首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Infectious Diseases最新文献

英文 中文
Preventing New Gram-negative Resistance Through Beta-lactam De-escalation in Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 通过对住院败血症患者降级β-内酰胺来预防新的革兰氏阴性菌耐药性:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae253
Besu F Teshome, Taehwan Park, Joel Arackal, Nicholas Hampton, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek

Background: Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed.

Findings: Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]).

Conclusions: De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.

背景:抗生素降级是否会降低后续抗生素耐药性的风险尚不确定。我们试图确定β-内酰胺类(BL)抗生素降级是否与脓毒症住院患者革兰氏阴性菌新耐药性发生率降低有关:在一项回顾性队列研究中,研究人员招募了至少连续 3 天使用β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗的脓毒症患者,其中前 2 天使用的是广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素,广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素的定义是谱系评分(SS)≥7。患者分为三类:(1) β-内酰胺类药物频谱评分(BLSS)降级;(2) BLSS 无变化;或 (3) BLSS 升级。主要结果是在进入组群后 60 天内从临床培养中分离出新的耐药革兰氏阴性菌。在考虑院内死亡这一竞争风险的同时,还进行了细格雷比例危险回归建模:在 7742 名患者中,有 644 名患者(8.3%)产生了新的革兰氏阴性菌耐药性。产生耐药性的平均时间为 23.7 天,发病率为每 1000 个患者日 1.85 例(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.71-2.00)。降级组的发生率最低,每 1000 个患者日为 1.42(95% 置信区间:1.16-1.68)。与无变化相比,BL降级与新革兰阴性耐药性的发生率明显降低(危险比(HR)0.59 [95% CI:.48-.73]):结论:与不变式相比,降级与新耐药性产生的风险降低有关。这是迄今为止规模最大的一项研究,显示了降级在预防抗菌药耐药性方面的作用。
{"title":"Preventing New Gram-negative Resistance Through Beta-lactam De-escalation in Hospitalized Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Besu F Teshome, Taehwan Park, Joel Arackal, Nicholas Hampton, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae253","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether antibiotic de-escalation reduces the risk of subsequent antibiotic resistance is uncertain. We sought to determine if beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic de-escalation is associated with decreased incidence of new Gram-negative resistance in hospitalized patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who were treated with at least 3 consecutive days of BL antibiotics, the first 2 days of which were with a broad-spectrum BL agent defined as a spectrum score (SS) of ≥7 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into three categories: (1) de-escalation of beta-lactam spectrum score (BLSS), (2) no change in BLSS, or (3) escalation of BLSS. The primary outcome was the isolation of a new drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a clinical culture within 60 days of cohort entry. Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for in-hospital death as a competing risk was performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Six hundred forty-four patients of 7742 (8.3%) patients developed new gram-negative resistance. The mean time to resistance was 23.7 days yielding an incidence rate of 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71-2.00) per 1000 patient-days. The lowest incidence rate was observed in the de-escalated group 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16-1.68) per 1000 patient-days. Statistically significant reductions in the development of new gram-negative resistance were associated with BL de-escalation compared to no-change (hazards ratio (HR) 0.59 [95% CI: .48-.73]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>De-escalation was associated with a decreased risk of new resistance development compared to no change. This represents the largest study to date showing the utility of de-escalation in the prevention of antimicrobial resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"826-833"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Infection: Mortality and End-of-Life Care Associated With Infectious Disease Consultation in an Academic Health System. 超越感染:一个学术医疗系统中与传染病咨询相关的死亡率和临终关怀。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae325
Alison G C Smith, Michael E Yarrington, Arthur W Baker, Gary M Cox, Kristen V Dicks, John J Engemann, Patricia Kohler, Ahmad Mourad, Rasha Raslan, Wil L Santivasi, Nicholas A Turner, Rebekah H Wrenn, Sofia Zavala, Jason E Stout

Background: Infectious diseases (ID) physicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of caring for patients with terminal illnesses or incurable infections.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an ID consult within an academic health system from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2023, including community, general, and transplant ID consult services.

