首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Infectious Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to: Incidence of Tetanus and Diphtheria in Relation to Adult Vaccination Schedules. 更正:与成人疫苗接种时间表有关的破伤风和白喉发病率。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf014
{"title":"Correction to: Incidence of Tetanus and Diphtheria in Relation to Adult Vaccination Schedules.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142982831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting the risk of intensive care unit admission in patients with COVID-19 presenting in the emergency room: Development and evaluation of the CROSS score 预测在急诊室就诊的COVID-19患者进入重症监护病房的风险:CROSS评分的制定和评估
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf006
Weiwei Xiang, Fridolin Steinbeis, Kiret Dhindsa, Florian Kurth, Tilman Lingscheid, Charlotte Thibeault, Hans-Jakob Meyer, Norbert Suttorp, Mirja Mittermaier, Melanie Stecher, Margarete Scherer, Marina Hagen, Lazar Mitrov, Ramsia Geisler, Katharina S Appel, Sina M Hopff, Carolin Koll, Susana M Nunes de Miranda, Christina Weismantel, Jens-Peter Reese, Peter Heuschmann, Olga Miljukov, Carolin Nürnberger, Leif-Erik Sander, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Martin Witzenrath, Maarten van Smeden, Thomas Zoller
Background Existing risk evaluation tools underperform in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop and evaluate an accurate and calculator-free clinical tool for predicting ICU admission at emergency room (ER) presentation. Methods Data from patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide German cohort (March 2020-January 2023) were analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected based on literature and clinical expertise. A risk score, predicting ICU admission within seven days of ER presentation, was developed using elastic net logistic regression on a northern German cohort (derivation cohort), evaluated on a southern German cohort (evaluation cohort) and externally validated on a Colombian cohort. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility against existing tools. Results ICU admission rates within seven days were 30.8% (derivation cohort, n=1295, median age 60, 38.1% female), 28.1% (evaluation cohort, n=1123, median age 58, 36.9% female), and 30.3% (Colombian cohort, n=780, median age 57, 38.8% female). The 11-point CROSS score, based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation (with or without concurrent supplemental oxygen), and oxygen Supplementation, demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC): 0.77 in the evaluation cohort; 0.69 in the Colombian cohort), good calibration, and superior clinical utility compared to existing tools. Mortality-predicting tools performed poorly in predicting ICU admission risk for patients with COVID-19. Conclusions The calculator-free CROSS score effectively predicts ICU admission for patients with COVID-19 in the ER. Further studies are needed to assess its generalizability in other settings. Mortality-predicting tools are not recommended for ICU admission prediction.
背景现有风险评估工具在预测2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)方面表现不佳。本研究旨在开发和评估一种准确且无计算器的临床工具,用于预测急诊室(ER)的入住情况。方法分析2020年3月至2023年1月德国全国性队列中COVID-19患者的数据。候选预测因子是根据文献和临床专业知识选择的。在德国北部队列(衍生队列)中使用弹性网络逻辑回归,在德国南部队列(评估队列)中进行评估,并在哥伦比亚队列中进行外部验证,建立了预测急诊7天内入住ICU的风险评分。通过区分、校准和对现有工具的临床效用来评估性能。结果7天内ICU住院率分别为30.8%(衍生队列,n=1295,中位年龄60,女性38.1%)、28.1%(评估队列,n=1123,中位年龄58,女性36.9%)和30.3%(哥伦比亚队列,n=780,中位年龄57,女性38.8%)。基于混淆、呼吸率、血氧饱和度(是否同时补充氧气)和氧气补充的11分CROSS评分显示出良好的辨别能力(在评估队列中,曲线下面积(AUC): 0.77;0.69(哥伦比亚队列),良好的校准,与现有工具相比具有优越的临床实用性。死亡率预测工具在预测COVID-19患者ICU入院风险方面表现不佳。结论无计算器CROSS评分可有效预测急诊COVID-19患者的ICU入院情况。需要进一步的研究来评估其在其他情况下的普遍性。不建议使用死亡率预测工具来预测ICU的入院情况。
