Alyssa Golden, Averil Griffith, Walter Demczuk, Gregory Tyrrell, Julianne Kus, Allison McGeer, Marc-Christian Domingo, Linda Hoang, Jessica Minion, Paul Van Caeseele, Hanan Smadi, David Haldane, George Zahariadis, Kristen Mead, Laura Steven, Lori Strudwick, Anita Li, Michael Mulvey, Irene Martin
Background: Invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) disease (caused by Streptococcus pyogenes) has been a nationally notifiable disease in Canada since 2000. This report summarizes the demographics, emm types and antimicrobial resistance of iGAS infections in Canada in 2020.
Methods: The Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) collaborates with provincial and territorial public health laboratories to conduct national surveillance of invasive S. pyogenes. Emm typing was performed on all isolates using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention emm sequencing protocol. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Population-based iGAS disease incidence rates up to 2019 were obtained through the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System.
Results: Overall, the incidence of iGAS disease in Canada has increased from 4.0 to 8.1 cases per 100,000 population from 2009 to 2019. The 2019 incidence represents a slight decrease from the 2018 rate of 8.6 cases per 100,000 population. A total of 2,867 invasive S. pyogenes isolates that were collected during 2020 are included in this report, representing a decrease from 2019 (n=3,194). The most common emm types in 2020 were emm49 (16.8%, n=483) and emm76 (15.0%, n=429), both increasing significantly in prevalence since 2016 (p<0.001). The former most prevalent type, emm1, decreased to 7.6% (n=217) in 2020 from 15.4% (n=325) in 2016. Antimicrobial resistance rates in 2020 included 11.5% resistance to erythromycin, 3.2% resistance to clindamycin and 1.6% nonsusceptibility to chloramphenicol.
Conclusion: Though the number of collected invasive S. pyogenes isolates decreased slightly in 2020 in comparison to previous years, iGAS disease remains an important public health concern. The emm distribution in Canada has been subtly shifting over the past five years, away from common and well-known emm1 and towards emm49 and emm76. It is important to continue surveillance of S. pyogenes in Canada to monitor expanding replacement emm types, as well as outbreak clones and antimicrobial resistance.
背景:自 2000 年以来,侵袭性 A 组链球菌(iGAS)疾病(由化脓性链球菌引起)一直是加拿大全国通报的疾病。本报告总结了 2020 年加拿大 iGAS 感染的人口统计学、emm 类型和抗菌药耐药性:方法:加拿大公共卫生局国家微生物实验室(马尼托巴省温尼伯市)与各省和地区公共卫生实验室合作,对入侵性化脓性链球菌进行全国监测。采用美国疾病控制与预防中心的 emm 测序方案对所有分离菌株进行了 Emm 分型。根据临床和实验室标准研究所的指南,采用柯比鲍尔磁盘扩散法测定抗菌药敏感性。通过加拿大应报疾病监测系统(Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System)获得了截至2019年的基于人群的iGAS疾病发病率:总体而言,从2009年到2019年,加拿大iGAS疾病的发病率从每10万人口4.0例上升到8.1例。2019年的发病率比2018年的每10万人口8.6例略有下降。本报告共收录了 2020 年收集的 2,867 例侵入性化脓性链球菌分离物,与 2019 年(n=3,194)相比有所下降。2020年最常见的emm类型是emm49(16.8%,n=483)和emm76(15.0%,n=429),这两种类型的流行率自2016年以来显著上升(pemm1从2016年的15.4%(n=325)下降到2020年的7.6%(n=217)。2020年的抗菌药耐药率包括11.5%的红霉素耐药率、3.2%的克林霉素耐药率和1.6%的氯霉素不耐药率:尽管与前几年相比,2020 年收集到的侵袭性化脓性链球菌分离物数量略有下降,但 iGAS 疾病仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题。在过去五年中,加拿大的emm分布发生了微妙的变化,从常见的、众所周知的emm1转向emm49和emm76。必须继续对加拿大的化脓性链球菌进行监控,以监测不断扩大的替代emm类型以及爆发的克隆和抗菌药耐药性。
