首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment最新文献

英文 中文
A belowground perspective on the nexus between biodiversity change, climate change, and human well-being 从地下视角看待生物多样性变化、气候变化和人类福祉之间的关系
Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12108
Nico Eisenhauer, Karin Frank, Alexandra Weigelt, Bartosz Bartkowski, Rémy Beugnon, Katja Liebal, Miguel Mahecha, Martin Quaas, Djamil Al-Halbouni, Ana Bastos, Friedrich J. Bohn, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Joachim Denzler, Hannes Feilhauer, Rico Fischer, Immo Fritsche, Claudia Guimaraes-Steinicke, Martin Hänsel, Daniel B. M. Haun, Hartmut Herrmann, Andreas Huth, Heike Kalesse-Los, Michael Koetter, Nina Kolleck, Melanie Krause, Marlene Kretschmer, Pedro J. Leitão, Torsten Masson, Karin Mora, Birgit Müller, Jian Peng, Mira L. Pöhlker, Leonie Ratzke, Markus Reichstein, Solveig Richter, Nadja Rüger, Beatriz Sánchez-Parra, Maha Shadaydeh, Sebastian Sippel, Ina Tegen, Daniela Thrän, Josefine Umlauft, Manfred Wendisch, Kevin Wolf, Christian Wirth, Hannes Zacher, Sönke Zaehle, Johannes Quaas

Soil is central to the complex interplay among biodiversity, climate, and society. This paper examines the interconnectedness of soil biodiversity, climate change, and societal impacts, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated solutions. Human-induced biodiversity loss and climate change intensify environmental degradation, threatening human well-being. Soils, rich in biodiversity and vital for ecosystem function regulation, are highly vulnerable to these pressures, affecting nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and resilience. Soil also crucially regulates climate, influencing energy, water cycles, and carbon storage. Yet, climate change poses significant challenges to soil health and carbon dynamics, amplifying global warming. Integrated approaches are essential, including sustainable land management, policy interventions, technological innovations, and societal engagement. Practices like agroforestry and organic farming improve soil health and mitigate climate impacts. Effective policies and governance are crucial for promoting sustainable practices and soil conservation. Recent technologies aid in monitoring soil biodiversity and implementing sustainable land management. Societal engagement, through education and collective action, is vital for environmental stewardship. By prioritizing interdisciplinary research and addressing key frontiers, scientists can advance understanding of the soil biodiversity–climate change–society nexus, informing strategies for environmental sustainability and social equity.

土壤是生物多样性、气候和社会之间复杂相互作用的核心。本文探讨了土壤生物多样性、气候变化和社会影响之间的相互联系,强调迫切需要综合解决方案。人类造成的生物多样性丧失和气候变化加剧了环境退化,威胁着人类的福祉。土壤富含生物多样性,对生态系统功能的调节至关重要,极易受到这些压力的影响,进而影响养分循环、土壤肥力和恢复力。土壤还能调节气候,影响能量、水循环和碳储存。然而,气候变化给土壤健康和碳动态带来了巨大挑战,加剧了全球变暖。综合方法至关重要,包括可持续土地管理、政策干预、技术创新和社会参与。农林业和有机耕作等做法可以改善土壤健康,减轻对气候的影响。有效的政策和治理对于促进可持续实践和土壤保护至关重要。最新技术有助于监测土壤生物多样性和实施可持续土地管理。通过教育和集体行动实现社会参与对于环境管理至关重要。通过优先开展跨学科研究和解决关键前沿问题,科学家们可以促进对土壤生物多样性-气候变化-社会之间关系的理解,为环境可持续性和社会公平战略提供信息。
{"title":"A belowground perspective on the nexus between biodiversity change, climate change, and human well-being","authors":"Nico Eisenhauer,&nbsp;Karin Frank,&nbsp;Alexandra Weigelt,&nbsp;Bartosz Bartkowski,&nbsp;Rémy Beugnon,&nbsp;Katja Liebal,&nbsp;Miguel Mahecha,&nbsp;Martin Quaas,&nbsp;Djamil Al-Halbouni,&nbsp;Ana Bastos,&nbsp;Friedrich J. Bohn,&nbsp;Mariana Madruga de Brito,&nbsp;Joachim Denzler,&nbsp;Hannes Feilhauer,&nbsp;Rico Fischer,&nbsp;Immo Fritsche,&nbsp;Claudia Guimaraes-Steinicke,&nbsp;Martin Hänsel,&nbsp;Daniel B. M. Haun,&nbsp;Hartmut Herrmann,&nbsp;Andreas Huth,&nbsp;Heike Kalesse-Los,&nbsp;Michael Koetter,&nbsp;Nina Kolleck,&nbsp;Melanie Krause,&nbsp;Marlene Kretschmer,&nbsp;Pedro J. Leitão,&nbsp;Torsten Masson,&nbsp;Karin Mora,&nbsp;Birgit Müller,&nbsp;Jian Peng,&nbsp;Mira L. Pöhlker,&nbsp;Leonie Ratzke,&nbsp;Markus Reichstein,&nbsp;Solveig Richter,&nbsp;Nadja Rüger,&nbsp;Beatriz Sánchez-Parra,&nbsp;Maha Shadaydeh,&nbsp;Sebastian Sippel,&nbsp;Ina Tegen,&nbsp;Daniela Thrän,&nbsp;Josefine Umlauft,&nbsp;Manfred Wendisch,&nbsp;Kevin Wolf,&nbsp;Christian Wirth,&nbsp;Hannes Zacher,&nbsp;Sönke Zaehle,&nbsp;Johannes Quaas","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12108","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil is central to the complex interplay among biodiversity, climate, and society. This paper examines the interconnectedness of soil biodiversity, climate change, and societal impacts, emphasizing the urgent need for integrated solutions. Human-induced biodiversity loss and climate change intensify environmental degradation, threatening human well-being. Soils, rich in biodiversity and vital for ecosystem function regulation, are highly vulnerable to these pressures, affecting nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and resilience. Soil also crucially regulates climate, influencing energy, water cycles, and carbon storage. Yet, climate change poses significant challenges to soil health and carbon dynamics, amplifying global warming. Integrated approaches are essential, including sustainable land management, policy interventions, technological innovations, and societal engagement. Practices like agroforestry and organic farming improve soil health and mitigate climate impacts. Effective policies and governance are crucial for promoting sustainable practices and soil conservation. Recent technologies aid in monitoring soil biodiversity and implementing sustainable land management. Societal engagement, through education and collective action, is vital for environmental stewardship. By prioritizing interdisciplinary research and addressing key frontiers, scientists can advance understanding of the soil biodiversity–climate change–society nexus, informing strategies for environmental sustainability and social equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141304222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prof Diana Wall: A pioneering researcher and advocate of global soil biodiversity 戴安娜-沃尔教授全球土壤生物多样性的开拓性研究者和倡导者
Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12107
Brajesh K. Singh, Pankaj Trivedi, Eleonora Egidi, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo

Prof Diana H. Wall was a pioneering scientist, a trailblazer, a mentor for many, and the strongest advocate of soil biodiversity. Her research impacted many aspects of soil ecology, and she was best known for her work in Antarctic McMurdo Dry Valleys, soil invertebrates, ecosystem services and effects of climate change. Her research and advocacy had transformational impacts both on the fundamental understanding on distributions, functions they provide, and the need for assessment and conservation of soil biodiversity (van der Putten et al., 2023). Her tireless efforts and strongest possible advocacy of soil biodiversity was the foundation of changes we saw in recent years in global policies, including recently adopted agreement to include soil biodiversity in national biodiversity reporting at COP-15 of the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) in Montreal, Canada 2022 (The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 2022). Her scientific contributions have been recognised by many prestigious awards and fellowships including being elected as a member of the National Academy of Science and American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In recognition of her long-term contribution to Antarctic science, an upland Antarctic Valley—the Wall Valley—was named after her.

Soils are critical for supporting food security and climate change regulation. Up to 95% of our food come from soils (World Economic Forum, 2023). Sadly, one-third of these soils are already under some type of degradation. Further, soils provide habitats for 59% of global biodiversity (Anthony et al., 2023) that plays a fundamental role in regulating the function of terrestrial ecosystems, driving key processes such as carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and climate regulation (Delgado Baquerizo et al., 2020). However, this awareness was not always there, and soils and their biodiversity were poorly understood and largely underestimated. Diana was a pioneer in investigating and highlighting the fundamental importance of soil biodiversity. Her doctoral thesis on soil nematodes and her novel work describing the soil biodiversity of extreme deserts from Antarctica opened the door to researchers across the globe to investigate and learn more about soil organisms and their role to support ecosystem functions.

Diana was well known for her many leadership activities and has inspired many across the globe. Her research career started with a PhD at the University of Kentucky in 1971, she then moved to the University of California-Riverside. In 1993, she moved to Colorado State University and worked there in various capacities, including a key role in establishing and leading the School of Global Environmental Sustainability. In her strong commitment to support soil biodiversity research and conservation, Diana led and supported many initiatives that have spawned broad engagement and innovation in the field of

我们所有人都有责任在此基础上,继续倡导重视、评估和保护土壤生物多样性。这将是我们对戴安娜一生的真正纪念。
{"title":"Prof Diana Wall: A pioneering researcher and advocate of global soil biodiversity","authors":"Brajesh K. Singh,&nbsp;Pankaj Trivedi,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12107","url":null,"abstract":"<p></p><p>Prof Diana H. Wall was a pioneering scientist, a trailblazer, a mentor for many, and the strongest advocate of soil biodiversity. Her research impacted many aspects of soil ecology, and she was best known for her work in Antarctic McMurdo Dry Valleys, soil invertebrates, ecosystem services and effects of climate change. Her research and advocacy had transformational impacts both on the fundamental understanding on distributions, functions they provide, and the need for assessment and conservation of soil biodiversity (van der Putten et al., <span>2023</span>). Her tireless efforts and strongest possible advocacy of soil biodiversity was the foundation of changes we saw in recent years in global policies, including recently adopted agreement to include soil biodiversity in national biodiversity reporting at COP-15 of the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) in Montreal, Canada 2022 (The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, <span>2022</span>). Her scientific contributions have been recognised by many prestigious awards and fellowships including being elected as a member of the National Academy of Science and American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In recognition of her long-term contribution to Antarctic science, an upland Antarctic Valley—the Wall Valley—was named after her.</p><p>Soils are critical for supporting food security and climate change regulation. Up to 95% of our food come from soils (World Economic Forum, <span>2023</span>). Sadly, one-third of these soils are already under some type of degradation. Further, soils provide habitats for 59% of global biodiversity (Anthony et al., <span>2023</span>) that plays a fundamental role in regulating the function of terrestrial ecosystems, driving key processes such as carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling and climate regulation (Delgado Baquerizo et al., <span>2020</span>). However, this awareness was not always there, and soils and their biodiversity were poorly understood and largely underestimated. Diana was a pioneer in investigating and highlighting the fundamental importance of soil biodiversity. Her doctoral thesis on soil nematodes and her novel work describing the soil biodiversity of extreme deserts from Antarctica opened the door to researchers across the globe to investigate and learn more about soil organisms and their role to support ecosystem functions.</p><p>Diana was well known for her many leadership activities and has inspired many across the globe. Her research career started with a PhD at the University of Kentucky in 1971, she then moved to the University of California-Riverside. In 1993, she moved to Colorado State University and worked there in various capacities, including a key role in establishing and leading the School of Global Environmental Sustainability. In her strong commitment to support soil biodiversity research and conservation, Diana led and supported many initiatives that have spawned broad engagement and innovation in the field of","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12107","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141245942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization and their corresponding monetary values under long-term integrated soil fertility management practices 长期土壤肥力综合管理措施下的氮磷矿化度及其相应的货币价值
Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12100
Peter Bolo, Monicah Mucheru-Muna, Michael Kinyua, George Ayaga, Sylvia Nyawira, Job Kihara

Introduction

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are essential nutrients for plant growth, commonly supplied through costly inorganic amendments. However, despite the benefits of nutrient mineralisation, there is limited quantitative information on its monetary value, and the extent of associated potential financial relief to smallholder farmers, particularly in western Kenya region.

Materials and Methods

This study used in situ resin core method to explore the extent of N and P nutrient mineralisation and monetary equivalents under select integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) practices in two long-term (17 years) trials namely Conservation Tillage (CT1) and Integrated Nutrient Management (INM3).

Results

FYM addition increased various soil chemical parameters while sole fertiliser (NPK) reduced soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC). Phosphorus application was associated with increased P availabillity and its monetary value within the first month (0.29 kg P ha−1; USD 1.13 ha−1) and second month (1.22 kg P ha−1; USD 4.76 ha−1) of incubation. The quantities of N mineralised, and their monetary equivalents varied with fertiliser application and incubation times. Nitrogen fertilisation depressed P mineralisation and monetary benefits. FYM application increased P mineralisation and its monetary value within 30 (0.78 kg ha−1; ~USD 3.02 ha−1) and 60 (1.22 kg ha−1; ~USD 4.76) days of incubation. Residue application increased mineralised N (17.48 kg ha−1; ~USD 22.79 ha−1) after 60 days. Maize and soybean intercropping increased N mineralisation (45.81 kg N ha−1) and monetary value (USD 59.76 ha−1). SOC and other soil variables, their stoichiometry ratios and N mineralisation were significantly correlated. Combined NPK and FYM application significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased maize yields and grain prices.

