Case name: Zavada v. East Stroudsburg University, et al., No. 3:22-CV-01074 (M.D. Pa. 09/26/24).
Case name: Zavada v. East Stroudsburg University, et al., No. 3:22-CV-01074 (M.D. Pa. 09/26/24).
Case name: Schneidermesser v. NYU Grossman School of Medicine, No. 21 Civ. 7179 (S.D. N.Y. 09/10/24).
Case name: Maxius v. Mount Sinai Health Systems Inc., et al., No. 21 Civ. 10422 (S.D. N.Y. 09/12/24).
Case name: Reid v. James Madison University, et al., No. 5:21-cv-00032 (W.D. Va. 08/05/24).
Case name: Mulugu v. Duke University School of Medicine, et al., No. 1:23-CV-957 (M.D. N.C. 08/29/24).
Case name: Popat v. Levy, et al., 15-CV-01052 (W.D. N.Y. 08/05/24).
Case name: Patricio v. Towson University, No. 22-01454 (D. Md. 08/19/24).
Case name: Doe v. Syracuse University, et al., No. 5:21-CV-977 (N.D. N.Y. 08/02/24).
A family consumer science agent for the University of Arkansas claimed she experienced sex-based dis- crimination from her supervisor. The agent alleged that the supervisor frequently used misogynistic slurs to demean employees.
The NCAA, together with the Power Conferences, settled a series of federal antitrust lawsuits this past May by agreeing to establish a pay-for-play system for its Division I student-athletes. This new financial structure requires that colleges and universities share 20–22% of their athletics department revenue with their student-athletes, capped at $20 million per year. No part of the proposed settlement agreement addresses, however, how this new financial model would impact gender equity, which is noteworthy because of the ongoing debate as to whether Title IX applies to issues surrounding compensation.