Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a complex disorder that, given the variety of its manifestations and the significant challenges related to its treatment, has attracted considerable attention from international scientific research. The present research aimed to investigate the centrality and the dynamics among the symptoms of NPD, based on the mental health professionals' perceptions. The research involved 376 mental health professionals, which evaluated the relative importance of diagnostic criteria for NPD outlined in Section II of the DSM-5-TR and the significance of maladaptive personality trait domains encompassed by Criterion B of Section III. Network analysis was then employed to analyse the collected data. Analysis of the NPD criteria network revealed two distinct symptom clusters related to the self and interpersonal dimensions of functioning. The need for admiration criterion emerged as a central node within this network. Furthermore, the network analysis concerning the domains confirmed the centrality of the antagonism domain in NPD. The findings of this study systematise the perspectives of mental health professionals using a network analysis approach to deepen our understanding of the core characteristics of NPD. These insights may offer valuable practical applications for both research and clinical practice, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and informing effective treatment strategies.
{"title":"DSM-5-TR Criteria and Domains for Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Evidence From Network Analysis Based on the Mental Health Professionals' Perspective","authors":"Alessio Gori, Eleonora Topino","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70179","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.70179","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a complex disorder that, given the variety of its manifestations and the significant challenges related to its treatment, has attracted considerable attention from international scientific research. The present research aimed to investigate the centrality and the dynamics among the symptoms of NPD, based on the mental health professionals' perceptions. The research involved 376 mental health professionals, which evaluated the relative importance of diagnostic criteria for NPD outlined in Section II of the DSM-5-TR and the significance of maladaptive personality trait domains encompassed by Criterion B of Section III. Network analysis was then employed to analyse the collected data. Analysis of the NPD criteria network revealed two distinct symptom clusters related to the self and interpersonal dimensions of functioning. The need for admiration criterion emerged as a central node within this network. Furthermore, the network analysis concerning the domains confirmed the centrality of the antagonism domain in NPD. The findings of this study systematise the perspectives of mental health professionals using a network analysis approach to deepen our understanding of the core characteristics of NPD. These insights may offer valuable practical applications for both research and clinical practice, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and informing effective treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70179","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145602587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah Stumpp, Alexander Wolber, Natascha Büchele, Leonie Lipinski, Stephanie N. L. Schmidt, Brigitte Rockstroh, Michael Odenwald, Daniela Mier
Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) tend towards riskier decision-making (DM). Yet the specificity of these findings, as well as the impact of impairments in executive functions (EF), has not been sufficiently clarified. In a preregistered study (https://osf.io/n7z6y) 40 SZ, 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed an n-back task (as EF challenge), the Game of Dice Task (GDT; DM under risk) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; DM under ambiguity). AUD and SZ performed worse than HC in the n-back task and riskier in the GDT. In the IGT, only AUD performed riskier than HC and preferred disadvantageous Deck B compared to SZ. However, controlling for demographics and IQ abolished significance. Correlations of performance in the GDT and IGT with working memory differed between groups. Taken together, both patient groups show a deficit in the reflective system, whereas only AUD show impairments in the impulsive system. Thus, the direct comparison of DM in SZ and AUD reveals a differential DM profile of SZ and AUD. Our results suggest that both groups may benefit from EF training, especially in planning, categorization and cognitive flexibility, whereas AUD could additionally profit from impulse control and inhibition training. However, the findings need replication with well-matched samples, and the link between EF and DM in SZ should be examined more carefully with experimental approaches.
{"title":"The Die Is Cast: Decision-Making Under Risk and Under Ambiguity in Schizophrenia and Alcohol Use Disorder","authors":"Sarah Stumpp, Alexander Wolber, Natascha Büchele, Leonie Lipinski, Stephanie N. L. Schmidt, Brigitte Rockstroh, Michael Odenwald, Daniela Mier","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70178","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpp.70178","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) tend towards riskier decision-making (DM). Yet the specificity of these findings, as well as the impact of impairments in executive functions (EF), has not been sufficiently clarified. In a preregistered study (https://osf.io/n7z6y) 40 SZ, 50 patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and 36 healthy controls (HC) completed an n-back task (as EF challenge), the Game of Dice Task (GDT; DM under risk) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; DM under ambiguity). AUD and SZ performed worse than HC in the n-back task and riskier in the GDT. In the IGT, only AUD performed riskier than HC and preferred disadvantageous Deck B compared to SZ. However, controlling for demographics and IQ abolished significance. Correlations of performance in the GDT and IGT with working memory differed between groups. Taken together, both patient groups show a deficit in the reflective system, whereas only AUD show impairments in the impulsive system. Thus, the direct comparison of DM in SZ and AUD reveals a differential DM profile of SZ and AUD. Our results suggest that both groups may benefit from EF training, especially in planning, categorization and cognitive flexibility, whereas AUD could additionally profit from impulse control and inhibition training. However, the findings need replication with well-matched samples, and the link between EF and DM in SZ should be examined more carefully with experimental approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70178","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145596118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}