Introduction: Current literature is inconclusive as to whether transversus abdominis (TrA) training can provide an additional benefit to pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We designed a study to investigate the effect of PFM and TrA training on incontinence parameters.
Material and methods: 60 females with SUI were randomised to PFM training alone or PFM plus TrA training. They all attended 12 weekly training sessions by a single physical therapist and completed relevant questionnaires at baseline and study completion.
Results: Both interventions reduced the number of incontinence episodes and improved quality of life (QoL) and sexual function. Women on PFM+TrA training reduced the number of used pads per day (p = 0.007), improved the QoL (p = 0.031) and the sexual lubrication score (p = 0.04), and reported better satisfaction rates compared to PFM alone (66.7% versus 43.3%). A subgroup analysis reported that women with pure SUI benefit more from combined PFM+TrA training compared to PFM alone (p = 0.04).
Conclusions: TrA add-on to PFM training was similar to PFM training alone in the reduction of incontinence episodes but was superior in reducing the number of pads needed, which suggests a beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence.
{"title":"The role of abdominal muscle training in combination with pelvic floor muscle training to treat female urinary incontinence - a pilot 12-week study.","authors":"Eleni Konstantinidou, Vasileios Sakalis, Marina Kalaitzi, Ioannis Charalampous, Mytilekas Konstantinos-Vaios, Mikos Themistoklis, Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Apostolos Apostolidis","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current literature is inconclusive as to whether transversus abdominis (TrA) training can provide an additional benefit to pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We designed a study to investigate the effect of PFM and TrA training on incontinence parameters.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>60 females with SUI were randomised to PFM training alone or PFM plus TrA training. They all attended 12 weekly training sessions by a single physical therapist and completed relevant questionnaires at baseline and study completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions reduced the number of incontinence episodes and improved quality of life (QoL) and sexual function. Women on PFM+TrA training reduced the number of used pads per day (p = 0.007), improved the QoL (p = 0.031) and the sexual lubrication score (p = 0.04), and reported better satisfaction rates compared to PFM alone (66.7% versus 43.3%). A subgroup analysis reported that women with pure SUI benefit more from combined PFM+TrA training compared to PFM alone (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TrA add-on to PFM training was similar to PFM training alone in the reduction of incontinence episodes but was superior in reducing the number of pads needed, which suggests a beneficial effect on the severity of incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"218-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428365/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-07DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.266
Marco Carilli, Riccardo Bertolo, Matteo Vittori, Valerio Iacovelli, Michele Antonucci, Francesco Maiorino, Marta Signoretti, Filomena Petta, Pierluigi Bove
Introduction: Several 'ultra-minimally-invasive' surgical treatments (uMISTs) have been developed, aiming to relieve benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and spare ejaculatory function; however, such techniques do not always ensure substantial improvements in uroflowmetry parameters. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 2-year functional outcomes of thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate (ThuIP) as an alternative to uMISTs.
Material and methods: Data of consecutive patients affected by BPO with indication to surgical intervention and a strong will to spare ejaculatory function were collected on a dedicated prospectively maintained database. A specific "trifecta" was identified as the contemporary presence of: (1) post-operative Qmax ≥15 ml/s; (2) absence of early (within 90 days) complications; and (3) preserved antegrade ejaculation.
Results: 120 patients underwent ThuIP and were analysed. Median catheterisation time was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Significant improvements in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores and uroflowmetry parameters were observed at all follow-up times. At the last follow-up visit (24 months) the median ΔIPSS was -12 (-17; -9), median ΔIPSS-QoL was -3 (-4; -2), median ΔQmax was +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0), and median ΔPVR was -50 ml (-100; 0) (all p-values <0.001). Fourteen patients reported postoperative absence of antegrade ejaculation (11.7%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 86 patients (71.7%) at 6 months, in 79 patients (65.8%) at 12 months, and in 75 patients (62.5%) at 24 months.
Conclusions: ThuIP allows for a significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, antegrade ejaculation is preserved in approximately 90% of cases.
