首页 > 最新文献

Central European Journal of Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference in lower urinary tract symptoms 3 months after Rezum therapy. 雷珠治疗 3 个月后下尿路症状达到最小临床意义差异的预测因素。
IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-11 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.256
Mustufa Babar, Max Abramson, Kevin Labagnara, Justin Loloi, Hasan Jamil, Rahman Sayed, Kevin Tang, Matthew Ines, Sandeep Singh, Nazifa Iqbal, Michael Ciatto

Introduction: Gaining insight into patient characteristics to predict the success of procedures is crucial for improving outcomes and for preoperative counselling. We identified predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 3 months after Rezūm.

Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezūm. Patients with moderate or severe LUTS and a recorded International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months were included and categorised into 2 cohorts based on experiencing a MCID at 3 months (≥ 25% improvement in IPSS). Predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Out of 174 patients, 134 (77%) achieved a MCID at 3 months, and those who did had a higher median baseline IPSS (20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21], P <0.001) and were more likely to have severe LUTS at baseline (53.0% vs 35.0%, P = 0.046) when compared to those who did not experience a MCID at 3 months. Higher baseline IPSS (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) and larger baseline prostate volumes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.05) were predictors of achieving a MCID at 3 months. More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of patients with severe LUTS (83.5 vs 70.8%, P = 0.046) and prostate volume ≥60 cc (94.6 vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) achieved MCID at 3 months when compared to patients with moderate LUTS and prostate volumes <60 cc, respectively.

Conclusions: More than three-quarters of patients treated with Rezūm achieved a MCID at 3 months. Patients with severe LUTS and prostate volumes ≥ 60 cc may be optimal candidates for experiencing early relief in LUTS following Rezūm.

介绍:深入了解患者特征以预测手术成功与否,对于改善疗效和术前咨询至关重要。我们确定了 Rezūm 术后 3 个月下尿路症状(LUTS)达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的预测因素:对接受 Rezūm 治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。研究纳入了中度或重度LUTS患者,并记录了患者3个月时的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),根据患者3个月时的MCID(IPSS改善≥25%)将其分为两组。通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定了预测因素:在 174 名患者中,134 人(77%)在 3 个月时达到 MCID,达到 MCID 的患者基线 IPSS 中位数较高(20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21],P 结论:四分之三的患者在 3 个月时达到 MCID:超过四分之三接受雷珠治疗的患者在 3 个月后达到 MCID。尿失禁症状严重且前列腺体积≥ 60 毫升的患者可能是接受 Rezūm 治疗后早期缓解尿失禁症状的最佳人选。
{"title":"Predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference in lower urinary tract symptoms 3 months after Rezum therapy.","authors":"Mustufa Babar, Max Abramson, Kevin Labagnara, Justin Loloi, Hasan Jamil, Rahman Sayed, Kevin Tang, Matthew Ines, Sandeep Singh, Nazifa Iqbal, Michael Ciatto","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gaining insight into patient characteristics to predict the success of procedures is crucial for improving outcomes and for preoperative counselling. We identified predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 3 months after Rezūm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezūm. Patients with moderate or severe LUTS and a recorded International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months were included and categorised into 2 cohorts based on experiencing a MCID at 3 months (≥ 25% improvement in IPSS). Predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 174 patients, 134 (77%) achieved a MCID at 3 months, and those who did had a higher median baseline IPSS (20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21], P <0.001) and were more likely to have severe LUTS at baseline (53.0% vs 35.0%, P = 0.046) when compared to those who did not experience a MCID at 3 months. Higher baseline IPSS (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) and larger baseline prostate volumes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.05) were predictors of achieving a MCID at 3 months. More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of patients with severe LUTS (83.5 vs 70.8%, P = 0.046) and prostate volume ≥60 cc (94.6 vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) achieved MCID at 3 months when compared to patients with moderate LUTS and prostate volumes <60 cc, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than three-quarters of patients treated with Rezūm achieved a MCID at 3 months. Patients with severe LUTS and prostate volumes ≥ 60 cc may be optimal candidates for experiencing early relief in LUTS following Rezūm.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"262-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study. 比较西洛多辛和米拉贝琼作为远端输尿管结石的药物排石疗法:一项前瞻性随机研究。
IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182
Mohammad Shazib Faridi, Sanika Deshpande

Introduction: In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of mirabegron and silodosin as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric calculus ≤10 mm.

