Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01995-8
Jessica A Goddard-Polly, Terrance J Wade, Brendan F Andrade, Dillon T Browne, John E Krzeczkowski, Karen A Patte
Mental disorders tend to cluster within families, yet the majority of research focuses on one child per family. There is a paucity of research examining the impact of a child's mental disorder on siblings. This scoping review addresses the following questions: (i) How do mental disorders in children impact the mental health of their sibling(s)? (ii) Which resources exist that address the needs of siblings of children with mental disorders? We searched eight databases for empirical studies and screened for those published since 2011. n = 27 studies were included; n = 21 studies addressed research question one and n = 6 addressed research question two. Pertaining to research question one, quantitative studies found that siblings of children with mental disorders are at risk for developing mental health problems or psychopathology themselves and experience a wide range of symptoms across many diagnostic categories. Qualitative studies reported siblings' negative emotions and experiences (e.g., confusion about child's disorder, fearful of violence from the child). Pertaining to research question two, we found a paucity of research (n = 6 studies) that assessed resources or interventions for siblings, indicating that there is likely a lack of interventions available for siblings. Future research should look to use more robust quantitative study designs (e.g., longitudinal, mixed-methods) in diverse samples and qualitative methodologies that can investigate particularly concerning instances. While we did identify that sibling interventions exist, those created with sibling and family voices may be better positioned to address sibling's needs.
{"title":"Examining the Mental Health of Siblings of Children with a Mental Disorder: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jessica A Goddard-Polly, Terrance J Wade, Brendan F Andrade, Dillon T Browne, John E Krzeczkowski, Karen A Patte","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01995-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01995-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental disorders tend to cluster within families, yet the majority of research focuses on one child per family. There is a paucity of research examining the impact of a child's mental disorder on siblings. This scoping review addresses the following questions: (i) How do mental disorders in children impact the mental health of their sibling(s)? (ii) Which resources exist that address the needs of siblings of children with mental disorders? We searched eight databases for empirical studies and screened for those published since 2011. n = 27 studies were included; n = 21 studies addressed research question one and n = 6 addressed research question two. Pertaining to research question one, quantitative studies found that siblings of children with mental disorders are at risk for developing mental health problems or psychopathology themselves and experience a wide range of symptoms across many diagnostic categories. Qualitative studies reported siblings' negative emotions and experiences (e.g., confusion about child's disorder, fearful of violence from the child). Pertaining to research question two, we found a paucity of research (n = 6 studies) that assessed resources or interventions for siblings, indicating that there is likely a lack of interventions available for siblings. Future research should look to use more robust quantitative study designs (e.g., longitudinal, mixed-methods) in diverse samples and qualitative methodologies that can investigate particularly concerning instances. While we did identify that sibling interventions exist, those created with sibling and family voices may be better positioned to address sibling's needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147442688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-05DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01993-w
Marissa M Falcone, Lyndsey J Chong, George A Buzzell, Michael J Crowley, Youcai Yang, Yasmin Rey, Alison M Magnotti, Eli R Lebowitz, Amit Lazarov, Yair Bar-Haim, Daniel S Pine, Wendy K Silverman, Jeremy W Pettit
Despite theory and research linking parent anxiety to youth attention bias to threat, knowledge gaps remain regarding potential moderators. We examined youth attention focusing (i.e., ability to inhibit distractors and sustain attention) and attention shifting (i.e., ability to flexibility shift attention) as moderators of the association between parent anxiety and youth attention bias to threat among peripubertal youth with social anxiety disorder. We expected that parent anxiety would be associated with youth attention bias to threat at low levels of attention focusing and shifting. Participants were 165 clinically referred peripubertal youth (ages 9-14 years, M = 12.21 years; SD = 1.55; 73.9% White, 57.0% Hispanic or Latino; 63.0% females) with social anxiety disorder. We used a free-viewing task with eye tracking to measure youth attention bias to threat, self-ratings to measure youth attention focusing and shifting, and self-ratings to measure parent anxiety. Attention focusing, but not shifting, moderated the association between parent anxiety and youth attention bias to threat. At low levels of attention focusing, high parent anxiety was associated with high youth attention bias to threat. Findings suggest that parent anxiety serves as a signal that enhances socially anxious youths' attention to threat, particularly among those who struggle to sustain focused attention. We extend our findings to implications for theory and treatment of social anxiety in youth.
