Pub Date : 2024-05-10Print Date: 2024-05-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002124
Jonathan L Meakins, Liane S Feldman
SummaryIn 1923, just over 100 years ago, Edward William Archibald was appointed the first chair of surgery in McGill University's Faculty of Medicine. This milestone provides an opportunity to reflect on where the department has come from and how it has progressed to the present day. Although the size, breadth, and diversity of the department members have changed notably over the century, the core values of innovative clinical care, research, and education established a century ago continue to this day. To reflect his values, the Archibald Chair of Surgery was established in 1990 and is today held by the department chair.
{"title":"A history of the McGill Department of Surgery: the first 100 years (1923-2023).","authors":"Jonathan L Meakins, Liane S Feldman","doi":"10.1503/cjs.002124","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.002124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SummaryIn 1923, just over 100 years ago, Edward William Archibald was appointed the first chair of surgery in McGill University's Faculty of Medicine. This milestone provides an opportunity to reflect on where the department has come from and how it has progressed to the present day. Although the size, breadth, and diversity of the department members have changed notably over the century, the core values of innovative clinical care, research, and education established a century ago continue to this day. To reflect his values, the Archibald Chair of Surgery was established in 1990 and is today held by the department chair.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E216-E227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140903915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-10Print Date: 2024-05-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013723
Johnathan R Lex, Daniel Pincus, J Michael Paterson, Jessica Widdifield, Harman Chaudhry, Rob Fowler, Gillian Hawker, Bheeshma Ravi
Background: Immigrants and refugees face unique challenges navigating the health care system to manage severe arthritis, because of unfamiliarity, lack of awareness of surgical options, or access. The purpose of this study was to assess total knee arthroplasty (TKA) uptake, surgical outcomes, and hospital utilization among immigrants and refugees compared with Canadian-born patients.
Methods: We included all adults undergoing primary TKA from January 2011 to December 2020 in Ontario. Cohorts were defined as Canadian-born or immigrants and refugees. We assessed change in yearly TKA utilization for trend. We compared differences in 1-year revision, infection rates, 30-day venous thromboembolism (VTE), presentation to emergency department, and hospital readmission between matched Canadian-born and immigrant and refugee groups.
Results: We included 158 031 TKA procedures. A total of 11 973 (7.6%) patients were in the immigrant and refugee group, and 146 058 (92.4%) patients were in the Canadian-born group. The proportion of TKAs in Ontario performed among immigrants and refugees nearly doubled over the 10-year study period (p < 0.001). After matching, immigrants were at relatively lower risk of 1-year revision (0.9% v. 1.6%, p < 0.001), infection (p < 0.001), death (p = 0.004), and surgical complications (p < 0.001). No differences were observed in rates of 30-day VTE or length of hospital stay. Immigrants were more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation (p < 0.001) and less likely to present to the emergency department (p < 0.001) than Canadian-born patients.
Conclusion: Compared with Canadian-born patients, immigrants and refugees have favourable surgical outcomes and similar rates of resource utilization after TKA. We observed an underutilization of these procedures in Ontario relative to their proportion of the population. This may reflect differences in perceptions of chronic pain or barriers accessing arthroplasty.
