首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America最新文献

英文 中文
Effectiveness of Beta-Lactam plus Doxycycline for Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. 内酰胺联合强力霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效。
Moe Uddin, Turab Mohammed, Mark Metersky, Antonio Anzueto, Carlos A Alvarez, Eric M Mortensen

Background: Despite clinical practice guideline recommendations to use doxycycline as part of combination therapy for some patients hospitalized with pneumonia, there is minimal evidence supporting this recommendation. Our aim was to examine the association between beta-lactam plus doxycycline and mortality for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: We identified patients >65 years of age admitted to any US Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in fiscal years 2002-2012 with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia. We excluded those patients who did not receive antibiotic therapy concordant with the 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) clinical practice guidelines. Using propensity score matching, we examined the association of doxycycline with 30- and 90-day mortality.

Results: Our overall cohort was comprised of 70533 patients and 5282 (7.49%) received doxycycline. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 6.4% for those who received a beta-lactam plus doxycycline versus 9.1% in those who did not (P < .0001), and 90-day mortality was 13.8% for those who received a beta-lactam + doxycycline versus 16.8% for those who did not (P < .0001). In the propensity score matched models, both 30- (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI], .63-.84) and 90-day (0.83, 95% CI, .74-.92) mortality were significantly lower for those who received doxycycline.

Conclusions: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we found that doxycycline use, as part of guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy, was associated with lower 30- and 90-day mortality than regimens without doxycycline. While this supports the safety and effectiveness of antibiotic regimes that include doxycycline, additional studies, especially randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm this.

背景:尽管临床实践指南建议将强力霉素作为一些住院肺炎患者联合治疗的一部分,但支持这一建议的证据很少。我们的目的是研究β -内酰胺加强力霉素与社区获得性肺炎住院患者死亡率之间的关系。方法:选取2002-2012财政年度美国退伍军人事务部医院收治的年龄>65岁且出院诊断为肺炎的患者。我们排除了未接受符合2019年美国胸科学会/美国传染病学会(ATS/IDSA)临床实践指南的抗生素治疗的患者。使用倾向评分匹配,我们检查了强力霉素与30天和90天死亡率的关系。结果:我们的整个队列包括70533例患者,5282例(7.49%)接受了强力霉素治疗。未经调整的30天死亡率,接受β -内酰胺加强力霉素组为6.4%,未接受强力霉素组为9.1% (P结论:在这项回顾性观察队列研究中,我们发现强力霉素作为符合指南的抗生素治疗的一部分,与不使用强力霉素的方案相比,使用强力霉素的30天和90天死亡率较低。虽然这支持包括强力霉素在内的抗生素方案的安全性和有效性,但需要进一步的研究,特别是随机临床试验来证实这一点。
{"title":"Effectiveness of Beta-Lactam plus Doxycycline for Patients Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.","authors":"Moe Uddin,&nbsp;Turab Mohammed,&nbsp;Mark Metersky,&nbsp;Antonio Anzueto,&nbsp;Carlos A Alvarez,&nbsp;Eric M Mortensen","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite clinical practice guideline recommendations to use doxycycline as part of combination therapy for some patients hospitalized with pneumonia, there is minimal evidence supporting this recommendation. Our aim was to examine the association between beta-lactam plus doxycycline and mortality for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients >65 years of age admitted to any US Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in fiscal years 2002-2012 with a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia. We excluded those patients who did not receive antibiotic therapy concordant with the 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) clinical practice guidelines. Using propensity score matching, we examined the association of doxycycline with 30- and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our overall cohort was comprised of 70533 patients and 5282 (7.49%) received doxycycline. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 6.4% for those who received a beta-lactam plus doxycycline versus 9.1% in those who did not (P < .0001), and 90-day mortality was 13.8% for those who received a beta-lactam + doxycycline versus 16.8% for those who did not (P < .0001). In the propensity score matched models, both 30- (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI], .63-.84) and 90-day (0.83, 95% CI, .74-.92) mortality were significantly lower for those who received doxycycline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective observational cohort study, we found that doxycycline use, as part of guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy, was associated with lower 30- and 90-day mortality than regimens without doxycycline. While this supports the safety and effectiveness of antibiotic regimes that include doxycycline, additional studies, especially randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm this.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402654/pdf/ciab863.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39602519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Efficacy of Early Treatment With Favipiravir on Disease Progression Among High-Risk Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial. 法匹拉韦早期治疗对高危冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)患者疾病进展的疗效:一项随机、开放标签的临床试验
Chuan Huan Chuah, Ting Soo Chow, Chee Peng Hor, Joo Thye Cheng, Hong Bee Ker, Heng Gee Lee, Kok Soon Lee, Noridah Nordin, Tiang Koi Ng, Masliza Zaid, Nor Zaila Zaidan, Suhaila Abdul Wahab, Nurul Ashikin Adnan, Noorlina Nordin, Tze Yuan Tee, Su Miin Ong, Suresh Kumar Chidambaram, Mahiran Mustafa

Background: The role of favipiravir in preventing disease progression in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains uncertain. We aimed to determine its effect in preventing disease progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia among high-risk COVID-19 patients.

