首页 > 最新文献

Chest最新文献

英文 中文
Hospital-Treated Infectious Diseases, Infection Burden, and Risk of Lung Cancer: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study. 医院治疗的传染病、感染负担和肺癌风险:一项观察性和孟德尔随机研究。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3811
Jiazhen Zheng, Jinghan Huang, Quan Yang, Rui Zhou, Yining Huang, Xianbo Wu, Shaojun Tang

Background: Although infections play a role in the development of lung cancer, the longitudinal association between infection and the risk of lung cancer is disputed, and data relating to pathogen types and infection sites are sparse.

Research question: How do infections affect subsequent lung cancer risk, and is the impact limited to specific microbes rather than infection burden?

Study design and methods: Data on > 900 infectious diseases were gathered from the UK Biobank study. Short- and long-term effects of infections were assessed by using time-varying Cox proportional hazards models. The analysis was repeated, excluding patients with concurrent multi-pathogen infections or outcomes within the 10 years following the initial hospitalization for the index infection. A life table approach was used to estimate years of life lost from lung cancer. Infection burden was defined as the sum of the number of infection episodes over time and co-occurring infections. The genome-wide association studies used in two-sample Mendelian randomization were obtained from mostly European ancestry.

Results: Hospital-treated infectious disease was associated with a greater risk of lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.74-1.83). aHRs for lung cancer ranged from 1.39 to 2.82 across pathogen types. The impact of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) on lung cancer was the strongest, with an aHR of 3.22 (95% CI, 2.64-3.92); the aHR for extra-LRTIs was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.16-1.44). A dose-response association was observed between infection burden and lung cancer risk across different FEV1 percent predicted (Ptrend < .001). Multiple infections led to significant life lost from lung cancer at the age of 50 years. Mendelian randomization analysis reaffirmed the causal association.

Interpretation: Both observational and genetic analyses suggest that infectious diseases could increase the risk of lung cancer. The dual perspective on the LRTIs and extra-LRTIs impacts may inform lung cancer prevention strategies.

背景:尽管感染在肺癌的发病中起着一定的作用,但感染与肺癌风险之间的纵向联系却存在争议,而且与病原体类型和感染部位有关的数据也很稀少:研究问题:感染如何影响后续肺癌风险,这种影响是否仅限于特定微生物而非感染负担?我们从英国生物库研究中确定了900多种感染性疾病。使用时变 Cox 比例危险模型评估感染的短期和长期影响。在排除了同时患有多种病原体感染的患者或在初次住院感染后十年内出现结果的患者后,重复进行了分析。生命表用于估算肺癌造成的生命损失年数。感染负担被定义为一段时间内感染发作次数和并发感染次数的总和。双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)中使用的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)主要来自欧洲血统:结果:医院治疗的感染性疾病与肺癌的高风险相关(调整后 HR [aHR] 1.79 [95% CI 1.74-1.83])。下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)对肺癌的影响最大,aHR 为 3.22 [95% CI 2.64-3.92],而 LRTIs 以外的 aHR 为 1.29 [1.16-1.44])。在不同的 FEV1% 预测值中,感染负担与肺癌风险之间存在剂量反应关系(p-趋势解释):观察性分析和基因分析均表明,传染病会增加肺癌风险。从长程肺部感染和长程肺部感染外影响的双重角度来看,可为肺癌预防策略提供参考。
{"title":"Hospital-Treated Infectious Diseases, Infection Burden, and Risk of Lung Cancer: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Jiazhen Zheng, Jinghan Huang, Quan Yang, Rui Zhou, Yining Huang, Xianbo Wu, Shaojun Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3811","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although infections play a role in the development of lung cancer, the longitudinal association between infection and the risk of lung cancer is disputed, and data relating to pathogen types and infection sites are sparse.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do infections affect subsequent lung cancer risk, and is the impact limited to specific microbes rather than infection burden?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Data on > 900 infectious diseases were gathered from the UK Biobank study. Short- and long-term effects of infections were assessed by using time-varying Cox proportional hazards models. The analysis was repeated, excluding patients with concurrent multi-pathogen infections or outcomes within the 10 years following the initial hospitalization for the index infection. A life table approach was used to estimate years of life lost from lung cancer. Infection burden was defined as the sum of the number of infection episodes over time and co-occurring infections. The genome-wide association studies used in two-sample Mendelian randomization were obtained from mostly European ancestry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospital-treated infectious disease was associated with a greater risk of lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.74-1.83). aHRs for lung cancer ranged from 1.39 to 2.82 across pathogen types. The impact of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) on lung cancer was the strongest, with an aHR of 3.22 (95% CI, 2.64-3.92); the aHR for extra-LRTIs was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.16-1.44). A dose-response association was observed between infection burden and lung cancer risk across different FEV<sub>1</sub> percent predicted (P<sub>trend</sub> < .001). Multiple infections led to significant life lost from lung cancer at the age of 50 years. Mendelian randomization analysis reaffirmed the causal association.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Both observational and genetic analyses suggest that infectious diseases could increase the risk of lung cancer. The dual perspective on the LRTIs and extra-LRTIs impacts may inform lung cancer prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"270-282"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141859178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender Differences in Outcomes of Ambulatory and Hospitalized Patients With Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. 肥胖换气不足综合征门诊和住院病人治疗效果的性别差异。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.002
Nathan C Nowalk, Babak Mokhlesi, Julie M Neborak, Juan Fernando Masa Jimenez, Ivan Benitez, Francisco J Gomez de Terreros, Auxiliadora Romero, Candela Caballero-Eraso, Maria F Troncoso, Mónica González, Soledad López-Martín, José M Marin, Sergi Martí, Trinidad Díaz-Cambriles, Eusebi Chiner, Carlos Egea, Isabel Utrabo, Ferran Barbe, Maria Ángeles Sánchez-Quiroga

