Pub Date : 2025-03-19Print Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015923
Shannon M Ruzycki, Kenna Kelly-Turner, Kevin A Hildebrand, Natalie L Yanchar
Background: Strategies to address inequities, bias, and discrimination that disadvantage Canadian physicians from marginalized groups are urgently needed. We describe a multilevel needs assessment of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in 2 departments of surgery that focused on identifying evidence-based interventions.
Methods: We invited members of the departments of surgery at the University of Calgary and the University of Saskatchewan to complete the Diversity Engagement Survey (DES), a 22-item instrument designed to understand workplace engagement and inclusion among physicians, with higher scores indicating greater engagement and inclusion. Leaders completed a Leadership EDI Readiness Assessment to understand their own barriers to EDI work and an Organizational EDI Readiness Assessment to understand structures for EDI in their division. Leaders were provided resources and interventions to address the identified gaps in these assessments.
Results: The most common organizational gaps in structures for EDI work in surgical divisions and training programs (n = 34, 37.4%) were in community outreach and measurement and reporting. Surgeons who identified as cisgender men (n = 101) felt more engaged and included than those who identified as cisgender women (n = 43; 3.81 [standard deviation (SD) 0.73] v. 3.51 [SD 0.78]; p = 0.04). White cisgender men (n = 66) had the highest feelings of engagement and inclusion (mean 3.95 [SD 0.62]). Participating surgical sections and training programs were directed to evidence-informed initiatives to improve community outreach and measurement and reporting to address EDI in their settings.
Conclusion: Our findings support that gender and racial or ethnic identities influence the workplace experiences of surgeons in Canada. A multilevel approach to EDI work in surgical departments can direct leaders to areas for intervention.
背景:迫切需要解决加拿大边缘化群体医生的不公平、偏见和歧视问题的策略。我们对两个外科部门的公平性、多样性和包容性(EDI)进行了多层次需求评估,重点是确定循证干预措施。方法:我们邀请卡尔加里大学(University of Calgary)和萨斯喀彻温大学(University of Saskatchewan)外科部门的成员完成多样性参与调查(DES),这是一项包含22个项目的工具,旨在了解医生的工作场所参与度和包容性,得分越高表明参与度和包容性越高。领导者完成了领导EDI准备评估,以了解他们自己的EDI工作障碍,并完成了组织EDI准备评估,以了解他们部门的EDI结构。向领导人提供了资源和干预措施,以解决这些评估中发现的差距。结果:在外科部门和培训项目中,EDI工作最常见的组织结构差距(n = 34, 37.4%)是社区外展和测量和报告。被认定为顺性男性的外科医生(n = 101)比被认定为顺性女性的外科医生(n = 43;3.81[标准差(SD) 0.73] v. 3.51 [SD 0.78];P = 0.04)。白人顺性别男性(n = 66)的投入感和包容感最高(平均3.95 [SD 0.62])。参与的外科部门和培训项目被导向循证倡议,以改善社区外展、测量和报告,以解决其环境中的EDI问题。结论:我们的研究结果支持性别和种族或民族身份影响加拿大外科医生的工作经历。外科部门EDI工作的多层次方法可以指导领导进行干预的领域。
{"title":"Tying measurement to action in equity, diversity, and inclusion work in academic surgical departments.","authors":"Shannon M Ruzycki, Kenna Kelly-Turner, Kevin A Hildebrand, Natalie L Yanchar","doi":"10.1503/cjs.015923","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.015923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strategies to address inequities, bias, and discrimination that disadvantage Canadian physicians from marginalized groups are urgently needed. We describe a multilevel needs assessment of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in 2 departments of surgery that focused on identifying evidence-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited members of the departments of surgery at the University of Calgary and the University of Saskatchewan to complete the Diversity Engagement Survey (DES), a 22-item instrument designed to understand workplace engagement and inclusion among physicians, with higher scores indicating greater engagement and inclusion. Leaders completed a Leadership EDI Readiness Assessment to understand their own barriers to EDI work and an Organizational EDI Readiness Assessment to understand structures for EDI in their division. Leaders were provided resources and interventions to address the identified gaps in these assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common organizational gaps in structures for EDI work in surgical divisions and training programs (<i>n</i> = 34, 37.4%) were in community outreach and measurement and reporting. Surgeons who identified as cisgender men (<i>n</i> = 101) felt more engaged and included than those who identified as cisgender women (<i>n</i> = 43; 3.81 [standard deviation (SD) 0.73] v. 3.51 [SD 0.78]; <i>p</i> = 0.04). White cisgender men (<i>n</i> = 66) had the highest feelings of engagement and inclusion (mean 3.95 [SD 0.62]). Participating surgical sections and training programs were directed to evidence-informed initiatives to improve community outreach and measurement and reporting to address EDI in their settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support that gender and racial or ethnic identities influence the workplace experiences of surgeons in Canada. A multilevel approach to EDI work in surgical departments can direct leaders to areas for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E108-E116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928076/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143662572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05Print Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004823
