Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000878
DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"Can We Transform the Medical Record Back Into a Meaningful Story of Care?","authors":"DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000878","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000878","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000863
Meagan Hainlen, Jennifer L Watt, DaiWai M Olson, Afsaneh Talai
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: In pediatric epilepsy monitoring units (EMU), nurses are essential in assessing seizure activity and neurological status. One critical element of neurological evaluation is the pupillary light reflex (PLR), traditionally assessed manually with low interrater reliability. Quantitative pupillometry offers a more accurate and reliable method for evaluating PLR, yet its use in EMUs has not been well described. The objective is to describe the implementation of quantitative pupillometry in a pediatric EMU through a nurse-led initiative. METHODS: A collaborative effort between nursing and physician leadership introduced the NPi-200 pupillometer in a pediatric EMU. Nurses received hands-on training, and a standardized electronic order was developed to integrate the tool into clinical workflows. Accessibility issues were addressed by relocating the device to a central nursing station. RESULTS: Over the pilot period, 40 patients underwent pupillometry assessments, with 88% yielding complete data. No adverse events occurred. Nurses reported the device was easy to use and successfully incorporated it into their routine care, even for children with developmental delay. CONCLUSION: Pupillometry can be effectively and safely implemented in the pediatric EMU setting through a nurse-driven process. This initiative demonstrated high usability, safety, and integration into clinical practice, supporting its broader use for neurological monitoring in epilepsy care.
{"title":"Nursing Implementation of Pupillometry in a Pediatric Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.","authors":"Meagan Hainlen, Jennifer L Watt, DaiWai M Olson, Afsaneh Talai","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000863","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>INTRODUCTION: In pediatric epilepsy monitoring units (EMU), nurses are essential in assessing seizure activity and neurological status. One critical element of neurological evaluation is the pupillary light reflex (PLR), traditionally assessed manually with low interrater reliability. Quantitative pupillometry offers a more accurate and reliable method for evaluating PLR, yet its use in EMUs has not been well described. The objective is to describe the implementation of quantitative pupillometry in a pediatric EMU through a nurse-led initiative. METHODS: A collaborative effort between nursing and physician leadership introduced the NPi-200 pupillometer in a pediatric EMU. Nurses received hands-on training, and a standardized electronic order was developed to integrate the tool into clinical workflows. Accessibility issues were addressed by relocating the device to a central nursing station. RESULTS: Over the pilot period, 40 patients underwent pupillometry assessments, with 88% yielding complete data. No adverse events occurred. Nurses reported the device was easy to use and successfully incorporated it into their routine care, even for children with developmental delay. CONCLUSION: Pupillometry can be effectively and safely implemented in the pediatric EMU setting through a nurse-driven process. This initiative demonstrated high usability, safety, and integration into clinical practice, supporting its broader use for neurological monitoring in epilepsy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"42-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000867
Haley L Johnson, Heather Carter-Templeton, Rachel Lumbus, Amanda Foster, Patrick Murphy, Matthew Smith, Angela Jeffries
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Frequent neurological assessments (neuro-checks) are critical for early detection of neurological deterioration in patients with acquired brain injuries. However, extended use of hourly neuro-checks may negatively impact patient outcomes by contributing to sleep deprivation, intensive care unit (ICU) delirium, and staff burden. PURPOSE: This quality improvement initiative aimed to evaluate the implementation of a nurse-driven protocol to reduce unnecessary hourly neuro-checks in stable Neurocritical Care Unit (NCCU) patients after 48 hours of admission. METHODS: This project involved adult NCCU patients and staff at an academic medical center. A stepwise nurse-driven protocol, based on patient stability criteria, guided neuro-check frequency. Preimplementation and postimplementation data from electronic health records included hourly neuro-check order volumes, Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores, and length of stay. Staff perceptions of the nurse-driven protocol were gathered using a survey. RESULTS: During the 3-month implementation period, the number of hourly neuro-check orders on the NCCU decreased by 19% (from 372 to 301). The proportion of patients with at least 1 positive CAM-ICU score decreased from 90 to 58 (39.8% to 31.7%), and the length of stay distribution showed fewer very short (<2 d) and/or prolonged admissions (>9 d). Staff survey responses indicated increased confidence in patient safety and improved workflow following education and protocol use. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-led protocol to individualize neuro-check frequency was implemented successfully in the NCCU, with observed trends in patient outcomes, staff workflow efficiency, and nursing confidence. Continued evaluation is warranted to assess sustainability and generalizability across other critical care units.