Background: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There are few data on whether there are gender differences in outcomes.

Research question: Do women with OHS experience worse outcomes in ambulatory and hospitalized settings compared to men?

Study design and methods: Post hoc analyses were performed on two separate OHS cohorts: (1) stable ambulatory patients from the two Pickwick randomized controlled trials; and (2) hospitalized patients with acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from a retrospective international cohort. We first conducted bivariate analyses of baseline characteristics and therapeutics between genders. Variables of interest from these analyses were then grouped into linear mixed effects models, Cox proportional hazards models, or logistic regression models to assess the association of gender on various clinical outcomes.

Results: The ambulatory prospective cohort included 300 patients (64% self-identified as women), and the hospitalized retrospective cohort included 1,162 patients (58% self-identified as women). For both cohorts, women were significantly older and more obese than men. Compared with men, baseline Paco2 was similar in ambulatory patients but higher in hospitalized women. In the ambulatory cohort, in unadjusted analysis, women had increased risk of emergency department visits. However, gender was not associated with the composite outcome of emergency department visit, hospitalization, or all-cause mortality in the fully adjusted model. In the hospitalized cohort, prescription of positive airway pressure was less prevalent in women at discharge. In unadjusted analysis, hospitalized women had a higher mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months following hospital discharge compared with men. However, after adjusting for age, gender was not associated with mortality.

Interpretation: Our findings indicate that although the diagnosis of OHS is established at a more advanced age in women, gender is not independently associated with worse clinical outcomes after adjusting for age. Future studies are needed to examine gender-related health disparities in diagnosis and treatment of OHS.