{"title":"Association between immigration status and total knee arthroplasty outcomes in Ontario, Canada: a population-based matched cohort study.","authors":"Johnathan R Lex, Daniel Pincus, J Michael Paterson, Jessica Widdifield, Harman Chaudhry, Rob Fowler, Gillian Hawker, Bheeshma Ravi","doi":"10.1503/cjs.013723","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.013723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immigrants and refugees face unique challenges navigating the health care system to manage severe arthritis, because of unfamiliarity, lack of awareness of surgical options, or access. The purpose of this study was to assess total knee arthroplasty (TKA) uptake, surgical outcomes, and hospital utilization among immigrants and refugees compared with Canadian-born patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all adults undergoing primary TKA from January 2011 to December 2020 in Ontario. Cohorts were defined as Canadian-born or immigrants and refugees. We assessed change in yearly TKA utilization for trend. We compared differences in 1-year revision, infection rates, 30-day venous thromboembolism (VTE), presentation to emergency department, and hospital readmission between matched Canadian-born and immigrant and refugee groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 158 031 TKA procedures. A total of 11 973 (7.6%) patients were in the immigrant and refugee group, and 146 058 (92.4%) patients were in the Canadian-born group. The proportion of TKAs in Ontario performed among immigrants and refugees nearly doubled over the 10-year study period (<i>p</i> < 0.001). After matching, immigrants were at relatively lower risk of 1-year revision (0.9% v. 1.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), infection (<i>p</i> < 0.001), death (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and surgical complications (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No differences were observed in rates of 30-day VTE or length of hospital stay. Immigrants were more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and less likely to present to the emergency department (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than Canadian-born patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with Canadian-born patients, immigrants and refugees have favourable surgical outcomes and similar rates of resource utilization after TKA. We observed an underutilization of these procedures in Ontario relative to their proportion of the population. This may reflect differences in perceptions of chronic pain or barriers accessing arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E228-E235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140903920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Call to modernize measurement of gender, race, and ethnicity.","authors":"Kaitlyn G Harding, A J Lowik, Sam M Wiseman","doi":"10.1503/cjs.99057-l","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.99057-l","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068421/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sunil V Patel, Vanessa Wiseman, Lisa Zhang, Shaila J Merchant, Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda, P Hugh MacDonald
Background: Although robotic surgery has several advantages over other minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for rectal cancer surgery, the uptake in Canada has been limited owing to a perceived increase in cost and lack of training. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of access to robotic surgery in a Canadian setting.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving consecutive adults undergoing surgical resection for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2020. The primary exposure was access to robotic surgery. Outcomes included MIS utilization, short-term outcomes, total cost of care, and quality of surgical resection. We completed univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: We included 171 individuals in this cohort study (85 in the prerobotic period and 86 in the robotic period). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. A higher proportion of individuals underwent successful MIS in the robotic phase (86% v. 46%, p < 0.001). Other benefits included a shorter mean length of hospital stay (5.1 d v. 9.2 d, p < 0.001). The quality of surgical resection was similar between groups. The total cost of care was $16 746 in the robotic period and $18 808 in the prerobotic period (mean difference -$1262, 95% confidence interval -$4308 to $1783; p = 0.4).
Conclusion: Access to robotic rectal cancer surgery increased successful completion of MIS and shortened hospital stay, with a similar total cost of care. Robotic rectal cancer surgery can enhance patient outcomes in the Canadian setting.
背景:尽管在直肠癌手术中,机器人手术与其他微创手术(MIS)技术相比具有多项优势,但由于成本增加和缺乏培训,加拿大对机器人手术的接受度一直有限。本研究的目的是确定在加拿大使用机器人手术的影响:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,涉及 2017 年至 2020 年间接受直肠癌手术切除的连续成人。主要暴露因素是机器人手术的可及性。研究结果包括 MIS 使用情况、短期疗效、总护理成本和手术切除质量。我们完成了单变量和多变量分析:我们在这项队列研究中纳入了 171 人(机器人手术前 85 人,机器人手术后 86 人)。两组患者的基线特征相似。机器人手术阶段成功接受 MIS 的比例更高(86% 对 46%,P < 0.001)。其他优势还包括平均住院时间更短(5.1 d 对 9.2 d,p < 0.001)。两组的手术切除质量相似。机器人手术期间的总治疗费用为16 746美元,而机器人手术前为18 808美元(平均差异为-1262美元,95%置信区间为-4308美元至1783美元;P = 0.4):结论:机器人直肠癌手术提高了 MIS 的成功率,缩短了住院时间,但总护理成本相似。在加拿大,机器人直肠癌手术可提高患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"The impact of robotic rectal cancer surgery at a Canadian regional cancer centre: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sunil V Patel, Vanessa Wiseman, Lisa Zhang, Shaila J Merchant, Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda, P Hugh MacDonald","doi":"10.1503/cjs.002523","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.002523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although robotic surgery has several advantages over other minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques for rectal cancer surgery, the uptake in Canada has been limited owing to a perceived increase in cost and lack of training. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of access to robotic surgery in a Canadian setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving consecutive adults undergoing surgical resection for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2020. The primary exposure was access to robotic surgery. Outcomes included MIS utilization, short-term outcomes, total cost of care, and quality of surgical resection. We completed univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 171 individuals in this cohort study (85 in the prerobotic period and 86 in the robotic period). The 2 groups had similar baseline characteristics. A higher proportion of individuals underwent successful MIS in the robotic phase (86% v. 46%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Other benefits included a shorter mean length of hospital stay (5.1 d v. 9.2 d, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The quality of surgical resection was similar between groups. The total cost of care was $16 746 in the robotic period and $18 808 in the prerobotic period (mean difference -$1262, 95% confidence interval -$4308 to $1783; <i>p</i> = 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access to robotic rectal cancer surgery increased successful completion of MIS and shortened hospital stay, with a similar total cost of care. Robotic rectal cancer surgery can enhance patient outcomes in the Canadian setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E206-E213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068423/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ghader Jamjoum, Thea Araji, Diana Nguyen, Ari N Meguerditchian
Background: Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) has historically been associated with substantial morbidity. The objective of this study was to obtain contemporary ILND morbidity rates and to identify potentially preventable risk factors.
Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of medical records for all superficial, deep, and combination groin dissections performed at a single, high-volume academic centre between January 2007 and December 2020. We collected data points for patient, disease, and surgery characteristics, and cancer outcomes. The outcome of interest was any complication within 30 days of surgery. Complications included wound infection, wound necrosis or disruption, seroma, drainage procedure, hematoma, and lymphedema. We performed multivariate logistic regression using SAS version 9.4.
Results: We identified 139 patients having undergone 89 superficial, 12 deep, and 38 combined dissection types, respectively. Melanoma accounted for 84.9% of cases. Of these patients, 56.1% had an adverse postoperative event within 30 days. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, p < 0.01) and number of positive lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, p = 0.05) were associated with more complications. Patients with deep dissection showed a lower likelihood of complications than those with superficial dissection (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Complication rates after ILND remain high. We identified a number of risk factors, providing opportunities for better selection and prevention.
{"title":"Predictors of complication after groin dissection: a single-centre experience.","authors":"Ghader Jamjoum, Thea Araji, Diana Nguyen, Ari N Meguerditchian","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.012022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND) has historically been associated with substantial morbidity. The objective of this study was to obtain contemporary ILND morbidity rates and to identify potentially preventable risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a retrospective review of medical records for all superficial, deep, and combination groin dissections performed at a single, high-volume academic centre between January 2007 and December 2020. We collected data points for patient, disease, and surgery characteristics, and cancer outcomes. The outcome of interest was any complication within 30 days of surgery. Complications included wound infection, wound necrosis or disruption, seroma, drainage procedure, hematoma, and lymphedema. We performed multivariate logistic regression using SAS version 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 139 patients having undergone 89 superficial, 12 deep, and 38 combined dissection types, respectively. Melanoma accounted for 84.9% of cases. Of these patients, 56.1% had an adverse postoperative event within 30 days. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.07, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and number of positive lymph nodes harvested (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.50, <i>p</i> = 0.05) were associated with more complications. Patients with deep dissection showed a lower likelihood of complications than those with superficial dissection (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complication rates after ILND remain high. We identified a number of risk factors, providing opportunities for better selection and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E198-E205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shervin Taslimi, Susan B Brogly, Wenbin Li, Jillian Rodger, Ekkehard M Kasper, Douglas J Cook, Ron Levy
Background: The evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of involving neurosurgical residents in the care of patients who undergo neurosurgical procedures is heterogeneous. We assessed the effect of neurosurgical residency programs on the outcomes of such patients in a large single-payer public health care system.
Methods: Ten population-based cohorts of adult patients in Ontario who received neurosurgical care from 2013 to 2017 were identified on the basis of procedural codes, and the cohorts were followed in administrative health data sources. Patient outcomes by the status of the treating hospital (with or without a neurosurgical residency program) within each cohort were compared with models adjusted for a priori confounders and with adjusted multilevel models (MLMs) to also account for hospital-level factors.
Results: A total of 46 608 neurosurgical procedures were included. Operative time was 8%-30% longer in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs in 9 out of 10 cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was lower in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs for aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44), cerebrospinal fluid shunting (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79), intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and posterior lumbar decompression (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.65) in adjusted models. The mortality rates remained significantly different only for aneurysm repair (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69) and cerebrospinal shunting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85) in MLMs. Length of stay was mostly shorter in hospitals with neurosurgical residents, but this finding did not persist in MLMs. Thirty-day reoperation rates did not differ between hospital types in MLMs. For 30-day readmission rates, only extracerebral hematoma decompression was significant in MLMs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87).
Conclusion: Hospitals with neurosurgical residents had longer operative times with similar to better outcomes. Most, but not all, of the differences between hospitals with and without residency programs were explained by hospital-level variables rather than direct effects of residents.