{"title":"Predicting the risk of intensive care unit admission in patients with COVID-19 presenting in the emergency room: Development and evaluation of the CROSS score","authors":"Weiwei Xiang, Fridolin Steinbeis, Kiret Dhindsa, Florian Kurth, Tilman Lingscheid, Charlotte Thibeault, Hans-Jakob Meyer, Norbert Suttorp, Mirja Mittermaier, Melanie Stecher, Margarete Scherer, Marina Hagen, Lazar Mitrov, Ramsia Geisler, Katharina S Appel, Sina M Hopff, Carolin Koll, Susana M Nunes de Miranda, Christina Weismantel, Jens-Peter Reese, Peter Heuschmann, Olga Miljukov, Carolin Nürnberger, Leif-Erik Sander, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Martin Witzenrath, Maarten van Smeden, Thomas Zoller","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf006","url":null,"abstract":"Background Existing risk evaluation tools underperform in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop and evaluate an accurate and calculator-free clinical tool for predicting ICU admission at emergency room (ER) presentation. Methods Data from patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide German cohort (March 2020-January 2023) were analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected based on literature and clinical expertise. A risk score, predicting ICU admission within seven days of ER presentation, was developed using elastic net logistic regression on a northern German cohort (derivation cohort), evaluated on a southern German cohort (evaluation cohort) and externally validated on a Colombian cohort. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility against existing tools. Results ICU admission rates within seven days were 30.8% (derivation cohort, n=1295, median age 60, 38.1% female), 28.1% (evaluation cohort, n=1123, median age 58, 36.9% female), and 30.3% (Colombian cohort, n=780, median age 57, 38.8% female). The 11-point CROSS score, based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation (with or without concurrent supplemental oxygen), and oxygen Supplementation, demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC): 0.77 in the evaluation cohort; 0.69 in the Colombian cohort), good calibration, and superior clinical utility compared to existing tools. Mortality-predicting tools performed poorly in predicting ICU admission risk for patients with COVID-19. Conclusions The calculator-free CROSS score effectively predicts ICU admission for patients with COVID-19 in the ER. Further studies are needed to assess its generalizability in other settings. Mortality-predicting tools are not recommended for ICU admission prediction.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142961615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of daily optimised doses of Rifampicin for the Treatment of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. 每日最佳剂量利福平治疗结核病的安全性、有效性和药代动力学:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf003
Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Ana Aguiar, Eva Nara, Angelica Medina, Gladys Molinas, Margarida Tavares, Teresa Tortola, Samiksha Ghimire, Jan-Willem C Alfenaar, Marieke G G Sturkenboom, Cecile Magis-Escurra, Adrián Sánchez-Montalva, Henrique Barros, Raquel Duarte