背景:肥胖低通气综合征(OHS)与高发病率和高死亡率有关。关于预后是否存在性别差异的数据很少。研究问题:女性是否与肥胖低通气综合征门诊和住院患者较差的预后有关?我们对两组不同的 OHS 患者进行了事后分析:1)来自两项皮克维克随机对照试验的稳定的非卧床患者;2)来自一项回顾性国际队列的急性-慢性高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭住院患者。我们首先对不同性别的基线特征和治疗方法进行了双变量分析。然后将这些分析中的相关变量分组到线性混合效应模型、Cox 比例危险模型或逻辑回归模型中,以评估性别与各种临床结果的关系:流动前瞻性队列包括 300 名患者(64% 为女性),住院回顾性队列包括 1 162 名患者(58% 为女性)。在这两个队列中,女性的年龄和肥胖程度都明显高于男性。与男性相比,非住院患者的基线 PaCO2 与男性相似,但住院女性的基线 PaCO2 较高。在门诊队列中,未经调整的分析显示,女性看急诊的风险更高。然而,在完全调整模型中,性别与急诊就诊、住院或全因死亡率的综合结果无关。在住院患者队列中,女性出院时较少使用气道正压(PAP)处方。在未经调整的分析中,与男性相比,住院女性在出院后 3、6 和 12 个月的死亡率较高。然而,在对年龄进行调整后,性别与死亡率无关:解释:虽然女性确诊 OHS 的年龄较高,但在调整年龄因素后,性别与较差的临床结果并无独立关联。今后还需要开展研究,探讨在诊断和治疗 OHS 方面与性别相关的健康差异。
{"title":"Gender Differences in Outcomes of Ambulatory and Hospitalized Patients With Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome.","authors":"Nathan C Nowalk, Babak Mokhlesi, Julie M Neborak, Juan Fernando Masa Jimenez, Ivan Benitez, Francisco J Gomez de Terreros, Auxiliadora Romero, Candela Caballero-Eraso, Maria F Troncoso, Mónica González, Soledad López-Martín, José M Marin, Sergi Martí, Trinidad Díaz-Cambriles, Eusebi Chiner, Carlos Egea, Isabel Utrabo, Ferran Barbe, Maria Ángeles Sánchez-Quiroga","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There are few data on whether there are gender differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do women with OHS experience worse outcomes in ambulatory and hospitalized settings compared to men?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Post hoc analyses were performed on two separate OHS cohorts: (1) stable ambulatory patients from the two Pickwick randomized controlled trials; and (2) hospitalized patients with acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure from a retrospective international cohort. We first conducted bivariate analyses of baseline characteristics and therapeutics between genders. Variables of interest from these analyses were then grouped into linear mixed effects models, Cox proportional hazards models, or logistic regression models to assess the association of gender on various clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ambulatory prospective cohort included 300 patients (64% self-identified as women), and the hospitalized retrospective cohort included 1,162 patients (58% self-identified as women). For both cohorts, women were significantly older and more obese than men. Compared with men, baseline Paco<sub>2</sub> was similar in ambulatory patients but higher in hospitalized women. In the ambulatory cohort, in unadjusted analysis, women had increased risk of emergency department visits. However, gender was not associated with the composite outcome of emergency department visit, hospitalization, or all-cause mortality in the fully adjusted model. In the hospitalized cohort, prescription of positive airway pressure was less prevalent in women at discharge. In unadjusted analysis, hospitalized women had a higher mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months following hospital discharge compared with men. However, after adjusting for age, gender was not associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that although the diagnosis of OHS is established at a more advanced age in women, gender is not independently associated with worse clinical outcomes after adjusting for age. Future studies are needed to examine gender-related health disparities in diagnosis and treatment of OHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"245-258"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality in Patients With Sepsis Treated With Esmolol or Landiolol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis. 脓毒症患者接受艾司洛尔或兰地洛尔治疗后的死亡率:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析以及试验顺序分析。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.020
Ryota Sato, Simone Messina, Daisuke Hasegawa, Cristina Santonocito, Giulia Scimonello, Giulia Sanfilippo, Andrea Morelli, Siddharth Dugar, Filippo Sanfilippo

Background: The latest meta-analysis indicated potential survival benefits from ultra-short-acting β-blockers in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, subsequent multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting findings, prompting the need for an updated meta-analysis to incorporate these newly published RCTs.

Research question: Does the use of ultra-short-acting β-blockers (esmolol or landiolol) in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia improve mortality?

Study design and methods: We conducted an updated systematic search through April 2, 2024, exploring the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases for RCTs reporting mortality in adult patients with sepsis treated with esmolol or landiolol as compared with those treated with neither of these or receiving placebo and published in English. Meta-analyses were conducted with the random effects model. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up, with subgroup analysis separating single-center RCTS from large multicenter RCTs.

Results: Eight RCTs (885 patients) were included in the primary analysis. Ultra-short-acting β-blockers did not improve mortality significantly at the longest follow-up (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = .08; I2 = 51%; very low certainty of the evidence) and 28-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P = .05; I2 = 62%). Subgroup analyses of mortality outcomes pointed toward different results between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Trial sequence analyses showed that both mortality outcomes were not robust. The sensitivity analyses suggested a significant reduction in mortality by adding RCTs published in non-English languages.

Interpretation: In this updated meta-analysis, the use of esmolol or landiolol did not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, results were not robust and outcomes differed between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Moreover, sensitivity analyses showed the fragility of the primary outcome. Further studies regarding ultra-short-acting β-blockers with advanced cardiac monitoring or serial echocardiography are warranted.

Trial registry: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42024503570; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

