Case name: Moeinpour v. Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01302 (N.D. Ala. 05/14/24).
Case name: Moeinpour v. Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01302 (N.D. Ala. 05/14/24).
Case name: Stanley v. Phelon, et al., No. 23-731 (2d Cir. 04/04/24).
Case name: Doherty v. Bice, et al., No. 23-1217 (2d Cir. 05/10/24).
Case name: Hollis v. Morgan State University, et al., No. 19-cv-3555 (D. Md. 05/10/24).
Case name: Wells-Marshall v. Auburn University, et al., No. 3:22-cv-00086 (M.D. Ala. 06/06/24).
Case name: Dundee v. Geauga Medical Center, No. 23-3906 (6th Cir. 05/29/24).
Case name: McKnight, et al. v. Board of Governors of Glenville State University, et al., No. 23-ICA-345 (W.Va. Ct. App. 06/11/24).
The Student Conduct and Academic Integrity Office at the University of California Riverside received a report expressing concern for the health of a pledge in the Phi Gamma Delta fraternity. SCAIP began an investigation into the fraternity's pledge process.
Case name: Royan v. Chicago State University, et al., No. 20 CV 2014 (N.D. Ill. 04/05/24).
It's been just over a year since the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and University of North Carolina, 600 US 181 (2023). That June 29, 2023 decision effectively eliminated the ability for institutions of higher education to consider an individuals’ protected status as a factor in admissions decisions designed to advance diversity. The Supreme Court found that Harvard's and North Carolina's consideration of protected status in admissions couldn’t satisfy strict scrutiny. The programs therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.