首页 > 最新文献

Vascular and endovascular surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Bypass and Endovascular Revascularisation for Peripheral Artery Disease. 比较外周动脉疾病搭桥术和血管内再通术的随机对照试验的元分析》(Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Bypass and Endovascular Revascularisation for Peripheral Artery Disease)。
Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292123
Angus H Pegler, Shivshankar Thanigaimani, Siddharth S Pai, Dylan Morris, Jonathan Golledge

Objective: Peripheral artery disease affects approximately 250 million people globally. Multiple randomised controlled trials have compared bypass and endovascular interventions but the optimum revascularisation approach remains unclear. The recently published BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 trials provide current and robust data addressing this question, however their findings are not concordant. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an overview of the worldwide randomised evidence comparing bypass surgery and endovascular revascularisation in lower limb peripheral artery disease.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases was performed of all time periods up to 7 May 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing bypass and endovascular revascularisation for treating lower limb peripheral artery disease. The primary outcome was major amputation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, re-intervention, 30-day adverse events and 30-day mortality. Odds ratios were calculated and pooled using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool.

Results: Fourteen cohorts were identified across thirteen studies, enrolling 3840 patients. There was no significant difference in major amputation (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.57) or mortality (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.79-1.17) between the bypass and endovascular groups. Bypass was associated with a significant reduction in re-intervention compared with endovascular treatment (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that rates of major amputation and mortality are similar following bypass and endovascular interventions. Patients who undergo bypass surgery have a significantly lower re-intervention rate post-operatively.

目的:全球约有 2.5 亿人患有外周动脉疾病。多项随机对照试验对搭桥术和血管内介入术进行了比较,但最佳的血管再通方法仍不明确。最近发表的 BEST-CLI 和 BASIL-2 试验针对这一问题提供了最新的可靠数据,但它们的研究结果并不一致。本系统综述和荟萃分析概述了全球范围内比较下肢外周动脉疾病搭桥手术和血管内再通术的随机证据:在MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中对截至2023年5月7日的所有时间段进行了全面的文献检索,以确定比较搭桥手术和血管内再通术治疗下肢外周动脉疾病的随机对照试验。主要结果是大截肢。次要结果为死亡率、再次介入、30 天不良事件和 30 天死亡率。采用随机效应模型计算并汇总了风险比。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估偏倚风险:13项研究中确定了14个队列,共招募了3840名患者。搭桥组和血管内治疗组在大截肢率(OR 1.12;95% CI 0.80-1.57)或死亡率(OR 0.96;95% CI 0.79-1.17)方面无明显差异。与血管内治疗相比,搭桥治疗可显著减少再次介入治疗(OR 0.57,95% CI 0.40-0.82):这些研究结果表明,搭桥手术和血管内介入治疗的主要截肢率和死亡率相似。接受搭桥手术的患者术后再介入率明显较低。
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Bypass and Endovascular Revascularisation for Peripheral Artery Disease.","authors":"Angus H Pegler, Shivshankar Thanigaimani, Siddharth S Pai, Dylan Morris, Jonathan Golledge","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Peripheral artery disease affects approximately 250 million people globally. Multiple randomised controlled trials have compared bypass and endovascular interventions but the optimum revascularisation approach remains unclear. The recently published BEST-CLI and BASIL-2 trials provide current and robust data addressing this question, however their findings are not concordant. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an overview of the worldwide randomised evidence comparing bypass surgery and endovascular revascularisation in lower limb peripheral artery disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases was performed of all time periods up to 7 May 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing bypass and endovascular revascularisation for treating lower limb peripheral artery disease. The primary outcome was major amputation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, re-intervention, 30-day adverse events and 30-day mortality. Odds ratios were calculated and pooled using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen cohorts were identified across thirteen studies, enrolling 3840 patients. There was no significant difference in major amputation (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.57) or mortality (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.79-1.17) between the bypass and endovascular groups. Bypass was associated with a significant reduction in re-intervention compared with endovascular treatment (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that rates of major amputation and mortality are similar following bypass and endovascular interventions. Patients who undergo bypass surgery have a significantly lower re-intervention rate post-operatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142484815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does the Combined Arteritis Damage Score (CARDS) in the Diagnosis of Takayasu Arteritis Predict Prognosis and Need for Biologic Therapy? 诊断高安州动脉炎的联合动脉炎损伤评分(CARDS)能否预测预后和生物疗法的需求?
Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292104
Rabia Deniz, Tevfik Güzelbey, Merve Tanrıkulu, Cemal Bes

Background: We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the combined arteritis damage score (CARDS) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients to predict the need for biologic treatment at diagnosis and the possible contribution of wall thickness (WT).

Materials and methods: Blind evaluation of MRA/CTA at the time of diagnosis was performed by a reader rheumatologist (RR) and an interventional radiologist (RIR). The CARDS damage score for 21 arterial regions was assessed as normal, mild or moderate/severe stenosis, occclusion or aneursym/dilatation. Additionally, WT was scored for all regions as present or absent. A modified CARDS (mCARDS) was calculated as the sum of CARDS and the number of WT areas.

