Pub Date : 2025-06-28eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf084
Márton Boga, Zoltán Salló, Gábor Orbán, Ferenc Komlósi, Anna Padisák, Patrik Tóth, Péter Perge, Vivien Klaudia Nagy, Edit Tanai, István Osztheimer, Béla Merkely, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi
Aims: We hypothesize that sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients taking anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) after pre-procedural electrical cardioversion (ECV) could predict outcomes after catheter ablation procedures.
Methods and results: 219 persistent AF patients on AADs underwent ECV 1-6 months before ablation. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their response to ECV: patients in whom SR was restored and maintained until the ablation procedure (ECV-SR group), and patients with AF recurrence before the procedure (ECV-AF group). Then, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create study groups (94-94 patients). The efficacy outcomes of the present study were freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia on/off AADs following a single ablation procedure and recurrence of persistent AF. The median follow-up duration was 42 (20-73) months. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 36 months was lower in the ECV-AF group compared to ECV-SR patients (31.4% vs. 51.2%, respectively; crude HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.58-3.70, P < 0.001). The most frequent pattern of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was persistent AF in the ECV-AF group and paroxysmal AF in the ECV-SR group. Freedom from persistent AF at 36 months was 54% and 84.3%, respectively (crude HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.94-7.14, P < 0.001). Differences in the risk of the efficacy outcomes were similar after multi-variable adjustment and in all analysed subgroups, including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only procedures.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the positive response to pre-procedural ECV may be a valuable marker for identifying persistent AF patients in whom a PVI-only strategy is sufficient.
目的:我们假设持续性心房颤动(AF)患者在术前电转复(ECV)后服用抗心律失常药物(AADs)维持窦性心律(SR)可以预测导管消融手术后的预后。方法与结果:219例AADs持续性房颤患者在消融前1 ~ 6个月行ECV治疗。根据患者对ECV的反应将患者分为两组:恢复并维持SR至消融手术的患者(ECV-SR组)和手术前AF复发的患者(ECV-AF组)。然后,采用1:1倾向评分匹配法创建研究组(94-94例)。本研究的疗效结果是在单次消融手术后无房性心动过速和持续性房颤复发。中位随访时间为42(20-73)个月。与ECV-SR患者相比,ECV-AF组在36个月时房性心动过速的自由度较低(分别为31.4%和51.2%;粗HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.58 ~ 3.70, P < 0.001)。房颤复发最常见的类型是ECV-AF组的持续性房颤和ECV-SR组的阵发性房颤。36个月时持续性房颤的发生率分别为54%和84.3%(粗HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.94-7.14, P < 0.001)。在多变量调整后,在所有分析的亚组中,包括仅肺静脉隔离(PVI)手术,疗效结果的风险差异相似。结论:我们的研究结果表明,术前ECV的阳性反应可能是识别持续性房颤患者的一个有价值的标志,在这些患者中,只有pvi策略是足够的。
{"title":"Impact of response to electrical cardioversion before catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Márton Boga, Zoltán Salló, Gábor Orbán, Ferenc Komlósi, Anna Padisák, Patrik Tóth, Péter Perge, Vivien Klaudia Nagy, Edit Tanai, István Osztheimer, Béla Merkely, László Gellér, Nándor Szegedi","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf084","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We hypothesize that sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients taking anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) after pre-procedural electrical cardioversion (ECV) could predict outcomes after catheter ablation procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>219 persistent AF patients on AADs underwent ECV 1-6 months before ablation. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their response to ECV: patients in whom SR was restored and maintained until the ablation procedure (ECV-SR group), and patients with AF recurrence before the procedure (ECV-AF group). Then, 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create study groups (94-94 patients). The efficacy outcomes of the present study were freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia on/off AADs following a single ablation procedure and recurrence of persistent AF. The median follow-up duration was 42 (20-73) months. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 36 months was lower in the ECV-AF group compared to ECV-SR patients (31.4% vs. 51.2%, respectively; crude HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.58-3.70, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The most frequent pattern of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was persistent AF in the ECV-AF group and paroxysmal AF in the ECV-SR group. Freedom from persistent AF at 36 months was 54% and 84.3%, respectively (crude HR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.94-7.14, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Differences in the risk of the efficacy outcomes were similar after multi-variable adjustment and in all analysed subgroups, including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that the positive response to pre-procedural ECV may be a valuable marker for identifying persistent AF patients in whom a PVI-only strategy is sufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264425/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144651649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-28eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf086
Arnaldo Dimagli, Kevin R An, Sigrid Sandner, Polina Mantaj, Aina Hirofuji, C David Mazer, Bjorn Redfors, Feng Qiu, Stephen Fremes, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Thomas Schwann, Robert Habib, Mario Gaudino
Aims: The study aimed to investigate international trends in the adoption of the radial artery (RA) as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting across different national and regional registries.
