Background: Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is rare among traumatic aortic injuries, and further complications of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) have never been reported.
Case presentation: A man in his 80s presented to our hospital following a motor vehicle accident. Pan-scan contrast-enhanced CT showed a thoracic aortic isthmus injury (Grade III), an abdominal aortic injury (Grade IV) with extravasation of contrast media at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra. Endovascular abdominal aortic repair was performed on the same day and a thoracic endovascular aortic repair for BTAI was performed 11 days after admission. The patient had a good postoperative course and was discharged without complications.
Conclusion: This report presented a rare case of BTAI complicated with BAAI. The timing of intervention for aortic injury should be determined based on urgency and other organ damage.
{"title":"Blunt Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Injury in Multiple Trauma: A Case Report.","authors":"Seishiro Akinaga, Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Toshiaki Mishima, Kagami Miyaji, Yasushi Asari","doi":"10.1177/15385744241296214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241296214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) is rare among traumatic aortic injuries, and further complications of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) have never been reported.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A man in his 80s presented to our hospital following a motor vehicle accident. Pan-scan contrast-enhanced CT showed a thoracic aortic isthmus injury (Grade III), an abdominal aortic injury (Grade IV) with extravasation of contrast media at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra. Endovascular abdominal aortic repair was performed on the same day and a thoracic endovascular aortic repair for BTAI was performed 11 days after admission. The patient had a good postoperative course and was discharged without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This report presented a rare case of BTAI complicated with BAAI. The timing of intervention for aortic injury should be determined based on urgency and other organ damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1177/15385744241296217
Deena B Chihade, Zachary E Williams, Brandon S Wainwright, Palma M Shaw
Objective: During the pandemic, our institution anecdotally observed a significant proportion of acute limb ischemia (ALI) patients developing compartment syndrome (CS) following revascularization compared to pre-pandemic rates. To determine whether this perceived increase was occurring globally, we utilized the TriNetX database to evaluate the incidence of CS secondary to ALI intervention in both the pre-pandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic eras (2020-2022).
Methods: We conducted a multicenter query using the TriNetX global research network for ALI patients receiving treatment. Incidence of CS diagnosis within 1 calendar day of ALI intervention was calculated for each era. Demographics and comorbidities were then compared between CS and non-CS patients within each era. Risk of adverse outcomes within 30 days of CS diagnosis was also determined for each era, including mortality, major amputation, and re-intervention.
Results: The pre-pandemic cohort contained 7736 patients while the pandemic era cohort included 8,306, for 16,042 total patients. A significant increase in CS incidence (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23, P = 0.0026) was demonstrated within the pandemic era. An increased prevalence of comorbidities such as dyslipidemia (pre-pandemic: P = 0.0022; pandemic: P = 0.0026) and peripheral vascular disease (P < 0.0001, both eras) was observed in the non-CS cohort within both eras. 30-day mortality was significantly increased in CS patients (pre-pandemic: RR = 3.057; pandemic: RR = 2.710; P < 0.0001 both eras) compared to non-CS patients. CS patients were more likely to receive major amputation (pre-pandemic: RR = 3.734; pandemic: RR = 2.809; P < 0.0001 both eras) and/or re-intervention within 30 days (pre-pandemic: RR = 1.871, P < 0.0001; pandemic: RR = 1.370, P = 0.0218) over non-CS patients.
Conclusions: The incidence of CS following revascularization for ALI rose worldwide during the pandemic. Patients who developed CS are younger with fewer comorbidities than non-CS patients. Despite a more favorable comorbid profile, CS patients demonstrate significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to determine the specific underlying mechanisms driving this increased incidence in CS among ALI patients.