{"title":"Reassessing Hourly Neurological Assessments: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Haley L Johnson, Heather Carter-Templeton, Rachel Lumbus, Amanda Foster, Patrick Murphy, Matthew Smith, Angela Jeffries","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000867","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000867","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Frequent neurological assessments (neuro-checks) are critical for early detection of neurological deterioration in patients with acquired brain injuries. However, extended use of hourly neuro-checks may negatively impact patient outcomes by contributing to sleep deprivation, intensive care unit (ICU) delirium, and staff burden. PURPOSE: This quality improvement initiative aimed to evaluate the implementation of a nurse-driven protocol to reduce unnecessary hourly neuro-checks in stable Neurocritical Care Unit (NCCU) patients after 48 hours of admission. METHODS: This project involved adult NCCU patients and staff at an academic medical center. A stepwise nurse-driven protocol, based on patient stability criteria, guided neuro-check frequency. Preimplementation and postimplementation data from electronic health records included hourly neuro-check order volumes, Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) scores, and length of stay. Staff perceptions of the nurse-driven protocol were gathered using a survey. RESULTS: During the 3-month implementation period, the number of hourly neuro-check orders on the NCCU decreased by 19% (from 372 to 301). The proportion of patients with at least 1 positive CAM-ICU score decreased from 90 to 58 (39.8% to 31.7%), and the length of stay distribution showed fewer very short (<2 d) and/or prolonged admissions (>9 d). Staff survey responses indicated increased confidence in patient safety and improved workflow following education and protocol use. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-led protocol to individualize neuro-check frequency was implemented successfully in the NCCU, with observed trends in patient outcomes, staff workflow efficiency, and nursing confidence. Continued evaluation is warranted to assess sustainability and generalizability across other critical care units.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"48-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145992435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-25DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000880
Francesco Pastore, Valentina Simonetti, Barbara Forastefano, Emanuela Domenicone, Elena Amelio, Tommaso Guerra, Giancarlo Cicolini, Dania Comparcini
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mental health literacy (MHL) is a key factor influencing mental health outcomes and may affect quality of life (QoL) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), who often experience psychiatric comorbidities. However, research on MHL in multiple sclerosis remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate levels of MHL in pwMS and the relationship with their QoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted between March and August 2024. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey consisting of a questionnaire divided into 4 sections: sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; patient experience with nursing care; the Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire-Short Version for adults (MHLq-SVa) assessing MHL across 4 domains; and the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire to assess QoL. Statistical analyses included psychometric validation procedures. RESULTS: A total of 170 adult pwMS participated. Participants showed moderate MHL levels, with better knowledge of mental health problems than in other domains. Higher MHL was significantly associated with female gender and higher educational attainment. Weak correlations were found between MHL and QoL, with only 1 domain: knowledge of mental health problems, which showed a significant association. The MHLq-SVa demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.816) and construct validity. CONCLUSION: While MHL appears to be influenced by gender and education, its direct impact on QoL in pwMS remains limited. These findings indicate that improving MHL alone may be insufficient to enhance well-being, and that additional factors must also be addressed. Nurses are strategically positioned to assess and support MHL, and validated tools like the MHLq-SVa can guide targeted educational strategies within multidisciplinary care.
