首页 > 最新文献

European heart journal open最新文献

英文 中文
Netherlands Heart Registration-based multicentre retrospective cohort study on primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparing patient relevant outcomes in on- vs. off-hour presentations. 基于心脏登记的多中心回顾性队列研究:st段抬高型心肌梗死的首次PCI治疗:比较患者在工作时间和下班时间的相关结果。
Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118
Lineke Derks, Marijke J C Timmermans, Daniel M F Claassens, Dennis van Veghel, Krischan D Sjauw, Peter Danse, Karin Arkenbout, Dirk J van der Heijden

Aims: Over recent decades, numerous measures have been implemented to improve treatment and timely intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For deeper insights into the current state of care, this study investigates whether patient outcomes differ based on the timing of presentation (on-hours vs. off-hours) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.

Methods and results: Data from STEMI PCIs performed from 2017 to October 2020, as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), were analysed. Off-hours presentation was defined as arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) on weekends, during working days between 17.00 and 08.00, or Monday between midnight and 08.00. Short-term outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and acute MI within 30 days. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality rates up till 5 years after PCI, target vessel revascularization within 1 year, and repeat revascularization with elective or non-STEMI PCI. The study included 19 090 STEMI patients from 17 centres, with 11 719 (61.4%) PCIs performed on-hours. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed between on-hours and off-hours patients (5.7% vs. 5.8%). On-hours patients had a longer time from symptom onset to cath lab arrival (≤6 h: 80.2% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001) and were less likely to present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (7.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusion: Outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI are comparable between on-hours and off-hours presentations. The quality of care appears to be independent of time of arrival at the cath lab.

目的:近几十年来,已经实施了许多措施来改善st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的治疗和及时干预。为了更深入地了解目前的护理状况,本研究调查了STEMI患者的初步经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的就诊时间(上班时间与下班时间)是否会影响患者的预后。方法和结果:分析2017年至2020年10月在荷兰心脏登记(NHR)中登记的STEMI pci数据。非工作时间就诊被定义为周末、工作日17.00至08.00或周一午夜至08.00期间到导管室就诊。短期结果包括30天内全因死亡率和30天内急性心肌梗死。长期结果包括PCI术后5年的全因死亡率,1年内的靶血管重建术,选择性或非stemi PCI的重复血管重建术。该研究包括来自17个中心的19090例STEMI患者,其中11719例(61.4%)的pci是按小时进行的。上班和下班患者的30天死亡率无显著差异(5.7%对5.8%)。非值班患者从症状出现到到达导管室的时间较长(≤6小时:80.2% vs. 84.4%, P < 0.001),院外心脏骤停发生率较低(7.6% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001)。在调整混杂因素后,观察到长期结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:STEMI患者在上班时间和下班时间接受PCI治疗后的结果具有可比性。护理质量似乎与到达导管室的时间无关。
{"title":"Netherlands Heart Registration-based multicentre retrospective cohort study on primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparing patient relevant outcomes in on- vs. off-hour presentations.","authors":"Lineke Derks, Marijke J C Timmermans, Daniel M F Claassens, Dennis van Veghel, Krischan D Sjauw, Peter Danse, Karin Arkenbout, Dirk J van der Heijden","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Over recent decades, numerous measures have been implemented to improve treatment and timely intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For deeper insights into the current state of care, this study investigates whether patient outcomes differ based on the timing of presentation (on-hours vs. off-hours) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data from STEMI PCIs performed from 2017 to October 2020, as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), were analysed. Off-hours presentation was defined as arrival at the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) on weekends, during working days between 17.00 and 08.00, or Monday between midnight and 08.00. Short-term outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and acute MI within 30 days. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality rates up till 5 years after PCI, target vessel revascularization within 1 year, and repeat revascularization with elective or non-STEMI PCI. The study included 19 090 STEMI patients from 17 centres, with 11 719 (61.4%) PCIs performed on-hours. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed between on-hours and off-hours patients (5.7% vs. 5.8%). On-hours patients had a longer time from symptom onset to cath lab arrival (≤6 h: 80.2% vs. 84.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and were less likely to present with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (7.6% vs. 9.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed after adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI are comparable between on-hours and off-hours presentations. The quality of care appears to be independent of time of arrival at the cath lab.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492485/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床效果。
Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095
Carlo A Pivato, Ottavia Cozzi, Nicole Fontana, Francesca Ieva, Gianluigi Condorelli, Cosmo Godino, Bernhard Reimers, Masaaki Nakase, Karsten Hug, Tobias Rheude, Antonio J Munoz-Garcia, Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz, Alfonso Ielasi, Marco Barbanti, Luigi Biasco, Darren Mylotte, Massimo Leoncini, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Giorgio Quadri, Ferdinando Varbella, Angelo Anzuini, Diego Lopez, Philippe Garot, Jorn Brouwer, Antonio Mangieri, Damiano Regazzoli, Luca Testa, Jorge Sanz Sanchez, Daijiro Tomii, Alaide Chieffo, Michael Joner, Gennaro Sardella, Enrico Cerrato, Luis Nombela-Franco, Thomas Pilgrim, Giulio Stefanini

Aims: The number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to increase, but their prognosis remains poorly understood.

Methods and results: Consecutive PCI patients with prior TAVR were compared to patients without prior TAVR between 2008 and 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. An entropy balance approach was implemented to adjust for imbalances in patient and procedural characteristics. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using weighted Cox regression models. Comparing 420 PCI patients with prior TAVR (mean age 80.8 years, 37.1% women) to 1197 without (mean age 70.4 years, 24.6% women), 1-year MACE was higher in the prior TAVR group (8.7 vs. 3.7%; unadjusted HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, prior TAVR remained associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.08-5.16; P = 0.032). This was primarily driven by higher cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, P = 0.032), while the association with myocardial infarction was attenuated post-adjustment and no longer statistically significant.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing PCI after TAVR experience a higher incidence of MACE compared to those undergoing PCI without prior TAVR, underscoring the importance of accurate patient selection before performing PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and history of TAVR.

