Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041386
Ahmed Mahmoud, Karuna Ganesh
Metastasis is the ultimate and often lethal stage of cancer. Metastasis occurs in three phases that may vary across individuals: First, dissemination from the primary tumor. Second, tumor dormancy at the metastatic site where micrometastatic cancer cells remain quiescent or, in dynamic cycles of proliferation and elimination, remaining clinically undetectable. Finally, cancer cells are able to overcome microenvironmental constraints for outgrowth, or the formation of clinically detectable macrometastases that colonize distant organs and are largely incurable. A variety of approaches have been used to model metastasis to elucidate molecular mechanisms and identify putative therapeutic targets. In particular, metastatic dormancy has been challenging to model in vivo due to the sparse numbers of cancer cells in micrometastasis nodules and the long latency times required for tumor outgrowth. Here, we review state-of-the art genetically engineered mouse, syngeneic, and patient-derived xenograft approaches for modeling metastasis and dormancy. We describe the advantages and limitations of various metastasis models, novel findings enabled by such approaches, and highlight opportunities for future improvement.
{"title":"Mouse Models of Metastasis and Dormancy.","authors":"Ahmed Mahmoud, Karuna Ganesh","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041386","DOIUrl":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metastasis is the ultimate and often lethal stage of cancer. Metastasis occurs in three phases that may vary across individuals: First, dissemination from the primary tumor. Second, tumor dormancy at the metastatic site where micrometastatic cancer cells remain quiescent or, in dynamic cycles of proliferation and elimination, remaining clinically undetectable. Finally, cancer cells are able to overcome microenvironmental constraints for outgrowth, or the formation of clinically detectable macrometastases that colonize distant organs and are largely incurable. A variety of approaches have been used to model metastasis to elucidate molecular mechanisms and identify putative therapeutic targets. In particular, metastatic dormancy has been challenging to model in vivo due to the sparse numbers of cancer cells in micrometastasis nodules and the long latency times required for tumor outgrowth. Here, we review state-of-the art genetically engineered mouse, syngeneic, and patient-derived xenograft approaches for modeling metastasis and dormancy. We describe the advantages and limitations of various metastasis models, novel findings enabled by such approaches, and highlight opportunities for future improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10925556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10213389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041318
Siddhartha Yadav, Fergus J Couch, Susan M Domchek
Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to BRCA1/2, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.
在过去二十年中,我们对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的认识有了显著提高。除 BRCA1/2 外,其他几个 DNA 修复基因的致病变异也被证明会增加罹患乳腺癌和卵巢癌的风险。癌症风险的大小不仅受相关基因的影响,还受癌症家族史、多基因风险评分以及某些基因的致病变异类型或位置的影响。虽然目前已有与致病变异相关的乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险估计值,但这些估计值主要是基于对确诊癌症时年龄较小、患有多种原发性癌症或有癌症家族史的高危人群的研究。最近,基于人群的研究估算了种系致病变异携带者患乳腺癌的风险。在此,我们将对高风险和基于人群的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的种系基因检测和风险评估领域进行综述。
{"title":"Germline Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Current Concepts in Risk Evaluation.","authors":"Siddhartha Yadav, Fergus J Couch, Susan M Domchek","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041318","DOIUrl":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041318","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our understanding of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has significantly improved over the past two decades. In addition to <i>BRCA1/2</i>, pathogenic variants in several other DNA-repair genes have been shown to increase the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The magnitude of cancer risk is impacted not only by the gene involved, but also by family history of cancer, polygenic risk scores, and, in certain genes, pathogenic variant type or location. While estimates of breast and ovarian cancer risk associated with pathogenic variants are available, these are predominantly based on studies of high-risk populations with young age at diagnosis of cancer, multiple primary cancers, or family history of cancer. More recently, breast cancer risk for germline pathogenic variant carriers has been estimated from population-based studies. Here, we provide a review of the field of germline genetic testing and risk evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in high-risk and population-based settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293548/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139048374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041201
Caitlin S Latimer, Katherine E Prater, Nadia Postupna, C Dirk Keene
Dementia is a significant public health crisis; the most common underlying cause of age-related cognitive decline and dementia is Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). As such, there is an urgent need to identify novel therapeutic targets for the treatment and prevention of the underlying pathologic processes that contribute to the development of AD dementia. Although age is the top risk factor for dementia in general and AD specifically, these are not inevitable consequences of advanced age. Some individuals are able to live to advanced age without accumulating significant pathology (resistance to ADNC), whereas others are able to maintain cognitive function despite the presence of significant pathology (resilience to ADNC). Understanding mechanisms of resistance and resilience will inform therapeutic strategies to promote these processes to prevent or delay AD dementia. This article will highlight what is currently known about resistance and resilience to AD, including our current understanding of possible underlying mechanisms that may lead to candidate preventive and treatment interventions for this devastating neurodegenerative disease.
