Clinical Infectious Diseases最新文献

Background: In 2019, the World Health Organization called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three 9-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded.

Results: Of 510 participants, 41% were women, the median age was 37 years (25th-75th percentile: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. A total of 399 (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% CI: 89-95%), 89% (95% CI: 80-94%), and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz, respectively. Clinically relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon.

Conclusions: All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.

In this prospective cohort of 2006 individuals with drug-susceptible tuberculosis in India, 18% had unfavorable treatment outcomes (4.7% treatment failure, 2.5% recurrent infection, 4.1% death, 6.8% loss to follow-up) over a median 12-month follow-up period. Age, male sex, low education, nutritional status, and alcohol use were predictors of unfavorable outcomes.

Background: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds.

Methods: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.

Results: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups.

Conclusions: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine.

Clinical trials registration: NCT05568797.

Background: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result.

Results: A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease.

Conclusions: Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.

Suppressive antibiotic therapy is prescribed when a patient has an infection that is presumed to be incurable by a defined course of therapy or source control. The cohort receiving suppressive antibiotic therapy is typically highly comorbid and the infections often involve retained prosthetic material. In part due to a lack of clear guidelines regarding the use of suppressive antibiotics, and in part due to the complex nature of the infections in question, patients are often prescribed suppressive antibiotics for extremely long, if not indefinite, courses. The risks of prolonged antibiotic exposure in this context are not fully characterized, but they include adverse drug effects ranging from mild to severe, the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, and perturbations of the gastrointestinal microbiome. In this narrative review we present the available evidence for the use of suppressive antibiotic therapy in 4 common indications, examine the gaps in the current literature, and explore the known and potential risks of this therapy. We also make suggestions for improving the quality of evidence in future studies, particularly by highlighting the need for a standardized term to describe the use of long courses of antibiotics to suppress hard-to-treat infections.

Background: Hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are important complications early (<30 days) after lung transplantation (LT). However, current incidence, associated factors, and outcomes are not well reported.

Methods: LT recipients transplanted at our institution (July 2019-January 2020 and October 2021-November 2022) were prospectively included. We assessed incidence and presentation of pneumonia and evaluated the impact of associated factors using regression models. We also evaluated molecular relatedness of respiratory pathogens collected peri-transplant and at pneumonia occurrence using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Results: In the first 30 days post-LT, 25/270 (9.3%) recipients were diagnosed with pneumonia (68% [17/25] VAP; 32% [8/25] HAP). Median time to pneumonia was 11 days (IQR, 7-13); 49% (132/270) of donor and 16% (44/270) of recipient respiratory peri-transplant cultures were positive. However, pathogens associated with pneumonia were not genetically related to either donor or recipient cultures at transplant, as determined by PFGE. Diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (HR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.62-12.08) and immunosuppression use (HR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.30-6.56) were pre-transplant factors associated with pneumonia. Pneumonia occurrence was associated with longer hospital stay (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 2.22-13.37) and VAP with longer ICU stay (HR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.73-10.75) within the first 30 days post-transplantation; 30- and 90-day mortality were similar.

Conclusions: Prospectively assessed early pneumonia incidence occurred in ∼10% of LT. Populations at increased risk for pneumonia occurrence include LT with pre-transplant pulmonary hypertension and pre-transplant immunosuppression. Pneumonia was associated with increased healthcare use, highlighting the need for further improvements by preferentially targeting higher-risk patients.