Betty Wen, Joshua Bhudial, Anise Barton
SummaryWithin the field of global surgery, partnerships between low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) are often used to improve surgical capacity and enhance surgical training. Similarly, medical rounds are common in postgraduate medical training, although joint rounds between LMICs and HICs have not been widely used. Over 1 year, 6 online joint education rounds were held for general surgery residents at the University of British Columbia and the University of Guyana. Rounds comprised resident-led case-based presentations on a surgical subspecialty topic. These rounds were evaluated by residents through an online survey and were found to be valuable and relevant to their training, with mutual and differential benefits to Canadian and Guyanese residents. This project demonstrated that joint rounds are a meaningful method to partner surgical residency programs and can provide another tool for implementation of global surgery.
{"title":"Joint rounds as a method to partner surgical residency programs and enhance global surgical training: the Guyana-UBC joint rounds project.","authors":"Betty Wen, Joshua Bhudial, Anise Barton","doi":"10.1503/cjs.004823","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.004823","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SummaryWithin the field of global surgery, partnerships between low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) are often used to improve surgical capacity and enhance surgical training. Similarly, medical rounds are common in postgraduate medical training, although joint rounds between LMICs and HICs have not been widely used. Over 1 year, 6 online joint education rounds were held for general surgery residents at the University of British Columbia and the University of Guyana. Rounds comprised resident-led case-based presentations on a surgical subspecialty topic. These rounds were evaluated by residents through an online survey and were found to be valuable and relevant to their training, with mutual and differential benefits to Canadian and Guyanese residents. This project demonstrated that joint rounds are a meaningful method to partner surgical residency programs and can provide another tool for implementation of global surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E83-E86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908786/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143566087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05Print Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010424
Scott Harrison, Jimmy Ro, Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, Alan Getgood, Robert Giffin, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits, Ryan M Degen
Background: Ambulatory surgery centres are becoming an attractive alternative to hospital-based outpatient departments; however, limited data exist on their cost efficacy in a publicly funded health care model. In this study, we aimed to compare costs for ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre and a hospital outpatient department.
Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), or hip arthroscopy between January 2020 and August 2022. We collected demographic characteristics, procedural costs, and procedural data. We used 2-sample t tests to compare care-related costs between groups treated in an ambulatory surgery centre and hospital outpatient department.
Results: After controlling for age and concomitant procedures, we included a total of 132 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or rotator cuff repair in an ambulatory surgery centre had significantly shorter duration of total operating room time, and procedural duration was equivocal (p > 0.1) between sites. Procedure time for ACLR was significantly shorter in the group treated in an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group treated in a hospital outpatient department (p = 0.01). The total case costs for the ambulatory surgery centre were significantly lower for hip arthroscopy ($3543, standard deviation (SD) $365 v. $6209, SD $681; p < 0.05), rotator cuff repair ($4259, SD $934 v. $5786, SD $934; p < 0.05), and ACLR ($3136, SD $459 v. $4821, SD $1511; p < 0.05), despite a lack of differences in associated disposable implant costs for ACLR and rotator cuff repair (p > 0.1). Material costs were significantly lower in the group receiving hip arthroscopy at an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group receiving the same procedure at a hospital outpatient department (p < 0.05). There were no differences in immediate 6-week postoperative care-associated costs between groups (p > 0.4).