{"title":"Incidence of Compartment Syndrome Following Peri-Pandemic Intervention for Non-traumatic Acute Limb Ischemia.","authors":"Deena B Chihade, Zachary E Williams, Brandon S Wainwright, Palma M Shaw","doi":"10.1177/15385744241296217","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241296217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the pandemic, our institution anecdotally observed a significant proportion of acute limb ischemia (ALI) patients developing compartment syndrome (CS) following revascularization compared to pre-pandemic rates. To determine whether this perceived increase was occurring globally, we utilized the TriNetX database to evaluate the incidence of CS secondary to ALI intervention in both the pre-pandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic eras (2020-2022).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter query using the TriNetX global research network for ALI patients receiving treatment. Incidence of CS diagnosis within 1 calendar day of ALI intervention was calculated for each era. Demographics and comorbidities were then compared between CS and non-CS patients within each era. Risk of adverse outcomes within 30 days of CS diagnosis was also determined for each era, including mortality, major amputation, and re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-pandemic cohort contained 7736 patients while the pandemic era cohort included 8,306, for 16,042 total patients. A significant increase in CS incidence (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23, <i>P</i> = 0.0026) was demonstrated within the pandemic era. An increased prevalence of comorbidities such as dyslipidemia (pre-pandemic: <i>P</i> = 0.0022; pandemic: <i>P</i> = 0.0026) and peripheral vascular disease (<i>P</i> < 0.0001, both eras) was observed in the non-CS cohort within both eras. 30-day mortality was significantly increased in CS patients (pre-pandemic: RR = 3.057; pandemic: RR = 2.710; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 both eras) compared to non-CS patients. CS patients were more likely to receive major amputation (pre-pandemic: RR = 3.734; pandemic: RR = 2.809; <i>P</i> < 0.0001 both eras) and/or re-intervention within 30 days (pre-pandemic: RR = 1.871, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; pandemic: RR = 1.370, <i>P</i> = 0.0218) over non-CS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of CS following revascularization for ALI rose worldwide during the pandemic. Patients who developed CS are younger with fewer comorbidities than non-CS patients. Despite a more favorable comorbid profile, CS patients demonstrate significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to determine the specific underlying mechanisms driving this increased incidence in CS among ALI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-20DOI: 10.1177/15385744241296218
Renxi Li, Qianyun Luo, Stephen J Huddleston
Background: Depression is highly prevalent in patients with aortic diseases. While depression has been shown to predispose patients to adverse outcomes after surgery, its impact on postoperative outcomes in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) has not been established. This study aimed to conduct a population-based examination of the effect of preoperative depression on in-hospital outcomes after TAAD using the National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest all-layer database in the US.
Methods: Patients undergoing TAAD repair were identified in NIS from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without preoperative depression, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer status.
Results: There were 321 (7.50%) patients with depression and 3961 (92.50%) non-depressive patients who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without depression had comparable in-hospital mortality (11.84% vs 15.37%, P = 0.35). However, Patients with depression had a higher risk of hemorrhage/hematoma (83.49% vs 76.6%, aOR 1.593, 95 CI 1.161-2.184, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of transfer out (40.81% vs 32.62%, aOR 1.396, 95 CI 1.077-1.81, P = 0.01). All other in-hospital complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge were comparable between patients with and without depression.
Conclusion: Preoperative depression is associated with a higher risk of bleeding after TAAD repair. This may be due to anti-depression treatment, such as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), that can disrupt platelet function and lead to abnormal bleeding. While depression is not associated with other major outcomes, preoperative depression screening, as well as hemostatic monitoring and appropriate blood management in patients with depression may be crucial in preventing bleeding complications in TAAD repair.