Material and methods: A total of 114 patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomised into 2 groups, 58 patients in the silodosin group and 56 patients in the mirabegron group. The drugs were given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the stone expulsion rate, and secondary endpoints were stone expulsion time and number of pain episodes.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mean age, gender, mean stone size, side, or hydronephrosis. Both groups exhibited similar rates of stone expulsion and expulsion time. Regarding pain management, the frequency of renal colic episodes was significantly lower with mirabegron compared to silodosin (2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2, P <0.0001). Six patients were excluded from the study due to adverse drug reactions: 4 (6.15%) in the silodosin group (retrograde ejaculation, hypotension) and 2 (3.27%) in the mirabegron group (hypertension).

Conclusions: In among patients with distal ureteric stones measuring 5-10 mm, mirabegron did not demonstrate superiority in stone expulsion rate or expulsion time compared to silodosin. However, mirabegron significantly reduced the frequency of renal colic episodes. Therefore, mirabegron may be considered a preferable option for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones over silodosin.

简介本研究旨在比较米拉贝琼和西洛多辛作为药物排石疗法(MET)治疗输尿管远端结石(≤10 mm)的疗效:符合纳入标准的 114 名患者被随机分为两组,西洛多辛组 58 人,米贝格隆组 56 人。用药时间最长为 4 周。主要终点是结石排出率,次要终点是结石排出时间和疼痛发作次数:两组患者在平均年龄、性别、平均结石大小、侧卧位或肾积水方面均无统计学差异。两组的结石排出率和排出时间相似。在疼痛治疗方面,米雷贝琼的肾绞痛发作频率明显低于西洛多辛(2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2,P 结论:米雷贝琼的肾绞痛发作频率明显低于西洛多辛(2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2,P):在患有 5-10 毫米输尿管远端结石的患者中,与西洛多辛相比,米拉贝格隆在结石排出率和排出时间方面没有优势。然而,米拉贝琼却大大降低了肾绞痛发作的频率。因此,与西洛多辛相比,米拉贝琼可被视为输尿管远端结石药物排石疗法的首选。
{"title":"Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.","authors":"Mohammad Shazib Faridi, Sanika Deshpande","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of mirabegron and silodosin as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric calculus ≤10 mm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 114 patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomised into 2 groups, 58 patients in the silodosin group and 56 patients in the mirabegron group. The drugs were given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the stone expulsion rate, and secondary endpoints were stone expulsion time and number of pain episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mean age, gender, mean stone size, side, or hydronephrosis. Both groups exhibited similar rates of stone expulsion and expulsion time. Regarding pain management, the frequency of renal colic episodes was significantly lower with mirabegron compared to silodosin (2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2, P <0.0001). Six patients were excluded from the study due to adverse drug reactions: 4 (6.15%) in the silodosin group (retrograde ejaculation, hypotension) and 2 (3.27%) in the mirabegron group (hypertension).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In among patients with distal ureteric stones measuring 5-10 mm, mirabegron did not demonstrate superiority in stone expulsion rate or expulsion time compared to silodosin. However, mirabegron significantly reduced the frequency of renal colic episodes. Therefore, mirabegron may be considered a preferable option for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones over silodosin.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"286-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia using Schelin catheter: a preliminary communication. 使用 Schelin 导管进行经尿道膀胱内麻醉的前列腺钬激光去核术:初步交流。
IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-28 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2024.57
Daniele Romagnoli, Alberto Bianchi, Agnese Oddi, Dario Recenti, Orest Xhafka, Riccardo Schiavina, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Del Rosso

Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin CatheterTM (SC) in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Material and methods: TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia.

Results: We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure.

Conclusions: This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.