{"title":"Exploring Mental Health Literacy and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Francesco Pastore, Valentina Simonetti, Barbara Forastefano, Emanuela Domenicone, Elena Amelio, Tommaso Guerra, Giancarlo Cicolini, Dania Comparcini","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000880","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Mental health literacy (MHL) is a key factor influencing mental health outcomes and may affect quality of life (QoL) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), who often experience psychiatric comorbidities. However, research on MHL in multiple sclerosis remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to investigate levels of MHL in pwMS and the relationship with their QoL and sociodemographic factors. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted between March and August 2024. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey consisting of a questionnaire divided into 4 sections: sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; patient experience with nursing care; the Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire-Short Version for adults (MHLq-SVa) assessing MHL across 4 domains; and the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire to assess QoL. Statistical analyses included psychometric validation procedures. RESULTS: A total of 170 adult pwMS participated. Participants showed moderate MHL levels, with better knowledge of mental health problems than in other domains. Higher MHL was significantly associated with female gender and higher educational attainment. Weak correlations were found between MHL and QoL, with only 1 domain: knowledge of mental health problems, which showed a significant association. The MHLq-SVa demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.816) and construct validity. CONCLUSION: While MHL appears to be influenced by gender and education, its direct impact on QoL in pwMS remains limited. These findings indicate that improving MHL alone may be insufficient to enhance well-being, and that additional factors must also be addressed. Nurses are strategically positioned to assess and support MHL, and validated tools like the MHLq-SVa can guide targeted educational strategies within multidisciplinary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147291816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-20DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000882
Yuan Li, Emerson B Nairon, Lindsay Riskey, Yohan Kim, DaiWai M Olson
Background: Measuring intracranial pressure with an external ventricular drain (EVD) if blood is present in the system may alter the rate at which cerebrospinal fluid drains. This study explored the differences in EVD drainage rate between 0.9% NaCl (saline) and blood. METHODS: This preclinical study used an acrylic chamber to represent the skull and EVD tubing. Four conditions were simulated by alternately filling the chamber, EVD tubing, or both, with saline or blood. The EVD was opened to drain at a pressure of 15 mm Hg with the column set for 10 mm Hg. The volume of drainage in the first minute after the drain opening determined the rate. RESULTS: There were significant differences in drainage rates among the 4 conditions (P<0.0001). A Tukey post hoc test showed that when the system contained only saline, the drainage rate was significantly higher than that with blood in the tubing, the chamber, or both (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in drainage rate with blood in the EVD tubing (P=0.424).
Conclusions: The physical properties of the cerebrospinal fluid drainage are key factors in determining drainage efficiency. The high viscosity of blood significantly inhibits drainage, and the low resistance properties of saline optimize drainage dynamics. These data provide an important direction for improving clinical EVD management.