Results: There were 60 820 inpatient ID consults (17 235 community, 29 999 general, and 13 586 transplant) involving 37 848 unique patients. The number of consults increased by 94% and the rate rose from 5.0 to 9.9 consults per 100 inpatients (P < .001). In total, 7.5% of patients receiving an ID consult died during admission and 1006 (2.6%) of patients were discharged to hospice. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for community ID, 7.8% for general ID, and 10.7% for transplant ID patients (P < .001). Six-month mortality was 9% for all nonobstetric admissions versus 19% for community ID, 20.9% for general ID, and 22.3% for transplant ID. In total 2866 (7.6%) of all patients receiving ID consultation also received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization. The index ID consult preceded any palliative consult in the majority (69.5%) of cases. A total of 16.3% of patients had a do-not-resuscitate order during the index hospitalization; 12.2% of all patients with a do-not-resuscitate order had this placed on the same day as the ID consult.

Conclusions: Patients receiving ID consultation were increasingly complex and more likely to die soon after consultation. These results provide a framework for ID clinicians to consider their role in end-of-life care.

背景:传染病(ID)医生越来越多地面临着照顾身患绝症或无法治愈的感染患者的挑战:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2014年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间在学术医疗系统内接受过ID会诊的所有患者,包括社区、普通和移植ID会诊服务:共有 60,820 例住院 ID 咨询(17,235 例社区咨询、29,999 例普通咨询和 13,586 例移植咨询),涉及 37,848 名患者。会诊次数增加了 94%,会诊率从每 100 名住院病人 5.0 次上升到 9.9 次(p 结论:接受内科会诊的病人越来越复杂:接受内科会诊的患者病情越来越复杂,更有可能在会诊后不久死亡。这些结果为内科临床医生考虑其在临终关怀中的作用提供了一个框架。
{"title":"Beyond Infection: Mortality and End-of-Life Care Associated With Infectious Disease Consultation in an Academic Health System.","authors":"Alison G C Smith, Michael E Yarrington, Arthur W Baker, Gary M Cox, Kristen V Dicks, John J Engemann, Patricia Kohler, Ahmad Mourad, Rasha Raslan, Wil L Santivasi, Nicholas A Turner, Rebekah H Wrenn, Sofia Zavala, Jason E Stout","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae325","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae325","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases (ID) physicians are increasingly faced with the challenge of caring for patients with terminal illnesses or incurable infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort of all patients with an ID consult within an academic health system from 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2023, including community, general, and transplant ID consult services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 60 820 inpatient ID consults (17 235 community, 29 999 general, and 13 586 transplant) involving 37 848 unique patients. The number of consults increased by 94% and the rate rose from 5.0 to 9.9 consults per 100 inpatients (P < .001). In total, 7.5% of patients receiving an ID consult died during admission and 1006 (2.6%) of patients were discharged to hospice. In-hospital mortality was 5.2% for community ID, 7.8% for general ID, and 10.7% for transplant ID patients (P < .001). Six-month mortality was 9% for all nonobstetric admissions versus 19% for community ID, 20.9% for general ID, and 22.3% for transplant ID. In total 2866 (7.6%) of all patients receiving ID consultation also received palliative care consultation during the same hospitalization. The index ID consult preceded any palliative consult in the majority (69.5%) of cases. A total of 16.3% of patients had a do-not-resuscitate order during the index hospitalization; 12.2% of all patients with a do-not-resuscitate order had this placed on the same day as the ID consult.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients receiving ID consultation were increasingly complex and more likely to die soon after consultation. These results provide a framework for ID clinicians to consider their role in end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"864-870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141310227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
European Study of Cerebral Aspergillosis treated with Isavuconazole (ESCAI): A study by the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group. 伊沙窝康唑治疗脑曲霉菌病的欧洲研究:EFISG 研究。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae371
Alexandra Serris, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Joana D Laranjinha, Anna Candoni, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Helena Hammarström, Danila Seidel, Jan Styczynski, Raquel Sabino, Frederic Lamoth, Juergen Prattes, Adilia Warris, Raphaël Porcher, Fanny Lanternier

Background: Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA.

Methods: We conducted a European multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes with those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study (CEREALS).

Results: Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid-organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) underwent neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first-line treatment.

Conclusions: Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole.