Methods: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 public hospitals across Malaysia (February-July 2021) among 500 symptomatic, RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients, aged ≥50 years with ≥1 comorbidity, and hospitalized within first 7 days of illness. Patients were randomized 1:1 to favipiravir plus standard care or standard care alone. Favipiravir was administered at 1800 mg 2×/day on day 1 followed by 800 mg 2×/day until day 5. The primary endpoint was rate of clinical progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia. Secondary outcomes included rates of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality.

Results: Of 500 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.0] years; 258 women [51.6%]; 251 [50.2%] had COVID-19 pneumonia), 487 (97.4%) patients completed the trial. Clinical progression to hypoxia occurred in 46 (18.4%) patients on favipiravir plus standard care and 37 (14.8%) on standard care alone (OR, 1.30; 95% CI: .81-2.09; P = .28). All 3 prespecified secondary endpoints were similar between both groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 6 (2.4%) vs 5 (2.0%) (OR, 1.20; 95% CI: .36-4.23; P = .76), ICU admission in 13 (5.2%) vs 12 (4.8%) (OR, 1.09; 95% CI: .48-2.47; P = .84), and in-hospital mortality in 5 (2.0%) vs 0 (OR, 12.54; 95% CI: .76-207.84; P = .08) patients.

Conclusions: Among COVID-19 patients at high risk of disease progression, early treatment with oral favipiravir did not prevent their disease progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04818320).

背景:favipiravir在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)预防疾病进展中的作用尚不确定。我们的目的是确定其在预防高风险COVID-19患者从非缺氧到缺氧的疾病进展中的作用。方法:这是一项开放标签、随机临床试验,于2021年2月至7月在马来西亚的14家公立医院进行,研究对象为500名有症状的、rt - pcr确诊的COVID-19患者,年龄≥50岁,合并症≥1例,发病后7天内住院。患者按1:1随机分为favipiravir加标准治疗组或单独标准治疗组。第1天给予Favipiravir 1800 mg 2x /天,随后给予800 mg 2x /天至第5天。主要终点是从无缺氧到缺氧的临床进展率。次要结局包括机械通气率、重症监护病房(ICU)入院率和住院死亡率。结果:500例随机患者(平均[SD]年龄62.5[8.0]岁;258例(51.6%);新冠肺炎251例(50.2%),完成试验487例(97.4%)。46例(18.4%)患者服用favipiravir加标准治疗,37例(14.8%)患者单独服用标准治疗(OR, 1.30;95% ci: 0.81 -2.09;p = .28)。所有3个预先指定的次要终点在两组之间相似。6例(2.4%)vs 5例(2.0%)发生机械通气(OR, 1.20;95% ci: 0.36 -4.23;P = 0.76), ICU住院13例(5.2%)vs 12例(4.8%)(OR, 1.09;95% ci: 0.48 -2.47;P = 0.84),住院死亡率为5(2.0%)比0 (OR, 12.54;95% ci: 0.76 -207.84;P = .08)。结论:在疾病进展高风险的COVID-19患者中,早期口服法匹拉韦治疗并不能阻止其疾病从非缺氧向缺氧进展。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04818320)。
{"title":"Efficacy of Early Treatment With Favipiravir on Disease Progression Among High-Risk Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.","authors":"Chuan Huan Chuah,&nbsp;Ting Soo Chow,&nbsp;Chee Peng Hor,&nbsp;Joo Thye Cheng,&nbsp;Hong Bee Ker,&nbsp;Heng Gee Lee,&nbsp;Kok Soon Lee,&nbsp;Noridah Nordin,&nbsp;Tiang Koi Ng,&nbsp;Masliza Zaid,&nbsp;Nor Zaila Zaidan,&nbsp;Suhaila Abdul Wahab,&nbsp;Nurul Ashikin Adnan,&nbsp;Noorlina Nordin,&nbsp;Tze Yuan Tee,&nbsp;Su Miin Ong,&nbsp;Suresh Kumar Chidambaram,&nbsp;Mahiran Mustafa","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of favipiravir in preventing disease progression in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains uncertain. We aimed to determine its effect in preventing disease progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia among high-risk COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 public hospitals across Malaysia (February-July 2021) among 500 symptomatic, RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients, aged ≥50 years with ≥1 comorbidity, and hospitalized within first 7 days of illness. Patients were randomized 1:1 to favipiravir plus standard care or standard care alone. Favipiravir was administered at 1800 mg 2×/day on day 1 followed by 800 mg 2×/day until day 5. The primary endpoint was rate of clinical progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia. Secondary outcomes included rates of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 500 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.0] years; 258 women [51.6%]; 251 [50.2%] had COVID-19 pneumonia), 487 (97.4%) patients completed the trial. Clinical progression to hypoxia occurred in 46 (18.4%) patients on favipiravir plus standard care and 37 (14.8%) on standard care alone (OR, 1.30; 95% CI: .81-2.09; P = .28). All 3 prespecified secondary endpoints were similar between both groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 6 (2.4%) vs 5 (2.0%) (OR, 1.20; 95% CI: .36-4.23; P = .76), ICU admission in 13 (5.2%) vs 12 (4.8%) (OR, 1.09; 95% CI: .48-2.47; P = .84), and in-hospital mortality in 5 (2.0%) vs 0 (OR, 12.54; 95% CI: .76-207.84; P = .08) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among COVID-19 patients at high risk of disease progression, early treatment with oral favipiravir did not prevent their disease progression from nonhypoxia to hypoxia.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04818320).</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e432-e439"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39680345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 environmental contamination in hospital rooms is uncommon using viral culture techniques. 使用病毒培养技术,医院病房环境污染不常见。
Bobby G Warren, Alicia Nelson, Aaron Barrett, Bechtler Addison, Amanda Graves, Raquel Binder, Gregory Gray, Sarah Lewis, Becky A Smith, David J Weber, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, Deverick J Anderson

We assessed environmental contamination of inpatient rooms housing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in a dedicated COVID-19 unit. Contamination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was found on 5.5% (19/347) of surfaces via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and 0.3% (1/347) of surfaces via cell culture. Environmental contamination is uncommon in hospitals rooms; RNA presence is not a specific indicator of infectious virus.