目的:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者数量预计会增加,但其预后仍不清楚。方法和结果:2008年至2023年间,连续PCI患者与既往TAVR患者进行比较。Kaplan-Meier方法用于估计1年内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率,MACE定义为心血管死亡或心肌梗死的复合。采用熵平衡方法来调整患者和程序特征的不平衡。校正风险比(hr)采用加权Cox回归模型估计。将420例有TAVR的PCI患者(平均年龄80.8岁,女性37.1%)与1197例无TAVR的患者(平均年龄70.4岁,女性24.6%)进行比较,有TAVR组1年MACE较高(8.7比3.7%;未调整HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; P < 0.001)。在调整临床和手术特征后,既往TAVR仍与MACE风险增加相关(调整后危险度2.36,95% CI 1.08-5.16; P = 0.032)。这主要是由于较高的心血管死亡率(校正后HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, P = 0.032),而调整后与心肌梗死的关联减弱,不再具有统计学意义。结论:与没有TAVR的患者相比,TAVR后行PCI的患者MACE发生率更高,强调了对有TAVR病史的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者在行PCI前准确选择患者的重要性。
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Carlo A Pivato, Ottavia Cozzi, Nicole Fontana, Francesca Ieva, Gianluigi Condorelli, Cosmo Godino, Bernhard Reimers, Masaaki Nakase, Karsten Hug, Tobias Rheude, Antonio J Munoz-Garcia, Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz, Alfonso Ielasi, Marco Barbanti, Luigi Biasco, Darren Mylotte, Massimo Leoncini, Jose M de la Torre Hernandez, Giorgio Quadri, Ferdinando Varbella, Angelo Anzuini, Diego Lopez, Philippe Garot, Jorn Brouwer, Antonio Mangieri, Damiano Regazzoli, Luca Testa, Jorge Sanz Sanchez, Daijiro Tomii, Alaide Chieffo, Michael Joner, Gennaro Sardella, Enrico Cerrato, Luis Nombela-Franco, Thomas Pilgrim, Giulio Stefanini","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The number of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is expected to increase, but their prognosis remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive PCI patients with prior TAVR were compared to patients without prior TAVR between 2008 and 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. An entropy balance approach was implemented to adjust for imbalances in patient and procedural characteristics. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using weighted Cox regression models. Comparing 420 PCI patients with prior TAVR (mean age 80.8 years, 37.1% women) to 1197 without (mean age 70.4 years, 24.6% women), 1-year MACE was higher in the prior TAVR group (8.7 vs. 3.7%; unadjusted HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.49-3.69; <i>P</i> < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, prior TAVR remained associated with an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.08-5.16; <i>P</i> = 0.032). This was primarily driven by higher cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.10-8.79, <i>P</i> = 0.032), while the association with myocardial infarction was attenuated post-adjustment and no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing PCI after TAVR experience a higher incidence of MACE compared to those undergoing PCI without prior TAVR, underscoring the importance of accurate patient selection before performing PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and history of TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448705/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tirzepatide compared with semaglutide and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk reduction in obesity: post-hoc analysis of the SURMOUNT-5 trial. 替西帕肽与西马鲁肽比较,肥胖症患者10年心血管疾病风险降低:SURMOUNT-5试验的事后分析
Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117
Mamas A Mamas, Harold Bays, Runjia Li, Navneet Upadhyay, Tanya Irani, Cagri Senyucel, Julia P Dunn, Hong Liu-Seifert

Aims: Approximately two-thirds of obesity-related mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this analysis is to examine predicted CVD risk reduction following weight loss in persons with obesity for primary prevention between tirzepatide and semaglutide, and projected CVD events that could be potentially prevented in the USA.

Methods and results: SURMOUNT-5 was a Phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial conducted in participants with obesity and without Type-2 diabetes, comparing tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) with semaglutide (1.7 or 2.4 mg) and administered via weekly subcutaneous injection. Predicted 10-year CVD risks were compared between treatments at baseline and up to 72 weeks post-treatment among participants without prior CVD. The impact of cardiovascular risk reduction was estimated as the projected preventable CVD events over 10 years for tirzepatide and semaglutide in the USA. The average predicted 10-year CVD risk score before treatment was 9.3%. Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk compared with semaglutide (absolute reduction from baseline of 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). Translating risk reduction to the US population who met treatment eligibility criteria and without prior CVD (∼85 million), an estimated 2 million CVD events could be potentially prevented over 10 years after 72 weeks of tirzepatide treatment, vs. 1.15 million with semaglutide.

Conclusion: In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. This post hoc analysis suggests tirzepatide treatment may provide greater benefit in primary prevention of CVD than semaglutide in people with obesity and overweight.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05822830.

目的:大约三分之二的肥胖相关死亡可归因于心血管疾病(CVD)。本分析的目的是检查肥胖患者体重减轻后,替西帕肽和西马鲁肽一级预防的预测CVD风险降低,以及预测在美国可能预防的CVD事件。方法和结果:SURMOUNT-5是一项3b期、开放标签、随机试验,在肥胖且无2型糖尿病的参与者中进行,比较替西帕肽(10或15 mg)和西马鲁肽(1.7或2.4 mg),并通过每周皮下注射给药。预测的10年CVD风险在基线治疗和治疗后72周无CVD的参与者之间进行比较。在美国,通过替西帕肽和西马鲁肽在10年内预测的可预防的CVD事件来评估心血管风险降低的影响。治疗前平均预测10年心血管疾病风险评分为9.3%。与西马鲁肽相比,替西帕肽治疗可显著降低10年CVD风险(相对基线的绝对降低率分别为2.4%和1.4%,P < 0.001)。将风险降低转化为符合治疗资格标准且无CVD的美国人群(约8500万),在替西帕肽治疗72周后的10年内,估计有200万CVD事件可能被预防,而西马鲁肽治疗为115万。结论:在SURMOUNT-5中,与西马鲁肽相比,替西帕肽治疗与更大的10年CVD预测风险降低相关。这项事后分析表明,在肥胖和超重人群中,替西帕肽治疗在心血管疾病一级预防方面可能比西马鲁肽提供更大的益处。注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05822830。
{"title":"Tirzepatide compared with semaglutide and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk reduction in obesity: <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of the SURMOUNT-5 trial.","authors":"Mamas A Mamas, Harold Bays, Runjia Li, Navneet Upadhyay, Tanya Irani, Cagri Senyucel, Julia P Dunn, Hong Liu-Seifert","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Approximately two-thirds of obesity-related mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this analysis is to examine predicted CVD risk reduction following weight loss in persons with obesity for primary prevention between tirzepatide and semaglutide, and projected CVD events that could be potentially prevented in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>SURMOUNT-5 was a Phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial conducted in participants with obesity and without Type-2 diabetes, comparing tirzepatide (10 or 15 mg) with semaglutide (1.7 or 2.4 mg) and administered via weekly subcutaneous injection. Predicted 10-year CVD risks were compared between treatments at baseline and up to 72 weeks post-treatment among participants without prior CVD. The impact of cardiovascular risk reduction was estimated as the projected preventable CVD events over 10 years for tirzepatide and semaglutide in the USA. The average predicted 10-year CVD risk score before treatment was 9.3%. Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with significantly greater reduction in predicted 10-year CVD risk compared with semaglutide (absolute reduction from baseline of 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Translating risk reduction to the US population who met treatment eligibility criteria and without prior CVD (∼85 million), an estimated 2 million CVD events could be potentially prevented over 10 years after 72 weeks of tirzepatide treatment, vs. 1.15 million with semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In SURMOUNT-5, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater predicted 10-year CVD risk reduction compared with semaglutide. This <i>post hoc</i> analysis suggests tirzepatide treatment may provide greater benefit in primary prevention of CVD than semaglutide in people with obesity and overweight.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05822830.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448458/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic significance of abdominal aortic calcification scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans for mortality in cancer survivors: NHANES-based cohort study (2013-2019). 双能x线吸收仪扫描腹主动脉钙化评分对癌症幸存者死亡率的预后意义:基于nhanes的队列研究(2013-2019)。
Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf116
Mustafa Al-Jarshawi, Glen P Martin, Andrew Cole, Miguel Nobre Menezes, Richard K Cheng, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Eric H Yang, Mamas A Mamas