背景:抑郁症在主动脉疾病患者中非常普遍。虽然抑郁症已被证明会导致患者术后出现不良预后,但其对斯坦福A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)患者术后预后的影响尚未确定。本研究旨在利用美国最大的全层数据库--国家/全国住院病人抽样(NIS)数据库,对术前抑郁对TAAD术后院内预后的影响进行基于人群的研究:方法:从2015-2020年最后一个季度的NIS中识别出接受TAAD修复术的患者。经人口统计学、合并症、医院特征、主要付款人状态和转院状态调整后,采用多变量逻辑回归比较术前抑郁和无抑郁患者的院内结局:接受 TAAD 修复术的抑郁症患者有 321 人(7.50%),非抑郁症患者有 3961 人(92.50%)。抑郁症患者和非抑郁症患者的院内死亡率相当(11.84% vs 15.37%,P = 0.35)。然而,抑郁症患者发生出血/血肿的风险更高(83.49% vs 76.6%,aOR 1.593,95 CI 1.161-2.184,P <0.01),转院率更高(40.81% vs 32.62%,aOR 1.396,95 CI 1.077-1.81,P =0.01)。所有其他院内并发症、住院时间(LOS)和住院总费用在有抑郁症和没有抑郁症的患者之间不相上下:结论:术前抑郁与 TAAD 修复术后出血风险较高有关。结论:术前抑郁与 TAAD 修复术后出血风险较高有关,这可能是由于抗抑郁治疗(如选择性羟色胺再摄取抑制剂 (SSRI))会破坏血小板功能并导致异常出血。虽然抑郁症与其他主要结果无关,但对抑郁症患者进行术前抑郁筛查、止血监测和适当的血液管理可能是预防 TAAD 修复术出血并发症的关键。
{"title":"Preoperative Depression is Associated With a Higher Risk of Bleeding in Type a Aortic Dissection Repair: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample From 2015-2020.","authors":"Renxi Li, Qianyun Luo, Stephen J Huddleston","doi":"10.1177/15385744241296218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241296218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is highly prevalent in patients with aortic diseases. While depression has been shown to predispose patients to adverse outcomes after surgery, its impact on postoperative outcomes in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) has not been established. This study aimed to conduct a population-based examination of the effect of preoperative depression on in-hospital outcomes after TAAD using the National/Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest all-layer database in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing TAAD repair were identified in NIS from the last quarter of 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without preoperative depression, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 321 (7.50%) patients with depression and 3961 (92.50%) non-depressive patients who underwent TAAD repair. Patients with and without depression had comparable in-hospital mortality (11.84% vs 15.37%, <i>P</i> = 0.35). However, Patients with depression had a higher risk of hemorrhage/hematoma (83.49% vs 76.6%, aOR 1.593, 95 CI 1.161-2.184, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and a higher rate of transfer out (40.81% vs 32.62%, aOR 1.396, 95 CI 1.077-1.81, <i>P</i> = 0.01). All other in-hospital complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge were comparable between patients with and without depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative depression is associated with a higher risk of bleeding after TAAD repair. This may be due to anti-depression treatment, such as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), that can disrupt platelet function and lead to abnormal bleeding. While depression is not associated with other major outcomes, preoperative depression screening, as well as hemostatic monitoring and appropriate blood management in patients with depression may be crucial in preventing bleeding complications in TAAD repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-17DOI: 10.1177/15385744241293252
Amber Ahmed-Issap, Mukesh Garg, Richard Warwick, Muhammad Kabeer, Abdel Kader Allouni, Arun Pherwani
Subclavian artery aneurysms are extremely rare, accounting for less than 1% all of peripheral aneurysms. They are often due to atherosclerosis or thoracic outlet syndrome and present at an average age of 47 years. Here, we present an incidental finding of an 18 mm rapidly increasing aneurysm involving the first and second part of the right subclavian artery in a woman in her 20s. To our knowledge, this is the youngest patient presenting with a right subclavian artery aneurysm who underwent surgical resection of the aneurysm with repair using interposition graft and successful re-implantation of the vertebral artery with antegrade flow. This report highlights the multidisciplinary care between vascular, interventional radiology and cardiothoracic teams at our tertiary hospital due to the complex nature of the aneurysm.