简介脑曲霉菌病(CA)死亡率很高。根据 ECIL-6 和 ESCMID 指南,所有曲霉菌病的一线治疗推荐使用伏立康唑或异武康唑。然而,人们对异唑康唑在 CA 中的疗效和安全性知之甚少:我们对 2014 年至 2022 年期间接受异武康唑治疗的已证实或可能患有 CA 的患者进行了一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究,并将其结果与之前发表的法国全国 CA 队列--脑曲霉菌病病变研究--中的加权对照组结果进行了比较:来自 10 个国家的 40 名患者被纳入研究。主要基础疾病为血液恶性肿瘤(53%)和实体器官移植(20%)。伊沙夫康唑作为一线治疗药物用于10例患者,主要是联合治疗,结果70%的患者CA得到控制。30名患者在接受另一种疗法治疗中位数65天后接受了伊沙夫康唑治疗,其中大部分是因为副作用(50%)或之前的治疗失败(23%)。该药主要作为单药治疗,73%的患者的CA得到了控制。17名患者(43%)接受了神经外科手术。经测定,脑脊液中的异武康唑含量较低,但血清和脑组织中的异武康唑含量充足。7.5%的患者因异武康唑毒性而中断治疗。12周的死亡率为18%。与CEREALS队列的比较显示,接受异武康唑或伏立康唑作为一线治疗的患者生存率相当:结论:异武康唑似乎是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法。结论:伊沙武康唑似乎是一种耐受性良好的治疗方法,接受伊沙武康唑治疗的CA患者的死亡率与接受伏立康唑治疗的患者的死亡率相似。
{"title":"European Study of Cerebral Aspergillosis treated with Isavuconazole (ESCAI): A study by the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group.","authors":"Alexandra Serris, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Joana D Laranjinha, Anna Candoni, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Helena Hammarström, Danila Seidel, Jan Styczynski, Raquel Sabino, Frederic Lamoth, Juergen Prattes, Adilia Warris, Raphaël Porcher, Fanny Lanternier","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae371","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral aspergillosis (CA) is associated with high mortality. According to the European Conference on Infections in Leukemia and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines, the recommended first-line treatment for all forms of aspergillosis is voriconazole or isavuconazole. However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in CA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a European multicenter retrospective study of patients treated with isavuconazole for proven or probable CA between 2014 and 2022 and compared the outcomes with those of weighted control groups from the previously published French national cohort of CA, the Cerebral Aspergillosis Lesional Study (CEREALS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients from 10 countries were included. The main underlying conditions were hematological malignancies (53%) and solid-organ transplantation (20%). Isavuconazole was administered as a first-line treatment to 10 patients, primarily in combination therapy, resulting in control of CA in 70% of these cases. Thirty patients received isavuconazole after a median of 65 days on another therapy, mostly because of side effects (50%) or therapeutic failure (23%) of the previous treatment. Predominantly given as monotherapy, it achieved control of CA in 73% of the patients. Seventeen patients (43%) underwent neurosurgery. When measured, isavuconazole levels were low in cerebrospinal fluid but adequate in serum and brain tissue. Isavuconazole toxicity led to treatment interruption in 7.5% of the patients. Twelve-week mortality was 18%. Comparison with the CEREALS cohort showed comparable survival in patients receiving isavuconazole or voriconazole as a first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isavuconazole appears to be a well-tolerated treatment. Mortality of CA treated with isavuconazole is similar to that reported with voriconazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"936-943"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141792161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remdesivir Effectiveness in Reducing the Risk of 30-day Readmission in Vulnerable Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Retrospective US Cohort Study Using Propensity Scores 雷米地韦能有效降低因 COVID-19 而住院的高危患者 30 天内再次入院的风险:使用倾向评分的美国队列回顾性研究
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae511
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Andre C Kalil, Heng Jiang, Thomas Oppelt, Mark Berry, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Alpesh N Amin
