Pub Date : 2025-09-19eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf119
Hanyu Wang, Robert Clarke, Christiana Kartsonaki, Iona Millwood, Robin Walters, Michael Hill, Daniel Avery, Canqing Yu, DianJian-Yi Sun, Jun Lv, Shanpeng Li, Liming Li, Zhengming Chen, Neil Wright, Derrick A Bennett
Aims: Little is known about the importance of blood lipids for risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in Chinese vs. European populations. We compared the associations with MI of apolioprotein B (ApoB) vs. low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and remnant-cholesterol (remnant-C) vs. triglycerides in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) and UK Biobank (UKB).
Methods and results: Plasma levels of LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), non-HDL-C, remnant-C, LDL-C/ApoB, and HDL-C/ApoA1 ratios were measured in a nested case-control study of MI (948 cases, 6101 controls) in CKB and a prospective study (5344 cases in 279 989 participants) in UKB. Associations of lipids with MI were assessed using logistic regression in CKB and Cox regression in UKB after adjustment for confounders and correction for regression dilution. The mean levels of LDL-C were about 30% lower in CKB than in UKB [2.3 (0.6) vs. 3.7 (0.8) mmol/L], but mean levels of HDL-C were comparable [1.3 (0.3) vs. 1.5 (0.4) mmol/L], as were those for triglycerides [1.8 (1.1) vs. 1.7 (1.1) mmol/L]. While the rate ratios (RRs) of MI for 1 SD higher usual levels of LDL-C in Chinese were about half those in Europeans (1.27; 1.13-1.44 vs. 1.55; 1.49-1.61), the corresponding RRs for ApoB or non-HDL with MI were comparable between Chinese and Europeans.
Conclusion: The findings reinforce current guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in China that advocate initiation of statin treatment in individuals at high-risk of ASCVD rather than high levels of LDL-C.
{"title":"Contrasting associations of blood lipids with risk of myocardial infarction in Chinese and European adults.","authors":"Hanyu Wang, Robert Clarke, Christiana Kartsonaki, Iona Millwood, Robin Walters, Michael Hill, Daniel Avery, Canqing Yu, DianJian-Yi Sun, Jun Lv, Shanpeng Li, Liming Li, Zhengming Chen, Neil Wright, Derrick A Bennett","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf119","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Little is known about the importance of blood lipids for risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in Chinese vs. European populations. We compared the associations with MI of apolioprotein B (ApoB) vs. low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and remnant-cholesterol (remnant-C) vs. triglycerides in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) and UK Biobank (UKB).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Plasma levels of LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), non-HDL-C, remnant-C, LDL-C/ApoB, and HDL-C/ApoA1 ratios were measured in a nested case-control study of MI (948 cases, 6101 controls) in CKB and a prospective study (5344 cases in 279 989 participants) in UKB. Associations of lipids with MI were assessed using logistic regression in CKB and Cox regression in UKB after adjustment for confounders and correction for regression dilution. The mean levels of LDL-C were about 30% lower in CKB than in UKB [2.3 (0.6) vs. 3.7 (0.8) mmol/L], but mean levels of HDL-C were comparable [1.3 (0.3) vs. 1.5 (0.4) mmol/L], as were those for triglycerides [1.8 (1.1) vs. 1.7 (1.1) mmol/L]. While the rate ratios (RRs) of MI for 1 SD higher usual levels of LDL-C in Chinese were about half those in Europeans (1.27; 1.13-1.44 vs. 1.55; 1.49-1.61), the corresponding RRs for ApoB or non-HDL with MI were comparable between Chinese and Europeans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings reinforce current guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in China that advocate initiation of statin treatment in individuals at high-risk of ASCVD rather than high levels of LDL-C.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12514723/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145282292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-18eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf106
Vincenzo Castiglione, Francesco Gentile, Giuseppe Vergaro
{"title":"Myocardial deformation imaging to monitor treatment response in AL amyloidosis: is it worth the strain?","authors":"Vincenzo Castiglione, Francesco Gentile, Giuseppe Vergaro","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf106","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf106","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449079/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-18eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf104
Kristine H Jang, Anthony F Yu, Heather Landau, Xiaoyue Ma, Richard K Cheng, Mathew S Mauer, Katherine Lee Chuy, Daniel Lenihan, Ji Can Yang, Carol L Chen, Jennifer E Liu
Aims: Cardiac impairment in AL amyloidosis is the major determinant of survival. Treatment goals include reducing circulating light chains to improve organ function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an independent predictor of survival and useful for assessing cardiac function before and after therapy. This study aimed to describe GLS change from baseline to one year post-treatment, identify factors associated with GLS improvement (GLS+), and evaluate its prognostic significance.
