首页 > 最新文献

Cancer Causes & Control最新文献

英文 中文
Cancer fatalism, social media informational awareness, and education. 癌症宿命论、社交媒体信息意识和教育。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01896-y
Jim P Stimpson, Sungchul Park, Mayra Rodriguez, Miguel Ángel Cano, Alexander N Ortega

Objective: Understand if cancer fatalism among adult social media users in the United States is linked to social media informational awareness and if the relationship varies by education level.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 3,948) were analyzed using multivariable linear probability models. The study population was defined as social media users active within the past year. The outcome variable was cancer fatalism and the predictor variables were social media informational awareness and education level.

Results: Participants with low social media informational awareness were 9% (95% CI = 3, 15), 6% (95% CI = 1, 11), and 21% (95% CI = 14, 27) percentage points more likely to agree that it seems like everything causes cancer, you cannot lower your chances of getting cancer, and there are too many cancer prevention recommendations to follow, respectively. Participants with a college degree or higher level of education and who reported high social media informational awareness were the least likely to agree that everything causes cancer (60%; 95% CI = 54, 66), you cannot lower your chances of getting cancer (14%; 95% CI = 10, 19), and there are too many cancer prevention recommendations to follow (52%; 95% CI = 46, 59).

Conclusion: Social media informational awareness was associated with lower levels of cancer fatalism among adult social media users. College graduates with high social media informational awareness were the least likely to report cancer fatalism.

目的了解美国社交媒体成年用户中的癌症宿命论是否与社交媒体信息意识有关,以及这种关系是否因教育水平而异:采用多变量线性概率模型分析了 2022 年健康信息全国趋势调查的横截面数据(n = 3948)。研究人群定义为在过去一年中活跃的社交媒体用户。结果变量为癌症宿命论,预测变量为社交媒体信息意识和教育水平:结果:社交媒体信息认知度低的参与者同意 "似乎一切都会导致癌症"、"您无法降低患癌几率 "和 "有太多癌症预防建议需要遵循 "的可能性分别高出 9% (95% CI = 3, 15)、6% (95% CI = 1, 11) 和 21% (95% CI = 14, 27)个百分点。拥有大学学位或更高教育水平且社交媒体信息意识较高的参与者最不可能同意 "万物致癌"(60%;95% CI = 54,66)、"无法降低患癌几率"(14%;95% CI = 10,19)以及 "有太多癌症预防建议需要遵循"(52%;95% CI = 46,59):结论:社交媒体信息意识与成年社交媒体用户较低的癌症宿命论水平有关。具有较高社交媒体信息意识的大学毕业生最不可能报告癌症宿命论。
{"title":"Cancer fatalism, social media informational awareness, and education.","authors":"Jim P Stimpson, Sungchul Park, Mayra Rodriguez, Miguel Ángel Cano, Alexander N Ortega","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01896-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10552-024-01896-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understand if cancer fatalism among adult social media users in the United States is linked to social media informational awareness and if the relationship varies by education level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (n = 3,948) were analyzed using multivariable linear probability models. The study population was defined as social media users active within the past year. The outcome variable was cancer fatalism and the predictor variables were social media informational awareness and education level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with low social media informational awareness were 9% (95% CI = 3, 15), 6% (95% CI = 1, 11), and 21% (95% CI = 14, 27) percentage points more likely to agree that it seems like everything causes cancer, you cannot lower your chances of getting cancer, and there are too many cancer prevention recommendations to follow, respectively. Participants with a college degree or higher level of education and who reported high social media informational awareness were the least likely to agree that everything causes cancer (60%; 95% CI = 54, 66), you cannot lower your chances of getting cancer (14%; 95% CI = 10, 19), and there are too many cancer prevention recommendations to follow (52%; 95% CI = 46, 59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social media informational awareness was associated with lower levels of cancer fatalism among adult social media users. College graduates with high social media informational awareness were the least likely to report cancer fatalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":"1383-1392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141475979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda. 制定全市范围的、社区参与的癌症差异研究议程。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01919-8
Amy E Leader, Yawei Song, Evelyn T González, Thierry Fortune, Nilsa Graciani, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, Karen Glanz

Introduction: In response to high levels of cancer disparities in Philadelphia, PA, three NCI-designated clinical cancer centers formed Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) to bring stakeholders together and establish infrastructure for future cancer reducing initiatives. The PC3 coalition aimed to develop a prioritized cancer disparities research agenda in order to align cancer center resources and research interests with the concerns of the community about cancer, and to ensure that initiatives were patient- and community-centered.

Methods: Agenda development activities culminated in a city-wide cancer disparities conference. The conference, attended by 55 diverse stakeholders, was the venue for small group discussion sessions about cancer concerns related to prevention, early detection, treatment, survivorship, and quality of life. Sessions were guided by a moderator guide and were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed by the PC3 leadership team. Results were reviewed and consensus was achieved with the help of PC3's Stakeholder Advisory Committee.

Results: Stakeholders identified four thematic areas as top priorities for cancer disparities research and action in Philadelphia: communication between patients, providers, and caregivers; education that reaches patients and community members with tailored and targeted information; navigation that assists people in finding and accessing the right cancer screening or treatment option for them; and representation that diversifies the workforce in clinics, cancer centers, and research offices.

Conclusion: A community-informed, prioritized research agenda provides a road map for the three cancer centers to collaborate on future initiatives that are important to patients and stakeholders, to ultimately reduce the burden of cancer for all Philadelphians.

