首页 > 最新文献

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Therapist self-disclosure in teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with real relationship and traumatic distress 新冠肺炎大流行早期远程治疗的治疗师自我隔离:与真实关系和创伤痛苦的关联。
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2915
Xiaochen Luo, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Vera Békés, Tracy A. Prout, Leon Hoffman

The usefulness of therapists' self-disclosure (TSD) in psychotherapy remains controversial, and little is known regarding the potential risks and benefits of TSD in times of global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic and in teletherapy. We examined two independent samples of therapists (N = 1705; Study 1) and patients (N = 772; Study 2) on their perceptions of increases in TSD during the transition to teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic (spring 2020). Approximately 20% of therapists and 14% of patients reported perceptions of definite increases in TSD. Therapists' top reasons for increased TSD were therapists' heightened distress and an effort to connect with patients in teletherapy. Importantly, therapist perceptions of their increased TSD were positively related to subjective vicarious trauma, real relationship, psychodynamic theoretical orientation and negatively with humanistic orientation, but not with age, race/ethnicity, length of clinical experience, working alliance, or professional self-doubt. Patients' perceptions of increased TSD were positively related with patient pandemic-related traumatic distress and their own self-disclosure, but not with patient-reported therapeutic relationship variables. Longitudinally, patients' perceptions of TSD increases predicted higher pandemic-related traumatic distress at 3-month follow-up, after controlling for their baseline traumatic distress and other variables. These results highlighted that increased TSD in teletherapy may be a potential marker for heightened distress in both patients and therapists during a global crisis and a transition to teletherapy. The findings also contrasted the literature and emphasized that therapists, but perhaps not patients, may have considered increased TSD as a reflection of genuine therapeutic connection.

治疗师自我隔离(TSD)在心理治疗中的作用仍然存在争议,在新冠肺炎大流行和远程治疗等全球危机时期,TSD的潜在风险和益处知之甚少。我们检查了两个独立的治疗师样本(N = 1705年;研究1)和患者(N = 772;研究2)在新冠肺炎大流行早期(2020年春季)向远程治疗过渡期间,他们对TSD增加的看法。大约20%的治疗师和14%的患者报告称TSD明显增加。治疗师TSD增加的主要原因是治疗师的痛苦加剧以及在远程治疗中与患者建立联系的努力。重要的是,治疗师对TSD增加的感知与主观替代创伤、真实关系、心理动力学理论取向呈正相关,与人文主义取向呈负相关,但与年龄、种族/民族、临床经验长度、工作联盟或职业自我怀疑无关。患者对TSD增加的感知与患者疫情相关的创伤困扰和他们自己的自我揭露呈正相关,但与患者报告的治疗关系变量无关。从纵向上看,在控制了基线创伤痛苦和其他变量后,患者对TSD增加的感知预测在3个月的随访中与大流行相关的创伤痛苦更高。这些结果强调,在全球危机和向远程治疗过渡期间,远程治疗中TSD的增加可能是患者和治疗师痛苦加剧的潜在标志。研究结果还对比了文献,并强调治疗师(但可能不是患者)可能认为TSD的增加反映了真正的治疗联系。
{"title":"Therapist self-disclosure in teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with real relationship and traumatic distress","authors":"Xiaochen Luo,&nbsp;Katie Aafjes-van Doorn,&nbsp;Vera Békés,&nbsp;Tracy A. Prout,&nbsp;Leon Hoffman","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2915","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2915","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The usefulness of therapists' self-disclosure (TSD) in psychotherapy remains controversial, and little is known regarding the potential risks and benefits of TSD in times of global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic and in teletherapy. We examined two independent samples of therapists (<i>N</i> = 1705; Study 1) and patients (<i>N</i> = 772; Study 2) on their perceptions of increases in TSD during the transition to teletherapy early in the COVID-19 pandemic (spring 2020). Approximately 20% of therapists and 14% of patients reported perceptions of definite increases in TSD. Therapists' top reasons for increased TSD were therapists' heightened distress and an effort to connect with patients in teletherapy. Importantly, therapist perceptions of their increased TSD were positively related to subjective vicarious trauma, real relationship, psychodynamic theoretical orientation and negatively with humanistic orientation, but not with age, race/ethnicity, length of clinical experience, working alliance, or professional self-doubt. Patients' perceptions of increased TSD were positively related with patient pandemic-related traumatic distress and their own self-disclosure, but not with patient-reported therapeutic relationship variables. Longitudinally, patients' perceptions of TSD increases predicted higher pandemic-related traumatic distress at 3-month follow-up, after controlling for their baseline traumatic distress and other variables. These results highlighted that increased TSD in teletherapy may be a potential marker for heightened distress in both patients and therapists during a global crisis and a transition to teletherapy. The findings also contrasted the literature and emphasized that therapists, but perhaps not patients, may have considered increased TSD as a reflection of genuine therapeutic connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41101668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the validity and reliability of the International Anxiety Questionnaire and the International Depression Questionnaire in two bereaved national samples 评估国际焦虑问卷和国际抑郁问卷在两个丧亲国家样本中的有效性和可靠性。
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2917
Philip Hyland, Enya Redican, Thanos Karatzias, Mark Shevlin

The International Anxiety Questionnaire (IAQ) and International Depression Questionnaire (IDQ) are self-report measures of ICD-11 Generalized Anxiety Disorder (ICD-11 GAD) and ICD-11 Single Episode Depressive Disorder (ICD-11 DD). This study tested the psychometric properties of these scales in two samples of bereaved adults from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the combined dimensionality and measurement invariance of the IAQ and IDQ across the United Kingdom (n = 1012) and Irish (n = 1011) samples. Differential item functioning (DIF) was tested using multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) modelling while convergent validity was also assessed. CFA results supported a correlated two-factor model in both samples. The MIMIC model showed that the IDQ item “Had recurrent thoughts of death or suicide” showed DIF and the effect was small. Internal reliability of the scales were high and convergent validity was supported. The prevalence of ICD-11 GAD was 18.6% and 16.1% and ICD-11 DD was 13.8% and 10.5% in the United Kingdom and Irish samples, respectively. Findings of the study provide support for the validity, measurement invariance, and reliability of the IAQ and IDQ among two bereaved national samples.