{"title":"Large Right Subclavian Artery Aneurysm Presenting in a Young Patient.","authors":"Amber Ahmed-Issap, Mukesh Garg, Richard Warwick, Muhammad Kabeer, Abdel Kader Allouni, Arun Pherwani","doi":"10.1177/15385744241293252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241293252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subclavian artery aneurysms are extremely rare, accounting for less than 1% all of peripheral aneurysms. They are often due to atherosclerosis or thoracic outlet syndrome and present at an average age of 47 years. Here, we present an incidental finding of an 18 mm rapidly increasing aneurysm involving the first and second part of the right subclavian artery in a woman in her 20s. To our knowledge, this is the youngest patient presenting with a right subclavian artery aneurysm who underwent surgical resection of the aneurysm with repair using interposition graft and successful re-implantation of the vertebral artery with antegrade flow. This report highlights the multidisciplinary care between vascular, interventional radiology and cardiothoracic teams at our tertiary hospital due to the complex nature of the aneurysm.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292861
Allen Gee, Arthur Tarricone, Lawrence A Lavery, Karlo A Wiley, Noell Palmieri, Samin Sharma, Prakash Krishnan
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the current literature of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in real world cohorts inclusive of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients and compare the outcomes to patients imaged by angiography alone.
Methods: The systematic review was registered in Research Registry. A literature search was performed across 4 databases: PubMed, Medline/Embase, Cochrane Review, and Web of Science for eligible comparative studies. The primary outcomes examined were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), amputation (including minor below the ankle and major above the ankle), all-cause mortality, limb salvage and mean balloon dilation. A random effects model was used when pooling outcomes to account for heterogeneity. Publication bias was determined using eggers test and illustrated on a funnel plot.
Main findings: Six studies were included in this review, with a total of 1883 subjects with Rutherford 1-6. Among the 1883 subjects, 940 had Rutherford 4-6. IVUS was used in 1294 subjects and angiography alone was used in 589 subjects. Pooled analysis determined no significant association in IVUS + angiography with CD-TLR (O.R = 1.43 [CI: 0.80, 2.58]), all-cause amputation (O.R = 0.63 [CI: 0.34, 1.17]), and all-cause mortality (O.R = 0.63 [CI: 0.34, 1.17]). Sub analysis of subjects with CLTI, Rutherford classes 4-6 showed an association between IVUS + angiography use with limb salvage at 1 year, O.R = 2.22 [1.24, 3.97].
Conclusion: The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone showed larger reference vessel diameter in both all-inclusive Rutherford classifications and the CLTI subset. The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone showed no difference in CD-TLR at 12 months, lower extremity amputation, and all-cause mortality for Rutherford 1-6. The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone in the CLTI subset analysis improved limb salvage.
{"title":"The Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in Limb Salvage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Allen Gee, Arthur Tarricone, Lawrence A Lavery, Karlo A Wiley, Noell Palmieri, Samin Sharma, Prakash Krishnan","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292861","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to review the current literature of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in real world cohorts inclusive of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients and compare the outcomes to patients imaged by angiography alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was registered in Research Registry. A literature search was performed across 4 databases: PubMed, Medline/Embase, Cochrane Review, and Web of Science for eligible comparative studies. The primary outcomes examined were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), amputation (including minor below the ankle and major above the ankle), all-cause mortality, limb salvage and mean balloon dilation. A random effects model was used when pooling outcomes to account for heterogeneity. Publication bias was determined using eggers test and illustrated on a funnel plot.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>Six studies were included in this review, with a total of 1883 subjects with Rutherford 1-6. Among the 1883 subjects, 940 had Rutherford 4-6. IVUS was used in 1294 subjects and angiography alone was used in 589 subjects. Pooled analysis determined no significant association in IVUS + angiography with CD-TLR (O.R = 1.43 [CI: 0.80, 2.58]), all-cause amputation (O.R = 0.63 [CI: 0.34, 1.17]), and all-cause mortality (O.R = 0.63 [CI: 0.34, 1.17]). Sub analysis of subjects with CLTI, Rutherford classes 4-6 showed an association between IVUS + angiography use with limb salvage at 1 year, O.R = 2.22 [1.24, 3.97].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone showed larger reference vessel diameter in both all-inclusive Rutherford classifications and the CLTI subset. The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone showed no difference in CD-TLR at 12 months, lower extremity amputation, and all-cause mortality for Rutherford 1-6. The use of IVUS + angiography compared to angiography alone in the CLTI subset analysis improved limb salvage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1177/15385744241291083
May Dvir, Fahad Shuja, Indrani Sen, Carmelina Gurrieri, Thomas Carmody, Tiziano Tallarita
Treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the infrarenal aorta poses several challenges. Traditionally, open surgery has been the preferred method of treatment in standard risk patients, although, it is burdened by high morbidity and mortality. There are many classifications to establish the patient risk for surgery. Among the most common is the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) classification. ACC/AHA high-risk patients benefit from the increase in endovascular technology and skills. The treatment modality of atherosclerotic aortic disease has shifted towards a minimally invasive approach, including kissing stents, covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) and, aorto-uniiliac stent grafts. When there is an involvement of vital branches such as the inferior mesenteric (with concomitant occluded superior mesenteric artery) or the renal arteries, Chimney- CERAB technique has been successfully utilized to overcome this challenge. We present three patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) successfully treated with the chimney- CERAB technique to preserve a large inferior mesenteric artery in the setting of occlusion/near occlusion of the other mesenteric vessels.