简介:针对宾夕法尼亚州费城癌症发病率较高的问题,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的三家临床癌症中心成立了费城社区战胜癌症联盟(PC3),将利益相关者聚集在一起,为未来减少癌症发病率的行动建立基础设施。PC3 联盟的目标是制定一个优先癌症差异研究议程,以便将癌症中心的资源和研究兴趣与社区对癌症的关注结合起来,并确保各项举措以患者和社区为中心:方法:制定议程的活动在全市癌症差异会议上达到高潮。55 名不同的利益相关者参加了此次会议,并在会上就预防、早期发现、治疗、生存和生活质量等方面的癌症问题进行了小组讨论。会议由主持人指导,PC3 领导小组对会议进行了录音、转录和分析。在 PC3 利益相关者咨询委员会的帮助下,对结果进行了审查并达成了共识:结果:利益相关者确定了费城癌症差异研究和行动的四个优先主题领域:患者、医疗服务提供者和护理人员之间的沟通;为患者和社区成员提供量身定制的、有针对性的信息的教育;帮助人们找到并获得适合他们的癌症筛查或治疗方案的导航;以及使诊所、癌症中心和研究办公室的员工队伍多元化的代表性:以社区为基础的优先研究议程为三个癌症中心提供了一个路线图,使其能够就对患者和利益相关者非常重要的未来计划开展合作,最终减轻所有费城人的癌症负担。
{"title":"Developing a city-wide, community-engaged cancer disparities research agenda.","authors":"Amy E Leader, Yawei Song, Evelyn T González, Thierry Fortune, Nilsa Graciani, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson, Karen Glanz","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01919-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01919-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In response to high levels of cancer disparities in Philadelphia, PA, three NCI-designated clinical cancer centers formed Philadelphia Communities Conquering Cancer (PC3) to bring stakeholders together and establish infrastructure for future cancer reducing initiatives. The PC3 coalition aimed to develop a prioritized cancer disparities research agenda in order to align cancer center resources and research interests with the concerns of the community about cancer, and to ensure that initiatives were patient- and community-centered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Agenda development activities culminated in a city-wide cancer disparities conference. The conference, attended by 55 diverse stakeholders, was the venue for small group discussion sessions about cancer concerns related to prevention, early detection, treatment, survivorship, and quality of life. Sessions were guided by a moderator guide and were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed by the PC3 leadership team. Results were reviewed and consensus was achieved with the help of PC3's Stakeholder Advisory Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders identified four thematic areas as top priorities for cancer disparities research and action in Philadelphia: communication between patients, providers, and caregivers; education that reaches patients and community members with tailored and targeted information; navigation that assists people in finding and accessing the right cancer screening or treatment option for them; and representation that diversifies the workforce in clinics, cancer centers, and research offices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A community-informed, prioritized research agenda provides a road map for the three cancer centers to collaborate on future initiatives that are important to patients and stakeholders, to ultimately reduce the burden of cancer for all Philadelphians.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Nigeria: a mixed methods systematic review. 尼日利亚前列腺癌流行病学:混合方法系统综述。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01917-w
Chinonyerem O Iheanacho, Okechukwu H Enechukwu

Purpose: Prostate cancer (PCa) is an increasing burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. This systematic review examined the incidence, prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PCa in Nigeria.

Methods: This review followed the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies that focused on epidemiology of PCa in Nigeria, published between 1990 and 2023 and written in English were eligible. Combination of keywords was used to search PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, AJOL and web of science databases. A piloted form by the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template was used to extract data from retrieved studies. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies.

Results: Of the 1898 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. All included studies showed good quality. Mean age for PCa ranged from 55 to 71 years, with a higher prevalence occurring within 60-69 years. A 7.7 fold increase in PCa incidence was reported for the years 1997-2006, while an average annual increase in incidence rate of 11.95% was observed from 2009 to 2013. Hospital-based prevalence of 14%-46.4% was observed for clinically active PCa. Patients presented for diagnosis with high Gleason scores and advanced PCa. High mortality (15.6%-64.0%) occurred between 6 months and 3 years of diagnosis.

Conclusion: Findings suggest rising incidence and high prevalence of PCa in Nigeria. Advanced PCa was most common at diagnosis and mortality was high. There is need for improved strategies and policies for early detection of PCa in Nigeria.

