Pub Date : 2024-08-12DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001
Kristi E. Artz MD , Timothy D. Phillips PT, DPT , Janine M. Moore PT, MS, OCS , Kara E. Tibbe MBA
Value-based health care has been accelerated by alternative payment models and has catalyzed the redesign of care delivery across the nation. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is one of the fastest growing medical specialties and has emerged as a high-value solution for root cause treatment of chronic disease. This review detailed a large integrated health care delivery system’s value transformation efforts in the nonoperative treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by placing patient-centric, team-based, lifestyle-focused care at the foundation. With an economic and treatment imperative to reimagine care, recognizing more intervention is not always better, a collaborative approach was designed, which placed functional improvement of the patient at the center. This article described the process of implementing LM into an MSK model of care. The change management process impacted clinical, operational, and benefit plan design to facilitate an integrated care model. A new understanding of patients’ co-occurring physical impairments, medical comorbidities, and behavioral health needs was necessary for clinicians to make the shift from a pathoanatomic, transactional model of care to a biopsychosocial, longitudinal model of care. The authors explored the novel intersection of the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of care using LM principles to achieve greater value for the MSK patient population.
{"title":"Redesigning the Care of Musculoskeletal Conditions With Lifestyle Medicine","authors":"Kristi E. Artz MD , Timothy D. Phillips PT, DPT , Janine M. Moore PT, MS, OCS , Kara E. Tibbe MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Value-based health care has been accelerated by alternative payment models and has catalyzed the redesign of care delivery across the nation. Lifestyle medicine (LM) is one of the fastest growing medical specialties and has emerged as a high-value solution for root cause treatment of chronic disease. This review detailed a large integrated health care delivery system’s value transformation efforts in the nonoperative treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by placing patient-centric, team-based, lifestyle-focused care at the foundation. With an economic and treatment imperative to reimagine care, recognizing more intervention is not always better, a collaborative approach was designed, which placed functional improvement of the patient at the center. This article described the process of implementing LM into an MSK model of care. The change management process impacted clinical, operational, and benefit plan design to facilitate an integrated care model. A new understanding of patients’ co-occurring physical impairments, medical comorbidities, and behavioral health needs was necessary for clinicians to make the shift from a pathoanatomic, transactional model of care to a biopsychosocial, longitudinal model of care. The authors explored the novel intersection of the implementation of a biopsychosocial model of care using LM principles to achieve greater value for the MSK patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 418-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000420/pdfft?md5=f0fcd09920f1f12c0732340e2c1eed5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000420-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-11DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006
Stephen W. English MD, MBA , Alejandro A. Rabinstein MD , Melissa A. Lyle MD
{"title":"Donation After Circulatory Death Donor Prognostication: An Emerging Challenge in Heart Transplantation","authors":"Stephen W. English MD, MBA , Alejandro A. Rabinstein MD , Melissa A. Lyle MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 431-434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254245482400047X/pdfft?md5=87e486c33d4cbaee72dac73d60727771&pid=1-s2.0-S254245482400047X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141954015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003
Krystof Stanek MD , Mohammad T. Hussain MD , Aaron C. Spaulding PhD , Shalmali Borkar MD, MPH , Marwan E. Shaikh MD
Objective
To evaluate prescribing practices for the anti-Xa reversal agent, andexanet alfa, to identify challenges in ordering and administering this medication, and to offer recommendations to improve patient safety.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective study reviewed all adult patients treated with andexanet alfa (AA) at a single institution between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. We identified ordering and administration benchmarks based on recommendations from previous clinical trials on AA. We then reviewed these medical records to determine compliance with these benchmarks. We also collected data related to thrombotic complications and mortality.
Results
Twenty-two AA dosing sets (loading and infusion dose) were given to 20 patients. Eight (36%) dosing sets met our ordering benchmarks regarding appropriate dose, time since last direct oral anticoagulants, urgency of administration, and documentation. Three (14%) dosing sets met the administrative benchmarks of being started within 30 minutes of the initial order, and 13 (59%) dosing sets had timely infusion of the infusion dose after the loading dose. No dosing set met all our administration benchmarks. There was 1 thrombotic event within 24 hours of the correct AA dose and 1 potential death related to AA.
Conclusion
This study highlights challenges in ordering and administering AA at our institution and brings awareness to potential similar concerns at other institutions. These challenges also identified the need for optimized order sets, a streamlined administration process, and frequent provider education to improve patient safety.