背景:最新的荟萃分析表明,超短效β受体阻滞剂对持续性心动过速的脓毒症患者具有潜在的生存益处。然而,随后的多中心随机对照试验(RCT)报告了相互矛盾的结果,因此需要更新荟萃分析以纳入这些新发表的 RCT:研究问题:在持续性心动过速的脓毒症患者中使用超短效β受体阻滞剂(艾司洛尔或兰地洛尔)是否能提高死亡率?截至 2024 年 4 月 2 日,我们在 MEDLINE、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Embase 上进行了最新的系统性检索,以检索报告脓毒症成人患者接受艾司洛尔或兰地洛尔治疗后死亡率的 RCT(与未接受治疗或安慰剂相比),并以英文发表。采用随机效应模型进行了元分析。主要结果是随访时间最长时的死亡率,亚组分析将单项研究与大型多中心研究区分开来:8项研究(885名患者)被纳入主要分析。超短效β受体阻滞剂并未显著改善最长随访期死亡率(风险比 [RR] 0.84;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.68-1.02;P=0.08,I2=51%,证据确定性极低)和 28 天死亡率(RR 0.77;95%CI 0.59-1.00;P=0.05;I2=62%)。死亡率结果的分组分析表明,单中心和多中心 RCT 的结果不同。试验序列分析(TSA)显示,两种死亡率结果都不稳健。敏感性分析表明,加入以非英语发表的临床试验后,死亡率显著降低:在这项最新的荟萃分析中,使用艾司洛尔或兰地洛尔并未降低持续性心动过速脓毒症患者的死亡率。然而,结果并不可靠,单中心和多中心临床试验的结果也不尽相同。此外,敏感性分析表明了主要结果的脆弱性。临床试验注册:该方案于 2024 年 1 月 31 日在 PROSPERO 数据库中进行了预防性注册(注册号:CRD:42024503570)。
{"title":"Mortality in Patients With Sepsis Treated With Esmolol or Landiolol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis.","authors":"Ryota Sato, Simone Messina, Daisuke Hasegawa, Cristina Santonocito, Giulia Scimonello, Giulia Sanfilippo, Andrea Morelli, Siddharth Dugar, Filippo Sanfilippo","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest meta-analysis indicated potential survival benefits from ultra-short-acting β-blockers in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, subsequent multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting findings, prompting the need for an updated meta-analysis to incorporate these newly published RCTs.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the use of ultra-short-acting β-blockers (esmolol or landiolol) in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia improve mortality?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted an updated systematic search through April 2, 2024, exploring the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases for RCTs reporting mortality in adult patients with sepsis treated with esmolol or landiolol as compared with those treated with neither of these or receiving placebo and published in English. Meta-analyses were conducted with the random effects model. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up, with subgroup analysis separating single-center RCTS from large multicenter RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs (885 patients) were included in the primary analysis. Ultra-short-acting β-blockers did not improve mortality significantly at the longest follow-up (risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = .08; I<sup>2</sup> = 51%; very low certainty of the evidence) and 28-day mortality (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P = .05; I<sup>2</sup> = 62%). Subgroup analyses of mortality outcomes pointed toward different results between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Trial sequence analyses showed that both mortality outcomes were not robust. The sensitivity analyses suggested a significant reduction in mortality by adding RCTs published in non-English languages.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In this updated meta-analysis, the use of esmolol or landiolol did not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, results were not robust and outcomes differed between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Moreover, sensitivity analyses showed the fragility of the primary outcome. Further studies regarding ultra-short-acting β-blockers with advanced cardiac monitoring or serial echocardiography are warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registry: </strong>International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42024503570; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"121-138"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142092460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Severe Pneumonia With Pneumocystis jirovecii Colonization: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study. 伴有肺孢子虫定植的重症肺炎患者的临床特征和预后:一项多中心回顾性研究。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.140
Yongpo Jiang, Xiaohan Huang, Huili Zhou, Mingqiang Wang, Shengfeng Wang, Xindie Ren, Guojun He, Jun Xu, Qianqian Wang, Muhua Dai, Yonghui Xiong, Lin Zhong, Xuwei He, Xuntao Deng, Yujie Pan, Yinghe Xu, Hongliu Cai, Shengwei Jin, Hongyu Wang, Lingtong Huang

Background: For decades, the incidence and clinical characteristics of Pneumocystis jirovecii colonization in patients with severe pneumonia was unclear.

Research question: What are the clinical features and outcomes associated with P jirovecii colonization in individuals diagnosed with severe pneumonia?

Study design and methods: In this multicenter, retrospective, matched study, patients with severe pneumonia who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage clinical metagenomics from 2019 to 2023 in the ICUs of 17 medical centers were enrolled. Patients were diagnosed based on clinical metagenomics, pulmonary CT scans, and clinical presentations. Clinical data were collected retrospectively, and according to propensity score matching and Cox multivariate regression analysis, the prognosis of patients with P jirovecii colonization was compared with that of patients who were P jirovecii-negative.

Results: A total of 40% of P jirovecii-positive patients are considered to have P jirovecii colonization. The P jirovecii colonization group had a higher proportion of patients with immunosuppression and a lower lymphocyte count than the P jirovecii-negative group. More frequent detection of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus-6B, human herpesvirus-7, and torque teno virus in the lungs was associated with P jirovecii colonization than with P jirovecii negativity. By constructing two cohorts through propensity score matching, we incorporated codetected microorganisms and clinical features into a Cox proportional hazards model and revealed that P jirovecii colonization was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with severe pneumonia. According to sensitivity analyses, which included or excluded codetected microorganisms, and patients not receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, similar conclusions were reached.

Interpretation: Immunosuppression and a reduced lymphocyte count were identified as risk factors for P jirovecii colonization in patients with non-Pneumocystis pneumonia. More frequent detection of various viruses was observed in patients colonized with P jirovecii, and P jirovecii colonization was associated with an increased 28-day mortality in patients with severe pneumonia.