Conclusion

These findings reflect potential nutrient-based economic advantages of ISFM practices to resource-limited smallholder farmers. Combined application of NPK fertiliser and FYM is integral in not only optimising crop yields, but also driving key soil health-related parameters and economic benefits.

引言 氮(N)和磷(P)是植物生长所必需的养分,通常通过昂贵的无机添加剂提供。然而,尽管养分矿化具有诸多益处,但有关其货币价值以及对小农(尤其是肯尼亚西部地区的小农)的相关潜在经济救济程度的定量信息却十分有限。 材料与方法 本研究采用原位树脂核心法,在两项长期(17 年)试验(即保护性耕作(CT1)和养分综合管理(INM3))中,探讨了在选定的土壤肥力综合管理(ISFM)实践下氮、磷养分矿化程度和货币等值。 结果 添加 FYM 增加了各种土壤化学参数,而单一肥料(氮磷钾)则降低了土壤 pH 值和土壤有机碳 (SOC)。在培育的第一个月(0.29 千克磷/公顷-1;1.13 美元/公顷-1)和第二个月(1.22 千克磷/公顷-1;4.76 美元/公顷-1),磷的施用量增加了,其货币价值也增加了。氮的矿化量及其货币等价物随施肥量和培育时间的不同而变化。氮肥的施用抑制了磷矿化和货币收益。在孵化 30 天(0.78 千克/公顷-1;约合 3.02 美元/公顷-1)和 60 天(1.22 千克/公顷-1;约合 4.76 美元)内,施用冻土提高了 P 矿化度及其货币价值。60 天后,施用残留物增加了矿化氮(17.48 千克/公顷-1;约合 22.79 美元/公顷-1)。玉米和大豆间作提高了氮的矿化度(45.81 千克氮/公顷-1)和货币价值(59.76 美元/公顷-1)。SOC 与其他土壤变量、它们的化学计量比和氮矿化度有显著相关性。联合施用氮磷钾和冻土显著提高了玉米产量和谷物价格(p ≤ 0.05)。 结论 这些发现反映出 ISFM 方法对资源有限的小农具有基于养分的潜在经济优势。结合施用氮磷钾化肥和堆肥不仅能优化作物产量,还能提高与土壤健康相关的关键参数和经济效益。
{"title":"Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization and their corresponding monetary values under long-term integrated soil fertility management practices","authors":"Peter Bolo,&nbsp;Monicah Mucheru-Muna,&nbsp;Michael Kinyua,&nbsp;George Ayaga,&nbsp;Sylvia Nyawira,&nbsp;Job Kihara","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12100","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are essential nutrients for plant growth, commonly supplied through costly inorganic amendments. However, despite the benefits of nutrient mineralisation, there is limited quantitative information on its monetary value, and the extent of associated potential financial relief to smallholder farmers, particularly in western Kenya region.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study used in situ resin core method to explore the extent of N and P nutrient mineralisation and monetary equivalents under select integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) practices in two long-term (17 years) trials namely Conservation Tillage (CT1) and Integrated Nutrient Management (INM3).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>FYM addition increased various soil chemical parameters while sole fertiliser (NPK) reduced soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC). Phosphorus application was associated with increased P availabillity and its monetary value within the first month (0.29 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup>; USD 1.13 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and second month (1.22 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup>; USD 4.76 ha<sup>−1</sup>) of incubation. The quantities of N mineralised, and their monetary equivalents varied with fertiliser application and incubation times. Nitrogen fertilisation depressed P mineralisation and monetary benefits. FYM application increased P mineralisation and its monetary value within 30 (0.78 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>; ~USD 3.02 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and 60 (1.22 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>; ~USD 4.76) days of incubation. Residue application increased mineralised N (17.48 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>; ~USD 22.79 ha<sup>−1</sup>) after 60 days. Maize and soybean intercropping increased N mineralisation (45.81 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) and monetary value (USD 59.76 ha<sup>−1</sup>). SOC and other soil variables, their stoichiometry ratios and N mineralisation were significantly correlated. Combined NPK and FYM application significantly (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) increased maize yields and grain prices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These findings reflect potential nutrient-based economic advantages of ISFM practices to resource-limited smallholder farmers. Combined application of NPK fertiliser and FYM is integral in not only optimising crop yields, but also driving key soil health-related parameters and economic benefits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140919245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Viticulture and the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): Historical overview, current situation and future perspective 葡萄栽培与欧盟共同农业政策(CAP):历史回顾、现状与未来展望
Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12099
Pablo Homet, Manuel Ángel Gallardo-Reina, Juan F. Aguiar, Isabel M. Liberal, Ramón Casimiro-Soriguer, Raúl Ochoa-Hueso

The grapevine is one of the most important perennial fruit crops worldwide. The historical stability of winegrowing methods has spanned almost 3000 years since the introduction of viticulture in Europe. However, in the last 70 years, the wine sector in the Europe has experienced substantial transformations. These changes are attributed to the widespread adoption of mechanisation and industralisation in the 1950s and the establishment of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The growing concern for the environment and climate change in the European Union (EU) has significantly influenced the successive reforms of the CAP. These reforms have resulted in the acquisition of new commitments to protect the environment, mitigate climate change and reduce biodiversity loss over the years. In this work, we carried out a critical analysis of the most relevant aspects of the new CAP and address the regulatory framework of organic agriculture in the EU as a tool for improving the sustainability of vineyards. Currently, Spain is the country with the largest vineyard area in the world, reaching 964,000 hectares. This represents 13% of the world's vineyards and 30% in the EU, which demonstrates the importance of this crop in Europe. Due to its relevance, we focused our critical analyses of the new CAP on Spain as a case study. The latest reform of the CAP, applicable for the period 2023-2027, is the most ambitious in environmental terms and includes instruments such as reinforced conditionality, eco-schemes and payments for agri-environment–climate commitments. Finally, we propose that by integrating concepts and management strategies from current organic and regenerative viticulture together with historical strategies derived from treatises and classic authors across a wide range of societies and cultures, the goals of the new CAP can be successfully met. This will contribute to reuniting the past, the present and the future of viticulture for a more nature-based winemaking.