目的:评估抗 Xa 逆转剂安达赛酮α的处方做法,确定在订购和使用这种药物时遇到的挑战,并提出改善患者安全的建议。这项回顾性研究回顾了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日期间在一家机构接受安达赛酮α(AA)治疗的所有成人患者。我们根据以往 AA 临床试验的建议确定了下单和给药基准。然后,我们审查了这些病历,以确定是否符合这些基准。我们还收集了与血栓并发症和死亡率相关的数据。我们为 20 名患者提供了 22 套 AA 给药方案(负荷剂量和输注剂量)。八套配药方案(36%)符合我们在适当剂量、距上次直接口服抗凝药的时间、给药的紧迫性和文件记录方面的订购基准。三套配药方案(14%)达到了在首次下单后 30 分钟内开始给药的管理基准,13 套配药方案(59%)在负荷剂量后及时输注了输注剂量。没有一组配料符合我们的所有管理基准。在使用正确 AA 剂量 24 小时内发生了 1 起血栓事件,1 例死亡可能与 AA 有关。这项研究凸显了本机构在订购和使用 AA 时面临的挑战,同时也让其他机构意识到可能存在类似的问题。这些挑战也明确了优化医嘱集、简化管理流程和经常对医护人员进行教育以提高患者安全的必要性。
{"title":"Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa","authors":"Krystof Stanek MD , Mohammad T. Hussain MD , Aaron C. Spaulding PhD , Shalmali Borkar MD, MPH , Marwan E. Shaikh MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate prescribing practices for the anti-Xa reversal agent, andexanet alfa, to identify challenges in ordering and administering this medication, and to offer recommendations to improve patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study reviewed all adult patients treated with andexanet alfa (AA) at a single institution between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. We identified ordering and administration benchmarks based on recommendations from previous clinical trials on AA. We then reviewed these medical records to determine compliance with these benchmarks. We also collected data related to thrombotic complications and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-two AA dosing sets (loading and infusion dose) were given to 20 patients. Eight (36%) dosing sets met our ordering benchmarks regarding appropriate dose, time since last direct oral anticoagulants, urgency of administration, and documentation. Three (14%) dosing sets met the administrative benchmarks of being started within 30 minutes of the initial order, and 13 (59%) dosing sets had timely infusion of the infusion dose after the loading dose. No dosing set met all our administration benchmarks. There was 1 thrombotic event within 24 hours of the correct AA dose and 1 potential death related to AA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights challenges in ordering and administering AA at our institution and brings awareness to potential similar concerns at other institutions. These challenges also identified the need for optimized order sets, a streamlined administration process, and frequent provider education to improve patient safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 407-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000134/pdfft?md5=0798b850a649b22639f8402e72ce6e3f&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000134-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.006
Shravya Vinnakota MBBS , Alex D. Tarabochia MD , Nicholas Y. Tan MD, MS , William R. Miranda MD , Lawrence J. Sinak MD , Nandan S. Anavekar MBBCh , Omar Abu Saleh MD , Gabor Bagameri MD , Courtney E. Bennett DO
Objective
To review the salient features of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in patients with disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera (MC) infections after exposure to contaminated heater-cooler units during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Patients and Methods
Twelve patients with confirmed MC infection were retrospectively identified after a review from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2021. The electronic medical records were examined with a focus on transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT.
Results
Three (27.3%) patients had diagnostic findings of endocarditis on transthoracic echocardiography, with most patients having nonspecific abnormalities including elevated prosthetic valve gradients or prosthetic leaflet thickening. Transesophageal echocardiography identified 4 (36.7%) patients with vegetations and 3 (27.3%) with aortic root abscess or pseudoaneurysm, with more common findings such as mild aortic root or prosthetic leaflet thickening. Six (50%) patients underwent cardiac CT imaging, which found aortic root pseudoaneurysms or abscesses, prosthetic ring dehiscence, and leaflet thickening. Three (25%) patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating prosthetic valve vegetations, leaflet thickening, and abnormal myocardial delayed enhancement in a noncoronary distribution, suggesting myocarditis. Ten (83%) patients underwent positron emission tomography-CT, 4 (40%) had an abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake around the cardiac prosthetic material, and 7 (70%) had a fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in other organs, suggesting concomitant multiorgan involvement.
Conclusion
Multimodality cardiovascular imaging is central to the management of patients with disseminated MC and can help establish a preliminary diagnosis while awaiting confirmatory microbiological data, potentially reducing the time to diagnosis. Imaging findings are subtle and atypical, not always meeting classically modified Duke’s criteria for infectious endocarditis. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for the disease and a low threshold for repeat imaging when initial testing is equivocal.