Background Reducing hospital readmission offer potential benefits for patients, providers, payers, and policymakers to improve quality of healthcare, reduce cost, and improve patient experience. We investigated effectiveness of remdesivir in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related readmission during the Omicron era, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions. Methods This retrospective study utilized the US PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adult patients discharged alive from an index COVID-19 hospitalization between December 01, 2021 and February 29, 2024. Odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission to the same hospital were compared between patients who received remdesivir vs those not, after balancing characteristics of two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement during index hospitalization. Results Of 326,033 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during study period, 210,586 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 109,551 (52%) patients were treated with remdesivir. After IPTW, lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission were observed in patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, in the overall population (3.3% vs 4.2%, respectively; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.75–0.80]), elderly population (3.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; 0.78 [0.75–0.81]), and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions (5.3% vs 6.2%, respectively; 0.86 [0.80–0.92]). These results were consistent irrespective of supplemental oxygen requirements. Conclusions Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission across all patients discharged alive from the initial COVID-19 hospitalization, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.
背景 降低再入院率可为患者、医疗服务提供者、支付者和政策制定者带来潜在的益处,从而提高医疗质量、降低成本并改善患者体验。我们调查了在 Omicron 时代雷米替韦在减少 30 天 COVID-19 相关再入院方面的有效性,包括老年人和有潜在免疫力低下情况的患者。方法 这项回顾性研究利用美国 PINC AI 医疗保健数据库来识别 2021 年 12 月 1 日至 2024 年 2 月 29 日期间从 COVID-19 指征住院治疗中存活出院的成年患者。使用反向治疗概率加权法(IPTW)平衡两组患者的特征后,比较了接受雷米替韦治疗与未接受雷米替韦治疗的患者在 30 天内再次入院接受 COVID-19 相关治疗的几率。分析按住院期间最大补氧需求进行分层。结果 在研究期间因 COVID-19 住院的 326,033 名患者中,有 210,586 名患者符合资格标准。其中,109551 名患者(52%)接受了雷米替韦治疗。IPTW治疗后,在总体人群中,接受雷米替韦治疗的患者与未接受雷米替韦治疗的患者相比,30天内COVID-19相关再入院的几率更低(分别为3.3% vs 4.2%;几率比[95%置信区间]:0.78 [0.75-0.75] [0.78-0.75]):0.78[0.75-0.80])、老年人群(分别为 3.7% vs 4.7%;0.78[0.75-0.81])和有潜在免疫力低下症状的人群(分别为 5.3% vs 6.2%;0.86[0.80-0.92])。无论是否需要补充氧气,这些结果都是一致的。结论 对因COVID-19住院的患者使用雷米替韦治疗与COVID-19相关的30天再入院的可能性显著降低。
{"title":"Remdesivir Effectiveness in Reducing the Risk of 30-day Readmission in Vulnerable Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Retrospective US Cohort Study Using Propensity Scores","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Andre C Kalil, Heng Jiang, Thomas Oppelt, Mark Berry, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Alpesh N Amin","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae511","url":null,"abstract":"Background Reducing hospital readmission offer potential benefits for patients, providers, payers, and policymakers to improve quality of healthcare, reduce cost, and improve patient experience. We investigated effectiveness of remdesivir in reducing 30-day COVID-19-related readmission during the Omicron era, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions. Methods This retrospective study utilized the US PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adult patients discharged alive from an index COVID-19 hospitalization between December 01, 2021 and February 29, 2024. Odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission to the same hospital were compared between patients who received remdesivir vs those not, after balancing characteristics of two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement during index hospitalization. Results Of 326,033 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during study period, 210,586 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 109,551 (52%) patients were treated with remdesivir. After IPTW, lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission were observed in patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, in the overall population (3.3% vs 4.2%, respectively; odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.75–0.80]), elderly population (3.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; 0.78 [0.75–0.81]), and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions (5.3% vs 6.2%, respectively; 0.86 [0.80–0.92]). These results were consistent irrespective of supplemental oxygen requirements. Conclusions Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission across all patients discharged alive from the initial COVID-19 hospitalization, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"230 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: Patients, Principles, and Prospects 非结核分枝杆菌肺病:患者、原理与前景