背景:如果系统中存在血液,用外脑室引流(EVD)测量颅内压可能会改变脑脊液排出的速度。本研究探讨0.9% NaCl(生理盐水)与血液EVD引流率的差异。方法:本临床前研究使用丙烯酸腔体代表颅骨和EVD管。用生理盐水或血液交替填充腔室、EVD管或两者同时填充,模拟四种情况。打开EVD,在15 mm Hg的压力下排出,柱设置为10 mm Hg。排水管打开后一分钟的排水量决定了排水管的速率。结果:4种情况下脑脊液引流率差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:脑脊液引流物性是影响引流效果的关键因素。血液的高粘度明显抑制引流,而生理盐水的低阻力特性优化了引流动力学。这些数据为加强埃博拉病毒病的临床管理提供了重要的指导。
{"title":"A Preclinical Study Examining the Role of Fluid Viscosity in Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage Via an External Ventricular Drain.","authors":"Yuan Li, Emerson B Nairon, Lindsay Riskey, Yohan Kim, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring intracranial pressure with an external ventricular drain (EVD) if blood is present in the system may alter the rate at which cerebrospinal fluid drains. This study explored the differences in EVD drainage rate between 0.9% NaCl (saline) and blood. METHODS: This preclinical study used an acrylic chamber to represent the skull and EVD tubing. Four conditions were simulated by alternately filling the chamber, EVD tubing, or both, with saline or blood. The EVD was opened to drain at a pressure of 15 mm Hg with the column set for 10 mm Hg. The volume of drainage in the first minute after the drain opening determined the rate. RESULTS: There were significant differences in drainage rates among the 4 conditions (P<0.0001). A Tukey post hoc test showed that when the system contained only saline, the drainage rate was significantly higher than that with blood in the tubing, the chamber, or both (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in drainage rate with blood in the EVD tubing (P=0.424).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The physical properties of the cerebrospinal fluid drainage are key factors in determining drainage efficiency. The high viscosity of blood significantly inhibits drainage, and the low resistance properties of saline optimize drainage dynamics. These data provide an important direction for improving clinical EVD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146260555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-13DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000881
Charles J Shamoun
Background: Stroke survivors often rely on informal care partners (ICPs), who commonly experience caregiver burden (CB) across multiple domains. Although CB has been widely studied, many interventions remain ineffective, potentially due to a limited understanding of how social needs shape ICP experiences. Health-related social needs (HRSNs), such as food insecurity, transportation barriers, and lack of support, may contribute significantly to CB but remain largely unexamined in stroke care partnership research. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional study examined the relationship between 12 HRSN domains and both total and domain-specific CB among ICPs of stroke survivors. A sample of 81 ICPs from the United States was recruited through social media and stroke support groups. Participants completed a demographic survey, the Accountable Health Communities HRSN Screening Tool, and the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI). Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and stepwise multiple linear regressions were conducted using SPSS v29. RESULTS: Nearly all HRSNs domains were associated with significantly higher CB scores. Stepwise regression identified 3 significant predictors of total CB: transportation needs, family and community support needs, and education (adjusted R2=0.374, P<0.001). Additional HRSNs emerged as predictors of specific CB domains. Mental health needs predicted both physical and developmental burden, while utility needs predicted emotional burden, for example. Race did not significantly moderate any observed relationships. Reliability of the CBI and its subscales was strong (α=0.822 to 0.952).
Conclusion: Findings demonstrate that HRSNs significantly contribute to the CB experienced by ICPs of stroke survivors, highlighting actionable HRSNs. Incorporating structured HRSN screening into stroke aftercare may inform more responsive, equitable approaches to CB reduction and support the development of socially informed clinical pathways.
{"title":"Impact of Health-Related Social Needs on Caregiver Burden Among Informal Care Partners of Stroke Survivors: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Charles J Shamoun","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke survivors often rely on informal care partners (ICPs), who commonly experience caregiver burden (CB) across multiple domains. Although CB has been widely studied, many interventions remain ineffective, potentially due to a limited understanding of how social needs shape ICP experiences. Health-related social needs (HRSNs), such as food insecurity, transportation barriers, and lack of support, may contribute significantly to CB but remain largely unexamined in stroke care partnership research. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional study examined the relationship between 12 HRSN domains and both total and domain-specific CB among ICPs of stroke survivors. A sample of 81 ICPs from the United States was recruited through social media and stroke support groups. Participants completed a demographic survey, the Accountable Health Communities HRSN Screening Tool, and the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI). Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and stepwise multiple linear regressions were conducted using SPSS v29. RESULTS: Nearly all HRSNs domains were associated with significantly higher CB scores. Stepwise regression identified 3 significant predictors of total CB: transportation needs, family and community support needs, and education (adjusted R2=0.374, P<0.001). Additional HRSNs emerged as predictors of specific CB domains. Mental health needs predicted both physical and developmental burden, while utility needs predicted emotional burden, for example. Race did not significantly moderate any observed relationships. Reliability of the CBI and its subscales was strong (α=0.822 to 0.952).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate that HRSNs significantly contribute to the CB experienced by ICPs of stroke survivors, highlighting actionable HRSNs. Incorporating structured HRSN screening into stroke aftercare may inform more responsive, equitable approaches to CB reduction and support the development of socially informed clinical pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146184116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000877
