首页 > 最新文献

Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes最新文献

英文 中文
Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injections and Postoperative Infections After Lumbar or Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 术前硬膜外类固醇注射与腰椎或颈椎手术后感染:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.007
W. Michael Hooten MD , Nathan D. Eberhart , Fei Cao MD, PhD , Danielle J. Gerberi MLIS , Rajat N. Moman MD, MA , Salman Hirani MD

Objective

To determine the risk difference and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) for postoperative infections (POIs) associated with preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in adults undergoing lumbar or cervical spine surgery.

Methods

Comprehensive database searches were conducted from inception dates through December 2023. Inclusion criteria included all study designs involving adults receiving a preoperative ESI before lumbar or cervical decompression or fusion spine surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified tool developed for uncontrolled studies. The summary estimates of risk difference and the corresponding PIs were reported.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Preoperative ESIs within 1 month of lumbar spine decompression or fusion surgery were associated with a 0.6% and 2.31% greater risk of a POI, respectively. In adults ≥65 years of age, ESIs within 1 or 1-3 months of lumbar spine decompression or fusion surgery were associated with a 1.3% and 0.6% greater risk of a POI, respectively. Preoperative ESIs within 3 months of cervical spine fusion were not associated with an increased risk of a POI. The bounds of all corresponding 95% PIs were nonsignificant.

Conclusion

The observations of this study provide summary estimates of risk difference and 95% PIs, which could be used to support shared decision-making about the use of ESIs before cervical or lumbar spine surgery.

目的确定接受腰椎或颈椎手术的成年人术前硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)引起术后感染(POIs)的风险差异和95%预测区间(PIs)。方法从创建日期到2023年12月进行全面的数据库检索。纳入标准包括所有涉及成年人在腰椎或颈椎减压或融合脊柱手术前接受术前ESI的研究设计。使用为非对照研究开发的改良工具评估偏倚风险。报告了风险差异的汇总估计和相应的PI。结果共有12项研究纳入系统综述,其中9项纳入荟萃分析。腰椎减压或融合手术后1个月内的术前ESI与POI风险分别增加0.6%和2.31%相关。在≥65岁的成年人中,腰椎减压或融合手术后1个月或1-3个月内的ESI与POI的风险分别增加1.3%和0.6%。颈椎融合术后3个月内的术前ESI与POI风险增加无关。所有相应的95%PI的界限都不显著。结论本研究的观察结果提供了风险差异和95%PI的汇总估计,可用于支持在颈椎或腰椎手术前使用ESI的共同决策。
{"title":"Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injections and Postoperative Infections After Lumbar or Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"W. Michael Hooten MD ,&nbsp;Nathan D. Eberhart ,&nbsp;Fei Cao MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Danielle J. Gerberi MLIS ,&nbsp;Rajat N. Moman MD, MA ,&nbsp;Salman Hirani MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the risk difference and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) for postoperative infections (POIs) associated with preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) in adults undergoing lumbar or cervical spine surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Comprehensive database searches were conducted from inception dates through December 2023. Inclusion criteria included all study designs involving adults receiving a preoperative ESI before lumbar or cervical decompression or fusion spine surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified tool developed for uncontrolled studies. The summary estimates of risk difference and the corresponding PIs were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Preoperative ESIs within 1 month of lumbar spine decompression or fusion surgery were associated with a 0.6% and 2.31% greater risk of a POI, respectively. In adults ≥65 years of age, ESIs within 1 or 1-3 months of lumbar spine decompression or fusion surgery were associated with a 1.3% and 0.6% greater risk of a POI, respectively. Preoperative ESIs within 3 months of cervical spine fusion were not associated with an increased risk of a POI. The bounds of all corresponding 95% PIs were nonsignificant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The observations of this study provide summary estimates of risk difference and 95% PIs, which could be used to support shared decision-making about the use of ESIs before cervical or lumbar spine surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/ca/main.PMC10466430.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10138094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations Between Management Pathway and Opioid Prescriptions for Patients Entering the Emergency Department With Neck and Back Pain 颈背痛患者进入急诊科的管理途径与阿片类药物处方之间的关系。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.001
Maggie E. Horn DPT, MPH, PhD , Corey B. Simon DPT, PhD , Hui-Jie Lee PhD , Stephanie A. Eucker MD, PhD

Objective

To determine associations between post-emergency department (ED) management pathways and downstream opioid prescriptions in patients seeking care for incident neck and/or back pain.

Patients and Methods

We identified patients seeking first-time ED care for neck and/or back pain from January 1, 2013, through November 6, 2017. We reported demographic characteristics and opioid prescriptions across management pathways using descriptive statistics and assessed the relative risk of any opioid prescription 12 months post-ED visit among 5 different post-ED management pathways using Poisson regression adjusted for patient demographic characteristics.

Results

Within 12 months after the index ED visit, 58.0% (n=10,949) were prescribed an opioid, with most patients prescribed an opioid within the first week (average daily morphine milligram equivalents of 6.8 mg (SD 9.6 mg). The morphine milligram equivalents decreased to 0.7 mg (SD 8.2 mg) by week 4 and remained consistently less than 1 mg between week 4 and 12 months. Compared with the ED to primary care provider pathway, the relative risk of opioid prescription between 7 days and 12 months after the index ED visit was similar for the ED to physical therapy pathway, higher for both the ED to hospital admission or repeat ED visit pathway (30% increase; relative risk (RR), 1.3; 95% CI, 1.17-1.44) and the ED to specialist pathway (19% increase; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33), and lower in the ED with no follow-up visits pathway (41% decrease; RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.65).