Methods and results: Ninety-seven patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac stage II/III disease who underwent echocardiogram and haematologic evaluation at baseline and one year were included. GLS+ was defined as a 2.0%-point increase. A cardiac or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP+) response was defined as a 30% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was measured from baseline echocardiogram to death. Of 97 patients, 62% had Stage II, 29% Stage IIIa, and 9% Stage IIIb disease. Baseline median left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS, and septal thickness were 65%, -14.9%, and 1.3 cm, respectively. GLS+ was observed in 36% of patients and BNP+ in 51%. Median overall survival was 113.4 months. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.42 in the GLS+ group and 0.46 in the BNP+ group, after adjusting for haematologic response.
Conclusion: GLS improvement post-treatment confers a significant survival benefit. This study supports GLS as an important marker for risk stratification and cardiac response.
{"title":"Improvement in global longitudinal strain following plasma cell-directed therapy is associated with long-term survival among patients with AL amyloidosis.","authors":"Kristine H Jang, Anthony F Yu, Heather Landau, Xiaoyue Ma, Richard K Cheng, Mathew S Mauer, Katherine Lee Chuy, Daniel Lenihan, Ji Can Yang, Carol L Chen, Jennifer E Liu","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf104","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiac impairment in AL amyloidosis is the major determinant of survival. Treatment goals include reducing circulating light chains to improve organ function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an independent predictor of survival and useful for assessing cardiac function before and after therapy. This study aimed to describe GLS change from baseline to one year post-treatment, identify factors associated with GLS improvement (GLS+), and evaluate its prognostic significance.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Ninety-seven patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac stage II/III disease who underwent echocardiogram and haematologic evaluation at baseline and one year were included. GLS+ was defined as a 2.0%-point increase. A cardiac or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP+) response was defined as a 30% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was measured from baseline echocardiogram to death. Of 97 patients, 62% had Stage II, 29% Stage IIIa, and 9% Stage IIIb disease. Baseline median left ventricular ejection fraction, GLS, and septal thickness were 65%, -14.9%, and 1.3 cm, respectively. GLS+ was observed in 36% of patients and BNP+ in 51%. Median overall survival was 113.4 months. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.42 in the GLS+ group and 0.46 in the BNP+ group, after adjusting for haematologic response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLS improvement post-treatment confers a significant survival benefit. This study supports GLS as an important marker for risk stratification and cardiac response.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449083/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115658","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118
Lineke Derks, Marijke J C Timmermans, Daniel M F Claassens, Dennis van Veghel, Krischan D Sjauw, Peter Danse, Karin Arkenbout, Dirk J van der Heijden
Aims: Over recent decades, numerous measures have been implemented to improve treatment and timely intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For deeper insights into the current state of care, this study investigates whether patient outcomes differ based on the timing of presentation (on-hours vs. off-hours) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.
Methods and results: Data from STEMI PCIs performed from 2017 to October 2020, as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), were analysed. Off-hours presentation was defined as arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) on weekends, during working days between 17.00 and 08.00, or Monday between midnight and 08.00. Short-term outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and acute MI within 30 days. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality rates up till 5 years after PCI, target vessel revascularization within 1 year, and repeat revascularization with elective or non-STEMI PCI. The study included 19 090 STEMI patients from 17 centres, with 11 719 (61.4%) PCIs performed on-hours. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed between on-hours and off-hours patients (5.7% vs. 5.8%). On-hours patients had a longer time from symptom onset to cath lab arrival (≤6 h: 80.2% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001) and were less likely to present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (7.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed after adjusting for confounders.