Results: According to follow-up treatment, 10 patients with non-biologic treatment (non-BT) (F/M:8/2, median age 37.5 years) and 15 patients with biologic treatment (BT) (F/M:13/2, median age 30 years) were included. Indian Takatasu Arteritis Score (ITAS), CRP, and ESR levels were similar in both groups. CARDS (1.4 (0-7.2) vs 4.5 (.6-19), P: .003), WT (1.5 (0-8) vs 7 (1-21), P < .001), and mCARDS (4 (0-14.2) vs 11.4 (1.6-40), P < .001) scores were significantly higher in the BT group compared to nonBT group. Cohen's kappa coefficient between RR and RIR for WT was .99 with 99.6% aggrement, and CARDS was .98 with 99.6% agreement. The AUC values for CARDS, WT, and mCARDS scores were .748 (.605-.892), .837 (.723-.950), and .847 (.735-.958), respectively, and P value was <.0001.

Conclusions: The prediction of prognosis and biologic treatment need at TAK diagnosis using non-invasive angiographic images can improve outcomes and prompt closer follow-up. The combination of CARDS and WT as mCARDS achieved the highest sensitivity and specificity, and all scores appear useful for predicting prognosis.

背景:我们旨在研究联合动脉炎损伤评分(CARDS)在高安动脉炎(TAK)患者中的预后价值,以预测诊断时是否需要生物治疗,以及管壁厚度(WT)可能造成的影响:由一名风湿病学家(RR)和一名介入放射学家(RIR)对诊断时的MRA/CTA进行盲法评估。21 个动脉区域的 CARDS 损伤评分被评估为正常、轻度或中度/重度狭窄、闭塞或动脉瘤/扩张。此外,还对所有区域的 WT 存在或不存在进行评分。改良CARDS(mCARDS)计算为CARDS与WT区域数量之和:根据随访治疗情况,纳入了 10 名接受非生物治疗(non-BT)的患者(女/男:8/2,中位年龄 37.5 岁)和 15 名接受生物治疗(BT)的患者(女/男:13/2,中位年龄 30 岁)。两组患者的印度高塔素动脉炎评分(ITAS)、CRP和ESR水平相似。与非 BT 组相比,BT 组的 CARDS(1.4 (0-7.2) vs 4.5 (.6-19), P: .003)、WT(1.5 (0-8) vs 7 (1-21), P < .001) 和 mCARDS(4 (0-14.2) vs 11.4 (1.6-40), P < .001)评分明显更高。WT RR 和 RIR 之间的科恩卡帕系数为 0.99,吻合率为 99.6%,CARDS 为 0.98,吻合率为 99.6%。CARDS、WT和mCARDS评分的AUC值分别为.748(.605-.892)、.837(.723-.950)和.847(.735-.958),P值为结论:在诊断 TAK 时使用非侵入性血管造影图像预测预后和生物治疗需求可改善预后并促使更密切的随访。CARDS和WT的组合作为mCARDS获得了最高的灵敏度和特异性,所有评分似乎都有助于预测预后。
{"title":"Does the Combined Arteritis Damage Score (CARDS) in the Diagnosis of Takayasu Arteritis Predict Prognosis and Need for Biologic Therapy?","authors":"Rabia Deniz, Tevfik Güzelbey, Merve Tanrıkulu, Cemal Bes","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the combined arteritis damage score (CARDS) in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients to predict the need for biologic treatment at diagnosis and the possible contribution of wall thickness (WT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Blind evaluation of MRA/CTA at the time of diagnosis was performed by a reader rheumatologist (RR) and an interventional radiologist (RIR). The CARDS damage score for 21 arterial regions was assessed as normal, mild or moderate/severe stenosis, occclusion or aneursym/dilatation. Additionally, WT was scored for all regions as present or absent. A modified CARDS (mCARDS) was calculated as the sum of CARDS and the number of WT areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to follow-up treatment, 10 patients with non-biologic treatment (non-BT) (F/M:8/2, median age 37.5 years) and 15 patients with biologic treatment (BT) (F/M:13/2, median age 30 years) were included. Indian Takatasu Arteritis Score (ITAS), CRP, and ESR levels were similar in both groups. CARDS (1.4 (0-7.2) vs 4.5 (.6-19), <i>P</i>: .003), WT (1.5 (0-8) vs 7 (1-21), <i>P</i> < .001), and mCARDS (4 (0-14.2) vs 11.4 (1.6-40), <i>P</i> < .001) scores were significantly higher in the BT group compared to nonBT group. Cohen's kappa coefficient between RR and RIR for WT was .99 with 99.6% aggrement, and CARDS was .98 with 99.6% agreement. The AUC values for CARDS, WT, and mCARDS scores were .748 (.605-.892), .837 (.723-.950), and .847 (.735-.958), respectively, and <i>P</i> value was <.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prediction of prognosis and biologic treatment need at TAK diagnosis using non-invasive angiographic images can improve outcomes and prompt closer follow-up. The combination of CARDS and WT as mCARDS achieved the highest sensitivity and specificity, and all scores appear useful for predicting prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rupture of an Aneurysmal Pulmonary Sequestration Artery. 动脉瘤性肺嵌塞动脉破裂。
Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241292114
Marjolijn Hordijk, Mathijs G Buimer

Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare lung malformation seldomly accompanied by aneurysmal deformation of its arterial vasculature. This is a first report of aneurysmal PS presenting with acute aneurysmal rupture. The ruptured aneurysm was treated uneventfully by emergency endovascular coiling, and thoracoscopic hemothorax drainage.