国际焦虑问卷(IAQ)和国际抑郁问卷(IDQ)是ICD-11广泛性焦虑症(ICD-11-GAD)和ICD-11单发作性抑郁障碍(ICD-11DD)的自我报告量表。这项研究在来自英国和爱尔兰共和国的两个丧亲成年人样本中测试了这些量表的心理测量特性。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于测试英国IAQ和IDQ的组合维度和测量不变性(n = 1012)和爱尔兰语(n = 1011)个样本。使用多指标多原因(MIMIC)模型测试差异项目功能(DIF),同时评估收敛有效性。CFA结果支持两个样本中的相关双因素模型。MIMIC模型显示,IDQ项目“有反复的死亡或自杀念头”显示DIF,且影响较小。量表的内部信度较高,并支持收敛有效性。英国和爱尔兰样本中ICD-11 GAD的患病率分别为18.6%和16.1%,ICD-11 DD的患病率为13.8%和10.5%。研究结果为两个丧亲国家样本的IAQ和IDQ的有效性、测量不变性和可靠性提供了支持。
{"title":"Assessing the validity and reliability of the International Anxiety Questionnaire and the International Depression Questionnaire in two bereaved national samples","authors":"Philip Hyland,&nbsp;Enya Redican,&nbsp;Thanos Karatzias,&nbsp;Mark Shevlin","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2917","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2917","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The International Anxiety Questionnaire (IAQ) and International Depression Questionnaire (IDQ) are self-report measures of ICD-11 Generalized Anxiety Disorder (ICD-11 GAD) and ICD-11 Single Episode Depressive Disorder (ICD-11 DD). This study tested the psychometric properties of these scales in two samples of bereaved adults from the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the combined dimensionality and measurement invariance of the IAQ and IDQ across the United Kingdom (<i>n</i> = 1012) and Irish (<i>n</i> = 1011) samples. Differential item functioning (DIF) was tested using multiple indicator multiple cause (MIMIC) modelling while convergent validity was also assessed. CFA results supported a correlated two-factor model in both samples. The MIMIC model showed that the IDQ item “Had recurrent thoughts of death or suicide” showed DIF and the effect was small. Internal reliability of the scales were high and convergent validity was supported. The prevalence of ICD-11 GAD was 18.6% and 16.1% and ICD-11 DD was 13.8% and 10.5% in the United Kingdom and Irish samples, respectively. Findings of the study provide support for the validity, measurement invariance, and reliability of the IAQ and IDQ among two bereaved national samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2917","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41107611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of ‘not just right experiences’ in obsessive–compulsive disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders and non-clinical controls in China 中国强迫症、焦虑和抑郁障碍患者与非临床对照组“不仅仅是正确的经历”的比较。
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2916
Lijuan Yang, Daning Chen, Xiaodong Zhang, Fangfang Huang, Zhanjiang Li, Xiangyun Yang

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of ‘not just right experiences’ (NJREs) in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety disorders (ADs) or major depressive disorder (MDD), compared with those of healthy controls (HCs).

Method

One hundred adults with OCD, 86 adults with ADs, 57 adults with MDD and 60 HCs were enrolled in the study. The Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire Revised (NJRE-QR), Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms in patients with OCD, ADs or MDD. The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) was used to evaluate OC beliefs in the OCD patients. The HCs only received assessment using the NJRE-QR. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA) were performed to compare the NJREs scores across the groups, while Pearson correlation and partial correlation analyses were used to examine the association between NJREs and other clinical features. The contribution of NJREs to predict OC symptoms was determined by multiple stratified linear regression.

Results

Individuals with OCD had significantly higher scores for the number of NJREs than ADs, but not MDD. The severity of NJREs was also significantly higher in patients with OCD than those with MDD or ADs (F = 5.23 and F = 19.79, respectively, P < 0.01). All the clinical scores in the NJRE-QR were significantly higher than those in the HC group. The number and severity of NJREs correlated significantly with the Y-BOCS total score (r = 0.29 and r = 0.39, respectively, P < 0.01). NJREs showed an independent contribution to OC symptoms, which alone explained 8% of the variation (F = 16.49, ΔR2 = 0.08; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

NJREs are related closely to OC symptoms, with their severity discriminating between OCD patients and those with ADs or MDD. NJREs were more specific for OCD in the Chinese population and are therefore worthy of further study in the future.