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae421
Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Michelle K Haas, Shannon H Kasperbauer, Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura, Jared J Eddy, John D Mitchell, Reeti Khare, David E Griffith, Edward D Chan, Charles L Daley
Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in incidence globally and challenging to manage. The 2020 multisociety treatment guideline and the 2022 consensus recommendations provide comprehensive evidence-based guides to manage pulmonary diseases caused by the most common NTM. However, with &gt;190 different NTM species that may require different multidrug regimens for treatment, the breadth and complexity of NTM-PD remain daunting for both patients and clinicians. In this narrative review, we aim to distill this broad, complex field into principles applicable to most NTM species and highlight important nuances, specifically elaborating on the presentation, diagnosis, principles of patient-centered care, principles of pathogen-directed therapy, and prospects of NTM-PD.
非结核分枝杆菌肺病(NTM-PD)在全球的发病率越来越高,管理起来也越来越困难。2020 年多协会治疗指南和 2022 年共识建议为治疗最常见的 NTM 引起的肺部疾病提供了全面的循证指南。然而,190 种不同的 NTM 可能需要不同的多药治疗方案,NTM-PD 的广泛性和复杂性仍然令患者和临床医生望而生畏。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们旨在将这一广泛而复杂的领域提炼为适用于大多数 NTM 物种的原则,并强调重要的细微差别,特别是阐述 NTM-PD 的表现、诊断、以患者为中心的护理原则、病原体导向治疗原则和前景。
{"title":"Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: Patients, Principles, and Prospects","authors":"Minh-Vu H Nguyen, Michelle K Haas, Shannon H Kasperbauer, Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura, Jared J Eddy, John D Mitchell, Reeti Khare, David E Griffith, Edward D Chan, Charles L Daley","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae421","url":null,"abstract":"Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in incidence globally and challenging to manage. The 2020 multisociety treatment guideline and the 2022 consensus recommendations provide comprehensive evidence-based guides to manage pulmonary diseases caused by the most common NTM. However, with &amp;gt;190 different NTM species that may require different multidrug regimens for treatment, the breadth and complexity of NTM-PD remain daunting for both patients and clinicians. In this narrative review, we aim to distill this broad, complex field into principles applicable to most NTM species and highlight important nuances, specifically elaborating on the presentation, diagnosis, principles of patient-centered care, principles of pathogen-directed therapy, and prospects of NTM-PD.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remdesivir-associated survival outcomes among immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19: real-world evidence from the Omicron dominant era 因 COVID-19 而住院的免疫功能低下患者中雷米地韦相关的生存结果:来自 Omicron dominant 时代的真实证据
IF 11.8 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae510
Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Mark Berry, Alpesh N Amin, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil
Background Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at an increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and mortality. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to inform outcomes of such patients treated with remdesivir. Methods Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score (PS) matched patients in remdesivir versus non-remdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematologic malignancies, and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Results Of 28,966 patients included in the study, 16,730 (58%) received remdesivir during first two days of hospitalization. After PS matching, 8,822 patients in remdesivir and 8,822 patients in non-remdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality among patients with no supplemental oxygen (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.73 [0.62-0.86]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.68-0.91]) and among those with supplemental oxygen (14-day, 0.75 [0.67-0.85]; 28-day, 0.78 [0.70-0.86]). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma), and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.
