Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00115-7
Daniel Jesuwenu Ajose, Abimbola Olumide Adekanmbi, Nor Fadhilah Kamaruzzaman, Collins Njie Ateba, Shamsaldeen Ibrahim Saeed
One of the most significant medical advancements of the 20th century was the discovery of antibiotics, which continue to play a vital tool in the treatment and prevention of diseases in humans and animals. However, the imprudent use of antibiotics in all fields of One-Health and concerns about antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens have raised interest in antibiotic use restrictions on a global scale. Despite the failure of conventional antimicrobial agents, only about 15 new antibiotics have been introduced clinically since year 2000 to date. Moreover, there has been reports of resistance to some of these new antibiotics. This has necessitated a need to search for alternative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Thus, this review compiles and evaluates the approaches-natural compounds, phage treatment, and nanomaterials-that are being used and/or suggested as the potential substitutes for conventional antibiotics.
{"title":"Combating antibiotic resistance in a one health context: a plethora of frontiers.","authors":"Daniel Jesuwenu Ajose, Abimbola Olumide Adekanmbi, Nor Fadhilah Kamaruzzaman, Collins Njie Ateba, Shamsaldeen Ibrahim Saeed","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00115-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00115-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most significant medical advancements of the 20th century was the discovery of antibiotics, which continue to play a vital tool in the treatment and prevention of diseases in humans and animals. However, the imprudent use of antibiotics in all fields of One-Health and concerns about antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens have raised interest in antibiotic use restrictions on a global scale. Despite the failure of conventional antimicrobial agents, only about 15 new antibiotics have been introduced clinically since year 2000 to date. Moreover, there has been reports of resistance to some of these new antibiotics. This has necessitated a need to search for alternative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Thus, this review compiles and evaluates the approaches-natural compounds, phage treatment, and nanomaterials-that are being used and/or suggested as the potential substitutes for conventional antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531134/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Bangladesh has reported > 560 H5N1 outbreaks in poultry and eight human cases since 2007. Commercial chicken farms were mostly affected. Commercial chicken farms across the country use imported vaccines against H5N1 virus; however, these vaccines did not use local circulatory isolates of H5N1virus. Vaccination may have limited effectiveness in chicken because of the mismatch in terms of subtypes and clades. To test this, we conducted a mixed-method study to assess the impact of ongoing vaccination against H5N1 virus on H5N1 viral shedding through freshly dropped feces of chickens raised in commercial farms that exclusively vaccinated or did not vaccinate their chickens.
Methods: Initially, we collected vaccination coverage data from all active farms in a subdistrict of each of eight division. In each district, 25 vaccinated and 25 non-vaccinated chicken farms were selected randomly for sample collection. All samples were tested to detect avian influenza viruses using rRT-PCR.
Results: A total of 5092 poultry farms were surveyed; among them 1284 (25%) chicken farms administered vaccine against H5N1 virus. In total 21 of 400 tested farms (5%) had chicken feces samples that tested positive for AIVs; of these three were positive for H5N1 subtype of clade 2.3.2.1. Out of three H5N1 positive farms, 1 (33%) was vaccinated and 2 (67%) were unvaccinated. The chicken farms that administered vaccine against H5N1 was found protective for the detection of H5N1 viral RNA (aOR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.48). The H5N1 isolates of clade 2.3.2.1 sequenced in this study formed a cluster with the vaccine strain A/duck/Guangdong/S1322/2010 (H5N1) [Re-6].
Conclusions: The overall low vaccination coverage with low detection of H5N1 virus in commercial chickens makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the vaccine in reducing H5N1 viral shedding.
