The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses最新文献

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Negative physical health results from the emotional stress of providing care to a family member with a primary malignant brain tumor; however, the downstream effects on caregivers' healthcare utilization (HCU) are unknown. This analysis examined associations between caregivers' emotional health and markers of HCU during the 6 months after patients' diagnoses. METHODS: Caregivers' self-report HCU data from a longitudinal study with 116 neuro-oncology caregivers were analyzed. Healthcare utilization was operationalized as number of prescription medications, reporting visits to primary care providers (PCPs), nature of PCP visit, number of comorbid conditions, and change in comorbid conditions. Potential predictors were caregivers' depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), hours providing care per day, mastery (Pearlin and Schooler), and burden (Caregiver Reaction Assessment). Logistic mixed effects modeling were used. RESULTS : Caregivers with higher levels of depressive symptoms ( P < .01), anxiety ( P = .02), burden related to schedule ( P = .02), and abandonment ( P < .01) were more likely to report worsening comorbid conditions. Those with higher mastery ( P = .02) were less likely to report worsening comorbid conditions. Caregivers who had a PCP visit and reported higher burden related to feelings of self-esteem ( P = .03) were more likely to report an illness-related visit. CONCLUSION : Findings suggest a relationship between neuro-oncology caregivers' emotional health and their HCU. Data highlight the importance of caregivers' PCPs identifying caregivers at risk for deteriorating health and increased HCU and intervene to ensure caregivers' self-care.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Stroke care guidelines recommend early mobilization of acute ischemic stroke patients, but there are sparse data regarding early mobilization of stroke patients receiving thrombolytic therapy. We developed the Providence Early Mobility for Stroke (PEMS) protocol to mobilize patients to their highest individual tolerance within 24 hours of stroke admission in 2010, and it has been in continuous use at our primary and comprehensive stroke centers for over a decade. In this study, we evaluated the PEMS protocol in all patients treated with intravenous alteplase without endovascular treatment. METHODS : This retrospective study includes 318 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with alteplase who were admitted to 2 urban stroke centers between January 2013 and December of 2017 and were mobilized with the PEMS protocol within 24 hours of receiving alteplase. Safety of PEMS was assessed by change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 24 hours by time first mobilized. Using multivariate and logistic regression models, we analyzed time first mobilized and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS). RESULTS : Median time first mobilized was 9 hours from administration of alteplase. For every hour delay in mobilization, the odds of being slightly or moderately disabled (mRS, 2-3) at 90 days increased by 7% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; P = .004), and the odds of being severely disabled or dead (mRS, 4-6) at 90 days increased by 7% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; P = .02). In addition, for every hour delay in mobilization, 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale increased by 1.8%. DISCUSSION: Our results support that the PEMS protocol is safe, and possibly beneficial, for acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous alteplase. Our protocol differs from other very early mobility protocols because it does not prescribe a "dose" of activity. Instead, each patient was mobilized to his/her individual highest degree as soon as it was safe to do so.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Emerging research suggests the need for implementation of mobility protocols and consistent evaluation of the impact on patient outcomes. Standardized mobility guidelines may be a solution for promoting nurse-driven mobility efforts and influencing a shift in the culture of mobility among nursing teams. In a 36-bed neurosurgical intensive care unit, 2 key areas of opportunity were identified related to patient mobility: strengthening of frontline nursing engagement in mobility and accuracy of documented early and safe mobilization. METHODS: Using a plan-do-study-act performance improvement framework, an interprofessional team developed a comprehensive early patient mobility program. Defined criteria and mobility rounds assisted in identifying the patient's functional ability and level of assistance. Nursing staff received education in case study format to enhance understanding and improve practical application of the phases of mobility. Chart reviews served as continuous assessment of documented mobilizations within the appropriate phases of mobility, and surveys evaluated staff perceptions of program success. RESULTS: On a rating scale of 1 to 5, clinicians reported a rating of 4.32 in overall observation that patients are safely mobilized earlier and more frequently and 4.48 on overall improvement in the neurosurgical intensive care unit culture of mobility. CONCLUSION: An interprofessional mobility program focusing on safe and early mobilization may improve overall culture, confidence, and empowerment of the frontline clinicians.