Pub Date : 2024-09-06DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.08.001
Lorenzo Olivero MD , Jorge Sinclair MD , Trisha Singh MD , Aditya A. Khanijo MBBS , Gunjan Mundhra MBBS , Ana-Maria Chindris MD , Terri Menser PhD , Pablo Moreno Franco MD , Benjamin D. Pollock PhD , Razvan M. Chirila MD
This study investigated the accuracy of mortality attributions assigned by the US News and World Report (USNWR) to the diabetes and endocrinology specialty. We reviewed medical records of all consecutive Medicare fee-for-service inpatients at Mayo Clinic, Florida (Jacksonville, Florida) with a Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group included in the USNWR Diabetes & Endocrinology specialty cohort admitted from November 2018 to April 2022, with documented mortality in our institution’s electronic health record within 30 days of the index admission. A clinician adjudicated the primary cause of death, categorizing it as diabetes or endocrine, cancer, failure to thrive, or other. Among 49 deceased patients, only 7 (14.3%) had diabetes or an endocrine-related cause of death. Cancer (49.0%) and failure to thrive (30.6%) were the leading causes. This substantial discrepancy (86% misattribution) suggests USNWR’s methodology might not precisely reflect the quality of care, potentially misleading patients and impacting hospital rankings.
{"title":"Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example","authors":"Lorenzo Olivero MD , Jorge Sinclair MD , Trisha Singh MD , Aditya A. Khanijo MBBS , Gunjan Mundhra MBBS , Ana-Maria Chindris MD , Terri Menser PhD , Pablo Moreno Franco MD , Benjamin D. Pollock PhD , Razvan M. Chirila MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the accuracy of mortality attributions assigned by the US News and World Report (USNWR) to the diabetes and endocrinology specialty. We reviewed medical records of all consecutive Medicare fee-for-service inpatients at Mayo Clinic, Florida (Jacksonville, Florida) with a Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group included in the USNWR Diabetes & Endocrinology specialty cohort admitted from November 2018 to April 2022, with documented mortality in our institution’s electronic health record within 30 days of the index admission. A clinician adjudicated the primary cause of death, categorizing it as diabetes or endocrine, cancer, failure to thrive, or other. Among 49 deceased patients, only 7 (14.3%) had diabetes or an endocrine-related cause of death. Cancer (49.0%) and failure to thrive (30.6%) were the leading causes. This substantial discrepancy (86% misattribution) suggests USNWR’s methodology might not precisely reflect the quality of care, potentially misleading patients and impacting hospital rankings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 475-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000535/pdfft?md5=13e13dc82a20e1c13a4b590ae2b0c6c8&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000535-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142151965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-24DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.003
Beth Frates MD, FACLM, DipABLM , Hugo A. Ortega MD, MSEd, DipABLM , Kelly J. Freeman MSN, AGPCNP-BC, DipACLM , John Patrick T. Co MD, MPH, MBA , Melissa Bernstein PhD, RDN, LD, FAND, DipACLM
The relationship between lifestyle behaviors and common chronic conditions is well established. Lifestyle medicine (LM) interventions to modify health behaviors can dramatically improve the health of individuals and populations. There is an urgent need to meaningfully integrate LM into medical curricula horizontally across the medical domains and vertically in each year of school and training. Including LM content in medical and health professional curricula and training programs has been challenging. Barriers to LM integration include lack of awareness and prioritization of LM, limited time in the curricula, and too few LM-trained faculty to teach and role model the practice of LM. This limits the ability of health care professionals to provide effective LM and precludes the wide-reaching benefits of LM from being fully realized. Early innovators developed novel tools and resources aligned with current evidence for introducing LM into didactic and experiential learning. This review aimed to examine the educational efforts in each LM pillar for undergraduate and graduate medical education. A PubMed-based literature review was undertaken using the following search terms: lifestyle medicine, education, medical school, residency, and healthcare professionals. We map the LM competencies to the core competency domains of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. We highlight opportunities to train faculty, residents, and students. Moreover, we identify available evidence-based resources. This article serves as a “call to action” to incorporate LM across the spectrum of medical education curricula and training.
