Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.000725
Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and medicine - inevitable but not invulnerable for now.","authors":"Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball","doi":"10.1503/cjs.000725","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.000725","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E62-E63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014623
Rachael Pack, Mary C Ott, Sayra Cristancho, Melissa Chin, Julie Ann Van Koughnett, Michael Ott
Background: Given the complexity of the transition to competency-based medical education (CBME) and the diversity of systems and learning contexts, the literature has acknowledged the need for principled yet contextual approaches to implementation. There is a need for research that examines these adaptations and their consequences, both intended and unintended.
Methods: We performed a constructivist grounded theory study to explore how the theory of CBME translated to practice in operative settings in a Canadian approach to CBME: Competence by Design (CBD).
Results: Program contexts both enabled and hindered how CBD translated into practice. The operative context was aligned with the principles of competency-focused instruction and allowed for frequent, direct observation and formative feedback. Time, personnel, and technology constraints unique to the patterns of practice in operative settings hindered programmatic assessment.
Conclusion: Adaptations to CBME that are responsive to the context of programs can support the intended conceptual learning conditions of CBME.
{"title":"Lost in translation? How context shapes the implementation of Competence by Design in operative settings.","authors":"Rachael Pack, Mary C Ott, Sayra Cristancho, Melissa Chin, Julie Ann Van Koughnett, Michael Ott","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014623","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.014623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the complexity of the transition to competency-based medical education (CBME) and the diversity of systems and learning contexts, the literature has acknowledged the need for principled yet contextual approaches to implementation. There is a need for research that examines these adaptations and their consequences, both intended and unintended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a constructivist grounded theory study to explore how the theory of CBME translated to practice in operative settings in a Canadian approach to CBME: Competence by Design (CBD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Program contexts both enabled and hindered how CBD translated into practice. The operative context was aligned with the principles of competency-focused instruction and allowed for frequent, direct observation and formative feedback. Time, personnel, and technology constraints unique to the patterns of practice in operative settings hindered programmatic assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adaptations to CBME that are responsive to the context of programs can support the intended conceptual learning conditions of CBME.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E49-E54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.007724
Garrett Johnson, Haven Roy, Sandra Webber, Farhana Shariff, Ramzi Helewa, David Hochman, Jason Park, Eric Hyun
Background: Workplace injuries are increasingly recognized as a substantial detriment to surgeon longevity and productivity. Limited data exist on pain and injury prevalence among rectal surgeons. In this epidemiologic study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical discomfort among rectal surgeons in Canada and identify potential causative factors.
Methods: We distributed a web-based survey to rectal surgeons in Canada between January and October 2022. We included colorectal surgeons, surgical oncologists, and colorectal surgery fellows associated with Canadian university hospitals.
Results: Of the 72 surgeons we contacted, 48 participated (67%). More than 98% reported experiencing physical discomfort or pain during rectal surgery, with more than half experiencing these symptoms weekly. Neck, shoulders, and back were common pain or discomfort locations, whether surgeons were performing open surgery or using a minimally invasive platform. Laparoscopic equipment, headlight, and pelvic retractor use were the most common causes. Many surgeons (54%) sought professional treatment and employed risk-reducing strategies such as intraoperative stretching (48%) or after-work strength training exercises (52%). Satisfaction with pain levels during surgery was uncommon (40%). Multivariable analysis showed advancing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.23) and larger percentage of minimally invasive surgeries (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33) as significant predictors of increased discomfort. After-work exercise participation was protective in both open (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95) and minimally invasive surgeries (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98).
Conclusion: Rectal surgeons in Canada commonly experience pain and injury during surgery, underscoring the need for improved safety measures to preserve their physical health and career longevity.
