Cancer Causes & Control最新文献

Purpose: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations experience cancer treatment and survival disparities; however, inconsistent sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within clinical settings and the cancer surveillance system precludes population-based research toward health equity for this population. This qualitative study examined how hospital and central registry abstractors receive and interact with SOGI information and the challenges that they face in doing so.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 abstractors at five Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, as well as seven abstractors from commission on cancer (CoC)-accredited hospital programs in Iowa. Interviews were transcribed, cleaned, and coded using a combination of a priori and emergent codes. These codes were then used to conduct a descriptive analysis and to identify domains across the interviews.

Results: Interviews revealed that abstractors had difficulty locating SOGI information in the medical record: this information was largely never recorded, and when included, was inconsistently/not uniformly located in the medical record. On occasion, abstractors reported situational recording of SOGI information when relevant to the patient's cancer diagnosis. Abstractors further noticed that, where reported, the source of SOGI information (i.e., patient, physician) is largely unknown.

Conclusion: Efforts are needed to ensure standardized implementation of the collection of SOGI variables within the clinical setting, such that this information can be collected by the central cancer registry system to support population-based equity research addressing LGBTQ + disparities.

Purpose: We present findings from an assessment of award recipients' partners from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). We describe partners' processes of identifying and tracking patients undergoing stool-based screening.

Methods: We analyzed data from eight CRCCP award recipients purposively sampled and their partner health systems from 2019 to 2023. The data included number of stool-based tests distributed and returned; abnormal findings; referrals and completion of follow-up colonoscopies; and colonoscopy findings. We also report on strategies to improve tracking of stool-based tests and facilitation of follow-up colonoscopies.

Results: Five of eight CRCCP award recipients reported that all or some partner health systems were able to report stool test return rates. Six had health systems that were able to report abnormal stool test findings. Two reported that health systems could track time to follow-up colonoscopy completion from date of referral, while four could report colonoscopy completion but not the timeframe. Follow-up colonoscopy completion varied substantially from 24.2 to 75.5% (average of 47.9%). Strategies to improve identifying and tracking screening focused mainly on the use of electronic medical records; strategies to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy were multi-level.

Conclusion: Health systems vary in their ability to track steps in the stool-based screening process and few health systems can track time to completion of follow-up colonoscopy. Longer time intervals can result in more advanced disease. CRCCP-associated health systems participating in this study could support the implementation of multicomponent strategies at the individual, provider, and health system levels to improve tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women, with psychosocial stress commonly cited by patients as one of its causes. While there is conflicting epidemiological evidence investigating the association between psychosocial stress and breast cancer incidence and progression, there is reason to believe that interventions aimed at reducing stress pharmacologically or psychologically may improve breast cancer outcomes. The aim of this review is to discuss the molecular and biological mechanisms of stress-attributed breast cancer incidence and progression, including the induction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), as well as decreased immune function and stress hormone-induced resistance to chemotherapy. Moreover, these mechanisms have been cited as potential therapeutic targets of pharmacologic and psychological interventions that may improve the care, well-being and survival of breast cancer patients. Further research is recommended to investigate whether interventions in the primary care setting for women with risk factors for breast cancer development may lead to a decreased incidence of invasive breast tumors.

Purpose: Mental health disorders, substance abuse, and tobacco use are prevalent in the US population. However, the association between these conditions and head and neck cancer (HNC) stage is poorly understood. This research aims to uncover the relationship between pre-existing mental health disorders, substance abuse, and tobacco use and HNC stage at diagnosis in patients receiving care in an integrated, public safety-net healthcare system.

Methods: This study was a secondary data analysis of linked hospital tumor registries and electronic health record (EHR) data. The study's primary independent variables were the comorbidities of mental health disorders, substance abuse, and tobacco use. The dependent variable was HNC stage at diagnosis, operationalized as early stage (i.e., stages I, II, and III) and advanced stage (stage IV, IVA, IVB, or IVC). The analysis included multivariable logistic regression adjusted for covariates of demographic variables, tumor anato RESULTS: The study population consisted of 357 patients with median age of 59 years, and was primarily male (77%), diverse (Black or African American 41%; Hispanic 22%), and from neighborhoods with low income (median average annual household income $39,785). Patients with a history of mental health disorders with or without tobacco use had significantly lower odds of advanced stage HNC at diagnosis (adjusted OR = 0.35, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.17-0.72.) while patients with a history of substance abuse with or without tobacco use had significantly higher odds of advanced stage HNC at diagnosis (adjusted OR 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01-1.98) than patients with no history of mental health disorders, substance abuse, or tobacco use.