{"title":"Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact","authors":"Beth Frates MD, FACLM, DipABLM , Hugo A. Ortega MD, MSEd, DipABLM , Kelly J. Freeman MSN, AGPCNP-BC, DipACLM , John Patrick T. Co MD, MPH, MBA , Melissa Bernstein PhD, RDN, LD, FAND, DipACLM","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The relationship between lifestyle behaviors and common chronic conditions is well established. Lifestyle medicine (LM) interventions to modify health behaviors can dramatically improve the health of individuals and populations. There is an urgent need to meaningfully integrate LM into medical curricula horizontally across the medical domains and vertically in each year of school and training. Including LM content in medical and health professional curricula and training programs has been challenging. Barriers to LM integration include lack of awareness and prioritization of LM, limited time in the curricula, and too few LM-trained faculty to teach and role model the practice of LM. This limits the ability of health care professionals to provide effective LM and precludes the wide-reaching benefits of LM from being fully realized. Early innovators developed novel tools and resources aligned with current evidence for introducing LM into didactic and experiential learning. This review aimed to examine the educational efforts in each LM pillar for undergraduate and graduate medical education. A PubMed-based literature review was undertaken using the following search terms: <em>lifestyle medicine, education, medical school, residency, and healthcare professionals</em>. We map the LM competencies to the core competency domains of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. We highlight opportunities to train faculty, residents, and students. Moreover, we identify available evidence-based resources. This article serves as a “call to action” to incorporate LM across the spectrum of medical education curricula and training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 451-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000444/pdfft?md5=1a959f156528bc6f7c327b8f469a212c&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000444-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142050041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.007
Elizabeth J. Cathcart-Rake MD , Amye Tevaarwerk MD , Aminah Jatoi MD , Evelyn F. Carroll MD , NFN Scout MA, PhD , Victor G. Chedid MD, MS , Cesar A. Gonzalez PhD , Kelli Fee-Schroeder DNP, RN, OCN , Jewel M. Kling MD, MPH , Chrisandra L. Shufelt MD, MS , Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD , Caroline Davidge-Pitts MBBCh
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience disparities in cancer care, including more late-stage diagnoses, worse cancer-related outcomes, and an increased number of unaddressed and more severe symptoms related to cancer and cancer-directed therapy. This article outlines plans to address the unique needs of TGD people through a TGD-focused oncology clinic. Such a clinic could be structured by upholding the following tenets: (1) champion a supportive, gender-affirming environment that seeks to continuously improve, (2) include a transdisciplinary team of specialists who are dedicated to TGD cancer care, and (3) initiate and embrace TGD-patient-centric research on health outcomes and health care delivery.
{"title":"Building a Cancer Care Clinic for Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals","authors":"Elizabeth J. Cathcart-Rake MD , Amye Tevaarwerk MD , Aminah Jatoi MD , Evelyn F. Carroll MD , NFN Scout MA, PhD , Victor G. Chedid MD, MS , Cesar A. Gonzalez PhD , Kelli Fee-Schroeder DNP, RN, OCN , Jewel M. Kling MD, MPH , Chrisandra L. Shufelt MD, MS , Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD , Caroline Davidge-Pitts MBBCh","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience disparities in cancer care, including more late-stage diagnoses, worse cancer-related outcomes, and an increased number of unaddressed and more severe symptoms related to cancer and cancer-directed therapy. This article outlines plans to address the unique needs of TGD people through a TGD-focused oncology clinic. Such a clinic could be structured by upholding the following tenets: (1) champion a supportive, gender-affirming environment that seeks to continuously improve, (2) include a transdisciplinary team of specialists who are dedicated to TGD cancer care, and (3) initiate and embrace TGD-patient-centric research on health outcomes and health care delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 443-450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000481/pdfft?md5=7e3b48bbfa7e691ca0319b97234056da&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000481-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142040888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-21DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.002
Gregory A. Nuttall MD , Michael P. Merren MD, MS , Julian Naranjo DO , Erica R. Portner RRT, LRT , Amanda R. Ambrose MD , Charanjit S. Rihal MD
Objective
To evaluate whether major adverse cardiac events (MACE) continue to be a major causative factor for mortality after noncardiac surgery.
Patients and Methods
We performed retrospective study of 75,410 adult noncardiac surgery patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester, between January 1, 2016, and May 4, 2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed and data collected on all deaths within 30 days (n=692 patients) of surgery. The incidence of death due to MACE was calculated.
Results
Postoperative MACE occurred in 150 patients (21.4 events per 10,000 patients; 95% CI, 18.2-25.2 events per 10,000 patients) with most occurring within 3 days of surgery (n=113). Postoperative MACE events were associated with atrial fibrillation with rapid rate response in 25 patients (16.7%), sepsis in 15 patients (10%), and bleeding in 15 patients (10%). There were 12 intraoperative deaths of which 9 were due to exsanguination (75%) and the remaining 3 (25%) due to cardiac arrest. Of the 56 deaths on the first 24 hours after surgery, 7 were due to hemorrhage, 17 due to cardiovascular causes, 20 due to sepsis, and 7 due to neurologic disease. The leading cause of total death over 30 days postoperatively was sepsis (28%), followed by malignancy (27%), cardiovascular disease (12%) neurologic disease (12%), and hemorrhage (5%).
