Cancer Causes & Control最新文献

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) incidence is increasing in US women under 40, with variation across racial and ethnic groups. It is not yet known if incidence trends also vary by geography within the USA, which may inform whether place-based exposures contribute to BC risk in younger women.

Methods: Using the US Cancer Statistics database, we analyzed age-adjusted BC incidence rates from 2001 to 2020 in women aged 25-39. We calculated the average annual percent change (AAPC) using Joinpoint regression and performed age-period-cohort analyses.

Results: From 2001 to 2020, BC incidence in women under 40 increased by more than 0.50% per year in 21 states, while remaining stable or decreasing in the other states. Incidence was 32% higher in the five states with the highest rates compared to the five states with the lowest rates. The Western region had the highest rate of increase (AAPC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-0.96), despite having the lowest absolute incidence rate from 2001 to 2020. The Northeast had the highest absolute rate of BC among women under 40 and experienced a significant increase over time (AAPC = 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.82). The South was the only region where BC under 40 did not increase from 2001 to 2020.

Conclusion: These findings support that BC incidence trends in US women under 40 vary by geography, and the range of state-specific risks was comparable in magnitude to other risk measures, such as polygenic risk scores. This suggest that incorporating place-based factors alongside established risk factors into risk prediction may improve our ability to identify groups of younger women at higher risk for early-onset BC.

Purpose: Urbanization has emerged as one of the main determinants of the rising breast cancer incidence in Asia, but understanding the link is hindered by the lack of population-based prospective cohorts, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Given that mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors and that it is associated with known lifestyle and reproductive factors, we explored using MD to delineate factors associated with differences in breast cancer risk between women living in urban and rural areas.

Methods: Using data from a cross-sectional study of 9,417 women living in urban or rural areas recruited through hospital- or community-based opportunistic mammography screening programs, we conducted regression and mediation analyses to identify factors contributing to the differences in MD between urban and rural populations across Asian ethnic subgroups.

Results: Consistent with higher risk of breast cancer, age-and-BMI-adjusted percent and absolute MD measurements were significantly higher in women living in urban areas compared to those in rural areas. Mediation analyses showed that differences observed were partly explained by higher parity (7-9%) and breastfeeding (2-3%) among women living in rural areas. Notably, the effect of parity (number of children) was similar in Chinese and Malay women (16-17% and 7-8%, respectively), but not observed in Indian women. Hormonal use, smoking, and physical activity did not predict MD nor mediate the observed association.

Conclusion: Higher MD among women living in urban compared to rural areas is partially attributable to parity and breastfeeding practices, a significant proportion of attributable risk remains unknown.

Purpose: Cancer-related genes and pathways have recently been implicated in a genome-wide meta-analysis of head size. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the association between adult head circumference and the risk of cancer.

Methods: This is a cohort study using data from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study, where 1,301 participants aged 27-96 years with head circumference measured between 2015 and 2019, and without a history of cancer, were followed up to 15 January 2024. Incident cancers were identified using electronic medical records from a territory-wide database. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for age, sex, height, weight, education, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, and family history of cancer, as well as accounting for familial clustering.

Results: The median head circumference was 53 cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-54) and 54 cm (IQR: 53-55) for women and men, respectively. During a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 66 individuals were diagnosed with cancer. In the adjusted model, a larger head circumference was associated with an increased risk of any cancer (HR per cm increase: 1.17; 95% CI 1.00-1.36). Results remained similar when adjusting for waist-to-hip ratio instead of weight or when additionally adjusting for serum calcium and phosphorus levels. When stratified by cancer sites, head circumference was most strongly associated with colorectal cancer (HR per cm increase: 1.81; 95% CI 1.14-2.90) and prostate cancer (HR per cm increase: 1.58; 95% CI 1.16-2.16).

Conclusion: Head circumference is positively associated with the risk of cancer independently of height, weight, and other cancer risk factors.

Introduction: Gallbladder adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic subtype of gallbladder malignancies. In contrast, gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and poorly studied. This study aims to identify the demographic variables that may be associated with each histologic subtype.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 53,447 patients diagnosed with gallbladder neoplasms using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2011 and 2020. Associations between demographic variables and the incidence of gallbladder adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma were compared using chi-square tests and post hoc analyses.