Aims: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the association of AAC with all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors.

Methods and results: Using 7 years of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013-2019), we analysed a nationally representative cohort of US cancer survivors. AAC burden was quantified using the Kauppila AAC-24 scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between AAC and all-cause mortality, while Fine and Gray models assessed associations between AAC and CV mortality, accounting for non-CV mortality as a competing risk. A total of 23 126 424 cancer survivors (aged ≥40 years) were analysed, recording 4 199 131 (114 unweighted) all-cause deaths and 1 160 618 (34 unweighted) CV deaths over a 69-month median follow-up. AAC was present in 46%, with 19.5% of the cohort showing severe AAC (AAC-24 > 6). Each one-unit increase in AAC-24 score was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality and CV mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval of 1.04 (1.00-1.09) and subdistribution hazard ratio 1.07 (1.02-1.12); P = 0.047 and P = 0.002, respectively] after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, traditional CV risk factors, baseline comorbidities, and cancer-specific characteristics.

Conclusion: AAC detected on DXA scans is independently associated with increased all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors aged 40 years and older. DXA-based AAC assessment may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cardio-oncology.

目的:腹主动脉钙化(AAC)是与一般人群不良心血管(CV)结局相关的系统性动脉粥样硬化的标志。本研究旨在评估AAC与癌症幸存者全因死亡率和CV死亡率的关系。方法和结果:使用国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES, 2013-2019) 7年的数据,我们分析了一个具有全国代表性的美国癌症幸存者队列。采用双能x线吸收仪(DXA)扫描的Kauppila AAC-24评分来量化AAC负担。Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox模型用于评估AAC与全因死亡率之间的关系,Fine和Gray模型评估AAC与CV死亡率之间的关系,将非CV死亡率作为竞争风险考虑在内。在69个月的中位随访期间,共分析了23 126 424名癌症幸存者(年龄≥40岁),记录了4 199 131例(114例未加权)全因死亡和1 160 618例(34例未加权)CV死亡。46%的患者存在AAC,其中19.5%的患者表现为严重AAC (AAC-24 bb6)。AAC-24评分每增加一个单位,全因死亡率和CV死亡率的风险就会增加[校正风险比,95%置信区间为1.04(1.00-1.09),亚分布风险比为1.07 (1.02-1.12);(P = 0.047和P = 0.002),在调整了人口统计学、社会经济、传统心血管危险因素、基线合并症和癌症特异性特征后。结论:DXA扫描检测到的AAC与40岁及以上癌症幸存者的全因死亡率和CV死亡率增加独立相关。基于dxa的AAC评估可作为心脏肿瘤学风险分层的有价值的工具。
{"title":"Prognostic significance of abdominal aortic calcification scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans for mortality in cancer survivors: NHANES-based cohort study (2013-2019).","authors":"Mustafa Al-Jarshawi, Glen P Martin, Andrew Cole, Miguel Nobre Menezes, Richard K Cheng, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Eric H Yang, Mamas A Mamas","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf116","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the association of AAC with all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using 7 years of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013-2019), we analysed a nationally representative cohort of US cancer survivors. AAC burden was quantified using the Kauppila AAC-24 scores on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox models were used to assess the associations between AAC and all-cause mortality, while Fine and Gray models assessed associations between AAC and CV mortality, accounting for non-CV mortality as a competing risk. A total of 23 126 424 cancer survivors (aged ≥40 years) were analysed, recording 4 199 131 (114 unweighted) all-cause deaths and 1 160 618 (34 unweighted) CV deaths over a 69-month median follow-up. AAC was present in 46%, with 19.5% of the cohort showing severe AAC (AAC-24 > 6). Each one-unit increase in AAC-24 score was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality and CV mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval of 1.04 (1.00-1.09) and subdistribution hazard ratio 1.07 (1.02-1.12); <i>P</i> = 0.047 and <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively] after adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, traditional CV risk factors, baseline comorbidities, and cancer-specific characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAC detected on DXA scans is independently associated with increased all-cause and CV mortality in cancer survivors aged 40 years and older. DXA-based AAC assessment may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cardio-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492483/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145234847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. 经导管vs手术主动脉瓣置换术治疗双尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄。
Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110
Joseph Kassab, Parth Desai, Neil Keshvani, Katy Lonergan, Amit Goyal, Ambarish Pandey, Saket Girotra, Dharam J Kumbhani

Aims: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis were excluded from major TAVR trials, and data comparing TAVR and SAVR in this population remain limited. To compare real-world, risk-adjusted outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with BAV stenosis.

Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX research network database. Adults (≥18 years) with echocardiographically confirmed BAV stenosis undergoing isolated TAVR or SAVR from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients with prior cardiac procedures or concomitant cardiac interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was used to balance covariates. Primary outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality, stroke, and valve re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included new pacemaker implantation (PPM), 30-day AKI, and bleeding. 5547 patients (TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103) were included. In unadjusted analysis, TAVR patients were sicker and older at baseline and had a higher risk of death and/or stroke compared with those who underwent SAVR (10.9% vs. 5.37%, P < 0.0001). Following PSM, 663 matched pairs were analyzed with all covariates balanced. At 2 years, all-cause mortality (TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, P = 0.71) and stroke (TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, P = 0.058) were similar between the two groups. Re-intervention rates were low and comparable. TAVR was associated with higher PPM rates but lower AKI and bleeding rates.