{"title":"Resistance and Resilience to Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Caitlin S Latimer, Katherine E Prater, Nadia Postupna, C Dirk Keene","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041201","DOIUrl":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia is a significant public health crisis; the most common underlying cause of age-related cognitive decline and dementia is Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). As such, there is an urgent need to identify novel therapeutic targets for the treatment and prevention of the underlying pathologic processes that contribute to the development of AD dementia. Although age is the top risk factor for dementia in general and AD specifically, these are not inevitable consequences of advanced age. Some individuals are able to live to advanced age without accumulating significant pathology (resistance to ADNC), whereas others are able to maintain cognitive function despite the presence of significant pathology (resilience to ADNC). Understanding mechanisms of resistance and resilience will inform therapeutic strategies to promote these processes to prevent or delay AD dementia. This article will highlight what is currently known about resistance and resilience to AD, including our current understanding of possible underlying mechanisms that may lead to candidate preventive and treatment interventions for this devastating neurodegenerative disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293546/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139048375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041660
Volker Busskamp, Botond Roska, Jose-Alain Sahel
Optogenetics has emerged over the past 20 years as a powerful tool to investigate the various circuits underlying numerous functions, especially in neuroscience. The ability to control by light the activity of neurons has enabled the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring some level of vision in blinding retinal conditions. Promising preclinical and initial clinical data support such expectations. Numerous challenges remain to be tackled (e.g., confirmation of safety, cell and circuit specificity, patterns, intensity and mode of stimulation, rehabilitation programs) on the path toward useful vision restoration.
{"title":"Optogenetic Vision Restoration.","authors":"Volker Busskamp, Botond Roska, Jose-Alain Sahel","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041660","DOIUrl":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optogenetics has emerged over the past 20 years as a powerful tool to investigate the various circuits underlying numerous functions, especially in neuroscience. The ability to control by light the activity of neurons has enabled the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring some level of vision in blinding retinal conditions. Promising preclinical and initial clinical data support such expectations. Numerous challenges remain to be tackled (e.g., confirmation of safety, cell and circuit specificity, patterns, intensity and mode of stimulation, rehabilitation programs) on the path toward useful vision restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293536/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41112602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041595
Léo Bertrand, Alexander V Chervonsky, Agnès Lehuen
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the destruction of pancreatic β cells by the immune system, to which both pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and pathological activation of the immune system contribute. This paper is focused on understanding the modalities of this activation, and the genetic and environmental factors increasing its risk. Innate immunity has a critical role in the loss of self-tolerance and promotion of inflammation either directly using innate effector mechanisms or by providing activation signals to anti-islet adaptive autoimmunity. We provide an overview of various deleterious and protective roles of innate immunity in T1D inside pancreatic islets, regional lymph nodes, and distant locations such as the gut.