Brooke Murtaugh, DaiWai Olson, Kartyva Sharma, Ariane Lewis, Elizabeth Zink, Jessica Bombino-Elliott, Jennifer A Weaver, Gisele Sampaio-Silva
Background: The frequency and nature of neurological exams (neuro-checks) in patients with severe acquired brain injury resulting in coma or disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain variable, with limited evidence guiding practice and poor understanding of their role in predicting and preventing neurological deterioration, functional recovery and adverse effects such as delirium. This scoping review aims to explore the frequency of bedside neurological exams within the first 7 days of injury impact on clinical outcomes in adult patients with severe acquired brain injury including mortality, neurological deterioration, long-term function, and delirium. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL, Medline and EMBASE databases from 2003 to 2023. Search terms captured a range of acute brain injuries and neuro-assessment tools. Eligible studies included adult patients with severe traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury or stroke that addressed frequency of bedside neurological exams within the first 7 days of admission. RESULTS: Of 1327 studies screened, 20 met inclusion criteria, representing over 16,000 patients across 14 countries. Assessment tools varied, but use of the Glasgow Coma Scale was prevalent. Frequency of neuro-checks ranged from hourly to daily. Multiple outcome measures were utilized. Some studies found that continuing hourly neuro-checks beyond the first 48 hours did not provide additional clinical benefit. Others associated excessive assessment with increased stress or delirium. CONCLUSION: There is very low evidence supporting an association between the frequency of neuro-checks and functional outcomes, mortality, length of stay, or delirium. Although early assessments may aid prognostication, excessive exams may not improve outcomes and may contribute to harm. The heterogeneity, lack of evidence, and limited standardization of neuro-check frequency highlight the need for clinical research to guide future practice.
{"title":"Bedside Neurological Check Frequency Does Not Explain Outcomes for Patients With Coma and Disorders of Consciousness: A Curing Coma Campaign Scoping Review.","authors":"Brooke Murtaugh, DaiWai Olson, Kartyva Sharma, Ariane Lewis, Elizabeth Zink, Jessica Bombino-Elliott, Jennifer A Weaver, Gisele Sampaio-Silva","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The frequency and nature of neurological exams (neuro-checks) in patients with severe acquired brain injury resulting in coma or disorders of consciousness (DoC) remain variable, with limited evidence guiding practice and poor understanding of their role in predicting and preventing neurological deterioration, functional recovery and adverse effects such as delirium. This scoping review aims to explore the frequency of bedside neurological exams within the first 7 days of injury impact on clinical outcomes in adult patients with severe acquired brain injury including mortality, neurological deterioration, long-term function, and delirium. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, CINAHL, Medline and EMBASE databases from 2003 to 2023. Search terms captured a range of acute brain injuries and neuro-assessment tools. Eligible studies included adult patients with severe traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury or stroke that addressed frequency of bedside neurological exams within the first 7 days of admission. RESULTS: Of 1327 studies screened, 20 met inclusion criteria, representing over 16,000 patients across 14 countries. Assessment tools varied, but use of the Glasgow Coma Scale was prevalent. Frequency of neuro-checks ranged from hourly to daily. Multiple outcome measures were utilized. Some studies found that continuing hourly neuro-checks beyond the first 48 hours did not provide additional clinical benefit. Others associated excessive assessment with increased stress or delirium. CONCLUSION: There is very low evidence supporting an association between the frequency of neuro-checks and functional outcomes, mortality, length of stay, or delirium. Although early assessments may aid prognostication, excessive exams may not improve outcomes and may contribute to harm. The heterogeneity, lack of evidence, and limited standardization of neuro-check frequency highlight the need for clinical research to guide future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146168612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000879
Amelia Tenberg, Mona N Bahouth, Catherine A Clair, Samantha N Curriero, Elizabeth K Zink, Martha Abshire Saylor
