Besu F Teshome, Taehwan Park, Joel Arackal, Nicholas Hampton, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek
Background: Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed.
Findings: Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]).
Conclusions: De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.
{"title":"Preventing New Gram-negative Resistance Through Beta-lactam De-escalation in Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Besu F Teshome, Taehwan Park, Joel Arackal, Nicholas Hampton, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae253","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"826-833"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alison G C Smith, Michael E Yarrington, Arthur W Baker, Gary M Cox, Kristen V Dicks, John J Engemann, Patricia Kohler, Ahmad Mourad, Rasha Raslan, Wil L Santivasi, Nicholas A Turner, Rebekah H Wrenn, Sofia Zavala, Jason E Stout
Background: Infectious diseases (ID) physicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of caring for patients with terminal illnesses or incurable infections.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an ID consult within an academic health system from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2023, including community, general, and transplant ID consult services.
Results: There were 60 820 inpatient ID consults (17 235 community, 29 999 general, and 13 586 transplant) involving 37 848 unique patients. The number of consults increased by 94% and the rate rose from 5.0 to 9.9 consults per 100 inpatients (P < .001). In total, 7.5% of patients receiving an ID consult died during admission and 1006 (2.6%) of patients were discharged to hospice. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for community ID, 7.8% for general ID, and 10.7% for transplant ID patients (P < .001). Six-month mortality was 9% for all nonobstetric admissions versus 19% for community ID, 20.9% for general ID, and 22.3% for transplant ID. In total 2866 (7.6%) of all patients receiving ID consultation also received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization. The index ID consult preceded any palliative consult in the majority (69.5%) of cases. A total of 16.3% of patients had a do-not-resuscitate order during the index hospitalization; 12.2% of all patients with a do-not-resuscitate order had this placed on the same day as the ID consult.
Conclusions: Patients receiving ID consultation were increasingly complex and more likely to die soon after consultation. These results provide a framework for ID clinicians to consider their role in end-of-life care.
{"title":"Beyond Infection: Mortality and End-of-Life Care Associated With Infectious Disease Consultation in an Academic Health System.","authors":"Alison G C Smith, Michael E Yarrington, Arthur W Baker, Gary M Cox, Kristen V Dicks, John J Engemann, Patricia Kohler, Ahmad Mourad, Rasha Raslan, Wil L Santivasi, Nicholas A Turner, Rebekah H Wrenn, Sofia Zavala, Jason E Stout","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae325","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases (ID) physicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of caring for patients with terminal illnesses or incurable infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an ID consult within an academic health system from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2023, including community, general, and transplant ID consult services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 820 inpatient ID consults (17 235 community, 29 999 general, and 13 586 transplant) involving 37 848 unique patients. The number of consults increased by 94% and the rate rose from 5.0 to 9.9 consults per 100 inpatients (P < .001). In total, 7.5% of patients receiving an ID consult died during admission and 1006 (2.6%) of patients were discharged to hospice. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for community ID, 7.8% for general ID, and 10.7% for transplant ID patients (P < .001). Six-month mortality was 9% for all nonobstetric admissions versus 19% for community ID, 20.9% for general ID, and 22.3% for transplant ID. In total 2866 (7.6%) of all patients receiving ID consultation also received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization. The index ID consult preceded any palliative consult in the majority (69.5%) of cases. A total of 16.3% of patients had a do-not-resuscitate order during the index hospitalization; 12.2% of all patients with a do-not-resuscitate order had this placed on the same day as the ID consult.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving ID consultation were increasingly complex and more likely to die soon after consultation. These results provide a framework for ID clinicians to consider their role in end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"864-870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra Serris, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Joana D Laranjinha, Anna Candoni, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Helena Hammarström, Danila Seidel, Jan Styczynski, Raquel Sabino, Frederic Lamoth, Juergen Prattes, Adilia Warris, Raphaël Porcher, Fanny Lanternier
Background: Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA.
Methods: We conducted a European multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes with those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study (CEREALS).
Results: Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid-organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) underwent neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first-line treatment.
Conclusions: Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole.
