Vascular and endovascular surgery最新文献

Objective: Venous aneurysms are rare vascular abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. In this study, we presented our experience in managing thrombosed lower extremity venous aneurysms and evaluate the impact of vitamin D deficiency and genetic thrombophilic risk factors on patient management and outcomes.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational analysis was conducted on ten patients with thrombosed lower limb venous aneurysms who underwent surgical procedures at our hospital from July 2014 to February 2023. Collected data included venous duplex ultrasonographic imaging and laboratory tests including genetic thrombophilic risk factors and assessments of vitamin D levels.

Results: There were 5 males and 5 females. The mean age was 46.6 ± 12.1 years. The aneurysms were located in the popliteal vein in three patients, the great saphenous vein in six, and the small saphenous vein in one. Venous duplex imaging revealed saccular aneurysms in eight patients and fusiform aneurysms in two, with a mean diameter of 37.2 ± 10.6 mm, ranging from 23 to 52 mm. Laboratory tests indicated vitamin D deficiency in all of the patients, and genetic thrombophilic risk factors were identified in two cases. Surgical interventions consisted of tangential excision with lateral venorrhaphy in three patients and total excision and ligation in seven patients. The postoperative period was favorable for all patients.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment of thrombosed venous aneurysms in the lower extremities is essential to prevent complications such as thromboembolism. A comprehensive approach, including knowledge of genetic risk factors and vitamin D levels, may improve patient outcomes.

Background: Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) in elective settings has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes. However, life-threatening conditions such as rupture are more often managed with open surgical repair due to the high complexity of arch endovascular repair, lack of available off-the-shelf devices, and limited long-term data.

Case summary: A 49-year-old female with a recent history of prior ascending aortic repair for Type A₁₀ aortic dissection presented with chest pain and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed acute bilateral pulmonary emboli and a 6.2 cm post dissection aneurysm of the posterior aortic arch with the dissection extending to the right iliac artery. She was treated with thrombolysis and subsequently became hemodynamically unstable. Repeat CTA revealed a massive left hemithorax with concern for aortic arch rupture. Given significant cardiorespiratory compromise and recent open repair, she was considered unfit for redo open repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a physician-modified endograft (PMEG) was planned. An Alpha Zenith endograft was modified adding an internal branch for the innominate artery and a fenestration for the left common carotid artery. The left subclavian artery was occluded with a microvascular plug and coil embolization up to the level of the vertebral artery. TEVAR PMEG extension to the celiac artery was performed followed by deployment of a Zenith dissection stent to the aortic bifurcation. Completion angiogram demonstrated successful aneurysm exclusion and patency of target vessels.

Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of ruptured TAA with PMEGs is feasible. This approach may be an alternative for unfit patients for open repair in emergent settings.

Objective: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) growth remains a process not fully understood. The objective of this study was to analyze risk factors associated with changes in AAA diameter in a Mexican cohort.

Methods: An observational study in which we analyzed the entirely of patients in which an AAA was reported in a Computed Tomography (CT) study from 2014 to 2021 who had a follow-up CT. We divided them by groups depending on the diagnosis of type 2 diabetic mellitus and pharmacological history (diabetic vs non-diabetic, metformin vs non-metformin intake and statin vs non-statin intake). We compared pre and post follow-up AAA diameters using paired t-tests. A multivariate analysis was performed in order to identify independent variables associated with an increased growth rate. Statistical analysis was performed on Stata 17.

Results: During the studied period 72 (39.77%) patients had a follow-up CT. Mean age was 75 years (±9.05) and 52 (72.22%) were men. When comparing infra-renal largest diameter through time based on metformin intake, a significant difference was found only in the metformin non-intake group (42.05 ± 12.54 vs45.34 ± 12.06 [P = 0.02]), in contrast the metformin intake group measures were non-significantly different (36.13 ± 7.04 vs 37.00 ± 4.51; P = 0.57) through follow-up. In the multivariate analysis AAA largest diameter at diagnosis correlated with significantly increased growth rate (coeff = 0.06, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: AAA diameters appear to change through time in a non-linear pattern influenced by different epidemiological and clinical factors. Metformin intake appears to promote a stability in AAA diameter growth in our studied population.

Background: Selecting intervention strategies for renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) is challenging especially for those located at the vessel bifurcation. The relationship between the aneurysm and renal branches could not always be accurately viewed from traditional computed tomography angiography (CTA) images.

