Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014723
Anser Daud, Tyler M Hauer, Kalter Hali, Noah Carr-Pries, Jesse I Wolfstadt, Peter Ferguson
Background: Studies have highlighted inadequate exposure to musculoskeletal education and orthopedic surgery in mandatory medical school curricula; thus, the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC) was designed to enhance medical education around orthopedic surgery and common musculoskeletal presentations encountered in primary care. We sought to explore the effectiveness of COSMEC in preparing medical students for clinical training and future practice.
Methods: Canadian and international medical students were invited to participate in COSMEC, a 12-week virtual course led by orthopedic faculty and senior residents. Teaching objectives were guided by the musculoskeletal objectives of the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination and expert opinion. We administered pre- and postcourse surveys to assess outcomes related to participant knowledge, confidence, and interest in orthopedic surgery.
Results: A total of 133 medical students registered and completed COSMEC. Of these, we received 84 paired pre- and postcourse surveys. Knowledge scores improved from 7.9 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6) to 9.7 (SD 2.0) out of 14 (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in participant-reported confidence in performing a history and physical examination, understanding the basic components of fracture management, managing bone and joint emergencies, and describing fracture radiographs (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Overall, COSMEC enhanced knowledge and confidence in orthopedic and musculoskeletal topics and is an effective extracurricular learning resource for medical students. It can help prepare medical students for future training and practice involving orthopedic and musculoskeletal patient presentations.
{"title":"Outcomes of the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC): a virtual curriculum to enhance medical student learning.","authors":"Anser Daud, Tyler M Hauer, Kalter Hali, Noah Carr-Pries, Jesse I Wolfstadt, Peter Ferguson","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014723","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.014723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have highlighted inadequate exposure to musculoskeletal education and orthopedic surgery in mandatory medical school curricula; thus, the Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Medical Education Course (COSMEC) was designed to enhance medical education around orthopedic surgery and common musculoskeletal presentations encountered in primary care. We sought to explore the effectiveness of COSMEC in preparing medical students for clinical training and future practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Canadian and international medical students were invited to participate in COSMEC, a 12-week virtual course led by orthopedic faculty and senior residents. Teaching objectives were guided by the musculoskeletal objectives of the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination and expert opinion. We administered pre- and postcourse surveys to assess outcomes related to participant knowledge, confidence, and interest in orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 medical students registered and completed COSMEC. Of these, we received 84 paired pre- and postcourse surveys. Knowledge scores improved from 7.9 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6) to 9.7 (SD 2.0) out of 14 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were significant improvements in participant-reported confidence in performing a history and physical examination, understanding the basic components of fracture management, managing bone and joint emergencies, and describing fracture radiographs (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, COSMEC enhanced knowledge and confidence in orthopedic and musculoskeletal topics and is an effective extracurricular learning resource for medical students. It can help prepare medical students for future training and practice involving orthopedic and musculoskeletal patient presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E55-E61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818783/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.001025
Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball
{"title":"IA et médecine — un mariage incontournable, mais encore imparfait.","authors":"Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball","doi":"10.1503/cjs.001025","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.001025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E71-E72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Robotic surgery has seen substantial growth over the years and continues to show promise, with recent implementation into orthopedic surgery. There is limited literature available on patient attitudes and comfort level with robotic compared with conventional surgery. We aimed to develop an understanding of patient views on robot-assisted knee replacement to help the development of patient education materials and facilitate successful implementation.
Methods: A qualitative, descriptive methodology was used. Included participants were those who had undergone total knee replacement in the last 5 years. Participants completed an online semistructured interview assessing their past experiences and their fears and assumptions about robotic surgery. An inductive thematic analysis was completed to organize and present the major themes.
Results: Four overarching themes described the areas patients focused on: advancements in surgery, perception of robotic surgery and surgeons, reliability, and patient education materials. Major subthemes included the proven reliability of robots, safety fears, and efficacy. Some participants' fear centred around robot autonomy. Greater comfort with the use of robots would occur if patients were given information about the role of the robot before surgery.
Conclusion: Patient education materials can help alleviate fears and prevent misperceptions about robot-assisted knee replacement. Materials should include themes of surgical advancements and how surgeons interact with these advancements, level of robot autonomy, and the reliability and safety of the robot.