我们评估了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)专用病房中容纳2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的住院病房的环境污染。通过逆转录酶聚合酶链反应和细胞培养分别在5.5%(19/347)和0.3%(1/347)表面发现严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型污染。医院病房的环境污染不常见;RNA的存在并不是传染性病毒的特异性指标。
{"title":"Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 environmental contamination in hospital rooms is uncommon using viral culture techniques.","authors":"Bobby G Warren,&nbsp;Alicia Nelson,&nbsp;Aaron Barrett,&nbsp;Bechtler Addison,&nbsp;Amanda Graves,&nbsp;Raquel Binder,&nbsp;Gregory Gray,&nbsp;Sarah Lewis,&nbsp;Becky A Smith,&nbsp;David J Weber,&nbsp;Emily E Sickbert-Bennett,&nbsp;Deverick J Anderson","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciac023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assessed environmental contamination of inpatient rooms housing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in a dedicated COVID-19 unit. Contamination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was found on 5.5% (19/347) of surfaces via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and 0.3% (1/347) of surfaces via cell culture. Environmental contamination is uncommon in hospitals rooms; RNA presence is not a specific indicator of infectious virus.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e307-e309"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807208/pdf/ciac023.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39816057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Ultraviolet-C Light Evaluation as Adjunct Disinfection to Remove Multidrug-Resistant Organisms. 紫外- c光辅助消毒去除多重耐药菌的研究。
Clare Rock, Yea Jen Hsu, Melanie S Curless, Karen C Carroll, Tracy Ross Howard, Kathryn A Carson, Stephanie Cummings, Michael Anderson, Aaron M Milstone, Lisa L Maragakis

Background: Our objective was to determine if the addition of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light to daily and discharge patient room cleaning reduces healthcare-associated infection rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Clostridioides difficile in immunocompromised adults.

Methods: We performed a cluster randomized crossover control trial in 4 cancer and 1 solid organ transplant in-patient units at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. For study year 1, each unit was randomized to intervention of UV-C light plus standard environmental cleaning or control of standard environmental cleaning, followed by a 5-week washout period. In study year 2, units switched assignments. The outcomes were healthcare-associated rates of VRE or C. difficile. Statistical inference used a two-stage approach recommended for cluster-randomized trials with <15 clusters/arm.

Results: In total, 302 new VRE infections were observed during 45787 at risk patient-days. The incidence in control and intervention groups was 6.68 and 6.52 per 1000 patient-days respectively; the unadjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], .78 - 1.22; P = .54). There were 84 new C. difficile infections observed during 26118 at risk patient-days. The incidence in control and intervention periods was 2.64 and 3.78 per 1000 patient-days respectively; the unadjusted IRR was 1.43 (95% CI, .93 - 2.21; P = .98).

Conclusions: When used daily and at post discharge in addition to standard environmental cleaning, UV-C disinfection did not reduce VRE or C. difficile infection rates in cancer and solid organ transplant units.

背景:我们的目的是确定在日常和出院病房清洁中添加紫外线- c (UV-C)光是否可以降低免疫功能低下成人中万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)和艰难梭菌的医疗相关感染率。方法:我们在马里兰州巴尔的摩市约翰霍普金斯医院的4个癌症和1个实体器官移植住院病房进行了一项整群随机交叉对照试验。在研究第一年,每个单元随机分为UV-C光加标准环境清洁干预组或标准环境清洁对照组,然后是5周的洗脱期。在第二年的学习中,各单元交换了任务。结果是与医疗保健相关的VRE或艰难梭菌率。统计推断采用推荐用于集群随机试验的两阶段方法,结果显示:在45787例风险患者日期间,总共观察到302例新的VRE感染。对照组和干预组的发病率分别为6.68和6.52 / 1000患者-日;未调整的发病率比(IRR)为0.98(95%可信区间[CI], 0.78 - 1.22;p = .54)。在26118个危险患者日期间,共观察到84例新的艰难梭菌感染。对照组和干预期的发病率分别为2.64和3.78 / 1000患者-日;未调整的IRR为1.43 (95% CI, 0.93 - 2.21;p = .98)。结论:除了标准的环境清洁外,日常使用和出院后使用UV-C消毒并没有降低癌症和实体器官移植单位的VRE或艰难梭菌感染率。
{"title":"Ultraviolet-C Light Evaluation as Adjunct Disinfection to Remove Multidrug-Resistant Organisms.","authors":"Clare Rock,&nbsp;Yea Jen Hsu,&nbsp;Melanie S Curless,&nbsp;Karen C Carroll,&nbsp;Tracy Ross Howard,&nbsp;Kathryn A Carson,&nbsp;Stephanie Cummings,&nbsp;Michael Anderson,&nbsp;Aaron M Milstone,&nbsp;Lisa L Maragakis","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab896","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our objective was to determine if the addition of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light to daily and discharge patient room cleaning reduces healthcare-associated infection rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Clostridioides difficile in immunocompromised adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cluster randomized crossover control trial in 4 cancer and 1 solid organ transplant in-patient units at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. For study year 1, each unit was randomized to intervention of UV-C light plus standard environmental cleaning or control of standard environmental cleaning, followed by a 5-week washout period. In study year 2, units switched assignments. The outcomes were healthcare-associated rates of VRE or C. difficile. Statistical inference used a two-stage approach recommended for cluster-randomized trials with <15 clusters/arm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 302 new VRE infections were observed during 45787 at risk patient-days. The incidence in control and intervention groups was 6.68 and 6.52 per 1000 patient-days respectively; the unadjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], .78 - 1.22; P = .54). There were 84 new C. difficile infections observed during 26118 at risk patient-days. The incidence in control and intervention periods was 2.64 and 3.78 per 1000 patient-days respectively; the unadjusted IRR was 1.43 (95% CI, .93 - 2.21; P = .98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When used daily and at post discharge in addition to standard environmental cleaning, UV-C disinfection did not reduce VRE or C. difficile infection rates in cancer and solid organ transplant units.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/fe/ciab896.PMC9402681.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39507649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Safety and Efficacy of Levamisole in Loiasis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial. 左旋咪唑治疗红斑狼疮的安全性和有效性:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Jérémy T Campillo, Paul Bikita, Marlhand Hemilembolo, Frédéric Louya, François Missamou, Sébastien D S Pion, Michel Boussinesq, CédricB Chesnais