背景:有关神经外科住院医师参与神经外科手术患者护理的利弊证据不一。我们评估了神经外科住院医师项目对大型单方付费公共医疗系统中此类患者治疗效果的影响:根据程序代码确定了安大略省在 2013 年至 2017 年期间接受神经外科治疗的 10 个基于人群的成年患者队列,并在行政健康数据源中对这些队列进行了跟踪。在每个队列中,根据治疗医院的状况(有无神经外科住院医师培训计划)对患者的治疗结果进行了比较,并使用先验混杂因素调整模型和调整后的多层次模型(MLM)对医院层面的因素进行了考虑:结果:共纳入 46 608 例神经外科手术。在10个队列中的9个队列中,有神经外科住院医师项目的医院的手术时间延长了8%-30%。在调整后的模型中,有神经外科住院医师项目的医院在动脉瘤修补术(几率比 [OR] 0.30,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.20-0.44)、脑脊液分流术(OR 0.52,95% CI 0.34-0.79)、脑内出血排空术(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.52-0.84)和腰椎后路减压术(OR 0.32,95% CI 0.15-0.65)方面的三十天死亡率较低。只有动脉瘤修补术(OR 0.19,95% CI 0.05-0.69)和脑脊液分流术(OR 0.42,95% CI 0.21-0.85)的死亡率在多器官功能障碍患者中仍有明显差异。有神经外科住院医师的医院的住院时间大多较短,但这一结果在多层面医院中并不存在。在多层级医院中,不同类型医院的 30 天再手术率没有差异。就30天再入院率而言,只有脑外血肿减压术在多层面医院中具有显著性差异(OR 1.41,95% CI 1.07-1.87):结论:有神经外科住院医师的医院手术时间更长,但疗效相似甚至更好。有住院医师项目的医院和没有住院医师项目的医院之间的差异大部分(但并非全部)是由医院层面的变量而非住院医师的直接影响造成的。
{"title":"Effect of neurosurgical residency programs on neurosurgical patient outcomes in a single health care system: a cohort study.","authors":"Shervin Taslimi, Susan B Brogly, Wenbin Li, Jillian Rodger, Ekkehard M Kasper, Douglas J Cook, Ron Levy","doi":"10.1503/cjs.008522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of involving neurosurgical residents in the care of patients who undergo neurosurgical procedures is heterogeneous. We assessed the effect of neurosurgical residency programs on the outcomes of such patients in a large single-payer public health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten population-based cohorts of adult patients in Ontario who received neurosurgical care from 2013 to 2017 were identified on the basis of procedural codes, and the cohorts were followed in administrative health data sources. Patient outcomes by the status of the treating hospital (with or without a neurosurgical residency program) within each cohort were compared with models adjusted for a priori confounders and with adjusted multilevel models (MLMs) to also account for hospital-level factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 608 neurosurgical procedures were included. Operative time was 8%-30% longer in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs in 9 out of 10 cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was lower in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs for aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44), cerebrospinal fluid shunting (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79), intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and posterior lumbar decompression (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.65) in adjusted models. The mortality rates remained significantly different only for aneurysm repair (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69) and cerebrospinal shunting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85) in MLMs. Length of stay was mostly shorter in hospitals with neurosurgical residents, but this finding did not persist in MLMs. Thirty-day reoperation rates did not differ between hospital types in MLMs. For 30-day readmission rates, only extracerebral hematoma decompression was significant in MLMs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitals with neurosurgical residents had longer operative times with similar to better outcomes. Most, but not all, of the differences between hospitals with and without residency programs were explained by hospital-level variables rather than direct effects of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E188-E197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068422/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140853950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26Print Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003823
Yifu Huang, Jenna-Lynn B Senger, Lisa Korus, Rhonda J Rosychuk
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting females in Canada, and about half of females with breast cancer are treated with mastectomy. We sought to evaluate geographic variation in breast reconstruction surgery in Alberta, Canada.
Methods: Using linked population-based administrative databases, we extracted data on all Alberta females aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with mastectomy during 2004-2017. Analyses included regression modelling of odds of reconstruction at 1 year and a spatial scan to identify geographic clusters of lower numbers of reconstruction.
Results: A total of 16 198 females diagnosed with breast cancer were treated with a mastectomy, and 1932 (11.9%) had reconstruction within 1 year postmastectomy. Those with reconstruction were more likely to be younger (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 16.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.7-20.3; aged 21-44 yr v. ≥ 65 yr) and were less likely to be from lower-income neighbourhoods. They were more likely to have at least 1 comorbidity and were more likely to have advanced stages of cancer and to require chemotherapy (adjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.65) or radiotherapy after mastectomy (adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.87) than females without reconstruction. We identified rural northern and southeastern clusters with frequencies of reconstruction that were 69.6% and 41.6% of what was expected, respectively.
