Cancer treatment and research communications最新文献

Objective

To characterize the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer (HR-LACC).

Methods

This retrospective study identified and randomly selected adults diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. For patients initially treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we estimated real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) among those with persistent disease, real-world time on CCRT, and recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

The cohort included 300 patients. Median age at diagnosis was 51 years. 53.7 % were White and 30.0 % were Black; 52.0 % were premenopausal; 89.3 % had squamous cell histology; 75.3 % had stage III disease, and 92.7 % had no evidence of performance status impairment. Initial treatment included CCRT (N = 229), surgery (N = 28), antineoplastics only (N = 11), and radiation only (N = 5). Twenty-seven patients were untreated. Baseline characteristics for the CCRT-first patients were similar to the overall cohort; their median real-world time on treatment was 1.6 months; 78.2 % received cisplatin for a median of 1.2 months; 28.4 % received antineoplastics after CCRT, and 11.8 % initiated a second antineoplastic therapy. Of the CCRT-first patients, 27/143 with a complete response had subsequent recurrent disease (median rwRFS not reached). 179 patients had persistent disease, among whom median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) rwPFS was 29.7 (16.9–59.3) months.

Conclusion

In this study of United States-based clinical practices, most HR-LACC patients received CCRT as initial treatment. Many patients developed persistent disease after CCRT indicating a need for improved first treatment and maintenance options.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by high initial responses to platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, most patients quickly relapse and require subsequent treatment. Second-line treatment options in SCLC remain limited, and treatment algorithms are not completely consistent across the available guidelines in this setting. This review highlights key considerations regarding selection of second-line treatment for patients with relapsed SCLC. In particular, the role of lurbinectedin, which was first approved in 2020, representing the first significant addition to treatment algorithms in this setting for decades, is summarized. Future directions, including the identification of SCLC subtypes and the need for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and targeted therapy, are also discussed.

Objectives

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the salivary glands has poor long-term prognosis and a high metastatic rate. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), first-line immune activators, have been associated with both tumor progression and suppression. We aimed to study TLR3 and TLR7 behavior in ACC.

Materials and methods

We studied TLR3 and TLR7 immunoexpression of 46 minor salivary gland ACCs diagnosed at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland over the period 1974–2012. The associations of TLR3 and TLR7 immunoexpression with clinicopathological factors were evaluated by χ²-test and Fisher's exact test.

Results

In the majority of samples, both TLR3 and TLR7 were immunoexpressed in cytoplasm. The immunoexpression was heterogeneous between individual tumors. Stronger TLR7 immunoexpression associated with recurrence rate and poorer disease-specific survival (DSS). TLR3 did not associate significantly with survival although we found an inverse correlation between TLR3 and TLR7 immunopositivity. Hence, when TLR3 immunoexpression was negative or mild, TLR7 immunoexpression was moderate to strong, and vice versa.

Conclusions

TLR3 and TLR7 are immunoexpressed in minor salivary gland ACC. TLR7 is potentially an independent prognostic marker for recurrence rate and DSS.

Background

Oral cancer is one of the ten most common malignancies in the world and approximately 90 % of cases are OSCC. Despite the progress in available treatment modalities, the mortality of patients with OSCC has remained steadily high during the last 20 years. Survival data is strongly influenced by the timing of diagnosis: with more than 50 % of patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage, and their 5-year survival rate being less than 50 %. Therefore, early diagnosis plays a crucial role in improving a patient's prognosis, as early stage cancers show a survival rate of over 90 %, whereas it drops to 5–20 % stage III and IV disease. This prospective study has been conducted with an aim of assessing diagnostic delays and looking at the various patient and tumour factors and their association with them.

Methodology

This prospective observational study was conducted from December 2023 to February 2024. The cases for the present study included cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed by clinical, radiological and/or histological confirmation. The patient delay was recorded in days as informed by the patients themselves, about the onset of their symptoms to time taken to seek medical attention. This was then associated with various patient and tumour related factors.

Result

A total of 120 (n) patients were interviewed and these patient's case sheets were recruited for the present study. The median primary delay for the entire population was found to be 90 days while the median secondary delay was 11 days. The median total delay was found to be 106 days. The median total delay was higher among females and younger population though this was not statistically significant. However education showed a significant impact with literate patients presenting much earlier. Smoking and alcohol abuse did not show a significant effect on delay. Various tumour factors also did not show any statistically significant effect on delay although, patients with advanced stage and nodal secondaries presented at a much later time.