{"title":"Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aorto-Iliac Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease With Chimney Covered Endovascular Reconstruction of Aortic Bifurcation.","authors":"May Dvir, Fahad Shuja, Indrani Sen, Carmelina Gurrieri, Thomas Carmody, Tiziano Tallarita","doi":"10.1177/15385744241291083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241291083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the infrarenal aorta poses several challenges. Traditionally, open surgery has been the preferred method of treatment in standard risk patients, although, it is burdened by high morbidity and mortality. There are many classifications to establish the patient risk for surgery. Among the most common is the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) classification. ACC/AHA high-risk patients benefit from the increase in endovascular technology and skills. The treatment modality of atherosclerotic aortic disease has shifted towards a minimally invasive approach, including kissing stents, covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) and, aorto-uniiliac stent grafts. When there is an involvement of vital branches such as the inferior mesenteric (with concomitant occluded superior mesenteric artery) or the renal arteries, Chimney- CERAB technique has been successfully utilized to overcome this challenge. We present three patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) successfully treated with the chimney- CERAB technique to preserve a large inferior mesenteric artery in the setting of occlusion/near occlusion of the other mesenteric vessels.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292109
Avital Simone, Lauren Carmon, Priya Rao, Meghan Cichocki, Karen Yuan, Matthew Blecha, Carlos F Bechara, Michael C Soult
Objective: Endovascular infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has proven to be an effective, less invasive alternative to open aortic aneurysm repair with decreased 30-day mortality. Historically, urinary drainage catheters were routinely placed preoperatively before EVAR in our institution. A shift to reduced catheter placement has occurred in conjunction with percutaneous EVARs becoming more routine. Urethral catheterization carries risk of infection (UTI), urinary retention and prostatic trauma inducing hematuria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether avoidance of urinary catheter placement during EVAR is an effective practice to reduce cost and morbidity.
Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 177 consecutive patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR. Ruptured aneurysms and emergent EVAR were excluded. The study end points were postoperative UTI, urinary retention, length of stay, and readmission within 30 days. Univariable analysis was performed for these four outcomes in patients with (N = 92 and without (N = 65) preoperative urinary catheter placement. A more expansive multivariable investigation for risk of urinary retention following EVAR was conducted with binary logistic regression with co-variates including age, sex, femoral cutdown, estimated blood loss (EBL), urinary catheter, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and postoperative urinary retention as co-variates.
Results: Patients who had a Urinary catheter placed had an over two fold higher event rate of urinary retention (10.9% vs 4.6%) This urinary retention trend lacked power to reach significance (OR 2.52 (.665-9.55). Placement of urinary catheter also had a strong trend towards increased rate of UTI but lacking power for significance (7.6% vs 3.10%, OR 1.96 (.556-6.57). There was no difference with or without urinary catheter placement regarding 30-day readmission (yes catheter 7.6% vs no catheter 6.2%, P = .725), or length of stay (yes catheter 2.13 days vs no catheter 1.74 days, P = .723). Urinary retention was significantly associated with the development of a UTI with 23% of patients who had retention developing UTI compared with 4.2% of patients without retention developing UTI (adjusted odds ratio = 17.98, P = .019). Increased blood loss (P = .027) was also associated with increased rate of UTI on multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: Avoidance of preoperative urinary catheter placement displays a trend towards avoiding urinary retention and UTI. Patients who develop post EVAR urinary retention experience a significantly increased rate of UTI. Selective urinary catheter placement should be used to help reduce urinary-related complications following elective EVAR.