Conclusion: Outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI are comparable between on-hours and off-hours presentations. The quality of care appears to be independent of time of arrival at the cath lab.
目的:近几十年来,已经实施了许多措施来改善st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗和及时干预。为了更深入地了解目前的护理状况,本研究调查了STEMI患者的初步经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的就诊时间(上班时间与下班时间)是否会影响患者的预后。方法和结果:分析2017年至2020年10月在荷兰心脏登记(NHR)中登记的STEMI pci数据。非工作时间就诊被定义为周末、工作日17.00至08.00或周一午夜至08.00期间到导管室就诊。短期结果包括30天内全因死亡率和30天内急性心肌梗死。长期结果包括PCI术后5年的全因死亡率,1年内的靶血管重建术,选择性或非stemi PCI的重复血管重建术。该研究包括来自17个中心的19090例STEMI患者,其中11719例(61.4%)的pci是按小时进行的。上班和下班患者的30天死亡率无显著差异(5.7%对5.8%)。非值班患者从症状出现到到达导管室的时间较长(≤6小时:80.2% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001),院外心脏骤停发生率较低(7.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,观察到长期结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:STEMI患者在上班时间和下班时间接受PCI治疗后的结果具有可比性。护理质量似乎与到达导管室的时间无关。
{"title":"Netherlands Heart Registration-based multicentre retrospective cohort study on primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparing patient relevant outcomes in on- vs. off-hour presentations.","authors":"Lineke Derks, Marijke J C Timmermans, Daniel M F Claassens, Dennis van Veghel, Krischan D Sjauw, Peter Danse, Karin Arkenbout, Dirk J van der Heijden","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Over recent decades, numerous measures have been implemented to improve treatment and timely intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For deeper insights into the current state of care, this study investigates whether patient outcomes differ based on the timing of presentation (on-hours vs. off-hours) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data from STEMI PCIs performed from 2017 to October 2020, as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), were analysed. Off-hours presentation was defined as arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) on weekends, during working days between 17.00 and 08.00, or Monday between midnight and 08.00. Short-term outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and acute MI within 30 days. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality rates up till 5 years after PCI, target vessel revascularization within 1 year, and repeat revascularization with elective or non-STEMI PCI. The study included 19 090 STEMI patients from 17 centres, with 11 719 (61.4%) PCIs performed on-hours. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed between on-hours and off-hours patients (5.7% vs. 5.8%). On-hours patients had a longer time from symptom onset to cath lab arrival (≤6 h: 80.2% vs. 84.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and were less likely to present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (7.6% vs. 9.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed after adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI are comparable between on-hours and off-hours presentations. The quality of care appears to be independent of time of arrival at the cath lab.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492485/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-16eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095
Carlo A Pivato, Ottavia Cozzi, Nicole Fontana, Francesca Ieva, Gianluigi Condorelli, Cosmo Godino, Bernhard Reimers, Masaaki Nakase, Karsten Hug, Tobias Rheude, Antonio J Munoz-Garcia, Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz, Alfonso Ielasi, Marco Barbanti, Luigi Biasco, Darren Mylotte, Massimo Leoncini, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Giorgio Quadri, Ferdinando Varbella, Angelo Anzuini, Diego Lopez, Philippe Garot, Jorn Brouwer, Antonio Mangieri, Damiano Regazzoli, Luca Testa, Jorge Sanz Sanchez, Daijiro Tomii, Alaide Chieffo, Michael Joner, Gennaro Sardella, Enrico Cerrato, Luis Nombela-Franco, Thomas Pilgrim, Giulio Stefanini
Aims: The number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to increase, but their prognosis remains poorly understood.
Methods and results: Consecutive PCI patients with prior TAVR were compared to patients without prior TAVR between 2008 and 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. An entropy balance approach was implemented to adjust for imbalances in patient and procedural characteristics. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using weighted Cox regression models. Comparing 420 PCI patients with prior TAVR (mean age 80.8 years, 37.1% women) to 1197 without (mean age 70.4 years, 24.6% women), 1-year MACE was higher in the prior TAVR group (8.7 vs. 3.7%; unadjusted HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, prior TAVR remained associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.08-5.16; P = 0.032). This was primarily driven by higher cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, P = 0.032), while the association with myocardial infarction was attenuated post-adjustment and no longer statistically significant.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing PCI after TAVR experience a higher incidence of MACE compared to those undergoing PCI without prior TAVR, underscoring the importance of accurate patient selection before performing PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and history of TAVR.