Conclusion

In general, more conservative care was associated with lower opioid prescription rates, and escalated care was associated with higher opioid prescription rates.

目的:确定因颈部和/或背部疼痛寻求治疗的患者急诊科(ED)后管理途径与下游阿片类药物处方之间的关系。患者和方法:我们确定了2013年1月1日至2017年11月6日期间首次因颈部和/或背部疼痛寻求急诊治疗的患者。我们使用描述性统计报告了不同管理途径的人口统计学特征和阿片类药物处方,并使用根据患者人口统计学特征调整的泊松回归评估了5种不同ED后管理途径中ED访视后12个月任何阿片类药处方的相对风险。结果:在指数ED访视后的12个月内,58.0%(n=10949)的患者服用了阿片类药物,大多数患者在第一周内服用了阿片剂(平均每日吗啡毫克当量为6.8 mg(SD 9.6 mg))。吗啡毫克当量在第4周降至0.7 mg(标准差8.2 mg),在第4周到12个月之间始终低于1 mg。与ED到初级保健提供者途径相比,指数ED访视后7天至12个月内,ED到物理治疗途径的阿片类药物处方的相对风险相似,ED到住院或重复ED访视途径的相对风险更高(增加30%;相对风险(RR),1.3;95%CI,1.17-1.44)和ED转专科途径(增加19%;RR,1.19;95%CI,1.07-1.33),而在没有随访途径的ED中则更低(减少41%;RR,0.59;95%CI,0.54-0.65)。
{"title":"Associations Between Management Pathway and Opioid Prescriptions for Patients Entering the Emergency Department With Neck and Back Pain","authors":"Maggie E. Horn DPT, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Corey B. Simon DPT, PhD ,&nbsp;Hui-Jie Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Eucker MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine associations between post-emergency department (ED) management pathways and downstream opioid prescriptions in patients seeking care for incident neck and/or back pain.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We identified patients seeking first-time ED care for neck and/or back pain from January 1, 2013, through November 6, 2017. We reported demographic characteristics and opioid prescriptions across management pathways using descriptive statistics and assessed the relative risk of any opioid prescription 12 months post-ED visit among 5 different post-ED management pathways using Poisson regression adjusted for patient demographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Within 12 months after the index ED visit, 58.0% (n=10,949) were prescribed an opioid, with most patients prescribed an opioid within the first week (average daily morphine milligram equivalents of 6.8 mg (SD 9.6 mg). The morphine milligram equivalents decreased to 0.7 mg (SD 8.2 mg) by week 4 and remained consistently less than 1 mg between week 4 and 12 months. Compared with the ED to primary care provider pathway, the relative risk of opioid prescription between 7 days and 12 months after the index ED visit was similar for the ED to physical therapy pathway, higher for both the ED to hospital admission or repeat ED visit pathway (30% increase; relative risk (RR), 1.3; 95% CI, 1.17-1.44) and the ED to specialist pathway (19% increase; RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33), and lower in the ED with no follow-up visits pathway (41% decrease; RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.65).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In general, more conservative care was associated with lower opioid prescription rates, and escalated care was associated with higher opioid prescription rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/8d/main.PMC10568062.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41242723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world Duration of Use and Dosing Frequency of Daratumumab in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the United States Daratumumab在美国多发性骨髓瘤患者中的真实使用期限和给药频率。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.001
Rafael Fonseca MD , Eric E. Chinaeke PhD , Niodita Gupta-Werner MD, MPH, PhD , Alex Z. Fu PhD , Shuchita Kaila PhD

Daratumumab (DARA) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved as a combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and as monotherapy and combination therapy for relapsed or refractory MM cases. We assessed the length of DARA use across lines of therapy and the probabilities of treatment discontinuation in patients with MM in the real-world. We used the deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from Optum to identify patients with MM (n=2124) who received DARA-containing treatment between November 1, 2015 and March 31, 2021 in the United States. Patients were excluded if they had received a stem cell transplant. The duration of DARA use was defined as the time interval between the first initiation and discontinuation of DARA as a time-to-event outcome using the Kaplan-Meier method. A gap of more than 60 days between 2 consequent DARA claim dates was defined as DARA discontinuation. The median duration of continuous DARA use was 16.6 months. By 24 months, 33.1% of patients remained on DARA treatment. In a subgroup analysis of patients with 12 months or more continuous insurance coverage (n=1246), the median length of DARA use was 24.7 months; by 24 months, 51.8% remained on DARA treatment. The dose adherence ratios (observed DARA doses relative to the label) were close to 1.0, particularly among patients with longer follow-up, indicating that real-world DARA dosing frequency was similar to that on the approved label. In summary, this real-world analysis reported that the median duration of continuous DARA use is 16.6 months, with high dosing adherence in patients who have MM.