Background: Higher than standard doses of rifampicin could improve the treatment outcome of drug-susceptible tuberculosis without compromising the safety of patients.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of prospective clinical studies including adults with pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB receiving rifampicin doses above 10mg/kg/day. We extracted the data on overall adverse events (AE), hepatic AE, sputum culture conversion (SCC) at week 8, recurrence, mortality, and pharmacokinetics. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using a random-effects model.

Results: In 19 studies, 2033 out of 3654 participants received rifampicin doses higher than 10mg/kg/day. The NMA showed an increased risk of overall and hepatic AE for the 40mg/kg/day dose (RR 4.8, 95% CrI 1.1; 25, and 15.00, 95% CrI 1.1; 58.0, respectively), but no other doses, including 50mg/kg/day showed such an increase. Increasing doses improved sputum culture conversion at week 8 (RR 1.3, 95% CrI 1.1; 1.7 for SCC with 35mg/kg/day).

Conclusion: Optimal doses of rifampicin may be between 25 and 35mg/kg/day, but should be tailored at the individual or, at least, at the population level.

背景:高于标准剂量的利福平可以改善药敏结核的治疗效果,而不影响患者的安全性。方法:我们对前瞻性临床研究进行了系统回顾,包括接受利福平剂量大于10mg/kg/天的成人肺和肺外结核患者。我们提取了总体不良事件(AE)、肝脏AE、第8周痰培养转化(SCC)、复发、死亡率和药代动力学的数据。我们使用随机效应模型进行了贝叶斯网络元分析(NMA)。结果:在19项研究中,3654名参与者中有2033人接受的利福平剂量高于10mg/kg/天。NMA显示40mg/kg/天的剂量增加了整体和肝脏AE的风险(RR为4.8,95% CrI为1.1;25和15.00,95% CrI 1.1;(分别为58.0),但其他剂量,包括50mg/kg/天,没有出现这种增加。增加剂量可改善第8周的痰培养转化率(RR 1.3, 95% CrI 1.1;SCC (35mg/kg/天)为1.7。结论:利福平的最佳剂量可能在25 - 35mg/kg/天之间,但应根据个人或至少在人群水平进行调整。
{"title":"Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of daily optimised doses of Rifampicin for the Treatment of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Ana Aguiar, Eva Nara, Angelica Medina, Gladys Molinas, Margarida Tavares, Teresa Tortola, Samiksha Ghimire, Jan-Willem C Alfenaar, Marieke G G Sturkenboom, Cecile Magis-Escurra, Adrián Sánchez-Montalva, Henrique Barros, Raquel Duarte","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher than standard doses of rifampicin could improve the treatment outcome of drug-susceptible tuberculosis without compromising the safety of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of prospective clinical studies including adults with pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB receiving rifampicin doses above 10mg/kg/day. We extracted the data on overall adverse events (AE), hepatic AE, sputum culture conversion (SCC) at week 8, recurrence, mortality, and pharmacokinetics. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 19 studies, 2033 out of 3654 participants received rifampicin doses higher than 10mg/kg/day. The NMA showed an increased risk of overall and hepatic AE for the 40mg/kg/day dose (RR 4.8, 95% CrI 1.1; 25, and 15.00, 95% CrI 1.1; 58.0, respectively), but no other doses, including 50mg/kg/day showed such an increase. Increasing doses improved sputum culture conversion at week 8 (RR 1.3, 95% CrI 1.1; 1.7 for SCC with 35mg/kg/day).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimal doses of rifampicin may be between 25 and 35mg/kg/day, but should be tailored at the individual or, at least, at the population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142962063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Time for Higher Dose Rifampin. 高剂量利福平是时候了。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf005
Nicole F Maranchick, Charles Peloquin
{"title":"High Time for Higher Dose Rifampin.","authors":"Nicole F Maranchick, Charles Peloquin","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consistently higher seroresponse to benzathine penicillin G (BPG) combined with doxycycline versus BPG alone for early syphilis. 对于早期梅毒,联用苄星青霉素G (BPG)与强力霉素比单独使用BPG持续更高的血清反应。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae660
Kai-Hsiang Chen, Kuan-Yin Lin, Chien-Ching Hung
{"title":"Consistently higher seroresponse to benzathine penicillin G (BPG) combined with doxycycline versus BPG alone for early syphilis.","authors":"Kai-Hsiang Chen, Kuan-Yin Lin, Chien-Ching Hung","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae660","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors Associated With Mold-Positive Blood Cultures: 10-Year Data From a French Prospective Surveillance Program (2012-2022). 流行病学和与霉菌阳性血培养相关的预后因素:来自法国前瞻性监测项目(2012-2022)的10年数据。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae594
Thiziri Tala-Ighil, Dea Garcia-Hermoso, Frédéric Dalle, Sophie Cassaing, Juliette Guitard, Karine Boukris-Sitbon, Thomas Obadia, Olivier Lortholary, Valérie Letscher-Bru, Marie-Pierre Ledoux, Taïeb Chouaki, Anne Pauline Bellanger, Célia Rouges, Marie Elisabeth Bougnoux, Maxime Moniot, Marc Pihet, Vincent Dubée, Frédéric Gabriel, Florent Morio, Lilia Hasseine, Christine Bonnal, Maud Gits-Muselli, Estelle Perraud-Cateau, Caroline Mahinc, Muriel Nicolas, Elisabeth Chachaty, Camille Cordier, Laurence Lachaud, Laura Courtellemont, Benoït Henry, Cécile Angebault, Gilles Gargala, Adélaïde Chesnay, Marie Liesse Pacreau, Laure Kamus, Nicole Desbois-Nogard, Magalie Demar, Loïc Epelboin, Alexandre Alanio, Eric Dannaoui, Fanny Lanternier

Background: While invasive fusariosis and lomentosporiosis are known to be associated with fungemia, overall data on mold-related fungemia are limited, hampering early management. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of mold-positive blood cultures.