{"title":"Thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate with ejaculation-sparing intent: 2-year follow-up outcomes from a high-volume centre.","authors":"Marco Carilli, Riccardo Bertolo, Matteo Vittori, Valerio Iacovelli, Michele Antonucci, Francesco Maiorino, Marta Signoretti, Filomena Petta, Pierluigi Bove","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several 'ultra-minimally-invasive' surgical treatments (uMISTs) have been developed, aiming to relieve benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and spare ejaculatory function; however, such techniques do not always ensure substantial improvements in uroflowmetry parameters. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 2-year functional outcomes of thulium laser transurethral incision of the prostate (ThuIP) as an alternative to uMISTs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of consecutive patients affected by BPO with indication to surgical intervention and a strong will to spare ejaculatory function were collected on a dedicated prospectively maintained database. A specific \"trifecta\" was identified as the contemporary presence of: (1) post-operative Qmax ≥15 ml/s; (2) absence of early (within 90 days) complications; and (3) preserved antegrade ejaculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>120 patients underwent ThuIP and were analysed. Median catheterisation time was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Significant improvements in IPSS and IPSS-QoL scores and uroflowmetry parameters were observed at all follow-up times. At the last follow-up visit (24 months) the median ΔIPSS was -12 (-17; -9), median ΔIPSS-QoL was -3 (-4; -2), median ΔQmax was +7.7 ml/s (+5.2; +11.0), and median ΔPVR was -50 ml (-100; 0) (all p-values <0.001). Fourteen patients reported postoperative absence of antegrade ejaculation (11.7%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 86 patients (71.7%) at 6 months, in 79 patients (65.8%) at 12 months, and in 75 patients (62.5%) at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ThuIP allows for a significant improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, antegrade ejaculation is preserved in approximately 90% of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428362/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-06DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.254
Jacopo Durante, Michele Santarsieri, Francesca Manassero, Girolamo Fiorini, Claudia Cariello, Piero Lippolis, Andrea Colli, Giorgio Pomara
{"title":"Robotic left nephrectomy with level IV inferior vena cava thrombectomy using the AngioVac system.","authors":"Jacopo Durante, Michele Santarsieri, Francesca Manassero, Girolamo Fiorini, Claudia Cariello, Piero Lippolis, Andrea Colli, Giorgio Pomara","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.254","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"159-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032026/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-02-11DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.145
Breno C Porto, Mikhael Belkovsky, Giulia V Zogaib, Carlo C Passerotti, Everson L A Artifon, Jose P Otoch, Jose A S Da Cruz
Introduction: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) are the main options for ileal ureteral replacement (IUR). It is not clear which option is superior. The purpose of this study is to compare RALS and LS for IUR.
Material and methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar for studies comparing RALS and LS for IUR. The outcomes of interest are operative time, blood loss, postoperative stay, and Clavien-Dindo complications. Meta-analysis was performed with Rev Man version 5.4.
Results: We included 36 patients from 3 studies. The mean age was 44 years, with 53% male patients. Blood loss (MD -89.13 cc, CI -129.03 to -49.22, I2 = 0%) was significantly lower in patients undergoing RALS when comparing with LS. No differences were observed when comparing operative time (MD -10.99 minutes, CI -85.66 to 63.59, p = 0.77, I2 = 64%), postoperative stay (MD -2.56 days, CI -8.24 to 3.13, p = 0.38, I2 = 30%), and postoperative complications (OR 1.63, CI 0.27 to 10.02, p = 0.60, I2 = 0%).
Conclusions: Overall, we conclude that the robot-assisted technique showed less bleeding compared to the laparoscopic technique.
{"title":"Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Breno C Porto, Mikhael Belkovsky, Giulia V Zogaib, Carlo C Passerotti, Everson L A Artifon, Jose P Otoch, Jose A S Da Cruz","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) are the main options for ileal ureteral replacement (IUR). It is not clear which option is superior. The purpose of this study is to compare RALS and LS for IUR.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar for studies comparing RALS and LS for IUR. The outcomes of interest are operative time, blood loss, postoperative stay, and Clavien-Dindo complications. Meta-analysis was performed with Rev Man version 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 36 patients from 3 studies. The mean age was 44 years, with 53% male patients. Blood loss (MD -89.13 cc, CI -129.03 to -49.22, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) was significantly lower in patients undergoing RALS when comparing with LS. No differences were observed when comparing operative time (MD -10.99 minutes, CI -85.66 to 63.59, p = 0.77, I<sup>2</sup> = 64%), postoperative stay (MD -2.56 days, CI -8.24 to 3.13, p = 0.38, I<sup>2</sup> = 30%), and postoperative complications (OR 1.63, CI 0.27 to 10.02, p = 0.60, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, we conclude that the robot-assisted technique showed less bleeding compared to the laparoscopic technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of mirabegron in children with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) for improving urinary symptoms.