{"title":"Low detection of H5N1 virus in commercial chickens with a low-level of vaccination coverage against H5N1 virus infection in Bangladesh.","authors":"Sukanta Chowdhury, Mohammad Enayet Hossain, Rashedul Hasan, Mojnu Miah, Sajal Kanti Biswas, Md Mahmudul Hasan, Probir Kumar Ghosh, Jenifar Quaiyum Ami, Akash Saha, Sumon Ghosh, Mahmudur Rahman, Fahmida Chowdhury, Mohammed Ziaur Rahman","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00119-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00119-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bangladesh has reported > 560 H5N1 outbreaks in poultry and eight human cases since 2007. Commercial chicken farms were mostly affected. Commercial chicken farms across the country use imported vaccines against H5N1 virus; however, these vaccines did not use local circulatory isolates of H5N1virus. Vaccination may have limited effectiveness in chicken because of the mismatch in terms of subtypes and clades. To test this, we conducted a mixed-method study to assess the impact of ongoing vaccination against H5N1 virus on H5N1 viral shedding through freshly dropped feces of chickens raised in commercial farms that exclusively vaccinated or did not vaccinate their chickens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially, we collected vaccination coverage data from all active farms in a subdistrict of each of eight division. In each district, 25 vaccinated and 25 non-vaccinated chicken farms were selected randomly for sample collection. All samples were tested to detect avian influenza viruses using rRT-PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5092 poultry farms were surveyed; among them 1284 (25%) chicken farms administered vaccine against H5N1 virus. In total 21 of 400 tested farms (5%) had chicken feces samples that tested positive for AIVs; of these three were positive for H5N1 subtype of clade 2.3.2.1. Out of three H5N1 positive farms, 1 (33%) was vaccinated and 2 (67%) were unvaccinated. The chicken farms that administered vaccine against H5N1 was found protective for the detection of H5N1 viral RNA (aOR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.48). The H5N1 isolates of clade 2.3.2.1 sequenced in this study formed a cluster with the vaccine strain A/duck/Guangdong/S1322/2010 (H5N1) [Re-6].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall low vaccination coverage with low detection of H5N1 virus in commercial chickens makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the vaccine in reducing H5N1 viral shedding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529421/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142559988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00114-8
Claudia Robbiati, Alessia Milano, Silvia Declich, Maria Grazia Dente
Introduction: Multifactorial determinants of vector presence, distribution and ability of transmitting diseases, demand holistic approaches that consider eco-biosocial factors, such as One Health (OH), and engage institutions and communities to reduce vulnerability to vector-borne diseases (VBDs). Although the importance of multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup collaboration for prevention and preparedness to VBDs has been promoted by international guidance, evidence about practical experiences adopting a OH approach needs to be gathered and enabling factors for a successful governance highlighted.
Methods: This study included a rapid literature review coupled with a stakeholder consultation process.
Results: The peer-reviewed literature search identified 1674 articles and 13 articles were finally included in the review. The collaboration and coordination of different sectors and stakeholders allowed to focus resources, and share knowledge and perspectives. To support coordination and collaboration among the stakeholders synergistic interaction mechanisms were created, such as working groups and committees, and connection agents emerged as the main link between institution and communities. These synergies allowed to target the multidimensional drivers of VBDs, supported transversal capacity building and an holistic monitoring evaluation framework, and improved effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions.
Conclusion: A OH model highlighting enabling factors for multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup interventions for VBDs prevention and preparedness was developed to support decision-makers and key stakeholders to deal with a OH governance.
