Cancer Causes & Control最新文献

NEED: Cervical cancer is a major global public health issue, particularly affecting low and middle-income countries, distinctly in the South Asian region. This geographical region lacks a well-organized routine cervical screening program. Consequently, this scoping review aimed to investigate the evidence on factors influencing the adoption and implementation of routine cervical cancer screening in South Asia.

Methods: Adopting the "Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al." methodology, databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus were scrutinized in the pursuit of relevant studies. Subsequently, the collected data were synthesized by adopting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) model.

Results: A total of 837 records were initially identified and screened for eligibility, including 55 studies. The successful adoption and implementation of cervical cancer screening in South Asia encounter numerous obstacles within the health system, including the absence of a comprehensive program protocol for screening, inadequate health infrastructure, and the presence of multiple sociocultural factors, such as social stigma, low levels of education, and concerns related to modesty.

Conclusion: To optimize adoption and implementation, it is imperative to construct a customized policy framework that incorporates a risk communication strategy tailored to the specific contexts of these nations. Drawing insights from the experiences of South Asian countries in executing cervical cancer screening programs can inform the formulation of policies for similar healthcare initiatives aimed at facilitating the expansion of HPV vaccination efforts.

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) is an increasing burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. This systematic review examined the incidence, prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PCa in Nigeria.

Methods: This review followed the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies that focused on epidemiology of PCa in Nigeria, published between 1990 and 2023 and written in English were eligible. Combination of keywords was used to search PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, AJOL and web of science databases. A piloted form by the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template was used to extract data from retrieved studies. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies.

Results: Of the 1898 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. All included studies showed good quality. Mean age for PCa ranged from 55 to 71 years, with a higher prevalence occurring within 60-69 years. A 7.7 fold increase in PCa incidence was reported for the years 1997-2006, while an average annual increase in incidence rate of 11.95% was observed from 2009 to 2013. Hospital-based prevalence of 14%-46.4% was observed for clinically active PCa. Patients presented for diagnosis with high Gleason scores and advanced PCa. High mortality (15.6%-64.0%) occurred between 6 months and 3 years of diagnosis.

Conclusion: Findings suggest rising incidence and high prevalence of PCa in Nigeria. Advanced PCa was most common at diagnosis and mortality was high. There is need for improved strategies and policies for early detection of PCa in Nigeria.

Purpose: We aimed to (1) determine the extent of coverage of colorectal cancer patients in Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), (2) assess coverage difference between persistent poverty and other areas, and (3) identify patient, tumor, and area factors associated with inclusion in APCD.

Methods: Data were from 2018 to 2020 Arkansas APCD linked with 2019 Arkansas Central Cancer Registry (ACCR). We constructed four cohorts to assess APCD's coverage of CRC patients: (Cohort 1) ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in APCD in 2019; (Cohort 2) APCD coverage in the diagnosis month; continuous APCD coverage in the 30; Year around diagnosis (six months before to five months after diagnosis month) (Cohort 3); or until death within six months (Cohort 4). We compared proportions in the cohorts by area persistent poverty designation. Logistic regressions identified factors associated with inclusion in APCD cohorts.

Patient selection: CRC patients diagnosed in 2019 from ACCR, excluding in situ disease.

Results: Of the 1,510 CRC patients diagnosed in 2019, 83% had ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in 2019 APCD (Cohort1), 81% had coverage in the diagnosis month (Cohort 2), and 63% had continuous coverage in the year around diagnosis (Cohort 3). Additionally, 11% died within six months but had continuous coverage until death (Cohort 4, 74%). No coverage difference was found between persist poverty and other areas. Age and primary payer type at diagnosis were the main predictors of inclusion in APCD.

Conclusion: Arkansas APCD had high coverage of Arkansas CRC patients. No selection bias by area of persistent poverty designation was present.

Introduction: In response to high levels of cancer disparities in Philadelphia, PA, three NCI-designated clinical cancer centers formed Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) to bring stakeholders together and establish infrastructure for future cancer reducing initiatives. The PC3 coalition aimed to develop a prioritized cancer disparities research agenda in order to align cancer center resources and research interests with the concerns of the community about cancer, and to ensure that initiatives were patient- and community-centered.

Methods: Agenda development activities culminated in a city-wide cancer disparities conference. The conference, attended by 55 diverse stakeholders, was the venue for small group discussion sessions about cancer concerns related to prevention, early detection, treatment, survivorship, and quality of life. Sessions were guided by a moderator guide and were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed by the PC3 leadership team. Results were reviewed and consensus was achieved with the help of PC3's Stakeholder Advisory Committee.