简介本研究旨在评估在接受前列腺钬激光去核术(HoLEP)的患者中使用 Schelin CatheterTM(SC)进行经尿道前列腺内麻醉(TUIA)的可行性、安全性和优势:使用SC进行前列腺腔内麻醉(TUIA),SC是一种导管,配有一个带牵引针的手术通道、一个标准引流出口和一个球囊端口。将 SC 插入患者尿道并填充气球使其固定在膀胱颈部后,在前列腺基底部区域的每个象限进行四次局麻药目标注射。注射后,拔出导管,开始进行 HoLEP 手术。在手术过程中,患者还接受了中度镇静/镇痛:我们选择了两名 63 岁、表现良好的患者。第一位患者的前列腺体积为 40 毫升,第二位患者的前列腺体积为 31 毫升。在手术过程中,患者仅有轻微不适,住院期间患者的数字评分表(NRS)疼痛评分从1分到0分不等,无需额外使用镇痛药。围术期和术后15天内未出现并发症:这是第一份关于通过 SC 对接受 HoLEP 的患者进行 TUIA 的报告。在我们的初步经验中,经皮腔穿刺的 TUIA 安全可行,围术期疼痛得到完全控制。还需要进一步的研究来证实这些令人鼓舞的结果,并更好地界定符合此类治疗条件的患者类别。
{"title":"Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia using Schelin catheter: a preliminary communication.","authors":"Daniele Romagnoli, Alberto Bianchi, Agnese Oddi, Dario Recenti, Orest Xhafka, Riccardo Schiavina, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Del Rosso","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin Catheter<sup>TM</sup> (SC) in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the incidence and risk factors of postoperative urosepsis in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. 评估输尿管镜碎石术患者术后尿毒症的发生率和风险因素。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.167
Krystian Kaczmarek, Marta Jankowska, Jakub Kalembkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Ositadima Chukwu, Artur Lemiński, Marcin Słojewski

Introduction: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an approved, minimally invasive, low-risk procedure for urolithiasis treatment. However, some patients may develop urinary tract infection (UTI) post-procedure, eventually leading to urosepsis. Determining the predictors of infection after URSL would help identify patients at a high risk of urosepsis, thereby enabling the early implementation of effective treatment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the incidence and predictors of urosepsis after URSL.

Material and methods: We assessed 231 patients who underwent URSL using a holmium laser. The incidence of urosepsis during the 30-day post-treatment period was analysed, and potential predictors of urosepsis, including patient characteristics and individual clinical factors, were examined.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed that 16.88% of patients had a confirmed positive urine culture before the procedure. Post-procedure urosepsis occurred in 4.76% of patients. Univariable analysis revealed that 3 factors were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative urosepsis: double-J stent insertion before URSL, pre-operative positive urine culture, and MDR pathogen found preoperatively. In multivariable analysis, only positive urine culture remained significantly associated with the risk of urosepsis after URSL.

Conclusions: Patients with positive urine culture before URSL are at significantly higher risk of urosepsis in the postoperative period. Hence, urine culture should be routinely performed before planned endoscopic urolithiasis treatment.

