首页 > 最新文献

Child Protection and Practice最新文献

英文 中文
The relationship between kinship and foster placement on mental health indicators in children and youth seeking treatment 亲属关系和寄养安置对寻求治疗的儿童和青少年心理健康指标的影响
Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100061
Shannon L. Stewart , Boden Brock , Jordyn Manis , Aadhiya Vasudeva , Jeffrey W. Poss

Background

Children living in both kinship and foster care placements often face considerable adversity. It is possible that these placements can have differential impacts on children’s socioemotional, psychological, and educational outcomes and well-being.

Objective

This study examined the similarities and differences between children and youth who reside in kinship placements and those who reside in foster placements. Specifically, similarities and differences in children's mental health care and service requirements, as well as their family's strengths and resources were explored to better understand the needs of children placed in out-of-home care.

Participants

The final sample included assessments from 5356 treatment-seeking children, ages three to 18 years old, from across 66 select mental health agencies in Ontario.

Methods

Children were assessed using the interRAI ChYMH, the ChYMH-S, or the ChYMH-DD. These assessments include a variety of embedded evidence-informed scales and algorithms to examine the mental health needs, preferences and strengths of these vulnerable children.

Results

Compared to children in kinship placements, children in foster care were more likely to: (a) exhibit greater externalizing symptoms, (b) display concerns regarding sexual behaviour, (c) encounter trauma, and (d) experience more polyvictimization. No differences were found in terms of spirituality and cultural connectedness. Additionally, kinship caregivers tended to experience greater distress, compared to foster caregivers.

Conclusions

Findings from this study highlight important areas where children residing in out-of-home care, particularly those in foster care, require increased access to mental health resources and support. Furthermore, trauma-informed care should always be at the forefront when working with foster and kinship care children and their families.
背景在亲属寄养和寄养家庭中生活的儿童往往面临相当大的逆境。本研究探讨了居住在亲属寄养家庭和寄养家庭的儿童和青少年之间的异同。具体来说,研究人员探讨了儿童心理健康护理和服务要求方面的异同,以及他们家庭的优势和资源,以便更好地了解被安置在家庭外护理机构的儿童的需求。研究人员的最终样本包括来自安大略省 66 家精选心理健康机构的 5356 名寻求治疗的儿童的评估结果,这些儿童的年龄从 3 岁到 18 岁不等。这些评估包括各种嵌入式循证量表和算法,用于检查这些弱势儿童的心理健康需求、偏好和优势:(a) 表现出更多的外化症状,(b) 对性行为表现出担忧,(c) 遭遇心理创伤,以及 (d) 遭受更多的多重伤害。在精神和文化联系方面没有发现差异。此外,与寄养照料者相比,亲属照料者往往会经历更多的痛苦。结论这项研究的结果突出了家庭外儿童,尤其是寄养儿童需要获得更多心理健康资源和支持的重要领域。此外,在与寄养和亲属照料儿童及其家庭合作时,应始终将创伤知情护理放在首位。
{"title":"The relationship between kinship and foster placement on mental health indicators in children and youth seeking treatment","authors":"Shannon L. Stewart ,&nbsp;Boden Brock ,&nbsp;Jordyn Manis ,&nbsp;Aadhiya Vasudeva ,&nbsp;Jeffrey W. Poss","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100061","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100061","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Children living in both kinship and foster care placements often face considerable adversity. It is possible that these placements can have differential impacts on children’s socioemotional, psychological, and educational outcomes and well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined the similarities and differences between children and youth who reside in kinship placements and those who reside in foster placements. Specifically, similarities and differences in children's mental health care and service requirements, as well as their family's strengths and resources were explored to better understand the needs of children placed in out-of-home care.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The final sample included assessments from 5356 treatment-seeking children, ages three to 18 years old, from across 66 select mental health agencies in Ontario.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Children were assessed using the interRAI ChYMH, the ChYMH-S, or the ChYMH-DD. These assessments include a variety of embedded evidence-informed scales and algorithms to examine the mental health needs, preferences and strengths of these vulnerable children.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to children in kinship placements, children in foster care were more likely to: (a) exhibit greater externalizing symptoms, (b) display concerns regarding sexual behaviour, (c) encounter trauma, and (d) experience more polyvictimization. No differences were found in terms of spirituality and cultural connectedness. Additionally, kinship caregivers tended to experience greater distress, compared to foster caregivers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings from this study highlight important areas where children residing in out-of-home care, particularly those in foster care, require increased access to mental health resources and support. Furthermore, trauma-informed care should always be at the forefront when working with foster and kinship care children and their families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000615/pdfft?md5=1bde803c113f5b3b543ca7b01fbea242&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000615-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142311297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“But I wanted to talk about it”: Technology-assisted child sexual abuse victims’ reasoning for delayed disclosure "但我想说出来":技术辅助下儿童性虐待受害者延迟披露的理由
Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100062
Malin Joleby , Sara Landström , Carolina Lunde , Linda S. Jonsson

Background

Victim disclosure is crucial in uncovering and preventing child sexual abuse, but many victims are reluctant to disclose. While research on child sexual abuse has identified a range of barriers and facilitators for disclosure, the disclosure process for technology-assisted child sexual abuse (TA-CSA) is largely unexplored.