{"title":"The acceptance of robots in the orthopedic joint replacement operating room.","authors":"Lauren Kelenc, Daryl Stephenson, Dianne Bryant, Brent Lanting","doi":"10.1503/cjs.016523","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.016523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic surgery has seen substantial growth over the years and continues to show promise, with recent implementation into orthopedic surgery. There is limited literature available on patient attitudes and comfort level with robotic compared with conventional surgery. We aimed to develop an understanding of patient views on robot-assisted knee replacement to help the development of patient education materials and facilitate successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, descriptive methodology was used. Included participants were those who had undergone total knee replacement in the last 5 years. Participants completed an online semistructured interview assessing their past experiences and their fears and assumptions about robotic surgery. An inductive thematic analysis was completed to organize and present the major themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes described the areas patients focused on: advancements in surgery, perception of robotic surgery and surgeons, reliability, and patient education materials. Major subthemes included the proven reliability of robots, safety fears, and efficacy. Some participants' fear centred around robot autonomy. Greater comfort with the use of robots would occur if patients were given information about the role of the robot before surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient education materials can help alleviate fears and prevent misperceptions about robot-assisted knee replacement. Materials should include themes of surgical advancements and how surgeons interact with these advancements, level of robot autonomy, and the reliability and safety of the robot.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E32-E40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-16Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012023
Abigail Frazer, Silvio Ndoja, Holly S Howe, Supriya Singh
Background: Gender disparities exist in several surgical specialties, particularly in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in gender diversity among orthopedic surgical residents in Canada over the last 20 years.
Methods: We analyzed gender distribution data for orthopedic trainees from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) for 2013-2022 and the Canadian Post-MD Education Registry for 2000-2022 using linear and quadratic regressions.
Results: More male (4.7%) than female medical students (1.9%) applied to an orthopedics program (p < 0.001). The proportion of male applicants entering CaRMS who applied to orthopedics followed a quadratic (U-shaped) distribution over time (p = 0.01). The proportion of female applicants remained unchanged from 2013 to 2022 (p > 0.9). However, for matching results, among the applicants who applied to orthopedic surgery, there was no gender effect (men 56.1% matched, women 50.3% matched; p = 0.3). The proportion of residency spots offered to female applicants remained at around 30%, without significant changes over time (p = 0.1). The number of female orthopedic graduates increased linearly from 2000 to 2021 (p < 0.001), projected to reach gender equalization (at 50%) by 2060. Female residents experienced higher attrition in residency (3.4%) than male residents (2.1%; p = 0.05), and this gender difference is decreasing over time (p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Over 2 decades, women have shown consistently lower rates of application to orthopedic surgery programs than their male colleagues. Women who matched experienced higher attrition rates than men, although this appears to be improving over time.
{"title":"Gender trends in orthopedic surgical residency programs in Canada over 20 years.","authors":"Abigail Frazer, Silvio Ndoja, Holly S Howe, Supriya Singh","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012023","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.012023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparities exist in several surgical specialties, particularly in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the current trends in gender diversity among orthopedic surgical residents in Canada over the last 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed gender distribution data for orthopedic trainees from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) for 2013-2022 and the Canadian Post-MD Education Registry for 2000-2022 using linear and quadratic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More male (4.7%) than female medical students (1.9%) applied to an orthopedics program (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of male applicants entering CaRMS who applied to orthopedics followed a quadratic (U-shaped) distribution over time (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The proportion of female applicants remained unchanged from 2013 to 2022 (<i>p</i> > 0.9). However, for matching results, among the applicants who applied to orthopedic surgery, there was no gender effect (men 56.1% matched, women 50.3% matched; <i>p</i> = 0.3). The proportion of residency spots offered to female applicants remained at around 30%, without significant changes over time (<i>p</i> = 0.1). The number of female orthopedic graduates increased linearly from 2000 to 2021 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), projected to reach gender equalization (at 50%) by 2060. Female residents experienced higher attrition in residency (3.4%) than male residents (2.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.05), and this gender difference is decreasing over time (<i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over 2 decades, women have shown consistently lower rates of application to orthopedic surgery programs than their male colleagues. Women who matched experienced higher attrition rates than men, although this appears to be improving over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E41-E47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-03Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010423
Jordan J Levett, Lior M Elkaim, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou
Background: Robotic technology has been used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for several years. Despite the advances in this field, perspectives surrounding robotic THA are not fully understood. This study aimed to characterize the landscape of robotic THA on social media.
Methods: The Twitter application programming interface was queried from inception to October 2022 for keywords related to THA and robotics. Posts and accounts were extracted and classified using thematic labels. Sentiment analysis was performed on the extracted tweets.
Results: After removal of duplicate posts and illegitimate accounts, a total of 742 tweets from 741 accounts were retrieved. Most posts pertained to raising awareness about robotic THA (n = 340, 45.8%), advertisements for THA robots (n = 204, 27.5%), and personal experiences (n = 138, 18.6%). Research was discussed in 7.0% (n = 52) of posts. Most accounts belonged to patients or caregivers (n = 177, 23.9%), followed by medical centres (n = 175, 23.6%), news outlets (n = 158, 21.3%), and physicians or researchers (n = 101, 13.6%). Most posts discussing personal experience were positive (n = 70, 50.7%) or neutral (n = 39, 28.2%). Presence of media (β = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.1) and tagging (β = 2.1, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8) positively affected user engagement, whereas the presence of a link decreased tweet engagement count by 2.8 (95% CI -5.4 to -0.2).