Conclusion

Both patient and tumour related factors as well as the decisions made during the first contact with health care providers influence delay before specialist consultation. Raising awareness of HNC symptoms among the general population and GPs is the way to get patients to curative treatment without long delay.

Background

Molecular characterization is pivotal for managing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although this process is often time-consuming and patients’ conditions might worsen while molecular analyses are processed.

Our primary aim was to evaluate the performance of “up-front” next-generation sequencing (NGS) through liquid biopsy (LB) of hospitalized patients with newly detected lung neoplasm in parallel with conventional diagnosis. The secondary aim included longitudinal monitoring through LB of patients with oncogenic alterations at baseline.

Methods

We enrolled 47 consecutive patients immediately after hospitalization and radiological detection of symptomatic lung neoplasm. LB from peripheral blood was performed at baseline, in parallel with conventional biopsy (CB), when feasible. Additionally, LBs were repeated during treatment in patients with actionable gene alterations at baseline. Oncomine™ Lung cfTNA Research Assay panel was employed for processing plasma samples in NGS.

Results

47 hospitalized patients were enrolled. LB identified 28 patients with gene alterations, including mutations of EGFR (n = 7), KRAS (n = 12), ERBB2 (n = 1), TP53 (n = 2), BRAF (n = 1), one ALK rearrangement, and 4 patients with combined mutations involving EGFR, KRAS and PIK3CA.

LB and CB were consistent, except for two patients. Three patients with positive LB for oncogenic drivers did not undergo CB due to contraindications.

Median time to molecular results after LB was significantly lower compared to time to molecular report after CB (11 versus 22 days, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite limited numbers, our study supports the role of front-line LB for improving management of symptomatic patients with lung cancer, potentially leading to early targeted therapy initiation.

Despite the advancements in the treatment of localized pancreatic cancer, several unresolved issues persist in clinical practice, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. These include determining the criteria for selecting patients for treatment, identifying the most effective chemotherapy regimens, understanding the role of radiotherapy, and accurately assessing how patients respond to treatment. Current strategies for assessing patients before surgery involve thoroughly evaluating their overall health status, analyzing tumor markers, and using advanced imaging techniques. However, existing methods for staging the disease still have limitations when it comes to accurately detecting metastatic cancer. The ongoing debate between performing surgery upfront or administering neoadjuvant therapy highlights the need for robust clinical evidence to guide treatment decisions effectively. This review analyzes the evidence regarding controversial topics in neoadjuvant pancreatic cancer treatment and discusses further research efforts to enhance patient outcomes. To improve the outcomes found with surgery alone, multimodal treatment with chemotherapy.

Introduction

The landscape of breast reconstruction has changed significantly with a shift in focus to include the restoration of a patient's quality of life after cancer. Reconstructive options can be divided into alloplastic (implant based) and autologous (tissue based). This paper aims to provide a current educational summary regarding implant-based reconstruction after breast cancer surgery and review the current literature.

Method

A review of the literature was conducted utilising standard PRISMA flowchart. Databases searched included Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE.

Results

Current practice is explored within the text, including types of implants, indications, and surgical approaches. Heterogenous cohorts, surgical technique variation, and selection bias can make comparison of the literature challenging. The major evidence reviews of implant-based reconstruction topics are discussed including, ADM use, radiotherapy, and complications. Despite the benefits of autologous reconstruction, implant-based techniques still represent a significant proportion of reconstructive breast procedures. However, implant-reconstruction is not without its risks and limitations and, with such variety in practice, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence guiding practice. Most importantly, patients need to be counselled about the pros and cons of each choice, particularly with the increasing utilisation of radiotherapy post-reconstruction. Ultimately, the patient and surgeon should reach a decision in full knowledge of the risks and potential outcomes.

Conclusions

Further research is required into implant-based reconstructive therapy, which will allow a greater consensus for management and a pathway for both surgeons and patients.