Objective

Gain a first-person perspective on TA-CSA disclosure.

Participants and setting

Seven young women (aged 7–13 at onset of abuse, 17–24 at interview) were interviewed about the barriers to disclosure they had faced and potential facilitating factors that would have helped them disclose earlier.

Methods

The interviews were analyzed using data-driven reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

A wish to tell captures the desire to have had someone to share abusive experiences with. Fearing who would find out encapsulates the fear that disclosing to one person will spread beyond the initial disclosure. A need for a cue reflects the participants' lack of knowledge and the need for invitations to talk about sex and abuse. Fearing it was my fault conveys the participants' sense of guilt and their wish to understand that they were not to blame.

Conclusions

Despite a wish to disclose, shame, guilt, and fear were barriers that held them back. Knowledge about TA-CSA, and invitations to the topic were seen as potential facilitators. Four suggested facilitating factors for disclosure, which society and the adult world should prioritize, were synthesized from the interviews: open dialogue on sensitive topics, providing an opportunity to tell, allowing the child to be in control of the story, and lifting the shame and self-blame.

背景受害者披露信息对于揭露和预防儿童性虐待至关重要,但许多受害者不愿披露信息。尽管有关儿童性虐待的研究已经确定了一系列披露的障碍和促进因素,但技术辅助儿童性虐待(TA-CSA)的披露过程在很大程度上还未被探索。参与者和环境对七名年轻女性(受虐时年龄为 7-13 岁,受访时年龄为 17-24 岁)进行了访谈,了解她们在披露信息时所面临的障碍,以及有助于她们更早披露信息的潜在促进因素。害怕谁会发现 "体现了害怕向一个人披露会超出最初披露的范围。需要线索反映了参与者缺乏知识,需要别人邀请他们谈论性和虐待。害怕这是我的错 "表达了参与者的负罪感,以及他们希望了解自己并无过错。对 TA-CSA 的了解和对该主题的邀请被视为潜在的促进因素。从访谈中归纳出了社会和成人世界应优先考虑的四个促进披露的因素:就敏感话题进行公开对话、提供讲述的机会、让儿童掌控故事、解除羞耻感和自责。
{"title":"“But I wanted to talk about it”: Technology-assisted child sexual abuse victims’ reasoning for delayed disclosure","authors":"Malin Joleby ,&nbsp;Sara Landström ,&nbsp;Carolina Lunde ,&nbsp;Linda S. Jonsson","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100062","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100062","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Victim disclosure is crucial in uncovering and preventing child sexual abuse, but many victims are reluctant to disclose. While research on child sexual abuse has identified a range of barriers and facilitators for disclosure, the disclosure process for technology-assisted child sexual abuse (TA-CSA) is largely unexplored.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Gain a first-person perspective on TA-CSA disclosure.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Seven young women (aged 7–13 at onset of abuse, 17–24 at interview) were interviewed about the barriers to disclosure they had faced and potential facilitating factors that would have helped them disclose earlier.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The interviews were analyzed using data-driven reflexive thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><em>A wish to tell</em> captures the desire to have had someone to share abusive experiences with. <em>Fearing who would find out</em> encapsulates the fear that disclosing to one person will spread beyond the initial disclosure. <em>A need for a cue</em> reflects the participants' lack of knowledge and the need for invitations to talk about sex and abuse. <em>Fearing it was my fault</em> conveys the participants' sense of guilt and their wish to understand that they were not to blame.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a wish to disclose, shame, guilt, and fear were barriers that held them back. Knowledge about TA-CSA, and invitations to the topic were seen as potential facilitators. Four suggested facilitating factors for disclosure, which society and the adult world should prioritize, were synthesized from the interviews: open dialogue on sensitive topics, providing an opportunity to tell, allowing the child to be in control of the story, and lifting the shame and self-blame.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000627/pdfft?md5=f1559057e4212ba7db1211963fd78502&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000627-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142240797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing the science of adverse childhood experiences and resilience: A case for global and ecological perspectives 推进有关童年不良经历和复原力的科学研究:从全球和生态角度看问题
Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100060
Sherry Hamby , Cristobal Guerra , Edgardo Toro , Cristián Pinto-Cortez