Methods and results: Data were extracted from four databases: the UK cardiac surgery database, the Ontario provincial administrative database, the Austrian national adult cardiac surgery database, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD). Radial artery use rates were 4.3% in the UK, 23.3% in Ontario, 4.8% in Austria, and 6.4% in the STS ACSD. Significant uptrends in RA use were observed in Ontario (P = 0.001), Austria (P = 0.004), and the STS ACSD (P = 0.02), while a downtrend was noted in the UK (P = 0.015). Endoscopic RA harvesting was increasingly adopted, particularly in Ontario and the STS ACSD.
Conclusion: Global adoption of RA remains variable and generally low with a general uptrend and higher adoption of endoscopic harvesting.
{"title":"International trends in radial artery usage for coronary artery bypass grafting.","authors":"Arnaldo Dimagli, Kevin R An, Sigrid Sandner, Polina Mantaj, Aina Hirofuji, C David Mazer, Bjorn Redfors, Feng Qiu, Stephen Fremes, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Thomas Schwann, Robert Habib, Mario Gaudino","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf086","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to investigate international trends in the adoption of the radial artery (RA) as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting across different national and regional registries.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data were extracted from four databases: the UK cardiac surgery database, the Ontario provincial administrative database, the Austrian national adult cardiac surgery database, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD). Radial artery use rates were 4.3% in the UK, 23.3% in Ontario, 4.8% in Austria, and 6.4% in the STS ACSD. Significant uptrends in RA use were observed in Ontario (<i>P</i> = 0.001), Austria (<i>P</i> = 0.004), and the STS ACSD (<i>P</i> = 0.02), while a downtrend was noted in the UK (<i>P</i> = 0.015). Endoscopic RA harvesting was increasingly adopted, particularly in Ontario and the STS ACSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Global adoption of RA remains variable and generally low with a general uptrend and higher adoption of endoscopic harvesting.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12268497/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144661315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-28eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf085
Frieder Braunschweig, Emmanouil Charitakis, Finn Åkerström, Nikola Drca
{"title":"Cutting into the storm: timing, benefits, and risks of ventricular tachycardia ablation across different arrhythmia substrates.","authors":"Frieder Braunschweig, Emmanouil Charitakis, Finn Åkerström, Nikola Drca","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363212/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144983727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-23eCollection Date: 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf079
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf061.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf061.]。
{"title":"Correction to: Age and sex differences in vasovagal syncope: triggers, clinical presentation, prodromal symptoms, and head-up tilt test results.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf061.].</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205955/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-23eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082
Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan
Aims: Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information.
Methods and results: Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters.
Conclusion: Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.