{"title":"Invasive group A streptococcal disease surveillance in Canada, 2020.","authors":"Alyssa Golden, Averil Griffith, Walter Demczuk, Gregory Tyrrell, Julianne Kus, Allison McGeer, Marc-Christian Domingo, Linda Hoang, Jessica Minion, Paul Van Caeseele, Hanan Smadi, David Haldane, George Zahariadis, Kristen Mead, Laura Steven, Lori Strudwick, Anita Li, Michael Mulvey, Irene Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) disease (caused by <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>) has been a nationally notifiable disease in Canada since 2000. This report summarizes the demographics, <i>emm</i> types and antimicrobial resistance of iGAS infections in Canada in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) collaborates with provincial and territorial public health laboratories to conduct national surveillance of invasive <i>S. pyogenes. Emm</i> typing was performed on all isolates using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention <i>emm</i> sequencing protocol. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Population-based iGAS disease incidence rates up to 2019 were obtained through the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the incidence of iGAS disease in Canada has increased from 4.0 to 8.1 cases per 100,000 population from 2009 to 2019. The 2019 incidence represents a slight decrease from the 2018 rate of 8.6 cases per 100,000 population. A total of 2,867 invasive <i>S. pyogenes</i> isolates that were collected during 2020 are included in this report, representing a decrease from 2019 (n=3,194). The most common <i>emm</i> types in 2020 were <i>emm</i>49 (16.8%, n=483) and <i>emm</i>76 (15.0%, n=429), both increasing significantly in prevalence since 2016 (<i>p</i><0.001). The former most prevalent type, <i>emm</i>1, decreased to 7.6% (n=217) in 2020 from 15.4% (n=325) in 2016. Antimicrobial resistance rates in 2020 included 11.5% resistance to erythromycin, 3.2% resistance to clindamycin and 1.6% nonsusceptibility to chloramphenicol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though the number of collected invasive <i>S. pyogenes</i> isolates decreased slightly in 2020 in comparison to previous years, iGAS disease remains an important public health concern. The <i>emm</i> distribution in Canada has been subtly shifting over the past five years, away from common and well-known <i>emm</i>1 and towards <i>emm</i>49 and <i>emm</i>76. It is important to continue surveillance of <i>S. pyogenes</i> in Canada to monitor expanding replacement <i>emm</i> types, as well as outbreak clones and antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused substantial disruption to in-person learning, often interfering with the social and educational experience of children and youth across North America, and frequently impacting the greater community by limiting the ability of parents and caregivers to work outside the home. Real-world evidence related to the risk of COVID-19 transmission in school settings can help inform decisions around initiating, continuing, or suspending in-person learning.
Methods: We analyzed routinely collected case-based surveillance data from Saskatchewan's electronic integrated public health system, Panorama, from the 2020-2021 school year, spanning various phases of the pandemic (including the Alpha variant wave), to better understand the risk of in-school transmission of COVID-19 in Saskatchewan schools.
Results: The majority (over 80%) of school-associated COVID-19 infections were acquired outside the school setting. This finding suggests that the non-pharmaceutical measures in place (including masking, distancing, enhanced hygiene, and cohorting) worked to limit viral spread in schools.
Conclusion: Implementation of such control measures may play an essential role in allowing children and youth to safely maintain in-person learning during the pandemic.