Background: Individuals with high microfilarial densities (MFDs) of Loa loa are at risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) after ivermectin treatment. Pretreatment with drugs progressively reducing Loa MFDs below the risk threshold might help prevent these SAEs. We assessed the safety and efficacy of levamisole for this purpose.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, MFD-ascending trial was conducted in the Republic of the Congo. Participants were treated in 3 cohorts defined by pretreatment MFD and levamisole dose (cohort 1: 1.0kg and 1.5mg/kg; cohorts 2 and 3: 2.5mg/kg). Safety outcomes were occurrence of SAE and adverse event frequency during the first week. The efficacy outcomes were MFD reduction from baseline and proportions of individuals with at least 40% and 80% MFD reduction at day 2 (D2), D7, and D30.

Results: The 2 lowest doses (1.0mg/kg and 1.5mg/kg) caused no SAEs but were ineffective. Compared with placebo, 2.5mg/kg levamisole caused more mild adverse events (10/85 vs. 3/85, P=.018), a higher median reduction from baseline to D2 (-12.9% vs. +15.5%, P<.001), D7 (-4.9% vs. +18.7%, P<.001), and D30 (-0.5% vs. +13.5%, P=.036) and a higher percentage of participants with >40% MFD reduction at D2 (17.5% vs. 1.2%, P<.001), D7 (11.8% vs. 6.3%, P=.269), and D30 (18.5% vs. 9.6%, P=.107).

Conclusions: A single 2.5mg/kg levamisole dose induces a promising transient reduction in Loa loa MFDs and should encourage testing different regimens.

背景:Loa Loa微丝虫密度高(MFDs)的个体在伊维菌素治疗后存在发生严重不良事件(sae)的风险。药物预处理逐步降低Loa mfd低于风险阈值可能有助于预防这些SAEs。我们为此目的评估了左旋咪唑的安全性和有效性。方法:在刚果共和国进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、mfd上升试验。受试者按预处理MFD和左旋咪唑剂量分为3个队列(队列1:1.0kg和1.5mg/kg;队列2和3:2.5mg/kg)。安全性指标为第一周内SAE的发生和不良事件的发生频率。疗效结果是MFD较基线减少,以及在第2天(D2)、第7天和第30天MFD减少至少40%和80%的个体比例。结果:最低剂量1.0mg/kg和1.5mg/kg均无不良反应,但无效。与安慰剂相比,2.5mg/kg左旋咪唑引起了更多的轻度不良事件(10/85 vs 3/85, P= 0.018),从基线到D2的中位减幅更高(-12.9% vs +15.5%), D2时MFD降低P40% (17.5% vs 1.2%)。结论:单剂量2.5mg/kg左旋咪唑可导致Loa Loa MFD有希望的短暂降低,应鼓励试验不同的方案。
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Levamisole in Loiasis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jérémy T Campillo,&nbsp;Paul Bikita,&nbsp;Marlhand Hemilembolo,&nbsp;Frédéric Louya,&nbsp;François Missamou,&nbsp;Sébastien D S Pion,&nbsp;Michel Boussinesq,&nbsp;CédricB Chesnais","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with high microfilarial densities (MFDs) of Loa loa are at risk of developing serious adverse events (SAEs) after ivermectin treatment. Pretreatment with drugs progressively reducing Loa MFDs below the risk threshold might help prevent these SAEs. We assessed the safety and efficacy of levamisole for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, MFD-ascending trial was conducted in the Republic of the Congo. Participants were treated in 3 cohorts defined by pretreatment MFD and levamisole dose (cohort 1: 1.0kg and 1.5mg/kg; cohorts 2 and 3: 2.5mg/kg). Safety outcomes were occurrence of SAE and adverse event frequency during the first week. The efficacy outcomes were MFD reduction from baseline and proportions of individuals with at least 40% and 80% MFD reduction at day 2 (D2), D7, and D30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2 lowest doses (1.0mg/kg and 1.5mg/kg) caused no SAEs but were ineffective. Compared with placebo, 2.5mg/kg levamisole caused more mild adverse events (10/85 vs. 3/85, P=.018), a higher median reduction from baseline to D2 (-12.9% vs. +15.5%, P<.001), D7 (-4.9% vs. +18.7%, P<.001), and D30 (-0.5% vs. +13.5%, P=.036) and a higher percentage of participants with >40% MFD reduction at D2 (17.5% vs. 1.2%, P<.001), D7 (11.8% vs. 6.3%, P=.269), and D30 (18.5% vs. 9.6%, P=.107).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single 2.5mg/kg levamisole dose induces a promising transient reduction in Loa loa MFDs and should encourage testing different regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"19-27"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/3c/ciab906.PMC9402607.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39522055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Circulating Ubiquitous RNA, A Highly Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients. 循环无所不在的RNA是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者高度预测和预后的生物标志物
Thomas Bruneau, Maxime Wack, Geoffroy Poulet, Nicolas Robillard, Aurélien Philippe, Pierre Laurent Puig, Laurent Bélec, Jérôme Hadjadj, Wenjin Xiao, Julia Linnea Kallberg, Solen Kernéis, Jean Luc Diehl, Benjamin Terrier, David M Smadja, Valerie Taly, David Veyer, Hélène Péré