Conclusion
MACE was not the leading cause of death both intraoperatively and postoperatively.
{"title":"Perioperative Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 75,446 Noncardiac Surgery Patients","authors":"Gregory A. Nuttall MD , Michael P. Merren MD, MS , Julian Naranjo DO , Erica R. Portner RRT, LRT , Amanda R. Ambrose MD , Charanjit S. Rihal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate whether major adverse cardiac events (MACE) continue to be a major causative factor for mortality after noncardiac surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We performed retrospective study of 75,410 adult noncardiac surgery patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester, between January 1, 2016, and May 4, 2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed and data collected on all deaths within 30 days (n=692 patients) of surgery. The incidence of death due to MACE was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Postoperative MACE occurred in 150 patients (21.4 events per 10,000 patients; 95% CI, 18.2-25.2 events per 10,000 patients) with most occurring within 3 days of surgery (n=113). Postoperative MACE events were associated with atrial fibrillation with rapid rate response in 25 patients (16.7%), sepsis in 15 patients (10%), and bleeding in 15 patients (10%). There were 12 intraoperative deaths of which 9 were due to exsanguination (75%) and the remaining 3 (25%) due to cardiac arrest. Of the 56 deaths on the first 24 hours after surgery, 7 were due to hemorrhage, 17 due to cardiovascular causes, 20 due to sepsis, and 7 due to neurologic disease. The leading cause of total death over 30 days postoperatively was sepsis (28%), followed by malignancy (27%), cardiovascular disease (12%) neurologic disease (12%), and hemorrhage (5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MACE was not the leading cause of death both intraoperatively and postoperatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 435-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000432/pdfft?md5=0098ca40105e5ac2d80dc6de8fa7b7d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000432-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142040887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-12DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001
Kristi E. Artz MD , Timothy D. Phillips PT, DPT , Janine M. Moore PT, MS, OCS , Kara E. Tibbe MBA
Value-based health care has been accelerated by alternative payment models and has catalyzed the redesign of care delivery across the nation. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is one of the fastest growing medical specialties and has emerged as a high-value solution for root cause treatment of chronic disease. This review detailed a large integrated health care delivery system’s value transformation efforts in the nonoperative treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by placing patient-centric, team-based, lifestyle-focused care at the foundation. With an economic and treatment imperative to reimagine care, recognizing more intervention is not always better, a collaborative approach was designed, which placed functional improvement of the patient at the center. This article described the process of implementing LM into an MSK model of care. The change management process impacted clinical, operational, and benefit plan design to facilitate an integrated care model. A new understanding of patients’ co-occurring physical impairments, medical comorbidities, and behavioral health needs was necessary for clinicians to make the shift from a pathoanatomic, transactional model of care to a biopsychosocial, longitudinal model of care. The authors explored the novel intersection of the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of care using LM principles to achieve greater value for the MSK patient population.
{"title":"Redesigning the Care of Musculoskeletal Conditions With Lifestyle Medicine","authors":"Kristi E. Artz MD , Timothy D. Phillips PT, DPT , Janine M. Moore PT, MS, OCS , Kara E. Tibbe MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Value-based health care has been accelerated by alternative payment models and has catalyzed the redesign of care delivery across the nation. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is one of the fastest growing medical specialties and has emerged as a high-value solution for root cause treatment of chronic disease. This review detailed a large integrated health care delivery system’s value transformation efforts in the nonoperative treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by placing patient-centric, team-based, lifestyle-focused care at the foundation. With an economic and treatment imperative to reimagine care, recognizing more intervention is not always better, a collaborative approach was designed, which placed functional improvement of the patient at the center. This article described the process of implementing LM into an MSK model of care. The change management process impacted clinical, operational, and benefit plan design to facilitate an integrated care model. A new understanding of patients’ co-occurring physical impairments, medical comorbidities, and behavioral health needs was necessary for clinicians to make the shift from a pathoanatomic, transactional model of care to a biopsychosocial, longitudinal model of care. The authors explored the novel intersection of the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of care using LM principles to achieve greater value for the MSK patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 418-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000420/pdfft?md5=f0fcd09920f1f12c0732340e2c1eed5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000420-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-11DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006
Stephen W. English MD, MBA , Alejandro A. Rabinstein MD , Melissa A. Lyle MD
{"title":"Donation After Circulatory Death Donor Prognostication: An Emerging Challenge in Heart Transplantation","authors":"Stephen W. English MD, MBA , Alejandro A. Rabinstein MD , Melissa A. Lyle MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 431-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254245482400047X/pdfft?md5=87e486c33d4cbaee72dac73d60727771&pid=1-s2.0-S254245482400047X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141954015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003
Krystof Stanek MD , Mohammad T. Hussain MD , Aaron C. Spaulding PhD , Shalmali Borkar MD, MPH , Marwan E. Shaikh MD
Objective
To evaluate prescribing practices for the anti-Xa reversal agent, andexanet alfa, to identify challenges in ordering and administering this medication, and to offer recommendations to improve patient safety.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective study reviewed all adult patients treated with andexanet alfa (AA) at a single institution between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. We identified ordering and administration benchmarks based on recommendations from previous clinical trials on AA. We then reviewed these medical records to determine compliance with these benchmarks. We also collected data related to thrombotic complications and mortality.