目的:本研究旨在探讨强迫症(OCD)、焦虑症(AD)或重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者与健康对照组(HC)患者的“不只是正确体验”(NJREs)特征。采用不只是正确的经历问卷修订版(NJE-QR)、Yale-Brown强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)、Beck抑郁量表(BDI)和Beck焦虑量表(BAI)评估强迫症、AD或MDD患者的临床症状。强迫症患者使用强迫症信念问卷44(OBQ-44)评估强迫症患者的强迫症信念。HC仅接受了使用NJRE-QR的评估。方差分析(ANOVA)和协方差分析(ANCOVA)用于比较各组的NJRE评分,而Pearson相关和偏相关分析用于检查NJRE与其他临床特征之间的相关性。NJRE对OC症状的预测作用通过多元分层线性回归确定。结果:强迫症患者的NJRE数量得分明显高于AD,但MDD得分不高。强迫症患者的NJRE严重程度也显著高于MDD或AD患者(F = 5.23和F = 分别为19.79,P 2. = 0.08;P 结论:NJREs与强迫症症状密切相关,其严重程度可区分强迫症患者和AD或MDD患者。NJRE在中国人群中对强迫症更具特异性,因此值得未来进一步研究。
{"title":"A comparison of ‘not just right experiences’ in obsessive–compulsive disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders and non-clinical controls in China","authors":"Lijuan Yang,&nbsp;Daning Chen,&nbsp;Xiaodong Zhang,&nbsp;Fangfang Huang,&nbsp;Zhanjiang Li,&nbsp;Xiangyun Yang","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2916","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2916","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of ‘not just right experiences’ (NJREs) in patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety disorders (ADs) or major depressive disorder (MDD), compared with those of healthy controls (HCs).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One hundred adults with OCD, 86 adults with ADs, 57 adults with MDD and 60 HCs were enrolled in the study. The Not Just Right Experiences Questionnaire Revised (NJRE-QR), Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms in patients with OCD, ADs or MDD. The Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44) was used to evaluate OC beliefs in the OCD patients. The HCs only received assessment using the NJRE-QR. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance (ANCOVA) were performed to compare the NJREs scores across the groups, while Pearson correlation and partial correlation analyses were used to examine the association between NJREs and other clinical features. The contribution of NJREs to predict OC symptoms was determined by multiple stratified linear regression.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Individuals with OCD had significantly higher scores for the number of NJREs than ADs, but not MDD. The severity of NJREs was also significantly higher in patients with OCD than those with MDD or ADs (<i>F</i> = 5.23 and <i>F</i> = 19.79, respectively, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). All the clinical scores in the NJRE-QR were significantly higher than those in the HC group. The number and severity of NJREs correlated significantly with the Y-BOCS total score (<i>r</i> = 0.29 and <i>r</i> = 0.39, respectively, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). NJREs showed an independent contribution to OC symptoms, which alone explained 8% of the variation (<i>F</i> = 16.49, Δ<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>NJREs are related closely to OC symptoms, with their severity discriminating between OCD patients and those with ADs or MDD. NJREs were more specific for OCD in the Chinese population and are therefore worthy of further study in the future.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41093684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early maladaptive schemas, emotion regulation difficulties and alexithymia: A systematic review and meta-analysis 早期适应不良图式、情绪调节困难和述情障碍:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2914
Pamela D. Pilkington, Gery C. Karantzas, Bruno Faustino, Elizabeth Pizarro-Campagna

Background

Emotion regulation is an integral part of the schema therapy model. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the associations between early maladaptive schemas (EMSs), difficulties with emotion regulation and alexithymia.

Method

PsycINFO, PubMed and CINAHL Complete databases were searched on 28 May 2022 and 3 February 2023 in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Included studies were in English, in peer-reviewed journals and reported on the association between one or more of the 18 EMSs or five schema domains and emotion regulation difficulties or alexithymia. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analyses were conducted to examine difficulties with emotion regulation and alexithymia as correlates of each EMS and domain.

Results

A total of 19 studies published between 2008 and 2022 were included (Pooled N = 5957). Difficulties with emotion regulation were positively correlated with all 18 EMSs (range: entitlement r(7) = .28, 95% CI [.13, .42] to negativity pessimism r(5) = .53, 95% CI [.23, .74]) and schema domains (range: impaired limits r(5) = .34, 95% CI [.08, .56] to disconnection rejection r(5) = .44, 95% CI [.33, .73]). Alexithymia was positively correlated with the other-directedness domain (r(2) = .40, 95% CI [.09, .64]) and 16 of the 18 EMSs (range: unrelenting standards r(5) = .21, 95% CI [.12, .28] to emotional inhibition r(5) = .50, 95% CI [.34, .63]).

Conclusions

The findings suggested that almost all 18 EMSs are implicated in emotion regulation difficulties and alexithymia, particularly those relating to unmet needs for attachment and autonomy.

