首页 > 最新文献

Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards最新文献

英文 中文
Megacities and small towns: different perspectives on hazard vulnerability 大城市和小城镇:对灾害脆弱性的不同看法
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0307
John A. Cross
Abstract The vulnerability of megacities to hazards was highlighted during the recent International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction, yet in many respects residents of small cities and rural communities are more vulnerable to disasters. Small cities and towns, deprived of the political and economic influence of megacities, lack the potential to suffer catastrophic losses that would seriously impact the global economy. Megacities, however, have greater disaster resilience. Hazard vulnerability of communities, ranging from small towns to megacities, can best be viewed as the summation of a continuum of conditions that define physical and social exposure, disaster resilience, pre-event mitigation or preparedness, and postevent response. Megacities have large populations at risk, but have the greatest resources to deal with hazards and disasters. Small communities have far smaller populations at risk, but often far higher proportions of their populations can be vulnerable. The impacts of many disasters can be experienced over the entirety of smaller communities, but many hazards lack the spatial dimension to affect an entire metropolitan area.
在最近的国际减少自然灾害十年期间,特大城市对灾害的脆弱性得到了强调,但在许多方面,小城市和农村社区的居民更容易受到灾害的影响。小城市和城镇没有大城市的政治和经济影响,不可能遭受严重影响全球经济的灾难性损失。然而,特大城市的抗灾能力更强。从小城镇到特大城市,社区的灾害脆弱性最好被视为一系列条件的总和,这些条件定义了物质和社会风险、灾害复原力、事件前的缓解或准备以及事件后的反应。特大城市面临风险的人口众多,但拥有应对灾害和灾害的最大资源。小社区面临风险的人口要少得多,但易受伤害的人口比例往往要高得多。许多灾害的影响可以波及整个较小的社区,但许多灾害缺乏影响整个大都市地区的空间维度。
{"title":"Megacities and small towns: different perspectives on hazard vulnerability","authors":"John A. Cross","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0307","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The vulnerability of megacities to hazards was highlighted during the recent International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction, yet in many respects residents of small cities and rural communities are more vulnerable to disasters. Small cities and towns, deprived of the political and economic influence of megacities, lack the potential to suffer catastrophic losses that would seriously impact the global economy. Megacities, however, have greater disaster resilience. Hazard vulnerability of communities, ranging from small towns to megacities, can best be viewed as the summation of a continuum of conditions that define physical and social exposure, disaster resilience, pre-event mitigation or preparedness, and postevent response. Megacities have large populations at risk, but have the greatest resources to deal with hazards and disasters. Small communities have far smaller populations at risk, but often far higher proportions of their populations can be vulnerable. The impacts of many disasters can be experienced over the entirety of smaller communities, but many hazards lack the spatial dimension to affect an entire metropolitan area.","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"68 1","pages":"63 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86122379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 206
Policy forum: human rights to disaster assistance and mitigation 政策论坛:援助和减轻灾害的人权
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0311
J. K. Mitchell