Daratumumab(DARA)是一种抗CD38单克隆抗体,被批准作为新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的联合疗法,以及复发或难治性MM病例的单一疗法和联合疗法。我们评估了DARA在不同治疗线中的使用时间,以及现实世界中MM患者中断治疗的概率。我们使用Optum的已识别临床数据集市数据库来识别2015年11月1日至2021年3月31日期间在美国接受含DARA治疗的MM患者(n=2124)。如果患者接受了干细胞移植,则将其排除在外。DARA使用的持续时间定义为首次启动和停止DARA之间的时间间隔,作为使用Kaplan-Meier方法的时间-事件结果。两次DARA索赔日期之间的间隔超过60天被定义为DARA中止。DARA持续使用的中位持续时间为16.6个月。到24个月时,33.1%的患者仍在接受DARA治疗。在对连续保险期为12个月或12个月以上的患者(n=1246)进行的亚组分析中,DARA使用的中位时间为24.7个月;到24个月,51.8%的患者仍在接受DARA治疗。剂量依从性比率(观察到的DARA剂量相对于标签)接近1.0,尤其是在随访时间较长的患者中,这表明真实世界的DARA给药频率与批准标签上的相似。总之,这项真实世界的分析报告称,连续使用DARA的中位持续时间为16.6个月,MM患者的给药依从性很高。
{"title":"Real-world Duration of Use and Dosing Frequency of Daratumumab in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the United States","authors":"Rafael Fonseca MD ,&nbsp;Eric E. Chinaeke PhD ,&nbsp;Niodita Gupta-Werner MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Alex Z. Fu PhD ,&nbsp;Shuchita Kaila PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Daratumumab (DARA) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved as a combination therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and as monotherapy and combination therapy for relapsed or refractory MM cases. We assessed the length of DARA use across lines of therapy and the probabilities of treatment discontinuation in patients with MM in the real-world. We used the deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from Optum to identify patients with MM (n=2124) who received DARA-containing treatment between November 1, 2015 and March 31, 2021 in the United States. Patients were excluded if they had received a stem cell transplant. The duration of DARA use was defined as the time interval between the first initiation and discontinuation of DARA as a time-to-event outcome using the Kaplan-Meier method. A gap of more than 60 days between 2 consequent DARA claim dates was defined as DARA discontinuation. The median duration of continuous DARA use was 16.6 months. By 24 months, 33.1% of patients remained on DARA treatment. In a subgroup analysis of patients with 12 months or more continuous insurance coverage (n=1246), the median length of DARA use was 24.7 months; by 24 months, 51.8% remained on DARA treatment. The dose adherence ratios (observed DARA doses relative to the label) were close to 1.0, particularly among patients with longer follow-up, indicating that real-world DARA dosing frequency was similar to that on the approved label. In summary, this real-world analysis reported that the median duration of continuous DARA use is 16.6 months, with high dosing adherence in patients who have MM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/e8/main.PMC10507479.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41161674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Primary Care Risk Mitigation Visits and Nonelective Emergency Department Visits in Patients Using Long-term Opioid Therapy 长期阿片类药物治疗患者的初级保健风险缓解就诊和非选择性急诊就诊的相关性
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.008
Nancy V. Koch MD , Richard J. Butterfield III MA

Objective

To determine risk factors for nonelective emergency department visits (NEDVs) and whether primary care visits incorporating risk mitigation tools prevented NEDVs among patients using long-term opioid therapy (LOT).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively searched the electronic health records at Mayo Clinic primary care outpatient practices in Arizona and Florida in all of 2018 and 2019 for the records of individual adult patients using LOT. Patient and clinician demographic characteristics and patient risk factors were compared between patients with and without risk mitigation visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for NEDVs.

Results

Among 457 patients using LOT identified during the study period, most were women (n=266, 58.2%), and the median age was 69 years. Long-term opioid therapy risk mitigation visits were performed equally by family medicine and internal medicine clinicians and by a significantly higher proportion of Florida clinicians than Arizona clinicians (87.0% vs 70.5%; P<.001). Older age, falls, and mental health care utilization all increased the risk of NEDVs. Risk mitigation visits were protective against NEDVs (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.89; P=.01) after adjustment for older age, falls, and mental health care utilization.

Conclusion

Risk mitigation visits are effective in preventing NEDVs, and all patients using LOT should have such visits when possible.