目的:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者数量预计会增加,但其预后仍不清楚。方法和结果:2008年至2023年间,连续PCI患者与既往TAVR患者进行比较。Kaplan-Meier方法用于估计1年内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,MACE定义为心血管死亡或心肌梗死的复合。采用熵平衡方法来调整患者和程序特征的不平衡。校正风险比(hr)采用加权Cox回归模型估计。将420例有TAVR的PCI患者(平均年龄80.8岁,女性37.1%)与1197例无TAVR的患者(平均年龄70.4岁,女性24.6%)进行比较,有TAVR组1年MACE较高(8.7比3.7%;未调整HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; P < 0.001)。在调整临床和手术特征后,既往TAVR仍与MACE风险增加相关(调整后危险度2.36,95% CI 1.08-5.16; P = 0.032)。这主要是由于较高的心血管死亡率(校正后HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, P = 0.032),而调整后与心肌梗死的关联减弱,不再具有统计学意义。结论:与没有TAVR的患者相比,TAVR后行PCI的患者MACE发生率更高,强调了对有TAVR病史的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者在行PCI前准确选择患者的重要性。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Carlo A Pivato, Ottavia Cozzi, Nicole Fontana, Francesca Ieva, Gianluigi Condorelli, Cosmo Godino, Bernhard Reimers, Masaaki Nakase, Karsten Hug, Tobias Rheude, Antonio J Munoz-Garcia, Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz, Alfonso Ielasi, Marco Barbanti, Luigi Biasco, Darren Mylotte, Massimo Leoncini, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Giorgio Quadri, Ferdinando Varbella, Angelo Anzuini, Diego Lopez, Philippe Garot, Jorn Brouwer, Antonio Mangieri, Damiano Regazzoli, Luca Testa, Jorge Sanz Sanchez, Daijiro Tomii, Alaide Chieffo, Michael Joner, Gennaro Sardella, Enrico Cerrato, Luis Nombela-Franco, Thomas Pilgrim, Giulio Stefanini","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to increase, but their prognosis remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive PCI patients with prior TAVR were compared to patients without prior TAVR between 2008 and 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. An entropy balance approach was implemented to adjust for imbalances in patient and procedural characteristics. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using weighted Cox regression models. Comparing 420 PCI patients with prior TAVR (mean age 80.8 years, 37.1% women) to 1197 without (mean age 70.4 years, 24.6% women), 1-year MACE was higher in the prior TAVR group (8.7 vs. 3.7%; unadjusted HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; <i>P</i> < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, prior TAVR remained associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.08-5.16; <i>P</i> = 0.032). This was primarily driven by higher cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, <i>P</i> = 0.032), while the association with myocardial infarction was attenuated post-adjustment and no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing PCI after TAVR experience a higher incidence of MACE compared to those undergoing PCI without prior TAVR, underscoring the importance of accurate patient selection before performing PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and history of TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448705/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-02eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117
Mamas A Mamas, Harold Bays, Runjia Li, Navneet Upadhyay, Tanya Irani, Cagri Senyucel, Julia P Dunn, Hong Liu-Seifert
Aims: Approximately two-thirds of obesity-related mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this analysis is to examine predicted CVD risk reduction following weight loss in persons with obesity for primary prevention between tirzepatide and semaglutide, and projected CVD events that could be potentially prevented in the USA.
Methods and results: SURMOUNT-5 was a Phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial conducted in participants with obesity and without Type-2 diabetes, comparing tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) with semaglutide (1.7 or 2.4 mg) and administered via weekly subcutaneous injection. Predicted 10-year CVD risks were compared between treatments at baseline and up to 72 weeks post-treatment among participants without prior CVD. The impact of cardiovascular risk reduction was estimated as the projected preventable CVD events over 10 years for tirzepatide and semaglutide in the USA. The average predicted 10-year CVD risk score before treatment was 9.3%. Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk compared with semaglutide (absolute reduction from baseline of 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). Translating risk reduction to the US population who met treatment eligibility criteria and without prior CVD (∼85 million), an estimated 2 million CVD events could be potentially prevented over 10 years after 72 weeks of tirzepatide treatment, vs. 1.15 million with semaglutide.