{"title":"Routine Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Not Necessary.","authors":"Avital Simone, Lauren Carmon, Priya Rao, Meghan Cichocki, Karen Yuan, Matthew Blecha, Carlos F Bechara, Michael C Soult","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292109","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endovascular infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has proven to be an effective, less invasive alternative to open aortic aneurysm repair with decreased 30-day mortality. Historically, urinary drainage catheters were routinely placed preoperatively before EVAR in our institution. A shift to reduced catheter placement has occurred in conjunction with percutaneous EVARs becoming more routine. Urethral catheterization carries risk of infection (UTI), urinary retention and prostatic trauma inducing hematuria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether avoidance of urinary catheter placement during EVAR is an effective practice to reduce cost and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 177 consecutive patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR. Ruptured aneurysms and emergent EVAR were excluded. The study end points were postoperative UTI, urinary retention, length of stay, and readmission within 30 days. Univariable analysis was performed for these four outcomes in patients with (N = 92 and without (N = 65) preoperative urinary catheter placement. A more expansive multivariable investigation for risk of urinary retention following EVAR was conducted with binary logistic regression with co-variates including age, sex, femoral cutdown, estimated blood loss (EBL), urinary catheter, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and postoperative urinary retention as co-variates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who had a Urinary catheter placed had an over two fold higher event rate of urinary retention (10.9% vs 4.6%) This urinary retention trend lacked power to reach significance (OR 2.52 (.665-9.55). Placement of urinary catheter also had a strong trend towards increased rate of UTI but lacking power for significance (7.6% vs 3.10%, OR 1.96 (.556-6.57). There was no difference with or without urinary catheter placement regarding 30-day readmission (yes catheter 7.6% vs no catheter 6.2%, <i>P</i> = .725), or length of stay (yes catheter 2.13 days vs no catheter 1.74 days, <i>P</i> = .723). Urinary retention was significantly associated with the development of a UTI with 23% of patients who had retention developing UTI compared with 4.2% of patients without retention developing UTI (adjusted odds ratio = 17.98, <i>P</i> = .019). Increased blood loss (<i>P</i> = .027) was also associated with increased rate of UTI on multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Avoidance of preoperative urinary catheter placement displays a trend towards avoiding urinary retention and UTI. Patients who develop post EVAR urinary retention experience a significantly increased rate of UTI. Selective urinary catheter placement should be used to help reduce urinary-related complications following elective EVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290007
Suvi Väärämäki, Olli Hautero, Vesa Rajala, Pasi Nevalainen
Objectives: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a rare metabolic disease, causing calcification in the arterial media layer and further peripheral artery disease (PAD). A high rate of failure has been reported after endovascular and open surgical management of PAD among patients with PXE. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) rarely develops in PXE, and there are only few reports of its treatment.
Methods: We present a case report of a 57 year-old female diagnosed with pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). She presented with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and was successfully treated with pedal bypass using the great saphenous vein.
Results: Despite obtaining suboptimal outcomes through the initial approach of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat critical limb ischemia, the subsequent bypass operation proved to be a success. At the first follow-up appointment at 1 month, the patient was asymptomatic and the ulceration had almost healed. The patient underwent an ultrasound examination at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge, and the surveillance was uncomplicated.
Conclusions: With a clear indication for surgery, limb-threatening ischemia can be successfully treated with distal bypass, if necessary, in patients with PXE similarly to atherosclerotic PADs. Appropriate diagnostic and surveillance imaging and the utilization of a multidisciplinary team are key components for effective management of PAD in patients with PXE.
