Identity diffusion, involving a lack of cohesive personal identity, is a vulnerability factor in affective states—psychache and hopelessness—that often precede suicidality. Traumatic experiences, such as childhood emotional abuse, may limit the capacity to form a stable and coherent sense of self, thereby indirectly heightening the vulnerability to psychache and hopelessness through diffuse identity. The present study examined the relationship between identity diffusion and psychache and hopelessness, along with the indirect effect of perceived childhood emotional abuse. The sample (n = 297) comprised UK-based help-seeking adults recruited online. Eligible participants completed measures of identity diffusion, unbearable psychache, hopelessness and childhood emotional abuse at baseline, with psychache and hopelessness reassessed two months later. Regression analyses revealed that identity diffusion was significantly associated with both psychache and hopelessness over time, even after controlling for baseline levels. Mediation analysis further indicated that identity diffusion had a significant mediating effect on the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and later experiences of psychache and hopelessness. These findings underscore the importance of clinically targeting identity diffusion to help reduce presuicidal affective states, particularly among individuals who experience childhood emotional maltreatment.
{"title":"The Despair of Identity Diffusion: Associations With Psychache and Hopelessness and the Indirect Effect of Childhood Emotional Abuse","authors":"Angela Russolillo, Connor Hawkins, David Kealy","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70182","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identity diffusion, involving a lack of cohesive personal identity, is a vulnerability factor in affective states—psychache and hopelessness—that often precede suicidality. Traumatic experiences, such as childhood emotional abuse, may limit the capacity to form a stable and coherent sense of self, thereby indirectly heightening the vulnerability to psychache and hopelessness through diffuse identity. The present study examined the relationship between identity diffusion and psychache and hopelessness, along with the indirect effect of perceived childhood emotional abuse. The sample (<i>n</i> = 297) comprised UK-based help-seeking adults recruited online. Eligible participants completed measures of identity diffusion, unbearable psychache, hopelessness and childhood emotional abuse at baseline, with psychache and hopelessness reassessed two months later. Regression analyses revealed that identity diffusion was significantly associated with both psychache and hopelessness over time, even after controlling for baseline levels. Mediation analysis further indicated that identity diffusion had a significant mediating effect on the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and later experiences of psychache and hopelessness. These findings underscore the importance of clinically targeting identity diffusion to help reduce presuicidal affective states, particularly among individuals who experience childhood emotional maltreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70182","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), cognitive avoidance (CA), positive beliefs about worry (PBW) and a tendency to view everyday problems as threats, termed negative problem orientation (NPO), are cognitive vulnerabilities associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults, with fewer studies examining all four vulnerabilities in youth. In this study, validated measures of IU, CA, PBW and NPO were administered to clinically referred youth with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD, n = 86), anxiety disorders (n = 80) or major depression (n = 18) and to non-clinical peers (n = 46). Group differences and the contribution of each vulnerability to internalizing symptom domains were examined. The OCD and anxiety groups did not differ significantly from each other on any vulnerability but had higher scores than non-clinical peers on all vulnerabilities except PBW. Alongside age and sex, IU, CA, PBW and NPO accounted for 52% of the variance in generalized anxiety symptoms, 51% in depression, 48% in panic, 31% in obsessions/compulsions, 29% in separation anxiety and 18% in social anxiety. Structural modelling revealed that IU was associated with all anxiety symptom domains and that NPO was most strongly associated with depression. These findings suggest that IU, CA, PBW and NPO are linked to various internalizing symptom domains in youth and that IU and NPO act as transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and may be important treatment targets.
对不确定性的不容忍(IU)、认知回避(CA)、对担忧的积极信念(PBW)以及将日常问题视为威胁的倾向(称为消极问题取向(NPO))是与成人焦虑和抑郁症状相关的认知脆弱性,对青少年所有四种脆弱性的研究较少。在这项研究中,对主要诊断为强迫症(OCD, n = 86)、焦虑症(n = 80)或重度抑郁症(n = 18)的临床转诊青年和非临床同龄人(n = 46)进行了IU、CA、PBW和NPO的有效测量。小组差异和每个弱点的贡献内化症状域进行了检查。强迫症和焦虑组在任何脆弱性上没有显著差异,但在除PBW外的所有脆弱性上得分都高于非临床同龄人。除年龄和性别外,IU、CA、PBW和NPO在广泛性焦虑症状中占52%的变异,在抑郁症中占51%,在恐慌中占48%,在强迫/强迫中占31%,在分离焦虑中占29%,在社交焦虑中占18%。结构模型显示IU与所有焦虑症状域相关,而NPO与抑郁症的相关性最强。这些研究结果表明,IU、CA、PBW和NPO与青少年的各种内化症状域有关,IU和NPO作为跨诊断脆弱性,可能是重要的治疗靶点。
{"title":"Intolerance of Uncertainty, Cognitive Avoidance, Positive Beliefs About Worry and Negative Problem Orientation: Relevance to Anxiety Disorders, OCD and Depression in Youth","authors":"Matti Cervin, Per Andrén, Sean Perrin","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70184","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), cognitive avoidance (CA), positive beliefs about worry (PBW) and a tendency to view everyday problems as <i>threats</i>, termed negative problem orientation (NPO), are cognitive vulnerabilities associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults, with fewer studies examining all four vulnerabilities in youth. In this study, validated measures of IU, CA, PBW and NPO were administered to clinically referred youth with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD, <i>n</i> = 86), anxiety disorders (<i>n</i> = 80) or major depression (<i>n</i> = 18) and to non-clinical peers (<i>n</i> = 46). Group differences and the contribution of each