Conclusions: The relationship between HNC stage at diagnosis and the comorbidities of mental health disorders, substance abuse, or tobacco differs depending on the type and co-occurrence of these comorbidities. These findings demonstrate the need for innovative care delivery models and education initiatives tailored to meet the needs of patients with mental health disorders, substance abuse, and tobacco use that facilitate early detection of HNC.

Background: There is limited evidence of potential associations between body mass index (BMI) and risk of vulvar and vaginal cancer. We explored these associations in a large cohort of Norwegian women.

Methods: The analytical dataset included 889,441 women aged 16-75 years at baseline in 1963-1975. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between BMI and vulvar and vaginal cancer incidence.

Results: During 30.1 million person-years of follow-up, 1748 incident vulvar and 408 incident vaginal cancer cases occurred. The HRs (95% CIs) for vulvar cancer for a BMI of 15- < 18.5, 18.5- < 25, 25- < 30, 30- < 35, ≥ 35 were 0.62 (0.38-1.01), 1.00 (reference), 1.23 (1.10-1.40), 1.43 (1.23-1.66) and 1.72 (1.35-2.20, p_trend < 0.001), and per 5 kg/m² increment was 1.20 (1.13-1.26). The corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for vaginal cancer were 1.05 (0.52-2.15), 1.00, 0.89 (0.71-1.12), 0.95 (0.68-1.34), and 2.01 (1.29-3.13, p_trend < 0.001), respectively, and per 5 kg/m² was 1.11 (0.99-1.25). The HR (95% CI) per 5 kg/m² increase in BMI at ages 16-29 was 1.28 (1.07-1.54, n = 250 cases) for vulvar and 1.53 (1.11-2.11, n = 66 cases) for vaginal cancers. The HR (95% CI) per 5 kg/m² for early-onset (< 50 years age at diagnosis) vulvar cancer was 0.92 (0.66-1.28, n = 87 cases) and 1.70 (1.05-2.76, n = 21 cases) for vaginal cancer.

Conclusion: These results further support the associations between higher BMI and increased risk of vulvar and vaginal cancers, with suggestive stronger associations between BMI in early adulthood for both cancers and for early-onset vaginal cancer. Further studies are needed to elucidate these findings and investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Purpose: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) individuals experience disparities in cancer screening. We examined whether experience of LGBTQ+ -related discrimination in medical settings was associated with cancer screening disparities.

Methods: Participants were recruited via social media for a cross-sectional survey study. Those who self-reported as LGBTQ+ , being 40+ years of age, and residing in the US were eligible. Participants reported their clinical and demographic characteristics, cancer screening history, and experiences of discrimination in a medical setting. We examined the odds (OR) of ever undergoing cancer screening by experienced discrimination, stratified by sex assigned at birth.

Results: Participants (n = 310) were on average 54.4 ± 9.0 years old and primarily White (92.9%). Most identified as lesbian (38.1%) or gay (40.0%) while 17.1% were transgender or gender diverse. Nearly half (45.5%) reported experiencing LGBTQ+ -related discrimination in the medical setting. Participants assigned female at birth with discriminatory experiences had significantly lower odds of ever undergoing colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy compared to those without discriminatory experiences (OR: 0.37; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.15-0.90). No significant differences in colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy uptake were observed in those assigned male at birth by discriminatory experiences (OR: 2.02; 95% CI 0.59-6.91). Pap tests, mammogram, and stool colorectal cancer screening did not differ by discriminatory experience.

Conclusion: Discrimination in medical settings was commonly reported by LGBTQ+ individuals in this study. When treating LGBTQ+ patients, clinicians should ask about prior experiences and continue to promote cancer screening. Future studies should examine discrimination as a key driver of LGBTQ+ disparities in cancer screening.

Purpose: Smoking after cancer impairs cancer treatment outcomes and prognosis, regardless of cancer type. Prior data suggest that patients with cancers other than lung or head/neck cancer had lower cessation motivation, which in turn predicted lower smoking abstinence. This study evaluated feasibility for a future efficacy trial and assessed the acceptability of brief self-help materials, targeted by cancer type, to enhance cessation motivation.

Methods: Patients had a diagnosis of skin melanoma, breast, bladder, colorectal, or gynecological cancers within ≤ 6 months, smoked ≥ 1 cigarette in the past month, and were not currently participating in a cessation program. After completing a baseline assessment, participants received the booklet corresponding to their cancer type. Follow-ups were conducted 1 week and 1 month post-intervention.

