Cancer Causes & Control最新文献

We examined the association between body mass index (BMI) and guideline-concordant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization among cancer survivors while considering the role of sociodemographic characteristics using a representative sample of the United States. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing data from the 2022 and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our outcome of interest was guideline-concordant CRC screening utilization and our exposure of interest was BMI. We performed weighted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the mentioned associations. Among 44,244 eligible cancer survivors, those who were overweight (84%) had the greatest CRC screening use, followed by those who were obese (81.3%), and underweight/normal weight (79.2%; p values < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed those who were overweight or obese compared to underweight/normal weight had 1.2-1.3-fold increased odds of having guideline-concordant CRC screening (overweight: OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.09-1.49; obese: OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.39). Our subpopulation analyses within the levels of BMI showed that females who were overweight (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.00) and non-Hispanic other (NHO) survivors who were underweight/normal weight (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.91) were 17%-53% less likely to be screened for CRC. Our findings indicate that BMI was positively associated with guideline-concordant CRC screening use among cancer survivors. However, female survivors who were obese and NHO survivors who were underweight/normal weight were less likely to be screened for CRC. Cancer survivorship care that integrates weight management and specific sociodemographic characteristics has potential for improving CRC screening adherence.

Purpose: Although sociodemographic factors such as socioeconomic status (SES), travel time to health care, cohabitation status, and region of residence are observed to influence incidence and survival for several types of cancers, it is unclear whether similar effects have been observed in patients with glioma. This study investigates whether these factors affect survival for glioma patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, the Swedish National Quality Registry for Brain Tumors was used to identify 1,276 patients with glioma WHO grade I-IV for whom data were deposited between 2009 and 2013. The RISK North database, which links data from the National Cancer Quality Register with citizen demographic data from the Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies (LISA), the Total Population Registry (TPR), and the Geography Database (GD), was utilized to assess survival in patients with glioma in relation to education level, cohabitation status, travel time to regional hospitals, and region of residence.

Results: In the multivariable analysis, longer survival was observed among WHO grade III-IV glioma patients with higher education level (middle school (ref) HR: 1, high school HR: 0.81 CI [0.67-0.98], p = 0.033; university/college HR: 0.81 CI [0.66-1.00], p = 0.048). Survival was not associated with travel time, cohabitation status, or region of residence in the multivariable survival analysis.

Conclusion: Low education level was associated with reduced survival for patients with glioma WHO grade III and IV in multivariable survival analyses, but no differences in survival were found in relation to travel time, cohabitation status, or region of residence.

Purpose: Rare cancers are defined as those for which there are less than 15 cases per 100,000 in the population annually. While much progress in detection and treatment has been made over the past decade for many rare cancers, less progress has been made in understanding survivorship needs. The objective of this study was to characterize the National Institutes of Health (NIH) cancer survivorship grant portfolio focused on rare cancers and to identify gaps specific to this area of science.

Methods: Newly awarded grants focused on rare cancers in the NIH cancer survivorship research portfolio from Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 to FY2023 were identified. Grant characteristics were abstracted and described. In addition, the number of grants for each rare cancer type was mapped to current Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program incidence and relative survival rates.

Results: A total of 93 survivorship grants focused on one or multiple rare cancer types were funded from FY2017 to FY2023. Approximately 85% of these grants investigated one of four cancer types: leukemia, head & neck, ovarian and brain. Few grants focused on other rare cancer types, such as multiple myeloma (n = 5), testicular cancer (n = 3), rectal cancer (n = 1), thyroid cancer (n = 1), and cervical cancer (n = 0). About half of the grants (50.5%) were observational studies; 34.4% focused explicitly on pediatric cancer survivors.

Conclusions: Survivorship research for many rare cancer types is limited. This paucity of research is a barrier to the identification of survivorship needs and the development of interventions to address these needs.

Purpose:  Older Black women and women living in areas of low socioeconomic status (SES) diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC) have worse overall survival (OS). The objective was to investigate associations between OS and race/ethnicity and sociodemographic factors in younger (21-64 years) and older women (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with CC using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data.

Methods:  This retrospective, population-based cohort study included 39,000 women ≥ 21 years diagnosed with CC diagnosed between 2006 and 2020. Age-group stratified Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, diagnosis year, and histology examined sociodemographic (rurality, SES, and persistent poverty) differences in OS.

