Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-11DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.256
Mustufa Babar, Max Abramson, Kevin Labagnara, Justin Loloi, Hasan Jamil, Rahman Sayed, Kevin Tang, Matthew Ines, Sandeep Singh, Nazifa Iqbal, Michael Ciatto
Introduction: Gaining insight into patient characteristics to predict the success of procedures is crucial for improving outcomes and for preoperative counselling. We identified predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 3 months after Rezūm.
Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezūm. Patients with moderate or severe LUTS and a recorded International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months were included and categorised into 2 cohorts based on experiencing a MCID at 3 months (≥ 25% improvement in IPSS). Predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: Out of 174 patients, 134 (77%) achieved a MCID at 3 months, and those who did had a higher median baseline IPSS (20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21], P <0.001) and were more likely to have severe LUTS at baseline (53.0% vs 35.0%, P = 0.046) when compared to those who did not experience a MCID at 3 months. Higher baseline IPSS (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) and larger baseline prostate volumes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.05) were predictors of achieving a MCID at 3 months. More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of patients with severe LUTS (83.5 vs 70.8%, P = 0.046) and prostate volume ≥60 cc (94.6 vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) achieved MCID at 3 months when compared to patients with moderate LUTS and prostate volumes <60 cc, respectively.
Conclusions: More than three-quarters of patients treated with Rezūm achieved a MCID at 3 months. Patients with severe LUTS and prostate volumes ≥ 60 cc may be optimal candidates for experiencing early relief in LUTS following Rezūm.
{"title":"Predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference in lower urinary tract symptoms 3 months after Rezum therapy.","authors":"Mustufa Babar, Max Abramson, Kevin Labagnara, Justin Loloi, Hasan Jamil, Rahman Sayed, Kevin Tang, Matthew Ines, Sandeep Singh, Nazifa Iqbal, Michael Ciatto","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gaining insight into patient characteristics to predict the success of procedures is crucial for improving outcomes and for preoperative counselling. We identified predictors of achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) 3 months after Rezūm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezūm. Patients with moderate or severe LUTS and a recorded International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 3 months were included and categorised into 2 cohorts based on experiencing a MCID at 3 months (≥ 25% improvement in IPSS). Predictors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 174 patients, 134 (77%) achieved a MCID at 3 months, and those who did had a higher median baseline IPSS (20 [16-26] vs 15 [10-21], P <0.001) and were more likely to have severe LUTS at baseline (53.0% vs 35.0%, P = 0.046) when compared to those who did not experience a MCID at 3 months. Higher baseline IPSS (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17) and larger baseline prostate volumes (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 1.0-1.05) were predictors of achieving a MCID at 3 months. More specifically, a significantly greater proportion of patients with severe LUTS (83.5 vs 70.8%, P = 0.046) and prostate volume ≥60 cc (94.6 vs 71.4%, P = 0.003) achieved MCID at 3 months when compared to patients with moderate LUTS and prostate volumes <60 cc, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than three-quarters of patients treated with Rezūm achieved a MCID at 3 months. Patients with severe LUTS and prostate volumes ≥ 60 cc may be optimal candidates for experiencing early relief in LUTS following Rezūm.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"262-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-25DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.182
Mohammad Shazib Faridi, Sanika Deshpande
Introduction: In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of mirabegron and silodosin as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric calculus ≤10 mm.
Material and methods: A total of 114 patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomised into 2 groups, 58 patients in the silodosin group and 56 patients in the mirabegron group. The drugs were given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the stone expulsion rate, and secondary endpoints were stone expulsion time and number of pain episodes.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mean age, gender, mean stone size, side, or hydronephrosis. Both groups exhibited similar rates of stone expulsion and expulsion time. Regarding pain management, the frequency of renal colic episodes was significantly lower with mirabegron compared to silodosin (2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2, P <0.0001). Six patients were excluded from the study due to adverse drug reactions: 4 (6.15%) in the silodosin group (retrograde ejaculation, hypotension) and 2 (3.27%) in the mirabegron group (hypertension).
Conclusions: In among patients with distal ureteric stones measuring 5-10 mm, mirabegron did not demonstrate superiority in stone expulsion rate or expulsion time compared to silodosin. However, mirabegron significantly reduced the frequency of renal colic episodes. Therefore, mirabegron may be considered a preferable option for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones over silodosin.