{"title":"In-person learning low risk for COVID-19 acquisition: Findings from a population-based analysis of the 2020-2021 school year in Saskatchewan, Canada.","authors":"Molly Trecker, Leanne McLean, Stephanie Konrad, Dharma Yalamanchili, Kristi Langhorst, Maureen Anderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused substantial disruption to in-person learning, often interfering with the social and educational experience of children and youth across North America, and frequently impacting the greater community by limiting the ability of parents and caregivers to work outside the home. Real-world evidence related to the risk of COVID-19 transmission in school settings can help inform decisions around initiating, continuing, or suspending in-person learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed routinely collected case-based surveillance data from Saskatchewan's electronic integrated public health system, Panorama, from the 2020-2021 school year, spanning various phases of the pandemic (including the Alpha variant wave), to better understand the risk of in-school transmission of COVID-19 in Saskatchewan schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (over 80%) of school-associated COVID-19 infections were acquired outside the school setting. This finding suggests that the non-pharmaceutical measures in place (including masking, distancing, enhanced hygiene, and cohorting) worked to limit viral spread in schools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of such control measures may play an essential role in allowing children and youth to safely maintain in-person learning during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Recombinant protein technology is a novel platform for influenza vaccine manufacturing that differs significantly from existing egg-based and mammalian cell culture-based technologies. Supemtek™ is the first and, to date, the only recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) authorized for use in Canada in adults aged 18 years and older. The objective is to review the available evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of RIV4, and to summarize the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommendation regarding the use of Supemtek.
Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of RIV4 in adults was conducted according to methodology specified a priori in a written protocol. NACI evidence-based process was used to assess the available evidence and develop a recommendation regarding the use of Supemtek.
Results: Ten eligible studies were included in the evidence synthesis. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adults aged 50 years and older provided evidence that RIV4 may potentially offer improved protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza A infection compared to standard egg-based influenza vaccines. Data from eight RCTs assessing immunogenicity and five RCTs and one post-marketing surveillance study assessing safety indicated that Supemtek is a safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic alternative to conventional egg-based influenza vaccines for adults.
Conclusion: There is fair evidence that Supemtek is effective, safe, and has non-inferior immunogenicity to comparable vaccines, based on direct evidence in adults 18 years of age and older; thus, NACI recommends that Supemtek may be considered among the seasonal influenza vaccines offered to adults 18 years of age and older for their annual influenza vaccination.
{"title":"Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Supplemental Statement on Recombinant Influenza Vaccines.","authors":"Anabel Gil, Angela Sinilaite, Jesse Papenburg","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recombinant protein technology is a novel platform for influenza vaccine manufacturing that differs significantly from existing egg-based and mammalian cell culture-based technologies. Supemtek™ is the first and, to date, the only recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine (RIV4) authorized for use in Canada in adults aged 18 years and older. The objective is to review the available evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of RIV4, and to summarize the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommendation regarding the use of Supemtek.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of RIV4 in adults was conducted according to methodology specified <i>a priori</i> in a written protocol. NACI evidence-based process was used to assess the available evidence and develop a recommendation regarding the use of Supemtek.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten eligible studies were included in the evidence synthesis. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adults aged 50 years and older provided evidence that RIV4 may potentially offer improved protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza A infection compared to standard egg-based influenza vaccines. Data from eight RCTs assessing immunogenicity and five RCTs and one post-marketing surveillance study assessing safety indicated that Supemtek is a safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic alternative to conventional egg-based influenza vaccines for adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is fair evidence that Supemtek is effective, safe, and has non-inferior immunogenicity to comparable vaccines, based on direct evidence in adults 18 years of age and older; thus, NACI recommends that Supemtek may be considered among the seasonal influenza vaccines offered to adults 18 years of age and older for their annual influenza vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) reviews the evolving evidence on influenza immunization and provides annual recommendations regarding the use of authorized seasonal influenza vaccines to the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Objective: To summarize the NACI seasonal influenza vaccine recommendations for 2022-2023 and to highlight new recommendations and supporting evidence.
Methods: In the preparation of the Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2022-2023, NACI's Influenza Working Group followed the NACI evidence-based process for developing recommendations. The recommendations were then considered and approved by NACI in light of the available evidence.