{"title":"Time-frequency machine learning transfer function for central pressure waveforms.","authors":"Soha Niroumandi, Heng Wei, Faisal Amlani, Hossein Gorji, Rashid Alavi, Julio A Chirinos, Niema M Pahlevan","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Clinical studies show that pulsatile haemodynamics and pressure waveform analysis are valuable for the diagnosis and prognosis of hypertension and heart failure (HF). While generalized transfer functions (GTFs) have shown clinical significance, some studies report limitations with GTF in capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics. This study introduces a hybrid time-frequency, machine learning-based transfer function that reconstructs central pressure waveforms from peripheral measurements, accurately capturing central pulsatile haemodynamics and arterial wave-based information.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Our method uses Fourier harmonics for approximating the pressure waveform. The model is trained on these harmonics using a feed-forward neural network (FNN) with a custom time-domain cost function that captures the full temporal dynamics of physiological events during a cardiac cycle. The final hybridized-FNN transfer function model is trained, tested, and validated on data from the Framingham Heart Study (6698 participants). Our method produces carotid waveforms with median normalized mean squared error (%NMSE) values of 0.09 and 0.10 for brachial and radial inputs, compared to 0.42 and 0.26 for GTF, with similar accuracy improvements in other metrics. Correlation coefficients for the first and second forward wave times and amplitudes are 0.97, 0.93, 0.82, and 0.79 with brachial input, and 0.97, 0.92, 0.87, and 0.80 with radial input, vs. as low as 0.22 and 0.31 for GTF. Overall, our method significantly improved correlations across similarity, morphology, and wave-based parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our hybridized FNN transfer function approach enables robust calculation of the central arterial pressure waveform from a single measured peripheral waveform, preserving key physiological sequences in a cardiac cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290398/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144736342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-21eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf081
Sara Jonsson, Bengt Johansson, Anna-Karin Wikström, Jenny Alenius Dahlqvist, Christina Christersson, Peder Sörensson, Aleksandra Trzebiatowska-Krzynska, Mikael Dellborg, Ulf Thilén, Inger Sundström-Poromaa, Annika Bay
Aims: With a growing population of women with congenital heart disease (CHD), pregnancies in this group are expected to increase. However, pregnancy in women with CHD is associated with increased adverse outcomes for both mother and child. The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy and foetal complications in women with CHD and to test their association with the modified WHO (mWHO) classification.
Methods and results: Using two national registers, the national register for CHD and the Pregnancy Register, primiparous women giving birth between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Women with CHD, n = 829, and women without CHD, n = 4137, were matched by birth year and municipality in a ∼1:5 ratio. The women with CHD were classified according to the mWHO criteria. Caesarean deliveries (25.7 vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001), preterm delivery (10.3 vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001), and preeclampsia (6.2 vs. 4.1%, P = 0.007) were more common in women with CHD compared with controls. Using logistic regression, there was an association between high mWHO class (mWHO III, IV) and caesarean section [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-6.7], preterm birth (<37 weeks) (OR 8.3, 95% CI 4.1-17.1), and preeclampsia (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.9).
Conclusion: Pregnancy complications are more common in women with CHD. In women with CHD, the mWHO classification is associated with maternal complications and preterm birth. Thus, large national register data corroborate the advice provided in current guidelines, and the mWHO class is deemed a valuable risk stratification tool in women with CHD.
目的:随着患有先天性心脏病(CHD)的妇女人数的增加,这一群体的怀孕率预计会增加。然而,患有冠心病的妇女怀孕与母亲和儿童的不良后果增加有关。本研究的目的是评估CHD妇女的妊娠和胎儿并发症,并检验其与修改后的WHO (mWHO)分类的关系。方法和结果:使用两个国家登记册,即国家冠心病登记册和妊娠登记册,确定了2014年至2019年分娩的初产妇。有冠心病的妇女,n = 829,无冠心病的妇女,n = 4137,按出生年份和城市按约1:5的比例进行匹配。根据mWHO标准对冠心病患者进行分类。剖腹产(25.7% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001)、早产(10.3 vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001)和先兆子痫(6.2 vs. 4.1%, P = 0.007)在冠心病女性中比对照组更常见。采用logistic回归分析,高mWHO分级(mWHO III、IV级)与剖宫产[比值比(OR) 3.4, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.8 ~ 6.7]、早产之间存在相关性。结论:妊娠并发症在冠心病患者中更为常见。在患有冠心病的妇女中,世卫组织的分类与产妇并发症和早产有关。因此,大量的国家登记数据证实了当前指南中提供的建议,mWHO分类被认为是冠心病妇女的一个有价值的风险分层工具。