目的:前列腺癌(PCa)是撒哈拉以南非洲地区日益沉重的负担。本系统综述研究了尼日利亚 PCa 的发病率、流行率、临床特征和结果:本综述遵循标准的《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)2020 指南。符合条件的同行评议观察性研究侧重于尼日利亚 PCa 的流行病学,发表于 1990 年至 2023 年之间,以英语撰写。使用关键词组合搜索 PubMed、Scopus、Google scholar、AJOL 和 web of science 数据库。从检索到的研究中提取数据时,使用了科克伦公共卫生组数据提取和评估模板的试行表格。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华观察性研究量表对纳入的研究进行质量评估:结果:在检索到的 1898 篇文章中,有 21 篇符合纳入标准。所有纳入研究的质量均良好。PCa 的平均年龄在 55 岁至 71 岁之间,60 岁至 69 岁的发病率较高。据报道,1997-2006年间,PCa发病率增长了7.7倍,而2009-2013年间,发病率平均每年增长11.95%。临床活跃的 PCa 在医院的发病率为 14%-46.4%。前来就诊的患者均为高Gleason评分和晚期PCa患者。高死亡率(15.6%-64.0%)发生在确诊后的6个月至3年之间:研究结果表明,尼日利亚 PCa 的发病率和患病率均呈上升趋势。晚期 PCa 在确诊时最为常见,死亡率也很高。尼日利亚需要改进早期检测 PCa 的策略和政策。
{"title":"Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Nigeria: a mixed methods systematic review.","authors":"Chinonyerem O Iheanacho, Okechukwu H Enechukwu","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01917-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01917-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) is an increasing burden in Sub-Saharan Africa. This systematic review examined the incidence, prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PCa in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review followed the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed observational studies that focused on epidemiology of PCa in Nigeria, published between 1990 and 2023 and written in English were eligible. Combination of keywords was used to search PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, AJOL and web of science databases. A piloted form by the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template was used to extract data from retrieved studies. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1898 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. All included studies showed good quality. Mean age for PCa ranged from 55 to 71 years, with a higher prevalence occurring within 60-69 years. A 7.7 fold increase in PCa incidence was reported for the years 1997-2006, while an average annual increase in incidence rate of 11.95% was observed from 2009 to 2013. Hospital-based prevalence of 14%-46.4% was observed for clinically active PCa. Patients presented for diagnosis with high Gleason scores and advanced PCa. High mortality (15.6%-64.0%) occurred between 6 months and 3 years of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest rising incidence and high prevalence of PCa in Nigeria. Advanced PCa was most common at diagnosis and mortality was high. There is need for improved strategies and policies for early detection of PCa in Nigeria.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the coverage of the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database for examining health disparities related to persistent poverty areas in colorectal cancer patients. 调查阿肯色州全付费者索赔数据库的覆盖范围,以研究结直肠癌患者中与持续贫困地区有关的健康差异。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01918-9
Chenghui Li, Cheng Peng, Peter DelNero, Jonathan Laryea, Daniela Ramirez Aguilar, Güneş Koru, Yong-Moon Mark Park, Mahima Saini, Mario Schootman

Purpose: We aimed to (1) determine the extent of coverage of colorectal cancer patients in Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), (2) assess coverage difference between persistent poverty and other areas, and (3) identify patient, tumor, and area factors associated with inclusion in APCD.

Methods: Data were from 2018 to 2020 Arkansas APCD linked with 2019 Arkansas Central Cancer Registry (ACCR). We constructed four cohorts to assess APCD's coverage of CRC patients: (Cohort 1) ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in APCD in 2019; (Cohort 2) APCD coverage in the diagnosis month; continuous APCD coverage in the 30; Year around diagnosis (six months before to five months after diagnosis month) (Cohort 3); or until death within six months (Cohort 4). We compared proportions in the cohorts by area persistent poverty designation. Logistic regressions identified factors associated with inclusion in APCD cohorts.

Patient selection: CRC patients diagnosed in 2019 from ACCR, excluding in situ disease.

Results: Of the 1,510 CRC patients diagnosed in 2019, 83% had ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in 2019 APCD (Cohort1), 81% had coverage in the diagnosis month (Cohort 2), and 63% had continuous coverage in the year around diagnosis (Cohort 3). Additionally, 11% died within six months but had continuous coverage until death (Cohort 4, 74%). No coverage difference was found between persist poverty and other areas. Age and primary payer type at diagnosis were the main predictors of inclusion in APCD.

Conclusion: Arkansas APCD had high coverage of Arkansas CRC patients. No selection bias by area of persistent poverty designation was present.

目的:我们旨在(1)确定阿肯色州全付费者索赔数据库(APCD)对结直肠癌患者的覆盖范围;(2)评估持续贫困地区与其他地区的覆盖差异;(3)确定与纳入APCD相关的患者、肿瘤和地区因素:数据来自 2018 年至 2020 年阿肯色州 APCD 与 2019 年阿肯色州中央癌症登记处(ACCR)的链接。我们构建了四个队列来评估 APCD 对 CRC 患者的覆盖情况:(队列 1)2019 年 APCD 的医疗覆盖时间≥ 1 天;(队列 2)诊断当月 APCD 的覆盖时间;30 年内 APCD 的连续覆盖时间;诊断前后一年(诊断当月前 6 个月至诊断当月后 5 个月)(队列 3);或直到 6 个月内死亡(队列 4)。我们比较了不同地区持续贫困人口在队列中的比例。逻辑回归确定了纳入 APCD 队列的相关因素:患者选择:2019 年从 ACCR 诊断出的 CRC 患者,不包括原位疾病:在 2019 年确诊的 1510 名 CRC 患者中,83% 的患者在 2019 年 APCD(队列 1)中的医疗保险天数≥1 天,81% 的患者在确诊当月(队列 2)中有保险,63% 的患者在确诊前后一年中连续有保险(队列 3)。此外,有 11% 的人在 6 个月内死亡,但在死亡前一直享有保险(队列 4,74%)。在持续贫困地区和其他地区之间未发现覆盖率差异。年龄和诊断时的主要付款人类型是纳入 APCD 的主要预测因素:阿肯色州 APCD 对阿肯色州 CRC 患者的覆盖率很高。不存在持续贫困地区的选择偏差。
{"title":"Investigating the coverage of the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database for examining health disparities related to persistent poverty areas in colorectal cancer patients.","authors":"Chenghui Li, Cheng Peng, Peter DelNero, Jonathan Laryea, Daniela Ramirez Aguilar, Güneş Koru, Yong-Moon Mark Park, Mahima Saini, Mario Schootman","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01918-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01918-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to (1) determine the extent of coverage of colorectal cancer patients in Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), (2) assess coverage difference between persistent poverty and other areas, and (3) identify patient, tumor, and area factors associated with inclusion in APCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from 2018 to 2020 Arkansas APCD linked with 2019 Arkansas Central Cancer Registry (ACCR). We constructed four cohorts to assess APCD's coverage of CRC patients: (Cohort 1) ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in APCD in 2019; (Cohort 2) APCD coverage in the diagnosis month; continuous APCD coverage in the 30; Year around diagnosis (six months before to five months after diagnosis month) (Cohort 3); or until death within six months (Cohort 4). We compared proportions in the cohorts by area persistent poverty designation. Logistic regressions identified factors associated with inclusion in APCD cohorts.</p><p><strong>Patient selection: </strong>CRC patients diagnosed in 2019 from ACCR, excluding in situ disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,510 CRC patients diagnosed in 2019, 83% had ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in 2019 APCD (Cohort1), 81% had coverage in the diagnosis month (Cohort 2), and 63% had continuous coverage in the year around diagnosis (Cohort 3). Additionally, 11% died within six months but had continuous coverage until death (Cohort 4, 74%). No coverage difference was found between persist poverty and other areas. Age and primary payer type at diagnosis were the main predictors of inclusion in APCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Arkansas APCD had high coverage of Arkansas CRC patients. No selection bias by area of persistent poverty designation was present.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Lithuania. 2 型糖尿病患者罹患膀胱癌的风险:立陶宛一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01911-2
Adomas Ladukas, Ausvydas Patasius, Marius Kincius, Mingaile Drevinskaite, Justinas Jonusas, Donata Linkeviciute-Ulinskiene, Lina Zabuliene, Giedre Smailyte