{"title":"Multimodal Imaging in Mycobacterium Chimaera Cardiovascular Infections: The Mayo Clinic Experience","authors":"Shravya Vinnakota MBBS , Alex D. Tarabochia MD , Nicholas Y. Tan MD, MS , William R. Miranda MD , Lawrence J. Sinak MD , Nandan S. Anavekar MBBCh , Omar Abu Saleh MD , Gabor Bagameri MD , Courtney E. Bennett DO","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To review the salient features of multimodality cardiovascular imaging in patients with disseminated <em>Mycobacterium chimaera</em> (MC) infections after exposure to contaminated heater-cooler units during cardiopulmonary bypass.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Twelve patients with confirmed MC infection were retrospectively identified after a review from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2021. The electronic medical records were examined with a focus on transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography-CT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three (27.3%) patients had diagnostic findings of endocarditis on transthoracic echocardiography, with most patients having nonspecific abnormalities including elevated prosthetic valve gradients or prosthetic leaflet thickening. Transesophageal echocardiography identified 4 (36.7%) patients with vegetations and 3 (27.3%) with aortic root abscess or pseudoaneurysm, with more common findings such as mild aortic root or prosthetic leaflet thickening. Six (50%) patients underwent cardiac CT imaging, which found aortic root pseudoaneurysms or abscesses, prosthetic ring dehiscence, and leaflet thickening. Three (25%) patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating prosthetic valve vegetations, leaflet thickening, and abnormal myocardial delayed enhancement in a noncoronary distribution, suggesting myocarditis. Ten (83%) patients underwent positron emission tomography-CT, 4 (40%) had an abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake around the cardiac prosthetic material, and 7 (70%) had a fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in other organs, suggesting concomitant multiorgan involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multimodality cardiovascular imaging is central to the management of patients with disseminated MC and can help establish a preliminary diagnosis while awaiting confirmatory microbiological data, potentially reducing the time to diagnosis. Imaging findings are subtle and atypical, not always meeting classically modified Duke’s criteria for infectious endocarditis. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for the disease and a low threshold for repeat imaging when initial testing is equivocal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 396-405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000389/pdfft?md5=e415a91f7884077294b492224abb29fa&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000389-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141595657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.06.001
Donald E. Casey Jr. MD, MPH, MBA , Alexander J. Blood MD, MSc , Stephen D. Persell MD, MPH , Daniel Pohlman MD , Jeff D. Williamson MD, MHS
An estimated 45% of adult Americans currently have high blood pressure (HBP). Effective blood pressure (BP) control is essential for preventing major adverse events from cardiovascular and other vascular-related diseases, such as chronic kidney disease, stroke and dementia. A large and growing number of medical professional societies, health care organizations, and governmental agencies have now endorsed a clinical practice guideline-based target for adequate control of HBP to a systolic BP of less than 130 mm Hg. However, adequate BP control to this goal has been recently estimated to be as low as 30%. The first and most important steps to guide effective BP control include accurate, standardized BP measurement and formal assessment of overall atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. In addition to appropriate pharmacologic treatment, optimal BP management must also include multifaceted guideline-directed lifestyle modifications. High-quality evidence now supports effective uniform HBP control that is consistently achievable for most of people from diverse backgrounds. This can be accomplished through identification and prioritization of social determinants of health enabled by shared decision making that is delivered via team-based care. Such integrated approaches can have a substantial impact for simultaneously reducing several major modifiable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors. Hence, moving the “Big Needle” of improved overall cardiovascular, kidney, and brain health of the US population must no longer be solely relegated to primary care and will require a major and coordinated reprioritization of capital and evidence-based human resource allocations by all health care stakeholder organizations.
{"title":"What Constitutes Adequate Control of High Blood Pressure? Current Considerations","authors":"Donald E. Casey Jr. MD, MPH, MBA , Alexander J. Blood MD, MSc , Stephen D. Persell MD, MPH , Daniel Pohlman MD , Jeff D. Williamson MD, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.06.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An estimated 45% of adult Americans currently have high blood pressure (HBP). Effective blood pressure (BP) control is essential for preventing major adverse events from cardiovascular and other vascular-related diseases, such as chronic kidney disease, stroke and dementia. A large and growing number of medical professional societies, health care organizations, and governmental agencies have now endorsed a clinical practice guideline-based target for adequate control of HBP to a systolic BP of less than 130 mm Hg. However, adequate BP control to this goal has been recently estimated to be as low as 30%. The first and most important steps to guide effective BP control include accurate, standardized BP measurement and formal assessment of overall atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. In addition to appropriate pharmacologic treatment, optimal BP management must also include multifaceted guideline-directed lifestyle modifications. High-quality evidence now supports effective uniform HBP control that is consistently achievable for most of people from diverse backgrounds. This can be accomplished through identification and prioritization of social determinants of health enabled by shared decision making that is delivered via team-based care. Such integrated approaches can have a substantial impact for simultaneously reducing several major modifiable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors. Hence, moving the “Big Needle” of improved overall cardiovascular, kidney, and brain health of the US population must no longer be solely relegated to primary care and will require a major and coordinated reprioritization of capital and evidence-based human resource allocations by all health care stakeholder organizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 384-395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000377/pdfft?md5=0a4bf6d7fbd90fcf31e1a47f2f7e4386&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000377-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141540331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-03DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.005
Michal M. Reid MD , Jack J. Amja MD , Irene T. Riestra Guiance MD , Rupesh R. Andani MBBS , Robert A. Vierkant MS , Amit Goyal MD , Janani S. Reisenauer MD
Objective
To perform a retrospective, multicenter, external validation of the Cleveland Clinic malignancy probability prediction model for incidental pulmonary nodules.