导言:输尿管镜碎石术(URSL)是一种已获批准的治疗尿路结石的微创、低风险手术。然而,一些患者可能会在手术后出现尿路感染(UTI),最终导致尿毒症。确定尿路结石手术后感染的预测因素将有助于识别尿毒症高风险患者,从而及早实施有效治疗。因此,我们旨在确定尿道上皮内切开术后尿道炎的发生率和预测因素:我们评估了 231 名使用钬激光进行尿路结石手术的患者。分析了治疗后 30 天内尿道炎的发生率,并研究了尿道炎的潜在预测因素,包括患者特征和个体临床因素:统计分析显示,16.88%的患者在手术前尿培养呈阳性。4.76%的患者在手术后出现尿毒症。单变量分析显示,有三个因素与术后尿毒症的风险显著相关:尿道支架植入术前插入双 J 支架、术前尿培养阳性、术前发现 MDR 病原。在多变量分析中,只有尿培养阳性仍与尿道上皮内切开术后尿路败血症的风险显著相关:结论:尿道上裂前尿培养阳性的患者术后发生尿毒症的风险明显更高。因此,在计划进行内镜下尿路结石治疗前,应常规进行尿培养。
{"title":"Assessment of the incidence and risk factors of postoperative urosepsis in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy.","authors":"Krystian Kaczmarek, Marta Jankowska, Jakub Kalembkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Ositadima Chukwu, Artur Lemiński, Marcin Słojewski","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an approved, minimally invasive, low-risk procedure for urolithiasis treatment. However, some patients may develop urinary tract infection (UTI) post-procedure, eventually leading to urosepsis. Determining the predictors of infection after URSL would help identify patients at a high risk of urosepsis, thereby enabling the early implementation of effective treatment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the incidence and predictors of urosepsis after URSL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed 231 patients who underwent URSL using a holmium laser. The incidence of urosepsis during the 30-day post-treatment period was analysed, and potential predictors of urosepsis, including patient characteristics and individual clinical factors, were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed that 16.88% of patients had a confirmed positive urine culture before the procedure. Post-procedure urosepsis occurred in 4.76% of patients. Univariable analysis revealed that 3 factors were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative urosepsis: double-J stent insertion before URSL, pre-operative positive urine culture, and MDR pathogen found preoperatively. In multivariable analysis, only positive urine culture remained significantly associated with the risk of urosepsis after URSL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with positive urine culture before URSL are at significantly higher risk of urosepsis in the postoperative period. Hence, urine culture should be routinely performed before planned endoscopic urolithiasis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032028/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evolving types of pudendal neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction. 用于治疗下尿路功能障碍的不断演变的阴部神经调控类型。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-06 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.86
Stefano Parodi, Harry J Kendall, Carlo Terrone, John Pfa Heesakkers

Introduction: Sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and overactive bladder yield good and reliable results. However, neuromodulation research is continuously evolving because there is still need for more patient-friendly treatment options in the therapeutic management of LUTD. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) has been emerging as a promising alternative treatment option for the last few decades. The aim of this study is to review the current state of the art of PNM.

Material and methods: A wide literature search was conducted in the field of PNM using Medline through the PubMed database and Elsevier using the Scopus database; a critical review of the results was then carried out. PNM has been studied in its various possible aspects: percutaneous PNM, transrectal/transvaginal PNM, and both percutaneous and transcutaneous dorsal genital nerve stimulation.

Results: Each technique was found to result in promising improvements in different clinical outcomes, with some trials reporting even better results than sacral neuromodulation.

Conclusions: As a result of a comparison between the various PNM techniques with both sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation, we think that PNM should be seen as seriously promising, and we believe it will expand the treatment options for overactive bladder. Even though several studies accordingly showed PNM to be safe and effective, a systematic review and meta-analysis were not feasible. PNM in its various techniques is a promising treatment for LUTD. Nevertheless, further research is needed to include it in treatment algorithms.

简介:骶神经调控和胫后神经刺激治疗下尿路功能障碍(LUTD)和膀胱过度活动症取得了良好可靠的效果。然而,神经调控研究仍在不断发展,因为在下尿路功能障碍的治疗过程中,仍需要更多方便患者的治疗方案。在过去的几十年中,耻骨神经调控(PNM)已成为一种前景广阔的替代治疗方案。本研究的目的是回顾 PNM 的技术现状:通过 PubMed 数据库的 Medline 和 Scopus 数据库的 Elsevier 对 PNM 领域的文献进行了广泛的搜索;然后对搜索结果进行了严格的审查。PNM 的研究涉及各个方面:经皮 PNM、经直肠/经阴道 PNM 以及经皮和经皮生殖器背神经刺激:结果:每种技术都有望改善不同的临床结果,有些试验报告的结果甚至优于骶神经调控技术:通过对各种膀胱过度活动症治疗技术与骶神经调控术和胫后神经刺激术的比较,我们认为膀胱过度活动症治疗技术前景广阔,相信它将扩大膀胱过度活动症的治疗范围。尽管有多项研究显示 PNM 安全有效,但进行系统回顾和荟萃分析并不可行。各种技术的 PNM 是治疗膀胱过度活动症的一种很有前景的方法。不过,要将其纳入治疗算法,还需要进一步的研究。
{"title":"Evolving types of pudendal neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.","authors":"Stefano Parodi, Harry J Kendall, Carlo Terrone, John Pfa Heesakkers","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.86","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and overactive bladder yield good and reliable results. However, neuromodulation research is continuously evolving because there is still need for more patient-friendly treatment options in the therapeutic management of LUTD. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) has been emerging as a promising alternative treatment option for the last few decades. The aim of this study is to review the current state of the art of PNM.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A wide literature search was conducted in the field of PNM using Medline through the PubMed database and Elsevier using the Scopus database; a critical review of the results was then carried out. PNM has been studied in its various possible aspects: percutaneous PNM, transrectal/transvaginal PNM, and both percutaneous and transcutaneous dorsal genital nerve stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each technique was found to result in promising improvements in different clinical outcomes, with some trials reporting even better results than sacral neuromodulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of a comparison between the various PNM techniques with both sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation, we think that PNM should be seen as seriously promising, and we believe it will expand the treatment options for overactive bladder. Even though several studies accordingly showed PNM to be safe and effective, a systematic review and meta-analysis were not feasible. PNM in its various techniques is a promising treatment for LUTD. Nevertheless, further research is needed to include it in treatment algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse. 有症状的前盆腔器官脱垂患者的逼尿肌活动不足。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.246
Emanuele Rubilotta, Marilena Gubbiotti, Achim Herms, Howard Goldman, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage.