葡萄是世界上最重要的多年生水果作物之一。自葡萄栽培引入欧洲以来,葡萄种植方法的历史稳定性已持续了近 3000 年。然而,在过去的 70 年中,欧洲的葡萄酒行业经历了巨大的变革。这些变化归因于 20 世纪 50 年代机械化和工业化的广泛应用,以及共同农业政策(CAP)的确立。欧盟(EU)对环境和气候变化的日益关注极大地影响了共同农业政策的历次改革。多年来,这些改革促使欧盟在保护环境、减缓气候变化和减少生物多样性损失方面做出了新的承诺。在这项工作中,我们对新的 CAP 最相关的方面进行了批判性分析,并探讨了欧盟的有机农业监管框架,将其作为改善葡萄园可持续性的工具。目前,西班牙是世界上葡萄园面积最大的国家,达到 964,000 公顷。这占世界葡萄园面积的 13%,占欧盟葡萄园面积的 30%,表明了这种作物在欧洲的重要性。鉴于其重要性,我们以西班牙为例,对新的 CAP 进行了批判性分析。适用于 2023-2027 年的最新 CAP 改革在环境方面是最雄心勃勃的,包括强化条件、生态计划和农业环境-气候承诺付款等手段。最后,我们建议,通过将当前有机葡萄栽培和再生葡萄栽培的理念和管理策略与来自不同社会和文化的论文和经典作家的历史策略相结合,新 CAP 的目标可以成功实现。这将有助于将葡萄栽培的过去、现在和未来结合起来,实现更加以自然为基础的葡萄酒酿造。
{"title":"Viticulture and the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): Historical overview, current situation and future perspective","authors":"Pablo Homet,&nbsp;Manuel Ángel Gallardo-Reina,&nbsp;Juan F. Aguiar,&nbsp;Isabel M. Liberal,&nbsp;Ramón Casimiro-Soriguer,&nbsp;Raúl Ochoa-Hueso","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12099","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The grapevine is one of the most important perennial fruit crops worldwide. The historical stability of winegrowing methods has spanned almost 3000 years since the introduction of viticulture in Europe. However, in the last 70 years, the wine sector in the Europe has experienced substantial transformations. These changes are attributed to the widespread adoption of mechanisation and industralisation in the 1950s and the establishment of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The growing concern for the environment and climate change in the European Union (EU) has significantly influenced the successive reforms of the CAP. These reforms have resulted in the acquisition of new commitments to protect the environment, mitigate climate change and reduce biodiversity loss over the years. In this work, we carried out a critical analysis of the most relevant aspects of the new CAP and address the regulatory framework of organic agriculture in the EU as a tool for improving the sustainability of vineyards. Currently, Spain is the country with the largest vineyard area in the world, reaching 964,000 hectares. This represents 13% of the world's vineyards and 30% in the EU, which demonstrates the importance of this crop in Europe. Due to its relevance, we focused our critical analyses of the new CAP on Spain as a case study. The latest reform of the CAP, applicable for the period 2023-2027, is the most ambitious in environmental terms and includes instruments such as reinforced conditionality, eco-schemes and payments for agri-environment–climate commitments. Finally, we propose that by integrating concepts and management strategies from current organic and regenerative viticulture together with historical strategies derived from treatises and classic authors across a wide range of societies and cultures, the goals of the new CAP can be successfully met. This will contribute to reuniting the past, the present and the future of viticulture for a more nature-based winemaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140633722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effects of pastoral hill country natural landscape features and land management practices on nitrate losses and its potential attenuation for improved water quality 山地田园自然景观特征和土地管理方法对硝酸盐流失的影响及其为改善水质而进行衰减的潜力
Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12096
Grace Chibuike, Ranvir Singh, Lucy Burkitt

Pastoral farming on hill country landscapes influences nitrogen (N) dynamics and its losses to freshwater. This study reviewed the current literature identifying key effects of pastoral hill country landscape features and land management practices on nitrate losses to receiving waters. The review also highlighted the potential effects of inherent landscape features on nitrate attenuation pathways for better water quality outcomes. Intensive land use activities involving high rates of fertiliser application, higher stocking rates and cattle grazing, relative to sheep grazing, are more likely to increase nitrate loss, especially on lower slopes. However, soils with a high carbon (C) storage capacity such as allophanic soils potentially limit nitrate loss via denitrification in subsoil layers. Hill country seepage wetlands also offer an opportunity to attenuate nitrate loss, though their efficacy is largely impacted by hydrological variations in their inflows and outflows. By enhancing the natural nitrate attenuation capacity of seepage wetlands, mapping and strategic use of high subsoil denitrification potential, effective riparian management, efficient fertiliser and grazing practices and the incorporation of these farm management strategies into Freshwater Farm Plans (FWFPs), wider environmental and farm productivity/profitability goals, including improved water quality, would be achieved on pastoral hill country landscapes.

丘陵地带的畜牧业影响着氮(N)的动态变化及其向淡水的流失。本研究审查了当前的文献,确定了山地牧场景观特征和土地管理方法对硝酸盐流失到受纳水体的主要影响。综述还强调了固有景观特征对硝酸盐衰减途径的潜在影响,以达到更好的水质效果。相对于放牧绵羊而言,涉及高施肥量、高放牧率和放牧牛群的密集型土地使用活动更有可能增加硝酸盐的流失,尤其是在较低的斜坡上。不过,碳 (C) 储存能力高的土壤(如异钙土壤)可能会通过底土层的反硝化作用限制硝酸盐的流失。山地渗流湿地也为减少硝酸盐流失提供了机会,但其功效在很大程度上受到流入和流出的水文变化的影响。通过提高渗流湿地的自然硝酸盐衰减能力、绘制底土高脱硝潜力图并加以战略性利用、有效的河岸管理、高效的施肥和放牧方法以及将这些农场管理战略纳入淡水农场计划(FWFPs),可在山地牧区实现更广泛的环境和农场生产力/盈利性目标,包括改善水质。
{"title":"The effects of pastoral hill country natural landscape features and land management practices on nitrate losses and its potential attenuation for improved water quality","authors":"Grace Chibuike,&nbsp;Ranvir Singh,&nbsp;Lucy Burkitt","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12096","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pastoral farming on hill country landscapes influences nitrogen (N) dynamics and its losses to freshwater. This study reviewed the current literature identifying key effects of pastoral hill country landscape features and land management practices on nitrate losses to receiving waters. The review also highlighted the potential effects of inherent landscape features on nitrate attenuation pathways for better water quality outcomes. Intensive land use activities involving high rates of fertiliser application, higher stocking rates and cattle grazing, relative to sheep grazing, are more likely to increase nitrate loss, especially on lower slopes. However, soils with a high carbon (C) storage capacity such as allophanic soils potentially limit nitrate loss via denitrification in subsoil layers. Hill country seepage wetlands also offer an opportunity to attenuate nitrate loss, though their efficacy is largely impacted by hydrological variations in their inflows and outflows. By enhancing the natural nitrate attenuation capacity of seepage wetlands, mapping and strategic use of high subsoil denitrification potential, effective riparian management, efficient fertiliser and grazing practices and the incorporation of these farm management strategies into Freshwater Farm Plans (FWFPs), wider environmental and farm productivity/profitability goals, including improved water quality, would be achieved on pastoral hill country landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12096","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140192135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ESMAX for spatial agroecology: A conceptual spatial model for the quantification and visualisation of ES performance from different configurations of landscape 空间生态农业 ESMAX:用于量化和可视化不同景观配置的 ES 性能的概念性空间模型
Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12097
Richard Morris, Shannon Davis, Gwen-Aëlle Grelet, Pablo Gregorini