Research on adverse childhood experiences and resilience (the process of overcoming trauma) has been dominated by studies originating in wealthy democracies of the global north. We call for more global and ecological approaches not only for documenting the true global burden of childhood adversity, but also for advancing the science of resilience and understanding pathways to overcoming trauma. We identify several forms of trauma that need better consideration in prevalence estimates, including state, political, and institutional violence, crisis migration, climate change and related natural disasters, and global health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We also need more nuanced analyses of culture and place and to recognize that the global south and global north are not monolithic concepts. We offer illustrative examples of how more global, ecological approaches can enhance our understanding of pathways to overcoming even high dosages of childhood adversity. One of the key insights of ACEs research, the dose-response relationship between trauma burden and outcomes, has been extended to research on resilience. Concepts that capture the total “dose” of positive assets and resources (people's resilience portfolios) are showing how people might overcome even high doses of trauma. This work can become more global by including incorporating strengths and healing processes common in collectivist, versus individualistic, cultures. It can become more ecological by recognizing that physical environments—both natural and human-made built aspects—play key roles in resilience. Recognizing the intersectionality among these elements can take us to the next generation of trauma and resilience science.

关于童年逆境经历和复原力(克服创伤的过程)的研究主要集中在全球北部富裕的民主国家。我们呼吁采用更具全球性和生态性的方法,这不仅是为了记录全球儿童逆境的真实负担,也是为了推动复原力科学的发展,了解克服创伤的途径。我们发现有几种形式的创伤需要在流行率估算中得到更好的考虑,包括国家、政治和机构暴力,危机移民,气候变化和相关自然灾害,以及全球健康危机(如 COVID-19 大流行病)。我们还需要对文化和地域进行更细致的分析,并认识到全球南部和全球北部并不是单一的概念。我们将举例说明如何通过更具全球性的生态方法来加深我们对克服甚至是高剂量的儿童逆境的途径的理解。童年逆境(ACEs)研究的主要观点之一,即创伤负担与结果之间的剂量-反应关系,已延伸到复原力研究中。捕捉积极资产和资源的总 "剂量"(人们的复原力组合)的概念正在显示人们如何克服即使是高剂量的创伤。通过纳入集体主义文化与个人主义文化中常见的力量和愈合过程,这项工作可以变得更加全球化。通过认识到物理环境--包括自然环境和人造建筑环境--在复原力方面发挥着关键作用,这项工作可以变得更加生态化。认识到这些因素之间的交叉性,可以将我们带入下一代创伤和复原力科学。
{"title":"Advancing the science of adverse childhood experiences and resilience: A case for global and ecological perspectives","authors":"Sherry Hamby ,&nbsp;Cristobal Guerra ,&nbsp;Edgardo Toro ,&nbsp;Cristián Pinto-Cortez","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100060","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100060","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on adverse childhood experiences and resilience (the process of overcoming trauma) has been dominated by studies originating in wealthy democracies of the global north. We call for more global and ecological approaches not only for documenting the true global burden of childhood adversity, but also for advancing the science of resilience and understanding pathways to overcoming trauma. We identify several forms of trauma that need better consideration in prevalence estimates, including state, political, and institutional violence, crisis migration, climate change and related natural disasters, and global health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We also need more nuanced analyses of culture and place and to recognize that the global south and global north are not monolithic concepts. We offer illustrative examples of how more global, ecological approaches can enhance our understanding of pathways to overcoming even high dosages of childhood adversity. One of the key insights of ACEs research, the dose-response relationship between trauma burden and outcomes, has been extended to research on resilience. Concepts that capture the total “dose” of positive assets and resources (people's <em>resilience portfolios</em>) are showing how people might overcome even high doses of trauma. This work can become more global by including incorporating strengths and healing processes common in collectivist, versus individualistic, cultures. It can become more ecological by recognizing that physical environments—both natural and human-made built aspects—play key roles in resilience. Recognizing the intersectionality among these elements can take us to the next generation of trauma and resilience science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000603/pdfft?md5=c9db77d57f5e5423dbf894ccaecb43ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000603-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142240798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thinking politically about social work in child protection and welfare: A radical Reappropriation of the works of Hannah Arendt 从政治角度思考儿童保护和福利方面的社会工作:从根本上再现汉娜-阿伦特的作品
Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100059
Susan Flynn

This article presents a theoretical exposition of Arendtian political philosophy for child protection and welfare social work. The aim is to better understand and inform social work in the field of child protection and welfare, whilst accounting for the political context of practice. Sustaining the exposition is the view that power-laden child protection systems are ultimately socio-political through their authority to intervene in private family life. This is partly owing to the instrumental power inherent in child protection systems to exert dominance and control over service users and social groups leading to raced, gendered and classed outcomes in child welfare. To unpack the political nature of social work in child protection and welfare, a tripartite conceptual frame of private, public and social domains is derived from Arendt’s philosophical work. This is critically applied to put forward seven propositions for how social work can develop in child protection and welfare, with respect to practice in a socio-political context. Practical implications for future social work include implementing evidence-informed advocacy efforts and conducting empirical research toward preserving balance in social work attention to public and private life.