{"title":"Comparing silodosin and mirabegron as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculus: a prospective, randomised study.","authors":"Mohammad Shazib Faridi, Sanika Deshpande","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of mirabegron and silodosin as medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteric calculus ≤10 mm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 114 patients who met the inclusion criteria were prospectively randomised into 2 groups, 58 patients in the silodosin group and 56 patients in the mirabegron group. The drugs were given for a maximum of 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the stone expulsion rate, and secondary endpoints were stone expulsion time and number of pain episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of mean age, gender, mean stone size, side, or hydronephrosis. Both groups exhibited similar rates of stone expulsion and expulsion time. Regarding pain management, the frequency of renal colic episodes was significantly lower with mirabegron compared to silodosin (2.3 ±0.2 vs 1.9 ±0.2, P <0.0001). Six patients were excluded from the study due to adverse drug reactions: 4 (6.15%) in the silodosin group (retrograde ejaculation, hypotension) and 2 (3.27%) in the mirabegron group (hypertension).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In among patients with distal ureteric stones measuring 5-10 mm, mirabegron did not demonstrate superiority in stone expulsion rate or expulsion time compared to silodosin. However, mirabegron significantly reduced the frequency of renal colic episodes. Therefore, mirabegron may be considered a preferable option for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones over silodosin.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"286-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-28DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2024.57
Daniele Romagnoli, Alberto Bianchi, Agnese Oddi, Dario Recenti, Orest Xhafka, Riccardo Schiavina, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Del Rosso
Introduction: This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin CatheterTM (SC) in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).
Material and methods: TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia.
Results: We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure.
Conclusions: This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.
{"title":"Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia using Schelin catheter: a preliminary communication.","authors":"Daniele Romagnoli, Alberto Bianchi, Agnese Oddi, Dario Recenti, Orest Xhafka, Riccardo Schiavina, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Del Rosso","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and advantages of the use of transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using Schelin Catheter<sup>TM</sup> (SC) in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>TUIA was performed using SC, a catheter equipped with an operative channel with a retractile needle, a standard drainage outlet, and a balloon port. After inserting the SC into the patient's urethra and filling the balloon to anchor it in the bladder neck, four target injections with local anesthetic were performed, one in each quadrant in the base area of the prostate. After injections, the catheter was removed and the HoLEP procedure started. During the procedure, patients also received moderate sedation/analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected two 63-year-old patients with good performance status. Prostate volume was 40 ml for the first patient and 31 ml for the second. TUIA and HoLEP operative times were 68 minutes in the first patient and 42 minutes in the second.During the procedure, patients complained of only minimal discomfort, and during hospitalization patients' numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score ranging from 1 to 0, with no need for additional analgesics. No complications were reported perioperatively and 15 days after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first report on TUIA via SC in patients undergoing HoLEP. In our preliminary experience, TUIA via SC was safe and feasible, showing complete perioperative pain control. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising results and better define the category of patients eligible for this type of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-08DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.167
Krystian Kaczmarek, Marta Jankowska, Jakub Kalembkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Ositadima Chukwu, Artur Lemiński, Marcin Słojewski
Introduction: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an approved, minimally invasive, low-risk procedure for urolithiasis treatment. However, some patients may develop urinary tract infection (UTI) post-procedure, eventually leading to urosepsis. Determining the predictors of infection after URSL would help identify patients at a high risk of urosepsis, thereby enabling the early implementation of effective treatment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the incidence and predictors of urosepsis after URSL.
Material and methods: We assessed 231 patients who underwent URSL using a holmium laser. The incidence of urosepsis during the 30-day post-treatment period was analysed, and potential predictors of urosepsis, including patient characteristics and individual clinical factors, were examined.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed that 16.88% of patients had a confirmed positive urine culture before the procedure. Post-procedure urosepsis occurred in 4.76% of patients. Univariable analysis revealed that 3 factors were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative urosepsis: double-J stent insertion before URSL, pre-operative positive urine culture, and MDR pathogen found preoperatively. In multivariable analysis, only positive urine culture remained significantly associated with the risk of urosepsis after URSL.
Conclusions: Patients with positive urine culture before URSL are at significantly higher risk of urosepsis in the postoperative period. Hence, urine culture should be routinely performed before planned endoscopic urolithiasis treatment.