Purpose: The objective of our study was to evaluate bladder cancer risk among Lithuanian type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and the effect of antihyperglycemic therapy on bladder cancer risk.

Methods: We analyzed bladder cancer risk in a cohort of patients who were diagnosed with T2DM between 2001 and 2012 in Lithuania. Bladder cancer risk in four groups of antihyperglycemic medication users (insulin-only, metformin-only, sulfonylurea-only, and pioglitazone ± any other drug) was also assessed. Standardized incidence ratios for bladder cancer were calculated.

Results: A total of 76,818 patients (28,762 males and 48,056 females) with T2DM were included in the final cohort. In the whole cohort of diabetic patients, 277 bladder cancer cases were observed, compared to 232.75 expected cases, according to bladder cancer rates in the general population (Standardized Incidence Ratio 1.19; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.06-1.34). Higher risk of bladder cancer was found in both men and women; however, in women the risk increase was not statistically significant. We found higher risk of bladder cancer in patients of both sexes diagnosed with T2DM at the age of 50-79 years and also in all groups of different antihyperglycemic medication users.

Conclusion: T2DM was associated with increased risk of bladder cancer.

目的:我们的研究旨在评估立陶宛 2 型糖尿病 (T2DM) 患者罹患膀胱癌的风险,以及降糖治疗对膀胱癌风险的影响:我们分析了立陶宛 2001 年至 2012 年期间确诊为 T2DM 患者的膀胱癌风险。我们还评估了四组降糖药物使用者(仅使用胰岛素、仅使用二甲双胍、仅使用磺脲类药物以及使用吡格列酮和其他药物)的膀胱癌风险。计算了膀胱癌的标准化发病率:共有 76,818 名 T2DM 患者(男性 28,762 人,女性 48,056 人)被纳入最终队列。在整个糖尿病患者队列中,共观察到 277 例膀胱癌病例,而根据普通人群的膀胱癌发病率,预期病例数为 232.75 例(标准化发病率比 1.19;95% 置信区间:1.06-1.34)。男性和女性罹患膀胱癌的风险都较高;不过,女性罹患膀胱癌的风险增加在统计学上并不显著。我们发现,在 50-79 岁被诊断出患有 T2DM 的男女患者中,以及在所有使用不同降糖药物的人群中,膀胱癌的风险都较高:结论:T2DM 与膀胱癌风险增加有关。
{"title":"Risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Lithuania.","authors":"Adomas Ladukas, Ausvydas Patasius, Marius Kincius, Mingaile Drevinskaite, Justinas Jonusas, Donata Linkeviciute-Ulinskiene, Lina Zabuliene, Giedre Smailyte","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01911-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01911-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of our study was to evaluate bladder cancer risk among Lithuanian type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and the effect of antihyperglycemic therapy on bladder cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed bladder cancer risk in a cohort of patients who were diagnosed with T2DM between 2001 and 2012 in Lithuania. Bladder cancer risk in four groups of antihyperglycemic medication users (insulin-only, metformin-only, sulfonylurea-only, and pioglitazone ± any other drug) was also assessed. Standardized incidence ratios for bladder cancer were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76,818 patients (28,762 males and 48,056 females) with T2DM were included in the final cohort. In the whole cohort of diabetic patients, 277 bladder cancer cases were observed, compared to 232.75 expected cases, according to bladder cancer rates in the general population (Standardized Incidence Ratio 1.19; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.06-1.34). Higher risk of bladder cancer was found in both men and women; however, in women the risk increase was not statistically significant. We found higher risk of bladder cancer in patients of both sexes diagnosed with T2DM at the age of 50-79 years and also in all groups of different antihyperglycemic medication users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>T2DM was associated with increased risk of bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The causal and mediation effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on lung cancer subtypes: a two-sample mendelian randomization study 慢性阻塞性肺病对肺癌亚型的因果和中介效应:双样本泯灭随机研究
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01916-x
Xue Zhang, Jinze Zhang, Zhe Wang

Purpose

This study aims to determine the causal effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on different subtypes of lung cancer and to investigate the mediation effects of COPD between smoking and the subtypes of lung cancer.