Introduction

Myelosuppression, a challenge in cancer treatment, often results in severe complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, particularly pegfilgrastim, mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This narrative review evaluates the role of on-body injector (OBI) devices for pegfilgrastim administration. A comprehensive search strategy of PubMed and AI-powered intuitive search tools, complemented by authors’ contributions, yielded a body of papers presenting evidence on OBI devices, their effectiveness and safety, the benefits and challenges of OBI versus pre-filled syringe administration, patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration, and economic considerations.

Discussion

OBI devices prove effective and safe, with advantages such as reduced clinic visits and enhanced adherence. Studies highlight cost-efficiency and expanded access, emphasizing the socioeconomic context. Patient and provider preferences underscore the potential of OBI devices in cancer care, with implications for healthcare resource utilization and pharmacoeconomics.

Conclusion

The value proposition of OBI devices lies in improving patient outcomes, convenience, resource optimization, and enhancing the overall cancer care experience. As biosimilar OBIs enter the market, they may offer cost savings, further influencing their adoption and their positioning as a cost-efficient alternative in cancer care. Ongoing research and technological advancements are expected to contribute to the broader acceptance of OBI devices in cancer care delivery.

Background

Reliable biomarkers are needed to identify tumor recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with curative intent. This could improve consolidation therapy of progressing patients. However, the approach of existing studies has limited transferability to the clinic.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of 135 plasma samples from 56 inoperable NSCLC patients who received CRT with curative intent was performed. Plasma samples collected at baseline, at the first check-up (average 1.6 months post-RT), and at the second check-up (average 4.5 months post-RT) were analyzed by deep sequencing with a commercially available cancer personalized profiling strategy (CAPP-Seq) using a tumor-agnostic approach.

Results

Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 4.5 months after therapy was significantly associated with higher odds of tumor recurrence (OR: 5.4 (CI: 1.1–31), Fisher's exact test: p-value = 0.022), and shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR: 4.1 (CI: 1.7–10); log-rank test: p-value = 9e-04). In contrast, detection of ctDNA at 1.6 months after therapy was not associated with higher odds of tumor recurrence (OR: 2.7 (CI: 0.67–12), Fisher's exact test: p-value = 0.13) or shorter RFS (HR: 1.5 (CI: 0.67–3.3); log-rank test: p-value = 0.32).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the detection of ctDNA can be used to identify minimal residual disease 4.5 months after CRT in NSCLC patients using a commercially available kit and a tumor-agnostic approach. Furthermore, the time point of collecting the plasma sample after CRT has decisive importance for the prognostic value of ctDNA.

Micro abstract

This study analysed 135 plasma samples from 56 NSCLC patients treated with curative intent chemoradiotherapy using a tumor-agnostic approach. Detecting ctDNA at 4.5 months post-treatment was linked to higher recurrence odds, indicating ctDNA's potential as a biomarker for identifying residual disease after treatment with curative intent. Importantly, the study emphasizes the importance of timing for accurate ctDNA analysis results.

Aim

To assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) trastuzumab (Herceptin) administered either with a single-use injection device (SID) or manually from a vial using a hand-held syringe.

Methods

The ESCAPE trial (NCT02194166) included 90 women aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment and completed (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if indicated). Patients enrolled in the study were first subjected to 4 cycles of trastuzumab IV (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose, q3w) prior to being randomized into groups: [A] SC trastuzumab (fixed dose 600 mg, q3w) administered through a hand-held syringe followed by 7 cycles of SC trastuzumab administered with an SID or [B] the reverse sequence.

Results

Patient-reported outcomes revealed that 78 (94.0 % [95 % CI: 90.4–99.0]) out of 83 patients preferred SC trastuzumab over IV trastuzumab, among whom 28 patients indicated a strong preference. Sixteen out of 17 HCPs (94.1 %) were very satisfied with the use of SC trastuzumab, while 1/17 (5.9 %) remained uncertain. The mean time spent for IV vs. SC trastuzumab administration, including pre- and postinjection procedures, was 93.8 and 22 min, respectively. A total of 49 (54.4 %) patients reported 164 AEs.

Conclusions

In this trial, SC trastuzumab was preferred over IV trastuzumab. The duration of SC trastuzumab administration was significantly shorter than that of IV trastuzumab, saving patients and HCPs time. Safety and efficacy results were consistent with other published trials and were not associated with any new safety signal.