Free speech protections are embedded deeply within the campus experience. Naturally, students often exercise their protected speech rights in the form of protests and other on-campus demonstrations and events. However, student expression rights also extend to the classroom in the context of course discussions and writings. They can also extend off campus to social media posts.
{"title":"Court rules student's offensive posts on X didn’t justify forced exit","authors":"Eric Lyerly","doi":"10.1002/cala.70021","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Free speech protections are embedded deeply within the campus experience. Naturally, students often exercise their protected speech rights in the form of protests and other on-campus demonstrations and events. However, student expression rights also extend to the classroom in the context of course discussions and writings. They can also extend off campus to social media posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
CASE NAME:Muhammad v. The Trustees of Columbia University, et al., No. 24-cv-7852 (S.D. N.Y. 09/30/25).
案件名称:Muhammad v. The Trustees of Columbia University, et al, No. 24-cv-7852 (s.d.n.y. 09/30/25)。
{"title":"Judge rules against student","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>CASE NAME:</b> <i>Muhammad v. The Trustees of Columbia University, et al</i>., No. 24-cv-7852 (S.D. N.Y. 09/30/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An overview of the key topics faced by higher education professionals with citations to noteworthy cases, statutes, regulations, and additional sources.
概述了高等教育专业人员所面临的关键主题,并引用了值得注意的案例、法规、法规和其他来源。
{"title":"Review recent rulings involving faculty","authors":"Eric Lyerly","doi":"10.1002/cala.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>An overview of the key topics faced by higher education professionals with citations to noteworthy cases, statutes, regulations, and additional sources.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules against former employee","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>CASE NAME:</b> <i>Maxwell v. Tuskegee University</i>, No. 3:23-cv-472 (M.D. Ala. 09/25/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
CASE NAME:Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al., No. CV-25-01420 (D. Ariz. 10/28/25).
案例名称:高盛诉亚利桑那州校董会等人案。CV-25-01420(亚利桑那州,25年10月28日)。
{"title":"Judge rules in favor of former student","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70030","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>CASE NAME:</b> <i>Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al</i>., No. CV-25-01420 (D. Ariz. 10/28/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules against former employee","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>CASE NAME:</b> <i>Maxwell v. Tuskegee University</i>, No. 3:23-cv-472 (M.D. Ala. 09/25/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146083243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules against former employee","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
CASE NAME:Aarnes v. The Ohio State University, No. 2:24-cv-2146 (S.D. Ohio 09/25/25).
案例名称:Aarnes诉The Ohio State University, No. 2:24-cv-2146 (S.D. Ohio 09/25/25)。
{"title":"Judge rules against university","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.70036","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cala.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>CASE NAME:</b> <i>Aarnes v. The Ohio State University</i>, No. 2:24-cv-2146 (S.D. Ohio 09/25/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 6","pages":"13-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}