{"title":"Attention Focusing Moderates the Association Between Parent Anxiety and Attention Bias to Threat in Youth with Social Anxiety Disorder.","authors":"Marissa M Falcone, Lyndsey J Chong, George A Buzzell, Michael J Crowley, Youcai Yang, Yasmin Rey, Alison M Magnotti, Eli R Lebowitz, Amit Lazarov, Yair Bar-Haim, Daniel S Pine, Wendy K Silverman, Jeremy W Pettit","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01993-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01993-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite theory and research linking parent anxiety to youth attention bias to threat, knowledge gaps remain regarding potential moderators. We examined youth attention focusing (i.e., ability to inhibit distractors and sustain attention) and attention shifting (i.e., ability to flexibility shift attention) as moderators of the association between parent anxiety and youth attention bias to threat among peripubertal youth with social anxiety disorder. We expected that parent anxiety would be associated with youth attention bias to threat at low levels of attention focusing and shifting. Participants were 165 clinically referred peripubertal youth (ages 9-14 years, M = 12.21 years; SD = 1.55; 73.9% White, 57.0% Hispanic or Latino; 63.0% females) with social anxiety disorder. We used a free-viewing task with eye tracking to measure youth attention bias to threat, self-ratings to measure youth attention focusing and shifting, and self-ratings to measure parent anxiety. Attention focusing, but not shifting, moderated the association between parent anxiety and youth attention bias to threat. At low levels of attention focusing, high parent anxiety was associated with high youth attention bias to threat. Findings suggest that parent anxiety serves as a signal that enhances socially anxious youths' attention to threat, particularly among those who struggle to sustain focused attention. We extend our findings to implications for theory and treatment of social anxiety in youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01984-x
Simon Ntumi, Daniel Miezah
Childhood behavioral difficulties are recognized as early indicators of future psychiatric disorders, yet their long-term predictive validity in non-Western settings remains underexplored. This study investigated the predictive value of childhood behavioral assessments in determining adult psychiatric outcomes among 300 individuals in Ghana followed longitudinally from childhood to early adulthood. Using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), both externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression, hyperactivity) and internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety, withdrawal) were assessed between 2005 and 2015, while adult mental health outcomes including mood, anxiety, substance use, and psychotic disorders were measured with standardized diagnostic instruments such as the MINI, PHQ-9, and GAD-7. Logistic regression analyses revealed that both internalizing (B = 0.87, OR = 2.39, p < .001) and externalizing (B = 1.23, OR = 3.42, p < .001) behaviors significantly predicted adult psychiatric outcomes, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Exposure to trauma (OR = 4.67, p < .001) and low parental education (OR = 1.80, p < .01) increased risk, while early intervention (OR = 0.54, p < .01) served as a protective factor. The overall model demonstrated good fit and strong discriminative power (Nagelkerke R² = 0.29; AUC = 0.83). Cross-cultural validity analyses showed that childhood behavioral scores predicted adult psychiatric disorders effectively, with the strongest accuracy for mood disorders (AUC = 0.82) and overall psychiatric risk (AUC = 0.85). Moderate predictive power was found for psychotic (AUC = 0.73) and neurodevelopmental disorders (AUC = 0.75), and weaker for substance use (AUC = 0.68). Moderation analyses indicated that gender, socioeconomic status, family structure, exposure to trauma, parental involvement, and residence significantly influenced these relationships, with trauma being the strongest risk enhancer. The study highlights the predictive utility of culturally adapted behavioral assessments and underscores the need for early screening and family-centered interventions within Ghana's education and health systems to mitigate long-term mental health risks.