The pages that follow contain a variety of challenging opinions about proposed modifications of the international system for addressing problems of natural disaster. These are organized around a call for an international treaty on human rights to disaster assistance. One commentator wants the United Nations to spearhead a drive for the adoption of low cost available hazard management measures by vulnerable populations (Wisner). Another advocates replacing the present narrow attack on disasters with a broader strategy for dealing with environmental hazards (Doran). A third calls on hazard scientists to take the lead in formulating new institutions of public policy (Burton). Yet, others advocate the professionalization of emergency management (Alexander), the adoption of new treaties and standards of performance (Kent), and the empowerment of women (Enarson and Fordham). That the authors speak in support of calls for reform, but emphasize different recommendations is deliberate and appropriate because many alternative policy choices are possible and now is the time for debate as a prelude to informed action. In assessing these critiques and recommendations it may be helpful to remember that international disaster policies have come under fire frequently over the past 30 years and there have been a number of attempted reforms. The fact that major disasters still occur (and may be growing worse), suggests that these efforts have fallen well short of success. Each round of criticism has taken place against a backdrop of specific disasters and particular societal contexts, both of which have varied from decade to decade. Calls for reform in the 1970s were made in the context of unprecedently large disasters like the Bangladesh cyclone (1970) and the Sahelian drought (1970–1976). Structural changes in global institutional arrangements were also under way as a result of Cold War tensions, rising concern about human-caused environmental degradation, a vast increase in the number of poor newly independent states and growing disillusionment with the role of governments as catalysts for societal change. This round of criticism produced a spate of influential books, government reports and press accounts that called for thoroughgoing reforms of what was then unapologetically labelled the international disaster relief system. These focussed particularly on two shortcomings: (1) an emphasis on short-term postdisaster recovery tasks that ignored long-term predisaster development needs; and (2) poor coordination of the many private organizations and public agencies involved in the relief system. Many of the suggestions for improvement—especially those pertaining to better coordination—were subsequently adopted. International economic and political arrangements continued to shift dramatically in the 1980s. The trends included: a precipitous decline in the importance of European state socialist governments; a resurgence of free-market capitalism; and the emergence o
接下来的几页包含了对解决自然灾害问题的国际体系的拟议修改的各种具有挑战性的意见。这些活动是围绕一项关于灾难援助的人权国际条约的呼吁而组织起来的。一位评论员希望联合国带头推动弱势群体采用成本低廉的灾害管理措施(Wisner)。另一个主张用更广泛的策略来处理环境危害,取代目前对灾害的狭隘攻击(多兰)。第三种方法呼吁危害科学家带头制定新的公共政策制度(Burton)。然而,其他人主张应急管理专业化(亚历山大),采用新的条约和绩效标准(肯特),以及赋予妇女权力(埃纳森和福特汉姆)。报告作者支持改革呼吁,但强调不同的建议是深思熟虑和适当的,因为有许多备选政策选择是可能的,现在是辩论作为知情行动前奏的时候了。在评价这些批评和建议时,也许有必要记住,国际救灾政策在过去30年中经常受到抨击,并进行了一些改革尝试。重大灾难仍在发生(而且可能变得更糟)的事实表明,这些努力远远不够成功。每一轮的批评都是在特定的灾难和特定的社会背景下进行的,这两者在十年之间都有所不同。1970年代要求改革的呼声是在孟加拉国旋风(1970年)和萨赫勒干旱(1970 - 1976年)等前所未有的大灾害的背景下提出的。由于冷战的紧张局势、对人为造成的环境退化的日益关注、贫穷的新独立国家数量的大量增加以及对政府作为社会变革催化剂的作用的日益幻灭,全球制度安排的结构性变化也在进行中。这一轮的批评催生了大量有影响力的书籍、政府报告和媒体报道,它们呼吁对当时被贴上无可辩驳标签的国际救灾体系进行彻底改革。这些建议特别侧重于两个缺点:(1)强调短期灾后恢复任务,忽视了长期的灾前发展需求;(2)参与救援系统的许多私人组织和公共机构协调不力。许多改进建议,特别是关于更好协调的建议,后来被采纳。国际经济和政治安排在1980年代继续发生巨大变化。这些趋势包括:欧洲国家社会主义政府的重要性急剧下降;自由市场资本主义的复苏;以及以美国、日本和欧洲为中心的三大全球经济强国的出现。1970年代提出的灾害管理改革对这一时期困扰非洲大部分地区的与干旱有关的灾害和经济危机影响不大。国际名人筹款音乐会形式的应急响应获得了更多的关注。很少有非常大的突发灾难。那些确实发生过的(例如,1985年哥伦比亚的火山爆发;(1988年亚美尼亚地震),似乎特别适合技术驱动的解决方案(例如改进的预警技术和更好的建筑实践)。在灾害科学家和工程师中,有相当多的人乐观地认为,有可能在减少灾害造成的损失方面取得进展。关于通过改进现有灾害科学和管理知识的应用来减少损失的全球方案的可行性的讨论最终产生了一个无赞助的国际减少自然灾害十年(减灾十年,1990-1999年)。近10年来,具体的特大灾害再次集中了专家和非专业人士的注意力;这一次最著名的是中美洲的米奇飓风(1998年)、日本神户地震(1995年)、土耳其东部地震(1999年)和印度西部地震(2001年)。与20世纪70年代和80年代一样,国际治理体系和公共问责制正处于动荡之中,但这一次,起作用的力量(如全球经济结构调整、后冷战政治、新信息技术、大规模城乡人口转移和后现代文化等)似乎比二三十年前的力量更根深蒂固、影响更深远。然而,由于编辑过程中不可避免的延误,本论坛的出现时间比原计划晚。编辑们要感谢作者们的耐心。