目的确定非选择性急诊就诊(NEDVs)的风险因素,以及纳入风险缓解工具的初级保健就诊是否能在使用长期阿片类药物治疗(LOT)的患者中预防NEDVs。患者和方法我们回顾性检索了2018年和2019年亚利桑那州和佛罗里达州梅奥诊所初级保健门诊的电子健康记录用于使用LOT的个体成年患者的记录。比较了有和没有风险缓解访视的患者和临床医生的人口统计学特征以及患者风险因素。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定NEDVs的风险因素。结果在研究期间确定的457名使用LOT的患者中,大多数是女性(n=266,58.2%),中位年龄为69岁。家庭医学和内科临床医生平均进行了长期阿片类药物治疗风险缓解访视,佛罗里达州临床医生的比例明显高于亚利桑那州临床医生(87.0%对70.5%;P<;.001)。年龄较大、跌倒和心理健康护理使用均增加了NEDVs的风险。在对年龄、跌倒和心理健康护理利用率进行调整后,风险缓解访视对NEDVs具有保护作用(比值比,0.56;95%可信区间,0.35-0.89;P=0.01)。结论风险缓解访视可有效预防NEDVs,所有使用LOT的患者应尽可能进行此类访视。
{"title":"Association of Primary Care Risk Mitigation Visits and Nonelective Emergency Department Visits in Patients Using Long-term Opioid Therapy","authors":"Nancy V. Koch MD ,&nbsp;Richard J. Butterfield III MA","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine risk factors for nonelective emergency department visits <strong>(</strong>NEDVs) and whether primary care visits incorporating risk mitigation tools prevented NEDVs among patients using long-term opioid therapy (LOT).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively searched the electronic health records at Mayo Clinic primary care outpatient practices in Arizona and Florida in all of 2018 and 2019 for the records of individual adult patients using LOT. Patient and clinician demographic characteristics and patient risk factors were compared between patients with and without risk mitigation visits. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for NEDVs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 457 patients using LOT identified during the study period, most were women (n=266, 58.2%), and the median age was 69 years. Long-term opioid therapy risk mitigation visits were performed equally by family medicine and internal medicine clinicians and by a significantly higher proportion of Florida clinicians than Arizona clinicians (87.0% vs 70.5%; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). Older age, falls, and mental health care utilization all increased the risk of NEDVs. Risk mitigation visits were protective against NEDVs (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.89; <em>P</em>=.01) after adjustment for older age, falls, and mental health care utilization.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Risk mitigation visits are effective in preventing NEDVs, and all patients using LOT should have such visits when possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/52/main.PMC10466427.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10193633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Age and Variant Time Period on Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients 年龄和变异时间段对2019年住院冠状病毒病患者临床表现和结果的影响。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.004
Pratyaksh K. Srivastava MD , Alexandra M. Klomhaus PhD , David M. Tehrani MD , Gregg C. Fonarow MD , Boback Ziaeian MD, PhD , Pooja S. Desai MD , Asim Rafique MD , James de Lemos MD , Rushi V. Parikh MD , Eric H. Yang MD

Objective

To evaluate the impact of age and COVID-19 variant time period on morbidity and mortality among those hospitalized with COVID-19.

Patients and Methods

Patients from the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines COVID-19 cardiovascular disease registry (January 20, 2020-February 14, 2022) were divided into groups based on whether they presented during periods of wild type/alpha, delta, or omicron predominance. They were further subdivided by age (young: 18-40 years; older: more than 40 years), and characteristics and outcomes were compared.

Results

The cohort consisted of 45,421 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (wild type/alpha period: 41,426, delta period: 3349, and omicron period: 646). Among young patients (18-40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3) when compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), MACE (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) when compared with wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during omicron associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) when compared with wild type/alpha.

Conclusion

Among hospitalized adults with COVID-19, presentation during a time of delta predominance was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19, MACE, and in-hospital mortality compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (aged more than 40 years), presentation during omicron was associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality compared with wild type/alpha.

目的:评估年龄和新冠肺炎变异时间段对新冠肺炎住院患者发病率和死亡率的影响类型/α、德尔塔或奥密克戎优势。他们按年龄进一步细分(年轻人:18-40岁;老年人:40岁以上),并对特征和结果进行比较。结果:该队列由45421名住院新冠肺炎患者组成(野生型/α期:41426,德尔塔期:3349,奥密克戎期:646)。在年轻患者(18-40岁)中,与野生型/α期相比,德尔塔期的表现与严重新冠肺炎(OR,1.6;95%CI,1.3-2.1)、主要心血管不良事件(MACE)(OR,1.8;95%CI(1.3-2.5))和住院死亡率(OR,2.2;95%CI)(1.5-3.3)的发病率增加有关。在老年患者(40岁以上)中,与野生型/α相比,德尔塔期间的表现与严重新冠肺炎(OR,1.2;95%CI,1.1-1.3)、MACE(OR,1.5;95%CI:1.4-1.7)和住院死亡率(OR,1.4;95%CI;1.3-1.6)的发病率增加相关。在老年患者(40岁以上)中,与野生型/α相比,奥密克戎期间的表现与严重新冠肺炎(OR,0.7;95%CI,0.5-0.9)和住院死亡率(OR,0.6;95%CI(0.5-0.9)降低相关。结论:在新冠肺炎住院成人中,以及与野生型/α期间的表现相比的住院死亡率。在老年患者(年龄超过40岁)中,与野生型/α相比,奥密克戎期间的表现与严重新冠肺炎和住院死亡率的降低有关。
{"title":"Impact of Age and Variant Time Period on Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients","authors":"Pratyaksh K. Srivastava MD ,&nbsp;Alexandra M. Klomhaus PhD ,&nbsp;David M. Tehrani MD ,&nbsp;Gregg C. Fonarow MD ,&nbsp;Boback Ziaeian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Pooja S. Desai MD ,&nbsp;Asim Rafique MD ,&nbsp;James de Lemos MD ,&nbsp;Rushi V. Parikh MD ,&nbsp;Eric H. Yang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the impact of age and COVID-19 variant time period on morbidity and mortality among those hospitalized with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Patients from the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines COVID-19 cardiovascular disease registry (January 20, 2020-February 14, 2022) were divided into groups based on whether they presented during periods of wild type/alpha, delta, or omicron predominance. They were further subdivided by age (young: 18-40 years; older: more than 40 years), and characteristics and outcomes were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The cohort consisted of 45,421 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (wild type/alpha period: 41,426, delta period: 3349, and omicron period: 646). Among young patients (18-40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3) when compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during delta was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3), MACE (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) when compared with wild type/alpha. Among older patients (more than 40 years), presentation during omicron associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) when compared with wild type/alpha.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among hospitalized adults with COVID-19, presentation during a time of delta predominance was associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19, MACE, and in-hospital mortality compared with presentation during wild type/alpha. Among older patients (aged more than 40 years), presentation during omicron was associated with decreased odds of severe COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality compared with wild type/alpha.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507578/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41176040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes 糖尿病患者肾脏健康评估方法的实施和有效性。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.002
Silvia Ferrè PhD , Amy Storfer-Isser PhD , Kelsy Kinderknecht MS , Elizabeth Montgomery BS , Miriam Godwin MS , Ashby Andrews MA, MS , Stephan Dunning MBA , Mary Barton MD , Dan Roman BS , John Cuddeback MD, PhD , Nikita Stempniewicz MS , Chi D. Chu MD , Delphine S. Tuot MD , Joseph A. Vassalotti MD