Conclusion: Topics about robotic THA were discussed in a positive tone on Twitter (rebranded to X in 2023). Posts about raising awareness and advertisements for robotic THA were most prevalent, while research-related posts were limited. Orthopedic surgeons can leverage social media to better understand patient perspectives and glean insight from the robotic surgery industry.
Contexte: La robotique est utilisée depuis plusieurs années pour l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH). Malgré les progrès réalisés dans ce domaine, on connaît encore mal l'opinion qu'elle suscite. La présente étude visait à dresser un tableau de l'ATH robotisée telle qu'on l'aborde sur les réseaux sociaux. MÉTHODES: L'interface de programmation d'application de Twitter a été analysée depuis sa création et jusqu'à octobre 2022 à partir de mots clés reliés à l'ATH et à la robotique. Les messages et les comptes ont été extraits et classés par thèmes et une analyse des sentiments a été effectuée à partir de ces messages. RÉSULTATS: Après élimination des doublons et des faux comptes, nous avons retenu en tout 742 messages provenant de 741 comptes. La plupart visaient à faire connaître l'ATH assistée par robot (n = 340, 45,8 %), faisaient la publicité pour des robots d'ATH (n = 204, 27,5 %) et relataient des expériences personnelles (n = 138, 18,6 %). La recherche était abordée dans 7
{"title":"Perspectives surrounding robotic total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional analysis using natural language processing.","authors":"Jordan J Levett, Lior M Elkaim, David J Zukor, Olga L Huk, John Antoniou","doi":"10.1503/cjs.010423","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.010423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic technology has been used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for several years. Despite the advances in this field, perspectives surrounding robotic THA are not fully understood. This study aimed to characterize the landscape of robotic THA on social media.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Twitter application programming interface was queried from inception to October 2022 for keywords related to THA and robotics. Posts and accounts were extracted and classified using thematic labels. Sentiment analysis was performed on the extracted tweets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After removal of duplicate posts and illegitimate accounts, a total of 742 tweets from 741 accounts were retrieved. Most posts pertained to raising awareness about robotic THA (<i>n</i> = 340, 45.8%), advertisements for THA robots (<i>n</i> = 204, 27.5%), and personal experiences (<i>n</i> = 138, 18.6%). Research was discussed in 7.0% (<i>n</i> = 52) of posts. Most accounts belonged to patients or caregivers (<i>n</i> = 177, 23.9%), followed by medical centres (<i>n</i> = 175, 23.6%), news outlets (<i>n</i> = 158, 21.3%), and physicians or researchers (<i>n</i> = 101, 13.6%). Most posts discussing personal experience were positive (<i>n</i> = 70, 50.7%) or neutral (<i>n</i> = 39, 28.2%). Presence of media (β = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 5.1) and tagging (β = 2.1, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8) positively affected user engagement, whereas the presence of a link decreased tweet engagement count by 2.8 (95% CI -5.4 to -0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Topics about robotic THA were discussed in a positive tone on Twitter (rebranded to X in 2023). Posts about raising awareness and advertisements for robotic THA were most prevalent, while research-related posts were limited. Orthopedic surgeons can leverage social media to better understand patient perspectives and glean insight from the robotic surgery industry.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>La robotique est utilisée depuis plusieurs années pour l'arthroplastie totale de la hanche (ATH). Malgré les progrès réalisés dans ce domaine, on connaît encore mal l'opinion qu'elle suscite. La présente étude visait à dresser un tableau de l'ATH robotisée telle qu'on l'aborde sur les réseaux sociaux. MÉTHODES: L'interface de programmation d'application de Twitter a été analysée depuis sa création et jusqu'à octobre 2022 à partir de mots clés reliés à l'ATH et à la robotique. Les messages et les comptes ont été extraits et classés par thèmes et une analyse des sentiments a été effectuée à partir de ces messages. RÉSULTATS: Après élimination des doublons et des faux comptes, nous avons retenu en tout 742 messages provenant de 741 comptes. La plupart visaient à faire connaître l'ATH assistée par robot (<i>n</i> = 340, 45,8 %), faisaient la publicité pour des robots d'ATH (<i>n</i> = 204, 27,5 %) et relataient des expériences personnelles (<i>n</i> = 138, 18,6 %). La recherche était abordée dans 7","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E10-E16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684921/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-03Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.000124