{"title":"The modified WHO class is associated with maternal complications in women with congenital heart disease.","authors":"Sara Jonsson, Bengt Johansson, Anna-Karin Wikström, Jenny Alenius Dahlqvist, Christina Christersson, Peder Sörensson, Aleksandra Trzebiatowska-Krzynska, Mikael Dellborg, Ulf Thilén, Inger Sundström-Poromaa, Annika Bay","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf081","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>With a growing population of women with congenital heart disease (CHD), pregnancies in this group are expected to increase. However, pregnancy in women with CHD is associated with increased adverse outcomes for both mother and child. The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy and foetal complications in women with CHD and to test their association with the modified WHO (mWHO) classification.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using two national registers, the national register for CHD and the Pregnancy Register, primiparous women giving birth between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Women with CHD, <i>n</i> = 829, and women without CHD, <i>n</i> = 4137, were matched by birth year and municipality in a ∼1:5 ratio. The women with CHD were classified according to the mWHO criteria. Caesarean deliveries (25.7 vs. 17.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), preterm delivery (10.3 vs. 6.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and preeclampsia (6.2 vs. 4.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.007) were more common in women with CHD compared with controls. Using logistic regression, there was an association between high mWHO class (mWHO III, IV) and caesarean section [odds ratio (OR) 3.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-6.7], preterm birth (<37 weeks) (OR 8.3, 95% CI 4.1-17.1), and preeclampsia (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy complications are more common in women with CHD. In women with CHD, the mWHO classification is associated with maternal complications and preterm birth. Thus, large national register data corroborate the advice provided in current guidelines, and the mWHO class is deemed a valuable risk stratification tool in women with CHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241849/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144610694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-20eCollection Date: 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf075
Joerg Herrmann
{"title":"Advance at a glance: contributions to cardio-oncology.","authors":"Joerg Herrmann","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf075","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf075","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204645/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-19eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf076
Abhishek Maan, Maaz Waseem, Alex Carter, Kirtivardhan Vashishtha, Tarvinder Dhanjal, Jacob Koruth, E Kevin Heist
Aims: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has been shown to reduce the recurrence of VT episodes, but the timing of performing VT ablation (early; at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation) or (deferred: after the patient has received ICD shocks) remains controversial. The objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with the aim of comparing outcome of VT ablation stratified by procedural timing.
Methods and results: We conducted a meta-analysis of seven landmark RCTs which included patients with ICM who were either at a high risk of VT or experienced VT/ICD shocks. The primary outcome of VT recurrence was compared according to the timing of performing VT ablation (early vs. deferred). In addition, we also compared the secondary outcome of cardiac mortality. Following a comprehensive search strategy, a total of seven RCTs were included within the final analysis. Based on a pooled analysis, early VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome [pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.95, P < 0.05] in comparison with a 'deferred VT ablation' strategy. The cumulative absolute risk reduction (ARR) for the primary outcome was 0.21, and number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent the outcome of VT recurrence was 4.81. Furthermore, the effect size of early VT ablation compared to a deferred VT ablation approach was more pronounced in reduction of ICD shocks in the subgroup of patients with LVEF > 30% vs. those with LVEF < 30% (pooled OR of 0.65, 95% CI of 0.54-0.79, P = 0.01). For the secondary outcomes, we observed that an earlier timing of VT ablation was also associated with both a decrease in cardiac mortality (pooled OR of 0.59, 95% CI of 0.43-0.82) and in the subsequent risk of VT storm (pooled OR of 0.63, 95% CI of 0.51-0.78) when compared with a deferred timing. The cumulative ARR for cardiac mortality was 0.07 and NNT was 15.
Conclusion: The findings from this pooled analysis of seven major RCTs suggest that performing early VT ablation may be beneficial in reducing recurrent VT, ICD shocks, and electrical storm and could also improve cardiac mortality. The benefit of performing early VT ablation was greater in patients with LVEF of >30% amongst this ICM cohort.