儿童行为困难被认为是未来精神疾病的早期指标,但其在非西方环境中的长期预测有效性仍未得到充分探索。本研究调查了300名加纳人从童年到成年早期纵向追踪的儿童行为评估在确定成人精神结局方面的预测价值。使用儿童行为检查表(CBCL),在2005年至2015年间评估了外化行为(如攻击、多动)和内化行为(如焦虑、戒断),同时使用MINI、PHQ-9和GAD-7等标准化诊断工具测量了成人心理健康结果,包括情绪、焦虑、物质使用和精神障碍。Logistic回归分析显示,内化行为(B = 0.87, OR = 2.39, p < .001)和外化行为(B = 1.23, OR = 3.42, p < .001)在控制社会人口学因素后仍能显著预测成人精神病学结局。创伤暴露(OR = 4.67, p < .001)和父母教育程度低(OR = 1.80, p < .01)增加了风险,早期干预(OR = 0.54, p < .01)是保护因素。整体模型拟合良好,判别能力强(Nagelkerke R²= 0.29;AUC = 0.83)。跨文化效度分析显示,儿童行为评分能有效预测成人精神障碍,其中情绪障碍(AUC = 0.82)和整体精神风险(AUC = 0.85)的准确性最高。对精神病(AUC = 0.73)和神经发育障碍(AUC = 0.75)的预测能力中等,对物质使用的预测能力较弱(AUC = 0.68)。适度分析表明,性别、社会经济地位、家庭结构、创伤暴露、父母参与和居住地显著影响这些关系,其中创伤是最强的风险增强因素。该研究强调了文化适应行为评估的预测效用,并强调了在加纳的教育和卫生系统中进行早期筛查和以家庭为中心的干预的必要性,以减轻长期的心理健康风险。
{"title":"From Playground to Psychiatry: Examining the Predictive Validity of Childhood Behavioral Assessments for Adult Mental Health Outcomes.","authors":"Simon Ntumi, Daniel Miezah","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01984-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01984-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood behavioral difficulties are recognized as early indicators of future psychiatric disorders, yet their long-term predictive validity in non-Western settings remains underexplored. This study investigated the predictive value of childhood behavioral assessments in determining adult psychiatric outcomes among 300 individuals in Ghana followed longitudinally from childhood to early adulthood. Using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), both externalizing behaviors (e.g., aggression, hyperactivity) and internalizing behaviors (e.g., anxiety, withdrawal) were assessed between 2005 and 2015, while adult mental health outcomes including mood, anxiety, substance use, and psychotic disorders were measured with standardized diagnostic instruments such as the MINI, PHQ-9, and GAD-7. Logistic regression analyses revealed that both internalizing (B = 0.87, OR = 2.39, p < .001) and externalizing (B = 1.23, OR = 3.42, p < .001) behaviors significantly predicted adult psychiatric outcomes, even after controlling for sociodemographic factors. Exposure to trauma (OR = 4.67, p < .001) and low parental education (OR = 1.80, p < .01) increased risk, while early intervention (OR = 0.54, p < .01) served as a protective factor. The overall model demonstrated good fit and strong discriminative power (Nagelkerke R² = 0.29; AUC = 0.83). Cross-cultural validity analyses showed that childhood behavioral scores predicted adult psychiatric disorders effectively, with the strongest accuracy for mood disorders (AUC = 0.82) and overall psychiatric risk (AUC = 0.85). Moderate predictive power was found for psychotic (AUC = 0.73) and neurodevelopmental disorders (AUC = 0.75), and weaker for substance use (AUC = 0.68). Moderation analyses indicated that gender, socioeconomic status, family structure, exposure to trauma, parental involvement, and residence significantly influenced these relationships, with trauma being the strongest risk enhancer. The study highlights the predictive utility of culturally adapted behavioral assessments and underscores the need for early screening and family-centered interventions within Ghana's education and health systems to mitigate long-term mental health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147354089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-26DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01986-9
Sheema Hashem, Saba F Elhag, Zainab Awada, Waleed Aamer, Ajaz A Bhat, Aljazi Al-Maraghi, Amani Shaif, Hana Aldhaibani, Khalid Fakhro, Georges Nemer, Madeeha Kamal
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder associated with substantial academic and social impairments, yet evidence from Middle Eastern populations remains limited. This study examined demographic, clinical, academic, and social functioning profiles of Qatari youth with ADHD, with a particular focus on sex-based differences. A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary service in Qatar between 2022 and 2025, involving 131 Qatari youth aged 7-17 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD. Parents completed the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale, and clinical data on comorbidities, treatment, academic performance, and social functioning were extracted from medical records. Males comprised 71% of the sample. Although most clinical features were comparable between male and female ADHD patients, females demonstrated significantly greater peer relationship difficulties compared with males, suggesting a need for targeted social intervention in females. Academic impairments were also prevalent across both sexes. Findings underscored the functional impact of ADHD and the importance of culturally and gender-sensitive care.