背景:工作场所伤害越来越被认为是对外科医生寿命和工作效率的重大损害。关于直肠外科医生疼痛和损伤患病率的数据有限。在这项流行病学研究中,我们旨在估计加拿大直肠外科医生身体不适的患病率,并确定潜在的致病因素。方法:我们在2022年1月至10月期间向加拿大的直肠外科医生分发了一份基于网络的调查。我们包括结直肠外科医生、外科肿瘤学家和与加拿大大学医院有关的结直肠外科研究员。结果:在我们联系的72位外科医生中,48位参与了手术(67%)。超过98%的人报告在直肠手术中感到身体不适或疼痛,超过一半的人每周都会出现这些症状。无论外科医生是进行开放手术还是使用微创平台,颈部、肩部和背部都是常见的疼痛或不适部位。腹腔镜设备、前灯和骨盆牵开器的使用是最常见的原因。许多外科医生(54%)寻求专业治疗,并采取降低风险的策略,如术中拉伸(48%)或术后力量训练(52%)。手术期间对疼痛程度的满意度不高(40%)。多变量分析显示,高龄(优势比[OR] 1.12, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.02-1.23)和较大比例的微创手术(优势比[OR] 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33)是不适感增加的重要预测因素。在开放性手术(OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95)和微创手术(OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98)中,参加下班后运动均具有保护作用。结论:加拿大直肠外科医生在手术过程中通常会遇到疼痛和损伤,强调需要改进安全措施以保护他们的身体健康和职业寿命。
{"title":"Colorectal surgeon physical pain and conditioning: a national survey.","authors":"Garrett Johnson, Haven Roy, Sandra Webber, Farhana Shariff, Ramzi Helewa, David Hochman, Jason Park, Eric Hyun","doi":"10.1503/cjs.007724","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.007724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace injuries are increasingly recognized as a substantial detriment to surgeon longevity and productivity. Limited data exist on pain and injury prevalence among rectal surgeons. In this epidemiologic study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical discomfort among rectal surgeons in Canada and identify potential causative factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a web-based survey to rectal surgeons in Canada between January and October 2022. We included colorectal surgeons, surgical oncologists, and colorectal surgery fellows associated with Canadian university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 72 surgeons we contacted, 48 participated (67%). More than 98% reported experiencing physical discomfort or pain during rectal surgery, with more than half experiencing these symptoms weekly. Neck, shoulders, and back were common pain or discomfort locations, whether surgeons were performing open surgery or using a minimally invasive platform. Laparoscopic equipment, headlight, and pelvic retractor use were the most common causes. Many surgeons (54%) sought professional treatment and employed risk-reducing strategies such as intraoperative stretching (48%) or after-work strength training exercises (52%). Satisfaction with pain levels during surgery was uncommon (40%). Multivariable analysis showed advancing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.23) and larger percentage of minimally invasive surgeries (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33) as significant predictors of increased discomfort. After-work exercise participation was protective in both open (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95) and minimally invasive surgeries (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rectal surgeons in Canada commonly experience pain and injury during surgery, underscoring the need for improved safety measures to preserve their physical health and career longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E64-E70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014723
Anser Daud, Tyler M Hauer, Kalter Hali, Noah Carr-Pries, Jesse I Wolfstadt, Peter Ferguson
Background: Studies have highlighted inadequate exposure to musculoskeletal education and orthopedic surgery in mandatory medical school curricula; thus, the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC) was designed to enhance medical education around orthopedic surgery and common musculoskeletal presentations encountered in primary care. We sought to explore the effectiveness of COSMEC in preparing medical students for clinical training and future practice.
Methods: Canadian and international medical students were invited to participate in COSMEC, a 12-week virtual course led by orthopedic faculty and senior residents. Teaching objectives were guided by the musculoskeletal objectives of the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination and expert opinion. We administered pre- and postcourse surveys to assess outcomes related to participant knowledge, confidence, and interest in orthopedic surgery.
Results: A total of 133 medical students registered and completed COSMEC. Of these, we received 84 paired pre- and postcourse surveys. Knowledge scores improved from 7.9 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6) to 9.7 (SD 2.0) out of 14 (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in participant-reported confidence in performing a history and physical examination, understanding the basic components of fracture management, managing bone and joint emergencies, and describing fracture radiographs (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Overall, COSMEC enhanced knowledge and confidence in orthopedic and musculoskeletal topics and is an effective extracurricular learning resource for medical students. It can help prepare medical students for future training and practice involving orthopedic and musculoskeletal patient presentations.