{"title":"Innate Immunity in Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Léo Bertrand, Alexander V Chervonsky, Agnès Lehuen","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the destruction of pancreatic β cells by the immune system, to which both pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and pathological activation of the immune system contribute. This paper is focused on understanding the modalities of this activation, and the genetic and environmental factors increasing its risk. Innate immunity has a critical role in the loss of self-tolerance and promotion of inflammation either directly using innate effector mechanisms or by providing activation signals to anti-islet adaptive autoimmunity. We provide an overview of various deleterious and protective roles of innate immunity in T1D inside pancreatic islets, regional lymph nodes, and distant locations such as the gut.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-29DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041624
Timothy J Kieffer, Corinne A Hoesli, A M James Shapiro
β-Cell replacement for type 1 diabetes (T1D) can restore normal glucose homeostasis, thereby eliminating the need for exogenous insulin and halting the progression of diabetes complications. Success in achieving insulin independence following transplantation of cadaveric islets fueled academic and industry efforts to develop techniques to mass produce β cells from human pluripotent stem cells, and these have now been clinically validated as an alternative source of regulated insulin production. Various encapsulation strategies are being pursued to contain implanted cells in a retrievable format, and different implant sites are being explored with some strategies reaching clinical studies. Stem cell lines, whether derived from embryonic sources or reprogrammed somatic cells, are being genetically modified for designer features, including immune evasiveness to enable implant without the use of chronic immunosuppression. Although hurdles remain in optimizing large-scale manufacturing, demonstrating efficacy, durability, and safety, products containing stem cell-derived β cells promise to provide a potent treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes.
{"title":"Advances in Islet Transplantation and the Future of Stem Cell-Derived Islets to Treat Diabetes.","authors":"Timothy J Kieffer, Corinne A Hoesli, A M James Shapiro","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>β-Cell replacement for type 1 diabetes (T1D) can restore normal glucose homeostasis, thereby eliminating the need for exogenous insulin and halting the progression of diabetes complications. Success in achieving insulin independence following transplantation of cadaveric islets fueled academic and industry efforts to develop techniques to mass produce β cells from human pluripotent stem cells, and these have now been clinically validated as an alternative source of regulated insulin production. Various encapsulation strategies are being pursued to contain implanted cells in a retrievable format, and different implant sites are being explored with some strategies reaching clinical studies. Stem cell lines, whether derived from embryonic sources or reprogrammed somatic cells, are being genetically modified for designer features, including immune evasiveness to enable implant without the use of chronic immunosuppression. Although hurdles remain in optimizing large-scale manufacturing, demonstrating efficacy, durability, and safety, products containing stem cell-derived β cells promise to provide a potent treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041603
Zoe Quandt, Ana Perdigoto, Mark S. Anderson, Kevan C. Herold
Immunomodulatory agents targeting immune checkpoints are now the state-of-the-art for the treatment of many cancers, but at the same time have led to autoimmune side effects, including autoimmune diabetes: immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes (CPI-DM). Emerging research shows the importance of preexisting autoimmune disease risk that has been identified through genetics, and autoantibodies. Key associated clinical findings also include increased levels of lipase before diagnosis suggesting that the inflammatory process in the pancreas extends beyond the islets of Langerhans. There is selectivity for the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) for this adverse event, consistent with the role of this checkpoint in maintaining tolerance to autoimmune diabetes.