{"title":"Sex-Based Differences in Clinical and Social Outcomes in Qatari Youth with ADHD.","authors":"Sheema Hashem, Saba F Elhag, Zainab Awada, Waleed Aamer, Ajaz A Bhat, Aljazi Al-Maraghi, Amani Shaif, Hana Aldhaibani, Khalid Fakhro, Georges Nemer, Madeeha Kamal","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01986-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01986-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder associated with substantial academic and social impairments, yet evidence from Middle Eastern populations remains limited. This study examined demographic, clinical, academic, and social functioning profiles of Qatari youth with ADHD, with a particular focus on sex-based differences. A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary service in Qatar between 2022 and 2025, involving 131 Qatari youth aged 7-17 years with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD. Parents completed the Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale, and clinical data on comorbidities, treatment, academic performance, and social functioning were extracted from medical records. Males comprised 71% of the sample. Although most clinical features were comparable between male and female ADHD patients, females demonstrated significantly greater peer relationship difficulties compared with males, suggesting a need for targeted social intervention in females. Academic impairments were also prevalent across both sexes. Findings underscored the functional impact of ADHD and the importance of culturally and gender-sensitive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147289026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01985-w
Kobe L Huynh, Ryan J Zamora, Grace C George, Jennie M Kuckertz, Gabriela Kovarsky Rotta, Courtney Beard, Alessandro S De Nadai
Family factors, such as parental symptomatology and parenting behaviors, are related to adolescent internalizing symptoms. Yet fewer studies have evaluated how family factors relate to the emergence of internalizing symptoms during the pubertal transition with large-scale longitudinal data. The present study addressed this issue using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study in adolescents who were prepubertal at baseline and had manifested puberty at 4-year follow-up (N = 2,276). Participants completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Adult Self Report (ASR), Child Report of Parenting Behavior Inventory (CRPBI), Parental Monitoring Survey (PMQ), and Family Environment Scale (FES). Structural equation modeling revealed that higher levels of parent internalizing symptoms and parent-reported family conflict at baseline were associated with higher levels of adolescent internalizing symptoms at the 4-year follow-up. Higher baseline parental monitoring was associated with lower adolescent internalizing symptoms at the 4-year follow-up. Baseline parental acceptance and youth-reported family conflict were not related to adolescent internalizing symptoms. Adolescent sex did not moderate any associations in our models. Our results offer insights into how research, prevention, and intervention strategies can be developed to address the development of adolescent internalizing psychopathology.