Conclusion: In propensity-matched BAV patients, TAVR and SAVR demonstrated comparable 2-year mortality, stroke, and re-intervention rates. These findings support TAVR as a viable option in appropriately selected BAV patients, warranting further prospective validation.

目的:双尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)狭窄的患者被排除在主要的TAVR试验之外,比较该人群TAVR和SAVR的数据仍然有限。比较BAV狭窄患者TAVR与SAVR在现实世界中的风险调整结果。方法和结果:我们使用TriNetX研究网络数据库进行回顾性队列分析。纳入2012年至2022年超声心动图证实BAV狭窄的成人(≥18岁)进行孤立性TAVR或SAVR。既往有心脏手术或合并心脏干预的患者被排除在外。倾向得分匹配(PSM)(1:1)用于平衡协变量。主要结局为2年全因死亡率、卒中和瓣膜再干预。次要结果包括新的起搏器植入(PPM)、30天AKI和出血。纳入5547例患者(TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103)。在未经调整的分析中,与接受SAVR的患者相比,TAVR患者在基线时病情更重,年龄更大,死亡和/或卒中的风险更高(10.9% vs. 5.37%, P < 0.0001)。采用PSM对663对配对进行分析,所有协变量平衡。2年时,两组的全因死亡率(TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, P = 0.71)和卒中(TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, P = 0.058)相似。再干预率低且具有可比性。TAVR与较高的PPM率相关,但与较低的AKI和出血率相关。结论:在倾向匹配的BAV患者中,TAVR和SAVR显示出相当的2年死亡率、卒中和再干预率。这些发现支持TAVR作为适当选择的BAV患者的可行选择,需要进一步的前瞻性验证。
{"title":"Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.","authors":"Joseph Kassab, Parth Desai, Neil Keshvani, Katy Lonergan, Amit Goyal, Ambarish Pandey, Saket Girotra, Dharam J Kumbhani","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis were excluded from major TAVR trials, and data comparing TAVR and SAVR in this population remain limited. To compare real-world, risk-adjusted outcomes of TAVR vs. SAVR in patients with BAV stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX research network database. Adults (≥18 years) with echocardiographically confirmed BAV stenosis undergoing isolated TAVR or SAVR from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients with prior cardiac procedures or concomitant cardiac interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) was used to balance covariates. Primary outcomes were 2-year all-cause mortality, stroke, and valve re-intervention. Secondary outcomes included new pacemaker implantation (PPM), 30-day AKI, and bleeding. 5547 patients (TAVR: 1444; SAVR: 4103) were included. In unadjusted analysis, TAVR patients were sicker and older at baseline and had a higher risk of death and/or stroke compared with those who underwent SAVR (10.9% vs. 5.37%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Following PSM, 663 matched pairs were analyzed with all covariates balanced. At 2 years, all-cause mortality (TAVR: 4.8% vs. SAVR: 5.3%; OR: 0.91, <i>P</i> = 0.71) and stroke (TAVR: 7.3% vs. SAVR: 4.5%; OR: 1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.058) were similar between the two groups. Re-intervention rates were low and comparable. TAVR was associated with higher PPM rates but lower AKI and bleeding rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In propensity-matched BAV patients, TAVR and SAVR demonstrated comparable 2-year mortality, stroke, and re-intervention rates. These findings support TAVR as a viable option in appropriately selected BAV patients, warranting further prospective validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395246/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage predicts cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients: a real-world data analysis of a nationwide epidemiological dataset. 心血管-肾脏代谢综合征阶段预测癌症患者心血管结局:对全国流行病学数据集的真实数据分析
Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf115
Toshiyuki Ko, Yuta Suzuki, Hidehiro Kaneko, Akira Okada, Takahiro Jimba, Tatsuhiko Azegami, Atsushi Mizuno, Kentaro Ejiri, Katsuhito Fujiu, Norifumi Takeda, Hiroyuki Morita, Kaori Hayashi, Koichi Node, Hideo Yasunaga, Masaomi Nangaku, Norihiko Takeda

Aims: Cancer survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to shared risk factors and treatment-related toxicity. The recently proposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome framework provides a novel approach for cardiometabolic risk stratification, but its prognostic value in cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between CKM stages and cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients using a large-scale nationwide dataset.

Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 76 111 cancer patients without prior CVD from the DeSC database (2014-2023). Participants were classified into CKM stages (0-3) at baseline, with Stage 4 defined as the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of progression to Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, advancing CKM stages were associated with a graded increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Compared to Stage 0-1 (reference), adjusted hazard ratios for Stage 4 were 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.33) for Stage 2 and 1.47 (1.36-1.60) for Stage 3. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent associations across different groups stratified by age, sex, chemotherapy history, and cancer types. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses using alternative risk prediction models or expanded CVD definitions yielded similar results.

Conclusion: The CKM staging system effectively stratifies cardiovascular risk in cancer patients, with higher stages predicting significantly worse outcomes. These findings advocate for integrating CKM assessment into onco-cardiologic practice to guide early intervention and improve patient outcomes.