{"title":"Policy forum: human rights to disaster assistance and mitigation","authors":"J. K. Mitchell","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0311","url":null,"abstract":"The pages that follow contain a variety of challenging opinions about proposed modifications of the international system for addressing problems of natural disaster. These are organized around a call for an international treaty on human rights to disaster assistance. One commentator wants the United Nations to spearhead a drive for the adoption of low cost available hazard management measures by vulnerable populations (Wisner). Another advocates replacing the present narrow attack on disasters with a broader strategy for dealing with environmental hazards (Doran). A third calls on hazard scientists to take the lead in formulating new institutions of public policy (Burton). Yet, others advocate the professionalization of emergency management (Alexander), the adoption of new treaties and standards of performance (Kent), and the empowerment of women (Enarson and Fordham). That the authors speak in support of calls for reform, but emphasize different recommendations is deliberate and appropriate because many alternative policy choices are possible and now is the time for debate as a prelude to informed action. In assessing these critiques and recommendations it may be helpful to remember that international disaster policies have come under fire frequently over the past 30 years and there have been a number of attempted reforms. The fact that major disasters still occur (and may be growing worse), suggests that these efforts have fallen well short of success. Each round of criticism has taken place against a backdrop of specific disasters and particular societal contexts, both of which have varied from decade to decade. Calls for reform in the 1970s were made in the context of unprecedently large disasters like the Bangladesh cyclone (1970) and the Sahelian drought (1970–1976). Structural changes in global institutional arrangements were also under way as a result of Cold War tensions, rising concern about human-caused environmental degradation, a vast increase in the number of poor newly independent states and growing disillusionment with the role of governments as catalysts for societal change. This round of criticism produced a spate of influential books, government reports and press accounts that called for thoroughgoing reforms of what was then unapologetically labelled the international disaster relief system. These focussed particularly on two shortcomings: (1) an emphasis on short-term postdisaster recovery tasks that ignored long-term predisaster development needs; and (2) poor coordination of the many private organizations and public agencies involved in the relief system. Many of the suggestions for improvement—especially those pertaining to better coordination—were subsequently adopted. International economic and political arrangements continued to shift dramatically in the 1980s. The trends included: a precipitous decline in the importance of European state socialist governments; a resurgence of free-market capitalism; and the emergence o","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"83 1","pages":"123 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89853469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
From women's needs to women's rights in disasters 从妇女的需求到灾害中的妇女权利
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0314
E. Enarson, M. Fordham
Writing after a major Australian flood, an observer noted that women’s concerns after the flood were ‘‘an extreme version of what they did before the flood’’ (Dobson, 1994, p. 11). Child care, domestic labor, employment and community work all increased, as did violence against women and strain on caregiving networks. ‘‘Human relationships were laid bare and the strengths and weaknesses in relationships came more sharply into focus.’’ As violation of women’s rights is also more stark when catastrophic events transform physical and social worlds, we make a practical and a political case for explicitly addressing gender equality in the Treaty on human rights to disaster assistance proposed by Wisner and others in the preceding papers.
