首页 > 最新文献

Child Protection and Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pub Date : 2026-01-01
{"title":"","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146449092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“It's a slippery slope:” How foster parents and agency staff navigate their relationship “这是一个滑坡:”寄养父母和机构工作人员如何处理他们的关系
Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100276
Judy Havlicek , Stacey Shipe
{"title":"“It's a slippery slope:” How foster parents and agency staff navigate their relationship","authors":"Judy Havlicek , Stacey Shipe","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100276","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100276","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cumulative and item-level adverse childhood experiences in relation to suicidal ideation and attempts among incarcerated Japanese youth 日本被监禁青少年中与自杀意念和企图有关的累积和项目层面的不良童年经历
Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100275
Masaru Takahashi , Kasumi Imahara , Kayoko Myojo , Michiko Yasuda , Yukiko Miyamoto

Background

Research reports higher suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs) among offender populations than the general population.

Objective

This study investigated the association of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on SI and SAs among Japanese incarcerated youth.

Participants and setting

The study included 436 participants (351 boys, 85 girls) placed in four juvenile correctional institutions in Japan. Mean age was 17.09 years (SD = 1.59) for boys and 16.76 years (SD = 1.65) for girls, age range 12–19 years.

Method

A self-report questionnaire was administered to detained youth between September 2021 and March 2023, including only those who consented to participate.

Results

Lifetime prevalence of SI was 44.7 % for girls and 19.3 % for boys, while SAs were 29.4 % for girls and 8.0 % for boys, showing girls were significantly more likely to report both behaviors. Logistic regression analyses showed that while cumulative ACE scores were associated with both SI and SAs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.40, 95 %CI = [1.21–1.62] for SA; AOR = 1.32, 95 %CI = [1.17–1.49] for SI), most individual ACEs were not. Only family SAs significantly increased risk of both behaviors, while having an incarcerated family member decreased SI risk.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the need for trauma-informed approaches within forensic and correctional environments to enhance mental health support for affected youth offenders. The results indicate that childhood adversity is not uniformly associated with mental health issues, underscoring the importance of examining how individual ACEs relate to youth suicide prevention efforts.
研究报告表明,罪犯群体中的自杀意念(SI)和自杀企图(SAs)高于一般人群。目的探讨不良童年经历(ace)对日本青少年社会行为和社会行为的影响。参与者和环境这项研究包括436名参与者(351名男孩,85名女孩),他们被安置在日本的四所青少年教养机构。男孩平均年龄17.09岁(SD = 1.59),女孩平均年龄16.76岁(SD = 1.65),年龄范围12-19岁。方法在2021年9月至2023年3月期间,对被拘留的青少年进行自我报告问卷调查,仅包括同意参与的青少年。结果女孩和男孩的终生SI患病率分别为44.7%和19.3%,而女孩和男孩的终生SI患病率分别为29.4%和8.0%,这表明女孩更有可能报告这两种行为。Logistic回归分析显示,虽然累积ACE评分与SI和SA均相关(SA的调整优势比[AOR] = 1.40, 95% CI = [1.21-1.62]; SI的调整优势比[AOR] = 1.32, 95% CI =[1.17-1.49]),但大多数个体ACE并非如此。只有家庭暴力会显著增加这两种行为的风险,而家庭成员被监禁则会降低这种风险。结论我们的研究结果强调了在法医和惩教环境中采用创伤知情方法来加强对受影响的青少年罪犯的心理健康支持的必要性。研究结果表明,童年逆境与心理健康问题并不总是相关的,这就强调了研究个体ace与青少年自杀预防工作之间的关系的重要性。
{"title":"Cumulative and item-level adverse childhood experiences in relation to suicidal ideation and attempts among incarcerated Japanese youth","authors":"Masaru Takahashi ,&nbsp;Kasumi Imahara ,&nbsp;Kayoko Myojo ,&nbsp;Michiko Yasuda ,&nbsp;Yukiko Miyamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100275","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100275","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research reports higher suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs) among offender populations than the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigated the association of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on SI and SAs among Japanese incarcerated youth.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>The study included 436 participants (351 boys, 85 girls) placed in four juvenile correctional institutions in Japan. Mean age was 17.09 years (<em>SD</em> = 1.59) for boys and 16.76 years (<em>SD</em> = 1.65) for girls, age range 12–19 years.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A self-report questionnaire was administered to detained youth between September 2021 and March 2023, including only those who consented to participate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lifetime prevalence of SI was 44.7 % for girls and 19.3 % for boys, while SAs were 29.4 % for girls and 8.0 % for boys, showing girls were significantly more likely to report both behaviors. Logistic regression analyses showed that while cumulative ACE scores were associated with both SI and SAs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.40, 95 %CI = [1.21–1.62] for SA; AOR = 1.32, 95 %CI = [1.17–1.49] for SI), most individual ACEs were not. Only family SAs significantly increased risk of both behaviors, while having an incarcerated family member decreased SI risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need for trauma-informed approaches within forensic and correctional environments to enhance mental health support for affected youth offenders. The results indicate that childhood adversity is not uniformly associated with mental health issues, underscoring the importance of examining how individual ACEs relate to youth suicide prevention efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145839977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surveying children and young people on sensitive topics: Creating engaging, accessible, trauma-informed digital questionnaires 调查儿童和年轻人的敏感话题:创建有吸引力的,可访问的,创伤信息的数字问卷
Pub Date : 2025-12-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100274
Anna McCarthy , Julia I. Rudolph , Deborah Fry , Claire P. Monks , Rosana Pacella , Franziska Meinck

Background

Research with children and young people requires bespoke measurement tools and methodologies, designed with the end-user in mind.