目的:由于共同的危险因素和治疗相关的毒性,癌症幸存者心血管风险增加。最近提出的心血管-肾-代谢(CKM)综合征框架为心脏代谢风险分层提供了一种新的方法,但其在癌症患者中的预后价值尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用大规模的全国数据集评估癌症患者CKM分期与心血管结局之间的关系。方法和结果:我们对来自DeSC数据库(2014-2023)的76111例既往无心血管疾病的癌症患者进行了回顾性队列研究。参与者在基线时被分为CKM分期(0-3),第4期定义为心肌梗死、心力衰竭、心房颤动、中风或外周动脉疾病的复合结局。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估进展到第4期的风险。在中位随访2.6年期间,CKM分期的进展与心血管疾病(CVD)风险的分级增加相关。与0-1阶段(参考)相比,第4阶段2的调整风险比为1.23(95%可信区间:1.13-1.33),第3阶段为1.47(1.36-1.60)。敏感性分析证实了按年龄、性别、化疗史和癌症类型分层的不同组之间的一致关联。此外,使用替代风险预测模型或扩展CVD定义的敏感性分析也得出了类似的结果。结论:CKM分期系统有效地对癌症患者的心血管风险进行分层,分期越高,预后越差。这些发现提倡将CKM评估纳入肿瘤-心脏病学实践,以指导早期干预和改善患者预后。
{"title":"Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stage predicts cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients: a real-world data analysis of a nationwide epidemiological dataset.","authors":"Toshiyuki Ko, Yuta Suzuki, Hidehiro Kaneko, Akira Okada, Takahiro Jimba, Tatsuhiko Azegami, Atsushi Mizuno, Kentaro Ejiri, Katsuhito Fujiu, Norifumi Takeda, Hiroyuki Morita, Kaori Hayashi, Koichi Node, Hideo Yasunaga, Masaomi Nangaku, Norihiko Takeda","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cancer survivors are at increased cardiovascular risk due to shared risk factors and treatment-related toxicity. The recently proposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome framework provides a novel approach for cardiometabolic risk stratification, but its prognostic value in cancer patients remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between CKM stages and cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients using a large-scale nationwide dataset.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 76 111 cancer patients without prior CVD from the DeSC database (2014-2023). Participants were classified into CKM stages (0-3) at baseline, with Stage 4 defined as the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of progression to Stage 4. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, advancing CKM stages were associated with a graded increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Compared to Stage 0-1 (reference), adjusted hazard ratios for Stage 4 were 1.23 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.33) for Stage 2 and 1.47 (1.36-1.60) for Stage 3. Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent associations across different groups stratified by age, sex, chemotherapy history, and cancer types. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses using alternative risk prediction models or expanded CVD definitions yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CKM staging system effectively stratifies cardiovascular risk in cancer patients, with higher stages predicting significantly worse outcomes. These findings advocate for integrating CKM assessment into onco-cardiologic practice to guide early intervention and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448714/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic impact of the acute reactiveness to intravenous administration of tolvaptan sodium phosphate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. 静脉注射托伐坦磷酸钠对急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者预后的影响。
Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf108
Shohei Ouchi, Hiroshi Iwata, Soshi Moriya, Ryo Naito, Norihito Takahashi, Takatoshi Kasai, Tohru Minamino

Aims: Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate (IV-tolvaptan) is a novel aquaretic agent for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study evaluated its short-term effects and prognostic implications in clinical practice.

Methods and results: In this retrospective cohort of 169 consecutive ADHF patients receiving IV-tolvaptan for the first time (mean age 76.0 ± 12.7 years; 50.9% female), we measured hourly urine output over 6 h and assessed clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and 24 h post-dose. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. At 24 h, IV-tolvaptan significantly reduced body weight (mean difference: -1.1 ± 2.3 kg, P < 0.001), NT-proBNP (median change: -1704 pg/mL; P < 0.001), and urinary osmolality (mean change: -71.4 ± 169.4 mOsm/kg; P = 0.015), while raising serum sodium (mean change: 1.7 ± 2.9 mEq/L; P < 0.001). Six-hour urine output correlated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = 0.34; P < 0.001), urinary osmolality (r = 0.28; P = 0.003), and the change in serum sodium (r = 0.21; P = 0.005). In multivariable logistic regression, renal impairment (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) [odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.4; P < 0.001] and higher furosemide doses (>20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; P = 0.01) predicted reduced responsiveness, whereas first hospitalization (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; P = 0.04) and high urinary osmolality (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; P = 0.05) predicted favourable response. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a lower incidence of the primary endpoint in patients achieving ≥ 1000 mL urine output (log-rank P = 0.032).

Conclusion: Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate enhances decongestion and short-term outcomes in ADHF without worsening renal function. Early diuretic responsiveness is a robust prognostic marker.

目的:静脉注射托伐普坦磷酸钠(iv -托伐普坦)是一种治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的新型药物。本研究在临床实践中评估了其短期效果和预后意义。方法和结果:在169例首次接受iv -托伐坦治疗的ADHF患者(平均年龄76.0±12.7岁,50.9%为女性)的回顾性队列中,我们测量了6小时内的每小时尿量,并评估了基线和给药后24小时的临床和生化参数。主要终点是全因死亡率和心力衰竭再住院的综合指标。24 h时,IV-tolvaptan显著降低体重(平均差值:-1.1±2.3 kg, P < 0.001)、NT-proBNP(变化中值:-1704 pg/mL, P < 0.001)和尿渗透压(变化中值:-71.4±169.4 mOsm/kg, P = 0.015),同时提高血清钠(变化中值:1.7±2.9 mEq/L, P < 0.001)。6小时尿量与基线估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR) (r = 0.34; P < 0.001)、尿渗透压(r = 0.28; P = 0.003)和血清钠的变化(r = 0.21; P = 0.005)相关。在多变量logistic回归中,肾损害(eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2)[优势比(OR) 0.2;95%置信区间(CI) 0.1 ~ 0.4;P < 0.001]和较高呋塞米剂量(bbb20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; P = 0.01)预测反应性降低,而首次住院(OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; P = 0.04)和高尿渗透压(OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; P = 0.05)预测反应良好。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,尿量≥1000 mL的患者主要终点发生率较低(log-rank P = 0.032)。结论:静脉注射托伐普坦磷酸钠可改善ADHF患者的去充血和短期预后,且不会使肾功能恶化。早期利尿剂反应是一个强有力的预后指标。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of the acute reactiveness to intravenous administration of tolvaptan sodium phosphate in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.","authors":"Shohei Ouchi, Hiroshi Iwata, Soshi Moriya, Ryo Naito, Norihito Takahashi, Takatoshi Kasai, Tohru Minamino","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf108","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate (IV-tolvaptan) is a novel aquaretic agent for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). This study evaluated its short-term effects and prognostic implications in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In this retrospective cohort of 169 consecutive ADHF patients receiving IV-tolvaptan for the first time (mean age 76.0 ± 12.7 years; 50.9% female), we measured hourly urine output over 6 h and assessed clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and 24 h post-dose. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. At 24 h, IV-tolvaptan significantly reduced body weight (mean difference: -1.1 ± 2.3 kg, <i>P</i> < 0.001), NT-proBNP (median change: -1704 pg/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and urinary osmolality (mean change: -71.4 ± 169.4 mOsm/kg; <i>P</i> = 0.015), while raising serum sodium (mean change: 1.7 ± 2.9 mEq/L; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Six-hour urine output correlated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<i>r</i> = 0.34; <i>P</i> < 0.001), urinary osmolality (<i>r</i> = 0.28; <i>P</i> = 0.003), and the change in serum sodium (<i>r</i> = 0.21; <i>P</i> = 0.005). In multivariable logistic regression, renal impairment (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>) [odds ratio (OR) 0.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.4; <i>P</i> < 0.001] and higher furosemide doses (>20 mg) (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.6; <i>P</i> = 0.01) predicted reduced responsiveness, whereas first hospitalization (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.5; <i>P</i> = 0.04) and high urinary osmolality (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.4; <i>P</i> = 0.05) predicted favourable response. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a lower incidence of the primary endpoint in patients achieving ≥ 1000 mL urine output (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravenous tolvaptan sodium phosphate enhances decongestion and short-term outcomes in ADHF without worsening renal function. Early diuretic responsiveness is a robust prognostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415332/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Echocardiographic risk stratification in light chain and transthyretin amyloidosis: a meta-analysis. 轻链和转甲状腺蛋白淀粉样变性的超声心动图危险分层:荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf078
David Koeckerling, Rohin K Reddy, Christian Eichhorn, Volker Braun, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Fabian Aus dem Siepen, Benjamin Meder, Norbert Frey, Derliz Mereles