Introduction

Agriculture is confronted by the dual challenges of increasing global demand for food production while reducing negative impacts on the environment. One suggested solution is transitioning modern industrial agriculture to more agroecologically-informed practices, thus realigning increased food production with the carrying capacity of Earth Systems. The transition to multifunctional agroecological systems, that promote the production of multiple ecosystem services (ES) as well as food production, requires an adaptive management process that addresses climate-change, market complexity, practical implementation and knowledge transfer.

Materials & Methods

This work proposes a spatially explicit methodology to support this process. Spatial agroecology, in this context, combines a new Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based model (ESMAX) with development of a ‘solution space’ to assist stakeholders identify configurations of agroecological components (in this case, trees on farm) at the scale of a 1 ha paddock to supply a targeted range of regulating ES (cooling effect, flood mitigation and habitat). ESMAX uses distance-decay characteristics specific to each type of regulating ES to quantify and visualise the influence of spatial configuration of ES-supplying tree clumps on overall ES performance.

Results

The results from this application of spatial agroecology suggest regulating ES production at farm and paddock scale is influenced by the arrangement of trees on farm. ESMAX's results show paddocks with large tree clumps return the best cooling effect, while small clumps deliver the best flood mitigation and most suitable habitat. Evenly dispersed arrangements of small tree clumps provide the best multifunctional performance across all three ES modelled in this work.

Conclusion

Designed spatial agroecological interventions can affect landscape multifunctionality at paddock scale, where practical decisions are made and implemented. This provides spatially explicit support of an adaptive management process. Utilising agroecological systems as spatial mechanisms for supplying critical regulating ES also highlights a new function for agriculture in the Anthropocene epoch.

导言 农业面临着双重挑战,既要增加全球粮食生产需求,又要减少对环境的负面影响。建议的解决方案之一是将现代工业化农业过渡到更加注重农业生态的做法,从而使粮食增产与地球系统的承载能力保持一致。向多功能生态农业系统过渡,促进多种生态系统服务 (ES) 的生产以及粮食生产,需要一个适应性管理过程,以应对气候变化、市场复杂性、实际实施和知识转让。 材料与amp; 方法 这项工作提出了一种空间明确的方法来支持这一过程。在此背景下,空间生态农业将基于地理信息系统(GIS)的新模型(ESMAX)与 "解决方案空间 "的开发相结合,以帮助利益相关者确定 1 公顷围场范围内的生态农业成分(在本例中为农场中的树木)配置,从而提供一系列有针对性的调节性生态系统服务(冷却效果、洪水缓解和栖息地)。ESMAX 利用每种调节性生态系统特有的距离衰减特性,量化和可视化提供生态系统的树丛的空间配置对整体生态系统性能的影响。 结果 空间生态农业的这一应用结果表明,农场和围场规模的 ES 生产受农场树木布局的影响。ESMAX 的结果表明,有大树丛的围场冷却效果最佳,而小树丛则能提供最佳的洪水缓解效果和最合适的栖息地。在这项工作中模拟的所有三种 ES 中,均匀分布的小树群具有最佳的多功能性能。 结论 经过设计的空间农业生态干预措施可在围场范围内影响景观的多功能性,并在此范围内做出并实施切实可行的决策。这为适应性管理过程提供了明确的空间支持。利用生态农业系统作为提供关键调节性生态系统服务的空间机制,还凸显了农业在人类纪元的新功能。
{"title":"ESMAX for spatial agroecology: A conceptual spatial model for the quantification and visualisation of ES performance from different configurations of landscape","authors":"Richard Morris,&nbsp;Shannon Davis,&nbsp;Gwen-Aëlle Grelet,&nbsp;Pablo Gregorini","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12097","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Agriculture is confronted by the dual challenges of increasing global demand for food production while reducing negative impacts on the environment. One suggested solution is transitioning modern industrial agriculture to more agroecologically-informed practices, thus realigning increased food production with the carrying capacity of Earth Systems. The transition to multifunctional agroecological systems, that promote the production of multiple ecosystem services (ES) as well as food production, requires an adaptive management process that addresses climate-change, market complexity, practical implementation and knowledge transfer.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials &amp; Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This work proposes a spatially explicit methodology to support this process. Spatial agroecology, in this context, combines a new Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based model (ESMAX) with development of a ‘solution space’ to assist stakeholders identify configurations of agroecological components (in this case, trees on farm) at the scale of a 1 ha paddock to supply a targeted range of regulating ES (cooling effect, flood mitigation and habitat). ESMAX uses distance-decay characteristics specific to each type of regulating ES to quantify and visualise the influence of spatial configuration of ES-supplying tree clumps on overall ES performance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The results from this application of spatial agroecology suggest regulating ES production at farm and paddock scale is influenced by the arrangement of trees on farm. ESMAX's results show paddocks with large tree clumps return the best cooling effect, while small clumps deliver the best flood mitigation and most suitable habitat. Evenly dispersed arrangements of small tree clumps provide the best multifunctional performance across all three ES modelled in this work.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Designed spatial agroecological interventions can affect landscape multifunctionality at paddock scale, where practical decisions are made and implemented. This provides spatially explicit support of an adaptive management process. Utilising agroecological systems as spatial mechanisms for supplying critical regulating ES also highlights a new function for agriculture in the Anthropocene epoch.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140123684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genotype × environment interaction and selection parameters for high yielding wheat genotypes under irrigated and heat stress environment 灌溉和热胁迫环境下小麦高产基因型与环境的相互作用及选择参数
Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12098
Radhakrishna Bhandari, Mukti R. Poudel

Introduction

Wheat is a significant contributor to the food and nutritional security of the world. Due to climatic constraints and heat stress condition, the potentiality of wheat to eradicate existing hunger and malnutrition has been severely limited all around the world.

Materials and Methods

To evaluate the performance and stability of elite wheat genotype under irrigated and heat stress environment, a field experiment was conducted during the wheat growing season of 2020, 2021 and 2022 under irrigated and heat stress environment that altogether created six distinct wheat growing environments.