Results
Twenty-two AA dosing sets (loading and infusion dose) were given to 20 patients. Eight (36%) dosing sets met our ordering benchmarks regarding appropriate dose, time since last direct oral anticoagulants, urgency of administration, and documentation. Three (14%) dosing sets met the administrative benchmarks of being started within 30 minutes of the initial order, and 13 (59%) dosing sets had timely infusion of the infusion dose after the loading dose. No dosing set met all our administration benchmarks. There was 1 thrombotic event within 24 hours of the correct AA dose and 1 potential death related to AA.
Conclusion
This study highlights challenges in ordering and administering AA at our institution and brings awareness to potential similar concerns at other institutions. These challenges also identified the need for optimized order sets, a streamlined administration process, and frequent provider education to improve patient safety.
目的:评估抗 Xa 逆转剂安达赛酮α的处方做法,确定在订购和使用这种药物时遇到的挑战,并提出改善患者安全的建议。这项回顾性研究回顾了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间在一家机构接受安达赛酮α(AA)治疗的所有成人患者。我们根据以往 AA 临床试验的建议确定了下单和给药基准。然后,我们审查了这些病历,以确定是否符合这些基准。我们还收集了与血栓并发症和死亡率相关的数据。我们为 20 名患者提供了 22 套 AA 给药方案(负荷剂量和输注剂量)。八套配药方案(36%)符合我们在适当剂量、距上次直接口服抗凝药的时间、给药的紧迫性和文件记录方面的订购基准。三套配药方案(14%)达到了在首次下单后 30 分钟内开始给药的管理基准,13 套配药方案(59%)在负荷剂量后及时输注了输注剂量。没有一组配料符合我们的所有管理基准。在使用正确 AA 剂量 24 小时内发生了 1 起血栓事件,1 例死亡可能与 AA 有关。这项研究凸显了本机构在订购和使用 AA 时面临的挑战,同时也让其他机构意识到可能存在类似的问题。这些挑战也明确了优化医嘱集、简化管理流程和经常对医护人员进行教育以提高患者安全的必要性。
{"title":"Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa","authors":"Krystof Stanek MD , Mohammad T. Hussain MD , Aaron C. Spaulding PhD , Shalmali Borkar MD, MPH , Marwan E. Shaikh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate prescribing practices for the anti-Xa reversal agent, andexanet alfa, to identify challenges in ordering and administering this medication, and to offer recommendations to improve patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study reviewed all adult patients treated with andexanet alfa (AA) at a single institution between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. We identified ordering and administration benchmarks based on recommendations from previous clinical trials on AA. We then reviewed these medical records to determine compliance with these benchmarks. We also collected data related to thrombotic complications and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two AA dosing sets (loading and infusion dose) were given to 20 patients. Eight (36%) dosing sets met our ordering benchmarks regarding appropriate dose, time since last direct oral anticoagulants, urgency of administration, and documentation. Three (14%) dosing sets met the administrative benchmarks of being started within 30 minutes of the initial order, and 13 (59%) dosing sets had timely infusion of the infusion dose after the loading dose. No dosing set met all our administration benchmarks. There was 1 thrombotic event within 24 hours of the correct AA dose and 1 potential death related to AA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights challenges in ordering and administering AA at our institution and brings awareness to potential similar concerns at other institutions. These challenges also identified the need for optimized order sets, a streamlined administration process, and frequent provider education to improve patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 407-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000134/pdfft?md5=0798b850a649b22639f8402e72ce6e3f&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000134-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}