Conclusion: We found an overall postmastectomy rate of breast reconstruction of 11.9%, and we identified geographic variation. Predictors of reconstruction in Alberta were similar to those previously described in the literature, specifically with patients in rural communities having lower rates of reconstruction than their urban counterparts. These results suggest that further interventions are required to identify the specific barriers to reconstruction within rural communities and to create strategies to ensure equitable access to all residents.
背景:乳腺癌是加拿大女性最常见的癌症,约有一半的女性乳腺癌患者接受乳房切除术。我们试图评估加拿大艾伯塔省乳房再造手术的地域差异:我们使用基于人口的关联行政数据库,提取了 2004-2017 年间阿尔伯塔省所有 18 岁及以上女性的数据,这些女性被诊断为乳腺癌并接受了乳房切除术。分析包括 1 年后重建几率的回归建模和空间扫描,以确定重建数量较少的地理集群:共有16 198名确诊为乳腺癌的女性接受了乳房切除术,其中1932人(11.9%)在切除术后1年内进行了乳房再造。接受乳房再造术的女性更年轻(调整后的几率比[OR]16.7,95%置信区间[CI]13.7-20.3;年龄21-44岁v.≥65岁),来自低收入社区的可能性较小。与未进行乳房重建的女性相比,她们更有可能患有至少一种并发症,更有可能患有晚期癌症,并在乳房切除术后需要化疗(调整后 OR 为 0.55,95% CI 为 0.47-0.65)或放疗(调整后 OR 为 0.59,95% CI 为 0.39-0.87)。我们发现,北部和东南部农村集群的重建率分别为预期的 69.6% 和 41.6%:结论:我们发现乳房切除术后乳房再造的总体比例为 11.9%,而且我们还发现了地域差异。阿尔伯塔省的重建预测因素与之前文献中描述的相似,特别是农村社区患者的重建率低于城市患者。这些结果表明,需要采取进一步的干预措施,以确定农村社区重建的具体障碍,并制定战略,确保所有居民都能公平地获得乳房重建的机会。
{"title":"Geographic variation in breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy for females with breast cancer in Alberta, Canada.","authors":"Yifu Huang, Jenna-Lynn B Senger, Lisa Korus, Rhonda J Rosychuk","doi":"10.1503/cjs.003823","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting females in Canada, and about half of females with breast cancer are treated with mastectomy. We sought to evaluate geographic variation in breast reconstruction surgery in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using linked population-based administrative databases, we extracted data on all Alberta females aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with mastectomy during 2004-2017. Analyses included regression modelling of odds of reconstruction at 1 year and a spatial scan to identify geographic clusters of lower numbers of reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 198 females diagnosed with breast cancer were treated with a mastectomy, and 1932 (11.9%) had reconstruction within 1 year postmastectomy. Those with reconstruction were more likely to be younger (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 16.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.7-20.3; aged 21-44 yr v. ≥ 65 yr) and were less likely to be from lower-income neighbourhoods. They were more likely to have at least 1 comorbidity and were more likely to have advanced stages of cancer and to require chemotherapy (adjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.65) or radiotherapy after mastectomy (adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.87) than females without reconstruction. We identified rural northern and southeastern clusters with frequencies of reconstruction that were 69.6% and 41.6% of what was expected, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an overall postmastectomy rate of breast reconstruction of 11.9%, and we identified geographic variation. Predictors of reconstruction in Alberta were similar to those previously described in the literature, specifically with patients in rural communities having lower rates of reconstruction than their urban counterparts. These results suggest that further interventions are required to identify the specific barriers to reconstruction within rural communities and to create strategies to ensure equitable access to all residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 2","pages":"E172-E182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11052580/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26Print Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004424
Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey, Mohit Bhandari, S Morad Hameed
{"title":"Rendement élevé dans le domaine chirurgical.","authors":"Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey, Mohit Bhandari, S Morad Hameed","doi":"10.1503/cjs.004424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004424","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 2","pages":"E185-E187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11052578/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140848263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-26Print Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004224
Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey, Mohit Bhandari, S Morad Hameed
{"title":"High performance in surgery.","authors":"Chad G Ball, Edward J Harvey, Mohit Bhandari, S Morad Hameed","doi":"10.1503/cjs.004224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004224","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 2","pages":"E183-E184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11052577/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}