Results: A total of 51,694 (96.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma, and 1753 (3.3%) had neuroendocrine histologic subtypes. The comparative analysis revealed significant associations with age, gender, and race (p < 0.05). Neuroendocrine carcinoma patients were diagnosed at a younger age compared to those with adenocarcinoma (z = 14.7). Moreover, patients with privately managed insurance had a higher likelihood of neuroendocrine carcinoma (z = 5.7), while those with Medicare were less likely (z = - 4.7). Gender differences were also notable; males were more predisposed to neuroendocrine carcinoma (z = 4.4, OR = 1.3), while females were less so (z = - 3.1). A significant increase in neuroendocrine cases was observed after 2016 (z = 2.4), while the incidence of adenocarcinoma subtypes was stable. Notable racial disparities in the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer were identified with black patients more likely to have neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Conclusion: This study highlights the differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinomas compared to adenocarcinoma tumors. These findings highlight potential opportunities for targeted screening programs to enhance early detection efforts.

Purpose: Disparities in gynecologic cancer clinical trial enrollment exist between Black and White patients; however, few examine racial differences in clinical trial enrollment predictors. We examined whether first-line clinical trial enrollment determinants differed between Black and White gynecologic cancer patients.

Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify Black and White gynecologic cancer (cervix, ovarian, uterine) patients diagnosed in 2014-2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between clinical trial enrollment (yes vs no) and sociodemographic, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics stratified by race. We included a multiplicative interaction term between each assessed predictor and race to test whether associations differed by race.

Results: We included 703,022 gynecologic cancer patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.9 [13.1] years). Clinical trial enrollment was lower among Black (49/86,058, 0.06%) vs. White patients (710/616,964, 0.11%). Only cancer site differed by race: among Black patients, a cervical vs. uterine cancer diagnosis (OR = 4.63, 95% CI = 1.67-12.88) was associated with higher clinical trial enrollment odds, while among White patients, both cervical (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.48-3.29) and ovarian (OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.58-4.47) cancer diagnoses (vs. uterine cancer) were associated with higher enrollment odds. Most predictors were associated with clinical trial enrollment odds among White but not Black patients.

Conclusion: Few differences in first-line clinical trial enrollment predictors exist between Black and White gynecologic cancer patients. Although small numbers of Black patients and low clinical trial prevalence are limitations, this descriptive analysis is important in understanding racially disparate clinical trial enrollment.

Purpose: Few studies have examined whether the incidence rates of invasive breast cancer among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) populations differ by the neighborhood social environment. Thus, we examined associations of ethnic enclave and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) with breast cancer incidence rates among AANHPI females in California.

Methods: A total of 14,738 AANHPI females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2008-2012 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. AANHPI ethnic enclaves (culturally distinct neighborhoods) and nSES were assessed at the census tract level using 2007-2011 American Community Survey data. Breast cancer age-adjusted incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for AANHPI ethnic enclave, nSES, and their joint effects. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stage of disease.

Results: The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in lowest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (quintile (Q)1) were 1.21 times (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.11, 1.32) that of AANHPI females living highest ethnic enclave neighborhoods (Q5). In addition, AANHPI females living in highest vs. lowest SES neighborhoods had higher incidence rates of breast cancer (Q5 vs. Q1 IRR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.40). The incidence rate of breast cancer among AANHPI females living in low ethnic enclave + high SES neighborhoods was 1.32 times (95% CI 1.25, 1.39) that of AANHPI females living in high ethnic enclave + low SES neighborhoods. Similar patterns of associations were observed for localized and advanced stage disease.

Conclusion: For AANHPI females in California, incidence rates of breast cancer differed by nSES, ethnic enclave, when considered independently and jointly. Future studies should examine whether the impact of these neighborhood-level factors on breast cancer incidence rates differ across specific AANHPI ethnic groups and investigate the pathways through which they contribute to breast cancer incidence.

Purpose: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) individuals experience disparities in cancer screening. We examined whether experience of LGBTQ+ -related discrimination in medical settings was associated with cancer screening disparities.

Methods: Participants were recruited via social media for a cross-sectional survey study. Those who self-reported as LGBTQ+ , being 40+ years of age, and residing in the US were eligible. Participants reported their clinical and demographic characteristics, cancer screening history, and experiences of discrimination in a medical setting. We examined the odds (OR) of ever undergoing cancer screening by experienced discrimination, stratified by sex assigned at birth.

Results: Participants (n = 310) were on average 54.4 ± 9.0 years old and primarily White (92.9%). Most identified as lesbian (38.1%) or gay (40.0%) while 17.1% were transgender or gender diverse. Nearly half (45.5%) reported experiencing LGBTQ+ -related discrimination in the medical setting. Participants assigned female at birth with discriminatory experiences had significantly lower odds of ever undergoing colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy compared to those without discriminatory experiences (OR: 0.37; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.15-0.90). No significant differences in colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy uptake were observed in those assigned male at birth by discriminatory experiences (OR: 2.02; 95% CI 0.59-6.91). Pap tests, mammogram, and stool colorectal cancer screening did not differ by discriminatory experience.