Alisha Ebrahim, Sarthak Sinha, Ifeoluwa Adedipe, Abeer Ahmad, Madison Amyotte, Lucy Yang, Omar Elsewify, Sukhmeet S Sachal, Frankie O G Fraulin, Vincent A Gabriel, Grace Perez, Aaron Johnston
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because tertiary centres are generally situated at urban sites, it is unclear whether patients in rural areas have the same access to surgical services that patients in urban areas do. We sought to map the North American evidence landscape of how rurality affects access to medically indicated surgeries and identify system-, patient-, and provider-level barriers that preclude urban-comparable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic search adhering to PRISMA for Scoping Reviews methodology across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, encompassing literature from the last 26 years (January 2023). Search terms included "rural population," "health care access," "surgical procedures," and "health disparities." We synthesized our findings using a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13 897 identified studies, we included 71 publications, spanning a wide spectrum of surgical disciplines. Of these, 83% reported diminished and 17% reported accelerated access to surgery, and 30% reported an interaction between rurality with other social determinants of health, particularly age, sex and gender, and race and ethnicity. Of the studies that reported diminished access, top cited reasons included primary and specialist provider density, differences in patients' socioeconomic profiles, and provision of comparable counselling during surgical decisionmaking. Strikingly, a key driver of enhanced surgical access was an absence of specialized medical interventions leading to an overreliance on surgical alternatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whether surgical access was diminished or accelerated, the net impact of rurality was a deviation from guideline-concordant care. A key implication of these findings is that reliance on surgical wait times alone can skew perception of surgical access, advocating for adoption of integrated quality-of-care metrics that better reflect access to comprehensive medical and surgical treatment programs.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>Étant donné que les centres de soins tertiaires se trouvent généralement en milieu urbain, on peut se demander si l'accès aux services chirurgicaux est le même en région rurale qu'en milieu urbain. Nous avons voulu cartographier, preuve à l'appui, l'impact de la ruralité sur l'accès à des chirurgies médicalement indiquées en Amérique du Nord et identifier les obstacles, propres au système, à la patientèle et aux équipes soignantes, qui nuisent à la prestation des soins équivalents à ceux des milieux urbains. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une interrogation systématique (conforme à la Norme de réalisation de revue systématique de la littérature PRISMA) des bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus et Web of Science regroupant la littérature des 26 dernières années (janvier 2023). Les mots clés de langue anglaise utilisés incluaient : « rural population », « health care access », « surgical procedures » et « health dispa
背景:由于三级医疗中心通常位于城市,因此尚不清楚农村地区的患者是否能获得与城市地区患者相同的手术服务。我们试图绘制出北美乡村性如何影响获得医学指征手术的证据景观,并确定系统、患者和提供者层面的障碍,这些障碍阻碍了城市可比的护理。方法:我们按照PRISMA的Scoping Reviews方法对PubMed、MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science进行了系统检索,包括过去26年(2023年1月)的文献。搜索词包括“农村人口”、“医疗保健”、“外科手术”和“健康差距”。我们用叙述的方法综合了我们的发现。结果:在13897项确定的研究中,我们纳入了71篇出版物,涵盖了广泛的外科学科。其中,83%报告手术机会减少,17%报告手术机会加快,30%报告农村与其他健康社会决定因素之间的相互作用,特别是年龄、性别和性别以及种族和族裔。在报告获得机会减少的研究中,最常见的原因包括初级和专业提供者密度,患者社会经济状况的差异,以及在手术决策期间提供可比咨询。引人注目的是,增加手术机会的一个关键驱动因素是缺乏专门的医疗干预,导致过度依赖手术替代方案。结论:无论手术通路是否减少或加速,乡村性的净影响是偏离指南-一致性护理。这些发现的一个关键含义是,仅仅依赖手术等待时间就会扭曲对手术可及性的看法,倡导采用综合护理质量指标,更好地反映综合医疗和手术治疗方案的可及性。Contexte: Etant多恩,德莱斯中心参与tertiaires se trouvent generalement环境班,我们se要求者si l 'acces辅助服务chirurgicaux est le meme en地区瞿rurale环境班。Nous avons voulu cartographier,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病,预防疾病。MÉTHODES: Nous avons procesamd one interrogation system sammatique (conme la Norme de remacize de revue system sammatique de la littsamatrature PRISMA) des bases de donnsametes PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus et Web of Science重组la littsamatrature des 26 derniires annacimes (janvier 2023)。《Les mots claines de english laise utilissamis》包括:“农村人口”、“保健机会”、“外科手术”和“保健差距”。Nous avons synthsamtis没有观察到moyen d'une方法叙述。RÉSULTATS: Des 13897 -最近的薪金,目前的薪金,保留了71份出版物,其中包含了各种各样的薪金和薪金。帕尔米的出版物中,83%的人认为,电子烟和电子烟和电子烟有关,17%的人认为,电子烟和电子烟有关,30%的人认为,电子烟和电子烟有关,电子烟和电子烟有关,性别和类型,种族和种族。例如,将其他因素与其他因素相比较,例如将其他因素与其他因素相比较,例如将其他因素与其他因素相比较,将其他因素与其他因素相比较,例如将其他因素与其他因素相比较,例如将其他因素与其他因素相比较,例如将其他因素与其他因素相比较。做笔记者,两个des principaux影响d 'amelioration de l 'acces辅助参与chirurgicaux是l 'absence d 'interventions 26日专门associees有一个依赖性赋予一个l 'endroit chirurgicales des的解决方案。结论:通过对已获得的电子表格和电子表格和电子表格和其他电子表格的分析,确定了电子表格和其他电子表格的格式。Ces观察indiquent principalement乘缆车依赖性l 'egard des临时工d 'attente en chirurgie单独可以fausser la感知量化一个l 'acces辅助参与chirurgicaux, ce, milite en faveur de l 'adoption de产品德质量de参与中国,refleteraient + fidelement l 'acces des项目de traitements medicaux et chirurgicaux完了。