{"title":"Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Autoimmune Diabetes: An Autoinflammatory Disease","authors":"Zoe Quandt, Ana Perdigoto, Mark S. Anderson, Kevan C. Herold","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041603","url":null,"abstract":"Immunomodulatory agents targeting immune checkpoints are now the state-of-the-art for the treatment of many cancers, but at the same time have led to autoimmune side effects, including autoimmune diabetes: immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes (CPI-DM). Emerging research shows the importance of preexisting autoimmune disease risk that has been identified through genetics, and autoantibodies. Key associated clinical findings also include increased levels of lipase before diagnosis suggesting that the inflammatory process in the pancreas extends beyond the islets of Langerhans. There is selectivity for the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) for this adverse event, consistent with the role of this checkpoint in maintaining tolerance to autoimmune diabetes.","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141744935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041605
Anil Bhushan, Peter J. Thompson
Recent years have seen increased recognition for the role of β-cell stress as a contributing factor to the autoimmune destruction process that ultimately results in symptomatic type 1 diabetes (T1D). Preclinical studies have discovered a variety of stress responses in the β-cell that occur at presymptomatic stages and contribute to disease progression, but unifying explanations of how these mechanisms operate to promote disease progression remain incomplete. We propose that stressed β-cells transition into β-cells expressing inflammatory molecules that provoke an immune response to restore homeostasis by coordinating islet repair and the removal of stressed cells. However, when immune surveillance fails, stressed β-cells accumulate and contribute to autoimmunity. Therapies directed toward stressed β-cells to either curb their inflammatory signaling or to eliminate them (essentially doing the job of the failed immune surveillance) are moving from animal models into the clinic with promising initial results, although the understanding of how the immune response is coordinated by stressed β-cells is not clear. In this article, we discuss β-cell stress responses implicated in T1D pathogenesis based on evidence from humans and highlight existing knowledge gaps in their mechanisms. Future work in this field is poised to target T1D by simultaneously targeting stressed β-cells and the failed immune response to halt the progression of autoimmunity and prevent β-cell destruction.
{"title":"Inflammatory β-Cell Stress and Immune Surveillance in Type 1 Diabetes","authors":"Anil Bhushan, Peter J. Thompson","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041605","url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen increased recognition for the role of β-cell stress as a contributing factor to the autoimmune destruction process that ultimately results in symptomatic type 1 diabetes (T1D). Preclinical studies have discovered a variety of stress responses in the β-cell that occur at presymptomatic stages and contribute to disease progression, but unifying explanations of how these mechanisms operate to promote disease progression remain incomplete. We propose that stressed β-cells transition into β-cells expressing inflammatory molecules that provoke an immune response to restore homeostasis by coordinating islet repair and the removal of stressed cells. However, when immune surveillance fails, stressed β-cells accumulate and contribute to autoimmunity. Therapies directed toward stressed β-cells to either curb their inflammatory signaling or to eliminate them (essentially doing the job of the failed immune surveillance) are moving from animal models into the clinic with promising initial results, although the understanding of how the immune response is coordinated by stressed β-cells is not clear. In this article, we discuss β-cell stress responses implicated in T1D pathogenesis based on evidence from humans and highlight existing knowledge gaps in their mechanisms. Future work in this field is poised to target T1D by simultaneously targeting stressed β-cells and the failed immune response to halt the progression of autoimmunity and prevent β-cell destruction.","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141744937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a disease whose pathogenesis is driven by both immune dysregulation and β-cell dysfunction. While the specialized structure and function of β cells make them vulnerable to autoimmunity, several surface receptor/ligand pairs underlie the cross talk engaged with T lymphocytes and other immune subsets. The expression of these ligands on β cells is coordinately up-regulated by the exposure to interferons, notably the type I interferons that represent the signature cytokines since the early preclinical stages of T1D. Yet, their interaction with receptors expressed on T lymphocytes can favor either β-cell vulnerability or protection. Despite several knowledge gaps, this novel holistic view of autoimmunity that incorporates both immune and β-cell-derived pathogenic drivers is starting to translate into novel therapeutic strategies aimed at decreasing vulnerability and/or increasing these protective mechanisms. This review summarizes the current knowledge in this evolving field, the assumptions that are often taken for granted but lack formal evidence, and the blind spots in this landscape that may hide further therapeutic opportunities.