背景:情绪调节是图式治疗模式的一个组成部分。这项系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是综合早期适应不良图式(EMS)、情绪调节困难和述情障碍之间关系的证据。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,于2022年5月28日和2023年2月3日搜索PsycINFO、PubMed和CINAHL完整数据库。纳入的研究是英文的,发表在同行评审的期刊上,并报道了18个EMS中的一个或多个或五个图式域与情绪调节困难或述情障碍之间的关系。使用横断面研究评估工具对方法学质量进行了评估。进行荟萃分析,以检查情绪调节困难和述情障碍作为每个EMS和领域的相关性。结果:2008年至2022年间共发表了19项研究(汇总N= 5957)。情绪调节困难与所有18个EMS呈正相关(范围:权利r(7) =.28,95%置信区间[13,.42]对消极悲观主义r(5) =.53,95%置信区间[23,.74])和模式域(范围:受损极限r(5) =.34,95%CI[0.08,.56]至断开拒绝r(5) =.44,95%CI[0.33,.73])。述情障碍与其他定向域呈正相关(r(2) =.40,95%CI[0.9,.64])和18个EMS中的16个(范围:无情的标准r(5) =.21,95%CI[0.12,.28]对情绪抑制r(5) =.50,95%可信区间[34,.63])。结论:研究结果表明,几乎所有18个EMS都与情绪调节困难和述情障碍有关,尤其是与依恋和自主需求未得到满足有关的。
{"title":"Early maladaptive schemas, emotion regulation difficulties and alexithymia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Pamela D. Pilkington,&nbsp;Gery C. Karantzas,&nbsp;Bruno Faustino,&nbsp;Elizabeth Pizarro-Campagna","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2914","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2914","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Emotion regulation is an integral part of the schema therapy model. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on the associations between early maladaptive schemas (EMSs), difficulties with emotion regulation and alexithymia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>PsycINFO, PubMed and CINAHL Complete databases were searched on 28 May 2022 and 3 February 2023 in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Included studies were in English, in peer-reviewed journals and reported on the association between one or more of the 18 EMSs or five schema domains and emotion regulation difficulties or alexithymia. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Meta-analyses were conducted to examine difficulties with emotion regulation and alexithymia as correlates of each EMS and domain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A total of 19 studies published between 2008 and 2022 were included (Pooled <i>N</i> = 5957). Difficulties with emotion regulation were positively correlated with all 18 EMSs (range: entitlement <i>r</i>(7) = .28, 95% CI [.13, .42] to negativity pessimism <i>r</i>(5) = .53, 95% CI [.23, .74]) and schema domains (range: impaired limits <i>r</i>(5) = .34, 95% CI [.08, .56] to disconnection rejection <i>r</i>(5) = .44, 95% CI [.33, .73]). Alexithymia was positively correlated with the other-directedness domain (<i>r</i>(2) = .40, 95% CI [.09, .64]) and 16 of the 18 EMSs (range: unrelenting standards <i>r</i>(5) = .21, 95% CI [.12, .28] to emotional inhibition <i>r</i>(5) = .50, 95% CI [.34, .63]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The findings suggested that almost all 18 EMSs are implicated in emotion regulation difficulties and alexithymia, particularly those relating to unmet needs for attachment and autonomy.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2914","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41154578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In search of hidden threats: A scoping review on paranoid presentations in personality disorders 寻找隐藏的威胁:人格障碍中偏执表现的范围综述。
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2913
Erika Fanti, Marco Di Sarno, Rossella Di Pierro

Recent diagnostic developments suggest that paranoia is a transdiagnostic characteristic common to several personality disorders rather than a personality disorder per se. Nonetheless, empirical literature fails to provide comprehensive and univocal findings on whether and how paranoid presentations relate to different personality disorders. In the present scoping review, we map the empirical literature on paranoid presentations in personality disorders, considering the entire spectrum of paranoid manifestations (i.e., the paranoia hierarchy). In selecting original quantitative studies on paranoid presentations in personality-disordered patients, we screened 4,433 records in PsycArticles, PsycInfo and PUBMED. We eventually included 47 eligible studies in the review. Our synthesis indicates consistent empirical evidence of a wide range of paranoid presentations in Paranoid, Schizotypal and Borderline personality disorders. Conversely, little empirical literature exists on paranoid presentations in other personality disorders. Preliminary findings suggest broad-severity paranoid presentations, ranging from milder to severe forms, in Paranoid, Schizotypal and Borderline personality disorders. There is also some evidence of milder forms of paranoia in Avoidant, Antisocial and Narcissistic personality disorders. Conversely, there is poor evidence of paranoid presentations in Schizoid, Histrionic, Dependent or Obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. Research gaps and recommendations for improving empirical research on paranoid presentations in personality disorders are discussed.

最近的诊断发展表明,偏执是几种人格障碍常见的跨诊断特征,而不是人格障碍本身。尽管如此,实证文献未能就偏执表现是否以及如何与不同的人格障碍相关提供全面而单一的发现。在本范围界定综述中,我们绘制了关于人格障碍中偏执表现的实证文献,考虑了偏执表现的整个光谱(即偏执等级)。在选择关于人格障碍患者偏执表现的原始定量研究时,我们在PsycArticles、PsycInfo和PUBMED中筛选了4433条记录。我们最终将47项符合条件的研究纳入审查。我们的综合表明,在偏执狂、分裂型和边缘型人格障碍中,有广泛的偏执表现,这是一致的经验证据。相反,关于其他人格障碍中偏执表现的实证文献很少。初步发现表明,偏执狂、分裂型和边缘型人格障碍表现为广泛严重的偏执症状,从轻度到重度不等。还有一些证据表明,在回避型、反社会型和自恋型人格障碍中存在较温和形式的偏执狂。相反,在精神分裂症、表演性、依赖性或强迫性人格障碍中,偏执表现的证据很少。讨论了研究空白和改进人格障碍中偏执表现实证研究的建议。
{"title":"In search of hidden threats: A scoping review on paranoid presentations in personality disorders","authors":"Erika Fanti,&nbsp;Marco Di Sarno,&nbsp;Rossella Di Pierro","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2913","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2913","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent diagnostic developments suggest that paranoia is a transdiagnostic characteristic common to several personality disorders rather than a personality disorder per se. Nonetheless, empirical literature fails to provide comprehensive and univocal findings on whether and how paranoid presentations relate to different personality disorders. In the present scoping review, we map the empirical literature on paranoid presentations in personality disorders, considering the entire spectrum of paranoid manifestations (i.e., the paranoia hierarchy). In selecting original quantitative studies on paranoid presentations in personality-disordered patients, we screened 4,433 records in PsycArticles, PsycInfo and PUBMED. We eventually included 47 eligible studies in the review. Our synthesis indicates consistent empirical evidence of a wide range of paranoid presentations in Paranoid, Schizotypal and Borderline personality disorders. Conversely, little empirical literature exists on paranoid presentations in other personality disorders. Preliminary findings suggest broad-severity paranoid presentations, ranging from milder to severe forms, in Paranoid, Schizotypal and Borderline personality disorders. There is also some evidence of milder forms of paranoia in Avoidant, Antisocial and Narcissistic personality disorders. Conversely, there is poor evidence of paranoid presentations in Schizoid, Histrionic, Dependent or Obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. Research gaps and recommendations for improving empirical research on paranoid presentations in personality disorders are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 6","pages":"1215-1233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41106535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a compassion-based cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem in sexual minority young adults 以同情为基础的认知行为干预对性少数群体青年自卑的可接受性、可行性和初步疗效
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2911
Livia Bridge, Katie Langford, Katrina McMullen, Lovedeep Rai, Patrick Smith, Katharine A. Rimes