背景 免疫功能低下的患者发生冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)相关住院和死亡的风险增加。随机临床试验提供的入组人数有限(如果有的话),无法为此类患者接受雷米替韦治疗的结果提供信息。方法 利用美国 PINC AI 医疗保健数据库,我们确定了 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 2 月期间因 COVID-19 而住院的免疫力低下成年患者。主要结果是倾向评分(PS)匹配的雷米地韦组与非雷米地韦组患者的全因住院死亡率。对癌症患者、血液系统恶性肿瘤患者和实体器官/造血干细胞移植受者进行了分组分析。结果 在纳入研究的 28966 名患者中,16730 人(58%)在住院头两天接受了雷米替韦治疗。经过PS配对后,对8822名雷米地韦组患者和8822名非雷米地韦组患者进行了分析。在没有补充氧气的患者中,雷米地韦可显著降低死亡率(aHR [95% CI]:14 天,0.73 [0.62-0.86];28 天,0.79 [0.68-0.91]),在有补充氧气的患者中,雷米地韦可显著降低死亡率(14 天,0.75 [0.67-0.85];28 天,0.78 [0.70-0.86])。在癌症、血液恶性肿瘤(包括白血病、淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤)和实体器官/造血干细胞移植患者亚组中,雷米替韦也与较低的死亡率相关。结论 在这一大群因 COVID-19 而住院的免疫力低下患者中,雷米替韦能显著改善患者的生存状况,包括具有不同基础免疫力低下状况的患者。将当前真实世界的证据纳入临床指南建议可为临床社区提供信息,以便在不断发展的 COVID-19 时代优化治疗决策,使其延续到公共卫生紧急状态声明结束之后。
{"title":"Remdesivir-associated survival outcomes among immunocompromised patients hospitalized for COVID-19: real-world evidence from the Omicron dominant era","authors":"Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Mark Berry, Alpesh N Amin, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae510","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae510","url":null,"abstract":"Background Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at an increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and mortality. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to inform outcomes of such patients treated with remdesivir. Methods Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. Primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score (PS) matched patients in remdesivir versus non-remdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematologic malignancies, and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Results Of 28,966 patients included in the study, 16,730 (58%) received remdesivir during first two days of hospitalization. After PS matching, 8,822 patients in remdesivir and 8,822 patients in non-remdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality among patients with no supplemental oxygen (aHR [95% CI]: 14-day, 0.73 [0.62-0.86]; 28-day, 0.79 [0.68-0.91]) and among those with supplemental oxygen (14-day, 0.75 [0.67-0.85]; 28-day, 0.78 [0.70-0.86]). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma), and solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142440274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Tannous et al. 葡萄球菌感染中的达托霉素药代动力学/药效学目标。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae018
Romain Garreau, Truong-Thanh Pham, Laurent Bourguignon, Aurélien Millet, François Parant, David Bussy, Marine Desevre, Victor Franchi, Tristan Ferry, Sylvain Goutelle
{"title":"Reply to Tannous et al.","authors":"Romain Garreau, Truong-Thanh Pham, Laurent Bourguignon, Aurélien Millet, François Parant, David Bussy, Marine Desevre, Victor Franchi, Tristan Ferry, Sylvain Goutelle","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae018","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1121-1122"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139485290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine when Co-administered with Adjuvanted Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial. 呼吸道合胞病毒预融合 F 蛋白疫苗与添加佐剂的季节性四价流感疫苗合用的安全性和免疫原性:3期随机试验。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae365
Rebecca Clark, Sam Davies, Jorge Labrador, Paul Loubet, Silvina Natalini Martínez, Helena Moza Moríñigo, Jean-François Nicolas, Mercè Pérez Vera, Mika Rämet, Maria Henar Rebollo-Rodrigo, Iván Sanz-Muñoz, Nancy Dezutter, Sophie Germain, Marie-Pierre David, Amulya Jayadev, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Shady Kotb, Nadia Meyer