Patients and Methods
From July 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, we identified 296 patients who underwent tissue acquisition at Mayo Clinic (MC) (n=198) and Loyola University Medical Center (n=98) with histopathology indicating malignant (n=195) or benign (n=101). Data was collected at initial radiographic identification (point 1) and at the time of intervention (point 2). Point 3 represented the most recent data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for each model per time point. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the predicted and observed rates of malignancy.
Results
The areas under the receiver operating characteristics at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the MC model were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic model (CCM) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. The mean ± SD estimated probability for malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs) at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the CCM was 64.2±25.9, 65.8±24.0, and 64.7±24.4, which resembled the overall proportion of malignant PNs (66%). The mean estimated probability of malignancy for the MC model at each time point was 38.3±27.4, 36.2±24.4, and 42.1±27.3, substantially lower than the observed proportion of malignancies.
Conclusion
The CCM found discrimination similar to its internal validation and good calibration. The CCM can be used to augment clinical and shared decision-making when evaluating high-risk PNs.
患者和方法从 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日,我们确定了在梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic,MC)(n=198)和洛约拉大学医学中心(Loyola University Medical Center,Loyola University Medical Center)(n=98)进行组织采集的 296 例患者,这些患者的组织病理学显示为恶性(n=195)或良性(n=101)。数据收集于最初的放射学鉴定(第1点)和干预时(第2点)。第 3 点代表最新数据。每个模型在每个时间点的接收者操作特征下的面积都被计算出来。结果MC模型在时间点1、2和3的受体操作特征下面积分别为0.67(95% CI,0.61-0.74)、0.67(95% CI,0.58-0.77)和0.70(95% CI,0.63-0.76)。克利夫兰诊所模型(CCM)分别为 0.68(95% CI,0.61-0.74)、0.75(95% CI,0.65-0.84)和 0.72(95% CI,0.66-0.78)。CCM在时间点1、2和3的恶性肺结节(PNs)估计概率的平均值(±SD)分别为64.2±25.9、65.8±24.0和64.7±24.4,与恶性PNs的总体比例(66%)相似。MC 模型在每个时间点的平均恶性肿瘤估计概率分别为 38.3±27.4、36.2±24.4 和 42.1±27.3,大大低于观察到的恶性肿瘤比例。在评估高风险 PN 时,CCM 可用于辅助临床和共同决策。
{"title":"A Retrospective External Validation of the Cleveland Clinic Malignancy Probability Prediction Model for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules","authors":"Michal M. Reid MD , Jack J. Amja MD , Irene T. Riestra Guiance MD , Rupesh R. Andani MBBS , Robert A. Vierkant MS , Amit Goyal MD , Janani S. Reisenauer MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To perform a retrospective, multicenter, external validation of the Cleveland Clinic malignancy probability prediction model for incidental pulmonary nodules.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>From July 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, we identified 296 patients who underwent tissue acquisition at Mayo Clinic (MC) (n=198) and Loyola University Medical Center (n=98) with histopathology indicating malignant (n=195) or benign (n=101). Data was collected at initial radiographic identification (point 1) and at the time of intervention (point 2). Point 3 represented the most recent data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for each model per time point. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the predicted and observed rates of malignancy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The areas under the receiver operating characteristics at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the MC model were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic model (CCM) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. The mean ± SD estimated probability for malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs) at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the CCM was 64.2±25.9, 65.8±24.0, and 64.7±24.4, which resembled the overall proportion of malignant PNs (66%). The mean estimated probability of malignancy for the MC model at each time point was 38.3±27.4, 36.2±24.4, and 42.1±27.3, substantially lower than the observed proportion of malignancies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The CCM found discrimination similar to its internal validation and good calibration. The CCM can be used to augment clinical and shared decision-making when evaluating high-risk PNs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 375-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000365/pdfft?md5=92d34d2a2f83aec8732ab6a8e112463c&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000365-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141540330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}