Results:  In the sample, 82.8% were < 65 years. Compared to younger women, older women were more likely to be non-Latinx (NL) Black (16.0 vs 12.9%) and diagnosed with late-stage CC (67.9 vs 47.5%). Adjusted models suggested younger NL Black women had worse OS than their NL White counterparts (HR 1.45 [95% CI 1.37-1.54]), this association was not found among older NL Black women (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.96-1.16]). Similarly, younger women in lowest SES areas had worse OS compared to women in highest SES areas (HR 1.82 [95% CI 1.69-1.96]), this association was attenuated in older women (HR 1.27 [95% CI 1.15-1.42]). Finally, younger women living in persistent poverty had worse OS compared to those who did not (HR 1.40 [95% CI 1.32-1.48]), this association was not found in older women (HR 1.10 [95% CI 0.99-1.21]).

Conclusion: Sociodemographic disparities were found in CC OS for women < 65 that were attenuated or nonexistent in women ≥ 65 years.

Purpose: The prevalence of obesity, a crucial risk factor for breast cancer, is markedly higher among Hispanic women. The interaction between ethnic enclaves and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) as a determinant of this disparity warrants further research. We aimed to identify neighborhood profiles based on ethnic enclaves and socioeconomic status to evaluate the association with obesity among Hispanic women in the metropolitan Chicago region.

Methods: We used a convenience sample of 24,884 Hispanic women over age 40 who obtained breast imaging from the largest healthcare organization in Chicago between 2010 and 2017. We conducted LPA to characterize neighborhood composition based on tract indicators of ethnic enclaves, disadvantage, and affluence. Multivariate linear and multinomial logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of neighborhood profiles with BMI.

Results: The LPA model identified four latent profiles, labeled based on their most significant characteristic as "middling," "disadvantage" "ethnic enclaves," and "affluent". Close to 50% of women in the disadvantage profile were obese and obese class II. Women in the disadvantage profile had the highest relative risk of being obese II (OR: 2.74 CI 95% 2.23, 3.36), compared to women in the middling profile. Women in the ethnic enclave and affluent profile were positively and negatively associated with obesity, respectively.

Discussion: Using LPA to group individuals according to their combined traits provides empirical evidence to strengthen our understanding of how neighborhoods influence obesity in Hispanic women. The study findings suggest that ethnic enclaves, that are also disadvantage, are associated with obesity in Hispanic women.

Purpose: There is a consistent relationship with greater ovulation frequency and increased risk of ovarian cancer. However, prior research on infertility, which may be associated with ovulation frequency through multiple mechanisms, and ovarian cancer has yielded conflicting results, possibly due to prior research conflating fertility treatment with infertility and restricting follow-up to premenopausal cases. Our objective was to determine the association between infertility and risk of postmenopausal ovarian cancer, overall and by histotype, in a population that had not received treatment with IVF.

Methods: We utilized data from the Women's Health Initiative (n = 112,925 postmenopausal participants) with over 25 years of follow-up. At baseline, participants were asked whether they had ever tried to become pregnant for more than one year without becoming pregnant and whether a reason was found. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of incident adjudicated ovarian cancer comparing participants with a history of infertility to fertile participants overall and by histotype.

Results: 17% of participants reported a history of infertility at baseline and 1,109 ovarian cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up. No statistically significant association was observed between infertility and risk of any ovarian cancer (HR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.92-1.29), but those reporting infertility had a 90% higher risk of endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancers (HR: 1.90 95% CI 1.09-3.34) compared to fertile participants. The reported reason(s) for infertility had no discernable impact on these associations.

Conclusions: Infertility may be associated with clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancer but not other ovarian tumor histotypes.

Purpose: Disparities in gynecologic cancer clinical trial enrollment exist between Black and White patients; however, few examine racial differences in clinical trial enrollment predictors. We examined whether first-line clinical trial enrollment determinants differed between Black and White gynecologic cancer patients.

Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify Black and White gynecologic cancer (cervix, ovarian, uterine) patients diagnosed in 2014-2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between clinical trial enrollment (yes vs no) and sociodemographic, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics stratified by race. We included a multiplicative interaction term between each assessed predictor and race to test whether associations differed by race.

Results: We included 703,022 gynecologic cancer patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.9 [13.1] years). Clinical trial enrollment was lower among Black (49/86,058, 0.06%) vs. White patients (710/616,964, 0.11%). Only cancer site differed by race: among Black patients, a cervical vs. uterine cancer diagnosis (OR = 4.63, 95% CI = 1.67-12.88) was associated with higher clinical trial enrollment odds, while among White patients, both cervical (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.48-3.29) and ovarian (OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.58-4.47) cancer diagnoses (vs. uterine cancer) were associated with higher enrollment odds. Most predictors were associated with clinical trial enrollment odds among White but not Black patients.

