Case name: Huang v. The Ohio State University, et al., No. 23-3469 (6th Cir. 08/28/24).
Case name: Huang v. The Ohio State University, et al., No. 23-3469 (6th Cir. 08/28/24).
Service dogs have become a common sight on and off campus. For dog lovers and non-dog lovers alike, these animals evoke respect for their training, obedience, and commitment to assisting their owners. For the former (myself included), it can be hard to see such a good boy or girl and not want to pet or interact with them.
Case name: Ward v. Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University, No. 22-220 (M.D. La. 09/20/24).
The Office for Civil Rights issued new resources for protecting students with cancer from discrimination on the basis of disability.
Case name: Smith v. Tulane University, et al., No. 24-392 (E.D. La. 07/31/24).
Case name: McLaughlin v. Taylor University, No. 1:23-cv-00527 (N.D. Ind. 09/23/24).
Case name: Crawford v. Bronx Community College, et al., No. 22 Civ. 1062 (S.D. N.Y. 08/21/24).
Case name: Burgess v. The New School University, et al., No. 23-cv-4944 (S.D. N.Y. 09/11/24).
A little more than a year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the most impactful ruling on religious accommodations in decades. Let's start with a little background for the case, which has implications for colleges and universities and other employers. Gerald Groff, a professed Christian and employee of the U.S. Postal Service declined to work on Sundays, citing his religious beliefs. USPS attempted to accommodate him by arranging for co-workers to exchange shifts, but there were multiple instances where employees weren’t available to trade. Groff didn’t report to work on those days, and USPS terminated his employment as a result.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：