Aims: The role of echocardiography in amyloidosis prognostication remains undefined in international guidelines. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate associations between echocardiography-derived measurements and clinical outcomes in light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis.

Methods and results: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched through July 2024 for studies reporting associations between echocardiographic variables [left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), interventricular septum diameter (IVSd), LV mass index (LVMi) and E/e' ratios] and adverse events in AL or ATTR amyloidosis. Prespecified demographic items and clinical outcomes were extracted by two blinded, independent reviewers. The prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Random-effect models were applied to pool hazard ratios (HR). 94 studies comprising 16158 patients (n = 4788 AL, n = 8241 ATTR, n = 3129 mixed aetiologies) were included. Median follow-up was 22.3 (IQR, 16.9-31.4) months. Higher all-cause mortality risk (HR, 1.10: 95%CI, 1.08-1.12; P < 0.001) was observed per 1% LV-GLS decrement, consistent across AL and ATTR subgroups. Lower all-cause mortality risk was seen with increasing LVEF (per 1%) and TAPSE (per 1 mm) in the overall population (HRLVEF, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.98-0.98; P < 0.001; and HRTAPSE, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.93-0.95; P < 0.001) and in AL and ATTR subgroups. Higher E/e' ratios (per 1 unit) were associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.02-1.03; P < 0.001), consistent across AL and ATTR subtypes. No reliable associations between structural parameters (IVSd, LVMi) and clinical outcomes were found.

Conclusion: Echocardiographic measures of biventricular deformation, systolic and diastolic function, were consistently associated with mortality in amyloidosis, while structural parameters were not. Echocardiography may have an important role in the initial risk stratification of cardiac amyloidosis.

目的:超声心动图在淀粉样变预后中的作用在国际指南中仍未明确。本荟萃分析旨在评估轻链(AL)和转甲状腺素(ATTR)淀粉样变的超声心动图衍生测量与临床结果之间的关系。方法和结果:MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar系统检索了截至2024年7月的超声心动图变量[左室总纵应变(LV- gls)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、三尖瓣环平面收缩偏移(TAPSE)、室间隔直径(IVSd)、左室质量指数(LVMi)和E/ E比值]与AL或ATTR淀粉样变性不良事件之间的关联研究。预先指定的人口学项目和临床结果由两位盲法独立评论者提取。预先设定的主要结局是全因死亡率。随机效应模型应用于池风险比(HR)。纳入94项研究,包括16158例患者(n = 4788例AL, n = 8241例atr, n = 3129例混合病因)。中位随访时间为22.3个月(IQR, 16.9-31.4)。LV-GLS每降低1%,全因死亡风险更高(HR, 1.10: 95%CI, 1.08-1.12; P < 0.001),这在AL和ATTR亚组中是一致的。在总体人群(HRLVEF, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.98-0.98; P < 0.001; HRTAPSE, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.93-0.95; P < 0.001)和AL和ATTR亚组中,随着LVEF(每1%)和TAPSE(每1 mm)的增加,全因死亡风险降低。较高的E/ E '比(每1单位)与全因死亡率相关(HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.02-1.03; P < 0.001),在AL和ATTR亚型中是一致的。结构参数(IVSd, LVMi)与临床结果之间没有可靠的关联。结论:超声心动图测量的双心室变形、收缩和舒张功能与淀粉样变性患者的死亡率一致相关,而结构参数与之无关。超声心动图可能在心脏淀粉样变的初始危险分层中起重要作用。
{"title":"Echocardiographic risk stratification in light chain and transthyretin amyloidosis: a meta-analysis.","authors":"David Koeckerling, Rohin K Reddy, Christian Eichhorn, Volker Braun, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Fabian Aus dem Siepen, Benjamin Meder, Norbert Frey, Derliz Mereles","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf078","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The role of echocardiography in amyloidosis prognostication remains undefined in international guidelines. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate associations between echocardiography-derived measurements and clinical outcomes in light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically searched through July 2024 for studies reporting associations between echocardiographic variables [left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), interventricular septum diameter (IVSd), LV mass index (LVMi) and <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>' ratios] and adverse events in AL or ATTR amyloidosis. Prespecified demographic items and clinical outcomes were extracted by two blinded, independent reviewers. The prespecified primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Random-effect models were applied to pool hazard ratios (HR). 94 studies comprising 16158 patients (<i>n</i> = 4788 AL, <i>n</i> = 8241 ATTR, <i>n</i> = 3129 mixed aetiologies) were included. Median follow-up was 22.3 (IQR, 16.9-31.4) months. Higher all-cause mortality risk (HR, 1.10: 95%CI, 1.08-1.12; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was observed per 1% LV-GLS decrement, consistent across AL and ATTR subgroups. Lower all-cause mortality risk was seen with increasing LVEF (per 1%) and TAPSE (per 1 mm) in the overall population (HR<sub>LVEF</sub>, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.98-0.98; <i>P</i> < 0.001; and HR<sub>TAPSE</sub>, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.93-0.95; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and in AL and ATTR subgroups. Higher <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>' ratios (per 1 unit) were associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.02-1.03; <i>P</i> < 0.001), consistent across AL and ATTR subtypes. No reliable associations between structural parameters (IVSd, LVMi) and clinical outcomes were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Echocardiographic measures of biventricular deformation, systolic and diastolic function, were consistently associated with mortality in amyloidosis, while structural parameters were not. Echocardiography may have an important role in the initial risk stratification of cardiac amyloidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aortic valve-sparing root replacement and composite root replacement: a Danish multicentre nationwide study. 保留主动脉瓣根置换术和复合根置换术:丹麦多中心全国性研究。
Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf112
Emil Johannes Ravn, Lytfi Krasniqi, Viktor Poulsen, Poul Erik Mortensen, Bo Juel Kjeldsen, Jens Lund, Kristian Øvrehus, Oke Gerke, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Morten Holdgaard Smerup, Ivy Susanne Modrau, Torsten Bloch Rasmussen, Katrine M Müllertz, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi Sanchez Dahl, Lars Peter Schødt Riber

