Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2386973
Ahmad Alamer, Wejdan Alyazidi, Saad Aldosari, Fatimah Mobarki, Sarah Almakki, Abdullah Alahmari, Mukhtar Alomar, Ziyad Almalki, Tuqa Alkaff, Mohammad Fazel
Background: Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.
Objectives: To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results: A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (n = 89), etanercept (n = 17), risankizumab (n = 30), ustekinumab (n = 14), and ixekizumab (n = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.
Conclusion: This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.
{"title":"Prescribing patterns and persistence of biological therapies for psoriasis management: a retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Ahmad Alamer, Wejdan Alyazidi, Saad Aldosari, Fatimah Mobarki, Sarah Almakki, Abdullah Alahmari, Mukhtar Alomar, Ziyad Almalki, Tuqa Alkaff, Mohammad Fazel","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2386973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2386973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (<i>n</i> = 89), etanercept (<i>n</i> = 17), risankizumab (<i>n</i> = 30), ustekinumab (<i>n</i> = 14), and ixekizumab (<i>n</i> = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2386973"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141895124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-01-17DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2302064
ChanXiu Li, Yue Hu, ZengYi Mu, Lei Shi, Xiao Sun, XinYue Wang, YaPing Wang, XinHong Li
Aim: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of excimer laser (EL)-based combination regimens in improving repigmentation.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase on July 1, 2023, to include randomized controlled trials of EL combination treatments for vitiligo that met the criteria. The primary outcome measure was a repigmentation rate ≥ 75%, and the secondary outcome measures were a repigmentation rate of ≤ 25% and adverse events.
Results: Eleven studies involving 348 patients were included. Network Meta-Analysis showed that EL combined with antioxidants (SUCRA = 98.8%), EL combined with calcipotriol (SUCRA = 59.8%) and EL combined with tacalcitol (SUCRA = 59.6%) were the three optimal interventions achieving repigmentation rates ≥ 75%. EL alone (SUCRA = 77.6%), EL combined with tacalcitol (SUCRA = 61.7%) and EL combined with antioxidants (SUCRA = 57.2%) were the three interventions with the highest rates of treatment failure. Adverse events in all groups mainly included erythema, burning sensation and hyperpigmentation. Based on the results of the current study, EL combination therapies were safe with mild adverse events.
Conclusion: EL combined with antioxidants was the preferred regimen for vitiligo, whereas EL alone was the regimen with the highest rate of treatment failure in vitiligo.
目的:本研究旨在比较基于准分子激光(EL)的联合疗法在改善色素沉着方面的有效性和安全性:方法:于2023年7月1日在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase中进行了全面检索,以纳入符合标准的EL联合治疗白癜风的随机对照试验。主要结果指标是色素沉着率≥75%,次要结果指标是色素沉着率≤25%和不良事件:结果:共纳入 11 项研究,涉及 348 名患者。网络Meta分析显示,EL联合抗氧化剂(SUCRA=98.8%)、EL联合钙泊三醇(SUCRA=59.8%)和EL联合他卡西妥(SUCRA=59.6%)是三种最佳干预方法,再色素沉着率≥75%。单独使用 EL(SUCRA = 77.6%)、EL 联合他卡西妥(SUCRA = 61.7%)和 EL 联合抗氧化剂(SUCRA = 57.2%)是治疗失败率最高的三种干预措施。各组的不良反应主要包括红斑、烧灼感和色素沉着。根据目前的研究结果,EL联合疗法是安全的,不良反应轻微:结论:EL联合抗氧化剂是治疗白癜风的首选疗法,而单独使用EL是治疗白癜风失败率最高的疗法。
{"title":"Comparison of various excimer laser (EL) combination therapies for vitiligo: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"ChanXiu Li, Yue Hu, ZengYi Mu, Lei Shi, Xiao Sun, XinYue Wang, YaPing Wang, XinHong Li","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2302064","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2302064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of excimer laser (EL)-based combination regimens in improving repigmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase on July 1, 2023, to include randomized controlled trials of EL combination treatments for vitiligo that met the criteria. The primary outcome measure was a repigmentation rate ≥ 75%, and the secondary outcome measures were a repigmentation rate of ≤ 25% and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 348 patients were included. Network Meta-Analysis showed that EL combined with antioxidants (SUCRA = 98.8%), EL combined with calcipotriol (SUCRA = 59.8%) and EL combined with tacalcitol (SUCRA = 59.6%) were the three optimal interventions achieving repigmentation rates ≥ 75%. EL alone (SUCRA = 77.6%), EL combined with tacalcitol (SUCRA = 61.7%) and EL combined with antioxidants (SUCRA = 57.2%) were the three interventions with the highest rates of treatment failure. Adverse events in all groups mainly included erythema, burning sensation and hyperpigmentation. Based on the results of the current study, EL combination therapies were safe with mild adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EL combined with antioxidants was the preferred regimen for vitiligo, whereas EL alone was the regimen with the highest rate of treatment failure in vitiligo.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2302064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-03DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2434091