Background: Care partners experience multiple psychosocial and physiological stressors while supporting patients with stroke. We aimed to adapt an existing care partner-focused support program for skill building and psychosocial support. We sought to examine the implementation of the support program in an early-supported stroke discharge clinic and investigate the effects of the support program on care partner-reported mental health and burden. METHODS: The study followed a type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design. During the implementation phases, key stakeholders evaluated and adapted the support intervention for the stroke population and completed a prospective evaluation of care partner roles in the target stroke clinic. During the intervention phase, care partners participated in the support intervention per the parent study protocol. Implementation feasibility and acceptability were evaluated, and we evaluated care partner-reported measures of physical and mental health and burden measured at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: The support program was determined suitable for implementation in the target stroke clinic with a scaling-out implementation strategy. In the target stroke clinic, care partners primarily supported instrumental activities of daily living. Of 17 care partners enrolled in the support intervention, 12 completed baseline assessments. Participants who completed the intervention (n = 8) reported high satisfaction and acceptability of the program components, but some expressed concerns about the length of the surveys. Overall mental health scores increased, and burden decreased in both groups from baseline to 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: The support program adapted for care partners of patients after stroke was acceptable and feasible and has potential for benefit to physical and mental well-being and burden, though this pilot was not powered to detect significance of outcomes for participants. Scaling out may promote efficient use of limited care partner services in a health system.
{"title":"Implementing a Strengths-based Intervention to Support Stroke Care Partners: Proof of Concept.","authors":"Amelia Tenberg, Mona N Bahouth, Catherine A Clair, Samantha N Curriero, Elizabeth K Zink, Martha Abshire Saylor","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care partners experience multiple psychosocial and physiological stressors while supporting patients with stroke. We aimed to adapt an existing care partner-focused support program for skill building and psychosocial support. We sought to examine the implementation of the support program in an early-supported stroke discharge clinic and investigate the effects of the support program on care partner-reported mental health and burden. METHODS: The study followed a type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design. During the implementation phases, key stakeholders evaluated and adapted the support intervention for the stroke population and completed a prospective evaluation of care partner roles in the target stroke clinic. During the intervention phase, care partners participated in the support intervention per the parent study protocol. Implementation feasibility and acceptability were evaluated, and we evaluated care partner-reported measures of physical and mental health and burden measured at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS: The support program was determined suitable for implementation in the target stroke clinic with a scaling-out implementation strategy. In the target stroke clinic, care partners primarily supported instrumental activities of daily living. Of 17 care partners enrolled in the support intervention, 12 completed baseline assessments. Participants who completed the intervention (n = 8) reported high satisfaction and acceptability of the program components, but some expressed concerns about the length of the surveys. Overall mental health scores increased, and burden decreased in both groups from baseline to 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: The support program adapted for care partners of patients after stroke was acceptable and feasible and has potential for benefit to physical and mental well-being and burden, though this pilot was not powered to detect significance of outcomes for participants. Scaling out may promote efficient use of limited care partner services in a health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146145467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000866
Tammy L Tyree
Background: There are 2 mainstays of therapy for malignant or aggressive brain tumors that are effective in controlling growth: systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and chemotherapy and radiation including brachytherapy. Prior versions of brain brachytherapy have proven challenging to use due to adverse effects, resulting in limited application of this therapy. The most recent development in brain brachytherapy is a tile-based radioactive device, GammaTile®, that is implanted at the time of tumor removal. GammaTile is FDA-approved for malignant brain tumors as well as recurrent brain tumors and addresses all the nuances of prior versions. This literature review provides neuroscience nurses with a working understanding of tile-based brain brachytherapy. METHODS: Searches were conducted across multiple medical databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCO, using combinations of keywords related to brachytherapy, GammaTile, and brain tumors to identify relevant background and descriptive literature, and using combinations of keywords, nursing care, brachytherapy, brain, head, and malignancies, to identify relevant nursing care literature. RESULTS: Fifteen recently published articles were deemed relevant to provide neuroscience nurses with a working knowledge of tile-based brain brachytherapy. Literature on the nursing care of patients receiving tile-based brain brachytherapy is scarce, and only 2 articles published within the past 40 years specific to nursing care of patients receiving brain brachytherapy were discoverable. CONCLUSION: As the number of GammaTile cases and centers across the country continue to mount, neuroscience nurses need to have a working knowledge of this type of tile-based brain brachytherapy. There are significant differences in the care of patients after implantation of tile-based radiation therapy like GammaTile compared with prior brachytherapy products. These differences have implications for nurse and patient safety and patient/family education.