在澳大利亚的一场大洪水之后,一位观察者写道,女性在洪水之后所关心的事情是“她们在洪水之前所做事情的极端版本”(多布森,1994年,第11页)。儿童保育、家务劳动、就业和社区工作都有所增加,对妇女的暴力行为和护理网络的压力也有所增加。“人际关系暴露无遗,人际关系中的优势和劣势变得更加突出。由于当灾难性事件改变物理和社会世界时,对妇女权利的侵犯也更加明显,因此我们提出了一个实际的和政治的案例,即在Wisner等人在前面的论文中提出的《灾难援助人权条约》中明确解决性别平等问题。
{"title":"From women's needs to women's rights in disasters","authors":"E. Enarson, M. Fordham","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0314","url":null,"abstract":"Writing after a major Australian flood, an observer noted that women’s concerns after the flood were ‘‘an extreme version of what they did before the flood’’ (Dobson, 1994, p. 11). Child care, domestic labor, employment and community work all increased, as did violence against women and strain on caregiving networks. ‘‘Human relationships were laid bare and the strengths and weaknesses in relationships came more sharply into focus.’’ As violation of women’s rights is also more stark when catastrophic events transform physical and social worlds, we make a practical and a political case for explicitly addressing gender equality in the Treaty on human rights to disaster assistance proposed by Wisner and others in the preceding papers.","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"4 1","pages":"133 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89234755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102
Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience 洪水保险和洪泛区管理:美国的经验
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0310
R. Burby
Abstract With over six million buildings located within the boundaries of the 100-yr floodplain, flood losses across the United States are widespread (88% of US counties experienced at least one flood disaster during the second half of the twentieth century). To deal with this problem, the federal government provides flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program, which was initiated by Congress in 1968 and amended significantly in 1969, 1973, and 1994. This article describes the US approach to flood insurance and notes a number of problems that have limited its effectiveness. Flood hazard identification is incomplete, and methods used are flawed. Mitigation has failed to contain increasing exposure to property damage in floods and coastal storms, and it has failed to markedly reduce exposure to loss of older buildings located in flood hazard areas. Market penetration of flood insurance is low, in spite of mandatory purchase requirements for new construction and the availability of subsidized insurance rates for older buildings located in flood-hazard areas. These problems, although serious, can be remedied through a variety of actions taken by governments at the federal, state, and local level.
美国有超过600万幢建筑位于100年洪泛区的边界内,美国各地的洪水损失非常广泛(88%的美国县在20世纪下半叶至少经历过一次洪水灾害)。为了解决这个问题,联邦政府通过国家洪水保险计划提供洪水保险,该计划于1968年由国会发起,并于1969年,1973年和1994年进行了重大修订。本文描述了美国实施洪水保险的方法,并指出了一些限制其有效性的问题。洪水灾害识别不完整,使用的方法有缺陷。缓解措施未能遏制洪水和沿海风暴造成的日益严重的财产损失,也未能显著减少洪水危险地区旧建筑物的损失。洪水保险的市场渗透率很低,尽管新建筑有强制性购买规定,而且位于洪水危险地区的旧建筑物也有补贴保险费率。这些问题虽然严重,但可以通过联邦、州和地方各级政府采取的各种行动加以补救。
{"title":"Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience","authors":"R. Burby","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0310","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With over six million buildings located within the boundaries of the 100-yr floodplain, flood losses across the United States are widespread (88% of US counties experienced at least one flood disaster during the second half of the twentieth century). To deal with this problem, the federal government provides flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Program, which was initiated by Congress in 1968 and amended significantly in 1969, 1973, and 1994. This article describes the US approach to flood insurance and notes a number of problems that have limited its effectiveness. Flood hazard identification is incomplete, and methods used are flawed. Mitigation has failed to contain increasing exposure to property damage in floods and coastal storms, and it has failed to markedly reduce exposure to loss of older buildings located in flood hazard areas. Market penetration of flood insurance is low, in spite of mandatory purchase requirements for new construction and the availability of subsidized insurance rates for older buildings located in flood-hazard areas. These problems, although serious, can be remedied through a variety of actions taken by governments at the federal, state, and local level.","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"309 1","pages":"111 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76616612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 252
The secret history of natural disaster 自然灾害的秘史
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0304
T. Steinberg
Abstract This paper explores the failure of historians to properly engage the study of natural hazards. It argues that by focusing mainly on individual calamities, historians have overlooked the larger social and economic forces that have shaped the response to natural disaster over the last century. Two important trends, real estate capitalism and the entry of the state into the political economy of hazards after World War II, are singled out as crucial for understanding US society's response to natural disaster. As a result of these historical forces, risk became a commodity, with harmful environmental consequences.