Results: The following key updates and new recommendations have been made for the 2022-2023 season: 1) updated information/guidance on influenza vaccination in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been incorporated; 2) Supemtek™ recombinant influenza vaccine may be considered for use among the quadrivalent influenza vaccines offered to adults 18 years of age and older for annual influenza immunization; and 3) Flucelvax® Quad may be considered among the quadrivalent influenza vaccines offered to adults and children two years of age and older.
Conclusion: NACI continues to recommend that an age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be offered annually for all individuals aged six months of age and older who do not have contraindications to the vaccine, with particular focus on people at high risk of influenza-related complications or hospitalization, people capable of transmitting influenza to those at high risk, and other groups for whom influenza vaccination is particularly recommended.
{"title":"Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Statement for 2022-2023.","authors":"Angela Sinilaite, Jesse Papenburg","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) reviews the evolving evidence on influenza immunization and provides annual recommendations regarding the use of authorized seasonal influenza vaccines to the Public Health Agency of Canada.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the NACI seasonal influenza vaccine recommendations for 2022-2023 and to highlight new recommendations and supporting evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the preparation of the Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2022-2023, NACI's Influenza Working Group followed the NACI evidence-based process for developing recommendations. The recommendations were then considered and approved by NACI in light of the available evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following key updates and new recommendations have been made for the 2022-2023 season: 1) updated information/guidance on influenza vaccination in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been incorporated; 2) Supemtek™ recombinant influenza vaccine may be considered for use among the quadrivalent influenza vaccines offered to adults 18 years of age and older for annual influenza immunization; and 3) Flucelvax<sup>®</sup> Quad may be considered among the quadrivalent influenza vaccines offered to adults and children two years of age and older.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NACI continues to recommend that an age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be offered annually for all individuals aged six months of age and older who do not have contraindications to the vaccine, with particular focus on people at high risk of influenza-related complications or hospitalization, people capable of transmitting influenza to those at high risk, and other groups for whom influenza vaccination is particularly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Laboratory confirmation of influenza is not routinely done in practice. With the advent of big data, it is tempting to use healthcare administrative databases for influenza vaccine effectiveness studies, which often rely on clinical diagnosis codes. The objective of this article is to compare influenza incidence curves using international case definitions derived from clinical diagnostic codes with influenza surveillance data from the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Methods: This case series describes influenza incidence by CDC week, defined using International Classification of Disease diagnostic codes over four influenza seasons (2015-2016 to 2018-2019) in a cohort of US individuals three years of age and older who consulted at least once per year between 2015 and 2019. Results were compared to the number of influenza-positive specimens or outpatient visits for influenza-like illness obtained from the CDC flu surveillance data.
Results: The incidence curves of influenza-related medical encounters were very similar to the CDC's surveillance data for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Conversely, the number of influenza-like illness encounters was high when influenza viruses started to circulate, leading to a discrepancy with CDC-reported data.
Conclusion: A specific case definition should be prioritized when data for laboratory-confirmed influenza are not available, as a broader case definition would conservatively bias influenza vaccine effectiveness toward the null.