Case presentation: This study proposed a new method to investigate the anatomy and affected vessel branches of RAAs using automated software. Two patients with RAAs located at the renal artery bifurcation underwent Cone beam CTA (CBCTA) analysis. We sequentially coupled the "two-click AVA" function of Vessel IQ Xpress (GE Healthcare) with the "vascular tree extraction" function from FlightPlan for Embolization (GE Healthcare) to evaluate the relationship among the main renal artery, vessel branches, and aneurysms. The results showed that one patient had 1 out of 3 branches affected by the aneurysm, whereas the other's branches were all affected. Endovascular repair and open surgery were performed respectively based on the image analysis. Both patients recovered well at follow-up examination.

Conclusions: Based on CBCTA analysis, the combination use of the "two-click AVA" function of VesselIQ Xpress and FlightPlan for Embolization software could assist in aneurysm assessment and intervention choices for RAAs.

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a preoperative risk stratification tool providing an objective measure of fitness and functional capacity. There is however little evidence on the use of this compared to non-physiological test in vascular surgery despite its current use. This study investigates whether CPET perioperatively has value alongside non-physiological testing for patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

Method: Retrospective data was collected at 2 vascular centres between 2015-2019 in a CPET centre vs non-CPET centre in patients undergoing elective AAA repair. Outcomes measured included: length of stay in an intensive care unit (ICU); total length of stay; post-operative complications and acute kidney injury (AKI). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software.

Results: There were 38 patients at each centre. The mean duration of stay in ICU for patients in CPET centre was 2.5 ± 2.13 days whilst in non-CPET centre it was 3.68 ± 4.08 days (P = 0.05). The mean duration of stay in ICU and total length of stay was significantly shorter in CPET centre (P = 0.05 and P = 0.015 respectively). Mortality in CPET centre was 2.63% and 5.26% in non-CPET centre (not significant). The number of patients developing AKI post-operatively was 13.61% in CPET vs 28.95% in non-CPET centre.

Conclusion: CPET tested patients have statistically significant lower length of total and ICU stay compared to non-CPET patients. CPET is therefore a useful adjunct in selecting patients for open surgery compared to non-physiological testing. This study provides some evidence on the use of this routinely but not validated assessment tool in aortic aneurysm repair.

Objective: The aim of this study was to report the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients treated for IAAD with and without abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single academic institution in South America.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients with IAAD with or without concomitant AAA between January 2002 and December 2023 from a single academic hospital was performed.

Results: Eighteen patients with IAAD were diagnosed of whom 13 (72.2%) were males. Median age was 63 years (range: 43-88 years). Sixteen (88.8%) patients presented with symptoms, and in two (11.1%) asymptomatic patients IAAD was an incidental finding. Ten (55.5%) patients had concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), with a median size of the aneurysm of 49.5 mm (range: 44-66 mm). No statistical differences in baseline characteristics were seen between patients with concomitant IAAD and AAA and patients with only IAAD. Seven (38.8%) patients presented chronic dissection, and 11 (61.1%) patients had acute dissection. Five (27.7%) patients were treated conservatively with blood pressure, pain control, and antiplatelets; endovascular surgery was performed in eight (44.4%) patients and open surgery in five (27.7%) patients. The complication rate was 22.2% (n = 4), and the mortality rate was 0%. Median follow-up was 36 months (range: 6-240 months). Complete remodeling was seen in all patients except two patients who underwent conservative treatment. Of those, one had partial remodeling, and the other no changed.

Conclusion: Isolated aortic dissection of the abdominal aorta is an uncommon condition, with acceptable different treatment strategies, from conservative to invasive treatments. Sometimes IAAD can concur with AAA, and when so, invasive treatment might be considered. More studies describing the natural history of AAA and its association with IAAD are warranted, as well as further research reporting long-term outcomes on aortic remodeling after different treatment modalities.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been identified as an independent predictor of poorer long-term prognosis after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, its impact on short-term perioperative outcomes is conflicting, which can be important for preoperative risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day outcomes of patients with CKD following non-ruptured complex EVAR in a national registry.