{"title":"One Health prevention and preparedness to vector-borne diseases: how should we deal with a multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup governance?","authors":"Claudia Robbiati, Alessia Milano, Silvia Declich, Maria Grazia Dente","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00114-8","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00114-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multifactorial determinants of vector presence, distribution and ability of transmitting diseases, demand holistic approaches that consider eco-biosocial factors, such as One Health (OH), and engage institutions and communities to reduce vulnerability to vector-borne diseases (VBDs). Although the importance of multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup collaboration for prevention and preparedness to VBDs has been promoted by international guidance, evidence about practical experiences adopting a OH approach needs to be gathered and enabling factors for a successful governance highlighted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included a rapid literature review coupled with a stakeholder consultation process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peer-reviewed literature search identified 1674 articles and 13 articles were finally included in the review. The collaboration and coordination of different sectors and stakeholders allowed to focus resources, and share knowledge and perspectives. To support coordination and collaboration among the stakeholders synergistic interaction mechanisms were created, such as working groups and committees, and connection agents emerged as the main link between institution and communities. These synergies allowed to target the multidimensional drivers of VBDs, supported transversal capacity building and an holistic monitoring evaluation framework, and improved effectiveness and sustainability of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A OH model highlighting enabling factors for multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup interventions for VBDs prevention and preparedness was developed to support decision-makers and key stakeholders to deal with a OH governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142559989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00116-6
Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Pamela Burger, Johannes Lorenz Khol, Annika Posautz, Eva Schernhammer, Ruth Kutalek, Gavrila Amadea Puspitarani, Lia Schlippe Justicia, David Niklas Springer, Damien Ernst, Cynthia Sohm, Anna Pontel de Almeida, Hermann Schobesberger, Sascha Knauf, Chris Walzer
In the post-COVID-19 era, stakeholders, including policymakers, funders, and the public, are increasingly seeking for a cross-sectoral systems-based approach to health risks extending beyond conventional measures. Anchored on three health pillars -human, animal, and environmental- One Health offers a promising framework to effectively address this demand. While some nations have already implemented national One Health strategic plans, European countries, in general, are lagging behind the global agenda. On 22 February 2024, an initiative was launched in Austria toward addressing this gap, bringing together multiple sectors and disciplines, marking the initial step in creating a national One Health network. The workshop emphasized the importance of enhancing One Health education and addressed key topics, such as incorporating the environmental pillar of One Health as well as socio-economic and cultural drivers to further our understanding of outbreaks, and establishing trusted communication channels, including data sharing, between disciplines and sectors. Identified challenges encompassed the need for more funding of transdisciplinary research. Opportunities for advancement include initiating local One Health projects and showcasing their positive impacts. Moving forward, efforts will focus on establishing a mature and globally connected One Health framework in Austria and supporting the integration of One Health aspects into education curricula, research programs, and policies.
{"title":"Launching Austria's One Health network: paving the way for transdisciplinary collaborations.","authors":"Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Pamela Burger, Johannes Lorenz Khol, Annika Posautz, Eva Schernhammer, Ruth Kutalek, Gavrila Amadea Puspitarani, Lia Schlippe Justicia, David Niklas Springer, Damien Ernst, Cynthia Sohm, Anna Pontel de Almeida, Hermann Schobesberger, Sascha Knauf, Chris Walzer","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00116-6","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00116-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the post-COVID-19 era, stakeholders, including policymakers, funders, and the public, are increasingly seeking for a cross-sectoral systems-based approach to health risks extending beyond conventional measures. Anchored on three health pillars -human, animal, and environmental- One Health offers a promising framework to effectively address this demand. While some nations have already implemented national One Health strategic plans, European countries, in general, are lagging behind the global agenda. On 22 February 2024, an initiative was launched in Austria toward addressing this gap, bringing together multiple sectors and disciplines, marking the initial step in creating a national One Health network. The workshop emphasized the importance of enhancing One Health education and addressed key topics, such as incorporating the environmental pillar of One Health as well as socio-economic and cultural drivers to further our understanding of outbreaks, and establishing trusted communication channels, including data sharing, between disciplines and sectors. Identified challenges encompassed the need for more funding of transdisciplinary research. Opportunities for advancement include initiating local One Health projects and showcasing their positive impacts. Moving forward, efforts will focus on establishing a mature and globally connected One Health framework in Austria and supporting the integration of One Health aspects into education curricula, research programs, and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), a tick-borne disease caused by Dabie bandavirus (SFTSV) is an emerging infectious disease of substantial concern in East Asia. In 2019, Ongkittikul S et al. reported the first case of SFTS in Thailand. Our report describes a One Health investigation of SFTS zoonosis examining the index case and suspected animal reservoirs using real-time RT-PCR and immunoassays. We add to the report on the first confirmed case of SFTSV infection in a human in Thailand by conducting a limited but informative One Health surveillance study. Dogs and cats tested positive for SFTSV antibody using IgG ELISA. We conclude that domestic dogs and cats might serve as potential reservoirs for SFTSV spread due to their closer proximity to the index case than other non-domestic animals. Notably, we did not detect SFTSV in synanthropic cats or dogs-nor did we detect SFTSV in Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks-using RT-PCR. We propose that One Health investigations coupling genomic and serologic assays in response to new SFTS cases could play a pivotal role in preventing and managing SFTS among humans and animals in East Asia. As such, we are establishing a collaborative response to SFTS in Thailand through human outbreak investigations that align with principles of One Health, through environmental surveys and animal RT-PCR and immunoassays. Our investigation highlights the importance of coupling RT-PCR with seroprevalence assays as principal elements of One Health surveillance for SFTS in order to shed light on potential animal reservoirs and track emerging zoonosis.