Giampiero Girolomoni, Steven R Feldman, Alexander Egeberg, Luis Puig, Jinah Jung, Hojung Jung, Younju Lee
Background: SB5 (adalimumab-bwwd) is an adalimumab biosimilar targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
Objectives: To assess the four-year persistence associated with the effectiveness and safety of SB5 in patients with psoriasis in the UK and Ireland.
Methods: This prospective study included 1195 SB5-treated patients using British Association of Dermatologists' Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) between 01 June 2018 and 31 August 2022. Persistence was defined as the time from biologic therapy initiation to discontinuation and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate SB5 discontinuation rates. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of covariates on the time-to-first-discontinuation of SB5 with the potential covariates.
Results: SB5 one-, two-, three-, and four-year discontinuation rates were 26.5%, 37.2%, 41.9%, and 43.3%, respectively. Tested covariates such as switching, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and duration of psoriasis did not significantly affect the discontinuation rate of SB5.
Conclusions: Median persistence of SB5 in predominantly bio-naïve psoriasis patients was about 2.5 years in clinical practice. The results suggest that SB5 can be confidently used for patients with psoriasis, offering comparable outcomes to reference adalimumab.
{"title":"Long-term real-world evidence of SB5 (adalimumab biosimilar) treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR).","authors":"Giampiero Girolomoni, Steven R Feldman, Alexander Egeberg, Luis Puig, Jinah Jung, Hojung Jung, Younju Lee","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2434091","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2434091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SB5 (adalimumab-bwwd) is an adalimumab biosimilar targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the four-year persistence associated with the effectiveness and safety of SB5 in patients with psoriasis in the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 1195 SB5-treated patients using British Association of Dermatologists' Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) between 01 June 2018 and 31 August 2022. Persistence was defined as the time from biologic therapy initiation to discontinuation and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate SB5 discontinuation rates. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of covariates on the time-to-first-discontinuation of SB5 with the potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SB5 one-, two-, three-, and four-year discontinuation rates were 26.5%, 37.2%, 41.9%, and 43.3%, respectively. Tested covariates such as switching, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and duration of psoriasis did not significantly affect the discontinuation rate of SB5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Median persistence of SB5 in predominantly bio-naïve psoriasis patients was about 2.5 years in clinical practice. The results suggest that SB5 can be confidently used for patients with psoriasis, offering comparable outcomes to reference adalimumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2434091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142776137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2430687
Emily E Balding, Anna K Martino, Katherine R Salisbury, Steven R Feldman
{"title":"Assessing secondary adherence to topical treatments: scoping review revealing lack of standardized approach in clinical research.","authors":"Emily E Balding, Anna K Martino, Katherine R Salisbury, Steven R Feldman","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2430687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2430687","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2430687"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142741562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2434098
Liyan Yuan, Xiaoling Yu, Yanqiang Shi, Bin Yang, Xiaohua Wang
Background: Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) is a rare pustular psoriasis variant predominantly affects the distal phalanges of the fingers and toes. However, data on aggravating factors and treatment outcomes is limited.