{"title":"Family Factors Associated with Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms: Longitudinal Findings from the ABCD Study.","authors":"Kobe L Huynh, Ryan J Zamora, Grace C George, Jennie M Kuckertz, Gabriela Kovarsky Rotta, Courtney Beard, Alessandro S De Nadai","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01985-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01985-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family factors, such as parental symptomatology and parenting behaviors, are related to adolescent internalizing symptoms. Yet fewer studies have evaluated how family factors relate to the emergence of internalizing symptoms during the pubertal transition with large-scale longitudinal data. The present study addressed this issue using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study in adolescents who were prepubertal at baseline and had manifested puberty at 4-year follow-up (N = 2,276). Participants completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Adult Self Report (ASR), Child Report of Parenting Behavior Inventory (CRPBI), Parental Monitoring Survey (PMQ), and Family Environment Scale (FES). Structural equation modeling revealed that higher levels of parent internalizing symptoms and parent-reported family conflict at baseline were associated with higher levels of adolescent internalizing symptoms at the 4-year follow-up. Higher baseline parental monitoring was associated with lower adolescent internalizing symptoms at the 4-year follow-up. Baseline parental acceptance and youth-reported family conflict were not related to adolescent internalizing symptoms. Adolescent sex did not moderate any associations in our models. Our results offer insights into how research, prevention, and intervention strategies can be developed to address the development of adolescent internalizing psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1007/s10578-025-01956-7
Susanna Chang, Michelle Rozenman, Giovanni Ramos, Desiree Delgadillo, Denise A Chavira
Scant research exists for interventions that are accessible and effective for rural Latine youth with mental health needs. The current study examines the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a community health worker-facilitated, attention bias modification (ABM) intervention for rural Latine youth with anxiety. Sixty-nine Latine youth (Mage = 11.74; 67% males; 44.5% low-income) with clinical levels of anxiety were randomized to either ABM (n = 34) or to an attention control condition (ACC) (n = 35). ABM included the dot-probe attention training task, where probes appeared in the location of neutral faces on 100% of trials. For ACC, probes appeared in the location of neutral faces on 50% of trials. Participants completed questionnaires, measures of attention bias and attention control, and clinician administered interviews at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Findings revealed low attrition, excellent training adherence, and favorable treatment satisfaction. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, but both groups showed significant decreases in anxiety symptoms at post-treatment. Clinician ratings of global improvement were 51% and 53% for the ABM and ACC groups respectively. Exploratory analyses examining attention bias and attention control as mechanisms of change on treatment outcomes were not significant. This is the first feasibility study of ABM in a rural Latine community, using a novel mode of delivery. Findings are promising, given excellent rates of engagement and significant decreases in anxiety over time. However, additional research is necessary to optimize anxiety improvement and identify the mechanisms of change in ABM interventions.
{"title":"Attention Bias Training for Youth with Anxiety from a Rural Latine Community.","authors":"Susanna Chang, Michelle Rozenman, Giovanni Ramos, Desiree Delgadillo, Denise A Chavira","doi":"10.1007/s10578-025-01956-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-025-01956-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scant research exists for interventions that are accessible and effective for rural Latine youth with mental health needs. The current study examines the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a community health worker-facilitated, attention bias modification (ABM) intervention for rural Latine youth with anxiety. Sixty-nine Latine youth (M<sub>age</sub> = 11.74; 67% males; 44.5% low-income) with clinical levels of anxiety were randomized to either ABM (n = 34) or to an attention control condition (ACC) (n = 35). ABM included the dot-probe attention training task, where probes appeared in the location of neutral faces on 100% of trials. For ACC, probes appeared in the location of neutral faces on 50% of trials. Participants completed questionnaires, measures of attention bias and attention control, and clinician administered interviews at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Findings revealed low attrition, excellent training adherence, and favorable treatment satisfaction. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, but both groups showed significant decreases in anxiety symptoms at post-treatment. Clinician ratings of global improvement were 51% and 53% for the ABM and ACC groups respectively. Exploratory analyses examining attention bias and attention control as mechanisms of change on treatment outcomes were not significant. This is the first feasibility study of ABM in a rural Latine community, using a novel mode of delivery. Findings are promising, given excellent rates of engagement and significant decreases in anxiety over time. However, additional research is necessary to optimize anxiety improvement and identify the mechanisms of change in ABM interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-23DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01988-7
Owen Berg, Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson, Devika Bhatia
Adolescent screentime and suicide rates increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study assesses whether specific risk and protective factors moderate the relationship between screentime and suicide outcomes in a post-COVID-19, nationally-representative sample of US adolescents. Data are from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (n = 17,232). Weighted logistical ANCOVAs tested relationships between screentime (low [≤2 h/day], medium [3-4 h/day], high [≥5 h/day]) and suicide (suicidal ideation [SI], plan, attempt), interactions of screentime and risk/protective factors (feeling sad, being bullied/cyberbullied, feeling close to people at school, sleep, and exercise), and the relationship between screentime and suicide behaviors, adjusting for significant risk/protective factors. Compared to low screentime, high screentime was associated with higher odds of all suicide behaviors (aORs = 1.30-1.96; 95% CI from 1.02 to 2.35), while medium screentime's effect varied by behavior (SI: aOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38; Plan: aOR = 1.09; 95% CI 0.92-1.29; Attempt: aOR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.98). After adjusting for combined risk factors, high screentime remained significantly associated with SI and plan (aORs = 1.39-1.62; 95% CI from 1.12 to 1.97) but not attempt (aOR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.85-1.41). In combined models, feeling close to people at school was significantly protective against SI for all levels of screentime (aORs 0.43-0.59; 95% CI from 0.35 to 0.70), and sleep was protective for SI and plan (aORs 0.59-0.60; 95% CI from 0.45 to 0.78). Among US adolescents, high screentime is a significant risk factor for suicidal ideation and plan, above and beyond other known risk factors. Findings underscore school connectedness and adequate sleep as potential areas for intervention alongside guidance on high daily screentime.