{"title":"Early vs. deferred catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients of ischaemic substrate: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.","authors":"Abhishek Maan, Maaz Waseem, Alex Carter, Kirtivardhan Vashishtha, Tarvinder Dhanjal, Jacob Koruth, E Kevin Heist","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf076","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation has been shown to reduce the recurrence of VT episodes, but the timing of performing VT ablation (early; at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation) or (deferred: after the patient has received ICD shocks) remains controversial. The objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with the aim of comparing outcome of VT ablation stratified by procedural timing.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of seven landmark RCTs which included patients with ICM who were either at a high risk of VT or experienced VT/ICD shocks. The primary outcome of VT recurrence was compared according to the timing of performing VT ablation (early vs. deferred). In addition, we also compared the secondary outcome of cardiac mortality. Following a comprehensive search strategy, a total of seven RCTs were included within the final analysis. Based on a pooled analysis, early VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome [pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.95, <i>P</i> < 0.05] in comparison with a 'deferred VT ablation' strategy. The cumulative absolute risk reduction (ARR) for the primary outcome was 0.21, and number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent the outcome of VT recurrence was 4.81. Furthermore, the effect size of early VT ablation compared to a deferred VT ablation approach was more pronounced in reduction of ICD shocks in the subgroup of patients with LVEF > 30% vs. those with LVEF < 30% (pooled OR of 0.65, 95% CI of 0.54-0.79, <i>P</i> = 0.01). For the secondary outcomes, we observed that an earlier timing of VT ablation was also associated with both a decrease in cardiac mortality (pooled OR of 0.59, 95% CI of 0.43-0.82) and in the subsequent risk of VT storm (pooled OR of 0.63, 95% CI of 0.51-0.78) when compared with a deferred timing. The cumulative ARR for cardiac mortality was 0.07 and NNT was 15.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from this pooled analysis of seven major RCTs suggest that performing early VT ablation may be beneficial in reducing recurrent VT, ICD shocks, and electrical storm and could also improve cardiac mortality. The benefit of performing early VT ablation was greater in patients with LVEF of >30% amongst this ICM cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 4","pages":"oeaf076"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236160/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144593226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aims: Cardiac pacing aims to replicate physiological heart rhythm. While left bundle area pacing (LBAP) enhances left ventricular (LV) activation, it often struggles to fully address interventricular dyssynchrony. Bipolar LBAP with anodal ring capture (LBAP-ARC) offers a potential solution by synchronously activating both left and right bundle branches. This study aims to compare the effects of unipolar LBAP and LBAP-ARC on ventricular synchrony and myocardial function.
Methods and results: A prospective cohort study was conducted with enroling 32 patients undergoing successful LBAP implantation. Pacing thresholds, lead impedance, QRS duration, and echocardiographic parameters-including LV and right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), systolic dyssynchrony index, and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD)-were assessed under unipolar LBAP and LBAP-ARC configurations. Left bundle area pacing with anodal ring capture significantly improved LV GLS (-16.09% vs. -14.85%, P = 0.0006) and reduced IVMD (5.13 ms vs. 21.76 ms, P < 0.0001) compared to unipolar LBAP at 1-week follow-up, and these improvements persisted at 3 months (-16.70% vs. -14.98%, P = 0.0005 for LV GLS; 8.01 ms vs. 21.75 ms, P = 0.0045 for IVMD). Subgroup analysis showed enhanced LV (-16.47% vs. -14.76%, P = 0.0094) and RV GLS (-16.24% vs. -15.86%, P = 0.0344) in patients with biphasic QRS patterns in leads II/III. Improvements in RV GLS were less pronounced in patients with predominantly positive QRS patterns in leads II/III.
Conclusion: Left bundle area pacing with anodal ring capture enhances ventricular synchrony and improves subclinical myocardial function compared to unipolar LBAP, establishing itself as a promising approach in physiological cardiac pacing.