Methods

The study utilized summary level data from genome-wide association studies. It extracted independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) to serve as instrumental variables (IV). We conducted two-sample MR analyses primarily using inverse-variance weighting, as well as MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO to establish and validate the causal impact of COPD on lung cancer subtypes. Additionally, multivariable MR analysis was employed to ascertain the mediating role of COPD between smoking and lung cancers.

Results

The two-sample MR analysis demonstrated that COPD is linked to an elevated risk of lung adenocarcinoma (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.35–1.61, p = 0.009) and squamous cell carcinoma (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.62–1.93, p = 0.001). Further, using multivariable MR, it was established that COPD mediates the causal effects of smoking on lung adenocarcinoma by 56.52% (95% CI 17.51–95.52%) and 63.61% (95% CI 38.31–88.92%) in lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

Our study found that COPD was a risk factor for developing both lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. COPD also played a crucial role in mediating the causal effects of smoking on these two subtypes of lung cancer.

目的 本研究旨在确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)对不同亚型肺癌的因果效应,并探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病在吸烟与肺癌亚型之间的中介效应。研究利用全基因组关联研究的汇总数据,提取独立的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)作为工具变量(IV)。我们主要使用逆方差加权法进行了双样本 MR 分析,并进行了 MR-Egger 和 MR-PRESSO 分析,以确定并验证慢性阻塞性肺病对肺癌亚型的因果影响。结果双样本 MR 分析表明,慢性阻塞性肺病与肺腺癌(OR:1.48,95% CI 1.35-1.61,p = 0.009)和鳞癌(OR:1.78,95% CI 1.62-1.93,p = 0.001)风险升高有关。此外,通过使用多变量磁共振成像,确定了慢性阻塞性肺病在吸烟对肺腺癌和肺鳞癌的因果效应中分别起着 56.52% (95% CI 17.51-95.52%) 和 63.61% (95% CI 38.31-88.92%) 的中介作用。我们的研究发现,慢性阻塞性肺病是肺腺癌和肺鳞癌的危险因素,慢性阻塞性肺病还在吸烟对这两种亚型肺癌的因果效应中起着关键作用。
{"title":"The causal and mediation effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on lung cancer subtypes: a two-sample mendelian randomization study","authors":"Xue Zhang, Jinze Zhang, Zhe Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01916-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01916-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aims to determine the causal effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on different subtypes of lung cancer and to investigate the mediation effects of COPD between smoking and the subtypes of lung cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The study utilized summary level data from genome-wide association studies. It extracted independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) to serve as instrumental variables (IV). We conducted two-sample MR analyses primarily using inverse-variance weighting, as well as MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO to establish and validate the causal impact of COPD on lung cancer subtypes. Additionally, multivariable MR analysis was employed to ascertain the mediating role of COPD between smoking and lung cancers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The two-sample MR analysis demonstrated that COPD is linked to an elevated risk of lung adenocarcinoma (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.35–1.61, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and squamous cell carcinoma (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.62–1.93, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Further, using multivariable MR, it was established that COPD mediates the causal effects of smoking on lung adenocarcinoma by 56.52% (95% CI 17.51–95.52%) and 63.61% (95% CI 38.31–88.92%) in lung squamous cell carcinoma.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our study found that COPD was a risk factor for developing both lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. COPD also played a crucial role in mediating the causal effects of smoking on these two subtypes of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening: 2018–2021 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 食物不安全与结直肠癌筛查之间的关联:2018-2021 年纽约州行为风险因素监测系统 (BRFSS)
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01915-y
Tara Ivic-Pavlicic, Jamilia R. Sly, Stephanie Tuminello, Matthew Untalan, Yasmin Meah, Emanuela Taioli, Sarah J. Miller

Purpose

To assess the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake in screening eligible participants in New York State.

Methods

We analyzed 28,154 adults who participated in New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2018 to 2021, were age-eligible for colorectal cancer screening based on the USPSTF guidelines at the time of survey administration and answered a version of the administered survey that included the module on food insecurity. Participants were defined as food insecure if they self-reported being always, usually, or sometimes stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals in the past 12 months. We compared demographic, healthcare access, overall health status, food insecurity by colorectal cancer screening status. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association of food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening status after adjusting for relevant covariates. Weighted analyses were performed using survey procedures to obtain population estimates.

Results

Food insecurity was statistically significantly associated a decreased likelihood of being up to date on colorectal cancer screening (ORadj 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.94]) and being ever screened for colorectal cancer (ORadj 0.74, 95% CI [0.64, 0.87]) after adjusting for overall health status, healthcare coverage, interview year, age, race/ethnicity, sex, educational attainment, and income. Health status, health coverage, age, and Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity showed positive, statistically significant association with ever being screened and with being up to date for colorectal cancer screening. Lower income, lower educational attainment, and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were statistically significant inverse predictors of ever being screened and being up to date on screening.

Conclusion

This project assessed the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake using the BRFSS survey. Food insecurity may be an important predictor for colorectal cancer screening uptake in eligible adults in the United States. The results from the study can inform future interventions and policies designed to improve participation in routine colorectal cancer screening.