{"title":"Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in Thailand: using a one health approach to respond to novel zoonosis and its implications in clinical practice.","authors":"Chalo Sansilapin, Ratanaporn Tangwangvivat, Curtis S Hoffmann, Chanatip Chailek, Paisin Lekcharoen, Nattakarn Thippamom, Sininat Petcharat, Piyanan Taweethavonsawat, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee, Rome Buathong, Takeshi Kurosu, Tomoki Yoshikawa, Masayuki Shimojima, Sopon Iamsirithaworn, Opass Putcharoen","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00112-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00112-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), a tick-borne disease caused by Dabie bandavirus (SFTSV) is an emerging infectious disease of substantial concern in East Asia. In 2019, Ongkittikul S et al. reported the first case of SFTS in Thailand. Our report describes a One Health investigation of SFTS zoonosis examining the index case and suspected animal reservoirs using real-time RT-PCR and immunoassays. We add to the report on the first confirmed case of SFTSV infection in a human in Thailand by conducting a limited but informative One Health surveillance study. Dogs and cats tested positive for SFTSV antibody using IgG ELISA. We conclude that domestic dogs and cats might serve as potential reservoirs for SFTSV spread due to their closer proximity to the index case than other non-domestic animals. Notably, we did not detect SFTSV in synanthropic cats or dogs-nor did we detect SFTSV in Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks-using RT-PCR. We propose that One Health investigations coupling genomic and serologic assays in response to new SFTS cases could play a pivotal role in preventing and managing SFTS among humans and animals in East Asia. As such, we are establishing a collaborative response to SFTS in Thailand through human outbreak investigations that align with principles of One Health, through environmental surveys and animal RT-PCR and immunoassays. Our investigation highlights the importance of coupling RT-PCR with seroprevalence assays as principal elements of One Health surveillance for SFTS in order to shed light on potential animal reservoirs and track emerging zoonosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443680/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00113-9
Inocêncio Chongo, Almiro Tivane, Vanessa Monteiro, Osvaldo Inlamea, Plácida Maholela, Ilda Nhanombe, Saquibibi Ibraimo, John Oludele, Argentina Muianga, Virgílio António, Sádia Ali, Aline Gatambire, Grace Goryoka, Nadia Oussayef, Nick Schaad, Kate Varela, Fernando Rodrigues, Lourenço Mapaco, Sara Achá, Américo Conceição, Eduardo Samo Gudo
Introduction: Around 75% of (re)emerging infections are of zoonotic origins. The risk of zoonotic transmission in Mozambique is high because approximately 81% of the country's labor force is involved with agriculture, which represents a vulnerability for more frequent human-animal interaction and risk of spillover events. A One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization (OHZDP) workshop was conducted in Mozambique to facilitate coordination and collaboration within and across sectors to prevent, detect, and respond to zoonotic disease threats. Based on the success of this integrated workshop, the stakeholders developed actions whose results have a great impact on animal welfare, environment and improving public health.
Methods: In 2018, representatives from Mozambique's human, animal, and environmental sectors from government, universities, research institutions and partners used US CDC's OHZDP Process to prioritize endemic and emerging zoonotic diseases of greatest national concern and develop recommendations and key interventions needed to advance One Health in Mozambique. After the OHZDP workshop, the Mozambique One Health Secretariat used a theory of change methodology to identify activities for implementation from the recommendations of the OHZDP workshop. Since the OHZDP workshop, the Secretariat has monitored progress of activities annually.