目的:心脏起搏的目的是复制生理心律。虽然左束区起搏(LBAP)增强左室(LV)的激活,但它往往难以完全解决室间非同步化。带阳极环捕获(LBAP- arc)的双极LBAP通过同步激活左右束分支提供了一种潜在的解决方案。本研究旨在比较单极LBAP和LBAP- arc对心室同步化和心肌功能的影响。方法和结果:对32例成功植入LBAP的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。在单极LBAP和LBAP- arc配置下评估起搏阈值、导联阻抗、QRS持续时间和超声心动图参数,包括左室和右室(RV)整体纵向应变(GLS)、收缩非同步化指数和室间机械延迟(IVMD)。在1周的随访中,与单极LBAP相比,采用阳极环捕获的左束区域起搏显著改善了左室GLS (-16.09% vs -14.85%, P = 0.0006),降低了IVMD (5.13 ms vs. 21.76 ms, P < 0.0001),并且这些改善持续到3个月(左室GLS -16.70% vs. -14.98%, P = 0.0005;8.01 ms vs. 21.75 ms (P = 0.0045)。亚组分析显示,II/III导联双相QRS模式患者的LV (-16.47% vs. -14.76%, P = 0.0094)和RV GLS (-16.24% vs. -15.86%, P = 0.0344)增强。在II/III导联中QRS模式主要为阳性的患者中,RV GLS的改善不太明显。结论:与单极LBAP相比,带阳极环捕获的左束区起搏增强了心室同步性,改善了亚临床心肌功能,是一种很有前景的生理心脏起搏方法。
{"title":"Enhanced ventricular synchrony and myocardial function with bipolar left bundle area pacing: a comparative study of anodal ring capture versus unipolar pacing.","authors":"Jeng-Yu Jan, Kuo-Li Pan, Pei-Chun Yeh, Wan-Chun Ho, Huang-Chung Chen, Wei-Chieh Lee, Mien-Cheng Chen, Yu-Sheng Lin","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf077","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cardiac pacing aims to replicate physiological heart rhythm. While left bundle area pacing (LBAP) enhances left ventricular (LV) activation, it often struggles to fully address interventricular dyssynchrony. Bipolar LBAP with anodal ring capture (LBAP-ARC) offers a potential solution by synchronously activating both left and right bundle branches. This study aims to compare the effects of unipolar LBAP and LBAP-ARC on ventricular synchrony and myocardial function.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted with enroling 32 patients undergoing successful LBAP implantation. Pacing thresholds, lead impedance, QRS duration, and echocardiographic parameters-including LV and right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), systolic dyssynchrony index, and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD)-were assessed under unipolar LBAP and LBAP-ARC configurations. Left bundle area pacing with anodal ring capture significantly improved LV GLS (-16.09% vs. -14.85%, <i>P</i> = 0.0006) and reduced IVMD (5.13 ms vs. 21.76 ms, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) compared to unipolar LBAP at 1-week follow-up, and these improvements persisted at 3 months (-16.70% vs. -14.98%, <i>P</i> = 0.0005 for LV GLS; 8.01 ms vs. 21.75 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.0045 for IVMD). Subgroup analysis showed enhanced LV (-16.47% vs. -14.76%, <i>P</i> = 0.0094) and RV GLS (-16.24% vs. -15.86%, <i>P</i> = 0.0344) in patients with biphasic QRS patterns in leads II/III. Improvements in RV GLS were less pronounced in patients with predominantly positive QRS patterns in leads II/III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Left bundle area pacing with anodal ring capture enhances ventricular synchrony and improves subclinical myocardial function compared to unipolar LBAP, establishing itself as a promising approach in physiological cardiac pacing.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-18eCollection Date: 2025-05-01DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf053
Patrick Tran, Mithilesh Joshi, Prithwish Banerjee, Sendhil Balasubramanian, Uday Dandekar, Emmanuel Otabor, Stephen Adeyeye, Jaffar Al-Sheikhli, Michael Kuehl
Aims: This study characterizes the under-recognized normotensive cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotype by analysing fatal cases, comparing haemodynamics, shock trajectories, and management gaps with hypotensive CS.
Methods and results: We analysed 112 patients who died from CS between 2017 and 2022. Patients > 70 were excluded due to local eligibility criteria. Normotensive (n = 51) and hypotensive CS (n = 61) had similar degrees of cardiac impairment, with cardiac indices well below 2.0 L/min/m2 and LVEF < 35%. Both groups exhibited comparable end-organ dysfunction, including lactate levels (7.0 ± 5.0 vs. 6.1 ± 5.6 mmol/L, P = 0.441) and acute liver injury (51-56%). Hypotensive CS typically followed a predictable decline in shock stage [75.4% deteriorated to Society for Cardiovascular Angiography Interventions (SCAI) stages D-E], whereas normotensive CS demonstrated less predictable trajectories, with 51% showing apparent stability before rapid deterioration and death. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that only the rise in serum creatinine weakly predicted deterioration to advanced SCAI stages (Area under the curve 0.62, P = 0.035), while initial lactate and liver function tests lacked predictive value. Normotensive cases had a median 14 h longer referral window from onset of CS but were referred less frequently. Twenty-six were considered potential candidates for advanced heart failure therapy but were not referred.