Objective

This paper describes the design of digital questionnaires for children and young people which are engaging, accessible, and trauma-informed. It is presented in the context of a larger study, which designed violence prevalence survey questionnaires for participants aged 11–25 years in the United Kingdom.

Participants and setting

Data collection was conducted with child abuse and violence research professionals, adults and children with lived experience of violence in the UK, and children and young people in the target age group in the UK.

Methods

Feedback on the design of the questionnaires was gathered via online Delphi surveys, focus groups, participatory research sessions, qualitative interviews, and individual consultations. Thematic analysis was conducted to review feedback on digital format features, trauma-informed design, and accessibility. The project followed an iterative and multi-stage process.

Findings

Digital formatting (including matrix questions, survey branching, and navigation buttons), trauma-informed design (including question introductions and opt-out response phrasing), and accessibility features (including audio recordings and readability) can be utilised to generate an engaging, accessible, and trauma-informed measurement tool appropriate for children and young people.

Conclusions

Using an inclusive and child-focused approach to design has the potential to positively impact children's ability and willingness to engage with surveys, ultimately improving the resulting data and our understanding of children's experiences of violence.
针对儿童和年轻人的研究需要为最终用户设计定制的测量工具和方法。目的:本文描述了面向儿童和青少年的数字问卷的设计,该问卷具有参与性、可访问性和创伤信息。它是在一个更大的研究背景下提出的,该研究为英国11-25岁的参与者设计了暴力流行调查问卷。参与者和环境数据收集与儿童虐待和暴力研究专业人员,英国有暴力生活经历的成人和儿童,以及英国目标年龄组的儿童和年轻人一起进行。方法通过在线德尔菲调查、焦点小组、参与式研究会议、定性访谈和个别咨询收集问卷设计反馈。进行了专题分析,以审查对数字格式特征、创伤通知设计和可访问性的反馈。该项目遵循了一个迭代和多阶段的过程。数字格式(包括矩阵问题、调查分支和导航按钮)、创伤知情设计(包括问题介绍和选择退出的回答措辞)和可访问性特征(包括录音和可读性)可用于生成适合儿童和年轻人的引人入胜、可访问和创伤知情的测量工具。采用包容和以儿童为中心的设计方法有可能对儿童参与调查的能力和意愿产生积极影响,最终改善所得数据和我们对儿童暴力经历的理解。
{"title":"Surveying children and young people on sensitive topics: Creating engaging, accessible, trauma-informed digital questionnaires","authors":"Anna McCarthy ,&nbsp;Julia I. Rudolph ,&nbsp;Deborah Fry ,&nbsp;Claire P. Monks ,&nbsp;Rosana Pacella ,&nbsp;Franziska Meinck","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100274","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100274","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research with children and young people requires bespoke measurement tools and methodologies, designed with the end-user in mind.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This paper describes the design of digital questionnaires for children and young people which are engaging, accessible, and trauma-informed. It is presented in the context of a larger study, which designed violence prevalence survey questionnaires for participants aged 11–25 years in the United Kingdom.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Data collection was conducted with child abuse and violence research professionals, adults and children with lived experience of violence in the UK, and children and young people in the target age group in the UK.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Feedback on the design of the questionnaires was gathered via online Delphi surveys, focus groups, participatory research sessions, qualitative interviews, and individual consultations. Thematic analysis was conducted to review feedback on digital format features, trauma-informed design, and accessibility. The project followed an iterative and multi-stage process.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Digital formatting (including matrix questions, survey branching, and navigation buttons), trauma-informed design (including question introductions and opt-out response phrasing), and accessibility features (including audio recordings and readability) can be utilised to generate an engaging, accessible, and trauma-informed measurement tool appropriate for children and young people.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using an inclusive and child-focused approach to design has the potential to positively impact children's ability and willingness to engage with surveys, ultimately improving the resulting data and our understanding of children's experiences of violence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145976821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accounts about siblings’ experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse: Prevalence and agreement in a retrospective study of adult sibling pairs 关于兄弟姐妹遭受身体、性和精神虐待的经历:一项对成年兄弟姐妹的回顾性研究的普遍性和一致性
Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100273
Susanne Witte , Jörg M. Fegert , Sabine Walper

Background

The validity of child abuse reports has been investigated, focusing on the agreement between prospective and retrospective reports of child abuse. The agreement of siblings' accounts about each other's experiences of abuse has been overlooked, although it might provide valuable insights.