Objective

To evaluate the fulfillment and validity of the kidney health evaluation for people with diabetes (KED) Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measure.

Patients and Methods

Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was used to identify the nationally distributed US population aged 18 years and older, with diabetes, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. The OLDW includes deidentified medical, pharmacy, laboratory, and electronic health record (EHR) data. The KED fulfillment was defined in 2017 as both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing within the measurement year. The KED validity was assessed using bivariate analyses of KED fulfillment with diabetes care measures in 2017 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018.

Results

Among eligible 5,635,619 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 736,875 Medicare advantage (MA) beneficiaries, and 660,987 commercial patients, KED fulfillment was 32.2%, 38.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. Albuminuria testing limited KED fulfillment with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing (<40%) and eGFR testing (>90%). The KED fulfillment was positively associated with receipt of diabetes care in 2017, CKD diagnosis in 2018, and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. The KED fulfillment trended lower for Black race, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status, low neighborhood income, and low education status.

Conclusion

Less than 40% of adults with diabetes received guideline-recommended testing for CKD in 2017. Routine KED was associated with diabetes care and evidence-based CKD interventions. Increasing guideline-recommended testing for CKD among people with diabetes should lead to timely and equitable CKD detection and treatment.

目的:评价糖尿病患者肾脏健康评估(KED)医疗保健有效性数据集(HEDIS)测量的实现性和有效性。患者和方法:Optum Labs数据仓库(OLDW)用于识别2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间全国分布的18岁及以上糖尿病美国人群。OLDW包括未识别的医疗、药房、实验室和电子健康记录(EHR)数据。KED的实现在2017年被定义为测量年内的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和尿白蛋白-肌酐比率测试。使用2017年糖尿病护理措施、2018年慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)诊断和循证肾脏保护干预措施的KED实现情况的双变量分析来评估KED的有效性。结果:在符合条件的5635619名医疗保险服务费受益人、736875名医疗保险优势(MA)受益人和660987名商业患者中,KED实现率分别为32.2%、38.7%,分别为37.7%。白蛋白尿检测限制了尿白蛋白-肌酸酐比率检测(90%)的KED实现。KED的完成与2017年接受糖尿病护理、2018年CKD诊断和2018年循证肾脏保护干预呈正相关。黑人种族、联邦医疗保险医疗补助双重资格、低社区收入和低教育水平的KED实现率呈下降趋势。结论:2017年,只有不到40%的糖尿病成年人接受了指南建议的CKD检测。常规KED与糖尿病护理和循证CKD干预相关。增加指南建议的糖尿病患者CKD检测应导致及时、公平的CKD检测和治疗。
{"title":"Fulfillment and Validity of the Kidney Health Evaluation Measure for People with Diabetes","authors":"Silvia Ferrè PhD ,&nbsp;Amy Storfer-Isser PhD ,&nbsp;Kelsy Kinderknecht MS ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Montgomery BS ,&nbsp;Miriam Godwin MS ,&nbsp;Ashby Andrews MA, MS ,&nbsp;Stephan Dunning MBA ,&nbsp;Mary Barton MD ,&nbsp;Dan Roman BS ,&nbsp;John Cuddeback MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nikita Stempniewicz MS ,&nbsp;Chi D. Chu MD ,&nbsp;Delphine S. Tuot MD ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Vassalotti MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the fulfillment and validity of the kidney health evaluation for people with diabetes (KED) Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measure.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was used to identify the nationally distributed US population aged 18 years and older, with diabetes, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. The OLDW includes deidentified medical, pharmacy, laboratory, and electronic health record (EHR) data. The KED fulfillment was defined in 2017 as both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing within the measurement year. The KED validity was assessed using bivariate analyses of KED fulfillment with diabetes care measures in 2017 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnosis and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among eligible 5,635,619 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 736,875 Medicare advantage (MA) beneficiaries, and 660,987 commercial patients, KED fulfillment was 32.2%, 38.7%, and 37.7%, respectively. Albuminuria testing limited KED fulfillment with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio testing (&lt;40%) and eGFR testing (&gt;90%). The KED fulfillment was positively associated with receipt of diabetes care in 2017, CKD diagnosis in 2018, and evidence-based kidney protective interventions in 2018. The KED fulfillment trended lower for Black race, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status, low neighborhood income, and low education status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Less than 40% of adults with diabetes received guideline-recommended testing for CKD in 2017. Routine KED was associated with diabetes care and evidence-based CKD interventions. Increasing guideline-recommended testing for CKD among people with diabetes should lead to timely and equitable CKD detection and treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10184969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In-Hospital Versus Out-of-Hospital Stroke Onset Comparison of Process Metrics in a Community Primary Stroke Center 社区原发性卒中中心过程指标的院内与院外卒中发病比较。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.003
Felix E. Chukwudelunzu MD, MBA , Bart Demaerschalk MD, MSc , Leonardo Fugoso MD , Emeka Amadi MBBS, MD , Donn Dexter MD , Angela Gullicksrud RN , Clinton Hagen MS