Results: Mozambique's priority zoonotic diseases are rabies, zoonotic tuberculosis, salmonellosis, zoonotic avian influenza, trypanosomiasis, brucellosis, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. One Health recommendations and interventions to address the priority zoonotic diseases focused on One Health collaboration, communication, and coordination; laboratory; surveillance; preparedness and response; prevention; workforce development; and research. After the OHZDP workshop, Mozambique established One Health coordination mechanisms, developed training courses for surveillance, laboratory diagnosis, outbreak investigation, and preparedness and response for the priority zoonotic diseases, conducted joint research, and developed plans.
Conclusion: Prioritization of zoonotic diseases is critical as it facilitated the key One Health players in Mozambique to optimize resources, gain a greater understanding of zoonotic diseases, and implement policies and activities that promote multisectoral, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration across human, animal, and environmental sectors to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats. The success of these activities implemented by the local Government and One Health partners were built from the implementation and momentum from the Mozambique's OHZDP workshop.
{"title":"Outcomes from a Zoonotic Disease Prioritization workshop using One Health approach in Mozambique, 2018 to 2023.","authors":"Inocêncio Chongo, Almiro Tivane, Vanessa Monteiro, Osvaldo Inlamea, Plácida Maholela, Ilda Nhanombe, Saquibibi Ibraimo, John Oludele, Argentina Muianga, Virgílio António, Sádia Ali, Aline Gatambire, Grace Goryoka, Nadia Oussayef, Nick Schaad, Kate Varela, Fernando Rodrigues, Lourenço Mapaco, Sara Achá, Américo Conceição, Eduardo Samo Gudo","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00113-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00113-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Around 75% of (re)emerging infections are of zoonotic origins. The risk of zoonotic transmission in Mozambique is high because approximately 81% of the country's labor force is involved with agriculture, which represents a vulnerability for more frequent human-animal interaction and risk of spillover events. A One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization (OHZDP) workshop was conducted in Mozambique to facilitate coordination and collaboration within and across sectors to prevent, detect, and respond to zoonotic disease threats. Based on the success of this integrated workshop, the stakeholders developed actions whose results have a great impact on animal welfare, environment and improving public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2018, representatives from Mozambique's human, animal, and environmental sectors from government, universities, research institutions and partners used US CDC's OHZDP Process to prioritize endemic and emerging zoonotic diseases of greatest national concern and develop recommendations and key interventions needed to advance One Health in Mozambique. After the OHZDP workshop, the Mozambique One Health Secretariat used a theory of change methodology to identify activities for implementation from the recommendations of the OHZDP workshop. Since the OHZDP workshop, the Secretariat has monitored progress of activities annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mozambique's priority zoonotic diseases are rabies, zoonotic tuberculosis, salmonellosis, zoonotic avian influenza, trypanosomiasis, brucellosis, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. One Health recommendations and interventions to address the priority zoonotic diseases focused on One Health collaboration, communication, and coordination; laboratory; surveillance; preparedness and response; prevention; workforce development; and research. After the OHZDP workshop, Mozambique established One Health coordination mechanisms, developed training courses for surveillance, laboratory diagnosis, outbreak investigation, and preparedness and response for the priority zoonotic diseases, conducted joint research, and developed plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prioritization of zoonotic diseases is critical as it facilitated the key One Health players in Mozambique to optimize resources, gain a greater understanding of zoonotic diseases, and implement policies and activities that promote multisectoral, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary collaboration across human, animal, and environmental sectors to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats. The success of these activities implemented by the local Government and One Health partners were built from the implementation and momentum from the Mozambique's OHZDP workshop.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443713/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-11DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00108-6
Olalekan Chris Akinsulie, Oluwawemimo Oluseun Adebowale, Ridwan Olamilekan Adesola, Olamilekan Gabriel Banwo, Ibrahim Idris, Seto Charles Ogunleye, Oluwole Fasakin, Adetolase Bakre, Ifeoluwa Peace Oladapo, Victor Ayodele Aliyu, Emily Onesai Waniwa, Oluwatobi Fasiku, Melina Joshi, Mercy Olorunshola
Rabies remains a significant public health challenge in Africa, primarily burdening impoverished rural communities, with children and young adults being the most vulnerable. Achieving complete elimination in the continent by 2030 requires a coordinated effort hinged on the One Health concept, external support from international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the national governments of endemic countries. Here, we reviewed the various socio-economic and ecological factors influencing the spatial distribution and molecular epidemiology of the disease. To mitigate the transmission of rabies on a global scale, and specifically in Africa, we proposed a multi-pronged approach including enhanced access to healthcare resources, cultural sensitization and massive health promotion with efforts geared towards promoting responsible dog and pet ownership and population management, effective monitoring, and mitigation of environmental changes.