Conclusion: Ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre were associated with significantly reduced operating room time and total cost compared with matched cases performed via a hospital outpatient department. Ambulatory surgery centres provide an opportunity to improve cost efficacy and reduce wait-lists for surgical care.
{"title":"Cost comparison of orthopedic sports medicine procedures in an ambulatory surgical centre and a hospital outpatient department.","authors":"Scott Harrison, Jimmy Ro, Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, Alan Getgood, Robert Giffin, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits, Ryan M Degen","doi":"10.1503/cjs.010424","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.010424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory surgery centres are becoming an attractive alternative to hospital-based outpatient departments; however, limited data exist on their cost efficacy in a publicly funded health care model. In this study, we aimed to compare costs for ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre and a hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), or hip arthroscopy between January 2020 and August 2022. We collected demographic characteristics, procedural costs, and procedural data. We used 2-sample <i>t</i> tests to compare care-related costs between groups treated in an ambulatory surgery centre and hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for age and concomitant procedures, we included a total of 132 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or rotator cuff repair in an ambulatory surgery centre had significantly shorter duration of total operating room time, and procedural duration was equivocal (<i>p</i> > 0.1) between sites. Procedure time for ACLR was significantly shorter in the group treated in an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group treated in a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The total case costs for the ambulatory surgery centre were significantly lower for hip arthroscopy ($3543, standard deviation (SD) $365 v. $6209, SD $681; <i>p</i> < 0.05), rotator cuff repair ($4259, SD $934 v. $5786, SD $934; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and ACLR ($3136, SD $459 v. $4821, SD $1511; <i>p</i> < 0.05), despite a lack of differences in associated disposable implant costs for ACLR and rotator cuff repair (<i>p</i> > 0.1). Material costs were significantly lower in the group receiving hip arthroscopy at an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group receiving the same procedure at a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no differences in immediate 6-week postoperative care-associated costs between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre were associated with significantly reduced operating room time and total cost compared with matched cases performed via a hospital outpatient department. Ambulatory surgery centres provide an opportunity to improve cost efficacy and reduce wait-lists for surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E89-E96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908787/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-05Print Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.001825-l
{"title":"Increasing the capacity of general surgeons practising outside of major centres.","authors":"","doi":"10.1503/cjs.001825-l","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.001825-l","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E87-E88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143565945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-26Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012223
Reagan L Robertson, Garrett G R J Johnson, Ashley Vergis, Ahmer Karimuddin, Terry Phang, Manoj Raval, Carl Brown
Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe and effective therapy for local excision of rectal lesions, but early postoperative infectious and inflammatory complications are variably defined in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe post-TEM syndrome, a cluster of postoperative symptoms related to a local inflammatory process seen in a subset of patients after TEM.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected observational data of all patients who underwent TEM at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, between 2006 and 2017.
Results: During the study period, 795 patients were treated by TEM at the study institution. Of these, 56 patients had postoperative pain or fever and 26 patients were determined to have post-TEM syndrome based on our definition. Sixteen patients presented within the first 2 postoperative days, with all patients presenting within 1 week. All patients who underwent cross-sectional imaging (n = 11) had a combination of inflammatory changes with stranding and free fluid, or with small bubbles of free intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or mesorectal air, or with both; they did not have signs of free perforation or abscess at the surgical site. Nearly all patients with post-TEM syndrome (96%) did not progress to further infectious complications. Most patients' (92%) post-TEM symptoms resolved within 1 week of conservative treatment.
Conclusion: We provided a description of post-TEM syndrome, the constellation of symptoms arising from a localized inflammatory response in a subset of patients after TEM. This syndrome is uncommon, and nearly all patients recovered with conservative management without a need for more invasive intervention.