{"title":"Evaluation of influenza case definitions for use in real-world evidence research.","authors":"Pamela Doyon-Plourde, Élise Fortin, Caroline Quach","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory confirmation of influenza is not routinely done in practice. With the advent of big data, it is tempting to use healthcare administrative databases for influenza vaccine effectiveness studies, which often rely on clinical diagnosis codes. The objective of this article is to compare influenza incidence curves using international case definitions derived from clinical diagnostic codes with influenza surveillance data from the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series describes influenza incidence by CDC week, defined using International Classification of Disease diagnostic codes over four influenza seasons (2015-2016 to 2018-2019) in a cohort of US individuals three years of age and older who consulted at least once per year between 2015 and 2019. Results were compared to the number of influenza-positive specimens or outpatient visits for influenza-like illness obtained from the CDC flu surveillance data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence curves of influenza-related medical encounters were very similar to the CDC's surveillance data for laboratory-confirmed influenza. Conversely, the number of influenza-like illness encounters was high when influenza viruses started to circulate, leading to a discrepancy with CDC-reported data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A specific case definition should be prioritized when data for laboratory-confirmed influenza are not available, as a broader case definition would conservatively bias influenza vaccine effectiveness toward the null.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723760/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alyssa Golden, Averil Griffith, Walter Demczuk, Brigitte Lefebvre, Allison McGeer, Gregory Tyrrell, George Zhanel, Julianne Kus, Linda Hoang, Jessica Minion, Paul Van Caeseele, Hanan Smadi, David Haldane, George Zahariadis, Kristen Mead, Laura Steven, Lori Strudwick, Anita Li, Michael Mulvey, Irene Martin
Background: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), which is caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, has been a nationally notifiable disease in Canada since 2000. The use of conjugate vaccines has markedly decreased the incidence of IPD in Canada; however, the distribution of serotypes has shifted in favour of non-vaccine types. This report summarizes the demographics, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of IPD infections in Canada in 2020.
Methods: The Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) collaborates with provincial and territorial public health laboratories to conduct national surveillance of IPD. A total of 2,108 IPD isolates were reported in 2020. Serotyping was performed by Quellung reaction and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined in collaboration with the University of Manitoba/Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance. Population-based IPD incidence rates were obtained through the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System.
Results: Overall incidence of IPD in Canada decreased significantly from 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.1-13.1) to 6.0 (95% CI: 5.0-7.2), and from 10.0 (95% CI: 9.7-10.3) to 5.9 (95% CI: 5.7-6.2) cases per 100,000 from 2019 to 2020; in those younger than five years and those five years and older, respectively. The most common serotypes overall were 4 (11.2%, n=237), 3 (10.9%, n=229) and 8 (7.2%, n=151). From 2016 to 2020, serotypes with increasing trends (p<0.05) included 4 (6.4%-11.2%), 3 (9.5%-10.9%), 8 (5.2%-7.2%) and 12F (3.6%-5.7%). The overall prevalence of PCV13 serotypes increased over the same period (30.3%-34.9%, p<0.05). Antimicrobial resistance rates in 2020 included 23.0% clarithromycin and 9.9% penicillin (IV meningitis breakpoints). Multidrug-resistant IPD has significantly increased since 2016 (4.2%-9.5%, p<0.05).
Conclusion: Though the incidence of IPD decreased in 2020 in comparison to previous years across all age groups, disease due to PCV13 serotypes 3 and 4, as well as non-PCV13 serotypes such as 8 and 12F, increased in prevalence. Continued surveillance of IPD is imperative to monitor shifts in serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance.
{"title":"Invasive pneumococcal disease surveillance in Canada, 2020.","authors":"Alyssa Golden, Averil Griffith, Walter Demczuk, Brigitte Lefebvre, Allison McGeer, Gregory Tyrrell, George Zhanel, Julianne Kus, Linda Hoang, Jessica Minion, Paul Van Caeseele, Hanan Smadi, David Haldane, George Zahariadis, Kristen Mead, Laura Steven, Lori Strudwick, Anita Li, Michael Mulvey, Irene Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), which is caused by <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>, has been a nationally notifiable disease in Canada since 2000. The use of conjugate vaccines has markedly decreased the incidence of IPD in Canada; however, the distribution of serotypes has shifted in favour of non-vaccine types. This report summarizes the demographics, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of IPD infections in Canada in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) collaborates with provincial and territorial public health laboratories to conduct national surveillance of IPD. A total of 2,108 IPD isolates were reported in 2020. Serotyping was performed by Quellung reaction and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined in collaboration with the University of Manitoba/Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance. Population-based IPD incidence rates were obtained through the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall incidence of IPD in Canada decreased significantly from 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.1-13.1) to 6.0 (95% CI: 5.0-7.2), and from 10.0 (95% CI: 9.7-10.3) to 5.9 (95% CI: 5.7-6.2) cases per 100,000 from 2019 to 2020; in those younger than five years and those five years and older, respectively. The most common serotypes overall were 4 (11.2%, n=237), 3 (10.9%, n=229) and 8 (7.2%, n=151). From 2016 to 2020, serotypes with increasing trends (<i>p</i><0.05) included 4 (6.4%-11.2%), 3 (9.5%-10.9%), 8 (5.2%-7.2%) and 12F (3.6%-5.7%). The overall prevalence of PCV13 serotypes increased over the same period (30.3%-34.9%, <i>p</i><0.05). Antimicrobial resistance rates in 2020 included 23.0% clarithromycin and 9.9% penicillin (IV meningitis breakpoints). Multidrug-resistant IPD has significantly increased since 2016 (4.2%-9.5%, <i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Though the incidence of IPD decreased in 2020 in comparison to previous years across all age groups, disease due to PCV13 serotypes 3 and 4, as well as non-PCV13 serotypes such as 8 and 12F, increased in prevalence. Continued surveillance of IPD is imperative to monitor shifts in serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10732480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138833860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D. Todoric, L. Vrbova, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, S. Gasmi, Angelica Stewart, Sandra Connors, Hui Zheng, A. Bourgeois, M. Drebot, J. Paré, Marnie Zimmer, P. Buck
National West Nile virus (WNV) surveillance was established in partnership with the federal, provincial and territorial governments starting in 2000, with the aim to monitor the emergence and subsequent spread of WNV disease in Canada. As the disease emerged, national WNV surveillance continued to focus on early detection of WNV disease outbreaks in different parts of the country. In Canada, the WNV transmission season occurs from May to November. During the season, the system adopts a One Health approach to collect, integrate, analyze and disseminate national surveillance data on human, mosquito, bird and other animal cases. Weekly and annual reports are available to the public, provincial/territorial health authorities, and other federal partners to provide an ongoing national overview of WNV infections in Canada. While national surveillance allows a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction comparison of data, it also helps to guide appropriate disease prevention strategies such as education and awareness campaigns at the national level. This paper aims to describe both the establishment and the current structure of national WNV surveillance in Canada.
{"title":"An overview of the National West Nile Virus Surveillance System in Canada: A One Health approach.","authors":"D. Todoric, L. Vrbova, Maria Elizabeth Mitri, S. Gasmi, Angelica Stewart, Sandra Connors, Hui Zheng, A. Bourgeois, M. Drebot, J. Paré, Marnie Zimmer, P. Buck","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v48i05a01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i05a01","url":null,"abstract":"National West Nile virus (WNV) surveillance was established in partnership with the federal, provincial and territorial governments starting in 2000, with the aim to monitor the emergence and subsequent spread of WNV disease in Canada. As the disease emerged, national WNV surveillance continued to focus on early detection of WNV disease outbreaks in different parts of the country. In Canada, the WNV transmission season occurs from May to November. During the season, the system adopts a One Health approach to collect, integrate, analyze and disseminate national surveillance data on human, mosquito, bird and other animal cases. Weekly and annual reports are available to the public, provincial/territorial health authorities, and other federal partners to provide an ongoing national overview of WNV infections in Canada. While national surveillance allows a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction comparison of data, it also helps to guide appropriate disease prevention strategies such as education and awareness campaigns at the national level. This paper aims to describe both the establishment and the current structure of national WNV surveillance in Canada.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81009284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. O’Brien, S. Drews, A. Lewin, C. Osiowy, M. Drebot, C. Renaud
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic galvanized blood donor seroprevalence studies, which continue to inform public health policy. We propose that the two Canadian blood suppliers, Héma-Québec and Canadian Blood Services, expand their role in public health surveillance in the post-pandemic period. Together blood suppliers have near-national reach, collecting blood donations nearly every day in all larger cities and many smaller municipalities. Blood donors are a healthy subset of the general population. Demographic data, routine infectious disease testing and screening questionnaire data are collected for all donations. Close to one million blood samples per year could be made available for surveillance. With 90% repeat donors, longitudinal sampling is possible. Current blood donor surveillance includes monitoring infectious marker rates in low risk (e.g. HIV, hepatitis C virus) or asymptomatic (e.g. West Nile virus) populations, and ad hoc studies to monitor transfusion-transmissible infections. These include tick-borne infections such as Babesia microti and foodborne infections such as hepatitis E. Canadian Blood Services and Héma-Québec are actively seeking to engage with public health professionals to further develop a role in public health surveillance.