本文从理论上阐述了儿童保护与福利社会工作中的阿伦特政治哲学。其目的是更好地理解和指导儿童保护与福利领域的社会工作,同时考虑到实践的政治背景。这一论述的支撑点是,充满权力色彩的儿童保护体系通过其干预私人家庭生活的权力,最终成为社会政治体系。这部分是由于儿童保护体系中固有的工具性权力对服务使用者和社会群体施加支配和控制,从而导致儿童福利中的种族、性别和阶级结果。为了揭示儿童保护和福利领域社会工作的政治本质,我们从阿伦特的哲学著作中引申出一个关于私人、公共和社会领域的三方概念框架。通过批判性地应用这一框架,提出了社会工作在社会政治背景下如何在儿童保护和福利领域发展的七项主张。对未来社会工作的实际影响包括:实施以证据为依据的宣传工作,开展实证研究,以保持社会工作对公共生活和私人生活的关注之间的平衡。
{"title":"Thinking politically about social work in child protection and welfare: A radical Reappropriation of the works of Hannah Arendt","authors":"Susan Flynn","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100059","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100059","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a theoretical exposition of Arendtian political philosophy for child protection and welfare social work. The aim is to better understand and inform social work in the field of child protection and welfare, whilst accounting for the political context of practice. Sustaining the exposition is the view that power-laden child protection systems are ultimately socio-political through their authority to intervene in private family life. This is partly owing to the instrumental power inherent in child protection systems to exert dominance and control over service users and social groups leading to raced, gendered and classed outcomes in child welfare. To unpack the political nature of social work in child protection and welfare, a tripartite conceptual frame of private, public and social domains is derived from Arendt’s philosophical work. This is critically applied to put forward seven propositions for how social work can develop in child protection and welfare, with respect to practice in a socio-political context. Practical implications for future social work include implementing evidence-informed advocacy efforts and conducting empirical research toward preserving balance in social work attention to public and private life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000597/pdfft?md5=5a6d0c5bfa80f311c2a0c924f29a089d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000597-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142148832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Justice for institutional child abuse: Comparing views from survivor and non-survivor led advocacy groups 为机构虐待儿童行为伸张正义:比较幸存者和非幸存者领导的倡导团体的观点
Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100058
Alasdair Henry , Katie Wright , Anthony Moran

Background

How victims and survivors of non-recent institutional child abuse – and the advocacy groups that support them – conceptualise justice has become a central concern for policy makers designing redress schemes.

Objectives

This study aimed to explore articulations of justice by two types of advocacy organisations in Australia – survivor and non-survivor led groups – by examining transcripts from public hearings of the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

Participants and setting

Hearings held in 2015 for Case Study 25: Redress and Civil Litigation were analysed. The analysis focused on five survivor led groups and 13 non-survivor led groups.

Methods

Using a framework adapted from Daly (2014, 2017), qualitative content and thematic analysis was used to analyse transcript data to identify "justice interests" and “survival needs”.

Results

For survivor led groups, validation was the most frequently coded justice interest, while for the non-survivor led groups, the category of survival needs was the most frequently recorded element.

Conclusions

Advocacy groups contribute highly valuable insights and perspectives to redress consultation and design processes. A key justice interest emphasised by survivor led groups was the need for public acknowledgement of how offending institutions wield power, both in the abuse of children and in the subsequent strategies employed to ensure survival of the institution and avoid justice processes. For non-survivor led groups, communicating their professional expertise about what victims and survivors need from a redress scheme was paramount.
背景非近期机构虐待儿童事件的受害者和幸存者--以及支持他们的维权组织--如何构想正义,已成为政策制定者在设计补救计划时关注的核心问题。研究目的本研究旨在通过审查澳大利亚皇家儿童性虐待机构应对委员会(Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse)公开听证会的记录,探讨澳大利亚两类维权组织--幸存者和非幸存者领导的团体--对正义的表述:对 2015 年举行的 "案例研究 25:补救和民事诉讼 "听证会进行了分析。方法利用改编自 Daly(2014 年,2017 年)的框架,采用定性内容和主题分析方法对记录数据进行分析,以确定 "正义利益 "和 "生存需求"。结果对于幸存者领导的小组,验证是最常被编码的正义利益,而对于非幸存者领导的小组,生存需求类别是最常被记录的要素。幸存者领导的团体所强调的一个主要司法利益是,需要让公众认识到犯罪机构是如何行使权力的,无论是在虐待儿童的过程中,还是在随后为确保机构生存和规避司法程序而采取的策略中,都是如此。对于非幸存者领导的团体来说,最重要的是传达他们的专业知识,即受害者和幸存者需要从补救计划中获得什么。
{"title":"Justice for institutional child abuse: Comparing views from survivor and non-survivor led advocacy groups","authors":"Alasdair Henry ,&nbsp;Katie Wright ,&nbsp;Anthony Moran","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100058","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100058","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>How victims and survivors of non-recent institutional child abuse – and the advocacy groups that support them – conceptualise justice has become a central concern for policy makers designing redress schemes.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to explore articulations of justice by two types of advocacy organisations in Australia – survivor and non-survivor led groups – by examining transcripts from public hearings of the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Hearings held in 2015 for Case Study 25: Redress and Civil Litigation were analysed. The analysis focused on five survivor led groups and 13 non-survivor led groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a framework adapted from Daly (2014, 2017), qualitative content and thematic analysis was used to analyse transcript data to identify \"justice interests\" and “survival needs”.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For survivor led groups, validation was the most frequently coded justice interest, while for the non-survivor led groups, the category of survival needs was the most frequently recorded element.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advocacy groups contribute highly valuable insights and perspectives to redress consultation and design processes. A key justice interest emphasised by survivor led groups was the need for public acknowledgement of how offending institutions wield power, both in the abuse of children and in the subsequent strategies employed to ensure survival of the institution and avoid justice processes. For non-survivor led groups, communicating their professional expertise about what victims and survivors need from a redress scheme was paramount.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142653632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in parent and youth reported parenting strategies and the relationship with youth reported resilience: Who you ask matters 家长和青少年报告的养育策略差异以及与青少年报告的复原力之间的关系:问谁很重要
Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100055
Tracie O. Afifi , Janique Fortier , Ashley Stewart-Tufescu , Ana Osorio , Tamara Taillieu , Hanita Kosher , Carmit Katz , Asher Ben-Arieh