Aims: Aortic valve-sparing root replacement is recommended over composite root replacement for aortic root aneurysms, especially in younger patients, but long-term outcomes in low-volume nationwide settings remain unclear. The objectives are to compare long-term survival, stroke, and reoperation rates between the two procedures in a low-volume national setting.

Methods and results: Patients were identified from the Western Danish Heart Registry and the Danish Heart Registry. Cases were validated by review of operative descriptions. The primary outcome was long-term survival from all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included stroke, reoperation, recurrent aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis. Groups were balanced using propensity score matching. Echocardiographic data were provided for the matched cohort. We identified 760 patients treated with composite root replacement and 179 patients with aortic valve-sparing root replacement between January 2010 and April 2022. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years. Composite root replacement patients were younger [50.7 years (SD 14.1) vs. 55.2 (SD 13.5), P < 0.001], but more comorbid with a median EuroSCOREII of 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-11.7] vs. 3.4 (IQR: 2.6-5.0) (P < 0.001). After matching 157 patients per group, aortic valve-sparing root replacement showed improved 10-year survival [91.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 82.3-95.8 vs. 80.4%, 95% CI 70.0-87.5, log-rank P = 0.026], with lower 10-year stroke risk (4.9%, 95% CI 1.8-13.0 vs. 18.9%, 95% CI 11.7-29.9, log-rank P = 0.007). Risk of reoperation was nonsignificant (log-rank P = 0.12), which was consistent in the crude population when accounting for competing risk of death (log-rank P = 0.09).

Conclusion: In this nationwide study, aortic valve-sparing root replacement was associated with better long-term survival and lower stroke risk, supporting its role as a durable surgical option for selected patients.

目的:保留主动脉瓣的根置换术比复合根置换术更适用于主动脉根动脉瘤的治疗,尤其是在年轻患者中,但在全国范围内小容量环境下的长期结果尚不清楚。目的是比较两种手术在低容量国家环境下的长期生存率、卒中和再手术率。方法和结果:从西丹麦心脏登记处和丹麦心脏登记处确定患者。病例通过检查手术描述进行验证。主要终点是全因死亡率的长期生存;次要结局包括卒中、再手术、主动脉返流复发和主动脉狭窄。使用倾向得分匹配来平衡各组。提供匹配队列的超声心动图数据。在2010年1月至2022年4月期间,我们发现760例患者接受了复合根置换术,179例患者接受了保留主动脉瓣的根置换术。平均随访时间为6.5年。复合牙根置换患者更年轻[50.7岁(SD 14.1)对55.2岁(SD 13.5), P < 0.001],但EuroSCOREII中位数为5.5[四分位间距(IQR): 3.3-11.7]对3.4 (IQR: 2.6-5.0) (P < 0.001)更合并症。每组匹配157例患者后,保留主动脉瓣根置换术显示10年生存率提高[91.2%,95%可信区间(CI) 82.3-95.8 vs. 80.4%, 95% CI 70.0-87.5, log-rank P = 0.026], 10年卒中风险降低(4.9%,95% CI 1.8-13.0 vs. 18.9%, 95% CI 11.7-29.9, log-rank P = 0.007)。再手术风险不显著(log-rank P = 0.12),当考虑竞争死亡风险时,这在粗人群中是一致的(log-rank P = 0.09)。结论:在这项全国性的研究中,保留主动脉瓣的根置换术与更好的长期生存和更低的卒中风险相关,支持其作为选定患者的持久手术选择的作用。
{"title":"Aortic valve-sparing root replacement and composite root replacement: a Danish multicentre nationwide study.","authors":"Emil Johannes Ravn, Lytfi Krasniqi, Viktor Poulsen, Poul Erik Mortensen, Bo Juel Kjeldsen, Jens Lund, Kristian Øvrehus, Oke Gerke, Rasmus Carter-Storch, Morten Holdgaard Smerup, Ivy Susanne Modrau, Torsten Bloch Rasmussen, Katrine M Müllertz, Marie-Annick Clavel, Jordi Sanchez Dahl, Lars Peter Schødt Riber","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf112","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Aortic valve-sparing root replacement is recommended over composite root replacement for aortic root aneurysms, especially in younger patients, but long-term outcomes in low-volume nationwide settings remain unclear. The objectives are to compare long-term survival, stroke, and reoperation rates between the two procedures in a low-volume national setting.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients were identified from the Western Danish Heart Registry and the Danish Heart Registry. Cases were validated by review of operative descriptions. The primary outcome was long-term survival from all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included stroke, reoperation, recurrent aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis. Groups were balanced using propensity score matching. Echocardiographic data were provided for the matched cohort. We identified 760 patients treated with composite root replacement and 179 patients with aortic valve-sparing root replacement between January 2010 and April 2022. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years. Composite root replacement patients were younger [50.7 years (SD 14.1) vs. 55.2 (SD 13.5), <i>P</i> < 0.001], but more comorbid with a median EuroSCOREII of 5.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-11.7] vs. 3.4 (IQR: 2.6-5.0) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). After matching 157 patients per group, aortic valve-sparing root replacement showed improved 10-year survival [91.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 82.3-95.8 vs. 80.4%, 95% CI 70.0-87.5, log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.026], with lower 10-year stroke risk (4.9%, 95% CI 1.8-13.0 vs. 18.9%, 95% CI 11.7-29.9, log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.007). Risk of reoperation was nonsignificant (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.12), which was consistent in the crude population when accounting for competing risk of death (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this nationwide study, aortic valve-sparing root replacement was associated with better long-term survival and lower stroke risk, supporting its role as a durable surgical option for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145115641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. 静脉-动脉体外膜氧合治疗心源性休克患者左心室负荷。
Pub Date : 2025-08-21 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf103
Bilaal Yousaf Dar, Gaayen Ravii Sahgal, Tavgah Jafar, Sangwoo R Jung, Mahmood Ahmad, Rui Bebiano Da Providencia E Costa, Iqra Javid, Syed Yousaf Ahmad, Malik Takreem Ahmad, Yusuf Abdirahman Yusuf, Abdulrahman Kashkosh