{"title":"Rurality predisposes departure from gold-standard care, leading to delayed or accelerated access to surgery: insights from a scoping review.","authors":"Alisha Ebrahim, Sarthak Sinha, Ifeoluwa Adedipe, Abeer Ahmad, Madison Amyotte, Lucy Yang, Omar Elsewify, Sukhmeet S Sachal, Frankie O G Fraulin, Vincent A Gabriel, Grace Perez, Aaron Johnston","doi":"10.1503/cjs.000124","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.000124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because tertiary centres are generally situated at urban sites, it is unclear whether patients in rural areas have the same access to surgical services that patients in urban areas do. We sought to map the North American evidence landscape of how rurality affects access to medically indicated surgeries and identify system-, patient-, and provider-level barriers that preclude urban-comparable care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic search adhering to PRISMA for Scoping Reviews methodology across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, encompassing literature from the last 26 years (January 2023). Search terms included \"rural population,\" \"health care access,\" \"surgical procedures,\" and \"health disparities.\" We synthesized our findings using a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13 897 identified studies, we included 71 publications, spanning a wide spectrum of surgical disciplines. Of these, 83% reported diminished and 17% reported accelerated access to surgery, and 30% reported an interaction between rurality with other social determinants of health, particularly age, sex and gender, and race and ethnicity. Of the studies that reported diminished access, top cited reasons included primary and specialist provider density, differences in patients' socioeconomic profiles, and provision of comparable counselling during surgical decisionmaking. Strikingly, a key driver of enhanced surgical access was an absence of specialized medical interventions leading to an overreliance on surgical alternatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whether surgical access was diminished or accelerated, the net impact of rurality was a deviation from guideline-concordant care. A key implication of these findings is that reliance on surgical wait times alone can skew perception of surgical access, advocating for adoption of integrated quality-of-care metrics that better reflect access to comprehensive medical and surgical treatment programs.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>Étant donné que les centres de soins tertiaires se trouvent généralement en milieu urbain, on peut se demander si l'accès aux services chirurgicaux est le même en région rurale qu'en milieu urbain. Nous avons voulu cartographier, preuve à l'appui, l'impact de la ruralité sur l'accès à des chirurgies médicalement indiquées en Amérique du Nord et identifier les obstacles, propres au système, à la patientèle et aux équipes soignantes, qui nuisent à la prestation des soins équivalents à ceux des milieux urbains. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une interrogation systématique (conforme à la Norme de réalisation de revue systématique de la littérature PRISMA) des bases de données PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus et Web of Science regroupant la littérature des 26 dernières années (janvier 2023). Les mots clés de langue anglaise utilisés incluaient : « rural population », « health care access », « surgical procedures » et « health dispa","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E17-E31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684926/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-03Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015223
Bright Huo, Katerina-Maria Kontouli, Daria Manos, Zhaolin Xu, Samuel Chun, John Fris, Alison M R Wallace, Daniel G French