Objective

To examine in-hospital stroke onset metrics and outcomes, quality of care, and mortality compared with out-of-hospital stroke in a single community-based primary stroke center.

Patients and Methods

Medical records of in-hospital stroke onset were compared with out-of-hospital stroke onset alert data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. Time-sensitive stroke process metric data were collected for each incident stroke alert. The primary focus of interest was the time-sensitive stroke quality metrics. Secondary focus pertained to thrombolysis treatment or complications, and mortality. Descriptive and univariable statistical analyses were applied. Kruskal-Wallis and χ2 tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between prespecified groups. The statistical significance was set at α=0.05.

Results

The out-of-hospital group reported a more favorable response to time-sensitive stroke process metrics than the in-hospital group, as measured by median stroke team response time (15.0 vs 26.0 minutes; P≤.0001) and median head computed tomography scan completion time (12.0 vs 41.0 minutes; P=.0001). There was no difference in the stroke alert time between the 2 groups (14.0 vs 8.0 minutes; P=.089). Longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days; P=.004) and increased hospital mortality (19.3% vs 7.4%; P=.0032) were observed for the in-hospital group.

Conclusions

The key findings in this study were that time-sensitive stroke process metrics and stroke outcome measures were superior for the out-of-hospital groups compared with the in-hospital groups. Focusing on improving time-sensitive stroke process metrics may improve outcomes in the in-hospital stroke cohort.

目的:在一个基于社区的原发性卒中中心,与院外卒中相比,检查院内卒中发病指标和结果、护理质量和死亡率。患者和方法:将2013年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间住院中风发作的医疗记录与院外中风发作警报数据进行比较。收集每个事件中风警报的时间敏感的中风过程度量数据。感兴趣的主要焦点是时间敏感的笔划质量指标。次要关注点与溶栓治疗或并发症和死亡率有关。采用描述性和单变量统计分析。Kruskal-Wallis和χ2检验用于比较预先指定组之间的中值和分类数据。结果:院外组对时间敏感的卒中过程指标的反应比院内组更有利,通过中位卒中团队反应时间(15.0 vs 26.0分钟;P≤.0001)和中位头部计算机断层扫描完成时间(12.0 vs 41.0分钟;P=0.001)测量。两组之间的卒中警报时间没有差异(14.0 vs 8.0分钟;P=0.089)。观察到住院时间更长(4 vs 3天;P=0.004)和住院死亡率增加(19.3%vs 7.4%;P=0.032)为住院组。结论:本研究的关键发现是,与住院组相比,院外组的时间敏感性卒中过程指标和卒中结果指标更优越。专注于改善对时间敏感的中风过程指标可能会改善住院中风队列的结果。
{"title":"In-Hospital Versus Out-of-Hospital Stroke Onset Comparison of Process Metrics in a Community Primary Stroke Center","authors":"Felix E. Chukwudelunzu MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Bart Demaerschalk MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Leonardo Fugoso MD ,&nbsp;Emeka Amadi MBBS, MD ,&nbsp;Donn Dexter MD ,&nbsp;Angela Gullicksrud RN ,&nbsp;Clinton Hagen MS","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine in-hospital stroke onset metrics and outcomes, quality of care, and mortality compared with out-of-hospital stroke in a single community-based primary stroke center.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Medical records of in-hospital stroke onset were compared with out-of-hospital stroke onset alert data between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. Time-sensitive stroke process metric data were collected for each incident stroke alert. The primary focus of interest was the time-sensitive stroke quality metrics. Secondary focus pertained to thrombolysis treatment or complications, and mortality. Descriptive and univariable statistical analyses were applied. Kruskal-Wallis and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between prespecified groups. The statistical significance was set at α=0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The out-of-hospital group reported a more favorable response to time-sensitive stroke process metrics than the in-hospital group, as measured by median stroke team response time (15.0 vs 26.0 minutes; <em>P</em>≤.0001) and median head computed tomography scan completion time (12.0 vs 41.0 minutes; <em>P</em>=.0001). There was no difference in the stroke alert time between the 2 groups (14.0 vs 8.0 minutes; <em>P</em>=.089). Longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days; <em>P</em>=.004) and increased hospital mortality (19.3% vs 7.4%; <em>P</em>=.0032) were observed for the in-hospital group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The key findings in this study were that time-sensitive stroke process metrics and stroke outcome measures were superior for the out-of-hospital groups compared with the in-hospital groups. Focusing on improving time-sensitive stroke process metrics may improve outcomes in the in-hospital stroke cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/2c/main.PMC10504462.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10279509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Home-Based Physical Activity Program With Health Coaching for Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Sweden: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study 瑞典慢性阻塞性肺病参与者的家庭体育活动计划和健康指导:一项概念验证试点研究。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.005
Maria V. Benzo MD, MS , Maria Hagströmer PhD , Malin Nygren-Bonnier PhD , Roberto P. Benzo MD, MS , Marian E. Papp PhD