Conclusion: In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. This post hoc analysis suggests tirzepatide treatment may provide greater benefit in primary prevention of CVD than semaglutide in people with obesity and overweight.
{"title":"Tirzepatide compared with semaglutide and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk reduction in obesity: <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of the SURMOUNT-5 trial.","authors":"Mamas A Mamas, Harold Bays, Runjia Li, Navneet Upadhyay, Tanya Irani, Cagri Senyucel, Julia P Dunn, Hong Liu-Seifert","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Approximately two-thirds of obesity-related mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this analysis is to examine predicted CVD risk reduction following weight loss in persons with obesity for primary prevention between tirzepatide and semaglutide, and projected CVD events that could be potentially prevented in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>SURMOUNT-5 was a Phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial conducted in participants with obesity and without Type-2 diabetes, comparing tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) with semaglutide (1.7 or 2.4 mg) and administered via weekly subcutaneous injection. Predicted 10-year CVD risks were compared between treatments at baseline and up to 72 weeks post-treatment among participants without prior CVD. The impact of cardiovascular risk reduction was estimated as the projected preventable CVD events over 10 years for tirzepatide and semaglutide in the USA. The average predicted 10-year CVD risk score before treatment was 9.3%. Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk compared with semaglutide (absolute reduction from baseline of 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Translating risk reduction to the US population who met treatment eligibility criteria and without prior CVD (∼85 million), an estimated 2 million CVD events could be potentially prevented over 10 years after 72 weeks of tirzepatide treatment, vs. 1.15 million with semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. This <i>post hoc</i> analysis suggests tirzepatide treatment may provide greater benefit in primary prevention of CVD than semaglutide in people with obesity and overweight.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05822830.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mustafa Al-Jarshawi, Glen P Martin, Andrew Cole, Miguel Nobre Menezes, Richard K Cheng, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Eric H Yang, Mamas A Mamas
Aims: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the association of AAC with all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors.
Methods and results: Using 7 years of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013-2019), we analysed a nationally representative cohort of US cancer survivors. AAC burden was quantified using the Kauppila AAC-24 scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between AAC and all-cause mortality, while Fine and Gray models assessed associations between AAC and CV mortality, accounting for non-CV mortality as a competing risk. A total of 23 126 424 cancer survivors (aged ≥40 years) were analysed, recording 4 199 131 (114 unweighted) all-cause deaths and 1 160 618 (34 unweighted) CV deaths over a 69-month median follow-up. AAC was present in 46%, with 19.5% of the cohort showing severe AAC (AAC-24 > 6). Each one-unit increase in AAC-24 score was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality and CV mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval of 1.04 (1.00-1.09) and subdistribution hazard ratio 1.07 (1.02-1.12); P = 0.047 and P = 0.002, respectively] after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, traditional CV risk factors, baseline comorbidities, and cancer-specific characteristics.
Conclusion: AAC detected on DXA scans is independently associated with increased all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors aged 40 years and older. DXA-based AAC assessment may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cardio-oncology.