{"title":"Outcomes of the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC): a virtual curriculum to enhance medical student learning.","authors":"Anser Daud, Tyler M Hauer, Kalter Hali, Noah Carr-Pries, Jesse I Wolfstadt, Peter Ferguson","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014723","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.014723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have highlighted inadequate exposure to musculoskeletal education and orthopedic surgery in mandatory medical school curricula; thus, the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC) was designed to enhance medical education around orthopedic surgery and common musculoskeletal presentations encountered in primary care. We sought to explore the effectiveness of COSMEC in preparing medical students for clinical training and future practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Canadian and international medical students were invited to participate in COSMEC, a 12-week virtual course led by orthopedic faculty and senior residents. Teaching objectives were guided by the musculoskeletal objectives of the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination and expert opinion. We administered pre- and postcourse surveys to assess outcomes related to participant knowledge, confidence, and interest in orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 medical students registered and completed COSMEC. Of these, we received 84 paired pre- and postcourse surveys. Knowledge scores improved from 7.9 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6) to 9.7 (SD 2.0) out of 14 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were significant improvements in participant-reported confidence in performing a history and physical examination, understanding the basic components of fracture management, managing bone and joint emergencies, and describing fracture radiographs (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, COSMEC enhanced knowledge and confidence in orthopedic and musculoskeletal topics and is an effective extracurricular learning resource for medical students. It can help prepare medical students for future training and practice involving orthopedic and musculoskeletal patient presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E55-E61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818783/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.001025
Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball
{"title":"IA et médecine — un mariage incontournable, mais encore imparfait.","authors":"Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball","doi":"10.1503/cjs.001025","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.001025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E71-E72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Robotic surgery has seen substantial growth over the years and continues to show promise, with recent implementation into orthopedic surgery. There is limited literature available on patient attitudes and comfort level with robotic compared with conventional surgery. We aimed to develop an understanding of patient views on robot-assisted knee replacement to help the development of patient education materials and facilitate successful implementation.
Methods: A qualitative, descriptive methodology was used. Included participants were those who had undergone total knee replacement in the last 5 years. Participants completed an online semistructured interview assessing their past experiences and their fears and assumptions about robotic surgery. An inductive thematic analysis was completed to organize and present the major themes.
Results: Four overarching themes described the areas patients focused on: advancements in surgery, perception of robotic surgery and surgeons, reliability, and patient education materials. Major subthemes included the proven reliability of robots, safety fears, and efficacy. Some participants' fear centred around robot autonomy. Greater comfort with the use of robots would occur if patients were given information about the role of the robot before surgery.
Conclusion: Patient education materials can help alleviate fears and prevent misperceptions about robot-assisted knee replacement. Materials should include themes of surgical advancements and how surgeons interact with these advancements, level of robot autonomy, and the reliability and safety of the robot.
{"title":"The acceptance of robots in the orthopedic joint replacement operating room.","authors":"Lauren Kelenc, Daryl Stephenson, Dianne Bryant, Brent Lanting","doi":"10.1503/cjs.016523","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.016523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic surgery has seen substantial growth over the years and continues to show promise, with recent implementation into orthopedic surgery. There is limited literature available on patient attitudes and comfort level with robotic compared with conventional surgery. We aimed to develop an understanding of patient views on robot-assisted knee replacement to help the development of patient education materials and facilitate successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, descriptive methodology was used. Included participants were those who had undergone total knee replacement in the last 5 years. Participants completed an online semistructured interview assessing their past experiences and their fears and assumptions about robotic surgery. An inductive thematic analysis was completed to organize and present the major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes described the areas patients focused on: advancements in surgery, perception of robotic surgery and surgeons, reliability, and patient education materials. Major subthemes included the proven reliability of robots, safety fears, and efficacy. Some participants' fear centred around robot autonomy. Greater comfort with the use of robots would occur if patients were given information about the role of the robot before surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient education materials can help alleviate fears and prevent misperceptions about robot-assisted knee replacement. Materials should include themes of surgical advancements and how surgeons interact with these advancements, level of robot autonomy, and the reliability and safety of the robot.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E32-E40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-16Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012023
Abigail Frazer, Silvio Ndoja, Holly S Howe, Supriya Singh
Background: Gender disparities exist in several surgical specialties, particularly in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in gender diversity among orthopedic surgical residents in Canada over the last 20 years.