目的 评估纽约州符合筛查条件的参与者中食物不安全与结直肠癌筛查接受率之间的关系。方法 我们分析了 2018 年至 2021 年期间参加纽约州行为危险因素监测系统 (BRFSS) 的 28154 名成年人,他们在接受调查时根据 USPSTF 指南符合结直肠癌筛查的年龄条件,并回答了包含食物不安全模块的调查版本。如果参与者自述在过去 12 个月中总是、通常或有时担心没有足够的钱购买营养餐,则被定义为食物不安全。我们比较了大肠癌筛查状况下的人口统计学、医疗保健获取、总体健康状况和食物不安全状况。在对相关协变量进行调整后,我们进行了多变量分析,以评估食物不安全与结直肠癌筛查状况之间的关联。在对总体健康状况、医疗保险范围、采访年份、年龄、种族/民族、性别、教育程度和收入进行调整后,食物不安全与接受最新结直肠癌筛查的可能性降低(ORadj 0.83,95% CI [0.72,0.94])和接受过结直肠癌筛查的可能性降低(ORadj 0.74,95% CI [0.64,0.87])有显著统计学关联。健康状况、医疗保险、年龄和非西班牙裔黑人种族/人种与是否接受过筛查以及是否接受过最新的结直肠癌筛查有积极的、统计学意义上的联系。较低的收入、较低的教育程度和非西班牙裔亚裔在统计学上显著反向预测曾经接受筛查和最新接受筛查的情况。食物不安全可能是影响美国符合条件的成年人接受结直肠癌筛查的一个重要预测因素。这项研究的结果可以为未来旨在提高常规大肠癌筛查参与率的干预措施和政策提供参考。
{"title":"The association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening: 2018–2021 New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)","authors":"Tara Ivic-Pavlicic, Jamilia R. Sly, Stephanie Tuminello, Matthew Untalan, Yasmin Meah, Emanuela Taioli, Sarah J. Miller","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01915-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01915-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake in screening eligible participants in New York State.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We analyzed 28,154 adults who participated in New York State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2018 to 2021, were age-eligible for colorectal cancer screening based on the USPSTF guidelines at the time of survey administration and answered a version of the administered survey that included the module on food insecurity. Participants were defined as food insecure if they self-reported being always, usually, or sometimes stressed about having enough money to buy nutritious meals in the past 12 months. We compared demographic, healthcare access, overall health status, food insecurity by colorectal cancer screening status. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association of food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening status after adjusting for relevant covariates. Weighted analyses were performed using survey procedures to obtain population estimates.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Food insecurity was statistically significantly associated a decreased likelihood of being up to date on colorectal cancer screening (OR<sub>adj</sub> 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.94]) and being ever screened for colorectal cancer (OR<sub>adj</sub> 0.74, 95% CI [0.64, 0.87]) after adjusting for overall health status, healthcare coverage, interview year, age, race/ethnicity, sex, educational attainment, and income. Health status, health coverage, age, and Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity showed positive, statistically significant association with ever being screened and with being up to date for colorectal cancer screening. Lower income, lower educational attainment, and non-Hispanic Asian race/ethnicity were statistically significant inverse predictors of ever being screened and being up to date on screening.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This project assessed the association between food insecurity and colorectal cancer screening uptake using the BRFSS survey. Food insecurity may be an important predictor for colorectal cancer screening uptake in eligible adults in the United States. The results from the study can inform future interventions and policies designed to improve participation in routine colorectal cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of a guaranteed access program to imatinib on the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia 伊马替尼保障使用计划对慢性髓性白血病患者生存期的影响
IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01912-1
Gilberto Barranco, Itzel Vidal, Dulce Gama, Carlos Martínez, Brenda Acosta, Christian Ramos, Emmanuel Martínez, Juan Zazueta, Irma Olarte, Adolfo Martínez, Eduardo Cervera, Iveth Mendoza, Diana Arcos, Judith Cruz

Purpose

This work aimed to evaluate the impact of a guaranteed access program to imatinib on the survival of patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective, observational, and analytical study of the database of patients diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología and the Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo to assess overall survival based on guaranteed access or not to imatinib.

Results

With an average follow-up of 99 months, all patients’ estimated 20-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI, 76–67). A significant difference was found in the 20-year survival probability in favor of patients with guaranteed access 76% (95% CI, 81–71) vs. 61% (95% CI, 69–52) (p < 0.001), in addition to those in which they had better attachment 81.2% (95% CI, 85–76) vs. 44.9% (95% CI, 52–37) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CML is the most frequent chronic leukemia in Mexico. It mainly affects the economically active population (mean age 40), and the prognosis in our country has improved, emulating developed countries; however, the results depend on access to treatment and proper monitoring.