Home-based interventions are at the center stage of current health care demands. There is a clear need to translate pulmonary rehabilitation into a home-based setting. This 8-week pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of a home-based physical activity program for participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Sweden. Patients with COPD, aged 40 years or older and clinically stable in the past 3 months, were recruited. The program used a fitness tracker to monitor step count, weekly health coaching calls using motivational interviewing, and video-guided mindful movements. The outcome measures were adherence to the 8-week program’s video-guided exercises (number of times videos were watched), adherence to health coaching calls (minimum 8), monthly and daily step count, and quality of life (QoL) using the chronic respiratory questionnaire. Thirteen participants were enrolled, and 12 participants adhered to health coaching calls and step monitoring. We had 643 video-exercise views, which exceeded the minimum standard (576 views). The mean difference comparing total monthly steps from baseline and the 8-week time point was 47,039 steps (95% CI, –113,625 to 1623.5; P=.06). The minimal clinical improvement of 500 daily steps was found for 8 of the patients. No significant improvement was found in the QoL measures and mental health. We found the home-based physical activity program to be a feasible intervention. Patients reported high adherence to tracking step counts, health coaching calls, and video-guided exercise. No improvements in QoL or monthly step count emerged; however, we found high adherence and a positive trend in the number of monthly step counts, and improvements of at least 500 daily step counts improved in most patients with this small sample size.

基于家庭的干预措施处于当前医疗保健需求的中心阶段。显然需要将肺部康复转化为家庭环境。这项为期8周的试点研究旨在确定瑞典慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)参与者在家进行体育活动计划的可行性。招募了年龄在40岁或以上且在过去3个月内临床稳定的COPD患者。该项目使用健身追踪器来监测步数,每周使用动机访谈进行健康指导,以及视频引导的正念动作。结果指标包括坚持8周计划的视频指导练习(观看视频的次数)、坚持健康指导电话(至少8次)、每月和每日步数以及使用慢性呼吸问卷的生活质量(QoL)。13名参与者被招募,12名参与者坚持健康指导电话和步骤监测。我们的视频锻炼浏览量为643次,超过了最低标准(576次)。与基线和8周时间点相比,每月总步数的平均差异为47039步(95%CI,-113625至1623.5;P=0.06)。其中8名患者的每日500步数的临床改善最小。在生活质量测量和心理健康方面没有发现显著改善。我们发现以家庭为基础的体育活动计划是一种可行的干预措施。患者报告对追踪步数、健康指导电话和视频指导锻炼的依从性很高。生活质量或月步数没有改善;然而,我们发现,在这种小样本量的大多数患者中,高依从性和每月步数的积极趋势,以及至少500个每日步数的改善。
{"title":"Home-Based Physical Activity Program With Health Coaching for Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Sweden: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study","authors":"Maria V. Benzo MD, MS ,&nbsp;Maria Hagströmer PhD ,&nbsp;Malin Nygren-Bonnier PhD ,&nbsp;Roberto P. Benzo MD, MS ,&nbsp;Marian E. Papp PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Home-based interventions are at the center stage of current health care demands. There is a clear need to translate pulmonary rehabilitation into a home-based setting. This 8-week pilot study aimed to determine the feasibility of a home-based physical activity program for participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Sweden. Patients with COPD, aged 40 years or older and clinically stable in the past 3 months, were recruited. The program used a fitness tracker to monitor step count, weekly health coaching calls using motivational interviewing, and video-guided mindful movements. The outcome measures were adherence to the 8-week program’s video-guided exercises (number of times videos were watched), adherence to health coaching calls (minimum 8), monthly and daily step count, and quality of life (QoL) using the chronic respiratory questionnaire. Thirteen participants were enrolled, and 12 participants adhered to health coaching calls and step monitoring. We had 643 video-exercise views, which exceeded the minimum standard (576 views). The mean difference comparing total monthly steps from baseline and the 8-week time point was 47,039 steps (95% CI, –113,625 to 1623.5; <em>P</em>=.06). The minimal clinical improvement of 500 daily steps was found for 8 of the patients. No significant improvement was found in the QoL measures and mental health. We found the home-based physical activity program to be a feasible intervention. Patients reported high adherence to tracking step counts, health coaching calls, and video-guided exercise. No improvements in QoL or monthly step count emerged; however, we found high adherence and a positive trend in the number of monthly step counts, and improvements of at least 500 daily step counts improved in most patients with this small sample size.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551807/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41160719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Implications of a Supernumerary Nipple Breast Cancer in a BReast CAncer Sequence Variation Carrier: A Case Report 上一个癌症序列变异携带者中癌症乳头数目过多的意义:一例病例报告。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.006
Will Sperduto MD, MBS , Ann McCullough MD , Donald Northfelt MD , Lisa McGee MD , Barbara Pockaj MD , Kristen Jogerst MD, MPH