Material and methods: We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS from inception to September 2023. We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of improving urinary symptoms and the safety of mirabegron at any dose in children and adolescents with idiopathic refractory OAB. We searched the interception to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for clinical trials and the MINORS tool for non-randomized studies.
Results: We included three studies in the analysis. All of them included children and adolescents receiving mirabegron as monotherapy at different doses. Also, none of them reported a control group. Improvement and safety rates were high in every study in objective and subjective measurements. Compliance was also high in all studies. Most of the evaluated items had a low risk of bias within and across studies.
Conclusions: Mirabegron as monotherapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative for children with refractory idiopathic OAB or those who are intolerant to antimuscarinic therapy.
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of mirabegron for children and adolescents with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder for improving urinary symptoms: a systematic review.","authors":"Daniela Franco-Buenaventura, Herney Andrés García-Perdomo","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of mirabegron in children with refractory overactive bladder (OAB) for improving urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS from inception to September 2023. We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of improving urinary symptoms and the safety of mirabegron at any dose in children and adolescents with idiopathic refractory OAB. We searched the interception to September 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for clinical trials and the MINORS tool for non-randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included three studies in the analysis. All of them included children and adolescents receiving mirabegron as monotherapy at different doses. Also, none of them reported a control group. Improvement and safety rates were high in every study in objective and subjective measurements. Compliance was also high in all studies. Most of the evaluated items had a low risk of bias within and across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mirabegron as monotherapy appears to be a safe and effective alternative for children with refractory idiopathic OAB or those who are intolerant to antimuscarinic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"206-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428357/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.278
Holly Colvin, Max Johnston, Francesco Ripa, Mriganka Mani Sinha, Amelia Pietropaolo, James Brewin, Christian Fiori, Ali Gozen, Bhaskar K Somani
Introduction: With the introduction of novel treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), decision making regarding surgical management has become ever more complex. Factors such as clinical exposure, equipment availability, patient characteristics and hospital setting may affect what treatment is offered and an informed patient choice. The aim of this study was to investigate how urologists help patients make decisions regarding BPH management and whether their practice would differ if they were the patient themselves.
Material and methods: A 52-question survey presenting hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to European urologists and trainees/residents online and in person. In each scenario, regarding treatment options for BPH, the participant considered themselves firstly as the treating clinician and secondly as the patient themselves. Details regarding the participants' clinical experience, awareness of treatment options and exposure to these options were obtained.
Results: There were 139 participants; 69.8% of whom were consultants, with 82.1% of participants having practiced urology for more than 5 years. A total of 59.7% of urologists consider themselves BPH specialists. Furthermore, 93.5% of those surveyed had performed transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), whilst procedures performed the least by participants were minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options. Only 17.3% had seen and 1.4% had performed all of the treatment options. When considering themselves as a patient within standard practice, there was a preference for HoLEP amongst participants.
Conclusions: The majority of urologists surveyed had minimal experience to newer BPH techniques and MIST, suggesting that more exposure is required. A higher rate of HoLEP was chosen as a treatment option for urologists themselves as a patient than what they would choose as an option for their patients.