1 型糖尿病(T1D)是一种发病机制由免疫失调和 β 细胞功能障碍共同驱动的疾病。β细胞的特异性结构和功能使其容易受到自身免疫的影响,而与T淋巴细胞和其他免疫亚群之间的交叉反应则是由几对表面受体/配体引起的。这些配体在 β 细胞上的表达受干扰素的影响而协调上调,特别是 I 型干扰素,它是 T1D 临床前早期阶段的标志性细胞因子。然而,干扰素与 T 淋巴细胞上表达的受体之间的相互作用既可能使 β 细胞变得脆弱,也可能起到保护作用。尽管还存在一些知识空白,但这种结合了免疫和β细胞衍生致病因素的新型自身免疫整体观已开始转化为新型治疗策略,旨在降低易感性和/或增强这些保护机制。本综述总结了这一不断发展的领域中的现有知识、通常被认为理所当然但缺乏正式证据的假设,以及这一领域中可能隐藏着更多治疗机会的盲点。
{"title":"Cross Talk between β Cells and Immune Cells: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Should Learn","authors":"Fatoumata Samassa, Capucine Holtzmann, Roberto Mallone","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041604","url":null,"abstract":"Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a disease whose pathogenesis is driven by both immune dysregulation and β-cell dysfunction. While the specialized structure and function of β cells make them vulnerable to autoimmunity, several surface receptor/ligand pairs underlie the cross talk engaged with T lymphocytes and other immune subsets. The expression of these ligands on β cells is coordinately up-regulated by the exposure to interferons, notably the type I interferons that represent the signature cytokines since the early preclinical stages of T1D. Yet, their interaction with receptors expressed on T lymphocytes can favor either β-cell vulnerability or protection. Despite several knowledge gaps, this novel holistic view of autoimmunity that incorporates both immune and β-cell-derived pathogenic drivers is starting to translate into novel therapeutic strategies aimed at decreasing vulnerability and/or increasing these protective mechanisms. This review summarizes the current knowledge in this evolving field, the assumptions that are often taken for granted but lack formal evidence, and the blind spots in this landscape that may hide further therapeutic opportunities.","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141744936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041574
Jeong A Park, Nai-Kong V Cheung
Children are surviving cancer in greater numbers than ever. Over the last 50 years, substantial advancements in pediatric cancer treatment have resulted in an 85% 5-year survival rate. Nonetheless, a notable 10%-15% of patients encounter relapse or develop refractory disease, leading to significantly lower survival. Recent attempts to further intensify cytotoxic chemotherapy have failed due to either severe toxicities or ineffectiveness, highlighting the need for new treatment strategies. Immunotherapies are emerging and expanding their clinical application to a wide array of cancers, including those affecting children. In pediatric cancers, monoclonal antibodies targeting GD2 have demonstrated durable radiographic and histologic responses in neuroblastoma (NB), and CD19-targeted bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have likewise changed the outlook for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. This review discusses the clinical development of immunotherapies for pediatric cancers, focusing on pediatric ALL and NB, two major pediatric cancers transformed by immunotherapy, updates on the recent advancements in immunotherapies, and further discusses the future directions of immunotherapy for pediatric cancers.
{"title":"Immunotherapies for Childhood Cancer.","authors":"Jeong A Park, Nai-Kong V Cheung","doi":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041574","DOIUrl":"10.1101/cshperspect.a041574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children are surviving cancer in greater numbers than ever. Over the last 50 years, substantial advancements in pediatric cancer treatment have resulted in an 85% 5-year survival rate. Nonetheless, a notable 10%-15% of patients encounter relapse or develop refractory disease, leading to significantly lower survival. Recent attempts to further intensify cytotoxic chemotherapy have failed due to either severe toxicities or ineffectiveness, highlighting the need for new treatment strategies. Immunotherapies are emerging and expanding their clinical application to a wide array of cancers, including those affecting children. In pediatric cancers, monoclonal antibodies targeting GD2 have demonstrated durable radiographic and histologic responses in neuroblastoma (NB), and CD19-targeted bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have likewise changed the outlook for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. This review discusses the clinical development of immunotherapies for pediatric cancers, focusing on pediatric ALL and NB, two major pediatric cancers transformed by immunotherapy, updates on the recent advancements in immunotherapies, and further discusses the future directions of immunotherapy for pediatric cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10452,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141619555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}