{"title":"GammaTile: The Newest Innovation in Brain Brachytherapy.","authors":"Tammy L Tyree","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000866","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are 2 mainstays of therapy for malignant or aggressive brain tumors that are effective in controlling growth: systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and chemotherapy and radiation including brachytherapy. Prior versions of brain brachytherapy have proven challenging to use due to adverse effects, resulting in limited application of this therapy. The most recent development in brain brachytherapy is a tile-based radioactive device, GammaTile®, that is implanted at the time of tumor removal. GammaTile is FDA-approved for malignant brain tumors as well as recurrent brain tumors and addresses all the nuances of prior versions. This literature review provides neuroscience nurses with a working understanding of tile-based brain brachytherapy. METHODS: Searches were conducted across multiple medical databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCO, using combinations of keywords related to brachytherapy, GammaTile, and brain tumors to identify relevant background and descriptive literature, and using combinations of keywords, nursing care, brachytherapy, brain, head, and malignancies, to identify relevant nursing care literature. RESULTS: Fifteen recently published articles were deemed relevant to provide neuroscience nurses with a working knowledge of tile-based brain brachytherapy. Literature on the nursing care of patients receiving tile-based brain brachytherapy is scarce, and only 2 articles published within the past 40 years specific to nursing care of patients receiving brain brachytherapy were discoverable. CONCLUSION: As the number of GammaTile cases and centers across the country continue to mount, neuroscience nurses need to have a working knowledge of this type of tile-based brain brachytherapy. There are significant differences in the care of patients after implantation of tile-based radiation therapy like GammaTile compared with prior brachytherapy products. These differences have implications for nurse and patient safety and patient/family education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145992433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000869
Sarah Alzahid, Jerry Armah, Ivan Rocha Ferreira Da Silva, Yingwei Yao, Lakeshia Cousin, Tamara G R Macieira, Staja Q Booker
Background: Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a chronic neurological condition that results from damage to the brain's pain-processing pathways and causes hypersensitivity to pain. Despite its clinical importance, yet remains underrecognized, its estimated prevalence ranges from 8% to 35%. OBJECTIVE:This study examines the prevalence of CPSP and explores demographic and comorbidity differences among stroke survivors. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used de-identified data from electronic health records from a large academic health center in the North Central Florida region (2014-2024). International Classification of Diseases-9 and International Classification of Diseases-10 codes were used to identify ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and CPSP. Descriptive statistics, χ2, t test, and multivariable logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of 32,155 adult patients, only 99 (0.31%) were diagnosed with CPSP. The odds of being diagnosed with CPSP were higher in patients with ischemic stroke than hemorrhagic [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.19-3.37, P = .009]. The mean age of CPSP patients was 59 years (SD = 13.1), significantly younger than those without CPSP (M = 64, P = .001), with no difference in sex distribution. Black patients (AOR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74, P = .001) and Hispanic patients (AOR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.49-7.31, P = .003) both had significantly higher odds of a documented CPSP diagnosis compared with white and non-Hispanic patients. Hypertension (74.8%) was the most common comorbidity among patients with CPSP, while only atrial fibrillation was significantly less prevalent (P = .006) in the CPSP group. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a low prevalence of CPSP in patients who have experienced stroke. The prevalence of documented poststroke pain was substantially lower than published estimates suggest. Further investigation is needed to understand the experience of CPSP in younger, black, Hispanic, and multimorbidity populations.