Objective: This study aims to analyze the aggravating factors and treatment outcomes of ACH in a three-tertiary-hospital in South China.
Methods: We analyzed ACH patients from Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, considering patient and disease characteristics along with treatment experiences.
Results: We identified 96 ACH patients. Various predisposing events were identified, including lifestyle factors, vaccination, stress, trauma, menstruation and drug exposure. A total of 293 systemic treatment courses were analyzed. 54.3% of patients received at least one biologic therapy, while 45.7% were treated with nonbiologic treatments. Acitretin was the most common therapy (20.5%). However, the effectiveness of systemic treatments was low (excellent response rate: 26.3%). Among non-biologic treatments, Acitretin showed a significant response in 30.0% (18/60) of cases, followed by cyclosporin (20.0%, 2/10). Among biologics, spesolimab had the best response rate at 75.0% (n = 3), followed by ixekizumab (44.4%, 8/18). Small molecule drugs did not yeild satisfactory outcomes in ACH treatment.
Conclusion: Identifying triggers and aggravating factors is crucial for effective ACH treatment. We suggest that biologics may be a useful first-line treatment option for clinicians managing ACH.
{"title":"Acrodermatitis continua of hallopeau: aggravating factors and treatment outcomes of 96 patients.","authors":"Liyan Yuan, Xiaoling Yu, Yanqiang Shi, Bin Yang, Xiaohua Wang","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2434098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2434098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) is a rare pustular psoriasis variant predominantly affects the distal phalanges of the fingers and toes. However, data on aggravating factors and treatment outcomes is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the aggravating factors and treatment outcomes of ACH in a three-tertiary-hospital in South China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed ACH patients from Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University, considering patient and disease characteristics along with treatment experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 96 ACH patients. Various predisposing events were identified, including lifestyle factors, vaccination, stress, trauma, menstruation and drug exposure. A total of 293 systemic treatment courses were analyzed. 54.3% of patients received at least one biologic therapy, while 45.7% were treated with nonbiologic treatments. Acitretin was the most common therapy (20.5%). However, the effectiveness of systemic treatments was low (excellent response rate: 26.3%). Among non-biologic treatments, Acitretin showed a significant response in 30.0% (18/60) of cases, followed by cyclosporin (20.0%, 2/10). Among biologics, spesolimab had the best response rate at 75.0% (<i>n</i> = 3), followed by ixekizumab (44.4%, 8/18). Small molecule drugs did not yeild satisfactory outcomes in ACH treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying triggers and aggravating factors is crucial for effective ACH treatment. We suggest that biologics may be a useful first-line treatment option for clinicians managing ACH.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2434098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The occurrence of acne in patients treated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for skin diseases is a potential issue, which may reduce treatment adherence.
Purpose: To systematically analyzes randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitors in dermatological indications for the risk of acne as an adverse event.
Methods: A meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) for acne incidence was conducted. Data were quantitatively synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values representing the relative ranking probabilities of treatments were obtained. Analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.4.0.
Results: A total of 11,396 patients were included from 24 studies. The incidence of acne for JAK inhibitors was ranked according to the SUCRA as follows: JAK1 inhibitors > TYK2 inhibitors > combined JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitors > combined JAK1 and TYK2 inhibitors > JAK3 + TEC inhibitors > pan-JAK inhibitors. ORs were higher for longer durations of drug use and larger dosages. Subgroup analyses by disease indication revealed increased ORs for psoriasis (5.52 [95% CI, 1.39-21.88]), vitiligo (4.15 [95% CI, 1.27-13.58]), alopecia areata (3.86 [95% CI, 1.58-9.42]), and atopic dermatitis (2.82 [95% CI, 1.75-4.54]). The use of JAK inhibitors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may not significantly increase the incidence of acne.