Methods: We analyzed gender distribution data for orthopedic trainees from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) for 2013-2022 and the Canadian Post-MD Education Registry for 2000-2022 using linear and quadratic regressions.
Results: More male (4.7%) than female medical students (1.9%) applied to an orthopedics program (p < 0.001). The proportion of male applicants entering CaRMS who applied to orthopedics followed a quadratic (U-shaped) distribution over time (p = 0.01). The proportion of female applicants remained unchanged from 2013 to 2022 (p > 0.9). However, for matching results, among the applicants who applied to orthopedic surgery, there was no gender effect (men 56.1% matched, women 50.3% matched; p = 0.3). The proportion of residency spots offered to female applicants remained at around 30%, without significant changes over time (p = 0.1). The number of female orthopedic graduates increased linearly from 2000 to 2021 (p < 0.001), projected to reach gender equalization (at 50%) by 2060. Female residents experienced higher attrition in residency (3.4%) than male residents (2.1%; p = 0.05), and this gender difference is decreasing over time (p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Over 2 decades, women have shown consistently lower rates of application to orthopedic surgery programs than their male colleagues. Women who matched experienced higher attrition rates than men, although this appears to be improving over time.
{"title":"Gender trends in orthopedic surgical residency programs in Canada over 20 years.","authors":"Abigail Frazer, Silvio Ndoja, Holly S Howe, Supriya Singh","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012023","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.012023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparities exist in several surgical specialties, particularly in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in gender diversity among orthopedic surgical residents in Canada over the last 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed gender distribution data for orthopedic trainees from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) for 2013-2022 and the Canadian Post-MD Education Registry for 2000-2022 using linear and quadratic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More male (4.7%) than female medical students (1.9%) applied to an orthopedics program (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of male applicants entering CaRMS who applied to orthopedics followed a quadratic (U-shaped) distribution over time (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The proportion of female applicants remained unchanged from 2013 to 2022 (<i>p</i> > 0.9). However, for matching results, among the applicants who applied to orthopedic surgery, there was no gender effect (men 56.1% matched, women 50.3% matched; <i>p</i> = 0.3). The proportion of residency spots offered to female applicants remained at around 30%, without significant changes over time (<i>p</i> = 0.1). The number of female orthopedic graduates increased linearly from 2000 to 2021 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), projected to reach gender equalization (at 50%) by 2060. Female residents experienced higher attrition in residency (3.4%) than male residents (2.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.05), and this gender difference is decreasing over time (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 2 decades, women have shown consistently lower rates of application to orthopedic surgery programs than their male colleagues. Women who matched experienced higher attrition rates than men, although this appears to be improving over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E41-E47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-03Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010423
Jordan J Levett, Lior M Elkaim, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou
Background: Robotic technology has been used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for several years. Despite the advances in this field, perspectives surrounding robotic THA are not fully understood. This study aimed to characterize the landscape of robotic THA on social media.
Methods: The Twitter application programming interface was queried from inception to October 2022 for keywords related to THA and robotics. Posts and accounts were extracted and classified using thematic labels. Sentiment analysis was performed on the extracted tweets.
Results: After removal of duplicate posts and illegitimate accounts, a total of 742 tweets from 741 accounts were retrieved. Most posts pertained to raising awareness about robotic THA (n = 340, 45.8%), advertisements for THA robots (n = 204, 27.5%), and personal experiences (n = 138, 18.6%). Research was discussed in 7.0% (n = 52) of posts. Most accounts belonged to patients or caregivers (n = 177, 23.9%), followed by medical centres (n = 175, 23.6%), news outlets (n = 158, 21.3%), and physicians or researchers (n = 101, 13.6%). Most posts discussing personal experience were positive (n = 70, 50.7%) or neutral (n = 39, 28.2%). Presence of media (β = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.1) and tagging (β = 2.1, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8) positively affected user engagement, whereas the presence of a link decreased tweet engagement count by 2.8 (95% CI -5.4 to -0.2).