<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to expand eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening beyond age and smoking history. In this study, we sought to assess whether light-or-never-smokers and heavy smokers differ in molecular and immunologic markers based on conventional lung cancer screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of lung cancer cases from 2005 to 2018 at a tertiary Canadian institution. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the rate of molecular mutations (<i>KRAS</i>, <i>EGFR</i>, <i>BRAF</i>, <i>PIK3CA</i>, <i>ALK</i>, and PD-L1 [< 1%, 1%-49%, ≥ 50%]) and survival between light-or-never-smokers and heavy smokers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1156 patients with lung cancer. Overall, 46.4% (National Lung Screening Trial [NLST], <i>n</i> = 536) and 63.3% (Nederlands-Leuvens Long-kanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON], <i>n</i> = 732) of the patients were heavy smokers. Using NELSON criteria, screen-ineligible light-or-never-smokers were more frequently from areas at high risk for radon exposure (<i>n</i> = 175 [41.3%]) than screen-eligible heavy smokers (<i>n</i> = 285 [38.9%]). Light-or-never-smokers were more likely to be <i>EGFR</i>-positive in both NLST (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-1.37; <i>p</i> = 0.008] and NELSON (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.28-1.31; <i>p</i> = 0.002) models. Female light-or-never-smokers were more likely than male light-or-never-smokers to be <i>EGFR</i>-positive in NELSON (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.06-1.12; <i>p</i> = 0.03] but not NLST (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.02-1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.06) models. Light-or-never-smokers were more often <i>PIK3CA</i>-positive using NLST (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.54-2.13; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and NELSON (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.49-1.90; <i>p</i> = 0.001) models. Light-or-never-smokers in the NELSON model were at higher risk of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screen-ineligible light-or-never-smokers had a higher rate of <i>EGFR-</i>and <i>PIK3CA</i>-positive lung cancers than screen-eligible heavy smokers when defined using trial-based lung cancer screening eligibility criteria. Molecular profiling, particularly where targeted therapy is available, should be considered in future studies establishing criteria for lung cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>Il faut élargir les critères d'admissibilité au dépistage du cancer du poumon au-delà de l'âge et des antécédents tabagiques. Dans cette étude, nous avons voulu vérifier s'il y a des différences entre les personnes dont le tabagisme est léger, voire nul (groupe 1) et celles qui fument beaucoup (groupe 2) au plan des marqueurs moléculaires et immunologiques selon les critères classiques de dépistage du cancer du poumon. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une revue rétrospective des cas de cancer du poumon de 2005 à 2018 dans un établissement de soins tertiaires canadien. Nous avons utilisé la régression logistique multivariée pour comparer
背景:有必要将肺癌筛查的资格标准扩大到年龄和吸烟史之外。在这项研究中,我们试图评估轻度或从不吸烟者和重度吸烟者在基于传统肺癌筛查标准的分子和免疫标志物上是否存在差异。方法:我们对加拿大一所高等教育机构2005年至2018年的肺癌病例进行了回顾性研究。我们使用多变量logistic回归比较轻度或从不吸烟者和重度吸烟者的分子突变率(KRAS、EGFR、BRAF、PIK3CA、ALK和PD-L1[< 1%, 1%-49%,≥50%])和生存率。结果:我们纳入了1156例肺癌患者。总体而言,46.4% (National Lung Screening Trial [NLST], n = 536)和63.3% (Nederlands-Leuvens Long-kanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON], n = 732)的患者是重度吸烟者。使用NELSON标准,筛检不合格的轻度吸烟者或从不吸烟者(n = 175[41.3%])比筛检合格的重度吸烟者(n = 285[38.9%])更多地来自氡暴露高风险地区。轻度吸烟者或从不吸烟者在两种NLST中更有可能呈egfr阳性(优势比[OR] 0.79, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.21-1.37;p = 0.008]和NELSON (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.28-1.31;P = 0.002)模型。在NELSON患者中,女性轻度吸烟或从不吸烟比男性轻度吸烟或从不吸烟更容易出现egfr阳性(OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.06-1.12;p = 0.03]但NLST除外(OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.02-1.05;P = 0.06)模型。NLST检测结果显示,轻度或从不吸烟的患者pik3ca呈阳性(OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.54-2.13;p = 0.001)和NELSON (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.49-1.90;P = 0.001)模型。在NELSON模型中,不吸烟或不吸烟的人死亡风险更高。结论:当使用基于试验的肺癌筛查资格标准定义时,不符合筛查条件的轻度吸烟者或从不吸烟者的egfr和pik3ca阳性肺癌的发生率高于符合筛查条件的重度吸烟者。分子谱分析,特别是在有靶向治疗的情况下,应该在未来的研究中考虑建立肺癌筛查标准。背景:我不认为所有的数据都是不可接受的,所以我认为所有的数据都是不可接受的,所以我认为所有的数据都是不可接受的。如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外,如有例外。方法:我们就像一个revue回顾des cas de癌症du poumon 2005 2018在行动etablissement tertiaires法裔加拿大人。研究结果表明,两组患者的生存率均低于对照组(KRAS、EGFR、BRAF、PIK3CA、ALK和PD-L1[< 1%, 1% - 49%,≥50%])。RÉSULTATS: Nous avons包括1156例癌症。总体而言,46.4%(全国肺部筛查试验],n = 536)和63.3%(荷兰- leuvens Longkanker筛查Onderzoek], n = 732)的研究表明,患有先天性肺部疾病的人患有先天性肺部疾病。À第1组,不可受理的au - sys (n = 175[41.3%]);第2组,不可受理的au - sys (n = 285[38.9%])。1组患者合并易感患者être egfr阳性,1组患者NLST (rapport des cotes [RC] 0.79, confy [IC] 0.95, 0.21 - 1.37;p = 0,008), que le mod NELSON (RC 0,79, IC de 95% 0,28-1,31;P = 0.002)。1组,女性患者和易感人群分别为:男性患者和男性患者,分别为:être egfr阳性;p = 0,03),主要非selonle模态NLST (RC = 0,51, IC = 95%, 0,02-1,05;P = 0,06)。Le 1组avwait + tenance être pik3ca阳性selon les modles NLST (RC 1,33, IC de 95% 0,54-2,13;p = 0.001)和NELSON (RC 1,19, IC = 95% 0,49-1,90;P = 0.001)。Selon le mod NELSON,第1组的samtaise暴露了unrisque de mortality it和samtaise。结论:Les人不le tabagisme est分类帐voire nul残余是不容许盟depistage游客现在联合国taux +与德癌症du poumon EGFRet PIK3CA-positifs comparativement辅助gros吸烟者,当我们appliquait Les准则d 'admissibilite盟depistage du癌症du poumon des 2 essais引用。如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,那么就会有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,那么就会有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,那么就会有一种情况是,如果有一种情况是,那么就会有一种情况是,那就是:
{"title":"Screening Criteria Evaluation for Expansion in Pulmonary Neoplasias (SCREEN) II.","authors":"Bright Huo, Katerina-Maria Kontouli, Daria Manos, Zhaolin Xu, Samuel Chun, John Fris, Alison M R Wallace, Daniel G French","doi":"10.1503/cjs.015223","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.015223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to expand eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening beyond age and smoking history. In this study, we sought to assess whether light-or-never-smokers and heavy smokers differ in molecular and immunologic markers based on conventional lung cancer screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of lung cancer cases from 2005 to 2018 at a tertiary Canadian institution. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the rate of molecular mutations (<i>KRAS</i>, <i>EGFR</i>, <i>BRAF</i>, <i>PIK3CA</i>, <i>ALK</i>, and PD-L1 [< 1%, 1%-49%, ≥ 50%]) and survival between light-or-never-smokers and heavy smokers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1156 patients with lung cancer. Overall, 46.4% (National Lung Screening Trial [NLST], <i>n</i> = 536) and 63.3% (Nederlands-Leuvens Long-kanker Screenings Onderzoek [NELSON], <i>n</i> = 732) of the patients were heavy smokers. Using NELSON criteria, screen-ineligible light-or-never-smokers were more frequently from areas at high risk for radon exposure (<i>n</i> = 175 [41.3%]) than screen-eligible heavy smokers (<i>n</i> = 285 [38.9%]). Light-or-never-smokers were more likely to be <i>EGFR</i>-positive in both NLST (odds ratio [OR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-1.37; <i>p</i> = 0.008] and NELSON (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.28-1.31; <i>p</i> = 0.002) models. Female light-or-never-smokers were more likely than male light-or-never-smokers to be <i>EGFR</i>-positive in NELSON (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.06-1.12; <i>p</i> = 0.03] but not NLST (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.02-1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.06) models. Light-or-never-smokers were more often <i>PIK3CA</i>-positive using NLST (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.54-2.13; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and NELSON (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.49-1.90; <i>p</i> = 0.001) models. Light-or-never-smokers in the NELSON model were at higher risk of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Screen-ineligible light-or-never-smokers had a higher rate of <i>EGFR-</i>and <i>PIK3CA</i>-positive lung cancers than screen-eligible heavy smokers when defined using trial-based lung cancer screening eligibility criteria. Molecular profiling, particularly where targeted therapy is available, should be considered in future studies establishing criteria for lung cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Contexte: </strong>Il faut élargir les critères d'admissibilité au dépistage du cancer du poumon au-delà de l'âge et des antécédents tabagiques. Dans cette étude, nous avons voulu vérifier s'il y a des différences entre les personnes dont le tabagisme est léger, voire nul (groupe 1) et celles qui fument beaucoup (groupe 2) au plan des marqueurs moléculaires et immunologiques selon les critères classiques de dépistage du cancer du poumon. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une revue rétrospective des cas de cancer du poumon de 2005 à 2018 dans un établissement de soins tertiaires canadien. Nous avons utilisé la régression logistique multivariée pour comparer ","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E1-E9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684922/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142926765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18Print Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013422
Ali Dergham, Luke Witherspoon, Joseph Y Nashed, Thomas Skinner, Liam Power, John Mahoney, Brian Blew, Jeffrey T Warren
Background: The effect of weekend admission and surgery on patient morbidity and mortality has been studied in many settings and has been shown to lead to worse outcomes. Several studies have sought to determine whether there is a weekend effect in kidney transplantation specifically, but a clear effect on outcomes and graft survival has not been established.
Methods: We analyzed data from all deceased-donor organ procurements and cadaveric kidney transplants occurring during the 5-year period between Apr. 1, 2013, and Dec. 31, 2017, included in the database of the Trillium Gift of Life Network, Ontario's organ and tissue donation agency.
