The Journal of dermatological treatment最新文献

Background: The decision to initiate advanced systemics in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex.

Objectives: To explore disease burden and clinical characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe AD and identify characteristics associated with initiating new systemics.

Methods: Data from prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional CorEvitas AD Registry were evaluated. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, disease severity (vIGA-AD^™; body surface area (BSA); Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); SCORing AD [SCORAD]), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed between systemic and non-systemic therapy groups.

Results: Of 883 patients, 673 were newly prescribed systemics and 210 were not. Non-systemic therapy group had higher than expected rates of severe disease at enrollment based on vIGA-AD = 4 (39%), mean BSA involvement (31%), and mean EASI (19). PROs for non-systemic therapy group indicated elevated burden from AD on quality of life and poor disease control. SCORAD, peak pruritus in the past 24 h, history of biologics, and facial pallor, were significantly associated with initiation of systemics at enrollment.

Conclusion: While disease burden likely influences the initiation of systemic therapy, many patients with significant burden are not treated with systemics for unclear reasons. Further research is needed to identify other factors, beyond disease severity, that influence this decision.

Background: As the available treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) expand, understanding patient and physician preferences becomes crucial for informed decision-making.

Objective: To quantify patient and physician preferences for biologics and oral systemic AD treatment attributes.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, online discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 306 AD patients and 206 physicians throughout the United Kingdom and Germany. Qualitative interviews identified the key attributes for inclusion in the DCE. Each choice task comprised two hypothetical patient profiles. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model.

Results: Results indicated a significant emphasis on efficacy, with reducing sleep disturbance and itch ranking first and second among patients, and the reverse for physicians. Time to itch relief was the third most important efficacy attribute for both groups, but relatively more important for patients than for physicians. For both groups, the risk of eye problems was the most important safety concern of those included. Mode of administration was not of great importance compared to efficacy and safety attributes.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest patients prioritize sleep disturbance, an attribute not captured in prior preference studies in AD, time to itch relief and itch. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing sleep-related issues, whilst also targeting fast itch control, to enhance patients' well-being.

Background: Safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) was investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, head-to-head trials comparing with conventional systemic drugs are lacking and large real-world data on the long-term safety profile as compared are scarce.

Objective: To compare long-term safety profile of dupilumab with conventional systemic drugs used in the management of moderate to severe AD.

Methods: Data from electronic health records of AD patients treated with either dupilumab, azathioprine, Cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, or oral glucocorticoids were retrieved from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Risks of adverse events and new onset of type-2-inflammatory diseases within 5 years after treatment initiation was investigated.

Results: 5 propensity-matched cohorts, up to 18,708 individuals per cohort, were created. Dupilumab treatment displayed reduced risk for diseases of the circulatory, the upper respiratory, and the musculoskeletal system, infections, and type 2 diseases as compared to all other treatment options. In contrast risk for conjunctivitis was increased in dupilumab treated patients as compared to mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate.

Conclusion: Here presented data indicates that treatment with dupilumab for AD has reduced risk for adverse effects of conventional systemic drugs and thus might be safer. Obtained data should be verified in prospective studies.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in treating melasma through a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study focused on identifying associated adverse effects and comparing TXA's effectiveness with other melasma treatments.Materials and methods: Following PROSPERO and PRISMA guidelines, an extensive electronic search was conducted across four databases for RCTs on TXA use in melasma. Inclusion criteria encompassed full-text English articles with specific outcome measures, while studies with high bias risk or non-English publications were excluded. Data were extracted from 22 relevant studies and analyzed using the RevMan software, with heterogeneity identified using I² statistics and forest plots.Results: A total of 22 studies with 1280 patients were included. TXA was administered orally, topically, or via injection, with treatment durations ranging from 8 weeks to nearly 2 years. TXA significantly reduced melasma severity, evidenced by reductions in MASI, mMASI, MI, and hemi-MASI scores. Oral TXA showed the most substantial decrease in MASI scores, followed by injections and topical applications. However, studies exhibited high heterogeneity, particularly in combined treatments. Adverse effects included gastrointestinal discomfort, skin irritation, and menstrual irregularities.Conclusions: TXA is effective in treating melasma, either alone or combined with other treatments. Despite significant reductions in melasma severity, further research is necessary to standardize TXA administration methods and address long-term effects. The high heterogeneity observed suggests a need for more consistent treatment protocols.