Conclusion: Few differences in first-line clinical trial enrollment predictors exist between Black and White gynecologic cancer patients. Although small numbers of Black patients and low clinical trial prevalence are limitations, this descriptive analysis is important in understanding racially disparate clinical trial enrollment.

Introduction: Gallbladder adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic subtype of gallbladder malignancies. In contrast, gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and poorly studied. This study aims to identify the demographic variables that may be associated with each histologic subtype.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 53,447 patients diagnosed with gallbladder neoplasms using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2011 and 2020. Associations between demographic variables and the incidence of gallbladder adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma were compared using chi-square tests and post hoc analyses.

Results: A total of 51,694 (96.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma, and 1753 (3.3%) had neuroendocrine histologic subtypes. The comparative analysis revealed significant associations with age, gender, and race (p < 0.05). Neuroendocrine carcinoma patients were diagnosed at a younger age compared to those with adenocarcinoma (z = 14.7). Moreover, patients with privately managed insurance had a higher likelihood of neuroendocrine carcinoma (z = 5.7), while those with Medicare were less likely (z = - 4.7). Gender differences were also notable; males were more predisposed to neuroendocrine carcinoma (z = 4.4, OR = 1.3), while females were less so (z = - 3.1). A significant increase in neuroendocrine cases was observed after 2016 (z = 2.4), while the incidence of adenocarcinoma subtypes was stable. Notable racial disparities in the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer were identified with black patients more likely to have neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Conclusion: This study highlights the differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinomas compared to adenocarcinoma tumors. These findings highlight potential opportunities for targeted screening programs to enhance early detection efforts.

Purpose: Oncological treatments, such as radiotherapy, which requires consistent electricity, the presence of specialized clinical teams, and daily patient access to treatment facilities, are frequently disrupted by extreme weather events, posing several health hazards to patients. This study explores the association between declared wildfire disasters during radiotherapy and overall survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: The study population consisted of 202,935 adults with inoperable Stage III NSCLC, who initiated radiotherapy from 2004 through 2019. Exposure was defined as a wildfire disaster declaration in the county of the treatment facility within 12 weeks of initiating radiotherapy. Overall survival was defined as the interval (months) between age at diagnosis and age at death, date of last contact, or study end. Cox proportional hazards was used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals with inverse probability weighting.

Results: Patients exposed to a wildfire disaster declaration during radiation treatment had worse overall survival (HR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.06; p = 0.02), compared to unexposed patients in adjusted models.

Conclusion: Exposure to a wildfire disaster during radiotherapy is associated with worse overall survival among patients with stage III non-operable NSCLC. This finding underscores the critical need for developing adaptation strategies within the healthcare sector, especially in oncology.

Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the seventh most common cancer among Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders (ANHPIs), yet the risk of death in specific ANHPI subgroups in the US is unknown.

Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to investigate relative survival and the risk of death among NHL patients in ANHPI subgroups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing ANHPI subgroups to non-Hispanic White (NHW) NHL patients for all-cause death and NHL-specific death. Prognostic factors were further estimated within each ANHPI subgroup.

Results: We identified 4,513 East Asian, 4,034 Southeast Asian, 1,052 South Asian, 674 Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI), and 116,922 NHW patients with NHL. Compared to NHW patients, East Asian, Southeast Asian, and NHPI patients had a lower 5-year relative survival. The risk of 5-year all-cause death was 1.10-fold higher for East Asian patients (95% CI 1.04, 1.15), 1.34-fold higher for Southeast Asian patients (95% CI 1.27, 1.41), and 1.62-fold higher for NHPI patients (95% CI 1.43, 1.83) compared to NHW patients. Potential prognostic factors among ANHPI NHL patients included older age at cancer diagnosis, non-married status, advanced cancer stage, and a diagnosis of DLBCL or T-cell lymphoma.

Conclusion: Our study revealed significant disparities in survival among ANHPI patients with NHL, particularly among East Asian, Southeast Asian, and NHPI patients. Addressing these disparities calls for the implementation of preventive strategies and interventions tailored specifically to ANHPI subgroups. Further studies are imperative to explore adverse health outcomes within these ANHPI subgroups.