Background

It is common in parenting research for parents to report on the parenting strategies they utilize rather than soliciting children and youths’ experiences of being parented. Who we include in research may change our understanding of parent-child relationships and related outcomes for children and youth.

Objective

To: a) examine similarities and differences among 21 parent- and youth-reported parenting strategies and b) examine the differences in trends for each parenting strategy and youth-reported resilience depending on who reported the parenting strategies.

Participants and setting

Data were from the Well-being and Experiences (WE) Study (n = 1000 youth/parent dyads), a community sample of youth aged 14–17 years and parents from Canada collected from 2017 to 2018.

Methods

Descriptive statistics, McNemar's test, and linear regression models were used to analyze the data.

Findings

The prevalence of five parenting strategies were statistically similar when reported by youth and parents, while three parenting strategies were statistically higher among youth reports compared to parent reports, and 13 parenting strategies were statistically higher among parent reports compared to youth reports. Only one parent-reported parenting strategy was associated with decreased youth-reported resilience. No parent-reported strategies were associated with increased youth-reported resilience. For youth-reports, five parenting strategies were significantly related to increased youth resilience and three parenting strategies were significantly related to decreased youth resilience. Findings indicate that children's and youths' voices should be prioritized in future parenting research, which may inform parenting supports and interventions to prevent child maltreatment and to promote resilience for children and youth.

背景在亲职教育研究中,父母通常会报告他们所使用的亲职教育策略,而不是征询儿童和青少年的亲职教育经验。我们在研究中纳入的对象可能会改变我们对亲子关系以及儿童和青少年相关结果的理解。目标a)研究21种父母和青少年报告的养育策略的相似性和差异性;b)研究每种养育策略和青少年报告的复原力趋势的差异,这取决于谁报告了养育策略。方法采用描述性统计、麦克尼玛检验和线性回归模型对数据进行分析。结果青少年和家长报告的五种养育策略的流行率在统计学上相似,而青少年报告的三种养育策略在统计学上高于家长报告的三种养育策略,家长报告的13种养育策略在统计学上高于青少年报告的13种养育策略。只有一项家长报告的教养策略与青少年报告的复原力下降有关。没有一项家长报告的策略与青少年报告的抗逆力提高有关。在青少年的报告中,有五项养育策略与青少年抗逆力的提高有显著关系,有三项养育策略与青少年抗逆力的降低有显著关系。研究结果表明,在未来的养育研究中,应优先考虑儿童和青少年的声音,从而为养育支持和干预措施提供依据,以预防虐待儿童行为并提高儿童和青少年的抗逆力。
{"title":"Differences in parent and youth reported parenting strategies and the relationship with youth reported resilience: Who you ask matters","authors":"Tracie O. Afifi ,&nbsp;Janique Fortier ,&nbsp;Ashley Stewart-Tufescu ,&nbsp;Ana Osorio ,&nbsp;Tamara Taillieu ,&nbsp;Hanita Kosher ,&nbsp;Carmit Katz ,&nbsp;Asher Ben-Arieh","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100055","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100055","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is common in parenting research for parents to report on the parenting strategies they utilize rather than soliciting children and youths’ experiences of being parented. Who we include in research may change our understanding of parent-child relationships and related outcomes for children and youth.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To: a) examine similarities and differences among 21 parent- and youth-reported parenting strategies and b) examine the differences in trends for each parenting strategy and youth-reported resilience depending on who reported the parenting strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Data were from the Well-being and Experiences (WE) Study (n = 1000 youth/parent dyads), a community sample of youth aged 14–17 years and parents from Canada collected from 2017 to 2018.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive statistics, McNemar's test, and linear regression models were used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The prevalence of five parenting strategies were statistically similar when reported by youth and parents, while three parenting strategies were statistically higher among youth reports compared to parent reports, and 13 parenting strategies were statistically higher among parent reports compared to youth reports. Only one parent-reported parenting strategy was associated with decreased youth-reported resilience. No parent-reported strategies were associated with increased youth-reported resilience. For youth-reports, five parenting strategies were significantly related to increased youth resilience and three parenting strategies were significantly related to decreased youth resilience. Findings indicate that children's and youths' voices should be prioritized in future parenting research, which may inform parenting supports and interventions to prevent child maltreatment and to promote resilience for children and youth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019382400055X/pdfft?md5=bc9f984a21db63ea8d7949c350358f1a&pid=1-s2.0-S295019382400055X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142117588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global and inclusive considerations for the future of ACEs research 对未来 ACE 研究的全球性和包容性考虑
Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100054
Kafui Sawyer , Samantha Kempe , Matthew Carwana , Nicole Racine

Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) can increase the risk of physical, mental, behavioral, and educational difficulties across the lifespan. ACEs research to date has largely had an individualistic approach, considering experience impacting one person within their own family. In order to be more relevant across societies and cultures around the globe, there is a need to build on current ACEs research by also considering broader aspects of the social ecology including individual, societal, and cultural factors. This commentary discusses the limitations of the current ACEs research and the need to also consider social and methodological aspects of adversity. The importance of considering protective factors is also discussed.

童年不良经历(ACEs)会增加人一生中出现身体、心理、行为和教育问题的风险。迄今为止,ACEs 研究主要采用的是个体化方法,考虑的是一个人在其家庭中受到的影响。为了更贴近全球不同社会和文化,有必要在当前 ACEs 研究的基础上,考虑社会生态学更广泛的方面,包括个人、社会和文化因素。本评论讨论了当前 ACEs 研究的局限性,以及考虑逆境的社会和方法方面的必要性。还讨论了考虑保护性因素的重要性。
{"title":"Global and inclusive considerations for the future of ACEs research","authors":"Kafui Sawyer ,&nbsp;Samantha Kempe ,&nbsp;Matthew Carwana ,&nbsp;Nicole Racine","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100054","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100054","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) can increase the risk of physical, mental, behavioral, and educational difficulties across the lifespan. ACEs research to date has largely had an individualistic approach, considering experience impacting one person within their own family. In order to be more relevant across societies and cultures around the globe, there is a need to build on current ACEs research by also considering broader aspects of the social ecology including individual, societal, and cultural factors. This commentary discusses the limitations of the current ACEs research and the need to also consider social and methodological aspects of adversity. The importance of considering protective factors is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100054"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000548/pdfft?md5=729813feeac4fc5b228e6e470e3d63f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000548-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141993172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the intergenerational continuity of ACEs amongst a sample of Welsh male prisoners: A retrospective cross-sectional study 在威尔士男性囚犯样本中探索 ACE 的代际连续性:回顾性横断面研究
Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100053
Kat Ford , Mark A. Bellis , Karen Hughes , Natasha Judd , Emma R. Barton

Background

The relationship between parent and child adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure remains underexplored, particularly within justice-involved samples.

Objective

This objective of the study was to examine the intergenerational continuity of ACEs within a UK prison population.

Participants

294 males aged 18–69 years in a Welsh prison, with father reported data for 671 children they had fathered.

Methods

A face-to-face ACE questionnaire measured exposure to 10 ACE types. For each child they had fathered participants were asked to report their child's gender, age and their exposure before the age of 18 to the same ACE types, except having a household member incarcerated.

Findings

Paternal ACE exposure was found to increase the risk of child ACE exposure, both to multiple ACEs and individual ACE types. Compared to children of fathers with no ACEs, those of fathers with 4+ were almost three times more likely to have been exposed to 2–3 ACEs and six times more likely to be exposed to 4+ ACEs. The risk of a child residing in a household where mental illness was present was 7.4 times higher where their father had 4+ ACEs.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the need for prevention interventions to break the intergenerational continuity of ACEs. Further research is needed to explore what protects against the intergenerational continuity of ACEs. Criminal justice systems and wider services need to ensure that they support those incarcerated alongside their families who are at high risk of ACEs and consequently poorer education, health and criminal justice outcomes.