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,青少年的屏幕时间和自杀率有所上升。本研究评估了在covid -19后具有全国代表性的美国青少年样本中,特定的风险和保护因素是否调节了屏幕时间与自杀结果之间的关系。数据来自疾病控制和预防中心的2021年青少年风险行为调查(n = 17,232)。加权逻辑ANCOVAs测试了屏幕时间(低[≤2小时/天]、中[3-4小时/天]、高[≥5小时/天])与自杀(自杀意念[SI]、计划、企图)之间的关系,屏幕时间与风险/保护因素(感到悲伤、被欺负/网络欺负、在学校感觉亲近、睡眠和锻炼)之间的相互作用,以及屏幕时间与自杀行为之间的关系,并对显著风险/保护因素进行了调整。与低屏幕时间相比,高屏幕时间与所有自杀行为的高发生率相关(aOR = 1.30-1.96; 95% CI为1.02- 2.35),而中等屏幕时间的影响因行为而异(SI: aOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38;计划:aOR = 1.09; 95% CI 0.92-1.29;企图:aOR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.98)。调整综合危险因素后,高屏幕时间与SI和计划仍然显著相关(aOR = 1.39-1.62; 95% CI从1.12到1.97),但与尝试无关(aOR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.85-1.41)。在联合模型中,在学校与人亲近的感觉对所有屏幕时间水平的SI都有显著的保护作用(aor为0.43-0.59;95% CI为0.35 - 0.70),睡眠对SI和计划有保护作用(aor为0.59-0.60;95% CI为0.45 - 0.78)。在美国青少年中,长时间看屏幕是自杀意念和计划的重要风险因素,超过其他已知的风险因素。研究结果强调,与学校的联系和充足的睡眠是潜在的干预领域,同时对每天长时间的屏幕时间进行指导。
{"title":"The Association Between Youth Screentime, Suicide Behaviors, and Protective and Risk Factors in a United States Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Sample.","authors":"Owen Berg, Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson, Devika Bhatia","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01988-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01988-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescent screentime and suicide rates increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study assesses whether specific risk and protective factors moderate the relationship between screentime and suicide outcomes in a post-COVID-19, nationally-representative sample of US adolescents. Data are from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (n = 17,232). Weighted logistical ANCOVAs tested relationships between screentime (low [≤2 h/day], medium [3-4 h/day], high [≥5 h/day]) and suicide (suicidal ideation [SI], plan, attempt), interactions of screentime and risk/protective factors (feeling sad, being bullied/cyberbullied, feeling close to people at school, sleep, and exercise), and the relationship between screentime and suicide behaviors, adjusting for significant risk/protective factors. Compared to low screentime, high screentime was associated with higher odds of all suicide behaviors (aORs = 1.30-1.96; 95% CI from 1.02 to 2.35), while medium screentime's effect varied by behavior (SI: aOR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38; Plan: aOR = 1.09; 95% CI 0.92-1.29; Attempt: aOR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.98). After adjusting for combined risk factors, high screentime remained significantly associated with SI and plan (aORs = 1.39-1.62; 95% CI from 1.12 to 1.97) but not attempt (aOR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.85-1.41). In combined models, feeling close to people at school was significantly protective against SI for all levels of screentime (aORs 0.43-0.59; 95% CI from 0.35 to 0.70), and sleep was protective for SI and plan (aORs 0.59-0.60; 95% CI from 0.45 to 0.78). Among US adolescents, high screentime is a significant risk factor for suicidal ideation and plan, above and beyond other known risk factors. Findings underscore school connectedness and adequate sleep as potential areas for intervention alongside guidance on high daily screentime.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147269647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-21DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01977-w
Marília Aparecida Batista Dos Santos, Ana Elisa Palha Guerra, Marcella Monteiro Alvarenga Sayão, Ana Luiza da Silva Selani, Beatriz Cristina Betarelli, Izabelle de Faria Siqueira, Marcela Forgerini
