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210025","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Amid rising concern about opioid use across Canada, Métis leaders in Manitoba are seeking information on prescription opioid dispensing in Red River Métis populations to assist with planning and implementing appropriate evidence-based harm-reduction strategies in their communities. We examined patterns of prescription opioid dispensing among Red River Métis and compared them to those among other residents of Manitoba. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study for fiscal years 2006/07–2018/19 using administrative data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository and a study designed in partnership with researchers from the Manitoba Métis Federation. We compared age- and sex-adjusted rates of prescription opioid dispensing and mean morphine equivalents (MEQ) between Red River Métis and all other Manitobans aged 10 years or older, in accordance with Indigenous data sovereignty principles. To better understand what was driving any differences in patterns of prescription opioid dispensing between the 2 groups, we stratified the groups by age, sex, urbanicity, number of comorbidities, income quintile and opioid type, and compared patterns in MEQ/person. Results: The 2018/19 cohort included 76 755 Red River Métis and 1 117 854 other Manitobans. Other Manitobans were more likely than Red River Métis to be in higher income quintiles and to live in urban areas, and were less likely to have been diagnosed with a mood or anxiety disorder or a substance use disorder in the previous 5 years. The rate of prescription opioid dispensing and the opioid-associated MEQ/person were consistently higher among Red River Métis than among other Manitobans in each study year (p < 0.001). The rate of prescription opioid dispensing declined and the MEQ/person rose among other Manitobans over the study period but did not change among Red River Métis. Interpretation: The rate of prescription opioid dispensing and the potency of prescribed opioids were higher among Red River Métis in Manitoba than among other Manitobans. Further investigation into the different dispensing patterns between the 2 groups and the potential opioid-related harms they may herald is warranted.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42078327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-08Print Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210249
Lindsay Obress, Olaf Berke, David N Fisman, Ashleigh R Tuite, Amy L Greer
Background: As the largest city in Canada, Toronto has played an important role in the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Ontario, and the burden of disease across Toronto neighbourhoods has shown considerable heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial variation of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases in Toronto neighbourhoods by detecting clusters of increased risk and investigating effects of neighbourhood-level risk factors on rates.
Methods: Data on sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases, at the neighbourhood level, for Jan. 25 to Nov. 26, 2020, were obtained from the City of Toronto COVID-19 dashboard. We used a flexibly shaped spatial scan to detect clusters of increased risk of sporadic COVID-19. We then used a generalized linear geostatistical model to investigate whether average household size, population density, dependency ratio and prevalence of low-income households were associated with sporadic SARS-CoV-2 rates.
Results: We identified 3 clusters of elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with standardized morbidity ratios ranging from 1.59 to 2.43. The generalized linear geostatistical model found that average household size (relative risk [RR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-2.61) and percentage of low-income households (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04) were significant predictors of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases at the neighbourhood level.
Interpretation: During the study period, 3 clusters of increased risk of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified, and average household size and percentage of low-income households were found to be associated with sporadic SARS-CoV-2 rates at the neighbourhood level. The findings of this study can be used to target resources and create policy to address inequities that are shown through heterogeneity of SARS-CoV-2 cases at the neighbourhood level in Toronto, Ontario.
{"title":"Sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases at the neighbourhood level in Toronto, Ontario, 2020: a spatial analysis of the early pandemic period.","authors":"Lindsay Obress, Olaf Berke, David N Fisman, Ashleigh R Tuite, Amy L Greer","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210249","DOIUrl":"10.9778/cmajo.20210249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the largest city in Canada, Toronto has played an important role in the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Ontario, and the burden of disease across Toronto neighbourhoods has shown considerable heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the spatial variation of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases in Toronto neighbourhoods by detecting clusters of increased risk and investigating effects of neighbourhood-level risk factors on rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases, at the neighbourhood level, for Jan. 25 to Nov. 26, 2020, were obtained from the City of Toronto COVID-19 dashboard. We used a flexibly shaped spatial scan to detect clusters of increased risk of sporadic COVID-19. We then used a generalized linear geostatistical model to investigate whether average household size, population density, dependency ratio and prevalence of low-income households were associated with sporadic SARS-CoV-2 rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3 clusters of elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with standardized morbidity ratios ranging from 1.59 to 2.43. The generalized linear geostatistical model found that average household size (relative risk [RR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-2.61) and percentage of low-income households (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.04) were significant predictors of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 cases at the neighbourhood level.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>During the study period, 3 clusters of increased risk of sporadic SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified, and average household size and percentage of low-income households were found to be associated with sporadic SARS-CoV-2 rates at the neighbourhood level. The findings of this study can be used to target resources and create policy to address inequities that are shown through heterogeneity of SARS-CoV-2 cases at the neighbourhood level in Toronto, Ontario.</p>","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9259452/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46629833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015–2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.