{"title":"Post-transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) syndrome: a constellation of symptoms resulting from localized inflammatory changes after TEM.","authors":"Reagan L Robertson, Garrett G R J Johnson, Ashley Vergis, Ahmer Karimuddin, Terry Phang, Manoj Raval, Carl Brown","doi":"10.1503/cjs.012223","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.012223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a safe and effective therapy for local excision of rectal lesions, but early postoperative infectious and inflammatory complications are variably defined in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe post-TEM syndrome, a cluster of postoperative symptoms related to a local inflammatory process seen in a subset of patients after TEM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected observational data of all patients who underwent TEM at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, between 2006 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 795 patients were treated by TEM at the study institution. Of these, 56 patients had postoperative pain or fever and 26 patients were determined to have post-TEM syndrome based on our definition. Sixteen patients presented within the first 2 postoperative days, with all patients presenting within 1 week. All patients who underwent cross-sectional imaging (<i>n</i> = 11) had a combination of inflammatory changes with stranding and free fluid, or with small bubbles of free intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal, or mesorectal air, or with both; they did not have signs of free perforation or abscess at the surgical site. Nearly all patients with post-TEM syndrome (96%) did not progress to further infectious complications. Most patients' (92%) post-TEM symptoms resolved within 1 week of conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We provided a description of post-TEM syndrome, the constellation of symptoms arising from a localized inflammatory response in a subset of patients after TEM. This syndrome is uncommon, and nearly all patients recovered with conservative management without a need for more invasive intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E73-E79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.000725
Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and medicine - inevitable but not invulnerable for now.","authors":"Edward J Harvey, Chad G Ball","doi":"10.1503/cjs.000725","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.000725","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E62-E63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014623
Rachael Pack, Mary C Ott, Sayra Cristancho, Melissa Chin, Julie Ann Van Koughnett, Michael Ott
Background: Given the complexity of the transition to competency-based medical education (CBME) and the diversity of systems and learning contexts, the literature has acknowledged the need for principled yet contextual approaches to implementation. There is a need for research that examines these adaptations and their consequences, both intended and unintended.
Methods: We performed a constructivist grounded theory study to explore how the theory of CBME translated to practice in operative settings in a Canadian approach to CBME: Competence by Design (CBD).
Results: Program contexts both enabled and hindered how CBD translated into practice. The operative context was aligned with the principles of competency-focused instruction and allowed for frequent, direct observation and formative feedback. Time, personnel, and technology constraints unique to the patterns of practice in operative settings hindered programmatic assessment.
Conclusion: Adaptations to CBME that are responsive to the context of programs can support the intended conceptual learning conditions of CBME.
{"title":"Lost in translation? How context shapes the implementation of Competence by Design in operative settings.","authors":"Rachael Pack, Mary C Ott, Sayra Cristancho, Melissa Chin, Julie Ann Van Koughnett, Michael Ott","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014623","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.014623","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the complexity of the transition to competency-based medical education (CBME) and the diversity of systems and learning contexts, the literature has acknowledged the need for principled yet contextual approaches to implementation. There is a need for research that examines these adaptations and their consequences, both intended and unintended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a constructivist grounded theory study to explore how the theory of CBME translated to practice in operative settings in a Canadian approach to CBME: Competence by Design (CBD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Program contexts both enabled and hindered how CBD translated into practice. The operative context was aligned with the principles of competency-focused instruction and allowed for frequent, direct observation and formative feedback. Time, personnel, and technology constraints unique to the patterns of practice in operative settings hindered programmatic assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adaptations to CBME that are responsive to the context of programs can support the intended conceptual learning conditions of CBME.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E49-E54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-06Print Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1503/cjs.007724
Garrett Johnson, Haven Roy, Sandra Webber, Farhana Shariff, Ramzi Helewa, David Hochman, Jason Park, Eric Hyun
Background: Workplace injuries are increasingly recognized as a substantial detriment to surgeon longevity and productivity. Limited data exist on pain and injury prevalence among rectal surgeons. In this epidemiologic study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical discomfort among rectal surgeons in Canada and identify potential causative factors.
Methods: We distributed a web-based survey to rectal surgeons in Canada between January and October 2022. We included colorectal surgeons, surgical oncologists, and colorectal surgery fellows associated with Canadian university hospitals.