Material and methods: This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included.

Results: Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006).

Conclusions: In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.

导言:本研究旨在评估有症状的前盆腔器官脱垂(POP)女性的逼尿肌活动不足(DUA)患病率,并评估DUA与POP分期之间的关系:这是一项前瞻性研究,招募了患有症状性前盆腔器官脱垂的女性。纳入了在2018年1月至2021年4月期间接受尿动力学检查(UD)的无症状2-4期POP定量系统(POP-Q)患者:共纳入了 330 名阴道前壁缺损妇女(平均年龄为 63.7 ± 18.4 岁)的数据。38名妇女(11.5%)被诊断出合并需要手术矫正的顶端缺损(子宫/阴道穹窿)。166名女性(50.3%)被发现患有阴道前壁缺损。在 DUA 女性中,发现 POP-Q 2 期的占 45.2%,3 期的占 50.9%,4 期的占 76.5%。只有 POP-Q 第 4 阶段在 DUA 和非 DUA 女性中显示出显著的统计学差异(P 0.006):结论:在有症状的 POP 女性中,无论 POP-Q 分期如何,发生 DUA 的几率都很高。约有一半因有症状的 POP 而接受 UD 的女性被诊断出 DUA,而在 POP-Q 4 期的病例中,DUA 的发生率要高出三倍。由于 POP-Q 4 期的 DUA 发生率很高,因此在进展到 4 期之前发现并治疗脱垂可能是有利的。
{"title":"Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse.","authors":"Emanuele Rubilotta, Marilena Gubbiotti, Achim Herms, Howard Goldman, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032042/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heavy as a rock or light as dust: a comparison between the perceived workload for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. 重如磐石还是轻如尘埃:体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜检查和经皮肾镜碎石术的工作量比较。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-26 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.214
Michaël Mel Henderickx, Nora Hendriks, A Carolien Bouma-Houwert, Joyce Baard, Guido M Kamphuis, Hugo W Schuil, Harrie P Beerlage, D Martijn de Bruin

Introduction: There are three common treatment options for kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). The choice of treatment is based on stone- and patient-related characteristics. However, some stones are eligible for several approaches and the decision is made based on patient and urologist's preferences. This study evaluates which approach has the highest workload.

Material and methods: Between March and August 2022, five members of the Amsterdam Endourology Research Group collected data from 22 ESWL, 31 URS and 22 PNL procedures. After each procedure, the SURG-TLX questionnaire was completed by the surgeon to evaluate workload. Six dimensions were scored for each procedure, including: mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, task complexity, situational stress, and distractions. The total workload, and the median for each dimension, was calculated and compared for the three treatments.