This review examined adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) associated with the risk of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, SciELO, and LILACS. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Twenty-four studies were included, encompassing 1,119,606 participants. Family structure adversities and sexual and physical abuse were the most frequently examined exposures, although their associations with MDD varied across studies. Emotional abuse, domestic violence, and bullying were less commonly assessed but showed more consistent associations with MDD. Evidence regarding TRD was limited, with childhood neglect as a risk factor for poorer treatment response. Greater cumulative exposure to ACEs was associated with higher risk of MDD and TRD. Overall, the findings support childhood adversity as a clinically relevant determinant of depressive risk and clinical course, although heterogeneity across study designs and high risk of bias limit causal inference.
{"title":"The Role of Adverse Childhood Experiences in the Development of Major Depressive Disorder and Treatment-Resistant Depression.","authors":"Marília Aparecida Batista Dos Santos, Ana Elisa Palha Guerra, Marcella Monteiro Alvarenga Sayão, Ana Luiza da Silva Selani, Beatriz Cristina Betarelli, Izabelle de Faria Siqueira, Marcela Forgerini","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01977-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01977-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examined adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) associated with the risk of major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, SciELO, and LILACS. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Twenty-four studies were included, encompassing 1,119,606 participants. Family structure adversities and sexual and physical abuse were the most frequently examined exposures, although their associations with MDD varied across studies. Emotional abuse, domestic violence, and bullying were less commonly assessed but showed more consistent associations with MDD. Evidence regarding TRD was limited, with childhood neglect as a risk factor for poorer treatment response. Greater cumulative exposure to ACEs was associated with higher risk of MDD and TRD. Overall, the findings support childhood adversity as a clinically relevant determinant of depressive risk and clinical course, although heterogeneity across study designs and high risk of bias limit causal inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fear of hypoglycemia may represent an important target for improving diabetes self-management among adolescents with T1DM. However, whether fear of hypoglycemia is associated with diabetes self-management remains undetermined, and the factors contributing to this uncertain association are poorly understood. This study aims to (1) examine the association between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in Chinese adolescents with T1DM, and (2) explore potential mediators in this relationship. This muti-site cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2022 across three hospitals of China. Validated questionnaires assessed fear of hypoglycemia, depressive symptoms, diabetes distress and diabetes self-management. Two path analysis models were then conducted using Mplus 8.0 to test the mediating effects of diabetes distress and depressive symptoms on the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in adolescents with T1DM. A total of 174 valid questionnaires were retained (effective response rate: 82.08%). Adolescents reported moderate fear of hypoglycemia was moderate (mean score = 14.04). Path analysis revealed that the mediating effect of diabetes distress between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management was significant(indirect effect: β = -0.165 and - 0,161, p = 0.001), whereas the mediating effect of depressive symptoms was not significant. Diabetes distress partially mediated the association between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in adolescents with T1DM. Chinese adolescents with T1DM exhibited moderate fear of hypoglycemia. Diabetes distress partially mediated the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management, whereas depressive symptoms demonstrated no significant mediating effect in adolescents with T1DM. These findings suggest that interventions targeting diabetes distress reduction while maintaining fear of hypoglycemia at moderate levels may enhance diabetes self-management.