摘要本文探讨了历史学家在研究自然灾害方面的失败。它认为,由于主要关注个别灾难,历史学家忽视了更大的社会和经济力量,这些力量在上个世纪影响了人们对自然灾害的反应。有两个重要的趋势,房地产资本主义和国家在二战后进入危险的政治经济学,被挑选出来作为理解美国社会对自然灾害反应的关键。由于这些历史因素,风险变成了一种商品,对环境造成了有害的后果。
{"title":"The secret history of natural disaster","authors":"T. Steinberg","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0304","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the failure of historians to properly engage the study of natural hazards. It argues that by focusing mainly on individual calamities, historians have overlooked the larger social and economic forces that have shaped the response to natural disaster over the last century. Two important trends, real estate capitalism and the entry of the state into the political economy of hazards after World War II, are singled out as crucial for understanding US society's response to natural disaster. As a result of these historical forces, risk became a commodity, with harmful environmental consequences.","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"3 1","pages":"31 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87403141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Improving flood warnings in Europe: a research and policy agenda 改善欧洲洪水预警:一项研究和政策议程
Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0302
J. Handmer
Abstract Warnings and emergency planning for flooding are based on the reality that no matter how thorough our investigations and flood prevention efforts through engineered structural works or land use management, some risk will always remain. This paper examines recent experience with flood warnings in the UK and continental Europe. It combines this experience with an overview of the relevant literature to identify lessons for incorporation into policy, and problem areas which would most obviously benefit from additional research. Throughout, the emphasis is on the non-engineering aspects of warning systems. Results indicate that much is being achieved in terms of the detail of warning design, but the broader issues seem to be largely ignored by both the research literature and practice. First among these broader issues is the failure, by those charged with warning system development and operation, to conceptualise the warning task as one based explicitly on the needs of those at risk. Making this happen will require the development of processes to build the necessary culture of cooperation and learning among the many organisations involved.
洪水预警和应急计划是基于这样一个现实:无论我们通过工程结构工程或土地利用管理进行多么彻底的调查和防洪努力,总会存在一些风险。本文考察了英国和欧洲大陆最近的洪水预警经验。它将这一经验与有关文献的概述结合起来,以确定纳入政策的教训,以及最明显受益于进一步研究的问题领域。在整个过程中,重点是非工程方面的预警系统。结果表明,在预警设计的细节方面取得了很大的成就,但更广泛的问题似乎在很大程度上被研究文献和实践所忽视。在这些更广泛的问题中,首先是那些负责预警系统开发和操作的人未能将预警任务明确地定义为基于风险人群需求的任务。要实现这一目标,就需要制定流程,在众多相关组织之间建立必要的合作和学习文化。
{"title":"Improving flood warnings in Europe: a research and policy agenda","authors":"J. Handmer","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2001.0302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2001.0302","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Warnings and emergency planning for flooding are based on the reality that no matter how thorough our investigations and flood prevention efforts through engineered structural works or land use management, some risk will always remain. This paper examines recent experience with flood warnings in the UK and continental Europe. It combines this experience with an overview of the relevant literature to identify lessons for incorporation into policy, and problem areas which would most obviously benefit from additional research. Throughout, the emphasis is on the non-engineering aspects of warning systems. Results indicate that much is being achieved in terms of the detail of warning design, but the broader issues seem to be largely ignored by both the research literature and practice. First among these broader issues is the failure, by those charged with warning system development and operation, to conceptualise the warning task as one based explicitly on the needs of those at risk. Making this happen will require the development of processes to build the necessary culture of cooperation and learning among the many organisations involved.","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"72 1","pages":"19 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88321533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72
Public orders and personal opinions: household strategies for hurricane risk assessment 公共秩序与个人意见:飓风风险评估的家庭策略
Pub Date : 2000-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6
Kirstin Dow, Susan L Cutter

This paper examines the relationship between household evacuation decisions and official emergency management practices in light of recent increases in the availability and diversity of hurricane-related information. While we focus on Hurricane Floyd in South Carolina, we incorporate findings of our longitudinal research effort covering the last four years and six post-1995 hurricane threats to the state. While only 64% of residents in the mandatory evacuation zone complied with the Hurricane Floyd evacuation order, over 80% agreed that calling an evacuation was an appropriate precautionary response given the uncertainties of the storm. Longitudinal surveys indicate that Horry County residents have developed a fairly robust strategy in making evacuation decisions. This “hurricane savvy” population depends more heavily on individuals’ assessments of risks than on official orders. Individual assessment practices differ from official orders in that greater weight is given to household circumstances and preferences, the diligent monitoring of a variety of information sources, and the incorporation of past experiences into the decision-making process. Surveys indicate differences between the general public and officials in terms of priorities and preferences about hurricane evacuations. The public demands more information about the hurricane threat. Officials place more emphasis on planning evacuation routes and public safety measures.