Results

The combined ANOVA revealed that all quantitative traits studied were significantly influenced by heat stress environments (p < 0.01). Which Won Where (WWW) model revealed, Bhairahawa lines (BL) 4407, Nepal lines (NL) 1384 and NL 1346 performed best under irrigated environments of 2020, 2021 and 2022 while BL 4407, NL 1384 and NL 1381 performed best under heat stress environment of 2020, 2021 and 2022. WWW model showed, NL 1369, NL 1386 and NL 1376 as the most stable genotypes across irrigated and heat stress environment. The phenotypic correlation, path analysis, network diagram, cluster analysis and cluster based principal component analysis analysis revealed traits, days to booting (DTB), plant height (Ph), spike length (SL), ten spike weight (TSW) and thousand kernel weight (TKW) are most closely associated with grain yield of wheat.

Conclusion

High yielding genotypes should be selected based on earliness in DTB, longer Ph, SL and higher TSW and TKW under both environments. Breeding for taller genotypes should specifically be focused to obtain high yielding genotypes under heat stress environments.

引言 小麦是世界粮食和营养安全的重要贡献者。由于气候限制和热胁迫条件,小麦在消除世界各地现有饥饿和营养不良现象方面的潜力受到严重限制。 材料与方法 为了评估小麦精英基因型在灌溉和热胁迫环境下的表现和稳定性,在 2020 年、2021 年和 2022 年小麦生长季节,在灌溉和热胁迫环境下进行了田间试验,共创造了 6 种不同的小麦生长环境。 结果 综合方差分析显示,所有研究的数量性状都受到热胁迫环境的显著影响(p < 0.01)。WWW模型显示,Bhairahawa品系(BL)4407、尼泊尔品系(NL)1384和NL 1346在2020年、2021年和2022年灌溉环境下表现最好,而BL 4407、NL 1384和NL 1381在2020年、2021年和2022年热胁迫环境下表现最好。WWW 模型显示,NL 1369、NL 1386 和 NL 1376 是灌溉和热胁迫环境下最稳定的基因型。表型相关性、路径分析、网络图、聚类分析和基于聚类的主成分分析表明,小麦的出苗天数(DTB)、株高(Ph)、穗长(SL)、十穗重(TSW)和千粒重(TKW)等性状与粮食产量的关系最为密切。 结论 在两种环境下,都应根据 DTB 的早熟性、较长的 Ph、SL 以及较高的 TSW 和 TKW 来选择高产基因型。在热胁迫环境下,应特别注重培育较高的基因型,以获得高产基因型。
{"title":"Genotype × environment interaction and selection parameters for high yielding wheat genotypes under irrigated and heat stress environment","authors":"Radhakrishna Bhandari,&nbsp;Mukti R. Poudel","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12098","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Wheat is a significant contributor to the food and nutritional security of the world. Due to climatic constraints and heat stress condition, the potentiality of wheat to eradicate existing hunger and malnutrition has been severely limited all around the world.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the performance and stability of elite wheat genotype under irrigated and heat stress environment, a field experiment was conducted during the wheat growing season of 2020, 2021 and 2022 under irrigated and heat stress environment that altogether created six distinct wheat growing environments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The combined ANOVA revealed that all quantitative traits studied were significantly influenced by heat stress environments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Which Won Where (WWW) model revealed, Bhairahawa lines (BL) 4407, Nepal lines (NL) 1384 and NL 1346 performed best under irrigated environments of 2020, 2021 and 2022 while BL 4407, NL 1384 and NL 1381 performed best under heat stress environment of 2020, 2021 and 2022. WWW model showed, NL 1369, NL 1386 and NL 1376 as the most stable genotypes across irrigated and heat stress environment. The phenotypic correlation, path analysis, network diagram, cluster analysis and cluster based principal component analysis analysis revealed traits, days to booting (DTB), plant height (Ph), spike length (SL), ten spike weight (TSW) and thousand kernel weight (TKW) are most closely associated with grain yield of wheat.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>High yielding genotypes should be selected based on earliness in DTB, longer Ph, SL and higher TSW and TKW under both environments. Breeding for taller genotypes should specifically be focused to obtain high yielding genotypes under heat stress environments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140114228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of native rhizobacteria co-inoculation and formulation of bacterial inoculants on the growth and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) 本地根瘤菌共同接种和细菌接种剂配方对蚕豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)生长和产量的影响
Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12095
Hezekiah Korir, Nancy W. Mungai, Victor W. Wasike

Introduction

Incorporation of inoculum in different carrier materials may increase the efficacy of bacterial inocula.

Materials and Methods

Field experiments were conducted using two strains of rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and their respective combinations using different carrier materials in common bean-growing regions in three soil types in Kenya. The field experiment was laid out in a split-plot arrangement with the strain inoculations as the main plot while the subplots consisted of the carrier materials (filter mud, peat moss and yeast extract mannitol broth [YEMB]). Each main plot included two controls: uninoculated negative control and uninoculated controls that received N and P fertilizer. The experiment was conducted for two cropping seasons. Data were collected on the nodulation, shoot and root biomass and yield.

Results

Co-inoculation of the common bean with Rhizobium phaseoli + Bacillus aryabhattai strains had significantly higher number of nodules (55 nodules per plant) compared to single R. phaseoli inoculation (38 nodules). The co-inoculation of the rhizobia and the PSB yielded statistically at par with the application of diammonium phosphate (18:46:0) across the soil types and seasons. The use of filter mud as a carrier material led to a higher number of nodules for most of the rhizobia strains inoculation and their respective co-inoculation with the bacillus strains. Significantly higher yield was obtained with the filter mud (1.64 Mg ha−1) while there was no significant difference in the yield of common bean between peat moss and YEMB as carrier materials for the bacterial strains.

Conclusion

The solid carrier material, specifically filter mud, showed potential for use in the formulation of inoculants. Specific co-inoculation of rhizobia (R. phaseoli and Rhizobium pusense strains) and PSB (Paenibacillus polymyxa and B. aryabhattai) increased the growth, nodulation and yield of common bean more efficiently than the control.