Results: Stakeholders identified four thematic areas as top priorities for cancer disparities research and action in Philadelphia: communication between patients, providers, and caregivers; education that reaches patients and community members with tailored and targeted information; navigation that assists people in finding and accessing the right cancer screening or treatment option for them; and representation that diversifies the workforce in clinics, cancer centers, and research offices.

Conclusion: A community-informed, prioritized research agenda provides a road map for the three cancer centers to collaborate on future initiatives that are important to patients and stakeholders, to ultimately reduce the burden of cancer for all Philadelphians.

Purpose: Clinical trials are essential to the advancement of cancer care. However, clinical trial knowledge and participation remain critically low among adult patients with cancer. Health information technology (HIT) could play an important role in improving clinical trial knowledge and engagement among cancer survivors.

Methods: We used data from 3,794 adults who completed the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey, 626 (16.2%) of whom were cancer survivors. We examined the prevalence of HIT use in the study population and by cancer history using chi-squared tests. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the impact of HIT use on clinical trial knowledge for cancer survivors and respondents with no cancer history, respectively.

Results: Approximately 63.8% of cancer survivors reported having some knowledge of clinical trials. Almost half of the cancer survivors used HIT to communicate with doctors (47.1%) and make health appointments (49.4%), 68.0% used HIT to look up health information online and 42.2% used it to check test results. In the adjusted models, the use of HIT in communicating with doctors [OR 2.79; 95% CI (1.41, 5.54)], looking up health information online [OR 2.84; 95% CI (1.04, 7.77)], and checking test results [OR 2.47; 95% CI (1.12, 5.43)] was associated with having some knowledge of clinical trials.

Conclusion: HIT use for engaging with the healthcare team and health information gathering is associated with higher clinical trial knowledge in cancer survivors. Given the rapid increase in mobile technology access globally and the increased use of HIT, digital technology can be leveraged to improve clinical trial knowledge and engagement among cancer survivors.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to explore the association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women aged ≥ 18 years with an initial mastitis diagnosis from 315 office-based gynecologists in Germany between January 2005 and December 2021. Women without mastitis were matched to women with mastitis using propensity score matching based on age, index year, average yearly consultation frequency during the follow-up period, and coexisting diseases such as obesity, benign mammary dysplasia, hypertrophy of the breast, unspecified lump of breast, and other disorders of the breast. The 10-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer for the mastitis-cohort and non-mastitis-cohort was studied with Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. The association between mastitis and breast cancer was studied separately for four age groups with univariable Cox regression analyses.

Results: In the follow-up period of 7 months to 10 years after the index date, 2.9% of mastitis patients and 2.4% of matched non-mastitis patients were diagnosed with breast cancer. A Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11-1.70). According to the age-stratified analyses, a strong and significant association was only observed in the age group > 50 years (HR: 1.73; 95% 1.25-2.40).

Conclusion: The findings of our retrospective cohort study support an association between mastitis and subsequent breast cancer diagnoses in women aged > 50 years. The pathophysiological basis and possibility of confounders however requires further investigation.

Background: Lung cancer is a deadly cancer. Early diagnosis and access to timely treatment are essential to maximizing the likelihood of survival. Indigenous peoples experience enduring disparities in lung cancer survival, and disparities in access to and through lung cancer services is one of the important drivers of these disparities. In this manuscript, we aimed to examine the current evidence on disparities in Indigenous access to services along the lung cancer treatment pathway.

Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted for all manuscripts and reports published up until July 20, 2022, using Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Following the identification of eligible literature, full-text versions were scanned for relevance for inclusion in this review, and relevant information was extracted. After scanning 1,459 documents for inclusion, our final review included 36 manuscripts and reports that included information on lung cancer service access for Indigenous peoples relative to non-Indigenous peoples. These documents included data from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the USA (including Hawai'i).

Results: Our review found evidence of disparities in access to, and the journey through, lung cancer care for Indigenous peoples. Disparities were most obvious in access to early detection and surgery, with inconsistent evidence regarding other components of the pathway.