Low self-esteem can impair daily functioning and is a risk or maintenance factor for several mental health problems. Sexual minority young adults, for example, those identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual, on average have lower self-esteem than their heterosexual peers. Compassion-based interventions for low self-esteem might be especially beneficial for sexual minority young adults, whose higher levels of shame and self-criticism are likely to be contributing to maintenance of their low self-esteem. This study explored the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a new compassion-based cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem tailored to sexual minority young adults. Participants were a community sample of 24 sexual minority young adults aged 16–24 experiencing clinically significant low self-esteem. An uncontrolled pre-/post-design was used with qualitative feedback and quantitative outcomes. Self-report standardised measures were completed at baseline, pre-intervention, intervention mid-point, post-intervention and 2-month follow up. Preliminary efficacy was examined through post-intervention changes in self-esteem, functioning, anxiety and depression. Potential mechanisms of change were examined through changes in self-compassion, self-criticism and unhelpful coping responses to minority stress. Results showed good acceptability and feasibility and preliminary evidence of intervention efficacy for improving self-esteem, functioning, depression and anxiety. There was evidence for improvement in self-compassion and reduction in self-criticism, and these constructs could be investigated in future studies as treatment mediators. Randomised controlled studies are needed to further examine efficacy of the intervention.

低自尊会影响日常功能,也是多种心理健康问题的风险或维持因素。性少数群体的年轻人,例如那些被认定为女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋的人,平均自尊心低于异性恋同龄人。以同情为基础的自卑干预措施可能对性少数群体的年轻人特别有益,因为他们的羞耻感和自我批评水平较高,很可能导致他们的自卑感持续存在。本研究探讨了针对性少数群体青壮年的新的以同情为基础的自卑认知行为干预的可接受性、可行性和初步疗效。研究对象是 24 名年龄在 16-24 岁之间、在临床上有明显自卑感的性少数群体年轻人。该研究采用了非控制性的前后设计,包括定性反馈和定量结果。在基线、干预前、干预中期、干预后和 2 个月的随访中完成自我报告标准化测量。通过干预后自尊、功能、焦虑和抑郁方面的变化来检验初步效果。通过自我同情、自我批评和对少数群体压力的无益应对措施的变化,对潜在的变化机制进行了研究。结果表明,干预的可接受性和可行性良好,并有初步证据表明干预对改善自尊、功能、抑郁和焦虑有效果。有证据表明,自我同情有所改善,自我批评有所减少,在今后的研究中可以将这些因素作为治疗的中介因素进行调查。需要进行随机对照研究,以进一步考察干预的效果。
{"title":"Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a compassion-based cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem in sexual minority young adults","authors":"Livia Bridge,&nbsp;Katie Langford,&nbsp;Katrina McMullen,&nbsp;Lovedeep Rai,&nbsp;Patrick Smith,&nbsp;Katharine A. Rimes","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2911","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2911","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low self-esteem can impair daily functioning and is a risk or maintenance factor for several mental health problems. Sexual minority young adults, for example, those identifying as lesbian, gay or bisexual, on average have lower self-esteem than their heterosexual peers. Compassion-based interventions for low self-esteem might be especially beneficial for sexual minority young adults, whose higher levels of shame and self-criticism are likely to be contributing to maintenance of their low self-esteem. This study explored the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a new compassion-based cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem tailored to sexual minority young adults. Participants were a community sample of 24 sexual minority young adults aged 16–24 experiencing clinically significant low self-esteem. An uncontrolled pre-/post-design was used with qualitative feedback and quantitative outcomes. Self-report standardised measures were completed at baseline, pre-intervention, intervention mid-point, post-intervention and 2-month follow up. Preliminary efficacy was examined through post-intervention changes in self-esteem, functioning, anxiety and depression. Potential mechanisms of change were examined through changes in self-compassion, self-criticism and unhelpful coping responses to minority stress. Results showed good acceptability and feasibility and preliminary evidence of intervention efficacy for improving self-esteem, functioning, depression and anxiety. There was evidence for improvement in self-compassion and reduction in self-criticism, and these constructs could be investigated in future studies as treatment mediators. Randomised controlled studies are needed to further examine efficacy of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2911","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10233367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conceptualizing multiplicity spectrum experiences: A systematic review and thematic synthesis 多重频谱经验的概念化:系统回顾和专题综合
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2910
Zarah Eve, Kim Heyes, Sarah Parry

Background

Dissociative identity disorder and depersonalization–derealization have attracted research and clinical interest, facilitating greater understanding. However, little is known about the experience of multiplicity of self outside of traumagenic or illness constructs. Consequently, this systematic review explored how people identifying as having multiple selves conceptualize their experiences and identity.

Methods

A comprehensive search of qualitative studies reporting lived experiences of multiplicity was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021258555). Thirteen relevant studies were retrieved (N = 98, 16–64 years, conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States, Hungary and Poland).

Results

Using line-by-line thematic synthesis, four analytical themes were developed: multiplicity: disorder versus experience; impact of understanding multiplicity; importance of supporting multiplicity; and continuum of experiences.

Discussion

This review highlights heterogeneity within multiplicity-spectrum experiences, emphasizing the need for person-centred, individualized understanding, separate from mental health conceptualizations. Therefore, training in person-centred individualized care to promote self-concept clarity is needed across health, education and social care. This systematic review is the first to synthesize voices of people with lived experience across the multiplicity spectrum, demonstrating how qualitative research can contribute to advancing our understanding of this complex phenomena with the community, acknowledging reciprocal psychosocial impacts of multiplicity and providing valuable recommendations for services.