Conclusions: There are higher rates of acne following treatment with JAK inhibitors for dermatologic indications, particularly with longer durations and larger dosages. Pan-JAK inhibitors exhibit the lowest incidence of acne.
{"title":"Janus kinase inhibitors and adverse events of acne in dermatologic indications: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Bai-Lin Chen, Shan Huang, Xiao-Wan Dong, Dou-Dou Wu, Yan-Ping Bai, Yuan-Yuan Chen","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2397477","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2397477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The occurrence of acne in patients treated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for skin diseases is a potential issue, which may reduce treatment adherence.</p><p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To systematically analyzes randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitors in dermatological indications for the risk of acne as an adverse event.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> A meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) for acne incidence was conducted. Data were quantitatively synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values representing the relative ranking probabilities of treatments were obtained. Analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.4.0.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 11,396 patients were included from 24 studies. The incidence of acne for JAK inhibitors was ranked according to the SUCRA as follows: JAK1 inhibitors > TYK2 inhibitors > combined JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitors > combined JAK1 and TYK2 inhibitors > JAK3 + TEC inhibitors > pan-JAK inhibitors. ORs were higher for longer durations of drug use and larger dosages. Subgroup analyses by disease indication revealed increased ORs for psoriasis (5.52 [95% CI, 1.39-21.88]), vitiligo (4.15 [95% CI, 1.27-13.58]), alopecia areata (3.86 [95% CI, 1.58-9.42]), and atopic dermatitis (2.82 [95% CI, 1.75-4.54]). The use of JAK inhibitors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may not significantly increase the incidence of acne.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> There are higher rates of acne following treatment with JAK inhibitors for dermatologic indications, particularly with longer durations and larger dosages. Pan-JAK inhibitors exhibit the lowest incidence of acne.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2397477"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-06DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2411849
Yiyi Wang, Yue Xiao, Lingyan Zhang, Furong Li, Hongxiang Hu, Xiya Peng, Jingya Gao, Min Yang, Wei Yan, Li Qiu, Wei Li
Background and objectives: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder affecting 30% of psoriatic patients. Effective treatment, especially with biologics like IL-17 and TNF inhibitors, is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of secukinumab and adalimumab in PsA patients through clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations.Materials and methods: We enrolled 116 PsA patients, with 58 patients receiving secukinumab and 58 receiving adalimumab. Regular follow-ups were conducted at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 20% improvement in the ACR response (ACR20) at week 12, with additional evaluations for axial arthritis, enthesitis, skin involvement, minimal disease activity, health assessment questionnaire, and ultrasound changes.Results: There was no significant difference in ACR20 response between the two groups at week 12 (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.26-1.37, p = 0.22). However, secukinumab demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)90 (OR: 2.25, 95%CI: 1.07-4.74, p = 0.03), while adalimumab showed better improvement in ultrasound synovitis count (β: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.09-1.79, p = 0.03) and synovitis PD signal (β: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.03-0.36, p = 0.02).Conclusions: In conclusion, both treatments were highly effective for PsA, with secukinumab being more suitable for severe skin involvement and adalimumab for significant ultrasound-confirmed synovitis.