Results: ESWL scored significantly lower than URS for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distraction and total workload. However, task complexity did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Compared with PNL, ESWL scored significantly lower for all dimensions. Finally, PNL received significantly higher scores for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distractions and total workload than URS. Only task complexity showed no significant difference between both groups.

Conclusions: Urologists perceive the highest workload during PNL, followed by URS and finally ESWL. A follow-up study is needed to identify stressors that increase perceived workload with the purpose to address these variables and as final objective to improve urologists' workload, patient safety and treatment outcomes.

导言:肾结石有三种常见的治疗方法:体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)、输尿管镜检查(URS)和经皮肾镜碎石术(PNL)。治疗方法的选择取决于结石和患者的相关特征。不过,有些结石可采用多种方法治疗,因此要根据患者和泌尿科医生的喜好来决定。本研究评估了哪种方法的工作量最大:2022 年 3 月至 8 月间,阿姆斯特丹腔内泌尿学研究小组的五名成员收集了 22 例 ESWL、31 例 URS 和 22 例 PNL 手术的数据。每次手术后,外科医生都要填写 SURG-TLX 问卷,以评估工作量。每项手术都有六个方面的评分,包括:精神需求、体力需求、时间需求、任务复杂性、情境压力和分心。计算并比较了三种治疗方法的总工作量和每个维度的中位数:结果:ESWL 在精神需求、体力需求、时间需求、情境压力、分心和总工作量方面的得分明显低于 URS。然而,两种技术的任务复杂性并无明显差异。与 PNL 相比,ESWL 在所有方面的得分都明显较低。最后,PNL 在心理需求、生理需求、时间需求、情境压力、注意力分散和总工作量方面的得分都明显高于 URS。只有任务复杂性在两组之间没有明显差异:结论:泌尿科医生在 PNL 过程中的工作量最大,其次是 URS,最后是 ESWL。需要进行后续研究,以确定增加感知工作量的压力因素,从而解决这些变量,并将改善泌尿科医生的工作量、患者安全和治疗效果作为最终目标。
{"title":"Heavy as a rock or light as dust: a comparison between the perceived workload for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Michaël Mel Henderickx, Nora Hendriks, A Carolien Bouma-Houwert, Joyce Baard, Guido M Kamphuis, Hugo W Schuil, Harrie P Beerlage, D Martijn de Bruin","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are three common treatment options for kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). The choice of treatment is based on stone- and patient-related characteristics. However, some stones are eligible for several approaches and the decision is made based on patient and urologist's preferences. This study evaluates which approach has the highest workload.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between March and August 2022, five members of the Amsterdam Endourology Research Group collected data from 22 ESWL, 31 URS and 22 PNL procedures. After each procedure, the SURG-TLX questionnaire was completed by the surgeon to evaluate workload. Six dimensions were scored for each procedure, including: mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, task complexity, situational stress, and distractions. The total workload, and the median for each dimension, was calculated and compared for the three treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESWL scored significantly lower than URS for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distraction and total workload. However, task complexity did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Compared with PNL, ESWL scored significantly lower for all dimensions. Finally, PNL received significantly higher scores for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distractions and total workload than URS. Only task complexity showed no significant difference between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urologists perceive the highest workload during PNL, followed by URS and finally ESWL. A follow-up study is needed to identify stressors that increase perceived workload with the purpose to address these variables and as final objective to improve urologists' workload, patient safety and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032039/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief. 他达拉非加坦索罗辛联合疗法对缓解输尿管支架相关症状的疗效。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.66
Ihor Komisarenko, Oleg Banyra, Oleg Nikitin, Yaroslav Klymenko, Mykola Chaplia, Andrii Borzhievskyy

Introduction: Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.

Material and methods: 279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14th day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.

Results: At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.

Conclusions: Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.

