Yongxin Lin, Guiping Ye, Hang-Wei Hu, Weixin Ding, Jianbo Fan, Zi-Yang He, Ji-Zheng He
Predatory protists are widely recognized as critical biotic forces driving soil microbial communities, but their top-down controls on ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOMs), the major players in nitrification, are largely unresolved. Here, we investigated the communities of predatory protists and their associations with AOMs using high-throughput sequencing and network analysis in soil aggregates following various long-term organic substitutions. We found that organic substitutions increased while soil aggregation decreased the alpha diversity of predatory protists. Predatory protistan communities were significantly associated with AOMs. Variosea, an important group of Amoebozoa, were the keystone predatory protists associated with the AOMs. Collectively, our findings highlight the importance of predatory protists, especially Variosea, in regulating the communities of AOMs in an acidic Ultsisol, with implications for managing nitrification by predatory protists in agricultural soils.
{"title":"Keystone predatory protists are associated closely with ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in an acidic Ultisol","authors":"Yongxin Lin, Guiping Ye, Hang-Wei Hu, Weixin Ding, Jianbo Fan, Zi-Yang He, Ji-Zheng He","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12076","DOIUrl":"10.1002/sae2.12076","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predatory protists are widely recognized as critical biotic forces driving soil microbial communities, but their top-down controls on ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOMs), the major players in nitrification, are largely unresolved. Here, we investigated the communities of predatory protists and their associations with AOMs using high-throughput sequencing and network analysis in soil aggregates following various long-term organic substitutions. We found that organic substitutions increased while soil aggregation decreased the alpha diversity of predatory protists. Predatory protistan communities were significantly associated with AOMs. Variosea, an important group of Amoebozoa, were the keystone predatory protists associated with the AOMs. Collectively, our findings highlight the importance of predatory protists, especially Variosea, in regulating the communities of AOMs in an acidic Ultsisol, with implications for managing nitrification by predatory protists in agricultural soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136213291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Crop production depends on input of nitrogen (N) but because N-use efficiency is low in current conventional cropping systems, farmers fertilize much more than the plants need. More than 50% of added fertilizer N is lost to the environment, mainly as nitrate and gaseous N, that is, dinitrogen, nitrous oxide (N2O), and ammonia (Lassaletta et al., 2014). Apart from deteriorating water quality and negatively impacting biodiversity, a main concern is the emissions of the greenhouse gas N2O. Nitrous oxide exhibits a global warming potential approximately 300 times higher than that of CO2, and the N2O concentration in the atmosphere is increasing at an accelerating rate (Thompson et al., 2019). Anthropogenic sources contribute ca. 45% to global N2O emissions, with direct and indirect emissions from N additions in agriculture accounting for ca. 50% (Tian et al., 2020). The negative consequences of N fertilisation therefore make the global food system a key target to limit climate change (Clark et al., 2020) and allow humanity to remain within a safe operating space of the Earth system.
A main challenge for sustainable agriculture is to increase N-use efficiency in cropping systems without compromising yields. One possibility is to improve the retention of soil N by increasing the time N stays in the form of ammonium, as ammonium adsorbs clay particles and soil organic matter. This can be done by using nitrification inhibitors that hinder the microbially mediated oxidation of ammonium to nitrate (Coskun et al., 2017) or by supporting nitrate ammonification, an overlooked process in the N cycle in which nitrate is reduced via nitrite to ammonium (a process also known as dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium [DNRA]). Similar to the competing process of denitrification, nitrate ammonification is performed by phylogenetically diverse microorganisms, which couple the oxidation of various electron donors, most often organic carbon compounds, to the reduction of nitrate under anoxic conditions. Nitrate ammonification creates a short-circuit in the N cycle, bypassing denitrification and N-fixation, and can thereby contribute to primary production (Figure 1). There is, however, a possible risk of ammonia volatilization in alkaline soils. By contrast, the reduction of nitrate to gaseous N oxides through denitrification always results in ecosystem N losses, with a substantial amount emitted as N2O. Thus, the predominant nitrate reduction pathway affects the fate of nitrate and may have major consequences for N-use efficiency in cropping systems and possibly also climate change.