Methods: Epidemiological and clinical data on mold-positive blood cultures from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from the RESSIF database. Pseudofungemia was excluded using modified Duthie and Denning criteria. Univariable and multivariable Firth logistical regression was used to study factors associated with 90-day mortality.

Results: Fusarium spp accounted for 67.5% of the 80 events, involving predominantly Fusarium fujikuroi spp complex (FFSC), Neocosmospora spp, and Fusarium oxysporum spp complex (FOSC). Lomentospora prolificans was the second most frequent (10%), followed by Trichoderma spp, Aspergillus spp, and Mucorales (5% each).Most patients had a history of hematological malignancy (HM) (70%). Forty-three percent had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cutaneous and pulmonary lesions were common (43% each). Median time to blood culture positivity was 72 hours.HM and neutropenia were commonly reported in patients with FFSC, Neocosmospora spp, and L. prolificans fungemia. Pulmonary lesions were frequent in cases of L. prolificans fungemia. Patients with gastrointestinal conditions were frequently diagnosed with FOSC molds. HM (75%), particularly acute myeloblastic leukemia, was frequent in patients with Aspergillus spp fungemia. All patients with Trichoderma spp fungemia were exposed to corticosteroids.Day 90 mortality was 53%. Independent predictive factors of day 90 mortality included L. prolificans (odds ratio [OR], 33.3), Aspergillus spp fungemia (OR, 14.2), and corticosteroid exposure (OR, 7.85).

Conclusions: Underlying conditions and clinical presentation vary between genera and could be considered to guide early management.