Background: Approximately 15-30% of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic tissue injury, and/or multi-organ failure leading to death in around 45% of cases. There is a clear need for biomarkers that quantify tissue injury, predict clinical outcomes, and guide the clinical management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods: We herein report the quantification by droplet-based digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNAemia and the plasmatic release of a ubiquitous human intracellular marker, the ribonuclease P (RNase P) in order to evaluate tissue injury and cell lysis in the plasma of 139 COVID-19 hospitalized patients at admission.

Results: We confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was associated with clinical severity of COVID-19 patients. In addition, we showed that plasmatic RNase P RNAemia at admission was also highly correlated with disease severity (P < .001) and invasive mechanical ventilation status (P < .001) but not with pulmonary severity. Altogether, these results indicate a consequent cell lysis process in severe and critical patients but not systematically due to lung cell death. Finally, the plasmatic RNase P RNA value was also significantly associated with overall survival.

Conclusions: Viral and ubiquitous blood biomarkers monitored by ddPCR could be useful for the clinical monitoring and the management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Moreover, these results could pave the way for new and more personalized circulating biomarkers in COVID-19, and more generally in infectious diseases, specific from each patient organ injury profile.

背景:约15-30%的住院2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征、全身性组织损伤和/或多器官衰竭,导致约45%的病例死亡。显然需要生物标志物来量化组织损伤,预测临床结果,并指导住院COVID-19患者的临床管理。方法:采用基于液滴的数字聚合酶链式反应(ddPCR)定量检测了139例入院的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNAemia,并检测了普遍存在的人细胞内标志物核糖核酸酶P (RNase P)的血浆释放情况,以评估入院时139例COVID-19住院患者血浆中的组织损伤和细胞裂解情况。结果:我们证实SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia与COVID-19患者的临床严重程度相关。此外,我们发现入院时血浆RNase P RNAemia也与疾病严重程度高度相关(P结论:ddPCR监测的病毒和无处不在的血液生物标志物可用于临床监测和住院COVID-19患者的管理。此外,这些结果可以为在COVID-19中找到新的、更个性化的循环生物标志物铺平道路,更广泛地说,在传染病中,根据每个患者的器官损伤情况,找到新的、更个性化的循环生物标志物。
{"title":"Circulating Ubiquitous RNA, A Highly Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Hospitalized Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients.","authors":"Thomas Bruneau, Maxime Wack, Geoffroy Poulet, Nicolas Robillard, Aurélien Philippe, Pierre Laurent Puig, Laurent Bélec, Jérôme Hadjadj, Wenjin Xiao, Julia Linnea Kallberg, Solen Kernéis, Jean Luc Diehl, Benjamin Terrier, David M Smadja, Valerie Taly, David Veyer, Hélène Péré","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab997","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciab997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 15-30% of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic tissue injury, and/or multi-organ failure leading to death in around 45% of cases. There is a clear need for biomarkers that quantify tissue injury, predict clinical outcomes, and guide the clinical management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We herein report the quantification by droplet-based digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNAemia and the plasmatic release of a ubiquitous human intracellular marker, the ribonuclease P (RNase P) in order to evaluate tissue injury and cell lysis in the plasma of 139 COVID-19 hospitalized patients at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia was associated with clinical severity of COVID-19 patients. In addition, we showed that plasmatic RNase P RNAemia at admission was also highly correlated with disease severity (P < .001) and invasive mechanical ventilation status (P < .001) but not with pulmonary severity. Altogether, these results indicate a consequent cell lysis process in severe and critical patients but not systematically due to lung cell death. Finally, the plasmatic RNase P RNA value was also significantly associated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Viral and ubiquitous blood biomarkers monitored by ddPCR could be useful for the clinical monitoring and the management of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Moreover, these results could pave the way for new and more personalized circulating biomarkers in COVID-19, and more generally in infectious diseases, specific from each patient organ injury profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e410-e417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8689820/pdf/ciab997.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39577307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inequities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Rates Among Adolescents in Massachusetts: A Cross-sectional Study. 马萨诸塞州青少年2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种率的不平等:一项横断面研究
David X Gao, Lloyd D Fisher, Donald R Miller, Alan C Geller