肺动脉畸形(PS)是一种罕见的肺部畸形,很少伴有动脉血管的动脉瘤样变形。这是首例动脉瘤性 PS 并发急性动脉瘤破裂的病例。破裂的动脉瘤通过急诊血管内旋转术和胸腔镜血胸引流术得到了顺利治疗。
{"title":"Rupture of an Aneurysmal Pulmonary Sequestration Artery.","authors":"Marjolijn Hordijk, Mathijs G Buimer","doi":"10.1177/15385744241292114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241292114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare lung malformation seldomly accompanied by aneurysmal deformation of its arterial vasculature. This is a first report of aneurysmal PS presenting with acute aneurysmal rupture. The ruptured aneurysm was treated uneventfully by emergency endovascular coiling, and thoracoscopic hemothorax drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complete Recovery After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type a Aortic Dissection With Cerebral Malperfusion: A Case Report. A 型主动脉夹层伴脑灌注的胸腔内血管主动脉修复术后完全康复:病例报告。
Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290414
Feifei Wang, Xiaojun Shu

A 52-year-old woman presented with chest pain, shortness of breath and loss of sensation in her left limbs. Computed tomography angiography revealed an type A aortic dissection involving the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery. Endovascular therapy successfully managed the condition by reconstructing the artery and occluding the false lumen.

一名 52 岁的女性因胸痛、气短和左侧肢体失去知觉而就诊。计算机断层扫描血管造影显示,主动脉夹层为 A 型,涉及肱脑干和右侧颈总动脉。血管内治疗通过重建动脉和闭塞假腔成功控制了病情。
{"title":"Complete Recovery After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type a Aortic Dissection With Cerebral Malperfusion: A Case Report.","authors":"Feifei Wang, Xiaojun Shu","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 52-year-old woman presented with chest pain, shortness of breath and loss of sensation in her left limbs. Computed tomography angiography revealed an type A aortic dissection involving the brachiocephalic trunk and right common carotid artery. Endovascular therapy successfully managed the condition by reconstructing the artery and occluding the false lumen.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142383152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Outcomes After Distal Bypass in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia due to Connective Tissue Disease. 结缔组织病导致的慢性肢体缺血患者远端搭桥术后的临床疗效。
Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290012
Taira Kobayashi, Masaki Hamamoto, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Hironori Shimoda, Misa Hasegawa, Shinya Takahashi

Objectives: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is mostly caused by arteriosclerosis, but is sometimes due to connective tissue disease. However, there is a limited knowledge of clinical outcomes of patients with CLTI with connective tissue disease. The objective of the study was to assess outcomes after distal bypass in these patients using global vascular guidelines.

Material and methods: Data from distal bypasses performed for CLTI at a single center from 2014 to 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical outcomes after distal bypass were compared for patients with CLTI with arteriosclerosis (AS group) and those with connective tissue disease (CD group). The primary endpoints were limb salvage and wound healing.

Results: Of the 282 distal bypasses performed for 222 patients with CLTI, 22 were conducted for 21 patients with connective tissue disease (CD group). The connective tissue disease was progressive systemic scleroderma (n = 11 patients), pemphigoid diseases (n = 2), polyarteritis nodosa (n = 2), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 2), and others (n = 4). Compared with the AS group, the CD group included more females (P = .007) and had greater oral steroid use (P < .001) and a higher Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (GLASS) inframalleolar (IM) modifier P2 (P < .001). The mean follow-up period of the whole cohort was 27 ± 22 months with no significant difference between the groups (P = .25), and 22 limbs required major amputation during this period. The 2-year limb salvage rate was significantly lower in the CD group compared to the AS group (75% vs 94%, P = .020). Wound healing was achieved in 220 (78%) limbs, and the 12-month wound healing rate was significantly lower in the CD group (52% vs 86%, P = .006).

Conclusion: The low 2-year limb salvage and 12-month wound healing rates in patients with CLTI with connective tissue disease indicate that distal bypass may be challenging in these patients.