背景:虽然已知侵袭性镰孢菌病和结节孢子病与真菌血症有关,但霉菌相关真菌血症的总体数据有限,妨碍了早期管理。本研究旨在描述霉菌阳性血培养的流行病学。方法:从RESSIF数据库中获取2012 - 2022年霉菌阳性血培养的流行病学和临床资料。采用改进的Duthie和Denning标准排除假真菌病。采用单变量和多变量Firth逻辑回归研究与90天死亡率相关的因素。结果:80例病原菌中镰刀菌占67.5%,主要包括藤黑镰刀菌复合体(Fusarium fujikuroi spp complex, FFSC)、新宇宙孢菌复合体(Neocosmospora spp)和尖孢镰刀菌复合体(Fusarium oxysporum spp complex, FOSC)。第二常见的是增生性Lomentospora prolificans(10%),其次是木霉、曲霉和毛霉菌(各占5%)。大多数患者有血液系统恶性肿瘤史(HM)(70%)。43%的患者接受了异基因造血干细胞移植。皮肤和肺部病变常见(各占43%)。血培养阳性的中位时间为72小时。HM和中性粒细胞减少症常见于FFSC、新宇宙孢子菌和增生性乳杆菌真菌血症患者。肺病变多见于增生性乳杆菌真菌血症。胃肠道疾病患者常被诊断为FOSC霉菌。HM(75%),特别是急性髓母细胞白血病,常见于曲霉属真菌血症患者。所有木霉菌血症患者均暴露于皮质类固醇。第90天死亡率为53%。第90天死亡率的独立预测因素包括增生性乳杆菌(比值比[OR], 33.3)、曲霉真菌血症(比值比,14.2)和皮质类固醇暴露(比值比,7.85)。结论:基础条件和临床表现因属而异,可以考虑指导早期治疗。
{"title":"Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors Associated With Mold-Positive Blood Cultures: 10-Year Data From a French Prospective Surveillance Program (2012-2022).","authors":"Thiziri Tala-Ighil, Dea Garcia-Hermoso, Frédéric Dalle, Sophie Cassaing, Juliette Guitard, Karine Boukris-Sitbon, Thomas Obadia, Olivier Lortholary, Valérie Letscher-Bru, Marie-Pierre Ledoux, Taïeb Chouaki, Anne Pauline Bellanger, Célia Rouges, Marie Elisabeth Bougnoux, Maxime Moniot, Marc Pihet, Vincent Dubée, Frédéric Gabriel, Florent Morio, Lilia Hasseine, Christine Bonnal, Maud Gits-Muselli, Estelle Perraud-Cateau, Caroline Mahinc, Muriel Nicolas, Elisabeth Chachaty, Camille Cordier, Laurence Lachaud, Laura Courtellemont, Benoït Henry, Cécile Angebault, Gilles Gargala, Adélaïde Chesnay, Marie Liesse Pacreau, Laure Kamus, Nicole Desbois-Nogard, Magalie Demar, Loïc Epelboin, Alexandre Alanio, Eric Dannaoui, Fanny Lanternier","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae594","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While invasive fusariosis and lomentosporiosis are known to be associated with fungemia, overall data on mold-related fungemia are limited, hampering early management. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of mold-positive blood cultures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Epidemiological and clinical data on mold-positive blood cultures from 2012 to 2022 were obtained from the RESSIF database. Pseudofungemia was excluded using modified Duthie and Denning criteria. Univariable and multivariable Firth logistical regression was used to study factors associated with 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fusarium spp accounted for 67.5% of the 80 events, involving predominantly Fusarium fujikuroi spp complex (FFSC), Neocosmospora spp, and Fusarium oxysporum spp complex (FOSC). Lomentospora prolificans was the second most frequent (10%), followed by Trichoderma spp, Aspergillus spp, and Mucorales (5% each).Most patients had a history of hematological malignancy (HM) (70%). Forty-three percent had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cutaneous and pulmonary lesions were common (43% each). Median time to blood culture positivity was 72 hours.HM and neutropenia were commonly reported in patients with FFSC, Neocosmospora spp, and L. prolificans fungemia. Pulmonary lesions were frequent in cases of L. prolificans fungemia. Patients with gastrointestinal conditions were frequently diagnosed with FOSC molds. HM (75%), particularly acute myeloblastic leukemia, was frequent in patients with Aspergillus spp fungemia. All patients with Trichoderma spp fungemia were exposed to corticosteroids.Day 90 mortality was 53%. Independent predictive factors of day 90 mortality included L. prolificans (odds ratio [OR], 33.3), Aspergillus spp fungemia (OR, 14.2), and corticosteroid exposure (OR, 7.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Underlying conditions and clinical presentation vary between genera and could be considered to guide early management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of Repeat Hepatitis C Viremia After Sustained Virologic Response in a Large Cohort of U.S. Veterans. 大量美国退伍军人持续病毒学应答后的重复丙型肝炎病毒血症分析
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf008
Alexander Matelski, Bruce Gregoire, Lauren A Beste, Cara D Varley, Elliott Lowy, Emily J Cartwright, Timothy R Morgan, David B Ross, Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror, Marissa M Maier

Background: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects >1% of the U.S. population, higher among U.S. Veterans. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications are effective for viral cure, termed sustained virologic response (SVR), but repeat viremia after SVR is recognized. Prior work has been limited by use of electronic medical record data. We aim to better understand repeat viremia in the DAA era through detailed chart review.

Methods: We identified 1,129 individuals from Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) who achieved SVR using DAA therapy but subsequently had detectable serum HCV nucleic acid. A random subset of 110 were chart reviewed and assigned one of four categories using laboratory, diagnosis, and chart review data: definite reinfection (25.5%), probable reinfection (25.5%), false positive (11.8%), and presumed late relapse (37.3%). We conducted between-group analysis of variance to identify demographic, behavioral, and laboratory features specific to each.

Results: In our medical record cohort (n=1,129), substance use and unstable housing were common and median time to repeat viremia was 1.9 years. In our chart review cohort (n=110), younger age (18-34) and substance use were more frequent in definite or probable reinfection. Presumed relapse had comparatively more comorbid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (20%, p<0.05) and more than half occurred prior to 1 year. The unique category of false positive has not previously been reported.

Conclusions: This study deepens understanding of HCV reinfection and relapse and highlights important features including the HCV and opioid syndemic, contribution of laboratory error, possibility of a viral reservoir in HCC, and clinical engagement implications for those with ongoing risk.