Background: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds.

Methods: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.

Results: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups.

Conclusions: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine.

Clinical trials registration: NCT05568797.

背景:我们评估了在≥65岁的老年人中同时接种佐剂季节性四价流感疫苗(FLU-aQIV)和基于F蛋白的呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)预融合疫苗(RSVPreF3 OA)的情况:这项 3 期开放标签试验随机分配年龄≥65 岁的患者同时接种 FLU-aQIV 和 RSVPreF3 OA(联合接种),或相隔 1 个月依次接种(对照组)。主要目的是证明FLU-aQIV和RSVPreF3 OA同时接种与顺序接种相比,在疫苗接种后1个月,各株FLU-aQIV的血凝抑制(HI)滴度以及RSV-A和RSV-B的中和滴度方面无劣效。此外,还对反应原性和安全性进行了评估:共有 1045 人接种了疫苗(联合免疫:523 人;对照组:522 人)。在甲型/乙型/Victoria(H1N1)、乙型/Victoria和乙型/Yamagata流感菌株的HI滴度和RSV-A中和滴度方面,FLU-aQIV和RSVPreF3 OA联合给药与连续给药相比无劣效(调整后几何平均滴度[GMT]比[对照组/联合给药组]≤1.50的95%置信区间[CI]上限[UL]),但在甲型/乙型/Victoria(H1N1)、乙型/Victoria和乙型/Yamagata流感菌株的HI滴度和RSV-A中和滴度方面无劣效。50),但对 A/Darwin(H3N2) HI 滴度的影响不大(95% CI UL = 1.53)。接种后调整的 GMT 比值(对照组/联合用药组)为 1.23(95% CI:1.06-1.42,即 UL ≤1.50),表明联合用药后对 A/Darwin(H3N2)产生了充分的免疫反应。各组之间的RSV-B中和滴度相当(调整后GMT比值的95% CI UL≤1.50)。主动发生的不良反应大多为轻度或中度,且为一过性;主动发生的不良反应和严重不良反应的发生率在各组之间保持平衡:临床试验注册:临床试验注册:NCT05568797。
{"title":"Safety and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine when Co-administered with Adjuvanted Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial.","authors":"Rebecca Clark, Sam Davies, Jorge Labrador, Paul Loubet, Silvina Natalini Martínez, Helena Moza Moríñigo, Jean-François Nicolas, Mercè Pérez Vera, Mika Rämet, Maria Henar Rebollo-Rodrigo, Iván Sanz-Muñoz, Nancy Dezutter, Sophie Germain, Marie-Pierre David, Amulya Jayadev, Hiwot Amare Hailemariam, Shady Kotb, Nadia Meyer","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae365","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>NCT05568797.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1088-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141888685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Effectiveness of 3 Novel All-Oral Shortened Regimens for Rifampicin- or Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Kazakhstan. 哈萨克斯坦治疗耐利福平或耐多药结核病的三种新型全口服缩短疗法的安全性和有效性。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae305
Makhmujan Rashitov, Molly F Franke, Letizia Trevisi, Gulzhanat Bekbolatova, Julia Shalimova, Gafurzhan Eshmetov, Sagit Bektasov, Allison LaHood, Nataliya Arlyapova, Elna Osso, Askar Yedilbayev, Oleksandr Korotych, Anisoara Ciobanu, Alena Skrahina, Carole D Mitnick, Kwonjune J Seung, Yerkebulan Algozhin, Michael L Rich

Background: In 2019, the World Health Organization called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three 9-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded.

Results: Of 510 participants, 41% were women, the median age was 37 years (25th-75th percentile: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. A total of 399 (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% CI: 89-95%), 89% (95% CI: 80-94%), and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz, respectively. Clinically relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon.

Conclusions: All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.

背景:2019年,世界卫生组织呼吁开展针对耐多药和耐利福平结核病(MDR/RR-TB)的全口服缩短疗程方案的业务研究。我们报告了包含贝达喹啉(Bdq)、利奈唑胺(Lzd)和左氧氟沙星(Lfx),并用环丝氨酸(Cs)和氯法齐明(Cfz)、地拉那米(Dlm)和吡嗪酰胺(Z)或Dlm和Cfz加强治疗的三种为期9个月的全口服治疗方案的安全性和有效性:我们在哈萨克斯坦的公共卫生机构开展了一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是在业务研究条件下开始接受肺部 MDR/RR-TB 治疗的患者。每月对参与者进行不良事件筛查。基线耐药性患者被排除在研究之外,并接受更长疗程的治疗。我们分析了所有参与者中与临床相关的特殊不良事件,以及未被排除者的痰培养转换和治疗结束结果:在 510 名参与者中,41% 为女性,年龄中位数为 37 岁(四分位间范围:28-49 岁),18% 的参与者体重指数为结论:所有治疗方案都显示出卓越的安全性和有效性,为患者、医疗服务提供者和项目提供了更多潜在的治疗选择。
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of 3 Novel All-Oral Shortened Regimens for Rifampicin- or Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Kazakhstan.","authors":"Makhmujan Rashitov, Molly F Franke, Letizia Trevisi, Gulzhanat Bekbolatova, Julia Shalimova, Gafurzhan Eshmetov, Sagit Bektasov, Allison LaHood, Nataliya Arlyapova, Elna Osso, Askar Yedilbayev, Oleksandr Korotych, Anisoara Ciobanu, Alena Skrahina, Carole D Mitnick, Kwonjune J Seung, Yerkebulan Algozhin, Michael L Rich","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae305","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, the World Health Organization called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three 9-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 510 participants, 41% were women, the median age was 37 years (25th-75th percentile: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. A total of 399 (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% CI: 89-95%), 89% (95% CI: 80-94%), and 100% (95% CI: 86-100%) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz, respectively. Clinically relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1046-1053"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478590/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141247772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Diagnostic Stewardship to Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction: Low Yield of Follow-up Testing on Plasma and Bronchoalveolar Lavage After a Negative Result. 真菌聚合酶链反应的诊断管理应用:结果阴性后对血浆和支气管肺泡灌洗液进行后续检测的低产率。
IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae382
Tong Wang, Bosung Park, Gavin Anderson, Brian Shaller, Indre Budvytiene, Niaz Banaei