背景:中枢性卒中后疼痛(CPSP)是一种慢性神经系统疾病,由大脑疼痛处理通路的损伤引起,并引起对疼痛的超敏反应。尽管其临床重要性仍未得到充分认识,但其估计患病率在8%至35%之间。目的:本研究考察了卒中幸存者中CPSP的患病率,并探讨了人口统计学和合并症的差异。方法:这项回顾性、横断面研究使用了来自佛罗里达州中北部地区一家大型学术卫生中心的电子健康记录(2014-2024年)的去识别数据。使用《国际疾病分类-9》和《国际疾病分类-10》编码识别缺血性卒中、出血性卒中和CPSP。采用描述性统计、χ2、t检验和多变量logistic回归进行统计分析。结果:32155例成人患者中,只有99例(0.31%)被诊断为CPSP。缺血性卒中患者被诊断为CPSP的几率高于出血性卒中患者[校正优势比(AOR) = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.19-3.37, P = 0.009]。CPSP患者的平均年龄为59岁(SD = 13.1),明显低于无CPSP患者(M = 64, P = .001),性别分布无差异。黑人患者(AOR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74, P = .001)和西班牙裔患者(AOR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.49-7.31, P = .003)与白人和非西班牙裔患者相比,确诊CPSP的几率明显更高。高血压(74.8%)是CPSP患者中最常见的共病,而在CPSP组中,只有房颤的发生率显著降低(P = 0.006)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,卒中患者的CPSP患病率较低。记录在案的中风后疼痛的患病率大大低于公布的估计。需要进一步的调查来了解年轻、黑人、西班牙裔和多病人群的CPSP经验。
{"title":"Prevalence of and Demographic Differences in Central Poststroke Pain Syndrome in a Large Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Sarah Alzahid, Jerry Armah, Ivan Rocha Ferreira Da Silva, Yingwei Yao, Lakeshia Cousin, Tamara G R Macieira, Staja Q Booker","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000869","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a chronic neurological condition that results from damage to the brain's pain-processing pathways and causes hypersensitivity to pain. Despite its clinical importance, yet remains underrecognized, its estimated prevalence ranges from 8% to 35%. OBJECTIVE:This study examines the prevalence of CPSP and explores demographic and comorbidity differences among stroke survivors. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used de-identified data from electronic health records from a large academic health center in the North Central Florida region (2014-2024). International Classification of Diseases-9 and International Classification of Diseases-10 codes were used to identify ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and CPSP. Descriptive statistics, χ2, t test, and multivariable logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of 32,155 adult patients, only 99 (0.31%) were diagnosed with CPSP. The odds of being diagnosed with CPSP were higher in patients with ischemic stroke than hemorrhagic [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.19-3.37, P = .009]. The mean age of CPSP patients was 59 years (SD = 13.1), significantly younger than those without CPSP (M = 64, P = .001), with no difference in sex distribution. Black patients (AOR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74, P = .001) and Hispanic patients (AOR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.49-7.31, P = .003) both had significantly higher odds of a documented CPSP diagnosis compared with white and non-Hispanic patients. Hypertension (74.8%) was the most common comorbidity among patients with CPSP, while only atrial fibrillation was significantly less prevalent (P = .006) in the CPSP group. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate a low prevalence of CPSP in patients who have experienced stroke. The prevalence of documented poststroke pain was substantially lower than published estimates suggest. Further investigation is needed to understand the experience of CPSP in younger, black, Hispanic, and multimorbidity populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145968151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}