背景:慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染影响了1%的美国人口,在美国退伍军人中更高。直接抗病毒(DAA)药物对病毒治愈是有效的,称为持续病毒学反应(SVR),但SVR后的重复病毒血症是公认的。以前的工作受到电子病历数据使用的限制。我们的目标是通过详细的图表回顾,更好地了解DAA时代的重复病毒血症。方法:我们从退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中挑选了1129名使用DAA治疗达到SVR但随后检测到血清HCV核酸的个体。随机选取110人进行图表回顾,并根据实验室、诊断和图表回顾数据将其分为四类:明确再感染(25.5%)、可能再感染(25.5%)、假阳性(11.8%)和推测晚期复发(37.3%)。我们进行了组间方差分析,以确定每个组的人口统计学、行为学和实验室特征。结果:在我们的医疗记录队列中(n= 1129),药物使用和不稳定的住房是常见的,重复病毒血症的中位时间为1.9年。在我们的图表回顾队列(n=110)中,年龄较小(18-34岁)和药物使用在确定或可能的再感染中更常见。结论:本研究加深了对HCV再感染和复发的理解,并强调了HCV和阿片类药物综合征、实验室错误的贡献、HCC病毒库的可能性以及对持续风险患者的临床参与意义等重要特征。
{"title":"Analysis of Repeat Hepatitis C Viremia After Sustained Virologic Response in a Large Cohort of U.S. Veterans.","authors":"Alexander Matelski, Bruce Gregoire, Lauren A Beste, Cara D Varley, Elliott Lowy, Emily J Cartwright, Timothy R Morgan, David B Ross, Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror, Marissa M Maier","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects >1% of the U.S. population, higher among U.S. Veterans. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications are effective for viral cure, termed sustained virologic response (SVR), but repeat viremia after SVR is recognized. Prior work has been limited by use of electronic medical record data. We aim to better understand repeat viremia in the DAA era through detailed chart review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 1,129 individuals from Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) who achieved SVR using DAA therapy but subsequently had detectable serum HCV nucleic acid. A random subset of 110 were chart reviewed and assigned one of four categories using laboratory, diagnosis, and chart review data: definite reinfection (25.5%), probable reinfection (25.5%), false positive (11.8%), and presumed late relapse (37.3%). We conducted between-group analysis of variance to identify demographic, behavioral, and laboratory features specific to each.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our medical record cohort (n=1,129), substance use and unstable housing were common and median time to repeat viremia was 1.9 years. In our chart review cohort (n=110), younger age (18-34) and substance use were more frequent in definite or probable reinfection. Presumed relapse had comparatively more comorbid hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (20%, p<0.05) and more than half occurred prior to 1 year. The unique category of false positive has not previously been reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study deepens understanding of HCV reinfection and relapse and highlights important features including the HCV and opioid syndemic, contribution of laboratory error, possibility of a viral reservoir in HCC, and clinical engagement implications for those with ongoing risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Confounding could explain better sero-response of doxycycline/benzathine versus benzathine penicillin for syphilis. 混淆可以解释多西环素/苄星与苄星青霉素治疗梅毒的血清反应更好。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae659
Chris Kenyon
{"title":"Confounding could explain better sero-response of doxycycline/benzathine versus benzathine penicillin for syphilis.","authors":"Chris Kenyon","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae659","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety of Triple-Dose Rifampin in Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 三剂量利福平治疗结核病的安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf004
Omri A Arbiv, Thomas Holmes, Marie JeongMin Kim, Marie Yan, Kamila Romanowski, Sarah K Brode, William J Burman, Dick Menzies, James C Johnston

Background: There is growing interest in using high-dose rifampin for tuberculosis treatment. Recent studies suggest that triple-dose rifampin (TDR; ≥30 mg/kg/day) may be unsafe. We updated a systematic review to investigate the safety and efficacy of TDR.

Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized-controlled trials from January 1, 1965 to February 10, 2024 comparing standard-dose rifampin (SDR) to TDR and/or double-dose rifampin (DDR) in human tuberculosis treatment. The primary outcome was pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of severe adverse events (SevAE) between participants receiving TDR and SDR. Pooled relative risk (RR) of death was a key secondary outcome. Meta-analysis was performed by the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and bias assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. The protocol was prospectively registered (osf.io/kfn5a).

Results: Of the 11315 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria, enrolling 2313 SDR participants (17 studies), 2238 receiving DDR (12 studies), and 1199 receiving TDR (11 studies). Six studies had a high risk of bias. There was an increase in pooled SevAE among participants receiving TDR compared to SDR (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.96, I2 23%), driven by an increase in hepatic events (IRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.21-3.18). Death did not differ between participants receiving TDR and SDR (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-1.99). One limitation is that only two included studies were blinded.

Conclusions: Regimens using TDR were associated with an increase in SevAE, raising concerns regarding safety of TDR in humans.

背景:人们对使用大剂量利福平治疗结核病越来越感兴趣。最近的研究表明,三剂量利福平(TDR;≥30mg /kg/天)可能不安全。我们更新了一项系统综述,以调查TDR的安全性和有效性。方法:检索Embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库和clinicaltrials.gov,检索1965年1月1日至2024年2月10日期间比较标准剂量利福平(SDR)与TDR和/或双剂量利福平(DDR)治疗人类结核病的随机对照试验。主要终点是接受TDR和SDR的参与者之间严重不良事件(SevAE)的合并发生率比(IRR)。死亡的综合相对危险度(RR)是一个关键的次要结局。采用反方差法进行meta分析。异质性采用I2评估,偏倚采用Cochrane Risk of bias 2评估。该协议被前瞻性注册(osf.io/kfn5a)。结果:在纳入的11315篇文章中,17篇符合纳入标准,纳入了2313名SDR参与者(17项研究),2238名接受DDR(12项研究),1199名接受TDR(11项研究)。6项研究存在高偏倚风险。与SDR相比,接受TDR的参与者的总SevAE增加(IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.96, I2 23%),原因是肝脏事件增加(IRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.21-3.18)。接受TDR和SDR的参与者的死亡率没有差异(RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-1.99)。一个限制是只有两个纳入的研究是盲法的。结论:使用TDR的方案与SevAE的增加有关,这引起了人们对TDR在人类中的安全性的关注。
{"title":"Safety of Triple-Dose Rifampin in Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Omri A Arbiv, Thomas Holmes, Marie JeongMin Kim, Marie Yan, Kamila Romanowski, Sarah K Brode, William J Burman, Dick Menzies, James C Johnston","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing interest in using high-dose rifampin for tuberculosis treatment. Recent studies suggest that triple-dose rifampin (TDR; ≥30 mg/kg/day) may be unsafe. We updated a systematic review to investigate the safety and efficacy of TDR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized-controlled trials from January 1, 1965 to February 10, 2024 comparing standard-dose rifampin (SDR) to TDR and/or double-dose rifampin (DDR) in human tuberculosis treatment. The primary outcome was pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of severe adverse events (SevAE) between participants receiving TDR and SDR. Pooled relative risk (RR) of death was a key secondary outcome. Meta-analysis was performed by the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and bias assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. The protocol was prospectively registered (osf.io/kfn5a).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11315 articles identified, 17 met inclusion criteria, enrolling 2313 SDR participants (17 studies), 2238 receiving DDR (12 studies), and 1199 receiving TDR (11 studies). Six studies had a high risk of bias. There was an increase in pooled SevAE among participants receiving TDR compared to SDR (IRR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.96, I2 23%), driven by an increase in hepatic events (IRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.21-3.18). Death did not differ between participants receiving TDR and SDR (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.71-1.99). One limitation is that only two included studies were blinded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regimens using TDR were associated with an increase in SevAE, raising concerns regarding safety of TDR in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Application of Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy for Implant-Related Infection. 抑制性抗生素治疗在种植体相关感染中的应用。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaf002
Xiang-Dong Wu, Yuhao Liu, Xing Wang
{"title":"The Application of Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy for Implant-Related Infection.","authors":"Xiang-Dong Wu, Yuhao Liu, Xing Wang","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142945816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1