引言 在不同的载体材料中加入接种体可以提高细菌接种的功效。 材料与方法 在肯尼亚常见的豆类种植区的三种土壤类型中,使用两种根瘤菌和磷酸盐溶解菌(PSB)菌株及其各自的组合,并使用不同的载体材料进行了田间试验。田间试验采用分小区安排,以菌株接种为主小区,子小区由载体材料(滤泥、泥炭藓和酵母提取甘露醇肉汤 [YEMB])组成。每个主小区包括两个对照:未接种的阴性对照和未接种但施用氮肥和磷肥的对照。实验进行了两季。收集的数据包括拔节率、芽和根的生物量以及产量。 结果 相叶根瘤菌 + aryabhattai 杆菌菌株共同接种蚕豆,与单株接种相叶根瘤菌(38 个瘤)相比,蚕豆的瘤数(每株 55 个瘤)显著增加。在不同的土壤类型和季节,根瘤菌和 PSB 的联合接种与施用磷酸二铵(18:46:0)的统计产量相当。使用滤泥作为载体材料,大多数根瘤菌株接种和与芽孢杆菌株联合接种的结节数量都更多。滤泥的产量明显更高(1.64 Mg ha-1),而泥炭藓和 YEMB 作为细菌菌株的载体材料,在蚕豆产量上没有明显差异。 结论 固体载体材料,特别是滤泥,显示出用于配制接种剂的潜力。与对照相比,特定的根瘤菌(R. phaseoli 和 Rhizobium pusense 菌株)和 PSB(Paenibacillus polymyxa 和 B. aryabhattai)共同接种能更有效地提高蚕豆的生长、拔节和产量。
{"title":"Influence of native rhizobacteria co-inoculation and formulation of bacterial inoculants on the growth and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)","authors":"Hezekiah Korir,&nbsp;Nancy W. Mungai,&nbsp;Victor W. Wasike","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12095","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Incorporation of inoculum in different carrier materials may increase the efficacy of bacterial inocula.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Field experiments were conducted using two strains of rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and their respective combinations using different carrier materials in common bean-growing regions in three soil types in Kenya. The field experiment was laid out in a split-plot arrangement with the strain inoculations as the main plot while the subplots consisted of the carrier materials (filter mud, peat moss and yeast extract mannitol broth [YEMB]). Each main plot included two controls: uninoculated negative control and uninoculated controls that received N and P fertilizer. The experiment was conducted for two cropping seasons. Data were collected on the nodulation, shoot and root biomass and yield.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Co-inoculation of the common bean with <i>Rhizobium phaseoli</i> + <i>Bacillus aryabhattai</i> strains had significantly higher number of nodules (55 nodules per plant) compared to single <i>R. phaseoli</i> inoculation (38 nodules). The co-inoculation of the rhizobia and the PSB yielded statistically at par with the application of diammonium phosphate (18:46:0) across the soil types and seasons. The use of filter mud as a carrier material led to a higher number of nodules for most of the rhizobia strains inoculation and their respective co-inoculation with the bacillus strains. Significantly higher yield was obtained with the filter mud (1.64 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) while there was no significant difference in the yield of common bean between peat moss and YEMB as carrier materials for the bacterial strains.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The solid carrier material, specifically filter mud, showed potential for use in the formulation of inoculants. Specific co-inoculation of rhizobia (<i>R. phaseoli</i> and <i>Rhizobium pusense</i> strains) and PSB (<i>Paenibacillus polymyxa</i> and <i>B. aryabhattai</i>) increased the growth, nodulation and yield of common bean more efficiently than the control.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12095","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139976545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impacts of biostimulants on crop yield and biological activity under drought conditions 干旱条件下生物刺激素对作物产量和生物活性的影响
Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12093
Jenendra Wadduwage, Eleonora Egidi, Brajesh K. Singh, Catriona A. Macdonald

Introduction

Biostimulants are proposed to have a role in sustainable food production and are being increasingly used strategies to limit the negative effects of drought stress on crop yield and soil health. However, how different biostimulants used alone, or in combination with conventional management approaches affect soil health and crop yield under drought in different soils is not well understood. Here we conducted a glasshouse experiment to investigate this.

Materials and Methods

Two soil types from fields maintained under intensive (IM) and extensive (EM) management practices were used with two commercial biostimulants [Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP)] on soil microbial populations and crop yield (lettuce) under well-watered and drought stressed conditions. We examined the activity and biomass of soil microorganisms as well as seed germination and root and shoot biomass to examine the effect of application of biostimulants on parameters of soil health and crop yield.

Results

Biostimulants generally increased crop yield, basal soil respiration and microbial biomass, with effects stronger in EM soils than in IM soils, but effects on soil enzyme activities were variable. The combined use of biostimulant and inorganic fertiliser negated the benefits of the biostimulant on soil biological properties in some cases. Nevertheless, effects of biostimulants had a positive impact on crop yield with the combined use of soil-applied and seed applied biostimulants have the greatest impact on plant biomass and also conferring some resistance in both soil microbial communities and plant growth to drought.

Conclusions

While biomass and activity of the microbial community and plant growth responses to biostimulant additions are both soil and biostimulant dependent, their combined use has potential to aid both plants and maintain promote microbial activity under of drought, compared to conventional fertiliser treatments in extensively managed soils.

引言 生物刺激素被认为可在可持续粮食生产中发挥作用,并被越来越多地用于限制干旱胁迫对作物产量和土壤健康的负面影响。然而,人们对不同生物刺激剂单独使用或与传统管理方法结合使用如何影响不同土壤中的土壤健康和作物产量还不甚了解。在此,我们进行了一项温室实验来研究这一问题。 材料与方法 两种土壤类型分别来自采用密集型(IM)和广泛型(EM)管理方法的田地,在浇水充足和干旱胁迫条件下,两种商业生物刺激剂(通用天然植物食品(UNP)和 Converte Seed Primer(CSP))对土壤微生物种群和作物产量(莴苣)产生了影响。我们检测了土壤微生物的活性和生物量以及种子发芽率、根和芽的生物量,以研究施用生物刺激剂对土壤健康参数和作物产量的影响。 结果 生物刺激素普遍提高了作物产量、土壤基础呼吸作用和微生物生物量,在 EM 土壤中的效果强于 IM 土壤,但对土壤酶活性的影响则不尽相同。在某些情况下,生物刺激剂和无机肥料的联合使用抵消了生物刺激剂对土壤生物特性的益处。不过,生物刺激剂对作物产量有积极影响,土壤施用生物刺激剂和种子施用生物刺激剂的联合使用对植物生物量的影响最大,还能使土壤微生物群落和植物生长对干旱产生一定的抵抗力。 结论 虽然微生物群落的生物量和活性以及植物生长对添加生物刺激剂的反应都取决于土壤和生物刺激剂,但在广泛管理的土壤中,与传统肥料处理相比,联合使用生物刺激剂有可能在干旱条件下帮助植物和维持促进微生物的活性。
{"title":"Impacts of biostimulants on crop yield and biological activity under drought conditions","authors":"Jenendra Wadduwage,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12093","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Biostimulants are proposed to have a role in sustainable food production and are being increasingly used strategies to limit the negative effects of drought stress on crop yield and soil health. However, how different biostimulants used alone, or in combination with conventional management approaches affect soil health and crop yield under drought in different soils is not well understood. Here we conducted a glasshouse experiment to investigate this.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Two soil types from fields maintained under intensive (IM) and extensive (EM) management practices were used with two commercial biostimulants [Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP)] on soil microbial populations and crop yield (lettuce) under well-watered and drought stressed conditions. We examined the activity and biomass of soil microorganisms as well as seed germination and root and shoot biomass to examine the effect of application of biostimulants on parameters of soil health and crop yield.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Biostimulants generally increased crop yield, basal soil respiration and microbial biomass, with effects stronger in EM soils than in IM soils, but effects on soil enzyme activities were variable. The combined use of biostimulant and inorganic fertiliser negated the benefits of the biostimulant on soil biological properties in some cases. Nevertheless, effects of biostimulants had a positive impact on crop yield with the combined use of soil-applied and seed applied biostimulants have the greatest impact on plant biomass and also conferring some resistance in both soil microbial communities and plant growth to drought.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While biomass and activity of the microbial community and plant growth responses to biostimulant additions are both soil and biostimulant dependent, their combined use has potential to aid both plants and maintain promote microbial activity under of drought, compared to conventional fertiliser treatments in extensively managed soils.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12093","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139727880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mechanical termination of a perennial grain crop minimally impacts soil structure, carbon and carbon dioxide emissions 机械终止多年生谷物作物对土壤结构、碳和二氧化碳排放的影响最小
Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1002/sae2.12094
Jacob Kundert, Manbir Rakkar, Jessica Gutknecht, Jacob Jungers