目的:慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)主要由动脉硬化引起,但有时也由结缔组织病引起。然而,人们对患有结缔组织疾病的慢性肢体缺血患者的临床疗效了解有限。本研究的目的是根据全球血管指南评估这些患者远端搭桥术后的疗效:回顾性评估了2014年至2023年在一个中心为CLTI患者实施远端搭桥术的数据。比较了伴有动脉硬化的CLTI患者(AS组)和伴有结缔组织病的CLTI患者(CD组)的远端搭桥术后临床疗效。主要终点是肢体挽救和伤口愈合:结果:在为 222 名 CLTI 患者实施的 282 例远端搭桥术中,有 22 例是为 21 名结缔组织病患者(CD 组)实施的。结缔组织疾病包括进行性系统性硬皮病(11 例)、类天疱疮(2 例)、结节性多动脉炎(2 例)、类风湿性关节炎(2 例)及其他(4 例)。与强直性脊柱炎组相比,CD 组中女性较多(P = .007),口服类固醇药物较多(P < .001),全球肢体解剖分期系统(GLASS)小腿下(IM)修饰符 P2 较高(P < .001)。整个组群的平均随访时间为(27 ± 22)个月,两组间无显著差异(P = .25),在此期间有22条肢体需要大截肢。与 AS 组相比,CD 组的 2 年肢体挽救率明显较低(75% vs 94%,P = .020)。220个肢体(78%)的伤口愈合,CD组12个月的伤口愈合率明显低于AS组(52% vs 86%,P = .006):结论:伴有结缔组织疾病的CLTI患者的2年肢体挽救率和12个月伤口愈合率都很低,这表明对这些患者进行远端搭桥可能具有挑战性。
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes After Distal Bypass in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia due to Connective Tissue Disease.","authors":"Taira Kobayashi, Masaki Hamamoto, Takanobu Okazaki, Ryo Okusako, Hironori Shimoda, Misa Hasegawa, Shinya Takahashi","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is mostly caused by arteriosclerosis, but is sometimes due to connective tissue disease. However, there is a limited knowledge of clinical outcomes of patients with CLTI with connective tissue disease. The objective of the study was to assess outcomes after distal bypass in these patients using global vascular guidelines.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data from distal bypasses performed for CLTI at a single center from 2014 to 2023 were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical outcomes after distal bypass were compared for patients with CLTI with arteriosclerosis (AS group) and those with connective tissue disease (CD group). The primary endpoints were limb salvage and wound healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 282 distal bypasses performed for 222 patients with CLTI, 22 were conducted for 21 patients with connective tissue disease (CD group). The connective tissue disease was progressive systemic scleroderma (n = 11 patients), pemphigoid diseases (n = 2), polyarteritis nodosa (n = 2), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 2), and others (n = 4). Compared with the AS group, the CD group included more females (<i>P</i> = .007) and had greater oral steroid use (<i>P</i> < .001) and a higher Global Limb Anatomical Staging System (GLASS) inframalleolar (IM) modifier P2 (<i>P</i> < .001). The mean follow-up period of the whole cohort was 27 ± 22 months with no significant difference between the groups (<i>P</i> = .25), and 22 limbs required major amputation during this period. The 2-year limb salvage rate was significantly lower in the CD group compared to the AS group (75% vs 94%, <i>P</i> = .020). Wound healing was achieved in 220 (78%) limbs, and the 12-month wound healing rate was significantly lower in the CD group (52% vs 86%, <i>P</i> = .006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low 2-year limb salvage and 12-month wound healing rates in patients with CLTI with connective tissue disease indicate that distal bypass may be challenging in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Aspiration Thrombectomy and Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis for Management of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 吸栓术和超声加速溶栓术治疗肺栓塞的安全性和有效性比较:系统回顾与元分析》。
Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290009
Eshani J Choksi, Antony Sare, Pratik A Shukla, Abhishek Kumar

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) in pulmonary embolism (PE) management by performing a systematic review of the literature.

Materials and methods: The PubMed database was searched to identify articles on Inari's FlowTriever and Penumbra's Indigo mechanical thrombectomy devices (Group A) and the Ekos Endovascular system (Group B). Outcomes variables analyzed include pre- and post-procedure RV/LV ratio, pre- and post-procedure pulmonary artery pressure, hospital length of stay, technical success, specific complications, and mortality rate. Mean values were calculated using the weighted mean approach. RevMan Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the meta-analysis for this study. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) approach was used to perform a quality assessment of the included articles in order to verify the validity and reliability of the research.

Results: 27 studies were in Group A and 28 studies pertained to Group B. There were 1662 patients in Group A and 1273 patients in Group B. Both groups had similar technical success (99.6% vs 99.4%). Thrombectomy showed longer mean procedure time (73.03 ± 14.57 min vs 47.35 ± 3.15 min), lower mean blood loss (325.20 ± 69.15 mL vs 423.05 ± 64.95 mL), shorter mean ICU stay (2.35 ± 1.64 days vs 3.22 ± 1.27 days), and shorter mean overall hospital stay (6.94 ± 4.38 days vs 7.23 ± 2.31 days). EKOS showed greater mean change in Miller Index (9.05 ± 3.35 vs 4.91 ± 3.70) and greater mean change in pulmonary artery pressure (14.17 ± 6.35 mmHg vs 8.11 ± 4.39 mmHg).