Conclusion: Topics about robotic THA were discussed in a positive tone on Twitter (rebranded to X in 2023). Posts about raising awareness and advertisements for robotic THA were most prevalent, while research-related posts were limited. Orthopedic surgeons can leverage social media to better understand patient perspectives and glean insight from the robotic surgery industry.
Contexte: La robotique est utilisée depuis plusieurs années pour l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH). Malgré les progrès réalisés dans ce domaine, on connaît encore mal l'opinion qu'elle suscite. La présente étude visait à dresser un tableau de l'ATH robotisée telle qu'on l'aborde sur les réseaux sociaux. MÉTHODES: L'interface de programmation d'application de Twitter a été analysée depuis sa création et jusqu'à octobre 2022 à partir de mots clés reliés à l'ATH et à la robotique. Les messages et les comptes ont été extraits et classés par thèmes et une analyse des sentiments a été effectuée à partir de ces messages. RÉSULTATS: Après élimination des doublons et des faux comptes, nous avons retenu en tout 742 messages provenant de 741 comptes. La plupart visaient à faire connaître l'ATH assistée par robot (n = 340, 45,8 %), faisaient la publicité pour des robots d'ATH (n = 204, 27,5 %) et relataient des expériences personnelles (n = 138, 18,6 %). La recherche était abordée dans 7
{"title":"Perspectives surrounding robotic total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional analysis using natural language processing.","authors":"Jordan J Levett, Lior M Elkaim, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou","doi":"10.1503/cjs.010423","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.010423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic technology has been used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for several years. Despite the advances in this field, perspectives surrounding robotic THA are not fully understood. This study aimed to characterize the landscape of robotic THA on social media.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Twitter application programming interface was queried from inception to October 2022 for keywords related to THA and robotics. Posts and accounts were extracted and classified using thematic labels. Sentiment analysis was performed on the extracted tweets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After removal of duplicate posts and illegitimate accounts, a total of 742 tweets from 741 accounts were retrieved. Most posts pertained to raising awareness about robotic THA (<i>n</i> = 340, 45.8%), advertisements for THA robots (<i>n</i> = 204, 27.5%), and personal experiences (<i>n</i> = 138, 18.6%). Research was discussed in 7.0% (<i>n</i> = 52) of posts. Most accounts belonged to patients or caregivers (<i>n</i> = 177, 23.9%), followed by medical centres (<i>n</i> = 175, 23.6%), news outlets (<i>n</i> = 158, 21.3%), and physicians or researchers (<i>n</i> = 101, 13.6%). Most posts discussing personal experience were positive (<i>n</i> = 70, 50.7%) or neutral (<i>n</i> = 39, 28.2%). Presence of media (β = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.1) and tagging (β = 2.1, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8) positively affected user engagement, whereas the presence of a link decreased tweet engagement count by 2.8 (95% CI -5.4 to -0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topics about robotic THA were discussed in a positive tone on Twitter (rebranded to X in 2023). Posts about raising awareness and advertisements for robotic THA were most prevalent, while research-related posts were limited. Orthopedic surgeons can leverage social media to better understand patient perspectives and glean insight from the robotic surgery industry.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>La robotique est utilisée depuis plusieurs années pour l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH). Malgré les progrès réalisés dans ce domaine, on connaît encore mal l'opinion qu'elle suscite. La présente étude visait à dresser un tableau de l'ATH robotisée telle qu'on l'aborde sur les réseaux sociaux. MÉTHODES: L'interface de programmation d'application de Twitter a été analysée depuis sa création et jusqu'à octobre 2022 à partir de mots clés reliés à l'ATH et à la robotique. Les messages et les comptes ont été extraits et classés par thèmes et une analyse des sentiments a été effectuée à partir de ces messages. RÉSULTATS: Après élimination des doublons et des faux comptes, nous avons retenu en tout 742 messages provenant de 741 comptes. La plupart visaient à faire connaître l'ATH assistée par robot (<i>n</i> = 340, 45,8 %), faisaient la publicité pour des robots d'ATH (<i>n</i> = 204, 27,5 %) et relataient des expériences personnelles (<i>n</i> = 138, 18,6 %). La recherche était abordée dans 7","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E10-E16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684921/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}