Supernumerary nipples develop on the chest and abdominopelvic regions along the embryonic milk line. Their anatomy varies from isolated accessory nipples to complete supernumerary nipples (accessory nipple, areola, and underlying glandular breast tissue). Patients with a pathogenic BReast CAncer (BRCA) sequence variation are at an increased cumulative risk of developing breast cancer, and it is the standard of care for them to be offered medical or surgical risk reduction. Given the relatively low prevalence of breast cancer within supernumerary nipples and ectopic glandular breast tissue, no current recommendations exist to guide multidisciplinary management of patients with BRCA sequence variations and ectopic breast tissue. Our case is of a 62-year-old female BRCA-1 carrier with a previous history of right breast cancer who developed a new primary breast cancer within a supernumerary nipple after undergoing surgical risk reduction. With no current consensus on the surgical management of supernumerary nipples in BRCA-1 carriers, our recommendation is to perform a thorough physical examination before risk-reducing operation. If supernumerary nipples or ectopic glandular breast tissue are present, wide-local excision of the tissue should be offered for more complete surgical risk reduction.

沿着胚胎乳线,胸部和腹骨盆区域发育出大量乳头。它们的解剖结构各不相同,从孤立的副乳头到完整的多生乳头(副乳头、乳晕和下面的腺乳腺组织)。致病性B最近癌症(BRCA)序列变异的患者患癌症的累积风险增加,为他们提供医疗或手术风险降低是护理标准。鉴于癌症在多乳乳头和异位腺乳腺组织中的发病率相对较低,目前没有建议指导BRCA序列变异和异位乳腺组织患者的多学科管理。我们的病例是一名62岁的女性BRCA-1携带者,有右乳腺癌症病史,在接受手术风险降低后,在多生乳头内发展为新的原发性癌症。由于目前对BRCA-1携带者乳头过多的外科处理还没有达成共识,我们建议在降低风险的手术前进行彻底的体检。如果存在乳头过多或异位腺体乳腺组织,应提供广泛的局部切除组织,以更彻底地降低手术风险。
{"title":"Implications of a Supernumerary Nipple Breast Cancer in a BReast CAncer Sequence Variation Carrier: A Case Report","authors":"Will Sperduto MD, MBS ,&nbsp;Ann McCullough MD ,&nbsp;Donald Northfelt MD ,&nbsp;Lisa McGee MD ,&nbsp;Barbara Pockaj MD ,&nbsp;Kristen Jogerst MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Supernumerary nipples develop on the chest and abdominopelvic regions along the embryonic milk line. Their anatomy varies from isolated accessory nipples to complete supernumerary nipples (accessory nipple, areola, and underlying glandular breast tissue). Patients with a pathogenic BReast CAncer (BRCA) sequence variation are at an increased cumulative risk of developing breast cancer, and it is the standard of care for them to be offered medical or surgical risk reduction. Given the relatively low prevalence of breast cancer within supernumerary nipples and ectopic glandular breast tissue, no current recommendations exist to guide multidisciplinary management of patients with BRCA sequence variations and ectopic breast tissue. Our case is of a 62-year-old female BRCA-1 carrier with a previous history of right breast cancer who developed a new primary breast cancer within a supernumerary nipple after undergoing surgical risk reduction. With no current consensus on the surgical management of supernumerary nipples in BRCA-1 carriers, our recommendation is to perform a thorough physical examination before risk-reducing operation. If supernumerary nipples or ectopic glandular breast tissue are present, wide-local excision of the tissue should be offered for more complete surgical risk reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/47/main.PMC10518438.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41159066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exercise Therapy in the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease 外周动脉疾病的运动治疗。
Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.004
Ahmad O. Hallak MD , Fatima Z. Hallak MD , Yusuf O. Hallak MD , Osama O. Hallak MD , Aaron W. Hayson MD , Sadia A. Tanami MD , William L. Bennett MD, PhD , Carl J. Lavie MD

The incidence and prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) are increasing globally and have a marked economic burden in the United States. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend exercise therapy as a Class 1A, but its utilization remains suboptimal. This state-of-the-art review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the most updated information available on PAD, along with its risk factors, management options, outcomes, economic burden, and the role of exercise therapy in managing PAD.

外周动脉疾病(PAD)的发病率和流行率在全球范围内不断增加,在美国造成了显著的经济负担。美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会的指导方针建议将运动疗法列为1A类,但其利用率仍不理想。这项最新的综述旨在全面综述PAD的最新信息,以及其风险因素、管理选择、结果、经济负担和运动疗法在PAD管理中的作用。
{"title":"Exercise Therapy in the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease","authors":"Ahmad O. Hallak MD ,&nbsp;Fatima Z. Hallak MD ,&nbsp;Yusuf O. Hallak MD ,&nbsp;Osama O. Hallak MD ,&nbsp;Aaron W. Hayson MD ,&nbsp;Sadia A. Tanami MD ,&nbsp;William L. Bennett MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carl J. Lavie MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The incidence and prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) are increasing globally and have a marked economic burden in the United States. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend exercise therapy as a Class 1A, but its utilization remains suboptimal. This state-of-the-art review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the most updated information available on PAD, along with its risk factors, management options, outcomes, economic burden, and the role of exercise therapy in managing PAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/66/main.PMC10562863.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41224286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1