简介脑曲霉菌病(CA)死亡率很高。根据 ECIL-6 和 ESCMID 指南,所有曲霉菌病的一线治疗推荐使用伏立康唑或异武康唑。然而,人们对异唑康唑在 CA 中的疗效和安全性知之甚少:我们对 2014 年至 2022 年期间接受异武康唑治疗的已证实或可能患有 CA 的患者进行了一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究,并将其结果与之前发表的法国全国 CA 队列--脑曲霉菌病病变研究--中的加权对照组结果进行了比较:来自 10 个国家的 40 名患者被纳入研究。主要基础疾病为血液恶性肿瘤(53%)和实体器官移植(20%)。伊沙夫康唑作为一线治疗药物用于10例患者,主要是联合治疗,结果70%的患者CA得到控制。30名患者在接受另一种疗法治疗中位数65天后接受了伊沙夫康唑治疗,其中大部分是因为副作用(50%)或之前的治疗失败(23%)。该药主要作为单药治疗,73%的患者的CA得到了控制。17名患者(43%)接受了神经外科手术。经测定,脑脊液中的异武康唑含量较低,但血清和脑组织中的异武康唑含量充足。7.5%的患者因异武康唑毒性而中断治疗。12周的死亡率为18%。与CEREALS队列的比较显示,接受异武康唑或伏立康唑作为一线治疗的患者生存率相当:结论:异武康唑似乎是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法。结论:伊沙武康唑似乎是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法,接受伊沙武康唑治疗的CA患者的死亡率与接受伏立康唑治疗的患者的死亡率相似。
{"title":"European Study of Cerebral Aspergillosis treated with Isavuconazole (ESCAI): A study by the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group.","authors":"Alexandra Serris, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Joana D Laranjinha, Anna Candoni, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Helena Hammarström, Danila Seidel, Jan Styczynski, Raquel Sabino, Frederic Lamoth, Juergen Prattes, Adilia Warris, Raphaël Porcher, Fanny Lanternier","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae371","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a European multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes with those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study (CEREALS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid-organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) underwent neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"936-943"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Andre C Kalil, Heng Jiang, Thomas Oppelt, Mark Berry, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Alpesh N Amin
Background Reducing hospital readmission offer potential benefits for patients, providers, payers, and policymakers to improve quality of healthcare, reduce cost, and improve patient experience. We investigated effectiveness of remdesivir in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related readmission during the Omicron era, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions. Methods This retrospective study utilized the US PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adult patients discharged alive from an index COVID-19 hospitalization between December 01, 2021 and February 29, 2024. Odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission to the same hospital were compared between patients who received remdesivir vs those not, after balancing characteristics of two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement during index hospitalization. Results Of 326,033 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during study period, 210,586 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 109,551 (52%) patients were treated with remdesivir. After IPTW, lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission were observed in patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, in the overall population (3.3% vs 4.2%, respectively; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.75–0.80]), elderly population (3.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; 0.78 [0.75–0.81]), and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions (5.3% vs 6.2%, respectively; 0.86 [0.80–0.92]). These results were consistent irrespective of supplemental oxygen requirements. Conclusions Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission across all patients discharged alive from the initial COVID-19 hospitalization, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.
{"title":"Remdesivir Effectiveness in Reducing the Risk of 30-day Readmission in Vulnerable Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Retrospective US Cohort Study Using Propensity Scores","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Andre C Kalil, Heng Jiang, Thomas Oppelt, Mark Berry, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Alpesh N Amin","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae511","url":null,"abstract":"Background Reducing hospital readmission offer potential benefits for patients, providers, payers, and policymakers to improve quality of healthcare, reduce cost, and improve patient experience. We investigated effectiveness of remdesivir in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related readmission during the Omicron era, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions. Methods This retrospective study utilized the US PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adult patients discharged alive from an index COVID-19 hospitalization between December 01, 2021 and February 29, 2024. Odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission to the same hospital were compared between patients who received remdesivir vs those not, after balancing characteristics of two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement during index hospitalization. Results Of 326,033 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during study period, 210,586 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 109,551 (52%) patients were treated with remdesivir. After IPTW, lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission were observed in patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, in the overall population (3.3% vs 4.2%, respectively; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.75–0.80]), elderly population (3.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; 0.78 [0.75–0.81]), and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions (5.3% vs 6.2%, respectively; 0.86 [0.80–0.92]). These results were consistent irrespective of supplemental oxygen requirements. Conclusions Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission across all patients discharged alive from the initial COVID-19 hospitalization, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Michelle K Haas, Shannon H Kasperbauer, Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura, Jared J Eddy, John D Mitchell, Reeti Khare, David E Griffith, Edward D Chan, Charles L Daley
Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in incidence globally and challenging to manage. The 2020 multisociety treatment guideline and the 2022 consensus recommendations provide comprehensive evidence-based guides to manage pulmonary diseases caused by the most common NTM. However, with >190 different NTM species that may require different multidrug regimens for treatment, the breadth and complexity of NTM-PD remain daunting for both patients and clinicians. In this narrative review, we aim to distill this broad, complex field into principles applicable to most NTM species and highlight important nuances, specifically elaborating on the presentation, diagnosis, principles of patient-centered care, principles of pathogen-directed therapy, and prospects of NTM-PD.
