Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, Marina Verdaguer-Rodriguez, Marta Ferrer-Quintero, Roger Montserrat, Steffen Moritz, Paul Lysaker, Giancarlo Dimaggio, Carolina Palma-Sevillano, María Lamarca, Victoria Espinosa, Rabea Fischer, Marina Peniza-Soriano, Raquel López-Carrilero, Helena García-Mieres, Susana Ochoa
Impaired metacognition, the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states, has gained increasing attention in psychosis research. Different conceptualizations, psychological treatments and assessment methods have emerged; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate tools for clinical and research use. This systematic review had two aims: (1) to compile and organize available assessment tools and (2) to propose an index of metacognitive domains and processes. Instruments were categorized according to authorship, year of use in psychosis, outcomes assessed, language/version, administration time and type of Clinical Outcome Assessment (ClinRO, PRO or PerfO). We identified 42 studies that used 31 instruments. The tools were classified into four domains: Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Capacity, Neurometacognition and Social Metacognition. Our findings highlight the diversity of the available measures and propose a framework for aligning instruments with specific reflective processes. This work represents a practical and theoretical first step toward building consensus and facilitating both the use of available tools according to practical needs and the development of an agreed-upon definition and components of metacognition.
{"title":"The Assessment of Metacognition in Psychosis: Systematic Review and Future Lines of Research","authors":"Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, Marina Verdaguer-Rodriguez, Marta Ferrer-Quintero, Roger Montserrat, Steffen Moritz, Paul Lysaker, Giancarlo Dimaggio, Carolina Palma-Sevillano, María Lamarca, Victoria Espinosa, Rabea Fischer, Marina Peniza-Soriano, Raquel López-Carrilero, Helena García-Mieres, Susana Ochoa","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70223","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.70223","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Impaired metacognition, the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states, has gained increasing attention in psychosis research. Different conceptualizations, psychological treatments and assessment methods have emerged; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate tools for clinical and research use. This systematic review had two aims: (1) to compile and organize available assessment tools and (2) to propose an index of metacognitive domains and processes. Instruments were categorized according to authorship, year of use in psychosis, outcomes assessed, language/version, administration time and type of Clinical Outcome Assessment (ClinRO, PRO or PerfO). We identified 42 studies that used 31 instruments. The tools were classified into four domains: Metacognitive Awareness, Metacognitive Capacity, Neurometacognition and Social Metacognition. Our findings highlight the diversity of the available measures and propose a framework for aligning instruments with specific reflective processes. This work represents a practical and theoretical first step toward building consensus and facilitating both the use of available tools according to practical needs and the development of an agreed-upon definition and components of metacognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883341/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146141104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Childhood parental affection and abuse may shape vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) in adulthood through personal mastery and perceived constraints. This three-wave 18-year longitudinal study tested whether sense-of-control dimensions mediated the effects of early parental experiences on later GAD and MDD symptoms (N = 3294; 54.9% women; mean age = 45.6 years, SD = 11.4, range = 20–74 years; 89.7% White compared to African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American and other). Structural equation models showed that lower parental affection and higher abuse at Time 1 predicted greater perceived constraints at Time 2 (Cohen's d = −0.396 to 0.510), which in turn predicted greater GAD and MDD severity at Time 3 (d = 0.463 to 0.754). Perceived constraints significantly mediated the links between childhood parental experiences and adult symptom severity for both GAD (d = −0.269–0.319; percentage mediated: 30.0%–69.2%) and MDD (d = −0.343–0.422; 11.0%–44.9%), whereas mastery did not. Mediated effects were somewhat stronger for maternal (11.4%–69.2%) than paternal (11.0%–51.5%) experiences. These findings underscore perceived constraints as a critical mechanism linking childhood parental experiences to later anxiety and depression. Interventions that address maladaptive beliefs about sense of control may improve long-term outcomes for adults exposed to early adversity.
{"title":"When Childhood Control Slips Away: How Parental Affection and Abuse Shape Adult Anxiety and Depression","authors":"Chui Pin Soh, Kristin L. Szuhany, Nur Hani Zainal","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70232","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.70232","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Childhood parental affection and abuse may shape vulnerability to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) in adulthood through personal mastery and perceived constraints. This three-wave 18-year longitudinal study tested whether sense-of-control dimensions mediated the effects of early parental experiences on later GAD and MDD symptoms (<i>N</i> = 3294; 54.9% women; mean age = 45.6 years, <i>SD</i> = 11.4, range = 20–74 years; 89.7% White compared to African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native American and other). Structural equation models showed that lower parental affection and higher abuse at Time 1 predicted greater perceived constraints at Time 2 (Cohen's <i>d</i> = −0.396 to 0.510), which in turn predicted greater GAD and MDD severity at Time 3 (<i>d</i> = 0.463 to 0.754). Perceived constraints significantly mediated the links between childhood parental experiences and adult symptom severity for both GAD (<i>d</i> = −0.269–0.319; percentage mediated: 30.0%–69.2%) and MDD (<i>d</i> = −0.343–0.422; 11.0%–44.9%), whereas mastery did not. Mediated effects were somewhat stronger for maternal (11.4%–69.2%) than paternal (11.0%–51.5%) experiences. These findings underscore perceived constraints as a critical mechanism linking childhood parental experiences to later anxiety and depression. Interventions that address maladaptive beliefs about sense of control may improve long-term outcomes for adults exposed to early adversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12869133/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}