{"title":"Assessment of the incidence and risk factors of postoperative urosepsis in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy.","authors":"Krystian Kaczmarek, Marta Jankowska, Jakub Kalembkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Ositadima Chukwu, Artur Lemiński, Marcin Słojewski","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an approved, minimally invasive, low-risk procedure for urolithiasis treatment. However, some patients may develop urinary tract infection (UTI) post-procedure, eventually leading to urosepsis. Determining the predictors of infection after URSL would help identify patients at a high risk of urosepsis, thereby enabling the early implementation of effective treatment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the incidence and predictors of urosepsis after URSL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed 231 patients who underwent URSL using a holmium laser. The incidence of urosepsis during the 30-day post-treatment period was analysed, and potential predictors of urosepsis, including patient characteristics and individual clinical factors, were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed that 16.88% of patients had a confirmed positive urine culture before the procedure. Post-procedure urosepsis occurred in 4.76% of patients. Univariable analysis revealed that 3 factors were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative urosepsis: double-J stent insertion before URSL, pre-operative positive urine culture, and MDR pathogen found preoperatively. In multivariable analysis, only positive urine culture remained significantly associated with the risk of urosepsis after URSL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with positive urine culture before URSL are at significantly higher risk of urosepsis in the postoperative period. Hence, urine culture should be routinely performed before planned endoscopic urolithiasis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"122-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032028/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-06DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.86
Stefano Parodi, Harry J Kendall, Carlo Terrone, John Pfa Heesakkers
Introduction: Sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and overactive bladder yield good and reliable results. However, neuromodulation research is continuously evolving because there is still need for more patient-friendly treatment options in the therapeutic management of LUTD. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) has been emerging as a promising alternative treatment option for the last few decades. The aim of this study is to review the current state of the art of PNM.
Material and methods: A wide literature search was conducted in the field of PNM using Medline through the PubMed database and Elsevier using the Scopus database; a critical review of the results was then carried out. PNM has been studied in its various possible aspects: percutaneous PNM, transrectal/transvaginal PNM, and both percutaneous and transcutaneous dorsal genital nerve stimulation.
Results: Each technique was found to result in promising improvements in different clinical outcomes, with some trials reporting even better results than sacral neuromodulation.
Conclusions: As a result of a comparison between the various PNM techniques with both sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation, we think that PNM should be seen as seriously promising, and we believe it will expand the treatment options for overactive bladder. Even though several studies accordingly showed PNM to be safe and effective, a systematic review and meta-analysis were not feasible. PNM in its various techniques is a promising treatment for LUTD. Nevertheless, further research is needed to include it in treatment algorithms.
{"title":"Evolving types of pudendal neuromodulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction.","authors":"Stefano Parodi, Harry J Kendall, Carlo Terrone, John Pfa Heesakkers","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.86","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and overactive bladder yield good and reliable results. However, neuromodulation research is continuously evolving because there is still need for more patient-friendly treatment options in the therapeutic management of LUTD. Pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) has been emerging as a promising alternative treatment option for the last few decades. The aim of this study is to review the current state of the art of PNM.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A wide literature search was conducted in the field of PNM using Medline through the PubMed database and Elsevier using the Scopus database; a critical review of the results was then carried out. PNM has been studied in its various possible aspects: percutaneous PNM, transrectal/transvaginal PNM, and both percutaneous and transcutaneous dorsal genital nerve stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each technique was found to result in promising improvements in different clinical outcomes, with some trials reporting even better results than sacral neuromodulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a result of a comparison between the various PNM techniques with both sacral neuromodulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation, we think that PNM should be seen as seriously promising, and we believe it will expand the treatment options for overactive bladder. Even though several studies accordingly showed PNM to be safe and effective, a systematic review and meta-analysis were not feasible. PNM in its various techniques is a promising treatment for LUTD. Nevertheless, further research is needed to include it in treatment algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140854682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage.
Material and methods: This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included.
Results: Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006).
Conclusions: In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.