Conclusion: Ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy are effective therapies for pulmonary embolism with comparable clinical outcomes.

目的:通过对文献进行系统回顾,比较机械血栓切除术(MT)和超声加速溶栓术(USAT)在肺栓塞(PE)治疗中的安全性和有效性:在PubMed数据库中搜索有关Inari的FlowTriever和Penumbra的Indigo机械血栓切除设备(A组)以及Ekos血管内系统(B组)的文章。分析的结果变量包括术前和术后 RV/LV 比值、术前和术后肺动脉压、住院时间、技术成功率、特定并发症和死亡率。平均值采用加权平均法计算。本研究采用 RevMan 5.4 版(Cochrane 协作组织)进行荟萃分析。结果:A组有27项研究,B组有28项研究,A组有1662名患者,B组有1273名患者。两组的技术成功率相似(99.6% vs 99.4%)。血栓切除术的平均手术时间更长(73.03±14.57 分钟 vs 47.35±3.15 分钟),平均失血量更低(325.20±69.15 毫升 vs 423.05±64.95 毫升),平均重症监护室住院时间更短(2.35±1.64 天 vs 3.22±1.27天),平均总住院时间更短(6.94±4.38 天 vs 7.23±2.31天)。EKOS显示米勒指数的平均变化更大(9.05 ± 3.35 vs 4.91 ± 3.70),肺动脉压力的平均变化更大(14.17 ± 6.35 mmHg vs 8.11 ± 4.39 mmHg):结论:超声加速溶栓和经皮机械取栓术是治疗肺栓塞的有效疗法,临床效果相当。
{"title":"Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Aspiration Thrombectomy and Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis for Management of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Eshani J Choksi, Antony Sare, Pratik A Shukla, Abhishek Kumar","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) in pulmonary embolism (PE) management by performing a systematic review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed database was searched to identify articles on Inari's FlowTriever and Penumbra's Indigo mechanical thrombectomy devices (Group A) and the Ekos Endovascular system (Group B). Outcomes variables analyzed include pre- and post-procedure RV/LV ratio, pre- and post-procedure pulmonary artery pressure, hospital length of stay, technical success, specific complications, and mortality rate. Mean values were calculated using the weighted mean approach. RevMan Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the meta-analysis for this study. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) approach was used to perform a quality assessment of the included articles in order to verify the validity and reliability of the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 studies were in Group A and 28 studies pertained to Group B. There were 1662 patients in Group A and 1273 patients in Group B. Both groups had similar technical success (99.6% vs 99.4%). Thrombectomy showed longer mean procedure time (73.03 ± 14.57 min vs 47.35 ± 3.15 min), lower mean blood loss (325.20 ± 69.15 mL vs 423.05 ± 64.95 mL), shorter mean ICU stay (2.35 ± 1.64 days vs 3.22 ± 1.27 days), and shorter mean overall hospital stay (6.94 ± 4.38 days vs 7.23 ± 2.31 days). EKOS showed greater mean change in Miller Index (9.05 ± 3.35 vs 4.91 ± 3.70) and greater mean change in pulmonary artery pressure (14.17 ± 6.35 mmHg vs 8.11 ± 4.39 mmHg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy are effective therapies for pulmonary embolism with comparable clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142376503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of Branched EVAR in Treatment of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm and Essential Accessory Renal Artery: Another Tool on the Shelf? A Case Report. 使用分支EVAR治疗并arenal主动脉瘤和重要肾动脉:货架上的另一种工具?病例报告。
Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290011
Donatas Opulskis, Imam T P Ritonga, Philipp Franke, Martin J Austermann, Marco Virgilio Usai

Objective: We present the case of a 58-year-old male patient referred to our department from a smaller facility for further evaluation and treatment strategy regarding the choice between open or endovascular surgery. The patient was diagnosed with a 6 cm asymptomatic juxtarenal aortic aneurysm and a 5 mm diameter accessory renal artery (ARA) supplying the lower half of left kidney. Further diagnostic assessments indicated that the left ARA was perfusing over 40% of the left kidney.

Methods: Given the patient's significant pre-existing medical conditions and elevated perioperative risk, the decision was made to proceed with minimally invasive endovascular surgery using a custom-made 5-branches stent graft (BEVAR).

Results: In the early postoperative period, the patient reported left flank pain. A subsequent CT scan identified a partial infarction in the left kidney due to the occlusion of an early small branch from the upper left renal artery. However, laboratory results showed no significant change in renal function compared to preoperative values. The patient was discharged 6 days post-surgery, with no additional complications observed during the early postoperative period.

Conclusion: This case report demonstrates that BEVAR is acceptable technique with satisfactory early postoperative outcomes for treating juxtarenal aortic aneurysms with an accessory renal artery in patients who are high-risk candidates for open repair and anatomically unsuitable for FEVAR or Ch-EVAR procedures.