{"title":"Superior effect of adalimumab versus secukinumab on ultrasound-confirmed synovitis in psoriatic arthritis: comprehensive evidence from musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical assessments.","authors":"Yiyi Wang, Yue Xiao, Lingyan Zhang, Furong Li, Hongxiang Hu, Xiya Peng, Jingya Gao, Min Yang, Wei Yan, Li Qiu, Wei Li","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2411849","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2411849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and objectives:</b> Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder affecting 30% of psoriatic patients. Effective treatment, especially with biologics like IL-17 and TNF inhibitors, is vital for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of secukinumab and adalimumab in PsA patients through clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations.<b>Materials and methods:</b> We enrolled 116 PsA patients, with 58 patients receiving secukinumab and 58 receiving adalimumab. Regular follow-ups were conducted at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 20% improvement in the ACR response (ACR20) at week 12, with additional evaluations for axial arthritis, enthesitis, skin involvement, minimal disease activity, health assessment questionnaire, and ultrasound changes.<b>Results:</b> There was no significant difference in ACR20 response between the two groups at week 12 (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.26-1.37, <i>p</i> = 0.22). However, secukinumab demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)90 (OR: 2.25, 95%CI: 1.07-4.74, <i>p</i> = 0.03), while adalimumab showed better improvement in ultrasound synovitis count (β: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.09-1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and synovitis PD signal (β: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.03-0.36, <i>p</i> = 0.02).<b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, both treatments were highly effective for PsA, with secukinumab being more suitable for severe skin involvement and adalimumab for significant ultrasound-confirmed synovitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2411849"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142383133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-01-14DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2304020
Steven R Feldman, Jacob P Thyssen, Marco Boeri, Robert Gerber, Maureen P Neary, Amy Cha, Brett Hauber, Joseph C Cappelleri, Jason Xenakis, Colton Leach, Joshua Zeichner
Purpose: Topical treatments for mild-to-moderate (MM) atopic dermatitis (AD) include emollients, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, a Janus kinase inhibitor, and a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, which differ in multiple ways. This study aimed to quantify the conditional relative importance (CRI) of attributes of topical treatments for MM AD among adult and adolescent patients and caregivers of children with MM AD.Materials and methods: A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to US adults and adolescents with MM AD and caregivers of children with MM AD. Each choice task comprised 2 hypothetical topical treatments characterized by efficacy, adverse events, vehicle, and application frequency. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model to calculate the CRI of each attribute.Results and conclusions: 300 adults, 331 adolescents, and 330 caregivers completed the DCE. Avoiding changes in skin color (CRI 29.0) and time until itch improves (26.6) were most important to adults, followed by time until clear/almost clear skin (17.8). Application frequency (3.0) did not have a statistically significant impact on adults' choices. Adolescents were less concerned about changes in skin color than adults or caregivers; caregivers were less concerned about time until clear/almost clear skin than patients. Physicians should consider age-relevant aspects of preferences in treatment discussions with patients and caregivers.
{"title":"Adult, adolescent, and caregiver preferences for attributes of topical treatments for mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a discrete-choice experiment.","authors":"Steven R Feldman, Jacob P Thyssen, Marco Boeri, Robert Gerber, Maureen P Neary, Amy Cha, Brett Hauber, Joseph C Cappelleri, Jason Xenakis, Colton Leach, Joshua Zeichner","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2304020","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2304020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Topical treatments for mild-to-moderate (MM) atopic dermatitis (AD) include emollients, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, a Janus kinase inhibitor, and a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, which differ in multiple ways. This study aimed to quantify the conditional relative importance (CRI) of attributes of topical treatments for MM AD among adult and adolescent patients and caregivers of children with MM AD.<b>Materials and methods:</b> A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to US adults and adolescents with MM AD and caregivers of children with MM AD. Each choice task comprised 2 hypothetical topical treatments characterized by efficacy, adverse events, vehicle, and application frequency. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model to calculate the CRI of each attribute.<b>Results and conclusions:</b> 300 adults, 331 adolescents, and 330 caregivers completed the DCE. Avoiding changes in skin color (CRI 29.0) and time until itch improves (26.6) were most important to adults, followed by time until clear/almost clear skin (17.8). Application frequency (3.0) did not have a statistically significant impact on adults' choices. Adolescents were less concerned about changes in skin color than adults or caregivers; caregivers were less concerned about time until clear/almost clear skin than patients. Physicians should consider age-relevant aspects of preferences in treatment discussions with patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2304020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139467523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}