背景:几十年来,重症肺炎患者中若韦氏肺孢子菌(P. jirovecii)定植的发生率和临床特征仍不清楚:研究问题:在确诊为重症肺炎的患者中,与 P. jirovecii 定植相关的临床特征和结果是什么?在这项多中心、回顾性、配对研究中,纳入了2019年至2023年期间在17个医疗中心的重症监护室接受支气管肺泡灌洗临床元基因组学检查的重症肺炎患者。根据临床元基因组学、肺部 CT 扫描和临床表现对患者进行诊断。回顾性收集临床数据,根据倾向得分匹配和Cox多元回归分析,比较了P. jirovecii定植患者与P. jirovecii阴性患者的预后:结果:40%的P. jirovecii阳性患者被认为有P. jirovecii定植。与 P. jiroveci 阴性组相比,P. jirovecii 定植组中免疫抑制患者比例更高,淋巴细胞计数更低。肺部巨细胞病毒、爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒、人类疱疹病毒-6B、人类疱疹病毒-7 和 torque teno 病毒的检测频率与 P. jirovecii 定植相关,而与 P. jirovecii 阴性相关。通过倾向得分匹配建立两个队列,我们将编码检测到的微生物和临床特征纳入 Cox 比例危险度模型,结果显示,P. jirovecii 定植是重症肺炎患者死亡的独立危险因素。根据敏感性分析(包括或不包括检测到的微生物以及未接受TMP-SMX治疗的患者),也得出了类似的结论:解读:免疫抑制和淋巴细胞计数减少被认为是非肺结核患者感染嗜血杆菌的风险因素。在P. jirovecii定植患者中更频繁地检测到各种病毒,P. jirovecii定植与重症肺炎患者28天死亡率的增加有关。
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Severe Pneumonia With Pneumocystis jirovecii Colonization: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yongpo Jiang, Xiaohan Huang, Huili Zhou, Mingqiang Wang, Shengfeng Wang, Xindie Ren, Guojun He, Jun Xu, Qianqian Wang, Muhua Dai, Yonghui Xiong, Lin Zhong, Xuwei He, Xuntao Deng, Yujie Pan, Yinghe Xu, Hongliu Cai, Shengwei Jin, Hongyu Wang, Lingtong Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.140","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.140","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For decades, the incidence and clinical characteristics of Pneumocystis jirovecii colonization in patients with severe pneumonia was unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the clinical features and outcomes associated with P jirovecii colonization in individuals diagnosed with severe pneumonia?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>In this multicenter, retrospective, matched study, patients with severe pneumonia who underwent bronchoalveolar lavage clinical metagenomics from 2019 to 2023 in the ICUs of 17 medical centers were enrolled. Patients were diagnosed based on clinical metagenomics, pulmonary CT scans, and clinical presentations. Clinical data were collected retrospectively, and according to propensity score matching and Cox multivariate regression analysis, the prognosis of patients with P jirovecii colonization was compared with that of patients who were P jirovecii-negative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40% of P jirovecii-positive patients are considered to have P jirovecii colonization. The P jirovecii colonization group had a higher proportion of patients with immunosuppression and a lower lymphocyte count than the P jirovecii-negative group. More frequent detection of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus-6B, human herpesvirus-7, and torque teno virus in the lungs was associated with P jirovecii colonization than with P jirovecii negativity. By constructing two cohorts through propensity score matching, we incorporated codetected microorganisms and clinical features into a Cox proportional hazards model and revealed that P jirovecii colonization was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with severe pneumonia. According to sensitivity analyses, which included or excluded codetected microorganisms, and patients not receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, similar conclusions were reached.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Immunosuppression and a reduced lymphocyte count were identified as risk factors for P jirovecii colonization in patients with non-Pneumocystis pneumonia. More frequent detection of various viruses was observed in patients colonized with P jirovecii, and P jirovecii colonization was associated with an increased 28-day mortality in patients with severe pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"54-66"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal Changes in Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COPD. 慢性阻塞性肺病患者最大用力吸气流量的纵向变化与临床疗效。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162
Dong Hyun Kim, Eun-Tae Jeon, Hyo Jin Lee, Heemoon Park, Jung-Kyu Lee, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Hyun Woo Lee

Background: COPD primarily impairs expiratory flow due to progressive airflow obstruction and reduced lung elasticity. Increasing evidence underlines the importance of inspiratory flow as a biomarker for selecting inhaler devices and providing ancillary aerodynamic information.

Research question: Do the longitudinal changes in maximum forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) influence acute exacerbations and lung function decline in patients with COPD?

