Case name: Lee v. Foothill-De Anza Community College District, et al., No. 23-cv-03418 (N.D. Cal. 05/07/24).
Case name: Lee v. Foothill-De Anza Community College District, et al., No. 23-cv-03418 (N.D. Cal. 05/07/24).
Case name: Stalder v. Colorado Mesa University, et al., No. 23CA0311 (Colo. Ct. App. 03/28/24).
Case name: Penders v. Saint Edwards University Inc., No. 1:22-CV-178 (W.D. Tex. 03/18/24).
Case name: Johnson-Lee v. Texas A&M University — Corpus Christi, No. 2:23-CV-00229 (S.D. Tex. 04/11/24).
The Aug. 1, 2024 implementation date for the revised Title IX regulations is right around the corner. Since the rule's April 19 release, we’ve seen experts, media outlets, and others providing resources that are helpful, voluminous, or even confusing.
Case name: Abdelrasoul v. Trustees of Boston University, No. 24-10988 (D. Mass. 05/10/24).
Case name: Banga v. Kanios, et al., No. 16-cv-04270 (N.D. Cal. 04/30/24).
Title IX was originally enacted to protect college students from sex discrimination in educational programs or activities, including athletics. Specifically, Title IX states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” Keep this background information in mind as you read the following about a recent development that occurred in the Title IX arena.
Case name: Longerbeam v. Shepherd University, et al., No. 22-609 (W. Va. 04/11/24).
Case name: Ayach, et al. v. The Regents of the University of California, et al., No. B325545 (Cal. Ct. App. 04/30/24).