{"title":"Prognostic significance of abdominal aortic calcification scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans for mortality in cancer survivors: NHANES-based cohort study (2013-2019).","authors":"Mustafa Al-Jarshawi, Glen P Martin, Andrew Cole, Miguel Nobre Menezes, Richard K Cheng, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Eric H Yang, Mamas A Mamas","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf116","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the association of AAC with all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using 7 years of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013-2019), we analysed a nationally representative cohort of US cancer survivors. AAC burden was quantified using the Kauppila AAC-24 scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between AAC and all-cause mortality, while Fine and Gray models assessed associations between AAC and CV mortality, accounting for non-CV mortality as a competing risk. A total of 23 126 424 cancer survivors (aged ≥40 years) were analysed, recording 4 199 131 (114 unweighted) all-cause deaths and 1 160 618 (34 unweighted) CV deaths over a 69-month median follow-up. AAC was present in 46%, with 19.5% of the cohort showing severe AAC (AAC-24 > 6). Each one-unit increase in AAC-24 score was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality and CV mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval of 1.04 (1.00-1.09) and subdistribution hazard ratio 1.07 (1.02-1.12); <i>P</i> = 0.047 and <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively] after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, traditional CV risk factors, baseline comorbidities, and cancer-specific characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAC detected on DXA scans is independently associated with increased all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors aged 40 years and older. DXA-based AAC assessment may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cardio-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-29eCollection Date: 2025-09-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110
Joseph Kassab, Parth Desai, Neil Keshvani, Katy Lonergan, Amit Goyal, Ambarish Pandey, Saket Girotra, Dharam J Kumbhani
Aims: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis were excluded from major TAVR trials, and data comparing TAVR and SAVR in this population remain limited. To compare real-world, risk-adjusted outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with BAV stenosis.
Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX research network database. Adults (≥18 years) with echocardiographically confirmed BAV stenosis undergoing isolated TAVR or SAVR from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients with prior cardiac procedures or concomitant cardiac interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was used to balance covariates. Primary outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality, stroke, and valve re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included new pacemaker implantation (PPM), 30-day AKI, and bleeding. 5547 patients (TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103) were included. In unadjusted analysis, TAVR patients were sicker and older at baseline and had a higher risk of death and/or stroke compared with those who underwent SAVR (10.9% vs. 5.37%, P < 0.0001). Following PSM, 663 matched pairs were analyzed with all covariates balanced. At 2 years, all-cause mortality (TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, P = 0.71) and stroke (TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, P = 0.058) were similar between the two groups. Re-intervention rates were low and comparable. TAVR was associated with higher PPM rates but lower AKI and bleeding rates.
Conclusion: In propensity-matched BAV patients, TAVR and SAVR demonstrated comparable 2-year mortality, stroke, and re-intervention rates. These findings support TAVR as a viable option in appropriately selected BAV patients, warranting further prospective validation.
目的:双尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)狭窄的患者被排除在主要的TAVR试验之外,比较该人群TAVR和SAVR的数据仍然有限。比较BAV狭窄患者TAVR与SAVR在现实世界中的风险调整结果。方法和结果:我们使用TriNetX研究网络数据库进行回顾性队列分析。纳入2012年至2022年超声心动图证实BAV狭窄的成人(≥18岁)进行孤立性TAVR或SAVR。既往有心脏手术或合并心脏干预的患者被排除在外。倾向得分匹配(PSM)(1:1)用于平衡协变量。主要结局为2年全因死亡率、卒中和瓣膜再干预。次要结果包括新的起搏器植入(PPM)、30天AKI和出血。纳入5547例患者(TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103)。在未经调整的分析中,与接受SAVR的患者相比,TAVR患者在基线时病情更重,年龄更大,死亡和/或卒中的风险更高(10.9% vs. 5.37%, P < 0.0001)。采用PSM对663对配对进行分析,所有协变量平衡。2年时,两组的全因死亡率(TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, P = 0.71)和卒中(TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, P = 0.058)相似。再干预率低且具有可比性。TAVR与较高的PPM率相关,但与较低的AKI和出血率相关。结论:在倾向匹配的BAV患者中,TAVR和SAVR显示出相当的2年死亡率、卒中和再干预率。这些发现支持TAVR作为适当选择的BAV患者的可行选择,需要进一步的前瞻性验证。
{"title":"Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.","authors":"Joseph Kassab, Parth Desai, Neil Keshvani, Katy Lonergan, Amit Goyal, Ambarish Pandey, Saket Girotra, Dharam J Kumbhani","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis were excluded from major TAVR trials, and data comparing TAVR and SAVR in this population remain limited. To compare real-world, risk-adjusted outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with BAV stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX research network database. Adults (≥18 years) with echocardiographically confirmed BAV stenosis undergoing isolated TAVR or SAVR from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients with prior cardiac procedures or concomitant cardiac interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was used to balance covariates. Primary outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality, stroke, and valve re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included new pacemaker implantation (PPM), 30-day AKI, and bleeding. 5547 patients (TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103) were included. In unadjusted analysis, TAVR patients were sicker and older at baseline and had a higher risk of death and/or stroke compared with those who underwent SAVR (10.9% vs. 5.37%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Following PSM, 663 matched pairs were analyzed with all covariates balanced. At 2 years, all-cause mortality (TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.71) and stroke (TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.058) were similar between the two groups. Re-intervention rates were low and comparable. TAVR was associated with higher PPM rates but lower AKI and bleeding rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In propensity-matched BAV patients, TAVR and SAVR demonstrated comparable 2-year mortality, stroke, and re-intervention rates. These findings support TAVR as a viable option in appropriately selected BAV patients, warranting further prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395246/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Cancer survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to shared risk factors and treatment-related toxicity. The recently proposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome framework provides a novel approach for cardiometabolic risk stratification, but its prognostic value in cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between CKM stages and cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients using a large-scale nationwide dataset.
Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 76 111 cancer patients without prior CVD from the DeSC database (2014-2023). Participants were classified into CKM stages (0-3) at baseline, with Stage 4 defined as the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of progression to Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, advancing CKM stages were associated with a graded increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Compared to Stage 0-1 (reference), adjusted hazard ratios for Stage 4 were 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.33) for Stage 2 and 1.47 (1.36-1.60) for Stage 3. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent associations across different groups stratified by age, sex, chemotherapy history, and cancer types. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses using alternative risk prediction models or expanded CVD definitions yielded similar results.
Conclusion: The CKM staging system effectively stratifies cardiovascular risk in cancer patients, with higher stages predicting significantly worse outcomes. These findings advocate for integrating CKM assessment into onco-cardiologic practice to guide early intervention and improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage predicts cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients: a real-world data analysis of a nationwide epidemiological dataset.","authors":"Toshiyuki Ko, Yuta Suzuki, Hidehiro Kaneko, Akira Okada, Takahiro Jimba, Tatsuhiko Azegami, Atsushi Mizuno, Kentaro Ejiri, Katsuhito Fujiu, Norifumi Takeda, Hiroyuki Morita, Kaori Hayashi, Koichi Node, Hideo Yasunaga, Masaomi Nangaku, Norihiko Takeda","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cancer survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to shared risk factors and treatment-related toxicity. The recently proposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome framework provides a novel approach for cardiometabolic risk stratification, but its prognostic value in cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between CKM stages and cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients using a large-scale nationwide dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 76 111 cancer patients without prior CVD from the DeSC database (2014-2023). Participants were classified into CKM stages (0-3) at baseline, with Stage 4 defined as the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of progression to Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, advancing CKM stages were associated with a graded increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Compared to Stage 0-1 (reference), adjusted hazard ratios for Stage 4 were 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.33) for Stage 2 and 1.47 (1.36-1.60) for Stage 3. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent associations across different groups stratified by age, sex, chemotherapy history, and cancer types. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses using alternative risk prediction models or expanded CVD definitions yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CKM staging system effectively stratifies cardiovascular risk in cancer patients, with higher stages predicting significantly worse outcomes. These findings advocate for integrating CKM assessment into onco-cardiologic practice to guide early intervention and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448714/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate (IV-tolvaptan) is a novel aquaretic agent for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study evaluated its short-term effects and prognostic implications in clinical practice.
Methods and results: In this retrospective cohort of 169 consecutive ADHF patients receiving IV-tolvaptan for the first time (mean age 76.0 ± 12.7 years; 50.9% female), we measured hourly urine output over 6 h and assessed clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and 24 h post-dose. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. At 24 h, IV-tolvaptan significantly reduced body weight (mean difference: -1.1 ± 2.3 kg, P < 0.001), NT-proBNP (median change: -1704 pg/mL; P < 0.001), and urinary osmolality (mean change: -71.4 ± 169.4 mOsm/kg; P = 0.015), while raising serum sodium (mean change: 1.7 ± 2.9 mEq/L; P < 0.001). Six-hour urine output correlated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = 0.34; P < 0.001), urinary osmolality (r = 0.28; P = 0.003), and the change in serum sodium (r = 0.21; P = 0.005). In multivariable logistic regression, renal impairment (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) [odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.4; P < 0.001] and higher furosemide doses (>20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; P = 0.01) predicted reduced responsiveness, whereas first hospitalization (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; P = 0.04) and high urinary osmolality (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; P = 0.05) predicted favourable response. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a lower incidence of the primary endpoint in patients achieving ≥ 1000 mL urine output (log-rank P = 0.032).