Aims: Cardiogenic shock remains a significant cause of mortality despite multiple advancements in medical interventions. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides crucial circulatory support but also increases left ventricular (LV) after-load, potentially worsening outcomes. Effective LV unloading strategies can enhance patient survival during VA-ECMO treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of LV unloading strategies, including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella, on outcomes such as mortality and adverse effects in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO.

Methods and results: A systematic search of EMBASE and Medline was conducted from inception up to 20 August 2024. Additional sources included forward citation searches of primary references. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting mortality rates in patients undergoing VA-ECMO with and without LV unloading. Exclusion criteria included case studies, editorials, commentaries, literature reviews, studies without a control group, those not examining LV unloading, studies on non-cardiogenic shock patients, and paediatric populations. From 943 identified studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria after abstract and full text screening by two authors. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines with independent reviewers abstracting data and assessing study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) tool. A random-effects model was used to pool data, accounting for study heterogeneity. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed at three time points: intra-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and mortality at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects such as bleeding, infection, cardiovascular events, limb ischaemia, and renal replacement therapy (RRT). The meta-analysis included 26 studies with a total of 22 625 patients. LV unloading strategies significantly reduced mortality compared to no unloading (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.96). IABP (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.89) was associated with a significant reduction of mortality compared to no unloading. All adverse effects were comparable across groups apart from significantly increased infection rates and need for RRT in Impella patients (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.75, and RR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.00, respectively).

Conclusion: LV unloading strategies associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO. Whilst adverse effects are similar across all strategies, Impella specifically is linked to higher infection rates and need for RRT. These findings could be used to support the use of LV unloading devices in clinical practice and highlight the need for further randomized controlled trials to establish optimal device-options and management protocols.

目的:心源性休克仍然是死亡率的重要原因,尽管在医疗干预方面取得了多项进展。静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)提供了至关重要的循环支持,但也增加了左心室(LV)后负荷,潜在地恶化了预后。有效的左室卸荷策略可提高VA-ECMO治疗期间患者的生存率。我们的目的是评估左室卸载策略,包括主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)和Impella,对VA-ECMO治疗心源性休克患者的死亡率和不良反应等结果的影响。方法与结果:系统检索EMBASE和Medline数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年8月20日。其他来源包括主要参考文献的转发引文搜索。纳入标准是报道有或没有左室卸荷的VA-ECMO患者死亡率的研究。排除标准包括病例研究、社论、评论、文献综述、没有对照组的研究、没有检查左室卸载的研究、非心源性休克患者的研究和儿科人群。经两位作者对摘要和全文筛选,943项研究中有26项符合纳入标准。数据提取遵循PRISMA指南,由独立审稿人提取数据,并使用Cochrane非随机研究偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估研究质量。随机效应模型用于汇集数据,考虑研究异质性。主要结局是全因死亡率,在三个时间点评估:院内死亡率、30天死亡率和最长随访时的死亡率。次要结局包括不良反应,如出血、感染、心血管事件、肢体缺血和肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。荟萃分析包括26项研究,共22 625名患者。左室卸药策略与未卸药相比显著降低死亡率(RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73至0.96)。与未卸载相比,IABP (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69 ~ 0.89)与死亡率显著降低相关。除了Impella患者的感染率和RRT需求显著增加(RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.07至1.75,RR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.37至3.00)外,各组间的所有不良反应均具有可比性。结论:左室卸荷策略与VA-ECMO治疗心源性休克患者死亡率降低相关。虽然所有策略的副作用相似,但Impella特别与较高的感染率和RRT的需求有关。这些发现可以用来支持在临床实践中使用左室卸载装置,并强调需要进一步的随机对照试验来建立最佳的设备选择和管理方案。
{"title":"Left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Bilaal Yousaf Dar, Gaayen Ravii Sahgal, Tavgah Jafar, Sangwoo R Jung, Mahmood Ahmad, Rui Bebiano Da Providencia E Costa, Iqra Javid, Syed Yousaf Ahmad, Malik Takreem Ahmad, Yusuf Abdirahman Yusuf, Abdulrahman Kashkosh","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf103","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiogenic shock remains a significant cause of mortality despite multiple advancements in medical interventions. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) provides crucial circulatory support but also increases left ventricular (LV) after-load, potentially worsening outcomes. Effective LV unloading strategies can enhance patient survival during VA-ECMO treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of LV unloading strategies, including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and Impella, on outcomes such as mortality and adverse effects in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A systematic search of EMBASE and Medline was conducted from inception up to 20 August 2024. Additional sources included forward citation searches of primary references. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting mortality rates in patients undergoing VA-ECMO with and without LV unloading. Exclusion criteria included case studies, editorials, commentaries, literature reviews, studies without a control group, those not examining LV unloading, studies on non-cardiogenic shock patients, and paediatric populations. From 943 identified studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria after abstract and full text screening by two authors. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines with independent reviewers abstracting data and assessing study quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) tool. A random-effects model was used to pool data, accounting for study heterogeneity. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed at three time points: intra-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and mortality at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects such as bleeding, infection, cardiovascular events, limb ischaemia, and renal replacement therapy (RRT). The meta-analysis included 26 studies with a total of 22 625 patients. LV unloading strategies significantly reduced mortality compared to no unloading (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.96). IABP (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.89) was associated with a significant reduction of mortality compared to no unloading. All adverse effects were comparable across groups apart from significantly increased infection rates and need for RRT in Impella patients (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.75, and RR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.00, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LV unloading strategies associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO. Whilst adverse effects are similar across all strategies, Impella specifically is linked to higher infection rates and need for RRT. These findings could be used to support the use of LV unloading devices in clinical practice and highlight the need for further randomized controlled trials to establish optimal device-options and management protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 5","pages":"oeaf103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415181/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European heart journal open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1