{"title":"The Mediator Testing of Association Between Fear of Hypoglycemia and Diabetes Self-Management in Chinese Adolescents with T1DM: Diabetes Distress or Depressive Symptoms?","authors":"Qingting Li, Jundi Yang, Li Fan, Ruiling Lei, Zhumin Jia, Jiaxin Luo, Jingchen Shi, Jia Guo","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01989-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01989-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear of hypoglycemia may represent an important target for improving diabetes self-management among adolescents with T1DM. However, whether fear of hypoglycemia is associated with diabetes self-management remains undetermined, and the factors contributing to this uncertain association are poorly understood. This study aims to (1) examine the association between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in Chinese adolescents with T1DM, and (2) explore potential mediators in this relationship. This muti-site cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2022 across three hospitals of China. Validated questionnaires assessed fear of hypoglycemia, depressive symptoms, diabetes distress and diabetes self-management. Two path analysis models were then conducted using Mplus 8.0 to test the mediating effects of diabetes distress and depressive symptoms on the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in adolescents with T1DM. A total of 174 valid questionnaires were retained (effective response rate: 82.08%). Adolescents reported moderate fear of hypoglycemia was moderate (mean score = 14.04). Path analysis revealed that the mediating effect of diabetes distress between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management was significant(indirect effect: β = -0.165 and - 0,161, p = 0.001), whereas the mediating effect of depressive symptoms was not significant. Diabetes distress partially mediated the association between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management in adolescents with T1DM. Chinese adolescents with T1DM exhibited moderate fear of hypoglycemia. Diabetes distress partially mediated the relationship between fear of hypoglycemia and diabetes self-management, whereas depressive symptoms demonstrated no significant mediating effect in adolescents with T1DM. These findings suggest that interventions targeting diabetes distress reduction while maintaining fear of hypoglycemia at moderate levels may enhance diabetes self-management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146257792","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s10578-026-01981-0
Julianne G Wilner, Eileen Lee, Emma Cho, Angela E Salisbury, Emily G Arnott, Kathryn Parker, Nathaniel P Shogren, Courtney Kaplan, Maria Naclerio, Josephine S Au, Jillian M Russo, Logan R Cummings, Daniel P Dickstein
Irritability is a transdiagnostic construct associated with diverse psychiatric disorders in youth. This study examined the association between food insecurity and irritability in a clinically and community-recruited sample of children aged 8-16 (N = 183). Participants and their parents completed structured interviews and measures assessing irritability, food security, and socioeconomic status (SES). Child-reported food insecurity was significantly associated with greater irritability, whereas parent-reported food insecurity was not. Regression analyses identified child-reported food insecurity as a unique predictor of irritability, independent of SES indicators. These findings underscore the clinical importance of assessing food insecurity from the childs perspective and suggest that subjective experiences of food insecurity may have a stronger emotional impact than previously recognized. Results highlight the need for multi-informant assessments and targeted interventions addressing basic needs within pediatric mental health care.
{"title":"Examining the Association Between Food Insecurity and Pediatric Irritability.","authors":"Julianne G Wilner, Eileen Lee, Emma Cho, Angela E Salisbury, Emily G Arnott, Kathryn Parker, Nathaniel P Shogren, Courtney Kaplan, Maria Naclerio, Josephine S Au, Jillian M Russo, Logan R Cummings, Daniel P Dickstein","doi":"10.1007/s10578-026-01981-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-01981-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irritability is a transdiagnostic construct associated with diverse psychiatric disorders in youth. This study examined the association between food insecurity and irritability in a clinically and community-recruited sample of children aged 8-16 (N = 183). Participants and their parents completed structured interviews and measures assessing irritability, food security, and socioeconomic status (SES). Child-reported food insecurity was significantly associated with greater irritability, whereas parent-reported food insecurity was not. Regression analyses identified child-reported food insecurity as a unique predictor of irritability, independent of SES indicators. These findings underscore the clinical importance of assessing food insecurity from the childs perspective and suggest that subjective experiences of food insecurity may have a stronger emotional impact than previously recognized. Results highlight the need for multi-informant assessments and targeted interventions addressing basic needs within pediatric mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10024,"journal":{"name":"Child Psychiatry & Human Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}