导言:本研究旨在评估有症状的前盆腔器官脱垂(POP)女性的逼尿肌活动不足(DUA)患病率,并评估DUA与POP分期之间的关系:这是一项前瞻性研究,招募了患有症状性前盆腔器官脱垂的女性。纳入了在2018年1月至2021年4月期间接受尿动力学检查(UD)的无症状2-4期POP定量系统(POP-Q)患者:共纳入了 330 名阴道前壁缺损妇女(平均年龄为 63.7 ± 18.4 岁)的数据。38名妇女(11.5%)被诊断出合并需要手术矫正的顶端缺损(子宫/阴道穹窿)。166名女性(50.3%)被发现患有阴道前壁缺损。在 DUA 女性中,发现 POP-Q 2 期的占 45.2%,3 期的占 50.9%,4 期的占 76.5%。只有 POP-Q 第 4 阶段在 DUA 和非 DUA 女性中显示出显著的统计学差异(P 0.006):结论:在有症状的 POP 女性中,无论 POP-Q 分期如何,发生 DUA 的几率都很高。约有一半因有症状的 POP 而接受 UD 的女性被诊断出 DUA,而在 POP-Q 4 期的病例中,DUA 的发生率要高出三倍。由于 POP-Q 4 期的 DUA 发生率很高,因此在进展到 4 期之前发现并治疗脱垂可能是有利的。
{"title":"Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse.","authors":"Emanuele Rubilotta, Marilena Gubbiotti, Achim Herms, Howard Goldman, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032042/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-26DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.214
Michaël Mel Henderickx, Nora Hendriks, A Carolien Bouma-Houwert, Joyce Baard, Guido M Kamphuis, Hugo W Schuil, Harrie P Beerlage, D Martijn de Bruin
Introduction: There are three common treatment options for kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). The choice of treatment is based on stone- and patient-related characteristics. However, some stones are eligible for several approaches and the decision is made based on patient and urologist's preferences. This study evaluates which approach has the highest workload.
Material and methods: Between March and August 2022, five members of the Amsterdam Endourology Research Group collected data from 22 ESWL, 31 URS and 22 PNL procedures. After each procedure, the SURG-TLX questionnaire was completed by the surgeon to evaluate workload. Six dimensions were scored for each procedure, including: mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, task complexity, situational stress, and distractions. The total workload, and the median for each dimension, was calculated and compared for the three treatments.
Results: ESWL scored significantly lower than URS for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distraction and total workload. However, task complexity did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Compared with PNL, ESWL scored significantly lower for all dimensions. Finally, PNL received significantly higher scores for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distractions and total workload than URS. Only task complexity showed no significant difference between both groups.
Conclusions: Urologists perceive the highest workload during PNL, followed by URS and finally ESWL. A follow-up study is needed to identify stressors that increase perceived workload with the purpose to address these variables and as final objective to improve urologists' workload, patient safety and treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Heavy as a rock or light as dust: a comparison between the perceived workload for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","authors":"Michaël Mel Henderickx, Nora Hendriks, A Carolien Bouma-Houwert, Joyce Baard, Guido M Kamphuis, Hugo W Schuil, Harrie P Beerlage, D Martijn de Bruin","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are three common treatment options for kidney stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). The choice of treatment is based on stone- and patient-related characteristics. However, some stones are eligible for several approaches and the decision is made based on patient and urologist's preferences. This study evaluates which approach has the highest workload.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between March and August 2022, five members of the Amsterdam Endourology Research Group collected data from 22 ESWL, 31 URS and 22 PNL procedures. After each procedure, the SURG-TLX questionnaire was completed by the surgeon to evaluate workload. Six dimensions were scored for each procedure, including: mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, task complexity, situational stress, and distractions. The total workload, and the median for each dimension, was calculated and compared for the three treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESWL scored significantly lower than URS for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distraction and total workload. However, task complexity did not differ significantly between the two techniques. Compared with PNL, ESWL scored significantly lower for all dimensions. Finally, PNL received significantly higher scores for mental demands, physical demands, temporal demands, situational stress, distractions and total workload than URS. Only task complexity showed no significant difference between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urologists perceive the highest workload during PNL, followed by URS and finally ESWL. A follow-up study is needed to identify stressors that increase perceived workload with the purpose to address these variables and as final objective to improve urologists' workload, patient safety and treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032039/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140860041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.
Material and methods: 279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14th day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.
Results: At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.
Conclusions: Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.
{"title":"Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief.","authors":"Ihor Komisarenko, Oleg Banyra, Oleg Nikitin, Yaroslav Klymenko, Mykola Chaplia, Andrii Borzhievskyy","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.66","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.66","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14<sup>th</sup> day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032023/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140874503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-05-20DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2024.17
Wojciech Krajewski, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Wojciech Tomczak, Łukasz Nowak, Joanna Chorbińska, Aleksandra Sójka, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko
Introduction: Nitroxoline is an old antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of pharmacological applications and a unique mechanism of action. However, its use in the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has not been popular in the recent past. Recently, nitroxoline is gaining interest, due to frequent drug-resistance in uropathogens. Unfortunately, there are few modern clinical trials assessing this antibiotic. Also, older researchers often do not meet current scientific standards. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of nitroxoline as a viable option in treating uncomplicated lower UTIs.
Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search regarding the use of nitroxoline in UTIs was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. A cross-reference search was also performed. Case reports, editorials and non-peer-reviewed literature were excluded from further analysis. As a result, 21 publications were included in this review.