鉴于最近飓风相关信息的可用性和多样性的增加,本文研究了家庭疏散决策与官方应急管理实践之间的关系。当我们专注于南卡罗来纳的弗洛伊德飓风时,我们结合了我们的纵向研究成果,涵盖了过去四年和1995年后对该州的六次飓风威胁。虽然只有64%的强制疏散区居民遵守了“弗洛伊德”飓风的疏散令,但超过80%的人认为,考虑到风暴的不确定性,疏散是一种适当的预防措施。纵向调查表明,霍利县的居民在做出疏散决定时已经制定了相当稳健的策略。这些“飓风专家”更多地依赖于个人对风险的评估,而不是官方命令。个别评估做法不同于官方命令,因为它更重视家庭情况和偏好,认真监测各种信息来源,并将过去的经验纳入决策过程。调查显示,在飓风疏散的优先事项和偏好方面,公众和官员之间存在差异。公众要求更多关于飓风威胁的信息。官员们更加重视规划疏散路线和公共安全措施。
{"title":"Public orders and personal opinions: household strategies for hurricane risk assessment","authors":"Kirstin Dow,&nbsp;Susan L Cutter","doi":"10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the relationship between household evacuation decisions and official emergency management practices in light of recent increases in the availability and diversity of hurricane-related information. While we focus on Hurricane Floyd in South Carolina, we incorporate findings of our longitudinal research effort covering the last four years and six post-1995 hurricane threats to the state. While only 64% of residents in the mandatory evacuation zone complied with the Hurricane Floyd evacuation order, over 80% agreed that calling an evacuation was an appropriate precautionary response given the uncertainties of the storm. Longitudinal surveys indicate that Horry County residents have developed a fairly robust strategy in making evacuation decisions. This “hurricane savvy” population depends more heavily on individuals’ assessments of risks than on official orders. Individual assessment practices differ from official orders in that greater weight is given to household circumstances and preferences, the diligent monitoring of a variety of information sources, and the incorporation of past experiences into the decision-making process. Surveys indicate differences between the general public and officials in terms of priorities and preferences about hurricane evacuations. The public demands more information about the hurricane threat. Officials place more emphasis on planning evacuation routes and public safety measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 143-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138260738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modeling flooding extent from Hurricane Floyd in the coastal plains of North Carolina 模拟飓风弗洛伊德在北卡罗莱纳州沿海平原造成的洪水范围
Pub Date : 2000-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00012-2
Jeffrey D Colby, Karen A Mulcahy, Yong Wang

In this article two modeling approaches were developed based on the use of US Geological Survey digital elevation model (DEM) data. These models were utilized to delineate the extent of flooding induced by precipitation from Hurricane Floyd in a portion of Pitt County, North Carolina. The patterns of flood extent derived from the two models were compared to the extent of flooding indicated on a digital aerial photograph taken two days after peak flood levels had been reached. In addition, floodplain boundaries based on Federal Emergency Management Agency Q3 maps were compared to the extent of flooding on the aerial photo. Actual emergency response operations undertaken through the Pitt County Emergency Operations Center during the flood event are described, and are used to provide a context for evaluating the potential utility of these models. The flood extents produced by the modeling methods performed well at representing the actual extent of the flooding.