Conclusion: Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate enhances decongestion and short-term outcomes in ADHF without worsening renal function. Early diuretic responsiveness is a robust prognostic marker.
目的:静脉注射托伐普坦磷酸钠(iv -托伐普坦)是一种治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的新型药物。本研究在临床实践中评估了其短期效果和预后意义。方法和结果:在169例首次接受iv -托伐坦治疗的ADHF患者(平均年龄76.0±12.7岁,50.9%为女性)的回顾性队列中,我们测量了6小时内的每小时尿量,并评估了基线和给药后24小时的临床和生化参数。主要终点是全因死亡率和心力衰竭再住院的综合指标。24 h时,IV-tolvaptan显著降低体重(平均差值:-1.1±2.3 kg, P < 0.001)、NT-proBNP(变化中值:-1704 pg/mL, P < 0.001)和尿渗透压(变化中值:-71.4±169.4 mOsm/kg, P = 0.015),同时提高血清钠(变化中值:1.7±2.9 mEq/L, P < 0.001)。6小时尿量与基线估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR) (r = 0.34; P < 0.001)、尿渗透压(r = 0.28; P = 0.003)和血清钠的变化(r = 0.21; P = 0.005)相关。在多变量logistic回归中,肾损害(eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2)[优势比(OR) 0.2;95%置信区间(CI) 0.1 ~ 0.4;P < 0.001]和较高呋塞米剂量(bbb20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; P = 0.01)预测反应性降低,而首次住院(OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; P = 0.04)和高尿渗透压(OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; P = 0.05)预测反应良好。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,尿量≥1000 mL的患者主要终点发生率较低(log-rank P = 0.032)。结论:静脉注射托伐普坦磷酸钠可改善ADHF患者的去充血和短期预后,且不会使肾功能恶化。早期利尿剂反应是一个强有力的预后指标。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of the acute reactiveness to intravenous administration of tolvaptan sodium phosphate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.","authors":"Shohei Ouchi, Hiroshi Iwata, Soshi Moriya, Ryo Naito, Norihito Takahashi, Takatoshi Kasai, Tohru Minamino","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf108","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate (IV-tolvaptan) is a novel aquaretic agent for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study evaluated its short-term effects and prognostic implications in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this retrospective cohort of 169 consecutive ADHF patients receiving IV-tolvaptan for the first time (mean age 76.0 ± 12.7 years; 50.9% female), we measured hourly urine output over 6 h and assessed clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and 24 h post-dose. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. At 24 h, IV-tolvaptan significantly reduced body weight (mean difference: -1.1 ± 2.3 kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001), NT-proBNP (median change: -1704 pg/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and urinary osmolality (mean change: -71.4 ± 169.4 mOsm/kg; <i>P</i> = 0.015), while raising serum sodium (mean change: 1.7 ± 2.9 mEq/L; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Six-hour urine output correlated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<i>r</i> = 0.34; <i>P</i> < 0.001), urinary osmolality (<i>r</i> = 0.28; <i>P</i> = 0.003), and the change in serum sodium (<i>r</i> = 0.21; <i>P</i> = 0.005). In multivariable logistic regression, renal impairment (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>) [odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.4; <i>P</i> < 0.001] and higher furosemide doses (>20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; <i>P</i> = 0.01) predicted reduced responsiveness, whereas first hospitalization (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and high urinary osmolality (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; <i>P</i> = 0.05) predicted favourable response. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a lower incidence of the primary endpoint in patients achieving ≥ 1000 mL urine output (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate enhances decongestion and short-term outcomes in ADHF without worsening renal function. Early diuretic responsiveness is a robust prognostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}