{"title":"Holistic application of the one health approach in the prevention and control of rabies: plausible steps towards achieving the 2030 vision in Africa.","authors":"Olalekan Chris Akinsulie, Oluwawemimo Oluseun Adebowale, Ridwan Olamilekan Adesola, Olamilekan Gabriel Banwo, Ibrahim Idris, Seto Charles Ogunleye, Oluwole Fasakin, Adetolase Bakre, Ifeoluwa Peace Oladapo, Victor Ayodele Aliyu, Emily Onesai Waniwa, Oluwatobi Fasiku, Melina Joshi, Mercy Olorunshola","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00108-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-024-00108-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rabies remains a significant public health challenge in Africa, primarily burdening impoverished rural communities, with children and young adults being the most vulnerable. Achieving complete elimination in the continent by 2030 requires a coordinated effort hinged on the One Health concept, external support from international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the national governments of endemic countries. Here, we reviewed the various socio-economic and ecological factors influencing the spatial distribution and molecular epidemiology of the disease. To mitigate the transmission of rabies on a global scale, and specifically in Africa, we proposed a multi-pronged approach including enhanced access to healthcare resources, cultural sensitization and massive health promotion with efforts geared towards promoting responsible dog and pet ownership and population management, effective monitoring, and mitigation of environmental changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142305467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-02DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00110-y
Steven Lâm, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Meseret Bekele, Kebede Amenu, Silvia Alonso, Fred Unger, Hung Nguyen-Viet
Background: Persistent challenges of fragmented, food safety management in low- and middle-income countries underscore the need for more robustly coordinated mechanisms. National food safety technical working groups, operating under a One Health framework, offer potential in streamlining coordination efforts to effectively address these challenges. However, more clarity regarding their formation and functioning is important for understanding how to best establish and support such groups. The aim of this study is to systematically document the development process of established groups in Vietnam and Ethiopia.
Methods: We assess the process used to establish and support the technical working groups against six critical success factors for multisectoral collaboration: drive change, define, design, realise, relate, and capture success. To do so, we review meeting minutes, Terms of Reference, and other related publications.
Results: The analysis underscores the importance of financial and technical support by development partners in initiating working groups while also highlighting the challenge posed by the absence of legal frameworks to secure government commitment. Embedding the technical working groups within existing government structures - such as One Health platforms - from the outset could help to ensure the active participation and sustainability of such groups.
Conclusion: Both Vietnam and Ethiopia have established operational and institutionalized technical working groups to bolster national food safety efforts under a One Health framework. The approaches employed in these countries could serve as valuable models for others seeking to establish comparable multisectoral collaborative mechanisms to address emerging health risks.