Purpose: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) require both skills and support to effectively manage life with the disease. Here, we developed an agenda-setting tool for consultations with patients with AD to establish a collaborative agenda that enhances patient involvement and prioritizes on self-management support.

Materials and methods: Using the design thinking process, we included 64 end-users (patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs)) across the different phases of design thinking. We identified seven overall categories that patients find important to discuss during consultations, which informed the development of a tool for co-creating a consultation agenda (conversation cards, CCs).

Results: Through iterative user testing of the CCs, patients perceived the cards as both inspiring and an invitation from HCPs to openly discuss their needs during consultations. Healthcare professionals have found the CCs easy to use, despite the disruption to the typical consultation process.

Conclusion: In summary, the CCs provide a first-of-its-kind agenda-setting tool for patients with AD. They offer a simple and practical method to establishing a shared agenda that focuses on the patients' needs and are applicable within real-world clinical settings.

Background: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a clinically-heterogeneous genodermatosis with severe manifestations in the skin and other organs. The significant burden this condition places on patients justifies the development of gene therapeutic strategies targeting the genetic cause of the disease.

Methods: Emerging RNA and DNA editing tools have shown remarkable advances in efficiency and safety. Applicable both in ex vivo- and in vivo settings, these gene therapeutics based on gene replacement or editing are either at the pre-clinical or clinical stage.

Results: The recent landmark FDA approvals for gene editing based on CRISPR/Cas9, along with the first FDA-approved redosable in vivo gene replacement therapy for EB, will invigorate ongoing research efforts, increasing the likelihood of achieving local cure via CRISPR-based technologies in the near future.

Conclusions: This review discusses the status quo of current gene therapeutics that act at the level of RNA or DNA, all with the common aim of improving the quality of life for EB patients.

Objectives:We aimed to explore the potential role of omega-3 (ω-3) fatty acids on acne vulgaris by modulating gut microbiota.Materials and Methods:We randomly divided the untreated acne patients into two groups with or without ω-3 fatty acids intervention for 12 weeks. The Sprague Dawley (SD) rats with acne model were given isotretinoin, ω-3 fatty acids or their combination respectively. Then the colonic contents samples of the drug intervention SD rats were transferred to the pseudo sterile rats with acne model. The severity of the disease was assessed by the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) score of the patients, and the swelling rate of auricle and the pathological section of the rat with acne model. The 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed to detect the alteration of the gut microbiota.Results:ω-3 fatty acids could increase the diversity of the gut microbiota and regulate the flora structure positively both in the patients and rats, increase the abundance of butyric acid producing bacteria and GAGS score in the patients, and alleviate the inflammation and comedones of rats.Conclusion:Supplementation of ω-3 fatty acids could alleviate the inflammation of acne vulgaris by increasing the abundance of butyric acid producing bacteria.

Background: Injection site reaction (ISR) is a local phenomenon defined as a constellation of symptoms, including swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the site of injection.Objective: ISR is reported as a frequent adverse event after subcutaneous injection (SCI) of several biologics.Methods: We performed an observational real-life study to compare dupilumab and tralokinumab as regards ISR, analysing frequency, duration and intensity of symptoms related to SCI. From January 2023 to June 2023, we enrolled adult patients affected by moderate to severe AD and being on dupilumab or tralokinumab treatment. A 12 items questionnaire was administered to all enrolled patients.Results and conclusions: Three hundred and ninety-two patients were included. ISR was a frequent occurrence in both the treatment groups, with tralokinumab causing ISR more frequently than dupilumab. However, the reactions were generally mild and no patient stopped therapy.

Aim: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor abrocitinib in patients with localized granuloma annulare (GA) and to review the available cases documented in English.Methods: We presented a patient who had a persistent, localized granuloma anulare (GA) for one year and did not respond to traditional therapies. This patient was treated with oral abrocitinib at a dosage of 150 mg daily.Results: After 6 weeks of treatment with abrocitinib, the patient exhibited notable symptom improvement with no new lesions. No adverse events or recurrences were reported during the 5-month follow-up period.Conclusions: Abrocitinib may be a promising and safe treatment option for patients with localized GA who do not respond to traditional therapies.