方法我们对墨西哥国家癌症研究所和墨西哥爱德华多博士总医院的慢性髓性白血病患者数据库进行了一项回顾性、观察性和分析性研究,以评估是否保证伊马替尼的使用对慢性髓性白血病患者总生存期的影响。结果平均随访99个月,所有患者的20年总生存率估计为72%(95% CI,76-67)。结果在平均 99 个月的随访中,所有患者的估计 20 年总生存率为 72%(95% CI,76-67),其中有保障获得伊马替尼的患者的 20 年生存率为 76%(95% CI,81-71),而无保障获得伊马替尼的患者的 20 年生存率为 61%(95% CI,69-52)(p < 0.001),此外,有保障获得伊马替尼的患者的 20 年生存率为 81.2%(95% CI,85-76),而无保障获得伊马替尼的患者的 20 年生存率为 44.9%(95% CI,52-37)(p < 0.001)。它主要影响从事经济活动的人群(平均年龄 40 岁),我国的预后有所改善,正在向发达国家看齐;然而,结果取决于能否获得治疗和适当的监测。
{"title":"Impact of a guaranteed access program to imatinib on the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia","authors":"Gilberto Barranco, Itzel Vidal, Dulce Gama, Carlos Martínez, Brenda Acosta, Christian Ramos, Emmanuel Martínez, Juan Zazueta, Irma Olarte, Adolfo Martínez, Eduardo Cervera, Iveth Mendoza, Diana Arcos, Judith Cruz","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01912-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01912-1","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This work aimed to evaluate the impact of a guaranteed access program to imatinib on the survival of patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We carried out a retrospective, observational, and analytical study of the database of patients diagnosed with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología and the Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo to assess overall survival based on guaranteed access or not to imatinib.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>With an average follow-up of 99 months, all patients’ estimated 20-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI, 76–67). A significant difference was found in the 20-year survival probability in favor of patients with guaranteed access 76% (95% CI, 81–71) vs. 61% (95% CI, 69–52) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), in addition to those in which they had better attachment 81.2% (95% CI, 85–76) vs. 44.9% (95% CI, 52–37) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>CML is the most frequent chronic leukemia in Mexico. It mainly affects the economically active population (mean age 40), and the prognosis in our country has improved, emulating developed countries; however, the results depend on access to treatment and proper monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142197089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness among African and European American men. 非洲裔和欧洲裔美国男性吸烟与前列腺癌的侵袭性。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01883-3
Edgar T Ellis, Brian J Fairman, Shelbie D Stahr, Jeannette T Bensen, James L Mohler, Lixin Song, Eboneé N Butler, L Joseph Su, Ping-Ching Hsu

Purpose: Smoking is a modifiable lifestyle factor that has not been established as a prostate cancer risk factor, nor emphasized in prostate cancer prevention. Studies have shown that African American (AA) smokers have a poorer cancer prognosis than European Americans (EAs), while having a lower prevalence of heavy smoking. We examined the relationship between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness and assessed racial differences in smoking habits on the probability of high-aggressive prostate cancer.

Methods: Using data from the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (n = 1,279), prostate cancer aggressiveness was defined as high or low based on Gleason scores, serum prostate-specific antigen levels, and tumor stage. Cigarette smoking was categorized as current, former, or never smokers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Self-reported current (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.30-3.06) smoking was associated with high-aggressive prostate cancer relative to never smokers. When stratified by self-reported race, the odds of having high-aggressive cancer increased among AA current (OR = 3.58; 95% CI 2.04-6.28) and former smokers (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.38-3.53) compared to AA never smokers, but the odds were diminished among the EA stratum (Pself-reported race x smoking status = 0.003).

Conclusion: Cigarette smoking is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, a relationship modulated by self-reported race. Future research is needed to investigate types of cigarettes smoked and metabolic differences that may be contributing to the racial disparities observed.

目的:吸烟是一种可改变的生活方式,但尚未被确定为前列腺癌的危险因素,也未在前列腺癌预防中得到重视。研究表明,非裔美国人(AA)吸烟者的癌症预后比欧裔美国人(EAs)差,但大量吸烟的发生率较低。我们研究了吸烟与前列腺癌侵袭性之间的关系,并评估了吸烟习惯的种族差异对高侵袭性前列腺癌概率的影响:利用北卡罗来纳州-路易斯安那州前列腺癌项目(n = 1,279)的数据,根据格里森评分、血清前列腺特异性抗原水平和肿瘤分期将前列腺癌侵袭性定义为高或低。吸烟者分为现在吸烟、曾经吸烟和从不吸烟。多变量逻辑回归用于估计调整后的几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):结果:与从不吸烟者相比,自我报告的当前吸烟者(OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.30-3.06)与高进展性前列腺癌相关。如果按自我报告的种族进行分层,与从不吸烟的 AA 族人相比,AA 族人中目前吸烟者(OR = 3.58;95% CI 2.04-6.28)和曾经吸烟者(OR = 2.21;95% CI 1.38-3.53)患高进展性癌症的几率增加,但 EA 族人中的几率降低(自我报告的种族 x 吸烟状况 = 0.003):结论:吸烟与前列腺癌的侵袭性有关,这种关系受自我报告的种族影响。未来的研究需要调查吸烟的类型以及可能导致种族差异的代谢差异。
{"title":"Cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness among African and European American men.","authors":"Edgar T Ellis, Brian J Fairman, Shelbie D Stahr, Jeannette T Bensen, James L Mohler, Lixin Song, Eboneé N Butler, L Joseph Su, Ping-Ching Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01883-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10552-024-01883-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Smoking is a modifiable lifestyle factor that has not been established as a prostate cancer risk factor, nor emphasized in prostate cancer prevention. Studies have shown that African American (AA) smokers have a poorer cancer prognosis than European Americans (EAs), while having a lower prevalence of heavy smoking. We examined the relationship between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness and assessed racial differences in smoking habits on the probability of high-aggressive prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (n = 1,279), prostate cancer aggressiveness was defined as high or low based on Gleason scores, serum prostate-specific antigen levels, and tumor stage. Cigarette smoking was categorized as current, former, or never smokers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reported current (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.30-3.06) smoking was associated with high-aggressive prostate cancer relative to never smokers. When stratified by self-reported race, the odds of having high-aggressive cancer increased among AA current (OR = 3.58; 95% CI 2.04-6.28) and former smokers (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.38-3.53) compared to AA never smokers, but the odds were diminished among the EA stratum (P<sub>self-reported race x smoking status</sub> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cigarette smoking is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, a relationship modulated by self-reported race. Future research is needed to investigate types of cigarettes smoked and metabolic differences that may be contributing to the racial disparities observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":"1259-1269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140956514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of the characteristics of the population eligible for lung cancer screening under 2013 and population newly eligible under 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. 根据 2013 年美国预防服务工作组建议,符合肺癌筛查条件的人群特征与根据 2021 年美国预防服务工作组建议,新符合肺癌筛查条件的人群特征的比较。
IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01880-6
Nicholas Yell, Jan M Eberth, Anthony J Alberg, Peiyin Hung, Mario Schootman, Alexander C McLain, Reginald F Munden

Purpose: In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised their 2013 recommendations for lung cancer screening eligibility by lowering the pack-year history from 30+ to 20+ pack-years and the recommended age from 55 to 50 years. Simulation studies suggest that Black persons and females will benefit most from these changes, but it is unclear how the revised USPSTF recommendations will impact geographic, health-related, and other sociodemographic characteristics of those eligible.