背景父母与子女的不良童年经历(ACE)暴露之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨,尤其是在涉及司法的样本中。方法面对面的 ACE 问卷调查测量了 10 种 ACE 类型的暴露情况。研究结果发现,父亲的 ACE 暴露会增加子女的 ACE 暴露风险,无论是多重 ACE 还是单个 ACE 类型。与父亲没有ACE的儿童相比,父亲有4种以上ACE的儿童受到2-3种ACE影响的几率几乎是后者的三倍,受到4种以上ACE影响的几率是后者的六倍。如果孩子的父亲有 4 次以上的 ACE,那么孩子生活在有精神疾病家庭的风险要高出 7.4 倍。需要开展进一步的研究,探讨如何防止 ACEs 的代际延续。刑事司法系统和更广泛的服务需要确保为那些被监禁的人及其家人提供支持,因为他们极有可能受到 ACEs 的影响,从而导致较差的教育、健康和刑事司法结果。
{"title":"Exploring the intergenerational continuity of ACEs amongst a sample of Welsh male prisoners: A retrospective cross-sectional study","authors":"Kat Ford ,&nbsp;Mark A. Bellis ,&nbsp;Karen Hughes ,&nbsp;Natasha Judd ,&nbsp;Emma R. Barton","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100053","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100053","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between parent and child adverse childhood experience (ACE) exposure remains underexplored, particularly within justice-involved samples.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This objective of the study was to examine the intergenerational continuity of ACEs within a UK prison population.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>294 males aged 18–69 years in a Welsh prison, with father reported data for 671 children they had fathered.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A face-to-face ACE questionnaire measured exposure to 10 ACE types. For each child they had fathered participants were asked to report their child's gender, age and their exposure before the age of 18 to the same ACE types, except having a household member incarcerated.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Paternal ACE exposure was found to increase the risk of child ACE exposure, both to multiple ACEs and individual ACE types. Compared to children of fathers with no ACEs, those of fathers with 4+ were almost three times more likely to have been exposed to 2–3 ACEs and six times more likely to be exposed to 4+ ACEs. The risk of a child residing in a household where mental illness was present was 7.4 times higher where their father had 4+ ACEs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings highlight the need for prevention interventions to break the intergenerational continuity of ACEs. Further research is needed to explore what protects against the intergenerational continuity of ACEs. Criminal justice systems and wider services need to ensure that they support those incarcerated alongside their families who are at high risk of ACEs and consequently poorer education, health and criminal justice outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000536/pdfft?md5=c0e0a49437645c70d6a323dfd3a471fb&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000536-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142011338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse childhood experiences, sentinel injuries, and effective clinical responses: Can we do better? – A Canadian perspective 童年的不良经历、定点伤害和有效的临床应对措施:我们能做得更好吗?- 加拿大的视角
Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100052
Megan Cooney, Suzanne Kathleen Robinson

Medically minor abusive injuries, known as sentinel injuries, are often missed in clinical settings. Child physical abuse, which frequently presents with medically minor or no visible injury, is a common adverse childhood experience (ACE). Practitioners are not typically trained to consider the increased risk of detrimental outcomes described with ACE exposures when young children present with sentinel injuries. However, these injuries may be the only visible signs that a young child is at increased risk of detrimental health, social, and behavioral concerns both imminently and over the lifespan. This Practice Perspective aims to describe common sentinel injuries, discuss why they are underrecognized by practitioners, and describe the clinical approach to assessing these injuries from a Canadian perspective. It will also discuss how improving recognition could decrease subsequent severe presentations with child maltreatment while also identifying children at risk for the detrimental outcomes described in adults with exposures to ACEs.

医学上轻微的虐待伤害被称为 "哨兵伤害",在临床上经常被漏诊。儿童身体虐待通常表现为医学上的轻微损伤或无明显损伤,是一种常见的不良童年经历(ACE)。当幼儿出现前哨性损伤时,从业人员通常不会接受培训,以考虑到 ACE 暴露所带来的有害后果风险的增加。然而,这些伤害可能是唯一可见的迹象,表明幼儿面临的有害健康、社会和行为问题的风险增加,无论是在近期还是在整个生命周期。本 "实践视角 "旨在描述常见的前兆性损伤,讨论从业人员对这些损伤认识不足的原因,并从加拿大的角度描述评估这些损伤的临床方法。它还将讨论如何通过提高识别率来减少随后出现的严重儿童虐待现象,同时识别有可能出现成人所描述的暴露于 ACEs 的有害结果的儿童。
{"title":"Adverse childhood experiences, sentinel injuries, and effective clinical responses: Can we do better? – A Canadian perspective","authors":"Megan Cooney,&nbsp;Suzanne Kathleen Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100052","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100052","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medically minor abusive injuries, known as sentinel injuries, are often missed in clinical settings. Child physical abuse, which frequently presents with medically minor or no visible injury, is a common adverse childhood experience (ACE). Practitioners are not typically trained to consider the increased risk of detrimental outcomes described with ACE exposures when young children present with sentinel injuries. However, these injuries may be the only visible signs that a young child is at increased risk of detrimental health, social, and behavioral concerns both imminently and over the lifespan. This Practice Perspective aims to describe common sentinel injuries, discuss why they are underrecognized by practitioners, and describe the clinical approach to assessing these injuries from a Canadian perspective. It will also discuss how improving recognition could decrease subsequent severe presentations with child maltreatment while also identifying children at risk for the detrimental outcomes described in adults with exposures to ACEs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000524/pdfft?md5=98a8c52f7e9811b276305f6ee8469f8d&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000524-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141985841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Young people's experiences and use of violence in the home: Examining four types of child maltreatment, their intersections and self-reported use of violence in the home 青少年在家中使用暴力的经历和情况:研究四种类型的虐待儿童行为、它们之间的交叉关系以及自我报告的在家中使用暴力的情况
Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100051
Silke Meyer , María Atiénzar-Prieto , Kate Fitz-Gibbon