{"title":"Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: Patients, Principles, and Prospects","authors":"Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Michelle K Haas, Shannon H Kasperbauer, Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura, Jared J Eddy, John D Mitchell, Reeti Khare, David E Griffith, Edward D Chan, Charles L Daley","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae421","url":null,"abstract":"Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in incidence globally and challenging to manage. The 2020 multisociety treatment guideline and the 2022 consensus recommendations provide comprehensive evidence-based guides to manage pulmonary diseases caused by the most common NTM. However, with &gt;190 different NTM species that may require different multidrug regimens for treatment, the breadth and complexity of NTM-PD remain daunting for both patients and clinicians. In this narrative review, we aim to distill this broad, complex field into principles applicable to most NTM species and highlight important nuances, specifically elaborating on the presentation, diagnosis, principles of patient-centered care, principles of pathogen-directed therapy, and prospects of NTM-PD.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Mark Berry, Alpesh N Amin, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil
Background Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at an increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and mortality. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to inform outcomes of such patients treated with remdesivir. Methods Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score (PS) matched patients in remdesivir versus non-remdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematologic malignancies, and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Results Of 28,966 patients included in the study, 16,730 (58%) received remdesivir during first two days of hospitalization. After PS matching, 8,822 patients in remdesivir and 8,822 patients in non-remdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality among patients with no supplemental oxygen (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.73 [0.62-0.86]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.68-0.91]) and among those with supplemental oxygen (14-day, 0.75 [0.67-0.85]; 28-day, 0.78 [0.70-0.86]). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma), and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.
{"title":"Remdesivir-associated survival outcomes among immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19: real-world evidence from the Omicron dominant era","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Mark Berry, Alpesh N Amin, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae510","url":null,"abstract":"Background Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at an increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and mortality. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to inform outcomes of such patients treated with remdesivir. Methods Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score (PS) matched patients in remdesivir versus non-remdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematologic malignancies, and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Results Of 28,966 patients included in the study, 16,730 (58%) received remdesivir during first two days of hospitalization. After PS matching, 8,822 patients in remdesivir and 8,822 patients in non-remdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality among patients with no supplemental oxygen (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.73 [0.62-0.86]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.68-0.91]) and among those with supplemental oxygen (14-day, 0.75 [0.67-0.85]; 28-day, 0.78 [0.70-0.86]). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma), and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebecca Clark, Sam Davies, Jorge Labrador, Paul Loubet, Silvina Natalini Martínez, Helena Moza Moríñigo, Jean-François Nicolas, Mercè Pérez Vera, Mika Rämet, Maria Henar Rebollo-Rodrigo, Iván Sanz-Muñoz, Nancy Dezutter, Sophie Germain, Marie-Pierre David, Amulya Jayadev, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Shady Kotb, Nadia Meyer
Background: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds.
Methods: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.
Results: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups.
Conclusions: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine.
Clinical trials registration: NCT05568797.