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected more socioeconomically disadvantaged persons and areas. We sought to determine how certain sociodemographic factors were correlated to adolescents' COVID-19 vaccination rates in towns and cities ("communities") in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Methods: Data on COVID-19 vaccination rates were obtained over a 20-week period from 30 March 2021 to 10 August 2021. Communities' adolescent (ages 12-19) vaccination rates were compared across quintiles of community-level income, COVID-19 case rate, and proportion of non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic individuals. Other variables included population density and earlier COVID-19 vaccination rates of adolescents and adults, averaged from 30 March to 11 May to determine their effects on vaccination rates on 10 August. Linear and logistic regression was used to estimate individual effects of variables on adolescent vaccination rates.

Results: Higher median household income, lower proportion of Black or Hispanic individuals, higher early adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates, and higher early adult COVID-19 vaccination rates were associated with higher later adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates. Income per $10 000 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.01 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.02]), proportion of Hispanic individuals (aOR = 1.33 [95% CI: 1.13-1.56]), early adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates (aOR = 5.28 [95% CI: 4.67-5.96]), and early adult COVID-19 vaccination rates (aOR = 2.31 [95% CI: 2.02-2.64]) were associated with higher adolescent COVID-19 vaccination on 10 August, whereas proportion of Black individuals approached significance (aOR = 1.26 [95% CI: .98-1.61]).

Conclusions: Vaccination efforts for adolescents in Massachusetts should focus on boosting vaccination rates early in communities with the lowest incomes and greatest proportion of Hispanic individuals and consider targeting communities with a greater proportion of Black individuals.

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对更多社会经济弱势群体和地区造成了不成比例的影响。我们试图确定某些社会人口因素如何与马萨诸塞州城镇(“社区”)青少年的COVID-19疫苗接种率相关。方法:获取2021年3月30日至2021年8月10日20周期间COVID-19疫苗接种率数据。社区青少年(12-19岁)疫苗接种率在社区收入、COVID-19病例率和非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔个人比例的五分位数之间进行了比较。其他变量包括3月30日至5月11日期间青少年和成人的人口密度和早期COVID-19疫苗接种率,以确定其对8月10日疫苗接种率的影响。使用线性和逻辑回归来估计变量对青少年疫苗接种率的个体影响。结果:较高的家庭收入中位数、较低的黑人或西班牙裔人群比例、较高的青少年早期COVID-19疫苗接种率和较高的成人早期COVID-19疫苗接种率与较高的青少年后期COVID-19疫苗接种率相关。每1万美元收入(校正优势比[aOR] = 1.01[95%可信区间[CI] = 1.01-1.02])、西班牙裔人群比例(aOR = 1.33 [95% CI: 1.13-1.56])、青少年早期COVID-19疫苗接种率(aOR = 5.28 [95% CI: 4.67-5.96])和成人早期COVID-19疫苗接种率(aOR = 2.31 [95% CI: 2.02-2.64])与8月10日青少年COVID-19疫苗接种率较高相关,而黑人人群比例接近显著水平(aOR = 1.26 [95% CI: 0.98 -1.61])。结论:马萨诸塞州青少年的疫苗接种工作应侧重于提高收入最低和西班牙裔比例最高的社区的早期疫苗接种率,并考虑针对黑人比例更高的社区。
{"title":"Inequities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Rates Among Adolescents in Massachusetts: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"David X Gao, Lloyd D Fisher, Donald R Miller, Alan C Geller","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciac123","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciac123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected more socioeconomically disadvantaged persons and areas. We sought to determine how certain sociodemographic factors were correlated to adolescents' COVID-19 vaccination rates in towns and cities (\"communities\") in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on COVID-19 vaccination rates were obtained over a 20-week period from 30 March 2021 to 10 August 2021. Communities' adolescent (ages 12-19) vaccination rates were compared across quintiles of community-level income, COVID-19 case rate, and proportion of non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic individuals. Other variables included population density and earlier COVID-19 vaccination rates of adolescents and adults, averaged from 30 March to 11 May to determine their effects on vaccination rates on 10 August. Linear and logistic regression was used to estimate individual effects of variables on adolescent vaccination rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher median household income, lower proportion of Black or Hispanic individuals, higher early adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates, and higher early adult COVID-19 vaccination rates were associated with higher later adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates. Income per $10 000 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.01 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.02]), proportion of Hispanic individuals (aOR = 1.33 [95% CI: 1.13-1.56]), early adolescent COVID-19 vaccination rates (aOR = 5.28 [95% CI: 4.67-5.96]), and early adult COVID-19 vaccination rates (aOR = 2.31 [95% CI: 2.02-2.64]) were associated with higher adolescent COVID-19 vaccination on 10 August, whereas proportion of Black individuals approached significance (aOR = 1.26 [95% CI: .98-1.61]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccination efforts for adolescents in Massachusetts should focus on boosting vaccination rates early in communities with the lowest incomes and greatest proportion of Hispanic individuals and consider targeting communities with a greater proportion of Black individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e611-e616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903391/pdf/ciac123.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39789322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant. 2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗对Delta变体的比较效果
Malcolm Risk, Chen Shen, Salim S Hayek, Lynn Holevinski, Elena Schiopu, Gary Freed, Cem Akin, Lili Zhao

Background: There is a lack of data regarding how the Delta variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson-Janssen) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 hospitalization.