目的:假黄疽弹性瘤(PXE)是一种罕见的代谢性疾病,会导致动脉介质层钙化,进一步引发外周动脉疾病(PAD)。据报道,PXE 患者在接受血管内和开放手术治疗 PAD 后,失败率很高。PXE患者很少出现严重肢体缺血(CLI),关于其治疗方法的报道也寥寥无几:我们报告了一例 57 岁女性假黄瘤患者的病例。她出现了严重的肢体缺血(CLI),并成功地通过大隐静脉进行了足部搭桥治疗:结果:尽管最初采用经皮腔内血管成形术治疗危重肢体缺血的效果并不理想,但随后的搭桥手术证明是成功的。在1个月后的首次复诊中,患者没有任何症状,溃疡也基本愈合。患者在出院后3、6、12和24个月分别接受了超声波检查,监测结果均无异常:结论:在有明确手术指征的情况下,PXE 患者与动脉粥样硬化性 PAD 患者一样,必要时可通过远端搭桥手术成功治疗危及肢体的缺血。适当的诊断和监测成像以及利用多学科团队是有效治疗 PXE 患者 PAD 的关键要素。
{"title":"Successful Pedal Bypass in a Patient With Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum.","authors":"Suvi Väärämäki, Olli Hautero, Vesa Rajala, Pasi Nevalainen","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a rare metabolic disease, causing calcification in the arterial media layer and further peripheral artery disease (PAD). A high rate of failure has been reported after endovascular and open surgical management of PAD among patients with PXE. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) rarely develops in PXE, and there are only few reports of its treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a case report of a 57 year-old female diagnosed with pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). She presented with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and was successfully treated with pedal bypass using the great saphenous vein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite obtaining suboptimal outcomes through the initial approach of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat critical limb ischemia, the subsequent bypass operation proved to be a success. At the first follow-up appointment at 1 month, the patient was asymptomatic and the ulceration had almost healed. The patient underwent an ultrasound examination at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge, and the surveillance was uncomplicated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a clear indication for surgery, limb-threatening ischemia can be successfully treated with distal bypass, if necessary, in patients with PXE similarly to atherosclerotic PADs. Appropriate diagnostic and surveillance imaging and the utilization of a multidisciplinary team are key components for effective management of PAD in patients with PXE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-12DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292115
Wendeng Xu, Yi Shen, Ye Wang, Bin Liang, Jian Wu, Xiaofeng Zhang
Background and purpose: Stenting appears to be a safe treatment for vertebral artery ostial stenosis (VAOS) with low complication rates and positive long-term effects. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting is common. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an effective management strategy for ISR in patients with coronary or carotid disease. In this study, we investigated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of DCB-assisted angioplasty for the treatment of ISR after treatment of VAOS. Research Design: The study included patients in the Department of Neurology at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital who underwent DCB-assisted angioplasty for ISR after previously undergoing stenting for VAOS. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and functional outcomes in these patients. Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study between January 2018 and April 2022. Five of the patients were female, and the mean age was 69.4 ± 7.5 years. The technical success rate was 100% and the mean operation time was 57.1 ± 29.2 minutes. No perioperative complications were reported. There were no new cases of cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attacks in hospital or during 6 months of follow-up. There were only 2 reports of ISR in the vertebral artery ostium in the 6 months following DCB-assisted angioplasty. The median modified Rankin scale score was 0. Conclusion: DCB-assisted angioplasty may be feasible for treatment of ISR after stenting of the vertebral artery ostium. However, more research is needed to confirm our findings.