背景:我们评估了在≥65岁的老年人中同时接种佐剂季节性四价流感疫苗(FLU-aQIV)和基于F蛋白的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)预融合疫苗(RSVPreF3 OA)的情况:这项 3 期开放标签试验随机分配年龄≥65 岁的患者同时接种 FLU-aQIV 和 RSVPreF3 OA(联合接种),或相隔 1 个月依次接种(对照组)。主要目的是证明FLU-aQIV和RSVPreF3 OA同时接种与顺序接种相比,在疫苗接种后1个月,各株FLU-aQIV的血凝抑制(HI)滴度以及RSV-A和RSV-B的中和滴度方面无劣效。此外,还对反应原性和安全性进行了评估:共有 1045 人接种了疫苗(联合免疫:523 人;对照组:522 人)。在甲型/乙型/Victoria(H1N1)、乙型/Victoria和乙型/Yamagata流感菌株的HI滴度和RSV-A中和滴度方面,FLU-aQIV和RSVPreF3 OA联合给药与连续给药相比无劣效(调整后几何平均滴度[GMT]比[对照组/联合给药组]≤1.50的95%置信区间[CI]上限[UL]),但在甲型/乙型/Victoria(H1N1)、乙型/Victoria和乙型/Yamagata流感菌株的HI滴度和RSV-A中和滴度方面无劣效。50),但对 A/Darwin(H3N2) HI 滴度的影响不大(95% CI UL = 1.53)。接种后调整的 GMT 比值(对照组/联合用药组)为 1.23(95% CI:1.06-1.42,即 UL ≤1.50),表明联合用药后对 A/Darwin(H3N2)产生了充分的免疫反应。各组之间的RSV-B中和滴度相当(调整后GMT比值的95% CI UL≤1.50)。主动发生的不良反应大多为轻度或中度,且为一过性;主动发生的不良反应和严重不良反应的发生率在各组之间保持平衡:临床试验注册:临床试验注册:NCT05568797。
{"title":"Safety and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine when Co-administered with Adjuvanted Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial.","authors":"Rebecca Clark, Sam Davies, Jorge Labrador, Paul Loubet, Silvina Natalini Martínez, Helena Moza Moríñigo, Jean-François Nicolas, Mercè Pérez Vera, Mika Rämet, Maria Henar Rebollo-Rodrigo, Iván Sanz-Muñoz, Nancy Dezutter, Sophie Germain, Marie-Pierre David, Amulya Jayadev, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Shady Kotb, Nadia Meyer","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae365","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT05568797.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1088-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141888685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Makhmujan Rashitov, Molly F Franke, Letizia Trevisi, Gulzhanat Bekbolatova, Julia Shalimova, Gafurzhan Eshmetov, Sagit Bektasov, Allison LaHood, Nataliya Arlyapova, Elna Osso, Askar Yedilbayev, Oleksandr Korotych, Anisoara Ciobanu, Alena Skrahina, Carole D Mitnick, Kwonjune J Seung, Yerkebulan Algozhin, Michael L Rich
Background: In 2019, the World Health Organization called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three 9-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded.
Results: Of 510 participants, 41% were women, the median age was 37 years (25th-75th percentile: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. A total of 399 (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% CI: 89-95%), 89% (95% CI: 80-94%), and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz, respectively. Clinically relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon.
Conclusions: All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of 3 Novel All-Oral Shortened Regimens for Rifampicin- or Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Kazakhstan.","authors":"Makhmujan Rashitov, Molly F Franke, Letizia Trevisi, Gulzhanat Bekbolatova, Julia Shalimova, Gafurzhan Eshmetov, Sagit Bektasov, Allison LaHood, Nataliya Arlyapova, Elna Osso, Askar Yedilbayev, Oleksandr Korotych, Anisoara Ciobanu, Alena Skrahina, Carole D Mitnick, Kwonjune J Seung, Yerkebulan Algozhin, Michael L Rich","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae305","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, the World Health Organization called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three 9-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 510 participants, 41% were women, the median age was 37 years (25th-75th percentile: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. A total of 399 (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% CI: 89-95%), 89% (95% CI: 80-94%), and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz, respectively. Clinically relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1046-1053"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tong Wang, Bosung Park, Gavin Anderson, Brian Shaller, Indre Budvytiene, Niaz Banaei
Background: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear.
Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result.
Results: A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease.
Conclusions: Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.
{"title":"Application of Diagnostic Stewardship to Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction: Low Yield of Follow-up Testing on Plasma and Bronchoalveolar Lavage After a Negative Result.","authors":"Tong Wang, Bosung Park, Gavin Anderson, Brian Shaller, Indre Budvytiene, Niaz Banaei","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae382","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"944-952"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}