背景 解离性身份识别障碍和人格解体-去人格化引起了研究和临床的兴趣,并促进了人们对这两种疾病的进一步了解。然而,人们对创伤或疾病之外的多重自我体验知之甚少。因此,本系统性综述探讨了被认定为拥有多重自我的人是如何将其经历和身份概念化的。 方法 通过 PsycINFO、PubMed 和 Scopus(PROSPERO ID:CRD42021258555)对报告多重性生活体验的定性研究进行了全面检索。共检索到 13 项相关研究(N = 98,16-64 岁,在英国、美国、匈牙利和波兰进行)。 结果 通过逐行主题综合,形成了四个分析主题:多重性:失调与经验;理解多重性的影响;支持多重性的重要性;以及经验的连续性。 讨论 本综述强调了多重性体验中的异质性,强调了以人为本、个性化理解的必要性,并将其与心理健康概念区分开来。因此,需要在医疗、教育和社会护理领域开展以人为本的个性化护理培训,以促进自我概念的清晰。本系统性综述首次综合了具有多重性生活经历者的声音,展示了定性研究如何有助于我们与社区一起加深对这一复杂现象的理解,承认多重性对社会心理的相互影响,并为服务提供有价值的建议。
{"title":"Conceptualizing multiplicity spectrum experiences: A systematic review and thematic synthesis","authors":"Zarah Eve,&nbsp;Kim Heyes,&nbsp;Sarah Parry","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2910","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2910","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Dissociative identity disorder and depersonalization–derealization have attracted research and clinical interest, facilitating greater understanding. However, little is known about the experience of multiplicity of self outside of traumagenic or illness constructs. Consequently, this systematic review explored how people identifying as having multiple selves conceptualize their experiences and identity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A comprehensive search of qualitative studies reporting lived experiences of multiplicity was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021258555). Thirteen relevant studies were retrieved (<i>N</i> = 98, 16–64 years, conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States, Hungary and Poland).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using line-by-line thematic synthesis, four analytical themes were developed: multiplicity: disorder versus experience; impact of understanding multiplicity; importance of supporting multiplicity; and continuum of experiences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This review highlights heterogeneity within multiplicity-spectrum experiences, emphasizing the need for person-centred, individualized understanding, separate from mental health conceptualizations. Therefore, training in person-centred individualized care to promote self-concept clarity is needed across health, education and social care. This systematic review is the first to synthesize voices of people with lived experience across the multiplicity spectrum, demonstrating how qualitative research can contribute to advancing our understanding of this complex phenomena with the community, acknowledging reciprocal psychosocial impacts of multiplicity and providing valuable recommendations for services.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2910","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10590212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anger treatment via CBAT delivered remotely: Outcomes on psychometric and self-monitored measures of anger 通过远程 CBAT 进行愤怒治疗:愤怒心理测量和自我监控测量的结果
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2907
Ephrem Fernandez, Brandon Perez, Renhao Sun, Krishna Kolaparthi, Tuan Pham, Emmanuel Iwuala, Rudy Garza, Eric C. Shattuck, Wenbo Wu

Studies of anger treatment have often reported on reappraisal and relaxation techniques delivered in person to forensic and psychiatric samples. The present study evaluated an integrative programme of cognitive–behavioural affective therapy (CBAT) delivered remotely to chronic pain sufferers with comorbid anger. Volunteers (N = 54) were randomly assigned to either CBAT or an Emotional Education (EE) group, both receiving hour-long videorecorded sessions twice a week for 4 weeks plus weekly calls by telephone. At 1-month post-treatment, follow-up was conducted. Outcomes were measured using the Anger Parameters Scale (APS) and its five subscales (frequency, duration, intensity, latency and threshold) as well as daily self-monitored anger logs. As hypothesized, pre- to post-treatment decline in APS total scores was significant for CBAT, Hedges' g = 0.65, 95% CI [0.14, 1.16] but nonsignificant and small for EE, g = 0.17, CI [−0.41, 0.75]. At the primary endpoint (post-treatment), APS total scores were significantly lower for CBAT than for EE. Treatment gains were maintained till follow-up. On all five APS subscales, pre-post effect sizes were medium-sized for CBAT and generally small for EE. This picture was mirrored in the self-monitored frequency, duration and intensity of anger. Findings support the efficacy of CBAT over time, its comparative efficacy over EE and its ecological generalizability. Future research could expand sample size, reduce sample imbalance, extend follow-up and strengthen treatment potency with more sessions. The present study renews enthusiasm for teletherapy and is the first to demonstrate CBAT efficacy in treating maladaptive anger in the chronic pain population.