Background

Child maltreatment has received substantial academic attention. However, little remains known about the intersection of different types of child maltreatment and their association with young people's use of violence in the home.

Objective

To examine the intersection of child maltreatment types and the intergenerational transmission of violence through young people's use of violence in the home.

Participants

and setting: A total of 5021 young people (16–20 years old) completed an online survey, recruited using non-probability sampling via survey panels.

Methods

Analyses were carried out using χ2 tests and a series of binary logistic regressions to examine the association between participant characteristics and unique child maltreatment experiences with different forms of maltreatment and young people's use of violence.

Results

Overall, 29.9% of participants had experienced at least one form of maltreatment and 16.7% reported experiences of multi-type maltreatment. The most common experiences were childhood experiences of domestic violence (CEDV) (27.3%), followed by verbal/emotional abuse (17%), which both increased the likelihood of also experiencing physical abuse (OR = 5.85 and OR = 10.21, respectively). Cisgender females and children living with a disability were more likely to experience all four types of maltreatment. Experiences of verbal/emotional abuse (OR = 4.56), and CEDV (OR = 4.52) increased the risk of young people's use of violence in the home.

Conclusions

Findings contribute to a growing body of work recognising CEDV as a distinct form of child maltreatment which intersects with other experiences of abuse, including young people's use of violence in the home.

背景儿童虐待问题受到了学术界的广泛关注。然而,人们对不同类型的虐待儿童行为之间的交集及其与青少年在家中使用暴力之间的关联仍然知之甚少。目的 研究虐待儿童行为与青少年在家中使用暴力之间的交集以及暴力的代际传播:方法使用χ2检验和一系列二元逻辑回归分析参与者特征和独特的儿童虐待经历与不同形式的虐待和青少年使用暴力之间的关联。结果总体而言,29.9%的参与者至少经历过一种形式的虐待,16.7%的参与者报告了多种类型的虐待经历。最常见的虐待经历是童年遭受家庭暴力(CEDV)(27.3%),其次是言语/情感虐待(17%),这两种虐待都会增加遭受身体虐待的可能性(OR = 5.85 和 OR = 10.21)。顺性别女性和残疾儿童更有可能遭受所有四种类型的虐待。(OR=4.56)和CEDV(OR=4.52)增加了青少年在家中使用暴力的风险。结论越来越多的研究认识到CEDV是一种独特的儿童虐待形式,它与其他虐待经历(包括青少年在家中使用暴力)相互交织。
{"title":"Young people's experiences and use of violence in the home: Examining four types of child maltreatment, their intersections and self-reported use of violence in the home","authors":"Silke Meyer ,&nbsp;María Atiénzar-Prieto ,&nbsp;Kate Fitz-Gibbon","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100051","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100051","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Child maltreatment has received substantial academic attention. However, little remains known about the intersection of different types of child maltreatment and their association with young people's use of violence in the home.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the intersection of child maltreatment types and the intergenerational transmission of violence through young people's use of violence in the home.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p><em>and setting</em>: A total of 5021 young people (16–20 years old) completed an online survey, recruited using non-probability sampling via survey panels.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Analyses were carried out using χ<sup>2</sup> tests and a series of binary logistic regressions to examine the association between participant characteristics and unique child maltreatment experiences with different forms of maltreatment and young people's use of violence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 29.9% of participants had experienced at least one form of maltreatment and 16.7% reported experiences of multi-type maltreatment. The most common experiences were childhood experiences of domestic violence (CEDV) (27.3%), followed by verbal/emotional abuse (17%), which both increased the likelihood of also experiencing physical abuse (OR = 5.85 and OR = 10.21, respectively). Cisgender females and children living with a disability were more likely to experience all four types of maltreatment. Experiences of verbal/emotional abuse (OR = 4.56), and CEDV (OR = 4.52) increased the risk of young people's use of violence in the home.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings contribute to a growing body of work recognising CEDV as a distinct form of child maltreatment which intersects with other experiences of abuse, including young people's use of violence in the home.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000512/pdfft?md5=d17adc3d093181a291b37c406a9def45&pid=1-s2.0-S2950193824000512-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141979563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Child Protection and Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1