In this commentary, we highlight challenges and key research questions that need to be addressed to be able to evaluate the promises of nitrate ammonification and the feasibility of exploiting this process in sustainable agriculture. These in
作物生产依赖于氮的投入,但由于目前传统种植系统中氮的利用效率很低,农民施用的肥料远远超过了植物的需要。添加的肥料氮有50%以上以硝酸盐和气态氮的形式流失到环境中,即二氮、氧化亚氮(N2O)和氨(Lassaletta et al., 2014)。除了水质恶化和对生物多样性产生负面影响外,一个主要问题是温室气体一氧化二氮的排放。一氧化二氮的全球变暖潜能值约为二氧化碳的300倍,大气中N2O浓度正在加速增加(Thompson et al., 2019)。人为源约占全球N2O排放的45%,其中农业氮素添加的直接和间接排放约占50% (Tian et al., 2020)。因此,氮肥的负面影响使全球粮食系统成为限制气候变化的关键目标(Clark et al., 2020),并使人类保持在地球系统的安全运行空间内。可持续农业面临的一个主要挑战是在不影响产量的情况下提高种植系统的氮利用效率。一种可能是通过增加氮以铵形式停留的时间来提高土壤氮的保留,因为铵可以吸附粘土颗粒和土壤有机质。这可以通过使用阻碍微生物介导的氨氧化为硝酸盐的硝化抑制剂(Coskun等人,2017)或通过支持硝酸盐氨化来实现,这是氮循环中一个被忽视的过程,其中硝酸盐通过亚硝酸盐还原为铵(该过程也称为异化硝酸盐还原为铵[DNRA])。与反硝化的竞争过程类似,硝酸盐的氨化作用是由系统发育不同的微生物进行的,它们将各种电子供体(通常是有机碳化合物)的氧化与缺氧条件下硝酸盐的还原结合起来。硝态氨化在氮循环中造成短路,绕过反硝化和固氮作用,从而有助于初级生产(图1)。然而,在碱性土壤中可能存在氨挥发的风险。相反,通过反硝化作用将硝酸盐还原为气态氮氧化物总是导致生态系统N的损失,其中大量以N2O的形式排放。因此,主要的硝酸盐还原途径影响硝酸盐的命运,并可能对种植系统的氮利用效率产生重大影响,甚至可能对气候变化产生重大影响。在这篇评论中,我们强调了需要解决的挑战和关键研究问题,以便能够评估硝酸盐氨化的前景和在可持续农业中利用这一过程的可行性。这些包括(i)估算通过氨化作用与矿化作用产生铵的相对重要性,(ii)确定硝酸盐氨化器对N2O还原和生产的贡献,(iii)评估促进硝酸盐氨化作用而非反硝化作用的生物和非生物因素,以及(iv)探索利用植物性状促进硝酸盐氨化作用和提高作物系统氮利用效率的可能性。在农田和管理草原之间,硝酸盐氨化速率差异很大(支持信息:表S1)。然而,与土壤中其他铵源相比,它能贡献多少氮还不确定。当将这些速率与总N矿化速率进行比较时,硝酸盐氨化作用在0%至50%之间(平均约为6%,中位数约为1%);支持资料:表S1)为农田和草地产生的铵,未考虑以前产生的铵被土壤颗粒吸附的释放量。为了进行比较,我们主要选择了基于15N同位素土壤培养试验的研究,结合使用数值解的示踪模型,可以同时量化和比较多个N转换(r<e:1>等,2011)。虽然这些研究表明硝酸盐氨化作用可能与可持续农业有关,但这些估计是基于有限数量的研究和土壤类型以及不同的模型和假设。此外,添加底物后铵态氮和硝态氮的浓度也可能影响硝酸盐的命运,考虑到硝酸盐在低硝酸盐水平下更有利(Saghaï et al., 2023;van den Berg et al., 2016)。因此,需要进行更多的工作,以更好地定量了解土壤N通量,同时认识到作物轮作中铵的吸收和释放,并更有代表性地了解在种植系统中铵化与矿化对输送铵的相对重要性。 农作物的产量取决于氮(N)的投入,但由于目前传统耕作制度中氮(N)的利用效率较低,农民施肥量远远超过植物的需要。50%以上的化肥氮会流失到环境中,主要是硝酸盐和气态氮,即二氮、一氧化二氮(N2O)和氨(Lassaletta 等人,2014 年)。除了水质恶化和对生物多样性产生负面影响外,温室气体一氧化二氮的排放也是一个主要问题。一氧化二氮的全球升温潜能值约为二氧化碳的 300 倍,大气中的一氧化二氮浓度正在加速上升(Thompson 等人,2019 年)。人为来源约占全球一氧化二氮排放量的 45%。占全球一氧化二氮排放量的 45%,其中农业中氮添加的直接和间接排放量约占 50%(Tian 等人,2019 年)。50%(Tian 等人,2020 年)。因此,氮肥的负面影响使全球粮食系统成为限制气候变化的关键目标(Clark 等人,2020 年),并使人类能够保持在地球系统的安全运行空间内。可持续农业面临的一个主要挑战是在不影响产量的情况下提高耕作系统中氮的利用效率。一种可能的方法是通过增加氮以铵形式存在的时间来提高土壤中氮的保留率,因为铵会吸附粘土颗粒和土壤有机物。这可以通过使用硝化抑制剂来实现,硝化抑制剂会阻碍微生物介导的铵氧化成硝酸盐(Coskun 等人,2017 年),或者通过支持硝酸盐氨化来实现,硝酸盐氨化是氮循环中一个被忽视的过程,硝酸盐通过亚硝酸盐还原成铵(该过程也称为硝酸盐异氨还原成铵 [DNRA])。与相互竞争的反硝化过程类似,硝酸盐氨化也是由系统发育多样的微生物进行的,它们在缺氧条件下将各种电子供体(通常是有机碳化合物)的氧化与硝酸盐的还原结合起来。硝酸盐氨化在氮循环中形成了一条短路,绕过了反硝化和固氮作用,从而有助于初级生产(图 1)。不过,在碱性土壤中可能存在氨挥发的风险。相比之下,通过反硝化作用将硝酸盐还原成气态氮氧化物总会导致生态系统中氮的损失,其中大量的氮氧化物以 N2O 的形式排放。因此,主要的硝酸盐还原途径会影响硝酸盐的归宿,并可能对耕作系统中的氮利用效率以及气候变化产生重大影响。在这篇评论中,我们强调了需要解决的挑战和关键研究问题,以便能够评估硝酸盐氨化的前景以及在可持续农业中利用这一过程的可行性。这些问题包括:(i) 估算通过氨化和矿化产生铵的相对重要性;(ii) 确定硝酸盐氨化剂对一氧化二氮还原和产生的贡献;(iii) 评估促进硝酸盐氨化而不是反硝化的生物和非生物因素;(iv) 探索利用植物特性促进硝酸盐氨化和提高种植系统中氮利用效率的可能性。然而,与土壤中的其他铵源相比,硝酸盐氨化贡献了多少氮还不确定。将这些氨化率与总氮矿化率相比,硝酸盐氨化占耕地和草地中产生的铵的 0% 到 50% 之间(平均约为 6%,中位数约为 1%;佐证资料:表 S1),这还不包括吸附在土壤颗粒上的先前产生的铵的释放。为了进行比较,我们主要选择了基于 15N 同位素土壤培养试验的研究,这些研究结合了使用数值解决方案的追踪模型,可以同时量化和比较多种氮转化(Rütting 等人,2011 年)。虽然这些研究表明硝酸盐氨化可能与可持续农业有关,但这些估计值是基于有限的研究和土壤类型以及不同的模型和假设得出的。此外,考虑到硝酸盐氨化剂在低硝酸盐水平下更受青睐,基质添加后铵和硝酸盐的浓度也可能影响硝酸盐的归宿(Saghaï 等人,2023 年;van den Berg 等人,2016 年)。因此,还需要开展更多的工作,以便更好地定量了解土壤氮通量,同时考虑到铵在作物轮作中不同年份的吸附和释放,并更有代表性地了解氨化与矿化在作物系统中提供铵的相对重要性。 加强氨化的一个可能好处是减少N2O排放,正如陆地生物群系生态系统尺度上硝酸盐氨化速率与N2O排放之