Results: The available literature on nitroxoline's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, minimum inhibitory concentrations, in vitro activity and resistance rates strongly suggests that nitroxoline is a potent broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. Moreover, clinical efficacy of the drug was analyzed - 2 articles proved high eradication rates in women with uncomplicated lower UTIs and 1 reported unsuccessful treatment in geriatric patients with lower complicated and uncomplicated UTIs. Finally, the present data on adverse effects indicate that nitroxoline is well-tolerated.
Conclusions: Nitroxoline is an obscure, yet potentially effective and safe antimicrobial agent in uncomplicated lower UTIs. Unfortunately, it is available only in a few countries. Nonetheless, nitroxoline can be useful in urological practice.
{"title":"Nitroxoline: treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections from the urologist's perspective.","authors":"Wojciech Krajewski, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Wojciech Tomczak, Łukasz Nowak, Joanna Chorbińska, Aleksandra Sójka, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.17","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nitroxoline is an old antimicrobial agent with a broad spectrum of pharmacological applications and a unique mechanism of action. However, its use in the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) has not been popular in the recent past. Recently, nitroxoline is gaining interest, due to frequent drug-resistance in uropathogens. Unfortunately, there are few modern clinical trials assessing this antibiotic. Also, older researchers often do not meet current scientific standards. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of nitroxoline as a viable option in treating uncomplicated lower UTIs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search regarding the use of nitroxoline in UTIs was conducted using Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. A cross-reference search was also performed. Case reports, editorials and non-peer-reviewed literature were excluded from further analysis. As a result, 21 publications were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The available literature on nitroxoline's mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, minimum inhibitory concentrations, <i>in vitro</i> activity and resistance rates strongly suggests that nitroxoline is a potent broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. Moreover, clinical efficacy of the drug was analyzed - 2 articles proved high eradication rates in women with uncomplicated lower UTIs and 1 reported unsuccessful treatment in geriatric patients with lower complicated and uncomplicated UTIs. Finally, the present data on adverse effects indicate that nitroxoline is well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nitroxoline is an obscure, yet potentially effective and safe antimicrobial agent in uncomplicated lower UTIs. Unfortunately, it is available only in a few countries. Nonetheless, nitroxoline can be useful in urological practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"339-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-12DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.147
Emanuele Rubilotta, Francesco Ditonno, Marilena Gubbiotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro
Introduction: It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results.
Material and methods: The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined.
Results: 142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively.
Conclusions: The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.
导言:对于接受压力性尿失禁(SUI)手术的女性而言,目前尚不确定逼尿肌活动不足(DUA)是否会影响手术效果。关于复杂性压力性尿失禁(C-SUI)的证据则更少。该研究旨在根据 SUI 的类型评估中段尿道吊带(MUS)置入术的效果,以及 DUA 对无并发症 SUI(U-SUI)和 C-SUI 功能和手术效果的影响:研究对象为接受 MUS 手术的患者。研究对象分为四组:1: 有 DUA 的 C-SUI;2: 无 DUA 的 C-SUI;3: 有 DUA 的 U-SUI;4: 无 DUA 的 U-SUI。符合 Jeong、Abarbanel 和 Marcus、BVE 和 PIP1 Griffiths 标准之一的妇女可被纳入 DUA 组。对术后功能结果以及POUR率、新发膀胱过度活动综合征(OAB)和SUI复发率的差异进行了研究:结果:142 名妇女参加了研究,其中 97 人完成了为期 2 年的随访。54.6%的患者(53/97)发现了膀胱过度活动症。在无 DUA 组中,C-SUI 也很普遍(59.1%)。与 DUA 女性患者相比,无 DUA 患者术后 ICIQ-FLUTS 改善程度更高。无 DUA 组术后 Qmax 在统计学上明显高于 DUA 组。术后,DUA 和无 DUA 患者的 PVR 和 PVR 比率均无差异。C-SUI和U-SUI患者的POUR率分别为15.6%-12.1%,新发OAB率为12.5%-3%,胶带切口率为3.1%-3%,SUI复发率为4.6%-3%:术前DUA对接受MUS手术的患者的预后影响微乎其微,即使在C-SUI病例中也是如此。有 SUI 的 DUA 妇女,即使病情复杂,也不应被排除在此类手术之外。
{"title":"Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study.","authors":"Emanuele Rubilotta, Francesco Ditonno, Marilena Gubbiotti, Alessandro Antonelli, Matteo Balzarro","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032043/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140849481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}