Conclusion: Discrimination in medical settings was commonly reported by LGBTQ+ individuals in this study. When treating LGBTQ+ patients, clinicians should ask about prior experiences and continue to promote cancer screening. Future studies should examine discrimination as a key driver of LGBTQ+ disparities in cancer screening.

Purpose: Smoking after cancer impairs cancer treatment outcomes and prognosis, regardless of cancer type. Prior data suggest that patients with cancers other than lung or head/neck cancer had lower cessation motivation, which in turn predicted lower smoking abstinence. This study evaluated feasibility for a future efficacy trial and assessed the acceptability of brief self-help materials, targeted by cancer type, to enhance cessation motivation.

Methods: Patients had a diagnosis of skin melanoma, breast, bladder, colorectal, or gynecological cancers within ≤ 6 months, smoked ≥ 1 cigarette in the past month, and were not currently participating in a cessation program. After completing a baseline assessment, participants received the booklet corresponding to their cancer type. Follow-ups were conducted 1 week and 1 month post-intervention.

Results: Among 118 patients potentially eligible, 109 were successfully contacted and 53 patients were eligible and all consented. Among consenting patients, 92.5% completed baseline, and 90.6% received the intervention. Among patients receiving the intervention, 91.7% completed all study procedures and follow-up. At 1 month, 87.5% reported reading the booklet and 92.8% rated it as good/excellent. Motivation to quit smoking increased over time among those with lower motivation at baseline, 33.3% sought smoking cessation assistance, and 25.0% were smoke-free 1 month post-intervention.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the first intervention developed for patients with cancers not typically associated with smoking. This low-cost and easy to disseminate intervention has potential to increase motivation to quit smoking among patients with cancers not typically perceived as smoking-related.

Purpose: Social support has been linked to increased use of preventive care services. Living arrangements and residential stability may be important structural sources of social support, but few studies have examined their impact on cancer screening.

Methods: Data were from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Participants were classified as up-to-date or not with female breast cancer (BC), cervical cancer (CVC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between screening and residential stability (< 1 year, 1-3 years, 4-10 years, 11-20 years, or > 20 years), living arrangement (with spouse/partner only, children only, both, or neither), and perceived social support (rarely/never, sometimes, usually, or always available), overall and stratified by sex (CRC) and age group (CVC).

Results: The adjusted odds of BC (odds ratio [OR]  0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) and CVC (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96) screening were lowest for those who reported never/rarely vs. always having social support. The adjusted odds of BC (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70) and CRC (OR_FEMALE = 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.68; OR_MALE = 1.61, 95% CI 1.35-1.90) screening were higher for those living with a spouse/partner only vs. those living with neither spouse/partner nor children. Less residential stability was associated with increased CVC screening among females 21-34 years of age, but not BC or CRC screening.

Conclusions: Social support measures were associated with screening to varying degrees by site and age, but higher perceived social support and living with a spouse/partner only demonstrated a consistent positive association. Interventions that mobilize social support networks and address the unmet social needs of parents/caregivers may improve cancer control.

Purpose: Randomized clinical trials support reductions in contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk with use of adjuvant endocrine therapy, however, real-world treatment effects, particularly for subgroups of breast cancer survivors, remain inconclusive. To address this, population-based observational studies of adjuvant endocrine therapy and CBC were synthesized and meta-analyzed.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for observational studies of endocrine therapy use and CBC risk. Random effects meta-analyses estimated summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between endocrine therapy (ever use of tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors (AIs)) and CBC risk. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I² test. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design, menopausal status, and CBC estrogen receptor (ER)-status.

Results: Seventeen eligible observational studies (n = 287,576 breast cancer survivors) published between 1995 and 2019 were included. Endocrine therapy use was associated with reduced CBC risk (RR:0.62, 95% CI:0.53, 0.73, I² = 84.8%, p < 0.0001). No heterogeneity was observed by study design (p_het = 0.9). Similar reductions were observed in analyses restricted to tamoxifen use. As only two studies assessed AI use, estimates could not be meta-analyzed. In subgroup analyses, there were no differences in CBC risk reduction by menopausal status (p_het = 0.22). Endocrine therapy reduced risk of ER-positive (RR:0.55, 95% CI:0.43, 0.70) but not ER-negative CBC (RR:1.26, 95% CI:0.95, 1.66) (p_het < 0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis of observational studies supports a reduction in CBC risk with endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors, in concert with evidence synthesized from randomized clinical trials, and highlights differences in endocrine therapy effectiveness by ER-status of CBC.