Results: A total of 1116 deceased donor nephrectomies (DNs) and 1858 recipient procedures were performed in Ontario during the study period. The overall rate of after-hours DNs on weekdays was significantly greater than during working hours (23.1/30 d v. 15.4/30 d, p < 0.001). Donations after neurological determination of death were more frequent during weekday working hours (22.8/30 d) than after hours on weekdays (17.3/30 d, p < 0.001) or weekends (16.3/30 d, p < 0.001), whereas donations after cardiac death were significantly more frequent after hours on weekdays than during working hours (10.3/30 d v. 7.7/30 d, p = 0.021). On weekdays, mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was significantly longer after hours than during working hours (40.75 ± 12.26 min v. 38.52 ± 11.92 min, p = 0.017). Similarly, mean WIT was longer after hours than during working hours on weekends (40.23 ± 12.48 min v. 38.59 ± 11.91 min, p = 0.015).
Conclusion: Kidney transplantations occurred more frequently after hours and were associated with increased WIT. Further study is needed across multiple Canadian centres to better understand the temporal patterns of kidney transplantation and implications for patients, providers, and health care systems.
背景:周末住院和手术对患者发病率和死亡率的影响已经在许多情况下进行了研究,并显示会导致更糟糕的结果。一些研究试图确定在肾移植中是否存在特异性的周末效应,但尚未确定对预后和移植物存活的明确影响。方法:我们分析了2013年4月1日至2017年12月31日期间发生的所有死者供体器官采购和尸体肾移植的数据,这些数据纳入安大略省器官和组织捐赠机构Trillium Gift of Life Network的数据库。结果:在研究期间,安大略省共进行了1116例已故供体肾切除术(dn)和1858例受体手术。工作日下班后dn的总体发生率显著高于工作时间(23.1/30 d vs . 15.4/30 d, p < 0.001)。神经系统死亡后的捐赠在工作日工作时间(22.8/30 d)高于工作日下班后(17.3/30 d, p < 0.001)或周末(16.3/30 d, p < 0.001),而心脏死亡后的捐赠在工作日下班后明显高于工作时间(10.3/30 d vs . 7.7/30 d, p = 0.021)。工作日下班后的平均热缺血时间(WIT)明显长于上班时间(40.75±12.26 min vs . 38.52±11.92 min, p = 0.017)。同样,下班后的平均WIT比周末工作时间更长(40.23±12.48 min vs . 38.59±11.91 min, p = 0.015)。结论:肾移植在术后发生的频率更高,且与WIT增加有关。为了更好地了解肾移植的时间模式以及对患者、提供者和卫生保健系统的影响,需要在多个加拿大中心进行进一步的研究。
{"title":"Analyzing the temporal trends of kidney transplantation surgeries and their impact on warm and cold ischemia time in a Canadian setting.","authors":"Ali Dergham, Luke Witherspoon, Joseph Y Nashed, Thomas Skinner, Liam Power, John Mahoney, Brian Blew, Jeffrey T Warren","doi":"10.1503/cjs.013422","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.013422","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of weekend admission and surgery on patient morbidity and mortality has been studied in many settings and has been shown to lead to worse outcomes. Several studies have sought to determine whether there is a weekend effect in kidney transplantation specifically, but a clear effect on outcomes and graft survival has not been established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from all deceased-donor organ procurements and cadaveric kidney transplants occurring during the 5-year period between Apr. 1, 2013, and Dec. 31, 2017, included in the database of the Trillium Gift of Life Network, Ontario's organ and tissue donation agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1116 deceased donor nephrectomies (DNs) and 1858 recipient procedures were performed in Ontario during the study period. The overall rate of after-hours DNs on weekdays was significantly greater than during working hours (23.1/30 d v. 15.4/30 d, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Donations after neurological determination of death were more frequent during weekday working hours (22.8/30 d) than after hours on weekdays (17.3/30 d, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or weekends (16.3/30 d, <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas donations after cardiac death were significantly more frequent after hours on weekdays than during working hours (10.3/30 d v. 7.7/30 d, <i>p</i> = 0.021). On weekdays, mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was significantly longer after hours than during working hours (40.75 ± 12.26 min v. 38.52 ± 11.92 min, <i>p</i> = 0.017). Similarly, mean WIT was longer after hours than during working hours on weekends (40.23 ± 12.48 min v. 38.59 ± 11.91 min, <i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kidney transplantations occurred more frequently after hours and were associated with increased WIT. Further study is needed across multiple Canadian centres to better understand the temporal patterns of kidney transplantation and implications for patients, providers, and health care systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 6","pages":"E406-E415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18Print Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015224
Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey
{"title":"La contribution des militaires au paysage chirurgical canadien.","authors":"Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey","doi":"10.1503/cjs.015224","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.015224","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 6","pages":"E419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142853006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18Print Date: 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015324
{"title":"Correction to: \"Incidence and timing of postoperative complications after total hip and knee arthroplasty\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1503/cjs.015324","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.015324","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 6","pages":"E420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143000631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}