Methods: We compared the effectiveness of the three vaccines during the pre- and post-Delta variant period (before and after 1 July 2021) in a large cohort of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the Michigan Medicine healthcare system. We assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) using 2 analyses: an inverse propensity weighted (IPW) Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis based on time from vaccination, and a Cox model based on calendar time with vaccination as a time-varying covariate.

Results: Compared to Ad26.COV2.S recipients, the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 in the post-Delta variant period was lower for BNT162b2 recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [.14-.98]; P = .05) and mRNA-1273 recipients (HR = 0.21; 95% CI: [.07-.64]; P = .006). Recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine had a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than Ad26.COV2.S recipients (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: [.43-.83]; P = .003) and BNT162b2 recipients (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: [.54-.76]; P < .001). After 1 July, efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection declined for Ad26.COV2.S recipients (VE = 76% before; VE = 49% after; P = .02), BNT162b2 recipients (VE = 87% before; VE = 52% after; P < .001), and mRNA-1273 recipients (VE = 92% before; VE = 70% after; P < .001). Waning immunity and the Delta variant contributed independently and significantly to this decline.

Conclusions: Although there is a substantial decline in effectiveness, the approved COVID-19 vaccines remain effective against infection and hospitalization due to the Delta variant. The mRNA-based vaccines are more effective than the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine.

背景:目前缺乏关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19) Delta变异如何影响BNT162b2(辉瑞- biontech)、mRNA-1273 (Moderna)和Ad26.COV2有效性的数据。S (Johnson & Johnson- janssen)疫苗预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染和COVID-19住院治疗。方法:我们比较了三种疫苗在delta变异前后(2021年7月1日之前和之后)在密歇根医学保健系统中接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者的大型队列中的有效性。我们使用2种分析来评估疫苗有效性(VE):基于疫苗接种时间的逆倾向加权(IPW) Kaplan-Meier (KM)分析,以及基于日历时间的Cox模型,其中疫苗接种作为时变协变量。结果:与Ad26.COV2相比。BNT162b2组患者在delta变异后住院的风险较低(风险比[HR] = 0.37; 95%可信区间[CI]: [.14-.98]; P =。05),信使rna - 1273收件人(HR = 0.21; 95%置信区间:[。07 .64点];P = .006)。mRNA-1273疫苗接种者感染SARS-CoV-2的风险低于Ad26.COV2。95% CI: [.43-.83]; P =。结论:虽然有效性大幅下降,但已批准的COVID-19疫苗对Delta变异引起的感染和住院仍然有效。基于mrna的疫苗比Ad26.COV2更有效。年代的疫苗。
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant.","authors":"Malcolm Risk, Chen Shen, Salim S Hayek, Lynn Holevinski, Elena Schiopu, Gary Freed, Cem Akin, Lili Zhao","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciac106","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciac106","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of data regarding how the Delta variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson-Janssen) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the effectiveness of the three vaccines during the pre- and post-Delta variant period (before and after 1 July 2021) in a large cohort of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the Michigan Medicine healthcare system. We assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) using 2 analyses: an inverse propensity weighted (IPW) Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis based on time from vaccination, and a Cox model based on calendar time with vaccination as a time-varying covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Ad26.COV2.S recipients, the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 in the post-Delta variant period was lower for BNT162b2 recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [.14-.98]; P = .05) and mRNA-1273 recipients (HR = 0.21; 95% CI: [.07-.64]; P = .006). Recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine had a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than Ad26.COV2.S recipients (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: [.43-.83]; P = .003) and BNT162b2 recipients (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: [.54-.76]; P < .001). After 1 July, efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection declined for Ad26.COV2.S recipients (VE = 76% before; VE = 49% after; P = .02), BNT162b2 recipients (VE = 87% before; VE = 52% after; P < .001), and mRNA-1273 recipients (VE = 92% before; VE = 70% after; P < .001). Waning immunity and the Delta variant contributed independently and significantly to this decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is a substantial decline in effectiveness, the approved COVID-19 vaccines remain effective against infection and hospitalization due to the Delta variant. The mRNA-based vaccines are more effective than the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e623-e629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047165/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39902120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comorbidity Increases the Risk of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Adults. 合并症增加成人侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病的风险。
Lene Fogt Lundbo, Zitta Barrella Harboe, Håkon Sandholdt, Lars Smith-Hansen, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Steen Hoffmann, Thomas Benfield

Background: Risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is increased in patients with complement deficiency and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Risk associated with comorbidity is not well described.

Methods: This was a nationwide adult case-control study. Cases for the period 1977-2018 were identified by the national meningococcus reference laboratory. Matched controls were identified by registry linkage. Comorbidities diagnosed prior to IMD were based on the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth or Tenth Revision. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression after adjustment for sex, age, and other comorbidities.