目的:本病例是一名 58 岁的男性患者,从一家较小的医疗机构转诊至我科,就选择开放手术还是血管内手术进行进一步评估并制定治疗策略。患者被诊断出患有一个 6 厘米无症状的并肾主动脉瘤和一个直径为 5 毫米的供应左肾下半部的附属肾动脉(ARA)。进一步的诊断评估表明,左侧 ARA 供应了 40% 以上的左肾:考虑到患者原有的严重病症和围手术期的高风险,决定使用定制的 5 支支架移植物(BEVAR)进行微创血管内手术:术后早期,患者报告左侧腹部疼痛。随后的 CT 扫描发现,由于左肾上动脉的一条早期小分支闭塞,导致左肾部分梗死。然而,化验结果显示肾功能与术前相比没有明显变化。患者术后 6 天出院,术后早期未发现其他并发症:本病例报告表明,BEVAR 是一种可接受的技术,可用于治疗伴有附属肾动脉的并肾主动脉瘤,术后早期疗效令人满意,适用于开放式修复术的高风险候选者,以及在解剖上不适合 FEVAR 或 Ch-EVAR 手术的患者。
{"title":"Use of Branched EVAR in Treatment of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm and Essential Accessory Renal Artery: Another Tool on the Shelf? A Case Report.","authors":"Donatas Opulskis, Imam T P Ritonga, Philipp Franke, Martin J Austermann, Marco Virgilio Usai","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We present the case of a 58-year-old male patient referred to our department from a smaller facility for further evaluation and treatment strategy regarding the choice between open or endovascular surgery. The patient was diagnosed with a 6 cm asymptomatic juxtarenal aortic aneurysm and a 5 mm diameter accessory renal artery (ARA) supplying the lower half of left kidney. Further diagnostic assessments indicated that the left ARA was perfusing over 40% of the left kidney.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Given the patient's significant pre-existing medical conditions and elevated perioperative risk, the decision was made to proceed with minimally invasive endovascular surgery using a custom-made 5-branches stent graft (BEVAR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the early postoperative period, the patient reported left flank pain. A subsequent CT scan identified a partial infarction in the left kidney due to the occlusion of an early small branch from the upper left renal artery. However, laboratory results showed no significant change in renal function compared to preoperative values. The patient was discharged 6 days post-surgery, with no additional complications observed during the early postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case report demonstrates that BEVAR is acceptable technique with satisfactory early postoperative outcomes for treating juxtarenal aortic aneurysms with an accessory renal artery in patients who are high-risk candidates for open repair and anatomically unsuitable for FEVAR or Ch-EVAR procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Successful Percutaneous Rescue Treatment of Acute Carotid Stent Thrombosis Utilizing a Modified Embolic Protection Device. 利用改良栓塞保护装置成功经皮抢救治疗急性颈动脉支架血栓。
Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241290006
Alessandro Di Giorgio, Alessandro Mazzapicchi, Carla Rochira, Salvatore Azzarelli, Francesco Scardaci, Davide Salvatore Tomasello, Vincenzo Argentino, Francesco Amico

Acute Carotid Stent Thrombosis (ACST) is a rare complication of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) with a potentially fatal outcome. We report a case of ACST occurring five minutes after the end of a successful CAS procedure that was promptly treated by carotid stent-in-stent implantation using a new percutaneous strategy based on the creation of a modified embolic protection device. Following the procedure, we did not observe brain lesions suggestive of acute cerebral ischemic events at the CT scan performed at 48 hours, as well as no neurological deficits in the following days.

急性颈动脉支架血栓形成(ACST)是颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的一种罕见并发症,其结果可能是致命的。我们报告了一例在 CAS 手术成功结束五分钟后发生的 ACST 病例,该病例采用一种基于改良栓塞保护装置的新型经皮策略,通过颈动脉支架内支架植入术得到了及时治疗。手术后,我们在48小时的CT扫描中没有发现提示急性脑缺血事件的脑部病变,随后几天也没有发现神经功能障碍。
{"title":"Successful Percutaneous Rescue Treatment of Acute Carotid Stent Thrombosis Utilizing a Modified Embolic Protection Device.","authors":"Alessandro Di Giorgio, Alessandro Mazzapicchi, Carla Rochira, Salvatore Azzarelli, Francesco Scardaci, Davide Salvatore Tomasello, Vincenzo Argentino, Francesco Amico","doi":"10.1177/15385744241290006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241290006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute Carotid Stent Thrombosis (ACST) is a rare complication of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) with a potentially fatal outcome. We report a case of ACST occurring five minutes after the end of a successful CAS procedure that was promptly treated by carotid stent-in-stent implantation using a new percutaneous strategy based on the creation of a modified embolic protection device. Following the procedure, we did not observe brain lesions suggestive of acute cerebral ischemic events at the CT scan performed at 48 hours, as well as no neurological deficits in the following days.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intravascular Ultrasound May Not Impact Graft Sizing in Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury. 血管内超声可能不会影响钝性胸主动脉损伤血管内修复的移植物大小。
Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241264790
Alec Falkenhain, Nicholas Schaper, Tyler Arismendi, Matthew R Smeds, Saideep Bose

Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred treatment for severe blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). Successful outcomes rely on accurate endograft sizing, but initial imaging may underestimate aortic diameters. This study examines the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on endograft sizing and clinical outcomes in BTAI patients.