Background: Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result.

Results: A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease.

Conclusions: Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.

背景:侵袭性真菌病的早期诊断对于优化治疗至关重要。虽然对血浆和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)进行真菌聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的临床实用性已得到证实,但后续检测的作用仍不明确:这是一项回顾性单中心研究。方法:这是一项回顾性的单中心研究,在阴性结果出现后的 1、2、3 和 4 周对血浆和/或 BAL 上的曲霉菌、粘菌、镰刀菌、头孢菌、二态真菌、肺孢子菌和念珠菌的 PCR 随访结果进行了测定:共对 264 名患者的 406 份血浆标本和 431 名患者的 983 份 BAL 标本进行了 1389 次跟踪检测。总体而言,血浆在 1、2、3 和 4 周的阳性率分别为 2.7% (4/148)、3.3% (4/123)、5.1% (4/78) 和 3.5% (2/57),BAL 的阳性率分别为 0% (0/333)、0.3% (1/288)、0.4% (1/228) 和 0.7% (1/134)。血浆中的曲霉菌、黏菌剂和镰刀菌 PCR 以及 BAL 中的曲霉菌和嗜肺曲霉菌 PCR 均可导致转阴。所有转阴患者均为免疫力低下者。在之前检测结果为阴性的 1 周内,血浆中有 2 例曲霉菌和 2 例粘菌 PCR 检测结果呈阳性,BAL 检测结果呈阳性的患者为零。在第 1 周,只有 1 种曲霉菌在第 7 天呈阳性,被归类为可能的真菌病:结论:在之前检测结果为阴性的 4 周内对血浆和 BAL 进行真菌 PCR 后续检测的结果较低,而且在第一周内很少出现具有临床意义的阳性结果。
{"title":"Application of Diagnostic Stewardship to Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction: Low Yield of Follow-up Testing on Plasma and Bronchoalveolar Lavage After a Negative Result.","authors":"Tong Wang, Bosung Park, Gavin Anderson, Brian Shaller, Indre Budvytiene, Niaz Banaei","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae382","DOIUrl":"10.1093/cid/ciae382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of invasive fungal disease is essential for optimizing management. Although the clinical utility of fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) has been established, the role of follow-up testing remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study. The yield of follow-up PCR for Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, Scedosporium species, dimorphic fungi, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Candida species on plasma and/or BAL was measured at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks following a negative result.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1389 follow-up tests on 406 plasma specimens from 264 patients and 983 BAL specimens from 431 patients were evaluated. Overall, the positivity rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks was 2.7% (4/148), 3.3% (4/123), 5.1% (4/78), and 3.5% (2/57), respectively, on plasma, and 0% (0/333), 0.3% (1/288), 0.4% (1/228), and 0.7% (1/134), respectively, on BAL. Conversions occurred with Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, and Fusarium species PCR on plasma and Aspergillus species and P jirovecii PCR on BAL. All patients who converted were immunocompromised. Within 1 week of a prior negative test, 2 Aspergillus and 2 Mucorales PCRs were positive on plasma, and zero tests were positive on BAL. In week 1, only 1 Aspergillus species that was positive on day 7 was classified as probable fungal disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fungal PCR follow-up testing on plasma and BAL within 4 weeks of a prior negative result was of low yield and rarely generated a positive result considered clinically significant in the first week.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"944-952"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1