Conclusion: Normotensive and hypotensive CS share similar degrees of hypoperfusion but differ in their shock trajectories. The delay in referrals for normotensive CS highlights the need for earlier recognition of this phenotype and standardized protocols to ensure timely referrals for mechanical circulatory support.
目的:本研究通过分析死亡病例,比较血液动力学,休克轨迹和低血压CS的管理差距,来表征未被认识到的正常血压心源性休克(CS)表型。方法和结果:我们分析了2017年至2022年期间死于CS的112例患者。根据当地的资格标准,患者bb0 70被排除在外。正常血压组(51例)和低血压组(61例)的心脏损害程度相似,心脏指数远低于2.0 L/min/m2, LVEF < 35%。两组均表现出相似的终末器官功能障碍,包括乳酸水平(7.0±5.0 vs. 6.1±5.6 mmol/L, P = 0.441)和急性肝损伤(51-56%)。低血压CS通常在休克阶段出现可预测的下降[75.4%恶化到心血管血管造影干预协会(SCAI) D-E阶段],而正常血压CS表现出难以预测的轨迹,51%在快速恶化和死亡之前表现出明显的稳定性。受试者工作特征分析显示,只有血清肌酐升高能微弱预测SCAI进展(曲线下面积0.62,P = 0.035),而初始乳酸和肝功能检测缺乏预测价值。血压正常的病例从CS发病起的转诊窗口平均长14小时,但转诊频率较低。26例被认为是晚期心力衰竭治疗的潜在候选人,但没有转诊。结论:正常血压和低血压的CS具有相似的低灌注程度,但其休克轨迹不同。正常CS转诊的延迟突出了早期认识这种表型和标准化方案的必要性,以确保及时转诊机械循环支持。
{"title":"Learning from cardiogenic shock deaths: a comparative analysis between hypotensive and normotensive cardiogenic shock.","authors":"Patrick Tran, Mithilesh Joshi, Prithwish Banerjee, Sendhil Balasubramanian, Uday Dandekar, Emmanuel Otabor, Stephen Adeyeye, Jaffar Al-Sheikhli, Michael Kuehl","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf053","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study characterizes the under-recognized normotensive cardiogenic shock (CS) phenotype by analysing fatal cases, comparing haemodynamics, shock trajectories, and management gaps with hypotensive CS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 112 patients who died from CS between 2017 and 2022. Patients > 70 were excluded due to local eligibility criteria. Normotensive (<i>n</i> = 51) and hypotensive CS (<i>n</i> = 61) had similar degrees of cardiac impairment, with cardiac indices well below 2.0 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> and LVEF < 35%. Both groups exhibited comparable end-organ dysfunction, including lactate levels (7.0 ± 5.0 vs. 6.1 ± 5.6 mmol/L, <i>P</i> = 0.441) and acute liver injury (51-56%). Hypotensive CS typically followed a predictable decline in shock stage [75.4% deteriorated to Society for Cardiovascular Angiography Interventions (SCAI) stages D-E], whereas normotensive CS demonstrated less predictable trajectories, with 51% showing apparent stability before rapid deterioration and death. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that only the rise in serum creatinine weakly predicted deterioration to advanced SCAI stages (Area under the curve 0.62, <i>P</i> = 0.035), while initial lactate and liver function tests lacked predictive value. Normotensive cases had a median 14 h longer referral window from onset of CS but were referred less frequently. Twenty-six were considered potential candidates for advanced heart failure therapy but were not referred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normotensive and hypotensive CS share similar degrees of hypoperfusion but differ in their shock trajectories. The delay in referrals for normotensive CS highlights the need for earlier recognition of this phenotype and standardized protocols to ensure timely referrals for mechanical circulatory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144531932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}