Methods: A prospectively collected multi-institutional dataset from the Aortic Trauma Foundation was analyzed. Patients with BTAI undergoing TEVAR with IVUS were compared to patients who underwent TEVAR alone. Demographics and operative variables were compared, focusing on IVUS effects on endograft sizing by examining maximal proximal and distal aortic diameter on initial CT imaging compared to the graft diameters used during TEVAR.

Results: 293 patients underwent TEVAR for BTAI with IVUS utilized in 124 cases (42.3%). The average graft size in the IVUS and non-IVUS groups were similar proximally (26.91 ± 4.3 mm IVUS vs 27.77 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.116) and distally (25.96 ± 4.7 mm IVUS vs 26.51 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS). IVUS did not impact the difference between graft size and initial CT measurements proximally (4.32 ± 4.8 mm IVUS vs 4.23 ± 3.9 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.859) or distally (4.17 ± 5.9 mm IVUS vs 4.50 ± 4.3 mm non-IVUS, P = 0.606). Although delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke occurred less frequently in IVUS patients (0.8% IVUS vs 7.1% non- IVUS, P = 0.024), in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (5.6% IVUS vs 7.7% non-IVUS, P = 0.581).

Conclusions: IVUS is not associated with significant changes in endograft sizing compared to sizing based on CT scan alone in BTAI patients. IVUS was not associated with differences in mortality but was associated with a decrease in delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Routine IVUS in BTAI patients may not be necessary for accurate sizing, but there may be a relationship between IVUS and stroke.

目的:胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)是治疗严重钝性胸主动脉损伤(BTAI)的首选方法。成功的疗效有赖于准确的内移植物尺寸,但初始成像可能会低估主动脉直径。本研究探讨了血管内超声(IVUS)对 BTAI 患者内移植物大小和临床预后的影响:方法:分析了主动脉创伤基金会收集的多机构前瞻性数据集。方法:对主动脉创伤基金会收集的多机构前瞻性数据集进行了分析,将接受TEVAR和IVUS的BTAI患者与单纯接受TEVAR的患者进行了比较。结果:293 名 BTAI 患者接受了 TEVAR,其中 124 例(42.3%)使用了 IVUS。IVUS组和非IVUS组近端(26.91 ± 4.3 mm IVUS vs 27.77 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS,P = 0.116)和远端(25.96 ± 4.7 mm IVUS vs 26.51 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS)的移植物平均尺寸相似。IVUS 对移植物近端(4.32 ± 4.8 mm IVUS vs 4.23 ± 3.9 mm non-IVUS,P = 0.859)或远端(4.17 ± 5.9 mm IVUS vs 4.50 ± 4.3 mm non-IVUS,P = 0.606)尺寸与 CT 初始测量值之间的差异没有影响。虽然IVUS患者发生延迟性出血性和缺血性卒中的频率较低(IVUS为0.8%,非IVUS为7.1%,P = 0.024),但两组患者的院内死亡率相似(IVUS为5.6%,非IVUS为7.7%,P = 0.581):IVUS与仅根据CT扫描确定的BTAI患者内移植物大小相比,并无明显变化。IVUS与死亡率的差异无关,但与延迟性出血性和缺血性卒中的减少有关。在 BTAI 患者中常规 IVUS 可能不是准确确定尺寸的必要条件,但 IVUS 与中风之间可能存在关系。
{"title":"Intravascular Ultrasound May Not Impact Graft Sizing in Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury.","authors":"Alec Falkenhain, Nicholas Schaper, Tyler Arismendi, Matthew R Smeds, Saideep Bose","doi":"10.1177/15385744241264790","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241264790","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the preferred treatment for severe blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). Successful outcomes rely on accurate endograft sizing, but initial imaging may underestimate aortic diameters. This study examines the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) on endograft sizing and clinical outcomes in BTAI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively collected multi-institutional dataset from the Aortic Trauma Foundation was analyzed. Patients with BTAI undergoing TEVAR with IVUS were compared to patients who underwent TEVAR alone. Demographics and operative variables were compared, focusing on IVUS effects on endograft sizing by examining maximal proximal and distal aortic diameter on initial CT imaging compared to the graft diameters used during TEVAR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>293 patients underwent TEVAR for BTAI with IVUS utilized in 124 cases (42.3%). The average graft size in the IVUS and non-IVUS groups were similar proximally (26.91 ± 4.3 mm IVUS vs 27.77 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS, <i>P</i> = 0.116) and distally (25.96 ± 4.7 mm IVUS vs 26.51 ± 4.7 mm non-IVUS). IVUS did not impact the difference between graft size and initial CT measurements proximally (4.32 ± 4.8 mm IVUS vs 4.23 ± 3.9 mm non-IVUS, <i>P</i> = 0.859) or distally (4.17 ± 5.9 mm IVUS vs 4.50 ± 4.3 mm non-IVUS, <i>P</i> = 0.606). Although delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke occurred less frequently in IVUS patients (0.8% IVUS vs 7.1% non- IVUS, <i>P</i> = 0.024), in-hospital mortality was similar between groups (5.6% IVUS vs 7.7% non-IVUS, <i>P</i> = 0.581).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IVUS is not associated with significant changes in endograft sizing compared to sizing based on CT scan alone in BTAI patients. IVUS was not associated with differences in mortality but was associated with a decrease in delayed hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Routine IVUS in BTAI patients may not be necessary for accurate sizing, but there may be a relationship between IVUS and stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlation Between Calcium Scoring and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair Outcomes. 钙化评分与腹主动脉瘤血管内修复结果的相关性
Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241263696
Houssam Farres, Santh Prakash Lanka, Sam Nussbaum, Mira Shoukry, Tareq Hanouneh, Lauren Alexander, David Sella, Tambi Jarmi

Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair, though minimally invasive and has the benefit of relatively low perioperative complication rates, it is associated with significant long term reintervention rates related to endoleaks. Several variables have been studied to predict the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair, 1 of which is the calcium burden of the vasculature. This prompted us to study the association between calcium burden measured by the standardized Agatston scoring system and the outcomes of Endovascular aneurysm repair.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent Endovascular aneurysm repair from 2008 to 2020 at our institution and who had a non-contrast computerized tomography scan preoperatively, accounting for 87 patients. The calcium burden of the vasculature was measured by the Agatston scoring system allowing for better reproducibility, and the outcome variables included mortality and endoleaks.

Results: Patients with higher median total calcium scores (≥12966.9) had significantly lesser survival (79.8% vs 52.3% (P = .002) at five years compared to patients with lower median total calcium score (<12966.9). Also, patients with type 2 endoleaks had higher calcium scores in above the aneurysm level ((1591.2 vs 688.2), P = .05)) compared to patients with no type 2 endoleaks.

Conclusion: Calcium score assigned using a standardized Agatston scoring system can be used as a predictor of mortality risk assisting in deciding the treatment of choice for patients.

目的:血管内动脉瘤修补术虽然是微创手术,而且围手术期并发症发生率相对较低,但与内漏相关的长期再介入率却很高。研究发现,有几个变量可以预测血管内动脉瘤修补术的结果,其中之一就是血管的钙负荷。这促使我们研究用标准化的阿加斯顿评分系统测量的钙负荷与血管内动脉瘤修补术结果之间的关联:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2008 年至 2020 年期间在我院接受血管内动脉瘤修补术的患者,术前进行了非对比度计算机断层扫描,共 87 例患者。血管的钙质负荷是通过Agatston评分系统进行测量的,该系统具有更好的可重复性,结果变量包括死亡率和内漏:结果:与无2型内膜渗漏的患者相比,中位总钙评分较高(≥12966.9)的患者五年后的生存率明显较低(79.8% vs 52.3% (P = .002)),而中位总钙评分较低的患者五年后的生存率较高(P = .05):结论:使用标准化的阿加斯顿评分系统得出的钙评分可作为死亡率风险的预测指标,有助于决定患者的治疗方案。
{"title":"Correlation Between Calcium Scoring and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair Outcomes.","authors":"Houssam Farres, Santh Prakash Lanka, Sam Nussbaum, Mira Shoukry, Tareq Hanouneh, Lauren Alexander, David Sella, Tambi Jarmi","doi":"10.1177/15385744241263696","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15385744241263696","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endovascular aneurysm repair, though minimally invasive and has the benefit of relatively low perioperative complication rates, it is associated with significant long term reintervention rates related to endoleaks. Several variables have been studied to predict the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair, 1 of which is the calcium burden of the vasculature. This prompted us to study the association between calcium burden measured by the standardized Agatston scoring system and the outcomes of Endovascular aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent Endovascular aneurysm repair from 2008 to 2020 at our institution and who had a non-contrast computerized tomography scan preoperatively, accounting for 87 patients. The calcium burden of the vasculature was measured by the Agatston scoring system allowing for better reproducibility, and the outcome variables included mortality and endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with higher median total calcium scores (≥12966.9) had significantly lesser survival (79.8% vs 52.3% (<i>P</i> = .002) at five years compared to patients with lower median total calcium score (<12966.9). Also, patients with type 2 endoleaks had higher calcium scores in above the aneurysm level ((1591.2 vs 688.2), <i>P</i> = .05)) compared to patients with no type 2 endoleaks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calcium score assigned using a standardized Agatston scoring system can be used as a predictor of mortality risk assisting in deciding the treatment of choice for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141422380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vascular and endovascular surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1