Conclusion: These observations are made amid relatively scant data in a global sense, highlighting the need for improved data collection and monitoring of cancer care and outcomes for Indigenous peoples worldwide. Access to early detection and guideline-concordant treatment are essential to addressing enduring disparities in cancer survival experienced by Indigenous peoples globally.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening recommendations do not support prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for older men. Such screening often occurs, however. It is, therefore, important to understand how frequently and among which subgroups screening occurs, and the extent of distant stage PCa diagnoses among screened older men.

Methods: Using the 2014-2016 linked Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) and Medicare administrative database, we identified men 68 and older diagnosed with PCa and categorized their PSA testing in the three years preceding diagnosis as screening or diagnostic. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify correlates of screening PSA and to determine whether screening PSA is independently associated with distant stage disease.

Results: Our study population included 3034 patients (median age: 73 years). 62.1% of PCa patients underwent at least one screening-based PSA in the three years preceding diagnosis. Older age (75-84 years: aOR [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.71, 0.99], ≥ 85: aOR: 0.27 [0.19, 0.38]), and frailty (aOR: 0.51 [0.37, 0.71]) were associated with lower screening. Screening was associated with decreased odds of distant stage disease (aOR: 0.55 [0.42, 0.71]). However, older age (75-84 years: aOR: 2.43 [1.82, 3.25], ≥ 85: aOR: 10.57 [7.05, 15.85]), frailty (aOR: 5.00 [2.78, 9.31]), and being separated or divorced (aOR: 1.64 [1.01, 2.60]) were associated with increased distant stage PCa.

Conclusion: PSA screening in older men is common, though providers appear to curtail PSA screening as age and frailty increase. Screened older men are diagnosed at earlier stages, but the harms of screening cannot be assessed.

Purpose: Sleep is a multi-dimensional human function that is associated with cancer outcomes. Previous work on sleep and cancer mortality have not investigated how this relationship varies by sex and cancer site. We investigated the association of sleep duration and perceived insomnia with site-specific and overall cancer mortality among participants in the Cancer Prevention Study-II.

Methods: Sleep was collected at baseline in 1982 among 1.2 million cancer-free US adults. Cancer-specific mortality was determined through 2018. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for overall and site-specific cancer mortality, stratified by sex.

Results: Among 983,105 participants (56% female) followed for a median of 27.9 person-years, there were 146,911 primary cancer deaths. Results from the adjusted model showed short (6 h/night) and long (8 h/night and 9-14 h/night) sleep duration, compared to 7 h/night, were associated with a modest 2%, 2%, and 5% higher risk of overall cancer mortality, respectively, and there was a significant non-linear trend (p-trend < 0.01). This non-linear trend was statistically significant among male (p-trend < 0.001) but not female (p-trend 0.71) participants. For male participants, short and long sleep were associated with higher risk of lung cancer mortality and long sleep was associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer mortality. Perceived insomnia was associated with a 3-7% lower risk of overall cancer mortality.

Conclusion: Sleep is important to consider in relation to sex- and site-specific cancer mortality. Future research should investigate other components of sleep in relation to cancer mortality.

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is a significant public health concern and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. This study aimed to investigate pancreatic cancer mortality trends and disparities in the United States (US) from 1999 to 2020.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Mortality rates were age-adjusted and standardized to the year 2000 US population. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze temporal trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) by sociodemographic and geographic variables.

Results: Between 1999 and 2020, pancreatic cancer led to a total of 810,628 deaths in the US, an average mortality of nearly 39,000 deaths per year. The AAMR slightly increased from 10.6 in 1999 to 11.1 in 2020, with an associated annual percent change (APC) of 0.2. Mortality rates were highest among individuals aged 65 and older. Black individuals experienced the highest overall pancreatic cancer-related AAMR at 13.8. Despite this, Black individuals experienced a decreasing mortality trend over time (APC -0.2) while White individuals experienced an increasing trend in mortality (APC 0.4). Additionally, individuals residing in rural areas experienced steeper rates of mortality increase than those living in urban areas (APC 0.6 for rural vs -0.2 for urban). White individuals in urban and rural populations experienced an increase in mortality, while Black individuals in urban environments experienced a decrease in mortality, and Black individuals in rural environments experienced stable mortality trends.

Conclusions: Mortality from pancreatic cancer continues to increase in the US, with racial and regional disparities identified in minorities and rural-dwelling individuals. These disparate findings highlight the importance of ongoing efforts to understand and address pancreatic cancer treatment and outcomes disparities in the US, and future studies should further investigate the underlying etiologies of these disparities and potential for novel therapies to reduce the mortality.