{"title":"Transurethral resection and other minimally invasive treatment options for BPH: would we treat ourselves as we treat our patients? Results from EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) decision-making survey among urologists.","authors":"Holly Colvin, Max Johnston, Francesco Ripa, Mriganka Mani Sinha, Amelia Pietropaolo, James Brewin, Christian Fiori, Ali Gozen, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With the introduction of novel treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), decision making regarding surgical management has become ever more complex. Factors such as clinical exposure, equipment availability, patient characteristics and hospital setting may affect what treatment is offered and an informed patient choice. The aim of this study was to investigate how urologists help patients make decisions regarding BPH management and whether their practice would differ if they were the patient themselves.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A 52-question survey presenting hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to European urologists and trainees/residents online and in person. In each scenario, regarding treatment options for BPH, the participant considered themselves firstly as the treating clinician and secondly as the patient themselves. Details regarding the participants' clinical experience, awareness of treatment options and exposure to these options were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 139 participants; 69.8% of whom were consultants, with 82.1% of participants having practiced urology for more than 5 years. A total of 59.7% of urologists consider themselves BPH specialists. Furthermore, 93.5% of those surveyed had performed transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), whilst procedures performed the least by participants were minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options. Only 17.3% had seen and 1.4% had performed all of the treatment options. When considering themselves as a patient within standard practice, there was a preference for HoLEP amongst participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of urologists surveyed had minimal experience to newer BPH techniques and MIST, suggesting that more exposure is required. A higher rate of HoLEP was chosen as a treatment option for urologists themselves as a patient than what they would choose as an option for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 2","pages":"243-255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428359/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01Epub Date: 2023-04-17DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.204
Alfredo Maria Bove, Aldo Brassetti, Mario Ochoa, Umberto Anceschi, Simone D'Annunzio, Marilia Ferriero, Gabriele Tuderti, Leonardo Misuraca, Riccardo Mastroianni, Silvia Cartolano, Giulia Torregiani, Riccardo Lombardo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giuseppe Simone
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) vs holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP). RASP and HOLEP are the treatments of choice for men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and a prostate ≥80 g, achieving comparable short and mid-term efficacy. No randomized controlled studies have proved the superiority of one technique over the other.
Material and methods: The prospectively maintained databases of the participating institutions were queried for patients with a prostate volume (PV) ≥80 g, who underwent surgery for BPO between 2011 and 2021. The study population was divided into two subgroups based on surgical approach. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 12 months outcomes were compared between groups: χ2 and Student t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Trifecta composite outcome (post-operative Q-max >15 ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) <8 and absence of complications) was used to define surgical quality and the two groups were compared accordingly. Logistic regression analyses investigated predictors of Trifecta achievement.
Results: We included 97 patients with comparable pre-operative features (all p >0.30): 43 underwent RASP, 54 HOLEP. Median PV was 102 g (IQR 89-120) and Q-max was 7.2 ml/s (IQR 5.4-9.0). The Trifecta rate was 43% overall, higher in the RASP subgroup (56% vs 33%; p = 0.02). The endoscopic approach was its only independent predictor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.016).
Conclusions: At univariable regression analysis, surgical approach was the only independent predictor of Trifecta achievement, which was significantly higher in the RASP group compared to HOLEP.
{"title":"Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.","authors":"Alfredo Maria Bove, Aldo Brassetti, Mario Ochoa, Umberto Anceschi, Simone D'Annunzio, Marilia Ferriero, Gabriele Tuderti, Leonardo Misuraca, Riccardo Mastroianni, Silvia Cartolano, Giulia Torregiani, Riccardo Lombardo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.204","DOIUrl":"10.5173/ceju.2023.204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) vs holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP). RASP and HOLEP are the treatments of choice for men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and a prostate ≥80 g, achieving comparable short and mid-term efficacy. No randomized controlled studies have proved the superiority of one technique over the other.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The prospectively maintained databases of the participating institutions were queried for patients with a prostate volume (PV) ≥80 g, who underwent surgery for BPO between 2011 and 2021. The study population was divided into two subgroups based on surgical approach. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 12 months outcomes were compared between groups: χ<sup>2</sup> and Student t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Trifecta composite outcome (post-operative Q-max >15 ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) <8 and absence of complications) was used to define surgical quality and the two groups were compared accordingly. Logistic regression analyses investigated predictors of Trifecta achievement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 97 patients with comparable pre-operative features (all p >0.30): 43 underwent RASP, 54 HOLEP. Median PV was 102 g (IQR 89-120) and Q-max was 7.2 ml/s (IQR 5.4-9.0). The Trifecta rate was 43% overall, higher in the RASP subgroup (56% vs 33%; p = 0.02). The endoscopic approach was its only independent predictor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At univariable regression analysis, surgical approach was the only independent predictor of Trifecta achievement, which was significantly higher in the RASP group compared to HOLEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"76 2","pages":"128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7e/a6/CEJU-76-204.PMC10357823.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9860923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Renal colic pain is considered one of the most excruciating pains ever experienced and ranks as one of the most common urological emergencies. Despite existing established recommendations, new therapies and their combinations are continuously being tested. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze and compare studies involving pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions used in the treatment of renal colic pain. Material and methods This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients. The quality and results of the included studies were assessed and discussed. Results This review provides an extensive analysis of 71 identified RCTs. Opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and dipyrone/metamizole have demonstrated effectiveness as single medications. Some evidence points to opioids having a potential disadvantage compared to others when used as a first-line single medication. Among the 63 studies exploring pharmacological therapy, 51 reported opioids utilization for rescue therapy in significant proportion of patients. Promising combination therapies involve the administration of an NSAID alongside opioids, ketamine, desmopressin, steroids, or nitric oxide. Conversely, spasmolytics, magnesium, and lidocaine exhibited limited or no additional effect. Noteworthy methodological shortcomings encompass a low pain threshold during participant recruitment and the reliance on pain reduction rather than complete pain elimination as an endpoint. Conclusions Frequent use of opioids as rescue medications in RCTs undermine their conclusions on effectiness of other therapeutics. Combination therapies should be considered as first choice in renal colic pain management. RCTs should define success of therapy as achieving complete or near-complete pain relief rather than pain reduction.
