Rangelands最新文献

Social science rangelands research has advanced substantively in the last few decades as a multidisciplinary endeavor, and notably through increased capacity to integrate with ecologically centered approaches.

The diversity of social science-related contributions to rangelands research continues to expand with both breadth and depth of approaches, perspectives, and backgrounds of participating scholars.

The USDA Long-term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network advances a unique long-term and large-scale effort to incorporate social science research into a long-term “common experiment” across multiple sites within varied rangelands contexts of the United States.

As “co-produced” research becomes more popular, there is a need to evaluate the processes and outcomes of successful cases.

The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management project is a case of a ranch-scale, 10-year grazing experiment ongoing in Colorado. We used social science to evaluate group learning.

We describe the complex, challenging aspects of the collaborative process, and how those challenges helped inspire learning as the team grappled with new problems and knowledge.

Respect, trust, and shared understanding are essential to success.

Social science can help collaborative research teams better design and implement complex co-production methods to engage stakeholders.

Multi-jurisdictional rangeland “mega-fires” are becoming more common.

Using interview data, we examined cross-boundary collaboration after the Soda Fire that burned approximately 113,312 ha (280,000 acres) of southwestern Idaho and southeastern Oregon.

We found relationships established in other management contexts were activated by individuals within agencies to share funding and resources to rehabilitate the landscape after the Soda Fire.

The fire's spatial proximity to Boise, Idaho, and temporal proximity to important federal policy decisions were primary collaboration drivers.

Barriers to collaborative efforts still exist; however, interviewees highlighted the importance of individual agency (bottom-up) changes in lessening top-down constraints.

We explored private landowner perceptions about the invasive Kentucky bluegrass in the US northern Great Plains.

Landowner responses to a mail survey indicated little to no preventative action.

We also employed a scenario approach to assess landowner perceptions based on changes to ecosystem services.

Scenario results indicated that the early stage of invasion was considered slightly acceptable. At the late stage, when negative impacts are most severe for landowner livelihoods, bluegrass was rated as slightly unacceptable.

Cascading impacts will become more evident and incentivizing early action to prevent further invasion is key to maintaining these working landscapes.

Agroecosystem research often focuses on biophysical processes and productivity without incorporating human dimensions research and/or stakeholder engagement.

Connecting individual and community well-being to agro-innovation research is required for agro-ecological transformation to sustainable intensification.

Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network sites have historically had varied degrees of human dimensions research within their research plan; however, LTAR's human dimensions capacity has grown.

To capitalize on this capacity, we propose a four-step framework for the LTAR Network to evolve a cohesive human dimensions strategy that brings together the social and ecological.

Continued institutional support is required to maintain and further pursue research that will support stakeholder co-developed science that facilitates agroecosystem transformations benefiting society.

Researchers have studied human dimensions of rangelands since the earliest days of US rangeland science, usually focusing only on white, male, English-speaking ranch owners.

To address questions of rural prosperity and collaborative management, social scientists and the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network must turn their attention to the perspectives, practices, and experiences of indigenous, non-Anglo, female, and “new rural” rangeland stakeholders as well.

Social science researchers can learn from scholars in related fields whose work is less often consulted in rangeland science, including those working internationally with pastoral communities and in the United States with rural youth.

Understanding these communities is likely to require broadening our conceptions of what constitutes “knowledge,” with a greater focus on seeking just outcomes for the full range of people who depend upon rangelands and rangeland communities for their lives and livelihoods.