有关愤怒治疗的研究通常是针对法医和精神病学样本,通过面对面的方式提供重新评估和放松技巧。本研究评估了一种认知行为情感疗法(CBAT)的综合方案,该方案通过远程方式提供给伴有愤怒情绪的慢性疼痛患者。志愿者(N = 54)被随机分配到 CBAT 或情绪教育(EE)小组,在为期 4 周的时间里,他们都会接受每周两次、每次一小时的视频录像治疗,以及每周一次的电话呼叫。治疗后 1 个月进行随访。结果采用愤怒参数量表(APS)及其五个分量表(频率、持续时间、强度、潜伏期和阈值)以及每日自我监控愤怒日志进行测量。正如假设的那样,从治疗前到治疗后,APS 总分的下降对 CBAT 有显著影响(Hedges' g = 0.65,95% CI [0.14,1.16]),但对 EE 则无显著影响,且下降幅度较小(g = 0.17,CI [-0.41,0.75])。在主要终点(治疗后),CBAT 的 APS 总分明显低于 EE。治疗效果一直保持到随访。在所有五个 APS 分量表中,CBAT 的治疗后前效应大小为中等,而 EE 的治疗后效应大小一般较小。这种情况也反映在自我监控的愤怒频率、持续时间和强度上。研究结果支持 CBAT 的长期有效性、与 EE 的比较有效性及其生态普适性。未来的研究可以扩大样本量,减少样本失衡,延长随访时间,并通过更多的疗程来增强治疗效果。本研究再次激发了人们对远程治疗的热情,并首次证明了 CBAT 在治疗慢性疼痛人群适应性愤怒方面的疗效。
{"title":"Anger treatment via CBAT delivered remotely: Outcomes on psychometric and self-monitored measures of anger","authors":"Ephrem Fernandez,&nbsp;Brandon Perez,&nbsp;Renhao Sun,&nbsp;Krishna Kolaparthi,&nbsp;Tuan Pham,&nbsp;Emmanuel Iwuala,&nbsp;Rudy Garza,&nbsp;Eric C. Shattuck,&nbsp;Wenbo Wu","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2907","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2907","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies of anger treatment have often reported on reappraisal and relaxation techniques delivered in person to forensic and psychiatric samples. The present study evaluated an integrative programme of cognitive–behavioural affective therapy (CBAT) delivered remotely to chronic pain sufferers with comorbid anger. Volunteers (<i>N</i> = 54) were randomly assigned to either CBAT or an Emotional Education (EE) group, both receiving hour-long videorecorded sessions twice a week for 4 weeks plus weekly calls by telephone. At 1-month post-treatment, follow-up was conducted. Outcomes were measured using the Anger Parameters Scale (APS) and its five subscales (frequency, duration, intensity, latency and threshold) as well as daily self-monitored anger logs. As hypothesized, pre- to post-treatment decline in APS total scores was significant for CBAT, Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.65, 95% CI [0.14, 1.16] but nonsignificant and small for EE, <i>g</i> = 0.17, CI [−0.41, 0.75]. At the primary endpoint (post-treatment), APS total scores were significantly lower for CBAT than for EE. Treatment gains were maintained till follow-up. On all five APS subscales, pre-post effect sizes were medium-sized for CBAT and generally small for EE. This picture was mirrored in the self-monitored frequency, duration and intensity of anger. Findings support the efficacy of CBAT over time, its comparative efficacy over EE and its ecological generalizability. Future research could expand sample size, reduce sample imbalance, extend follow-up and strengthen treatment potency with more sessions. The present study renews enthusiasm for teletherapy and is the first to demonstrate CBAT efficacy in treating maladaptive anger in the chronic pain population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10572130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Online versus in-person delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder: An examination of effectiveness 在线与面对面认知行为疗法治疗强迫症:有效性研究
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2908
Diana M. Lisi, Lance L. Hawley, Randi E. McCabe, Karen Rowa, Duncan H. Cameron, Margaret A. Richter, Neil A. Rector

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) including exposure and response prevention is the first-line psychological treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Given changes in the clinical landscape, there are increasing efforts to evaluate its effectiveness in online contexts. Mirroring the traditional in-person delivery, few studies have assessed the role of therapist-guided, manual-based CBT for OCD delivered in real-time via videoconferencing methods. The present study sought to fill this gap by comparing in-person and online delivery of group-based CBT for the treatment of OCD. A convenience sample of participants with moderate to severe OCD (n = 144) were recruited from a naturalistic database from two large OCD specialty assessment and treatment centres. Patients received group-based CBT that was provided in-person (pre-COVID-19 pandemic; March 2018 to March 2020) or online via videoconferencing (during the COVID-19 pandemic; March 2020 to April 2021). In both delivery methods, treatment consisted of 2-h weekly sessions led by trained clinicians. Analyses revealed that, regardless of treatment modality, both in-person and online groups demonstrated significant, reliable, and statistically equivalent improvements in OCD symptoms post-treatment. Videoconferenced, clinician-led CBT may be a promising alternative to in-person delivery for those with moderate to severe OCD symptoms.