本文基于美国地质调查局数字高程模型(DEM)数据开发了两种建模方法。这些模型被用来描述飓风弗洛伊德在北卡罗来纳州皮特县部分地区降水引起的洪水程度。从这两个模型得出的洪水范围模式与在洪水达到峰值后两天拍摄的数字航空照片所显示的洪水范围进行了比较。此外,将基于联邦紧急事务管理局Q3地图的洪泛区边界与航空照片上的洪水范围进行了比较。描述了在洪水事件期间通过皮特县紧急行动中心开展的实际应急响应行动,并用于提供评估这些模型潜在效用的背景。通过建模方法得到的洪水范围较好地代表了实际的洪水范围。
{"title":"Modeling flooding extent from Hurricane Floyd in the coastal plains of North Carolina","authors":"Jeffrey D Colby,&nbsp;Karen A Mulcahy,&nbsp;Yong Wang","doi":"10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00012-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00012-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article two modeling approaches were developed based on the use of US Geological Survey digital elevation model (DEM) data. These models were utilized to delineate the extent of flooding induced by precipitation from Hurricane Floyd in a portion of Pitt County, North Carolina. The patterns of flood extent derived from the two models were compared to the extent of flooding indicated on a digital aerial photograph taken two days after peak flood levels had been reached. In addition, floodplain boundaries based on Federal Emergency Management Agency Q3 maps were compared to the extent of flooding on the aerial photo. Actual emergency response operations undertaken through the Pitt County Emergency Operations Center during the flood event are described, and are used to provide a context for evaluating the potential utility of these models. The flood extents produced by the modeling methods performed well at representing the actual extent of the flooding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 157-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00012-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138260740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Volume Contents & Author Index 卷内容和作者索引
Pub Date : 2000-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00017-1
{"title":"Volume Contents & Author Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00017-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00017-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages I-V"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00017-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138260539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior 前往高地:影响真实和假想飓风疏散行为的因素
Pub Date : 2000-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4
John C Whitehead , Bob Edwards , Marieke Van Willigen , John R Maiolo , Kenneth Wilson , Kevin T Smith

The purpose of this paper is to assess the determinants of hurricane evacuation behavior of North Carolina coastal households during Hurricane Bonnie and a future hypothetical hurricane. We use the data from a telephone survey of North Carolina coastal residents. Hypothetical questions are used to assess whether respondents will evacuate and where in the case of a future hurricane with varying intensities. We examine the social, economic, and risk factors that affect the decisions to evacuate and whether to go to a shelter or motel/hotel relative to other destinations. The most important predictor of evacuation is storm intensity. Households are more likely to evacuate when given evacuation orders, when they perceive a flood risk, and when they live in mobile homes. Households who own pets are less likely to evacuate. Non-white households, pet owners and those with more education are less likely to go to either a motel/hotel or shelter, preferring instead to stay with friends or family.

本文的目的是评估在飓风邦尼和未来假想飓风期间北卡罗来纳州沿海家庭的飓风疏散行为的决定因素。我们使用的数据来自北卡罗来纳州沿海居民的电话调查。假设问题被用来评估受访者是否会撤离,以及在未来发生不同强度飓风的情况下撤离到哪里。我们研究了影响撤离决策的社会、经济和风险因素,以及是否去避难所或汽车旅馆/酒店相对于其他目的地。疏散最重要的预测指标是风暴强度。当收到疏散命令,当他们意识到有洪水风险,当他们住在移动房屋中时,家庭更有可能撤离。养宠物的家庭不太可能撤离。非白人家庭、宠物主人和受教育程度较高的人不太可能去汽车旅馆/酒店或庇护所,而是更愿意和朋友或家人住在一起。
{"title":"Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior","authors":"John C Whitehead ,&nbsp;Bob Edwards ,&nbsp;Marieke Van Willigen ,&nbsp;John R Maiolo ,&nbsp;Kenneth Wilson ,&nbsp;Kevin T Smith","doi":"10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to assess the determinants of hurricane evacuation behavior of North Carolina coastal households during Hurricane Bonnie and a future hypothetical hurricane. We use the data from a telephone survey of North Carolina coastal residents. Hypothetical questions are used to assess whether respondents will evacuate and where in the case of a future hurricane with varying intensities. We examine the social, economic, and risk factors that affect the decisions to evacuate and whether to go to a shelter or motel/hotel relative to other destinations. The most important predictor of evacuation is storm intensity. Households are more likely to evacuate when given evacuation orders, when they perceive a flood risk, and when they live in mobile homes. Households who own pets are less likely to evacuate. Non-white households, pet owners and those with more education are less likely to go to either a motel/hotel or shelter, preferring instead to stay with friends or family.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100587,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 133-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138260739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1