Introduction

Mechanical termination of crops can negatively affect soil biological, chemical, and structural characteristics. Perennial crops do not require annual termination and can improve these same soil characteristics, which has catalysed interest in the development of new perennial crops. Advanced lines of the perennial grass intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium [Host] Barkworth and Dewey; IWG) have been bred for increased seed size and marketed as Kernza® perennial grain, but little is known about how this new crop can be terminated for subsequent annual crop production in rotations that enhance agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.

Materials and Methods

Five methods of terminating IWG were tested in Minnesota, USA. Treatments included mechanical tillage using a chisel plow (CHI), undercutter (UND), and disc (DSC), along with no-till treatments of glyphosate (GLY) and a repeated-mowing control (CTRL). Treatment effects on IWG mortality, soil carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, bulk density, aggregate stability, soil carbon stocks and soybean yield were measured.

Results

Daily CO2 fluxes differed by treatment (p < 0.05) on only one of 19 sample dates, and cumulative soil CO2 emissions over the course of the growing season did not differ across treatments. Bulk density decreased relative to baseline in all treatments except CTRL. Aggregate stability remained unchanged in all treatments except CTRL, which increased from the baseline. Soil carbon stocks did not change in any treatment. Soybean yield was highest in GLY but was not significantly different from CHI or UND.

Conclusions

Soil structure, soil carbon stocks and soil CO2 emissions were unaffected by tillage and no-till IWG termination treatments. However, tillage followed by preplanting harrowing proved ineffective at terminating IWG and required subsequent summer herbicide applications. Therefore, additional tillage events may be required to fully terminate IWG when herbicide use is prohibited.

引言 农作物的机械终结会对土壤的生物、化学和结构特征产生负面影响。多年生作物不需要每年终止,而且可以改善这些相同的土壤特性,这激发了人们对开发新的多年生作物的兴趣。多年生禾本科植物中间麦草(Thinopyrum intermedium [Host] Barkworth and Dewey; IWG)的先进品系已经培育出来,种子体积增大,并作为 Kernza® 多年生谷物上市销售,但人们对这种新作物如何在提高农业生产率和环境可持续性的轮作中为随后的一年生作物生产进行终结却知之甚少。 材料与方法 在美国明尼苏达州测试了五种终止 IWG 的方法。处理方法包括使用凿犁(CHI)、开沟器(UND)和圆盘(DSC)进行机械耕作,以及草甘膦(GLY)免耕处理和重复刈割对照(CTRL)。测量了处理对 IWG 死亡率、土壤二氧化碳 (CO2) 排放量、容重、团粒稳定性、土壤碳储量和大豆产量的影响。 结果 在 19 个取样日期中,只有一个日期的日二氧化碳通量因处理而异(p <0.05),生长季期间的累积土壤二氧化碳排放量在不同处理之间没有差异。除 CTRL 外,所有处理的堆积密度都比基线低。除 CTRL 外,所有处理的团粒稳定性都保持不变,但 CTRL 比基线有所上升。各处理的土壤碳储量均无变化。GLY 的大豆产量最高,但与 CHI 和 UND 相比差异不大。 结论 土壤结构、土壤碳储量和土壤二氧化碳排放量不受耕作和免耕 IWG 终止处理的影响。然而,耕作后再进行播种前耙地被证明不能有效终止 IWG,需要在随后的夏季施用除草剂。因此,在禁止使用除草剂的情况下,可能需要额外的耕作才能完全终止 IWG。
{"title":"Mechanical termination of a perennial grain crop minimally impacts soil structure, carbon and carbon dioxide emissions","authors":"Jacob Kundert,&nbsp;Manbir Rakkar,&nbsp;Jessica Gutknecht,&nbsp;Jacob Jungers","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12094","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mechanical termination of crops can negatively affect soil biological, chemical, and structural characteristics. Perennial crops do not require annual termination and can improve these same soil characteristics, which has catalysed interest in the development of new perennial crops. Advanced lines of the perennial grass intermediate wheatgrass (<i>Thinopyrum intermedium</i> [Host] Barkworth and Dewey; IWG) have been bred for increased seed size and marketed as Kernza® perennial grain, but little is known about how this new crop can be terminated for subsequent annual crop production in rotations that enhance agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five methods of terminating IWG were tested in Minnesota, USA. Treatments included mechanical tillage using a chisel plow (CHI), undercutter (UND), and disc (DSC), along with no-till treatments of glyphosate (GLY) and a repeated-mowing control (CTRL). Treatment effects on IWG mortality, soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, bulk density, aggregate stability, soil carbon stocks and soybean yield were measured.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Daily CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes differed by treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) on only one of 19 sample dates, and cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the course of the growing season did not differ across treatments. Bulk density decreased relative to baseline in all treatments except CTRL. Aggregate stability remained unchanged in all treatments except CTRL, which increased from the baseline. Soil carbon stocks did not change in any treatment. Soybean yield was highest in GLY but was not significantly different from CHI or UND.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Soil structure, soil carbon stocks and soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were unaffected by tillage and no-till IWG termination treatments. However, tillage followed by preplanting harrowing proved ineffective at terminating IWG and required subsequent summer herbicide applications. Therefore, additional tillage events may be required to fully terminate IWG when herbicide use is prohibited.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139643873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1