{"title":"Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis in the Vertebral Artery Ostium: Experiences From a Single Center.","authors":"Wendeng Xu, Yi Shen, Ye Wang, Bin Liang, Jian Wu, Xiaofeng Zhang","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and purpose:</b> Stenting appears to be a safe treatment for vertebral artery ostial stenosis (VAOS) with low complication rates and positive long-term effects. However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting is common. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an effective management strategy for ISR in patients with coronary or carotid disease. In this study, we investigated the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of DCB-assisted angioplasty for the treatment of ISR after treatment of VAOS. <b>Research Design:</b> The study included patients in the Department of Neurology at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital who underwent DCB-assisted angioplasty for ISR after previously undergoing stenting for VAOS. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and functional outcomes in these patients. <b>Results:</b> Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study between January 2018 and April 2022. Five of the patients were female, and the mean age was 69.4 ± 7.5 years. The technical success rate was 100% and the mean operation time was 57.1 ± 29.2 minutes. No perioperative complications were reported. There were no new cases of cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attacks in hospital or during 6 months of follow-up. There were only 2 reports of ISR in the vertebral artery ostium in the 6 months following DCB-assisted angioplasty. The median modified Rankin scale score was 0. <b>Conclusion:</b> DCB-assisted angioplasty may be feasible for treatment of ISR after stenting of the vertebral artery ostium. However, more research is needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In recent years, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has become a primary modality of therapy in moderate-high risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although clinicians remain vigilant about screening for both aortic stenosis, many patients still, nevertheless, often present only when they are symptomatic. Unfortunately, when isolated TAVR is performed in the context of hostile aortic pathology, it has been reported that patients suffer from higher rates of complications such as rupture, dissection, or death post-operatively.
Objectives: To explore the utility of a simultaneous TAVR and endovascular aortic repair in addressing symptomatic aortic stenosis in challenging patients with hostile aortic pathology.
Methods: Retrospective case series within a tertiary care hospital between May 2017 and December 2023.
Results: A total of 11 patients underwent simultaneous endovascular aortic repair and TAVR. TAVR was performed first in 9/11 (82%) of the procedures while endovascular aortic repair was performed first in 2/11 procedures (18%). The median age was 84 years old (IQR = 77-86 years old). The median LOS was 3 days (IQR = 2-10 days). The median procedure time was 155 minutes (IQR = 111-202 minutes) and the median contrast amount was 100 CC (IQR = 65-139 CC). 2 patients (18%) experienced post-operative complications. Both of these patients required re-intervention. This cohort of patients did not experience any mortality at 30 days related to pertinent complications or adverse MACE events. All patients were transferred to the PACU and ultimately discharged home.
Conclusions: Extending TAVR eligibility to high-risk patients with hostile aortic pathology through the implementation of simultaneous endovascular aortic repair, performed via the same access site, is an effective strategy for management of symptomatic aortic stenosis in the context of extensive cardiovascular co-morbidities.
{"title":"Simultaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair Expands Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eligibility to Patients With Hostile Aortic Pathology.","authors":"Jeffrey Lu, Benjamin Zambetti, Joshua Plant, Anuj Gupta, Khanjan Nagarsheth, Shahab Toursavadkohi","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has become a primary modality of therapy in moderate-high risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Although clinicians remain vigilant about screening for both aortic stenosis, many patients still, nevertheless, often present only when they are symptomatic. Unfortunately, when isolated TAVR is performed in the context of hostile aortic pathology, it has been reported that patients suffer from higher rates of complications such as rupture, dissection, or death post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the utility of a simultaneous TAVR and endovascular aortic repair in addressing symptomatic aortic stenosis in challenging patients with hostile aortic pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective case series within a tertiary care hospital between May 2017 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 patients underwent simultaneous endovascular aortic repair and TAVR. TAVR was performed first in 9/11 (82%) of the procedures while endovascular aortic repair was performed first in 2/11 procedures (18%). The median age was 84 years old (IQR = 77-86 years old). The median LOS was 3 days (IQR = 2-10 days). The median procedure time was 155 minutes (IQR = 111-202 minutes) and the median contrast amount was 100 CC (IQR = 65-139 CC). 2 patients (18%) experienced post-operative complications. Both of these patients required re-intervention. This cohort of patients did not experience any mortality at 30 days related to pertinent complications or adverse MACE events. All patients were transferred to the PACU and ultimately discharged home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extending TAVR eligibility to high-risk patients with hostile aortic pathology through the implementation of simultaneous endovascular aortic repair, performed via the same access site, is an effective strategy for management of symptomatic aortic stenosis in the context of extensive cardiovascular co-morbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142407372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}