Objective

We examined the prevalence of accounts about siblings' experience of abuse in a retrospective survey and analyzed predictors of accounts about different types of abuse. Moreover, agreement between accounts about siblings’ experiences of abuse and predictors of agreement were investigated.

Methods

Retrospective reports of 4568 adults participating in an online survey were analyzed in terms of predictors of accounts about siblings' experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse (71.31 % female). In a subsample of 870 participants, another sibling from the same family also participated in the survey, enabling the assessment of agreement in accounts. Predictors of accounts about siblings' experience of abuse and agreement between accounts were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa as well as agreement in percent.

Findings

Siblings' experience of emotional abuse was reported by 6.33 % of the participants, siblings' experience of physical abuse by 5.76 %, and siblings' experience of sexual abuse by 2.74 %. The agreement was highest for accounts about physical abuse, followed by sexual abuse. The agreement was higher for accounts about older siblings' experience than for younger siblings' experience of all abuse types. Significant predictors of accounts about siblings’ experiences of abuse and agreement between accounts relate to informant characteristics, sibling constellation, sibling relationship quality, and self-reported experience of abuse and neglect.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the possibility of investigating the prevalence rates of child abuse with reports of siblings, but also show possible factors contributing to bias in reporting and thus estimates. In practice, testimony from other family members is an essential aspect of restorative justice proceedings, and these findings might help understand conflicting testimonies.
背景虐待儿童报告的有效性已被调查,重点是儿童虐待的前瞻性和回顾性报告之间的一致性。兄弟姐妹们对彼此受虐经历的一致描述一直被忽视,尽管它可能提供有价值的见解。目的通过回顾性调查,了解兄弟姐妹受虐待经历的流行程度,并分析不同类型受虐待经历的预测因素。此外,关于兄弟姐妹虐待经历的描述之间的一致性和一致性的预测因素进行了调查。方法对参与在线调查的4568名成年人的回顾性报告进行分析,分析其兄弟姐妹遭受身体、性和精神虐待经历的预测因素(71.31%为女性)。在870名参与者的子样本中,来自同一家庭的另一位兄弟姐妹也参与了调查,从而能够评估账户的一致性。使用多变量逻辑回归评估关于兄弟姐妹虐待经历的预测因子和描述之间的一致性。协议是用科恩Kappa和百分比协议来评估的。研究发现,有6.33%的参与者报告了自己的兄弟姐妹遭受过精神虐待,5.76%的参与者报告了自己的兄弟姐妹遭受过身体虐待,2.74%的参与者报告了自己的兄弟姐妹遭受过性虐待。人们对身体虐待的认同程度最高,其次是性虐待。在所有类型的虐待中,对哥哥姐姐经历的描述比对弟弟妹妹经历的描述的一致性更高。关于兄弟姐妹虐待经历的描述和描述之间的一致性的重要预测因素与举报人特征、兄弟姐妹星座、兄弟姐妹关系质量和自我报告的虐待和忽视经历有关。结论研究结果强调了通过兄弟姐妹报告调查儿童虐待发生率的可能性,但也显示了可能导致报告和估计偏差的因素。实际上,其他家庭成员的证词是恢复性司法程序的一个重要方面,这些调查结果可能有助于理解相互矛盾的证词。
{"title":"Accounts about siblings’ experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse: Prevalence and agreement in a retrospective study of adult sibling pairs","authors":"Susanne Witte ,&nbsp;Jörg M. Fegert ,&nbsp;Sabine Walper","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100273","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100273","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The validity of child abuse reports has been investigated, focusing on the agreement between prospective and retrospective reports of child abuse. The agreement of siblings' accounts about each other's experiences of abuse has been overlooked, although it might provide valuable insights.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examined the prevalence of accounts about siblings' experience of abuse in a retrospective survey and analyzed predictors of accounts about different types of abuse. Moreover, agreement between accounts about siblings’ experiences of abuse and predictors of agreement were investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective reports of 4568 adults participating in an online survey were analyzed in terms of predictors of accounts about siblings' experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse (71.31 % female). In a subsample of 870 participants, another sibling from the same family also participated in the survey, enabling the assessment of agreement in accounts. Predictors of accounts about siblings' experience of abuse and agreement between accounts were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa as well as agreement in percent.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Siblings' experience of emotional abuse was reported by 6.33 % of the participants, siblings' experience of physical abuse by 5.76 %, and siblings' experience of sexual abuse by 2.74 %. The agreement was highest for accounts about physical abuse, followed by sexual abuse. The agreement was higher for accounts about older siblings' experience than for younger siblings' experience of all abuse types. Significant predictors of accounts about siblings’ experiences of abuse and agreement between accounts relate to informant characteristics, sibling constellation, sibling relationship quality, and self-reported experience of abuse and neglect.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings highlight the possibility of investigating the prevalence rates of child abuse with reports of siblings, but also show possible factors contributing to bias in reporting and thus estimates. In practice, testimony from other family members is an essential aspect of restorative justice proceedings, and these findings might help understand conflicting testimonies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Child Protection and Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1