导言:输尿管支架相关症状(USRs)是输尿管支架植入术的常见并发症。选择性α-1受体阻滞剂坦索罗辛(Tamsulosin)和PDE-5抑制剂他达拉非(Tadalafil)是缓解输尿管支架相关症状的药物之一。本研究旨在评估坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法治疗 USR 的有效性和安全性,并与坦索罗辛或他达拉非单一疗法的疗效进行比较。材料和方法:279 名单侧留置输尿管支架的患者被随机分为坦索罗辛 0.4 毫克+他达拉非 5 毫克每天一次(第 1 组,n = 67)、坦索罗辛 0.4 毫克每天一次(第 2 组,n = 71)、他达拉非 5 毫克每天一次(第 3 组,n = 69)和安慰剂每天一次(第 4 组,n = 72)。在治疗的第14天,使用输尿管症状评分问卷(USSQ)登记并计算USRs的严重程度。对副作用和镇痛剂总用量进行了记录和比较:结果:在单侧输尿管支架患者的终点,坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法与坦索罗辛(15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6,p = 0.0003)或他达拉非(15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8,p = 0.0004)单药疗法相比,排尿症状强度明显降低。与安慰剂相比,所有治疗组的 USR 均有明显缓解,其中以联合治疗组最为明显。第 1 组的身体疼痛和镇痛需求低于第 2、3 或 4 组。副作用极少,组间频率无统计学差异:结论:与他达拉非或坦索罗辛单一疗法相比,坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法是一种有效而安全的选择,能在统计学上更显著地缓解USR。
{"title":"Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief.","authors":"Ihor Komisarenko, Oleg Banyra, Oleg Nikitin, Yaroslav Klymenko, Mykola Chaplia, Andrii Borzhievskyy","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.66","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.66","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14<sup>th</sup> day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032023/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140874503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nitroxoline: treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections from the urologist's perspective. 硝唑啉:从泌尿科医生的角度看尿路感染的治疗和预防。
IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2024.17
Wojciech Krajewski, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Wojciech Tomczak, Łukasz Nowak, Joanna Chorbińska, Aleksandra Sójka, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko

Introduction: Nitroxoline is an old antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of pharmacological applications and a unique mechanism of action. However, its use in the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has not been popular in the recent past. Recently, nitroxoline is gaining interest, due to frequent drug-resistance in uropathogens. Unfortunately, there are few modern clinical trials assessing this antibiotic. Also, older researchers often do not meet current scientific standards. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of nitroxoline as a viable option in treating uncomplicated lower UTIs.

Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search regarding the use of nitroxoline in UTIs was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. A cross-reference search was also performed. Case reports, editorials and non-peer-reviewed literature were excluded from further analysis. As a result, 21 publications were included in this review.

Results: The available literature on nitroxoline's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, minimum inhibitory concentrations, in vitro activity and resistance rates strongly suggests that nitroxoline is a potent broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. Moreover, clinical efficacy of the drug was analyzed - 2 articles proved high eradication rates in women with uncomplicated lower UTIs and 1 reported unsuccessful treatment in geriatric patients with lower complicated and uncomplicated UTIs. Finally, the present data on adverse effects indicate that nitroxoline is well-tolerated.

Conclusions: Nitroxoline is an obscure, yet potentially effective and safe antimicrobial agent in uncomplicated lower UTIs. Unfortunately, it is available only in a few countries. Nonetheless, nitroxoline can be useful in urological practice.