{"title":"Methodology and findings of randomized clinical trials on pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions to treat renal colic pain – a review","authors":"","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.92","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.92","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Renal colic pain is considered one of the most excruciating pains ever experienced and ranks as one of the most common urological emergencies. Despite existing established recommendations, new therapies and their combinations are continuously being tested. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze and compare studies involving pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions used in the treatment of renal colic pain. Material and methods This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult patients. The quality and results of the included studies were assessed and discussed. Results This review provides an extensive analysis of 71 identified RCTs. Opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and dipyrone/metamizole have demonstrated effectiveness as single medications. Some evidence points to opioids having a potential disadvantage compared to others when used as a first-line single medication. Among the 63 studies exploring pharmacological therapy, 51 reported opioids utilization for rescue therapy in significant proportion of patients. Promising combination therapies involve the administration of an NSAID alongside opioids, ketamine, desmopressin, steroids, or nitric oxide. Conversely, spasmolytics, magnesium, and lidocaine exhibited limited or no additional effect. Noteworthy methodological shortcomings encompass a low pain threshold during participant recruitment and the reliance on pain reduction rather than complete pain elimination as an endpoint. Conclusions Frequent use of opioids as rescue medications in RCTs undermine their conclusions on effectiness of other therapeutics. Combination therapies should be considered as first choice in renal colic pain management. RCTs should define success of therapy as achieving complete or near-complete pain relief rather than pain reduction.","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135602438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncological results of patients with the diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and subsequent adjuvant (ART) or salvage radiotherapy (SRT).
Material and methods: A total of 145 patients underwent open RRP for prostate cancer and subsequent ART or SRT postoperatively between 2010 and 2019. ART (n = 56) is defined as the group of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/mL or with positive lymph nodes without PSA increase who received radiotherapy within the first 6 months of urinary continence. SRT (n = 89) is defined as the group of patients with PSA >0.2 ng/mL who received RT before PSA amounted to 0.5 ng/mL.
Results: Statistically no significant difference was found between groups in terms of age, prostate volume, final pathology Gleason scores, lymphadenectomy, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), time to relapse after radiotherapy, development of biochemical recurrence and disease progression. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin positivity were significantly higher in the ART group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of biochemical recurrence-free survival, while cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates were significantly higher in the SRT group.
Conclusions: It was found that cancer-specific and overall survival was better in the SRT group. It will be more appropriate to follow-up until the recurrence and then to perform SRT after the relapse in the postoperative period.