{"title":"How do food safety technical working groups within a One Health framework work? Experiences from Vietnam and Ethiopia.","authors":"Steven Lâm, Sinh Dang-Xuan, Meseret Bekele, Kebede Amenu, Silvia Alonso, Fred Unger, Hung Nguyen-Viet","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00110-y","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00110-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent challenges of fragmented, food safety management in low- and middle-income countries underscore the need for more robustly coordinated mechanisms. National food safety technical working groups, operating under a One Health framework, offer potential in streamlining coordination efforts to effectively address these challenges. However, more clarity regarding their formation and functioning is important for understanding how to best establish and support such groups. The aim of this study is to systematically document the development process of established groups in Vietnam and Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assess the process used to establish and support the technical working groups against six critical success factors for multisectoral collaboration: drive change, define, design, realise, relate, and capture success. To do so, we review meeting minutes, Terms of Reference, and other related publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis underscores the importance of financial and technical support by development partners in initiating working groups while also highlighting the challenge posed by the absence of legal frameworks to secure government commitment. Embedding the technical working groups within existing government structures - such as One Health platforms - from the outset could help to ensure the active participation and sustainability of such groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both Vietnam and Ethiopia have established operational and institutionalized technical working groups to bolster national food safety efforts under a One Health framework. The approaches employed in these countries could serve as valuable models for others seeking to establish comparable multisectoral collaborative mechanisms to address emerging health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Human activities including deforestation, urbanization, and wildlife exploitation increase the risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases. Urban and peri-urban wildlife species often flourish in human-altered environments, with their survival and behavior heavily influenced by human-generated food and waste. In Catalonia, Spain, and other Mediterranean regions, species of rodents, including the house mouse (Mus musculus), black rat (Rattus rattus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), as well as wild boar (Sus scrofa) are common in urban and peri-urban areas. These species host numerous infectious agents, including coronaviruses (CoVs), posing potential human health risks. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) evolved to infect previously non-susceptible species, with variants capable of infecting rodents, emphasizing their importance in surveillance studies.
Methods: The present study assessed SARS-CoV-2 presence and/or exposure in 232 rodents, 313 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs in Catalonia during the pandemic period (2020-2023).
Results: All the animals tested for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (232 rodents and 29 wild boar) were negative. For SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 3 out of 313 (0.96%) wild boar tested positive by ELISA, while the remaining 32 rodents, 310 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs were all negative. Cross-reactivity with other CoVs was predicted for ELISA-positive samples, as the 3 wild boar tested negative by the virus neutralization assay, considered as the gold standard technique.
Conclusions: The absence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure or acute infection in wild boar and rodent species supports their negligible role in viral spread or transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia. However, their proximity to humans and the ongoing genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 underline the need for continued monitoring. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal species can contribute to design measures to control the emergence of new animal reservoirs or intermediate hosts that could facilitate viral spillover events.
{"title":"Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 infection in urban and peri-urban wildlife species from Catalonia (Spain).","authors":"Leira Fernández-Bastit, Tomás Montalvo, Sandra Franco, Laura Barahona, Manel López-Bejar, Annais Carbajal, Encarna Casas-Díaz, Francesc Closa-Sebastià, Joaquim Segalés, Júlia Vergara-Alert","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00109-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00109-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human activities including deforestation, urbanization, and wildlife exploitation increase the risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases. Urban and peri-urban wildlife species often flourish in human-altered environments, with their survival and behavior heavily influenced by human-generated food and waste. In Catalonia, Spain, and other Mediterranean regions, species of rodents, including the house mouse (Mus musculus), black rat (Rattus rattus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), as well as wild boar (Sus scrofa) are common in urban and peri-urban areas. These species host numerous infectious agents, including coronaviruses (CoVs), posing potential human health risks. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) evolved to infect previously non-susceptible species, with variants capable of infecting rodents, emphasizing their importance in surveillance studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study assessed SARS-CoV-2 presence and/or exposure in 232 rodents, 313 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs in Catalonia during the pandemic period (2020-2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the animals tested for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (232 rodents and 29 wild boar) were negative. For SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 3 out of 313 (0.96%) wild boar tested positive by ELISA, while the remaining 32 rodents, 310 wild boar, and 37 Vietnamese Pot-bellied pigs were all negative. Cross-reactivity with other CoVs was predicted for ELISA-positive samples, as the 3 wild boar tested negative by the virus neutralization assay, considered as the gold standard technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The absence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure or acute infection in wild boar and rodent species supports their negligible role in viral spread or transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia. However, their proximity to humans and the ongoing genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 underline the need for continued monitoring. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal species can contribute to design measures to control the emergence of new animal reservoirs or intermediate hosts that could facilitate viral spillover events.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366145/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-14DOI: 10.1186/s42522-024-00111-x
Helen Louise Brown, Isabella Grace Pursley, Daniel L Horton, Roberto M La Ragione
Background: One Health (OH) is defined as a unifying approach aiming to sustainably balance and optimise the health of people, animals and the ecosystem. It recognises that the health of humans, animals (both domestic and wild), plants and the wider ecosystem are both interdependent and linked. As a concept, it aims to address complex problems requiring input from multiple disciplines. Suitable issues for OH approaches typically include global issues which can widely impact not only the health of humans and animals, but also have a significant environmental impact. Examples include emerging zoonotic diseases and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Interpretations and use of the term OH differ in the literature and have the potential to dilute its impact. The meaning of OH among the research community has evolved over time. Here, we collate the OH relevant literature from the last two decades, identifying major themes and trends and considering how OH has been embraced differently across various geographical regions.
Methods and results: Bibliographic databases were searched using the term "One Health" AND ("Veterinary" OR "Animal") AND ("Medicine" OR "Human") AND ("Environment" OR "Ecosystem") during the period between 1980 and 2022. Data analysis and narrative synthesis identified themes, similarities, and differences within literature. Web of Science and PubMed returned 948 and 1250 results for the period mentioned above. The predominant literature focused on human health, with veterinary health second, although often to benefit human health. It was found that OH is often utilised as a public health approach, generally towards the end of disease surveillance and control. Interestingly, while authors from low- and middle-income countries were well-represented within studies using the term OH, they were less well-represented as corresponding authors.
Conclusions: The predominant focus of the literature was on human and veterinary health, implying OH approach is human-orientated, despite its suggestion that all domains share a common 'health'. Potential improvement to OH could be achieved through greater incorporation of the environmental and social sciences for a more encompassing approach.
{"title":"One health: a structured review and commentary on trends and themes.","authors":"Helen Louise Brown, Isabella Grace Pursley, Daniel L Horton, Roberto M La Ragione","doi":"10.1186/s42522-024-00111-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s42522-024-00111-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One Health (OH) is defined as a unifying approach aiming to sustainably balance and optimise the health of people, animals and the ecosystem. It recognises that the health of humans, animals (both domestic and wild), plants and the wider ecosystem are both interdependent and linked. As a concept, it aims to address complex problems requiring input from multiple disciplines. Suitable issues for OH approaches typically include global issues which can widely impact not only the health of humans and animals, but also have a significant environmental impact. Examples include emerging zoonotic diseases and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Interpretations and use of the term OH differ in the literature and have the potential to dilute its impact. The meaning of OH among the research community has evolved over time. Here, we collate the OH relevant literature from the last two decades, identifying major themes and trends and considering how OH has been embraced differently across various geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Bibliographic databases were searched using the term \"One Health\" AND (\"Veterinary\" OR \"Animal\") AND (\"Medicine\" OR \"Human\") AND (\"Environment\" OR \"Ecosystem\") during the period between 1980 and 2022. Data analysis and narrative synthesis identified themes, similarities, and differences within literature. Web of Science and PubMed returned 948 and 1250 results for the period mentioned above. The predominant literature focused on human health, with veterinary health second, although often to benefit human health. It was found that OH is often utilised as a public health approach, generally towards the end of disease surveillance and control. Interestingly, while authors from low- and middle-income countries were well-represented within studies using the term OH, they were less well-represented as corresponding authors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predominant focus of the literature was on human and veterinary health, implying OH approach is human-orientated, despite its suggestion that all domains share a common 'health'. Potential improvement to OH could be achieved through greater incorporation of the environmental and social sciences for a more encompassing approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":94348,"journal":{"name":"One health outlook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323492/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}