Methods: This cross-sectional study employed data from the 2017-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 23 states to compare age, gender, race, marital, sexual orientation, education, employment, comorbidity, vaccination, region, and rurality characteristics of the eligible population according to the original 2013 USPSTF recommendations with the revised 2021 USPSTF recommendations using chi-squared tests. This study compared those originally eligible to those newly eligible using the BRFSS raking-dervived weighting variable.

Results: There were 30,190 study participants. The results of this study found that eligibility increased by 62.4% due to the revised recommendations. We found that the recommendation changes increased the proportion of eligible females (50.1% vs 44.1%), Black persons (9.2% vs 6.6%), Hispanic persons (4.4% vs 2.7%), persons aged 55-64 (55.8% vs 52.6%), urban-dwellers(88.3% vs 85.9%), unmarried (3.4% vs 2.5%) and never married (10.4% vs 6.6%) persons, as well as non-retirees (76.5% vs 56.1%) Respondents without comorbidities and COPD also increased.

Conclusion: It is estimated that the revision of the lung cancer screening recommendations decreased eligibility disparities in sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, respiratory comorbidities, and vaccination status. Research will be necessary to estimate whether uptake patterns subsequently follow the expanded eligibility patterns.

目的:2021 年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)修订了其 2013 年关于肺癌筛查资格的建议,将包年历史从 30 包以上降至 20 包以上,并将建议年龄从 55 岁降至 50 岁。模拟研究表明,黑人和女性将从这些变化中受益最多,但目前还不清楚修订后的 USPSTF 建议将如何影响符合条件者的地理、健康相关及其他社会人口特征:这项横断面研究采用了来自 23 个州的 2017-2020 年行为风险因素监测系统调查数据,使用秩方检验比较了根据 2013 年 USPSTF 最初建议和修订后的 2021 年 USPSTF 建议符合条件人群的年龄、性别、种族、婚姻、性取向、教育、就业、合并症、疫苗接种、地区和乡村特征。本研究使用 BRFSS raking 衍生的加权变量,对最初符合条件的人群与新符合条件的人群进行了比较:共有 30,190 名研究参与者。研究结果发现,由于修订了建议,符合条件的人数增加了 62.4%。我们发现,建议的修改增加了符合条件的女性比例(50.1% vs 44.1%)、黑人比例(9.2% vs 6.6%)、西班牙裔比例(4.4% vs 2.7%)、55-64 岁人群比例(55.8% vs 52.6%)、城市居民比例(50.1% vs 44.1%)、男性比例(9.2% vs 6.6%)和女性比例(4.4% vs 2.7%)。没有合并症和慢性阻塞性肺病的受访者也有所增加:据估计,肺癌筛查建议的修订减少了性别、种族、民族、婚姻状况、呼吸系统合并症和疫苗接种状况方面的资格差异。有必要进行研究,以估计接受筛查的模式是否会随资格扩大而改变。
{"title":"Comparison of the characteristics of the population eligible for lung cancer screening under 2013 and population newly eligible under 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.","authors":"Nicholas Yell, Jan M Eberth, Anthony J Alberg, Peiyin Hung, Mario Schootman, Alexander C McLain, Reginald F Munden","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01880-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10552-024-01880-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised their 2013 recommendations for lung cancer screening eligibility by lowering the pack-year history from 30+ to 20+ pack-years and the recommended age from 55 to 50 years. Simulation studies suggest that Black persons and females will benefit most from these changes, but it is unclear how the revised USPSTF recommendations will impact geographic, health-related, and other sociodemographic characteristics of those eligible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study employed data from the 2017-2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys from 23 states to compare age, gender, race, marital, sexual orientation, education, employment, comorbidity, vaccination, region, and rurality characteristics of the eligible population according to the original 2013 USPSTF recommendations with the revised 2021 USPSTF recommendations using chi-squared tests. This study compared those originally eligible to those newly eligible using the BRFSS raking-dervived weighting variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 30,190 study participants. The results of this study found that eligibility increased by 62.4% due to the revised recommendations. We found that the recommendation changes increased the proportion of eligible females (50.1% vs 44.1%), Black persons (9.2% vs 6.6%), Hispanic persons (4.4% vs 2.7%), persons aged 55-64 (55.8% vs 52.6%), urban-dwellers(88.3% vs 85.9%), unmarried (3.4% vs 2.5%) and never married (10.4% vs 6.6%) persons, as well as non-retirees (76.5% vs 56.1%) Respondents without comorbidities and COPD also increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is estimated that the revision of the lung cancer screening recommendations decreased eligibility disparities in sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, respiratory comorbidities, and vaccination status. Research will be necessary to estimate whether uptake patterns subsequently follow the expanded eligibility patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":"1233-1243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140875952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1