{"title":"Can nitrate-reducing ammonifiers increase nitrogen retention in soil and support ammonium-based cropping systems?","authors":"Sara Hallin, Aurélien Saghaï","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12073","DOIUrl":"10.1002/sae2.12073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop production depends on input of nitrogen (N) but because N-use efficiency is low in current conventional cropping systems, farmers fertilize much more than the plants need. More than 50% of added fertilizer N is lost to the environment, mainly as nitrate and gaseous N, that is, dinitrogen, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), and ammonia (Lassaletta et al., <span>2014</span>). Apart from deteriorating water quality and negatively impacting biodiversity, a main concern is the emissions of the greenhouse gas N<sub>2</sub>O. Nitrous oxide exhibits a global warming potential approximately 300 times higher than that of CO<sub>2</sub>, and the N<sub>2</sub>O concentration in the atmosphere is increasing at an accelerating rate (Thompson et al., <span>2019</span>). Anthropogenic sources contribute ca. 45% to global N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, with direct and indirect emissions from N additions in agriculture accounting for ca. 50% (Tian et al., <span>2020</span>). The negative consequences of N fertilisation therefore make the global food system a key target to limit climate change (Clark et al., <span>2020</span>) and allow humanity to remain within a safe operating space of the Earth system.</p><p>A main challenge for sustainable agriculture is to increase N-use efficiency in cropping systems without compromising yields. One possibility is to improve the retention of soil N by increasing the time N stays in the form of ammonium, as ammonium adsorbs clay particles and soil organic matter. This can be done by using nitrification inhibitors that hinder the microbially mediated oxidation of ammonium to nitrate (Coskun et al., <span>2017</span>) or by supporting nitrate ammonification, an overlooked process in the N cycle in which nitrate is reduced via nitrite to ammonium (a process also known as dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium [DNRA]). Similar to the competing process of denitrification, nitrate ammonification is performed by phylogenetically diverse microorganisms, which couple the oxidation of various electron donors, most often organic carbon compounds, to the reduction of nitrate under anoxic conditions. Nitrate ammonification creates a short-circuit in the N cycle, bypassing denitrification and N-fixation, and can thereby contribute to primary production (Figure 1). There is, however, a possible risk of ammonia volatilization in alkaline soils. By contrast, the reduction of nitrate to gaseous N oxides through denitrification always results in ecosystem N losses, with a substantial amount emitted as N<sub>2</sub>O. Thus, the predominant nitrate reduction pathway affects the fate of nitrate and may have major consequences for N-use efficiency in cropping systems and possibly also climate change.</p><p>In this commentary, we highlight challenges and key research questions that need to be addressed to be able to evaluate the promises of nitrate ammonification and the feasibility of exploiting this process in sustainable agriculture. These in","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135094454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}