Study design and methods: This longitudinal study evaluated FIFmax in patients with COPD over a 7-year period from 2004 to 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on FIFmax trajectory: the increased FIFmax group and the decreased FIFmax group. The study assessed the annual rate of acute exacerbations and the annual decline rate of FEV1. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment status, with a focus on inhaled therapy and inhaler device usage.

Results: Among the eligible 956 patients with COPD, 56.5% belonged to the increased FIFmax group. After propensity score matching, the increased FIFmax group experienced lower rates of severe exacerbations (0.16 per year vs 0.25 per year, P = .017) and a slower decline in FEV1 (0 [interquartile range, -51 to 71] mL/y vs -43 [interquartile range, -119 to 6] mL/y; P < .001) compared with the decreased FIFmax group. These associations were particularly prominent in patients using specific inhaler therapies such as dry powder inhalers.

Interpretation: This study showed that the longitudinal changes in FIFmax are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. Patients with increased FIFmax experienced a lower rate of severe exacerbations and a slower decline in lung function. These findings suggest the potential benefits of optimizing inspiratory flow in COPD management, although further studies are needed to confirm these observations due to potential confounding factors.

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)主要是由于进行性气流阻塞和肺弹性降低而影响呼气流量。越来越多的证据表明,吸气流量是选择吸入器设备和提供辅助空气动力学信息的重要生物标志物:研究问题:最大强制吸气流量(FIFmax)的纵向变化是否会影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的急性加重和肺功能下降?这项纵向研究观察了慢性阻塞性肺病患者的最大用力吸气流量(FIFmax),时间跨度为 2004 年至 2020 年,为期 7 年。根据 FIFmax 的轨迹将符合条件的患者分为两组:FIFmax 增加组和 FIFmax 减少组。我们的研究评估了急性加重的年发生率和1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的年下降率。根据治疗情况进行了分组分析,重点是吸入疗法和吸入器械的使用情况:在符合条件的 956 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,56.5% 属于 FIFmax 增加组。经过倾向得分匹配后,FIFmax 增加组的严重病情加重率较低(0.16/年 vs. 0.25/年,P 值=0.017),FEV1 下降速度较慢(0 [四分位距(IQR),-51-71] vs. -43 [四分位距(IQR),-119-6] ml/年,P 值解释:我们的研究表明,FIFmax 的纵向变化与 COPD 患者的临床预后有关。FIFmax增加的患者严重恶化的发生率较低,肺功能下降的速度较慢。这些发现表明,在慢性阻塞性肺病的治疗中优化吸气流量具有潜在的益处,但由于潜在的混杂因素,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些观察结果。
{"title":"Longitudinal Changes in Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COPD.","authors":"Dong Hyun Kim, Eun-Tae Jeon, Hyo Jin Lee, Heemoon Park, Jung-Kyu Lee, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Hyun Woo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD primarily impairs expiratory flow due to progressive airflow obstruction and reduced lung elasticity. Increasing evidence underlines the importance of inspiratory flow as a biomarker for selecting inhaler devices and providing ancillary aerodynamic information.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do the longitudinal changes in maximum forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) influence acute exacerbations and lung function decline in patients with COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This longitudinal study evaluated FIFmax in patients with COPD over a 7-year period from 2004 to 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on FIFmax trajectory: the increased FIFmax group and the decreased FIFmax group. The study assessed the annual rate of acute exacerbations and the annual decline rate of FEV<sub>1</sub>. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment status, with a focus on inhaled therapy and inhaler device usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eligible 956 patients with COPD, 56.5% belonged to the increased FIFmax group. After propensity score matching, the increased FIFmax group experienced lower rates of severe exacerbations (0.16 per year vs 0.25 per year, P = .017) and a slower decline in FEV<sub>1</sub> (0 [interquartile range, -51 to 71] mL/y vs -43 [interquartile range, -119 to 6] mL/y; P < .001) compared with the decreased FIFmax group. These associations were particularly prominent in patients using specific inhaler therapies such as dry powder inhalers.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study showed that the longitudinal changes in FIFmax are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. Patients with increased FIFmax experienced a lower rate of severe exacerbations and a slower decline in lung function. These findings suggest the potential benefits of optimizing inspiratory flow in COPD management, although further studies are needed to confirm these observations due to potential confounding factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141995383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sarcoidosis and Emergency Hospitalization. 肉样瘤病和急诊住院。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3839
Pierre Gazengel, Raphael Hindre, Florence Jeny, Sharon Mendes, Julien Caliez, Olivia Freynet, Cecile Rotenberg, Morgane Didier, Robin Dhote, Yves Cohen, Yurdagul Uzunhan, Diane Bouvry, Hilario Nunes

Background: Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic systemic granulomatosis whose evolution is self-limiting in most cases. However, it can progress to organ damage that menaces the vital or functional prognosis of patients. Sarcoidosis itself, but also its comorbidities, can pose a threat to the patient, require rapid initiation of treatment, and justify emergency hospitalization.