Results: We identified 1221 cases (45% male), with a median age of 45 years (interquartile range, 22-64 years). The dominant meningococcal serogroups were B (n = 738) and C (n = 337). Increased risk of IMD was associated with solid organ transplantation (SOT) (OR 40.47 [95% CI: 4.84-337.23]), hemolytic anemia (OR 7.56 [95% CI: 2.63-21.79]), renal disease (OR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.77-4.92]), liver disease (OR 2.54 [95% CI: 1.58-4.08]), cancer (OR 2.31 [95% CI: 1.85-2.89]), diabetes (OR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.27-2.39]), neurological disease (OR 1.72 [95% CI: 1.20-2.46]), and autoimmune disease (OR 1.70 [95% CI: 1.63-2.11]). Having 1, 2, and ≥3 comorbidities was associated with increased risk of IMD (ORs 1.6-3.5). Increased risk was not associated with specific serogroups.

Conclusions: This study of adults with IMD over 4 decades showed increased risk of IMD associated with renal disease, immunological disorders, liver disease, cancer, and SOT ranging from a 2- to 40-fold increased risk. Vaccination may be warranted in these populations.

背景:补体缺乏和人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染的患者发生侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病(IMD)的风险增加。与合并症相关的风险没有得到很好的描述。方法:这是一项全国成人病例对照研究。1977-2018年病例由国家脑膜炎球菌参比实验室鉴定。匹配的控件通过注册表链接识别。在IMD之前诊断的合并症是基于《国际疾病分类》第八版或第十版。调整性别、年龄和其他合并症后,通过逻辑回归估计95%置信区间(ci)的优势比(ORs)。结果:我们确定了1221例(45%为男性),中位年龄为45岁(四分位数范围22-64岁)。优势脑膜炎球菌血清群为B(738例)和C(337例)。IMD风险增加与实体器官移植(SOT) (OR 40.47 [95% CI: 4.84-337.23])、溶血性贫血(OR 7.56 [95% CI: 2.63-21.79])、肾脏疾病(OR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.77-4.92])、肝脏疾病(OR 2.54 [95% CI: 1.58-4.08])、癌症(OR 2.31 [95% CI: 1.85-2.89])、糖尿病(OR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.27-2.39])、神经系统疾病(OR 1.72 [95% CI: 1.20-2.46])和自身免疫性疾病(OR 1.70 [95% CI: 1.63-2.11])相关。有1、2和≥3个合并症与IMD风险增加相关(or 1.6-3.5)。风险增加与特定血清组无关。结论:这项对40年以上IMD成人患者的研究显示,IMD与肾脏疾病、免疫系统疾病、肝脏疾病、癌症和SOT相关的风险增加,风险增加2- 40倍。在这些人群中可能需要接种疫苗。
{"title":"Comorbidity Increases the Risk of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in Adults.","authors":"Lene Fogt Lundbo,&nbsp;Zitta Barrella Harboe,&nbsp;Håkon Sandholdt,&nbsp;Lars Smith-Hansen,&nbsp;Palle Valentiner-Branth,&nbsp;Steen Hoffmann,&nbsp;Thomas Benfield","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciab856","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is increased in patients with complement deficiency and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Risk associated with comorbidity is not well described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a nationwide adult case-control study. Cases for the period 1977-2018 were identified by the national meningococcus reference laboratory. Matched controls were identified by registry linkage. Comorbidities diagnosed prior to IMD were based on the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth or Tenth Revision. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression after adjustment for sex, age, and other comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1221 cases (45% male), with a median age of 45 years (interquartile range, 22-64 years). The dominant meningococcal serogroups were B (n = 738) and C (n = 337). Increased risk of IMD was associated with solid organ transplantation (SOT) (OR 40.47 [95% CI: 4.84-337.23]), hemolytic anemia (OR 7.56 [95% CI: 2.63-21.79]), renal disease (OR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.77-4.92]), liver disease (OR 2.54 [95% CI: 1.58-4.08]), cancer (OR 2.31 [95% CI: 1.85-2.89]), diabetes (OR 1.74 [95% CI: 1.27-2.39]), neurological disease (OR 1.72 [95% CI: 1.20-2.46]), and autoimmune disease (OR 1.70 [95% CI: 1.63-2.11]). Having 1, 2, and ≥3 comorbidities was associated with increased risk of IMD (ORs 1.6-3.5). Increased risk was not associated with specific serogroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of adults with IMD over 4 decades showed increased risk of IMD associated with renal disease, immunological disorders, liver disease, cancer, and SOT ranging from a 2- to 40-fold increased risk. Vaccination may be warranted in these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39476974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Omicron Variant Escapes Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) Including Recently Released Evusheld®, Contrary to 8 Prior Main Variant of Concern (VOC). Omicron变体逃避治疗性单克隆抗体(mab),包括最近发布的Evusheld®,与之前的8种主要关注变体(VOC)相反。
Céline Boschi, Philippe Colson, Audrey Bancod, Valérie Moal, Bernard La Scola
{"title":"Omicron Variant Escapes Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) Including Recently Released Evusheld®, Contrary to 8 Prior Main Variant of Concern (VOC).","authors":"Céline Boschi,&nbsp;Philippe Colson,&nbsp;Audrey Bancod,&nbsp;Valérie Moal,&nbsp;Bernard La Scola","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciac143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac143","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":" ","pages":"e534-e535"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402686/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39636529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1