Neurological research and practice最新文献

Introduction: Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) are universally lethal central nervous system tumors that carry almost unanimously the clonal driver mutation histone-3 K27M (H3K27M). The single amino acid substitution of lysine to methionine harbors a neoantigen that is presented in tumor tissue. The long peptide vaccine H3K27M-vac targeting this major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II)-restricted neoantigen induces mutation-specific immune responses that suppress the growth of H3K27M⁺ flank tumors in an MHC-humanized rodent model.

Methods: INTERCEPT H3 is a non-controlled open label, single arm, multicenter national phase 1 trial to assess safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of H3K27M-vac in combination with standard radiotherapy and the immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab (ATE). 15 adult patients with newly diagnosed K27M-mutant histone-3.1 (H3.1K27M) or histone-3.3 (H3.3K27M) DMG will be enrolled in this trial. The 27mer peptide vaccine H3K27M-vac will be administered concomitantly to standard radiotherapy (RT) followed by combinatorial treatment with the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) targeting antibody ATE. The first three vaccines will be administered bi-weekly (q2w) followed by a dose at the beginning of recovery after RT and six-weekly administrations of doses 5 to 11 thereafter. In a safety lead-in, the first three patients (pts. 1-3) will be enrolled sequentially.

Perspective: H3K27M-vac is a neoepitope targeting long peptide vaccine derived from the clonal driver mutation H3K27M in DMG. The INTERCEPT H3 trial aims at demonstrating (1) safety and (2) immunogenicity of repeated fixed dose vaccinations of H3K27M-vac administered with RT and ATE in adult patients with newly diagnosed H3K27M-mutant DMG.

Trial registration: NCT04808245.

Background/aim: As the clinical differentiation between epileptic seizures, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), and syncope depends mainly on a detailed report of the event, which may not be available, an objective assessment of a potential biochemical analysis is needed. We aimed to investigate whether serum creatine kinase (CK) could be used to differentiate epileptic seizure from PNES and syncope and to assess the strength of evidence present.

Methods: We directed a retrospective cohort study coupled with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that measured CK in patients with epilepsy, PNES, syncope, and healthy controls.

Results: The cohort study, which traced 202 patients, showed that the CK level was significantly higher 48 h after the event in the epilepsy group versus patients with syncope (p < 0.01) Along with 1086 patients obtained through a database search for meta-analysis, CK level compared to different types of seizures from PNES was higher in epileptic seizure patients with a mean difference of 568.966 mIU/ml (95% CI 166.864, 971.067). The subgroup analysis of CK showed that it was higher in GTCS compared to syncope with a mean difference of 125.39 mIU/ml (95% CI 45.25, 205.52).

Discussion: Increased serum levels of CK have been associated mainly with epileptic seizures in relation to non-epileptic events. However, further studies would try to explore the variation in measurements and any other potential diagnostic marker.

Conclusion: The cohort study shows that the CK level in epilepsy seizures is higher after 48 h from the event compared to syncope. Moreover, the meta-analysis results show the present diagnostic utility of CK and its importance to be used in accordance with a detailed report of the event.

Background: Causal therapies are not yet available for most neuromuscular diseases. Additionally, data on the use of complementary or alternative therapies (CAM) in patients groups with a variety of different neuromuscular diseases are rare. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to record the frequency of use and satisfaction of conventional therapies and complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with neuromuscular disorders in order to compare them afterwards.

Methods: Patients from the University of Leipzig (Department and Outpatient Department of Neurology), the Friedrich-Baur-Institute (Department of Neurology), the Hoher Meißner Clinic (Department of Neurology) and the German Society for Muscular Diseases (DGM e.V.) were included. The focus of this study has been on patients with chronic neuromuscular diseases. Our data are based on standardised questionnaires in analogue form from three German neuromuscular centres and in digital form from the official website of the German Society for Muscular Diseases. Therapy satisfaction was assessed with the Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) ranking scale (very satisfactory + 2 to very unsatisfactory - 2).

Results: Of 192 questionnaires analysed, the most common diagnoses were spinal muscular atrophy (n = 42; 21.9%), muscular dystrophies (n = 41; 21.4%) and myotonic dystrophies (n = 38; 19.8%). More than half (n = 112; 58.3%) used both conventional and CAM treatments. Physiotherapy (n = 165) was used most frequently within all treatments with conventional manual (PEGR 1.25, p = 0.013; CI 95%) and aquatic therapy (PEGR 1.3, p = 0.038) showing significantly higher satisfaction compared to therapy on training equipment. Less-used therapies such as psychotherapy (n = 53; PEGR 1.2) were also satisfactory. Within CAM, massages (n = 96) were the most reported and meditation (PEGR 1.5) was best rated. Massage therapy was significantly more satisfactory than progressive muscle relaxation (p = 0.003) and chiropractic treatment (p = 0.036). Chiropractic treatment (PEGR - 0.1) was rated most negatively. No significant differences were found between the group of conventional therapies and CAM users regarding social and disease-dependent factors.

Conclusions: Treatment with conventional therapy (manual, aquatic therapy) and some CAM therapies can be recommended if adequately indicated.

Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for a substantial proportion of ischaemic strokes. A stroke recurrence score has been shown to predict the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS based on a combination of clinical and imaging features. This study aimed to externally validate the performance of the ESUS recurrence score using data from a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: The validation dataset consisted of eligible stroke patients with available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data enrolled in the PreDAFIS sub-study of the MonDAFIS study. The score was calculated using three variables: age (1 point per decade after 35 years), presence of white matter hyperintensities (2 points), and multiterritorial ischaemic stroke (3 points). Patients were assigned to risk groups as described in the original publication. The model was evaluated using standard discrimination and calibration methods.

Results: Of the 1054 patients, 241 (22.9%) were classified as ESUS. Owing to insufficient MRI quality, three patients were excluded, leaving 238 patients (median age 65.5 years [IQR 20.75], 39% female) for analysis. Of these, 30 (13%) patients experienced recurrent ischaemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) during a follow-up period of 383 patient-years, corresponding to an incidence rate of 7.8 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 5.3-11.2). Patients with an ESUS recurrence score value of ≥ 7 had a 2.46 (hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI 1.02-5.93) times higher risk of stroke recurrence than patients with a score of 0-4. The cumulative probability of stroke recurrence in the low-(0-4), intermediate-(5-6), and high-risk group (≥ 7) was 9%, 13%, and 23%, respectively (log-rank test, χ² = 4.2, p = 0.1).

Conclusions: This external validation of a published scoring system supports a threshold of ≥ 7 for identifying ESUS patients at high-risk of stroke recurrence. However, further adjustments may be required to improve the model's performance in independent cohorts. The use of risk scores may be helpful in guiding extended diagnostics and further trials on secondary prevention in patients with ESUS.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT02204267. Registered 30 July 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02204267 .

Headache is one of the most common neurological manifestations of COVID-19, but it is unclear whether chronic headache as a symptom of Post-COVID-19 is associated with ongoing CNS damage. We compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of markers of CNS damage and inflammation in Post-COVID-19 patients with persistent headache to hospitalized acute COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms and to non-COVID-19 disease-controls. CSF levels of neurofilament light chain, Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 and Tau were similar in patients with persistent headache in post-COVID-19 compared to acute COVID-19 patients and all control groups. Levels of glial fibrillary astrocytic protein were lower in patients with persistent headache in post-COVID-19 compared to some control groups of patients with neurological disease. Therefore, our pilot study of CSF markers indicates that persistent post-COVID-19 headache is not a sign of underlying neuronal damage or glial activation.

This letter to the editor discusses "the use of video-EEG monitoring to guide antiseizure medication (ASM) withdrawal in patients with epilepsy" [1]. The author highlights the potential benefits of this approach, including reduced risk of seizure recurrence and improved patient outcomes. The author also notes the need for further research to refine the criteria for identifying patients who are good candidates for ASM withdrawal and to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in different patient populations and settings. Finally, the author discusses the implications of these findings for public health policies related to epilepsy management.

Background: Patients with an intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) often present clinically with severe paresis of the limb and trunk muscles while facial muscles appear less affected. To investigate whether the facial nerves are partially spared from this condition, we performed both peripheral and cranial nerve conduction studies in critically ill patients.

Methods: In patients requiring prolonged ICU therapy, the motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities of the peroneal, ulnar and facial nerves and the muscle action potentials of the associated muscles, as well as the orbicularis oculi reflexes were assessed shortly after admission, and on ICU days 7 and 14.

Results: Eighteen patients were included in the final data analysis (average age 54.2 ± 16.8 years, 8 females). The amplitudes of the peroneal nerve compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were reduced in all patients at ICU days 7 and 14 (F(1.39; 23.63) = 13.85; p < 0.001). There was no similar decrease in the CMAP amplitudes of the ulnar or facial nerve. Other parameters of nerve function (latencies, sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities, sensory nerve action potentials) remained unchanged. The reproducibility of the orbicularis oculi reflex was reduced during the disease course, while its latencies did not change significantly during the disease course.

Conclusions: There is a relative preservation of CMAPs in facial and hand as opposed to foot muscles. This is compatible with the clinical observation that the facial muscles in patients with ICU-AW are less severely affected. This may be primarily a function of the nerve length, and consequently more robust trophic factors in shorter nerves. Trial registration This study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register on April 20th 2020 (DRKS00021467).

Background: Extracranial artery dissection involving either internal carotid artery or vertebral artery is a major cause of stroke in adults under 50 years of age. There is no conclusive evidence whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants are better suited in the treatment of extracranial artery dissection.

Objectives: To determine whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants have advantage over the other in the treatment of extracranial artery dissection for secondary prevention of recurrent ischemic events or death.

Methods: Present meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Database search was done in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2021 using pre-defined search strategy. Additional studies were identified from reference lists from included studies, reviews and previous meta-analyses. Outcome measures were ischaemic stroke, ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and death.

Results: Two RCTs and 64 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. While the outcome measures of stroke, stroke or TIA and death were numerically higher with antiplatelet use, there were no statistically significant differences between antiplatelets and anticoagulants.

Conclusion: We found no significant difference between antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment after extracranial artery dissection. The choice of treatment should be tailored to individual cases.