Research question: What are the reasons and prognosis of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency?

Study design and methods: The objectives of our study were to describe the causes of admission for and to identify predictors of mortality in patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency. This is a retrospective monocentric study. We included patients hospitalized after a stay in the ED or ICU, or requiring an unscheduled hospitalization after telephone advice or a consultation, between January 1, 2017, and July 7, 2020.

Results: We identified 154 patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency, among which 14 (9%) required the ICU. There were 81 male patients, with a median age of 55.0 years (interquartile range, 44.0-67.0). Sarcoidosis was inaugural in 20 patients (14%). The primary reason for hospitalization was lower respiratory infections in 32 patients (21%), followed by acute pulmonary exacerbation of sarcoidosis in 17 (11%), suspected cardiac sarcoidosis in 13 (8.4%), and neurosarcoidosis in 12 (7.7%). The median length of stay was 6 days (interquartile range, 3.00-10.0). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.9%. The 2-year transplantation-free survival after hospitalization was 86.8% (95% CI, 81.4-92.5). The factors associated with a worse transplantation-free survival were Charlson Comorbidity Index score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.61; P = .021), pulmonary hypertension (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.10-5.83; P = .029), and oxygen therapy during hospitalization (HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.55-11.29; P = .005).

Interpretation: Our findings indicate that the overall mortality of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency was high. The presence of comorbidities and the severity of respiratory failure, as reflected by oxygen requirement, are important prognostic determinants.

简介肉样瘤病是一种特发性系统性肉芽肿病,在大多数病例中,其演变具有自限性。然而,肉样瘤病可发展为器官损害,危及患者的生命或功能预后。肉样瘤病本身及其合并症会对患者造成威胁,需要迅速开始治疗,并有理由紧急住院:研究问题:肉样瘤病患者急诊住院的原因和预后如何?我们的研究目的是描述急诊住院的肉样瘤病患者的入院原因,并确定死亡率的预测因素。这是一项单一中心的回顾性研究。研究对象包括 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 7 日期间在急诊室或重症监护室(ICU)住院的患者,或经电话咨询或会诊后需要计划外住院的患者:我们确定了 154 名急诊住院的肉样瘤病患者,其中 14 人(9%)需要入住重症监护室。其中81人为男性,中位年龄为55.0 [44.0; 67.0]岁。20名患者(14%)患有肉样瘤病。32名(21%)患者住院的主要原因是下呼吸道感染,其次是肉样瘤病急性肺部恶化,17名(11%)、13名(8.4%)和12名(7.7%)患者怀疑是心脏肉样瘤病,还有12名(7.7%)患者怀疑是神经肉样瘤病。住院时间中位数为 6 [3.00; 10.0] 天。院内死亡率为 3.9%。住院后两年的无移植生存率为 86.8% [95% CI 81.4- 92.5]。与无移植生存率较差相关的因素有:Charlson合并症指数(HR=1.29 [95%CI=1.04-1.61]; p=0.021)、肺动脉高压(HR=2.53 [95%CI=1.10-5.83]; p=0.029)和住院期间的氧疗(HR=4.18 [95%CI=1.55-11.29]; p=0.005):急诊住院的肉样瘤病患者的总死亡率很高。解释:急诊住院的肉样瘤病患的总死亡率很高,合并症的存在和呼吸衰竭的严重程度(通过需氧量反映)是决定预后的重要因素。
{"title":"Sarcoidosis and Emergency Hospitalization.","authors":"Pierre Gazengel, Raphael Hindre, Florence Jeny, Sharon Mendes, Julien Caliez, Olivia Freynet, Cecile Rotenberg, Morgane Didier, Robin Dhote, Yves Cohen, Yurdagul Uzunhan, Diane Bouvry, Hilario Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3839","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3839","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcoidosis is an idiopathic systemic granulomatosis whose evolution is self-limiting in most cases. However, it can progress to organ damage that menaces the vital or functional prognosis of patients. Sarcoidosis itself, but also its comorbidities, can pose a threat to the patient, require rapid initiation of treatment, and justify emergency hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the reasons and prognosis of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>The objectives of our study were to describe the causes of admission for and to identify predictors of mortality in patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency. This is a retrospective monocentric study. We included patients hospitalized after a stay in the ED or ICU, or requiring an unscheduled hospitalization after telephone advice or a consultation, between January 1, 2017, and July 7, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 154 patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency, among which 14 (9%) required the ICU. There were 81 male patients, with a median age of 55.0 years (interquartile range, 44.0-67.0). Sarcoidosis was inaugural in 20 patients (14%). The primary reason for hospitalization was lower respiratory infections in 32 patients (21%), followed by acute pulmonary exacerbation of sarcoidosis in 17 (11%), suspected cardiac sarcoidosis in 13 (8.4%), and neurosarcoidosis in 12 (7.7%). The median length of stay was 6 days (interquartile range, 3.00-10.0). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.9%. The 2-year transplantation-free survival after hospitalization was 86.8% (95% CI, 81.4-92.5). The factors associated with a worse transplantation-free survival were Charlson Comorbidity Index score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.61; P = .021), pulmonary hypertension (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.10-5.83; P = .029), and oxygen therapy during hospitalization (HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.55-11.29; P = .005).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that the overall mortality of patients with sarcoidosis hospitalized in emergency was high. The presence of comorbidities and the severity of respiratory failure, as reflected by oxygen requirement, are important prognostic determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142104749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rebuttal From Dr Jones. 琼斯博士反驳。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.053
Barbara E Jones
{"title":"Rebuttal From Dr Jones.","authors":"Barbara E Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"167 1","pages":"32-33"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142964097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A 23-Year-Old Man With Multilobar Consolidation. 23岁男性多脑叶巩固。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.049
Ajay Kundu, Nitesh Gupta, Rohit Kumar, Pranav Ish, Manu Madan, Rajnish Kaushik, A J Mahendran