Results: Of the 72 surgeons we contacted, 48 participated (67%). More than 98% reported experiencing physical discomfort or pain during rectal surgery, with more than half experiencing these symptoms weekly. Neck, shoulders, and back were common pain or discomfort locations, whether surgeons were performing open surgery or using a minimally invasive platform. Laparoscopic equipment, headlight, and pelvic retractor use were the most common causes. Many surgeons (54%) sought professional treatment and employed risk-reducing strategies such as intraoperative stretching (48%) or after-work strength training exercises (52%). Satisfaction with pain levels during surgery was uncommon (40%). Multivariable analysis showed advancing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.23) and larger percentage of minimally invasive surgeries (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33) as significant predictors of increased discomfort. After-work exercise participation was protective in both open (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95) and minimally invasive surgeries (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98).
Conclusion: Rectal surgeons in Canada commonly experience pain and injury during surgery, underscoring the need for improved safety measures to preserve their physical health and career longevity.
背景:工作场所伤害越来越被认为是对外科医生寿命和工作效率的重大损害。关于直肠外科医生疼痛和损伤患病率的数据有限。在这项流行病学研究中,我们旨在估计加拿大直肠外科医生身体不适的患病率,并确定潜在的致病因素。方法:我们在2022年1月至10月期间向加拿大的直肠外科医生分发了一份基于网络的调查。我们包括结直肠外科医生、外科肿瘤学家和与加拿大大学医院有关的结直肠外科研究员。结果:在我们联系的72位外科医生中,48位参与了手术(67%)。超过98%的人报告在直肠手术中感到身体不适或疼痛,超过一半的人每周都会出现这些症状。无论外科医生是进行开放手术还是使用微创平台,颈部、肩部和背部都是常见的疼痛或不适部位。腹腔镜设备、前灯和骨盆牵开器的使用是最常见的原因。许多外科医生(54%)寻求专业治疗,并采取降低风险的策略,如术中拉伸(48%)或术后力量训练(52%)。手术期间对疼痛程度的满意度不高(40%)。多变量分析显示,高龄(优势比[OR] 1.12, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.02-1.23)和较大比例的微创手术(优势比[OR] 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33)是不适感增加的重要预测因素。在开放性手术(OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95)和微创手术(OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98)中,参加下班后运动均具有保护作用。结论:加拿大直肠外科医生在手术过程中通常会遇到疼痛和损伤,强调需要改进安全措施以保护他们的身体健康和职业寿命。
{"title":"Colorectal surgeon physical pain and conditioning: a national survey.","authors":"Garrett Johnson, Haven Roy, Sandra Webber, Farhana Shariff, Ramzi Helewa, David Hochman, Jason Park, Eric Hyun","doi":"10.1503/cjs.007724","DOIUrl":"10.1503/cjs.007724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace injuries are increasingly recognized as a substantial detriment to surgeon longevity and productivity. Limited data exist on pain and injury prevalence among rectal surgeons. In this epidemiologic study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of physical discomfort among rectal surgeons in Canada and identify potential causative factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a web-based survey to rectal surgeons in Canada between January and October 2022. We included colorectal surgeons, surgical oncologists, and colorectal surgery fellows associated with Canadian university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 72 surgeons we contacted, 48 participated (67%). More than 98% reported experiencing physical discomfort or pain during rectal surgery, with more than half experiencing these symptoms weekly. Neck, shoulders, and back were common pain or discomfort locations, whether surgeons were performing open surgery or using a minimally invasive platform. Laparoscopic equipment, headlight, and pelvic retractor use were the most common causes. Many surgeons (54%) sought professional treatment and employed risk-reducing strategies such as intraoperative stretching (48%) or after-work strength training exercises (52%). Satisfaction with pain levels during surgery was uncommon (40%). Multivariable analysis showed advancing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.23) and larger percentage of minimally invasive surgeries (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.33) as significant predictors of increased discomfort. After-work exercise participation was protective in both open (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.95) and minimally invasive surgeries (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rectal surgeons in Canada commonly experience pain and injury during surgery, underscoring the need for improved safety measures to preserve their physical health and career longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 1","pages":"E64-E70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11818781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}