包括暴露和反应预防在内的认知行为疗法(CBT)是强迫症(OCD)的一线心理治疗方法。鉴于临床环境的变化,越来越多的人致力于评估其在网络环境下的有效性。与传统的面对面治疗类似,很少有研究评估治疗师指导的、基于手册的 CBT 通过视频会议方法对强迫症进行实时治疗的作用。本研究试图通过比较治疗强迫症的基于小组的 CBT 的面对面授课和在线授课来填补这一空白。研究人员从两个大型强迫症专业评估和治疗中心的自然数据库中招募了中度至重度强迫症患者(n = 144)。患者接受了以小组为基础的 CBT 治疗,治疗方式为面对面治疗(COVID-19 大流行前;2018 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月)或通过视频会议进行在线治疗(COVID-19 大流行期间;2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 4 月)。在这两种治疗方法中,治疗均由训练有素的临床医生主持,每周进行 2 小时的治疗。分析表明,无论采用哪种治疗方式,面对面治疗组和在线治疗组在治疗后的强迫症症状都有显著、可靠和统计学上同等的改善。对于有中度至重度强迫症症状的患者来说,由临床医生指导的视频会议式 CBT 可能是一种很有前景的替代面对面治疗的方法。
{"title":"Online versus in-person delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive compulsive disorder: An examination of effectiveness","authors":"Diana M. Lisi,&nbsp;Lance L. Hawley,&nbsp;Randi E. McCabe,&nbsp;Karen Rowa,&nbsp;Duncan H. Cameron,&nbsp;Margaret A. Richter,&nbsp;Neil A. Rector","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2908","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2908","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) including exposure and response prevention is the first-line psychological treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Given changes in the clinical landscape, there are increasing efforts to evaluate its effectiveness in online contexts. Mirroring the traditional in-person delivery, few studies have assessed the role of therapist-guided, manual-based CBT for OCD delivered in real-time via videoconferencing methods. The present study sought to fill this gap by comparing in-person and online delivery of group-based CBT for the treatment of OCD. A convenience sample of participants with moderate to severe OCD (<i>n</i> = 144) were recruited from a naturalistic database from two large OCD specialty assessment and treatment centres. Patients received group-based CBT that was provided in-person (pre-COVID-19 pandemic; March 2018 to March 2020) or online via videoconferencing (during the COVID-19 pandemic; March 2020 to April 2021). In both delivery methods, treatment consisted of 2-h weekly sessions led by trained clinicians. Analyses revealed that, regardless of treatment modality, both in-person and online groups demonstrated significant, reliable, and statistically equivalent improvements in OCD symptoms post-treatment. Videoconferenced, clinician-led CBT may be a promising alternative to in-person delivery for those with moderate to severe OCD symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10589747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The emotionally exhausted treating the mentally unwell? A systematic review of burnout and stress interventions for psychologists 精神疲惫者治疗精神不健康者?对心理学家职业倦怠和压力干预措施的系统回顾
IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2909
Caitlin Bell, Genevieve L. R. Roberts, Prudence M. Millear, Andrew Allen, Andrew P. Wood, Lee Kannis-Dymand, Celine M. Jona, Jonathan Mason

Healthcare providers are at high risk of occupational burnout, which has negative implications on the individual, their profession, the organisation and their patients. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to the repercussions of burnout due to the emotionally draining nature and content of their work. However, research has failed to outline and evaluate effective interventions for burnout within the profession. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of burnout through a systematic literature review. Systematic searches of four databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. A total of 4832 articles were identified, and 15 were included in the final analysis. The search was limited to scholarly and peer-reviewed journals published in the English language, which measured and utilised a form of intervention for the treatment of burnout or stress and included participants within the psychology profession. Interventions identified included mindfulness, training courses, self-care and other therapy-based forms of interventions. Approximately 60% of study participants reported moderate to high levels of stress. Interventions were largely variable in modality, frequency and duration of sessions and follow-up period. Of the 15 studies included within the review, only four measured burnout as an outcome variable, while the others measured stress. Findings of this systematic review indicate that mindfulness-based interventions may be a starting point for reducing stress; however, the most effective intervention for psychologists who have reached burnout is largely unclear. It is recommended that future studies focus on the identification and measurement of burnout, are more rigorously designed and reported and consider peer-based online support approaches.

医疗服务提供者面临职业倦怠的高风险,这对个人、职业、组织和患者都会产生负面影响。心理学家由于其工作性质和内容耗费情绪,尤其容易受到职业倦怠的影响。然而,研究却未能概述和评估针对该行业职业倦怠的有效干预措施。本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述来调查职业倦怠的治疗效果。研究采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南对四个数据库进行了系统检索。共发现 4832 篇文章,其中 15 篇被纳入最终分析。搜索仅限于以英语出版的学术性同行评审期刊,这些期刊衡量并使用了某种形式的干预措施来治疗职业倦怠或压力,并包括心理学专业的参与者。所确定的干预措施包括正念、培训课程、自我保健和其他基于治疗的干预形式。约有 60% 的研究参与者表示有中度到高度的压力。干预的方式、频率、疗程和随访时间各不相同。在纳入综述的 15 项研究中,只有 4 项研究将职业倦怠作为结果变量进行了测量,而其他研究则对压力进行了测量。本系统综述的研究结果表明,以正念为基础的干预措施可能是减轻压力的一个起点;但是,对于已经达到职业倦怠的心理学家来说,最有效的干预措施在很大程度上还不明确。建议今后的研究重点关注职业倦怠的识别和测量,进行更严格的设计和报告,并考虑基于同伴的在线支持方法。
{"title":"The emotionally exhausted treating the mentally unwell? A systematic review of burnout and stress interventions for psychologists","authors":"Caitlin Bell,&nbsp;Genevieve L. R. Roberts,&nbsp;Prudence M. Millear,&nbsp;Andrew Allen,&nbsp;Andrew P. Wood,&nbsp;Lee Kannis-Dymand,&nbsp;Celine M. Jona,&nbsp;Jonathan Mason","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2909","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.2909","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthcare providers are at high risk of occupational burnout, which has negative implications on the individual, their profession, the organisation and their patients. Psychologists are particularly susceptible to the repercussions of burnout due to the emotionally draining nature and content of their work. However, research has failed to outline and evaluate effective interventions for burnout within the profession. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effectiveness of burnout through a systematic literature review. Systematic searches of four databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were conducted. A total of 4832 articles were identified, and 15 were included in the final analysis. The search was limited to scholarly and peer-reviewed journals published in the English language, which measured and utilised a form of intervention for the treatment of burnout or stress and included participants within the psychology profession. Interventions identified included mindfulness, training courses, self-care and other therapy-based forms of interventions. Approximately 60% of study participants reported moderate to high levels of stress. Interventions were largely variable in modality, frequency and duration of sessions and follow-up period. Of the 15 studies included within the review, only four measured burnout as an outcome variable, while the others measured stress. Findings of this systematic review indicate that mindfulness-based interventions may be a starting point for reducing stress; however, the most effective intervention for psychologists who have reached burnout is largely unclear. It is recommended that future studies focus on the identification and measurement of burnout, are more rigorously designed and reported and consider peer-based online support approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10199795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1