{"title":"Oncologic outcomes of postoperative adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer.","authors":"Furkan Şendoğan, Turgay Turan, Ferhat Keser, Tayfun Hancilar, Gokhan Atis, Asif Yildirim","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the long-term oncological results of patients with the diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and subsequent adjuvant (ART) or salvage radiotherapy (SRT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 145 patients underwent open RRP for prostate cancer and subsequent ART or SRT postoperatively between 2010 and 2019. ART (n = 56) is defined as the group of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/mL or with positive lymph nodes without PSA increase who received radiotherapy within the first 6 months of urinary continence. SRT (n = 89) is defined as the group of patients with PSA >0.2 ng/mL who received RT before PSA amounted to 0.5 ng/mL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically no significant difference was found between groups in terms of age, prostate volume, final pathology Gleason scores, lymphadenectomy, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), time to relapse after radiotherapy, development of biochemical recurrence and disease progression. Extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin positivity were significantly higher in the ART group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of biochemical recurrence-free survival, while cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates were significantly higher in the SRT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was found that cancer-specific and overall survival was better in the SRT group. It will be more appropriate to follow-up until the recurrence and then to perform SRT after the relapse in the postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"76 2","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/21/55/CEJU-76-190.PMC10357821.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9864198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Umberto Anceschi, Michele Morelli, Rocco Simone Flammia, Aldo Brassetti, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Antonio Galfano, Stefano Tappero, Enrico Vecchio, Marco Martiriggiano, Lorenzo Giuseppe Luciani, Isabella Sperduti, Simone Albisinni, Gabriele Tuderti, Francesco Prata, Maria Consiglia Ferriero, Alfredo Maria Bove, Riccardo Mastroianni, Giuseppe Spadaro, Andrea Russo, Daniele Mattevi, Antonio Tufano, Costantino Leonardo, Riccardo Lombardo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Tommaso Cai, Thierry Quackels, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi, Giuseppe Simone
Introduction: The aim of this series was to evaluate predictors of Proficiency score (PS) achievement on a multicentric series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) performed by trainee surgeons with two different surgical techniques at four tertiary-care centers.
Material and methods: Four institutional datasets were merged and queried for RARPs performed by surgeons during their learning curve (LC) between 2010 and 2020 using two different approaches (Group A, Retzius-sparing RARP, n = 164; Group B, standard anterograde RARP, n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PS achievement for the overall trainee cohort. For all analyses, a two-sided p <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Group B showed significantly increased median operative time, positive surgical margins (PSM) status, increased number of nerve-sparing procedures, shorter LC time (each p <0.04). PS, continence status, potency, biochemical recurrence and 1-year trifecta rates were comparable between groups (each p >0.3). On multivariable analysis, time from LC starting ≥12 months (OR = 2.79; 95%IC [1.15-6.76]; p = 0.02) and a nerve-sparing intent (OR = 3.18; 95%IC [1.15-8.77]; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of PS score achievement (Table 3).
Conclusions: Higher PS rates for RARP trainees may be expected after 12 months from LC beginning. Short-term training courses are unlikely to confer proper surgical training, while long-term structured training programs seem to be beneficial on perioperative outcomes.
{"title":"Predictors of trainees' proficiency during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at high- -volume institutions: results from a multicentric series.","authors":"Umberto Anceschi, Michele Morelli, Rocco Simone Flammia, Aldo Brassetti, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Antonio Galfano, Stefano Tappero, Enrico Vecchio, Marco Martiriggiano, Lorenzo Giuseppe Luciani, Isabella Sperduti, Simone Albisinni, Gabriele Tuderti, Francesco Prata, Maria Consiglia Ferriero, Alfredo Maria Bove, Riccardo Mastroianni, Giuseppe Spadaro, Andrea Russo, Daniele Mattevi, Antonio Tufano, Costantino Leonardo, Riccardo Lombardo, Cosimo De Nunzio, Tommaso Cai, Thierry Quackels, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi, Giuseppe Simone","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this series was to evaluate predictors of Proficiency score (PS) achievement on a multicentric series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) performed by trainee surgeons with two different surgical techniques at four tertiary-care centers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four institutional datasets were merged and queried for RARPs performed by surgeons during their learning curve (LC) between 2010 and 2020 using two different approaches (Group A, Retzius-sparing RARP, n = 164; Group B, standard anterograde RARP, n = 79). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of PS achievement for the overall trainee cohort. For all analyses, a two-sided p <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group B showed significantly increased median operative time, positive surgical margins (PSM) status, increased number of nerve-sparing procedures, shorter LC time (each p <0.04). PS, continence status, potency, biochemical recurrence and 1-year trifecta rates were comparable between groups (each p >0.3). On multivariable analysis, time from LC starting ≥12 months (OR = 2.79; 95%IC [1.15-6.76]; p = 0.02) and a nerve-sparing intent (OR = 3.18; 95%IC [1.15-8.77]; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of PS score achievement (Table 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher PS rates for RARP trainees may be expected after 12 months from LC beginning. Short-term training courses are unlikely to confer proper surgical training, while long-term structured training programs seem to be beneficial on perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"76 1","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/3a/CEJU-76-260.PMC10091888.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9309522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}