{"title":"Canadian blood suppliers: An expanding role in public health surveillance?","authors":"S. O’Brien, S. Drews, A. Lewin, C. Osiowy, M. Drebot, C. Renaud","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a02","url":null,"abstract":"The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic galvanized blood donor seroprevalence studies, which continue to inform public health policy. We propose that the two Canadian blood suppliers, Héma-Québec and Canadian Blood Services, expand their role in public health surveillance in the post-pandemic period. Together blood suppliers have near-national reach, collecting blood donations nearly every day in all larger cities and many smaller municipalities. Blood donors are a healthy subset of the general population. Demographic data, routine infectious disease testing and screening questionnaire data are collected for all donations. Close to one million blood samples per year could be made available for surveillance. With 90% repeat donors, longitudinal sampling is possible. Current blood donor surveillance includes monitoring infectious marker rates in low risk (e.g. HIV, hepatitis C virus) or asymptomatic (e.g. West Nile virus) populations, and ad hoc studies to monitor transfusion-transmissible infections. These include tick-borne infections such as Babesia microti and foodborne infections such as hepatitis E. Canadian Blood Services and Héma-Québec are actively seeking to engage with public health professionals to further develop a role in public health surveillance.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75061342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. Ndubuka, Sabyasachi Gupta, Rim Zayed, Brian Quinn, M. Khaketla, Elaine Chan, Kristyn Franklin, Erin McGill
Background Sixty-eight laboratory-confirmed cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (12 in Alberta [AB], 56 in Saskatchewan [SK]) were linked to a gathering at a hospital in Alberta on June 1-4, 2020, and a wake/funeral in a First Nations community in northern Saskatchewan on June 9-11, 2020. Objective The objectives were to provide a comprehensive description of the epidemiology of the outbreak and describe the chains of transmission to inform the hypothesis that there were multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral. Methods Case investigation and contact tracing was conducted by local public health in AB and SK. The Public Health Agency of Canada conducted a centralized case analysis. An epidemic curve and a Gantt chart for period of communicability were created to support or refute whether there had been multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral. Results Illness onset dates ranged from May 31 to July 1, 2020. Ages ranged from 2 to 80 years (median age=43 years). Five cases were hospitalized; there were no deaths. The available case exposure information supports the hypothesis that there had been multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral. Public health authorities in AB and SK declared the outbreak over on July 20, 2020; based on two incubation periods (i.e. 28 days) following the illness onset of the last primary case. Conclusion During multijurisdictional outbreaks, data sharing, coordination across health authorities and centralized analysis is essential to understanding the events that lead to the outbreak and possible hypotheses around chains of transmission.