Methods: Patients who had EVAR for complex AAA were identified in ACS-NSQIP targeted database from 2012-2022. Complex AAA included juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal proximal extent, Type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, and/or aneurysms treated with Zenith Fenestrated endograft. Exclusion criteria included age<18 years, ruptured AAA, acute intraoperative conversion to open, emergency presentation, and dialysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of CKD and non-CKD patients, where demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, anesthesia, and concomitant procedures were adjusted.

Results: There were 695 (39.33%) and 1072 (60.67%) patients with and without CKD, respectively, who underwent EVAR for complex AAA. Patients with and without CKD have comparable 30-day mortality (aOR = 1.165, 95 CI = 0.646-2.099, P = 0.61). However, CKD patients had a higher risk of renal complications (aOR = 2.647, 95 CI = 1.399-5.009, P < 0.01) including higher progressive renal insufficiency (aOR = 3.707, 95 CI = 1.329-10.338, P = 0.01) and acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (aOR = 2.533, 95 CI = 1.139-5.633, P = 0.02). All other 30-day outcomes were comparable between CKD and non-CKD patients.

Conclusion: Patients with CKD had similar 30-day mortality and morbidity rates but a higher risk of postoperative renal complications. Therefore, meticulous preoperative planning and postoperative management, which may include optimal hydration, appropriate contrast use, and close renal function monitoring, are essential for patients with CKD after complex EVAR.

Background: The National Health care Quality and Disparities Report (NHDQR) presents trends for measures related to access to care, affordable care, care coordination, effective treatment, healthy living, patient safety, and person-centered care. This study aims to determine the significance of insurance quality and access to care on AAA repair outcomes.

Methods: Data was obtained through the Agency for Health care Research and Quality database from 2016-2020. AAA repair mortality rates per 1000 persons, insurance quality, and structural access were compared between the 31 reportable U.S. states in which data was analyzed using linear regression models and ANOVA. Insurance quality and structural access groups were categorized as weak, average, and strong, based on NHDQR Reports measures.

Results: No association was found between access to care and AAA mortality at specific time points (2016 and 2020; P-value = .90 and .29 respectively) and when comparing states that showed improvement from 2016 to 2020 (weak categorization to strong; P value = .27). An association was found between private insurance quality and AAA repair mortality at baseline (2016; P-value = .022) and in those that showed improvement or worsening in private insurance quality over the study period (P-value = .042).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is no association between structural access quality and AAA mortality although an association exists between AAA mortality and private insurance quality.

Methods: Monocusp valve was created by folding the vein wall flap so that both sides of the valve will have intimal surface.

Result: Patient had excellent symptomatic improvement. The venous ulcer healed with skin grafting and had not recurred at 30 months follow up. Descending venogram and duplex scan showed mild reflux.

Conclusion: Monocusp neo valve creation for primary DVI is a simple procedure with good long-term result.

Background: Common iliac artery aneurysms are uncommon, with an estimated incidence of less than 0.01% in adults and accounting for only 1% of all intra-abdominal aneurysms. While the risk of rupture is approximately 5%, it increases significantly to 29% once the aneurysm reaches 4 cm. Similarly to abdominal aortic aneurysms, common iliac artery aneurysms often develop silently, remaining asymptomatic in about 70% of cases. This report describes the treatment of a patient with a kidney transplant who underwent endovascular repair of a ruptured left common iliac artery aneurysm with a concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and a focal aneurysm of the right renal artery origin. Case Description: A 78-year-old male patient with a kidney transplant presented with left sciatica symptoms and was found to have a contained rupture of a 10 x 7 cm left common iliac artery aneurysm with a concomitant 8 cm abdominal aortic aneurysm and a focal 1.8 cm aneurysm of the right renal artery origin. He underwent an endovascular aneurysm repair with an Aorto-Uni-iliac stent graft and a concomitant right-to-left femoral-femoral bypass using 8 mm ringed PTFE graft and ligation of left external iliac artery to prevent retrograde flow into the left common iliac artery aneurysm. At 3-year follow-up, patient remains stable with a functioning kidney transplant and excluded aneurysms with no evidence of endoleak. Conclusion: This report describes the endovascular repair of a ruptured left common iliac artery aneurysm conducted under local anesthesia in a patient with a renal transplant and complex aneurysm anatomy. The calcification pattern observed on a non-contrast CT scan was effectively used for surgical planning, leading to a successful aneurysm repair while preserving kidney transplant function.