Results: Among 118 patients potentially eligible, 109 were successfully contacted and 53 patients were eligible and all consented. Among consenting patients, 92.5% completed baseline, and 90.6% received the intervention. Among patients receiving the intervention, 91.7% completed all study procedures and follow-up. At 1 month, 87.5% reported reading the booklet and 92.8% rated it as good/excellent. Motivation to quit smoking increased over time among those with lower motivation at baseline, 33.3% sought smoking cessation assistance, and 25.0% were smoke-free 1 month post-intervention.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the first intervention developed for patients with cancers not typically associated with smoking. This low-cost and easy to disseminate intervention has potential to increase motivation to quit smoking among patients with cancers not typically perceived as smoking-related.

Purpose: Few studies have examined whether the incidence rates of invasive breast cancer among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) populations differ by the neighborhood social environment. Thus, we examined associations of ethnic enclave and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) with breast cancer incidence rates among AANHPI females in California.

Methods: A total of 14,738 AANHPI females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2008-2012 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. AANHPI ethnic enclaves (culturally distinct neighborhoods) and nSES were assessed at the census tract level using 2007-2011 American Community Survey data. Breast cancer age-adjusted incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for AANHPI ethnic enclave, nSES, and their joint effects. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stage of disease.

Results: The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in lowest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (quintile (Q)1) were 1.21 times (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11, 1.32) that of AANHPI females living highest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (Q5). In addition, AANHPI females living in highest vs. lowest SES neighborhoods had higher incidence rates of breast cancer (Q5 vs. Q1 IRR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.40). The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in low ethnic enclave + high SES neighborhoods was 1.32 times (95% CI 1.25, 1.39) that of AANHPI females living in high ethnic enclave + low SES neighborhoods. Similar patterns of associations were observed for localized and advanced stage disease.

Conclusion: For AANHPI females in California, incidence rates of breast cancer differed by nSES, ethnic enclave, when considered independently and jointly. Future studies should examine whether the impact of these neighborhood-level factors on breast cancer incidence rates differ across specific AANHPI ethnic groups and investigate the pathways through which they contribute to breast cancer incidence.

Purpose: Social support has been linked to increased use of preventive care services. Living arrangements and residential stability may be important structural sources of social support, but few studies have examined their impact on cancer screening.

Methods: Data were from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Participants were classified as up-to-date or not with female breast cancer (BC), cervical cancer (CVC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between screening and residential stability (< 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-10 years, 11-20 years, or > 20 years), living arrangement (with spouse/partner only, children only, both, or neither), and perceived social support (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, or always available), overall and stratified by sex (CRC) and age group (CVC).

Results: The adjusted odds of BC (odds ratio [OR]  0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) and CVC (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96) screening were lowest for those who reported never/rarely vs. always having social support. The adjusted odds of BC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70) and CRC (OR_FEMALE = 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68; OR_MALE = 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.90) screening were higher for those living with a spouse/partner only vs. those living with neither spouse/partner nor children. Less residential stability was associated with increased CVC screening among females 21-34 years of age, but not BC or CRC screening.

Conclusions: Social support measures were associated with screening to varying degrees by site and age, but higher perceived social support and living with a spouse/partner only demonstrated a consistent positive association. Interventions that mobilize social support networks and address the unmet social needs of parents/caregivers may improve cancer control.

Background: Estrogen may play a role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) carcinogenesis, with effects varying by EOC histotype. Measuring women's long-term exposure to estrogen is difficult, but bone mineral density (BMD) may be a reasonable proxy of longer-term exposure. We examined this relationship by assessing the association between genetic predisposition for higher BMD and risk of EOC by histotype.

Methods: We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess associations between genetic markers for femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD and each EOC histotype. We used multivariable MR (MVMR) to adjust for probable pleiotropic traits, including body mass index, height, menarcheal age, menopausal age, smoking, alcohol intake, and vitamin D.

Results: Univariable analyses suggested greater BMD was associated with increased risk of endometrioid EOC (per standard deviation increase; lumbar spine OR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.93,1.57, femoral neck: OR = 1.25; 0.99,1.57), but sensitivity analyses indicated that pleiotropy was likely. Adjustment using MVMR reduced the magnitude of estimates slightly (lumbar spine: OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.00,1.28, femoral neck: OR = 1.18; 1.03,1.36). Results for lumbar spine BMD and high-grade serous EOC were also suggestive of an association (univariable MR: OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.03,1.30; MVMR: OR = 1.06; 0.99,1.14).

Conclusion: Our study found associations between genetic predisposition to higher BMD, a proxy for long-term estrogen exposure, and risk of developing endometroid and high-grade serous EOC cancers. These findings add to existing evidence of the relationship between estrogen and increased risk of EOC for certain histotypes.