vulnerability to internalizing symptom domains were examined. The OCD and anxiety groups did not differ significantly from each other on any vulnerability but had higher scores than non-clinical peers on all vulnerabilities except PBW. Alongside age and sex, IU, CA, PBW and NPO accounted for 52% of the variance in generalized anxiety symptoms, 51% in depression, 48% in panic, 31% in obsessions/compulsions, 29% in separation anxiety and 18% in social anxiety. Structural modelling revealed that IU was associated with all anxiety symptom domains and that NPO was most strongly associated with depression. These findings suggest that IU, CA, PBW and NPO are linked to various internalizing symptom domains in youth and that IU and NPO act as transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and may be important treatment targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70184","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yağızcan Kurt, Tobias Nolte, Patrick Luyten, Janet Feigenbaum, Brooks King-Casas, Judy Leibowitz, Steve Pilling, P. Read Montague, London Personality and Mood Disorder Research Network, Peter Fonagy
Insecure attachment is a well-established risk factor for the emergence of borderline personality features (BPF), encompassing identity disturbance, affective instability, problematic interpersonal relationships and self-harming behaviours. From a mentalizing-based perspective, BPF may develop through the interplay of hypomentalizing, defined as a reduced capacity to understand and reflect on one's own and others' mental states, and epistemic mistrust (EM), the diminished capacity to trust communicated information. Both processes are shaped by attachment anxiety and avoidance. However, research investigating the mechanisms linking attachment to BPF remains limited. This study examined the parallel mediating roles of hypomentalizing and EM in the associations between attachment dimensions and BPF. Data were drawn from a large combined clinical and community sample of 1129 participants (291 men, 819 women, 17 transgender individuals and 2 categorized as ‘other’; mean age = 32.88 years, SD = 10.90). Participants completed the Experiences in Close Relationships—Revised (ECR-R); the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire–54 (RFQ-54); the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ); and the Borderline Features Scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI-BOR). Parallel multiple mediation analyses indicated that both hypomentalizing and EM significantly mediated the relationships between (a) attachment anxiety and BPF and (b) attachment avoidance and BPF. Supplementary analyses showed that these pathways did not differ across diagnostic groups, but EM was expressed most strongly in those participants who met criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD), where it differentiated the group from clinical (depression and anxiety disorders) and community comparisons. These findings support the theoretical basis for mentalization-based interventions, highlighting the importance of improving mentalizing and reducing mistrust in communication to foster adaptive social learning. Nonetheless, the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-report measures limit causal inference and introduce potential bias. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to further evaluate the proposed model.
{"title":"Attachment and Borderline Personality Features: The Mediating Roles of Hypomentalizing and Epistemic Mistrust","authors":"Yağızcan Kurt, Tobias Nolte, Patrick Luyten, Janet Feigenbaum, Brooks King-Casas, Judy Leibowitz, Steve Pilling, P. Read Montague, London Personality and Mood Disorder Research Network, Peter Fonagy","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70185","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Insecure attachment is a well-established risk factor for the emergence of borderline personality features (BPF), encompassing identity disturbance, affective instability, problematic interpersonal relationships and self-harming behaviours. From a mentalizing-based perspective, BPF may develop through the interplay of hypomentalizing, defined as a reduced capacity to understand and reflect on one's own and others' mental states, and epistemic mistrust (EM), the diminished capacity to trust communicated information. Both processes are shaped by attachment anxiety and avoidance. However, research investigating the mechanisms linking attachment to BPF remains limited. This study examined the parallel mediating roles of hypomentalizing and EM in the associations between attachment dimensions and BPF. Data were drawn from a large combined clinical and community sample of 1129 participants (291 men, 819 women, 17 transgender individuals and 2 categorized as ‘other’; mean age = 32.88 years, SD = 10.90). Participants completed the Experiences in Close Relationships—Revised (ECR-R); the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire–54 (RFQ-54); the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ); and the Borderline Features Scale of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI-BOR). Parallel multiple mediation analyses indicated that both hypomentalizing and EM significantly mediated the relationships between (a) attachment anxiety and BPF and (b) attachment avoidance and BPF. Supplementary analyses showed that these pathways did not differ across diagnostic groups, but EM was expressed most strongly in those participants who met criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD), where it differentiated the group from clinical (depression and anxiety disorders) and community comparisons. These findings support the theoretical basis for mentalization-based interventions, highlighting the importance of improving mentalizing and reducing mistrust in communication to foster adaptive social learning. Nonetheless, the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-report measures limit causal inference and introduce potential bias. Future research should employ longitudinal designs to further evaluate the proposed model.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70185","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}