Case presentation: A 23-year-old man presented to the ED with a history of respiratory distress, cough, and fever for 10 days. He was evaluated in the ED, where he received a diagnosis of pulmonary edema, secondary to mitral regurgitation with mitral valve prolapse syndrome. He was treated with antibiotics and diuretics and discharged to home. Three months later, he returned to the ED with similar complaints, for which he was treated symptomatically and discharged. After 4 months, the patient once again appeared with worsening respiratory distress and cough with fever. The dyspnea was not accompanied by orthopnea, pedal edema, or palpitation. The patient was admitted to the medical ICU. He had no history of arthralgia, myalgia, skin rash, or other signs of autoimmune disease. He denied any history of smoking, work-related or occupational exposures, drug intake, or recent travel.

病例介绍:一名23岁男性,因呼吸窘迫、咳嗽和发烧10天就诊于急诊室。他在急诊科接受了评估,在那里他被诊断为肺水肿,继发于二尖瓣反流并二尖瓣脱垂综合征。他接受了抗生素和利尿剂治疗,出院回家。三个月后,他以类似的抱怨回到急诊科,对此他进行了对症治疗并出院。4个月后,患者再次出现呼吸窘迫加重,咳嗽伴发烧。呼吸困难不伴有直立呼吸、足部水肿或心悸。病人被送进重症监护室。他没有关节痛、肌痛、皮疹或其他自身免疫性疾病的症状。他否认有吸烟史,工作或职业接触史,吸毒史,近期旅行史。
{"title":"A 23-Year-Old Man With Multilobar Consolidation.","authors":"Ajay Kundu, Nitesh Gupta, Rohit Kumar, Pranav Ish, Manu Madan, Rajnish Kaushik, A J Mahendran","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 23-year-old man presented to the ED with a history of respiratory distress, cough, and fever for 10 days. He was evaluated in the ED, where he received a diagnosis of pulmonary edema, secondary to mitral regurgitation with mitral valve prolapse syndrome. He was treated with antibiotics and diuretics and discharged to home. Three months later, he returned to the ED with similar complaints, for which he was treated symptomatically and discharged. After 4 months, the patient once again appeared with worsening respiratory distress and cough with fever. The dyspnea was not accompanied by orthopnea, pedal edema, or palpitation. The patient was admitted to the medical ICU. He had no history of arthralgia, myalgia, skin rash, or other signs of autoimmune disease. He denied any history of smoking, work-related or occupational exposures, drug intake, or recent travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"167 1","pages":"e5-e8"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142964038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
One Step Closer to Personalized Management of Neuromuscular Respiratory Failure. 离神经肌肉性呼吸衰竭的个性化治疗更近一步。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.008
Thomas H Fox, Philip J Choi
{"title":"One Step Closer to Personalized Management of Neuromuscular Respiratory Failure.","authors":"Thomas H Fox, Philip J Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"167 1","pages":"14-15"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142964093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
POINT: Should Multiplex Molecular Panels Be Performed on All Patients With Community Acquired Pneumonia? Yes. 观点:是否应该对所有社区获得性肺炎患者进行多重分子检测?是。
IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.052
Chiagozie Pickens
{"title":"POINT: Should Multiplex Molecular Panels Be Performed on All Patients With Community Acquired Pneumonia? Yes.","authors":"Chiagozie Pickens","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"167 1","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142964096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Chest
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1