{"title":"Patterns of up-to-date status for colorectal cancer screening in Alberta: a cross-sectional study using survey data","authors":"K. Adhikari, Huiming Yang, G. Teare","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210051","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015–2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43946710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Margot Gunning, A. D. Rotenberg, L. E. Kelly, Bruce Crooks, Sapna Oberoi, A. Rapoport, S. R. Rassekh, J. Illes
Background: The use of cannabis for medical purposes by pediatric patients is expanding across Canada; however, supporting evidence, federal regulations and treatment guidelines are lacking. To understand factors affecting treatment decisions in this landscape, we sought to delineate clinician perspectives, ethics priorities and values for cannabis authorization. Methods: We sampled participants purposefully through Canadian Childhood Cannabinoid Clinical Trials listservs, which include the majority of pediatric oncologists and palliative care physicians practising in Canada, among many other pediatric physicians and clinicians. Inclusion criteria were being a practising clinician in Canada, involvement in the care of children and willingness to be interviewed regardless of stance on medical cannabis. In November and December 2020, we conducted semistructured interviews focusing on principles, values and priorities, including medical, professional, regulatory, evidentiary and social considerations, for authorizing medical cannabis to children. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of deductive and inductive thematic methods. Results: We conducted 18 interviews with a diverse group of clinicians representing a range of specialties within pediatric care, including neurology, palliative care, oncology, family medicine and pharmacology. The interviews yielded 4 themes and 12 subthemes related to a priori (medical, professional, regulatory, evidentiary and social themes) and emergent themes. The 4 themes of access, relationships and relational autonomy (autonomy within relationships), medically appropriate use and research priorities were grounded in principles of harm reduction. Participants described problematic authorization procedures that negatively affect patient use. Principles associated with relational autonomy were highlighted as a feature of open clinical communication. Benefits of appropriate medical uses weighed positively over risks, even in the context of potential effects on neurodevelopment. Participants expressed that more research is essential to align medical cannabis with biomedical standards. Interpretation: Clinicians reported pursuing ethical use of medical cannabis for pediatric patients and prioritizing their safety under principles of harm reduction. There is a need for evidence about neurodevelopmental risks, support for research, treatment guidelines and greater knowledge about stakeholder perspectives to alleviate burdens related to use of medical cannabis for pediatric patients in Canada.
{"title":"Clinician views on and ethics priorities for authorizing medical cannabis in the care of children and youth in Canada: a qualitative study","authors":"Margot Gunning, A. D. Rotenberg, L. E. Kelly, Bruce Crooks, Sapna Oberoi, A. Rapoport, S. R. Rassekh, J. Illes","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210239","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of cannabis for medical purposes by pediatric patients is expanding across Canada; however, supporting evidence, federal regulations and treatment guidelines are lacking. To understand factors affecting treatment decisions in this landscape, we sought to delineate clinician perspectives, ethics priorities and values for cannabis authorization. Methods: We sampled participants purposefully through Canadian Childhood Cannabinoid Clinical Trials listservs, which include the majority of pediatric oncologists and palliative care physicians practising in Canada, among many other pediatric physicians and clinicians. Inclusion criteria were being a practising clinician in Canada, involvement in the care of children and willingness to be interviewed regardless of stance on medical cannabis. In November and December 2020, we conducted semistructured interviews focusing on principles, values and priorities, including medical, professional, regulatory, evidentiary and social considerations, for authorizing medical cannabis to children. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by means of deductive and inductive thematic methods. Results: We conducted 18 interviews with a diverse group of clinicians representing a range of specialties within pediatric care, including neurology, palliative care, oncology, family medicine and pharmacology. The interviews yielded 4 themes and 12 subthemes related to a priori (medical, professional, regulatory, evidentiary and social themes) and emergent themes. The 4 themes of access, relationships and relational autonomy (autonomy within relationships), medically appropriate use and research priorities were grounded in principles of harm reduction. Participants described problematic authorization procedures that negatively affect patient use. Principles associated with relational autonomy were highlighted as a feature of open clinical communication. Benefits of appropriate medical uses weighed positively over risks, even in the context of potential effects on neurodevelopment. Participants expressed that more research is essential to align medical cannabis with biomedical standards. Interpretation: Clinicians reported pursuing ethical use of medical cannabis for pediatric patients and prioritizing their safety under principles of harm reduction. There is a need for evidence about neurodevelopmental risks, support for research, treatment guidelines and greater knowledge about stakeholder perspectives to alleviate burdens related to use of medical cannabis for pediatric patients in Canada.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46031306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：