简介硝唑啉是一种古老的抗菌剂,具有广泛的药理应用和独特的作用机制。然而,近年来它在治疗和预防尿路感染(UTI)方面的应用并不普遍。最近,由于尿路感染病原体经常产生耐药性,人们对硝唑啉越来越感兴趣。遗憾的是,评估这种抗生素的现代临床试验很少。此外,老一辈研究人员的研究往往不符合当前的科学标准。本综述旨在全面概述硝唑啉作为治疗无并发症下尿路感染的可行方案:使用 Pubmed、Cochrane Library 和 Embase 数据库对有关硝唑啉用于治疗UTI 的文献进行了全面检索。同时还进行了交叉检索。进一步分析排除了病例报告、社论和未经同行评审的文献。因此,本综述共纳入了 21 篇文献:关于硝甲唑啉的作用机制、药代动力学、最低抑菌浓度、体外活性和耐药率的现有文献有力地表明,硝甲唑啉是一种强效广谱抗菌剂。此外,还对该药物的临床疗效进行了分析--2 篇文章证明了对患有无并发症下尿路感染的妇女的高根除率,1 篇报告了对患有复杂和无并发症下尿路感染的老年患者的不成功治疗。最后,有关不良反应的现有数据表明,硝唑啉的耐受性良好:结论:硝甲羟唑啉是一种不起眼但可能有效且安全的抗菌剂,适用于无并发症的下尿路UTI。遗憾的是,只有少数几个国家能买到这种药物。尽管如此,硝唑啉在泌尿科临床中还是很有用的。
{"title":"Nitroxoline: treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections from the urologist's perspective.","authors":"Wojciech Krajewski, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Wojciech Tomczak, Łukasz Nowak, Joanna Chorbińska, Aleksandra Sójka, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nitroxoline is an old antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of pharmacological applications and a unique mechanism of action. However, its use in the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has not been popular in the recent past. Recently, nitroxoline is gaining interest, due to frequent drug-resistance in uropathogens. Unfortunately, there are few modern clinical trials assessing this antibiotic. Also, older researchers often do not meet current scientific standards. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of nitroxoline as a viable option in treating uncomplicated lower UTIs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search regarding the use of nitroxoline in UTIs was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. A cross-reference search was also performed. Case reports, editorials and non-peer-reviewed literature were excluded from further analysis. As a result, 21 publications were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The available literature on nitroxoline's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, minimum inhibitory concentrations, <i>in vitro</i> activity and resistance rates strongly suggests that nitroxoline is a potent broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. Moreover, clinical efficacy of the drug was analyzed - 2 articles proved high eradication rates in women with uncomplicated lower UTIs and 1 reported unsuccessful treatment in geriatric patients with lower complicated and uncomplicated UTIs. Finally, the present data on adverse effects indicate that nitroxoline is well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nitroxoline is an obscure, yet potentially effective and safe antimicrobial agent in uncomplicated lower UTIs. Unfortunately, it is available only in a few countries. Nonetheless, nitroxoline can be useful in urological practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study. 逼尿肌活动不足与复杂性压力性尿失禁:一项交叉数据研究。
IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.147
Emanuele Rubilotta, Francesco Ditonno, Marilena Gubbiotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro

Introduction: It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results.

Material and methods: The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined.

Results: 142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.

导言:对于接受压力性尿失禁(SUI)手术的女性而言,目前尚不确定逼尿肌活动不足(DUA)是否会影响手术效果。关于复杂性压力性尿失禁(C-SUI)的证据则更少。该研究旨在根据 SUI 的类型评估中段尿道吊带(MUS)置入术的效果,以及 DUA 对无并发症 SUI(U-SUI)和 C-SUI 功能和手术效果的影响:研究对象为接受 MUS 手术的患者。研究对象分为四组:1: 有 DUA 的 C-SUI;2: 无 DUA 的 C-SUI;3: 有 DUA 的 U-SUI;4: 无 DUA 的 U-SUI。符合 Jeong、Abarbanel 和 Marcus、BVE 和 PIP1 Griffiths 标准之一的妇女可被纳入 DUA 组。对术后功能结果以及POUR率、新发膀胱过度活动综合征(OAB)和SUI复发率的差异进行了研究:结果:142 名妇女参加了研究,其中 97 人完成了为期 2 年的随访。54.6%的患者(53/97)发现了膀胱过度活动症。在无 DUA 组中,C-SUI 也很普遍(59.1%)。与 DUA 女性患者相比,无 DUA 患者术后 ICIQ-FLUTS 改善程度更高。无 DUA 组术后 Qmax 在统计学上明显高于 DUA 组。术后,DUA 和无 DUA 患者的 PVR 和 PVR 比率均无差异。C-SUI和U-SUI患者的POUR率分别为15.6%-12.1%,新发OAB率为12.5%-3%,胶带切口率为3.1%-3%,SUI复发率为4.6%-3%:术前DUA对接受MUS手术的患者的预后影响微乎其微,即使在C-SUI病例中也是如此。有 SUI 的 DUA 妇女,即使病情复杂,也不应被排除在此类手术之外。
{"title":"Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study.","authors":"Emanuele Rubilotta, Francesco Ditonno, Marilena Gubbiotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032043/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140849481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1