{"title":"Multijurisdictional outbreak of COVID-19 associated with a wake/funeral event in a northern Saskatchewan First Nations community.","authors":"N. Ndubuka, Sabyasachi Gupta, Rim Zayed, Brian Quinn, M. Khaketla, Elaine Chan, Kristyn Franklin, Erin McGill","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a04","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Sixty-eight laboratory-confirmed cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (12 in Alberta [AB], 56 in Saskatchewan [SK]) were linked to a gathering at a hospital in Alberta on June 1-4, 2020, and a wake/funeral in a First Nations community in northern Saskatchewan on June 9-11, 2020.\u0000\u0000\u0000Objective\u0000The objectives were to provide a comprehensive description of the epidemiology of the outbreak and describe the chains of transmission to inform the hypothesis that there were multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Case investigation and contact tracing was conducted by local public health in AB and SK. The Public Health Agency of Canada conducted a centralized case analysis. An epidemic curve and a Gantt chart for period of communicability were created to support or refute whether there had been multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Illness onset dates ranged from May 31 to July 1, 2020. Ages ranged from 2 to 80 years (median age=43 years). Five cases were hospitalized; there were no deaths. The available case exposure information supports the hypothesis that there had been multiple introductions of COVID-19 at the wake/funeral. Public health authorities in AB and SK declared the outbreak over on July 20, 2020; based on two incubation periods (i.e. 28 days) following the illness onset of the last primary case.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000During multijurisdictional outbreaks, data sharing, coordination across health authorities and centralized analysis is essential to understanding the events that lead to the outbreak and possible hypotheses around chains of transmission.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89124505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
É. Fortin, P. De Wals, D. Talbot, M. Ouakki, G. Deceuninck, C. Sauvageau, R. Gilca, Marilou Kiely, G. De Serres
Background Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and private residences for seniors (PRSs) were given priority for vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the shortage of vaccine in the winter of 2021, the Comité sur l'immunisation du Québec recommended postponing the administration of second doses to ensure more rapid and widespread administration of first doses. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of first-dose vaccination on 1) the incidence of cases and complications in LTCFs and PRSs and 2) the frequency of outbreaks in LTCFs. Methods In this ecological study, COVID-19 incidence and complications in residents of LTCFs and PRSs in Québec were compared with the general (community) population at a point in time when there was still only limited eligibility for vaccination. Results After vaccination in LTCFs, the incidence rate of COVID-19 decreased by 92% compared with 49% in the community, and deaths decreased by 95%. By six weeks post-vaccination, almost no facility reported five or more cases per 100 beds per week. The incidence rate decreased by 91% in PRSs compared with 2% in the community. Hospitalizations and deaths in PRSs decreased by 94% and 90%, respectively. Conclusion As a result of 1) vaccination of residents with one dose, 2) natural immunity already acquired in LTCFs and PRSs, 3) vaccination of healthcare workers and 4) other non-pharmaceutical prevention measures implemented, the circulation of the coronavirus in these settings was largely interrupted.
{"title":"Impact of the first vaccine dose on COVID-19 and its complications in long-term care facilities and private residences for seniors in Québec, Canada.","authors":"É. Fortin, P. De Wals, D. Talbot, M. Ouakki, G. Deceuninck, C. Sauvageau, R. Gilca, Marilou Kiely, G. De Serres","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i04a07","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and private residences for seniors (PRSs) were given priority for vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the shortage of vaccine in the winter of 2021, the Comité sur l'immunisation du Québec recommended postponing the administration of second doses to ensure more rapid and widespread administration of first doses. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of first-dose vaccination on 1) the incidence of cases and complications in LTCFs and PRSs and 2) the frequency of outbreaks in LTCFs.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000In this ecological study, COVID-19 incidence and complications in residents of LTCFs and PRSs in Québec were compared with the general (community) population at a point in time when there was still only limited eligibility for vaccination.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000After vaccination in LTCFs, the incidence rate of COVID-19 decreased by 92% compared with 49% in the community, and deaths decreased by 95%. By six weeks post-vaccination, almost no facility reported five or more cases per 100 beds per week. The incidence rate decreased by 91% in PRSs compared with 2% in the community. Hospitalizations and deaths in PRSs decreased by 94% and 90%, respectively.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000As a result of 1) vaccination of residents with one dose, 2) natural immunity already acquired in LTCFs and PRSs, 3) vaccination of healthcare workers and 4) other non-pharmaceutical prevention measures implemented, the circulation of the coronavirus in these settings was largely interrupted.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89490852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}